Blob column slow after upgrade from 9i to 11g

Hello, I recently upgraded 9i to 11g and the insert for blob column in one of the table is now really slow. can anyone help me please? thanks

Welcome to the forums !
It would be best to trace the insert statement. Pl see these threads on how to post a tuning request -
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
When your query takes too long ...
HTH
Srini

Similar Messages

SAP Business One V9 PL09 HF01 is slow after upgrading from 8.8 pl12

Hi Experts,
Recently we upgraded V9 Pl09 HF01 for a customer from V8.8 PL12, initally the application was working fine but few days before customer informed that SAP b1 is running very slow after upgrade. we are not sure this happen moreover we checked the server onfiguration and client machine configuration where the configurations are very good to running B1 v9.
if the customer want to post an invoice, in which the item selection is taking more thant 2 mins to open the item list window.
Please have a look on server and client hardware configuration,
Server is
ML350 G6 Dual Processor Capable, 1 x Xeon
5504 (2000/800-4MB) Quad Core, 1x2GB, 16GB memory,
This server only runs SAP, all the rest through duplicate server.
Client PCs
Lenovo ThinkCentre A58 7515 - Tower - 1 x P
E5400 / 2.7 GHz - RAM 4 GB and 2 GB RAM- HDD 1 x 320
GB - DVD-Writer - GMA X4500 - Gigabit
Ethernet - Windows 7 Pro 32 bit
Please help to solve this problem.
Regards
Sudhir Tamilvanan

Hi Sudhir,
What is the size of the database ?
Regards,
Johan

Images after upgrade from 10g to 11g

We recently upgraded from 10g to 11g and all the images are broke in the dashboard.
Can anyone provide the steps needs to be done in order to fix the broken images?
Thanks.

Put image files at
Drive:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\bifoundation\web\app\res\s_blafp\images
Drive:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\bifoundation_domain\servers\bi_server1\tmp\_WL_user\analytics_11.1.1\7dezjl\war\res\s_blafp\images
If required
Drive:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\bifoundation_domain\servers\AdminServer\tmp\.appmergegen_1291264099332\analytics.ear\ukjjdc\res\s_blafp\images
Call them using fmap
Syntax: fmap:images/imagename.imageformat
for e.g: fmap:images/geograph.jpg
Pls mark correct/helpful if helps

SQL query is slow after upgrading from SQL 2008 to SQL 2008 R2

Hello
We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
Regards, Hennie
SELECT
P.BSN,
P.Persnr,
P.Roepnaam,
P.Tussenvoegsels,
P.Achternaam,
P.Geslacht,
COALESCE (P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam + ' ' + P.Tussenvoegsels, P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam, P.Achternaam) AS naamvolledig,
P.Telmobiel,
P.Telvast,
P.Postcode,
G.groep,
COALESCE (RM.nieuweDag, GR.Dag) AS dag,
COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) AS datum,
DATEPART(ww, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS weeknummer,
DATEPART(yyyy, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS jaar,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
   CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108) AS begintijdberekend,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
   CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108) AS eindtijdberekend,
CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN
   CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END), 108) + '-' +
   CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END), 108)
  ELSE CONVERT(NCHAR(5),COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd), 108) + '-' + CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd), 108)
  END AS Tijdspanne,
CASE
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 'Werk Intern'
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.relatienaam
  ELSE L.lokatie END AS Lokatieberekend,
R.relatienaam AS relatie,
L.IntExt,
RA.Omschrijving AS roosteractiviteit,
A.instroomdatum,
A.uitstroomdatum,
TT.trajecttype,
W.Naamvolledig AS Werkcoach,
A.ID_groepen,
T.ID_personen,
A.ID_werkcoaches,
CASE
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 20
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.id_relaties
  ELSE L.ID_relaties END AS ID_lokatieberekend,
A.ID_relaties AS ID_relatie,
R.nummer2 AS capaciteit,
GR.ID_groepsroosters,
CAST(CASE WHEN foto IS NOT NULL THEN 'Ja' ELSE NULL END AS char(2)) AS Foto,
W.Email,
W.TelefoonMobiel,
W.TelefoonVast
FROM
dbo.personen AS P INNER JOIN
dbo.trajecten AS T ON T.ID_personen = P.ID_personen INNER JOIN
dbo.trajecttype AS TT ON T.ID_trajecttype = TT.ID_trajecttype INNER JOIN
dbo.trajectactiviteiten AS A ON A.ID_trajecten = T.ID_trajecten INNER JOIN
dbo.groepsroosters AS GR ON GR.ID_groepen = A.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.roosteractiviteit AS RA ON GR.ID_roosteractiviteit = RA.ID_roosteractiviteit INNER JOIN
dbo.lokaties AS L ON GR.ID_lokaties = L.ID_lokaties INNER JOIN
dbo.werkcoaches AS W ON A.ID_werkcoaches = W.ID_werkcoaches INNER JOIN
dbo.groepen AS G ON A.ID_groepen = G.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.relaties AS R ON A.ID_relaties = R.ID_relaties LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.roostermutaties AS RM ON P.ID_personen = RM.ID_personen AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = RM.ID_groepsroosters AND RM.aanwezig IS NULL
WHERE
(COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) BETWEEN GETDATE() - 1 AND GETDATE() + 13)
AND (COALESCE (DATEDIFF(day, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum), A.uitstroomdatum), 0) >= 0)
AND (DATEDIFF(day, A.instroomdatum, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) >= 0)
AND ((SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
  FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
  WHERE (P.ID_personen = ID_personen)
  AND (GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters)
  AND (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
  CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)) AND
  (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
  CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))) = 0)

We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
It is not uncommon to experience performance problems following an upgrade when there are issues with original query. Non-sargable expressions like Olaf called out are often the culprit, as well as lack of useful indexes and statistics.
The optimizer cannot glean accurate row count estimates or use indexes efficiently so the resultant plan may not be optimal for the task at hand. It is only by happenstance that old plan performed better; it could just as well be the other way around,
but again only by chance since the optimizer is guessing.
You might also try using EXISTS instead of SELECT COUNT(*)...= 0:
AND EXISTS(SELECT *
FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
WHERE P.ID_personen = ID_personen
AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters
AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)
AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Wireless internet speeds slower after upgrading from 10/2 to 50/25?? Using olders revision Mi424WR.

We have been using the oldest version/revision of the Actiontec Mi424WR router provided by verizon for 3+ years. Recently we upgraded from an outdated 10/2 internet plan to our current 50/25 wireless plan. The speeds when wired are fantastic, but with wireless, on multiple computers the speed even right next to the router hovers at about 10mbps. I understand about the degradation and limit of wireless signals, but we should absolutely be getting higher download speeds than 10mbps(~1Mb/s). On our older 10/2 mbps plan our devices were receiving consistant download speeds of higher than we are getting now, maxing out at 1.6Mb/s usually. The only change that has been made recently is we reset the router to fatory settings, leading me to believe that wireless settings that were in place before are no longer there and throttling wireless speeds. I do not expect to get the full 50+ mbps speed that I am getting from wired, but I do expect my wireless speeds to be consistent with our upgraded plan(let alone slower than our massively slower old plan). Any thoughts or help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

You should definetely get better speeds even with an older router, upto about 20 or so.
If that works for you, then it's probably just a little wireless interference.
you can change that in the router. open a browser, and go to http://192.168.1.1
user name is admin. and the password is most likely the serial number found on the service tag of your VZ router unless you changed it. Once you login succesfully, go to the top and hit wireless, then on the left basic security. then go to option 3 which is channel 1, 6 and 11 and are the only channels you should try.
So it will likely be set to auto, change it to 11 and put the check for keep settings even after reboot (Directly under the channel) and then hit apply. after you hit apply, test your connection out, if you notice a difference, leave it like that until the problem happens again, and if it happens again, go back into the router, and try channel 6, test it out. and then finally 1 if the first two don't work.
Also take a look at page 2 of Actiontec's Wireless PDF File. It gives you some idea's with regards to position and orientation of where the router sits and how it can best be positioned for maximum coverage.
http://support.actiontec.com/doc_files/MI424WR_Rev(all)_Wireless_Networking_Guide.pdf

ACR extremely slow after upgrade from CS4 to CS5

After upgrading Photoshop and Bridge from 4.0 to 5.0 I can no longer edit photos in ACR (plugin v 6.3) because it now takes impractically long to refresh the image after most changes. For example, on the Basic pane if I change a setting such as Exposure, Brightness, etc. with a slider it takes about 5 seconds before I see the change to the image. Since CS4 is still on my computer if I load CS4 Bridge, open the same image in Camera Raw (plugin v 5.5) the same operation refreshes the image in about a half second. If I can't solve this problem I'll have to abandon CS5 and go back to CS4, which would be a shame. Any ideas? Thank you!

You shouldn't be running version 5.5 of the Camera Raw plug-in in CS4 either. Update to ACR 5.7 ASAP.
One should ALWAYS run the LATEST release of ACR for your version of Photoshop, no exceptions. Each new release brings unheralded, unannounced and sometimes even unacknowledged bug fixes and improvements, beyond support for newer cameras.
Staying with an older version just because your camera is already supported by it is a very<euphemism>unwise</euphemism> decision.

Slow Queries After Upgrade from 9i to 11g

We are in the process of upgrading several of our databases from 9i to 11g. I am doing some performance testing using SQL developer and I have found that some queries are executed much faster on 9i than 11g. For example, the following query ran in 0.258 seconds on 9i and 836.50 on 11g (both databases have the same tables, indexes, data and there were no other jobs running at the time when I tested this query).
SELECT a.seq_short as seq_short, a.seq_long as seq_long, a.MD5 as md5,
a.upi as upi_key, a.len as length, a.crc64 as crc64, b.DBID as dbid,
c.DESCR as descr, c.FULL_DESCR as full_descr, b.ac as accession, b.gi as gene_id
FROM uniparc.protein a, uniparc.xref b, uniparc.cv_database c
WHERE a.upi = b.upi
AND b.dbid = c.id
;If you have any ideas what may be causing the slow down, or suggestions on how I can speed up the 11g query please let me know.
Regards,
Steve

Welcome to the forums !
How to post a tuning request:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
When your query takes too long ...
HTH
Srini

ODI Procedures not working after upgrading from 10G to 11G

Hello Gurus,
We have run into a scenario where the procedures in ODI are not working after we upgraded it from 10G to 11G (11.1.1.6). However we can make it to run if we create the procedure from scratch.
Also we are having issues related to packages where in the packages were running before we applied the patch 11.1.1.6.3. And after applying the patches they are not running.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks

If you want someone to help you, please be elaborate in the exact errors you are getting.
A general statement would do nothing but guess work.
What is the error that you get while executing the procedure.
What are the exact issues that you get while executing packages ?

Report Navigation Issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g

Hi Experts
I have recently upgarded my solution from 10g to 11g. Issue is when I click on column value for navigation it doen't navigate the display remains unchanged
1) I have created new dashboard and placed this report in new dashboard the navigation works fine.
2) I have created new report and placed that report in old dashboard it doesn't work
why is it so I undertand that there is problem with Dashboard and not with report but I am unable to figure it out
what can be the problem? any suggestions
Thanks
Sameer

Hi Experts
I have recently upgarded my solution from 10g to 11g. Issue is when I click on column value for navigation it doen't navigate the display remains unchanged
1) I have created new dashboard and placed this report in new dashboard the navigation works fine.
2) I have created new report and placed that report in old dashboard it doesn't work
why is it so I undertand that there is problem with Dashboard and not with report but I am unable to figure it out
what can be the problem? any suggestions
Thanks
Sameer

FF gets veery slow after upgrade from 3.6.28 to any later version incl 12

Removal, restart and reinstallation of 3.6.28 cures the problem. The slowness is expressed when changing pages and/or srolling.
The computer is Vaio VPCX11S1E lightweight w/ 128 GB SSD, 2GB RAM, Awast antivirus and Zone Alarm firewall.
No private plugins have been nsntalled

Try to start Firefox in [[Safe mode|Safe mode]]. This mode disables all extensions, user customizations, hardware acceleration, etc. temporarily for diagnostic and troubleshooting. If Firefox works fine in Safe Mode, then this is likely an add-on issue. Restart Firefox in normal mode, then type "About:addons" (without the quotes) in the address bar. Disable your extensions one by one, restarting Firefox between each one, until you find the trouble maker. Once you do, you can disable that add-on and report the issue to that add-on's developer.
A few other basic trouble shooting things you can try is this:
Run all Windows Updates, install all needed service packs, etc.
Update your graphics driver (Firefox uses your graphics card for some rendering, and an out of date graphics card driver can cause problems. [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers].
Update all your plugins (Flash, Java, etc.): [http://www.mozilla.org/plugincheck/ http://www.mozilla.org/plugincheck/].
Download and Install MalwareBytes Anti-Malware, run a full Scan. [http://www.malwarebytes.org/ http://www.malwarebytes.org/]. This helps check that there are no viruses on your computer causing issues. You can uninstall this program after you clean off any infections.

Weblogic 10.3.2 - Page reload in browser is very slow after upgrade from 8.

when i first load portal page with empty cache it comes up with in 8 seconds..
i have noticed that
browser requests the page -- weblogic app server sends back the file lets say xxxx.css with response 200
after the first load, if i reload the page
browser requests the page with the below header info.. and the weblogic server takes a long time to send back 304 not modified error, about 30+ seconds
in this case browser is sending If-Modified-Since: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:47:22 GMT , and here weblogic server takes 30+ seconds to check and return the 304 not modified page
can any one help what might be the issue
http:/xxxx/let.css
GET xxx/let.css HTTP/1.1
Host: xxxxxxx
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Accept: text/css,*/*;q=0.1
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 115
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cookie: JSESSIONID=FdZTM1FGnHKkRZ1x7pVpJ1pqbbzxqjbC4mx1sSGkRX5cHXndLhMJ!-1352170763; NSC_Qpsubm-80=0ac844d70050; s_cc=true; SC_LINKS=%5B%5BB%5D%5D; Not Segmented By Business Size=Not%20Segmented%20By%20Business%20Size; Did Not Visit The Support Site=Did%20Not%20Visit%20The%20Support%20Site; Core Site Page (Includes Microsite Pages)=Core%20Site%20Page%20%28Includes%20Microsite%20Pages%29; s_sq=%5B%5BB%5D%5D
If-Modified-Since: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:47:22 GMT
Cache-Control: max-age=0
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13:23 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.63 (Unix)
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100
Expires: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13:23 GMT
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Set-Cookie: NSC_Qpsubm-80=0ac844d70050;expires=Wed,13-Oct-10 10:15:56 GMT;path=/

We've seen this issue on some servers, but not on others running the same application. We're still researching the problem, but the best lead we've got so far is that it might have something to do with the network, either with not being able to look up a network address with DNS or accessing this address.

ITunes 9.0.3 Visualizer very slow after upgrading from 9.0.2

hi all !
i noticed that when I start the visualizer, rather than playing nice and smooth as it used to, it now chunks.
anybody else seeing this and is there a solution ?
tia

take a look here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11239021#11239021.

Slow table creation after upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using DBUA

I've recently completed a database upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using the DBUA.
I've since encountered a slowdown when running a script which drops and recreates a series of ~250 tables. The script normally runs in around 19 seconds. After the upgrade, the script requires ~2 minutes to run.
By chance has anyone encountered something similar?
The problem may be related to the behavior of an "after CREATE on schema" trigger which grants select privileges to a role through the use of a dbms_job call; between 10g and the database that was upgraded from 10G to 11g. Currently researching this angle.
I will be using the following table creation DDL for this abbreviated test case:
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA;When calling the above DDL, an "after CREATE on schema" trigger is fired which schedules a job to immediately run to grant select privilege to a role for the table which was just created:
create or replace
trigger select_grant
after CREATE on schema
declare
    l_str varchar2(255);
    l_job number;
begin
    if ( ora_dict_obj_type = 'TABLE' ) then
        l_str := 'execute immediate "grant select on ' ||
                                     ora_dict_obj_name ||
                                    ' to select_role";';
        dbms_job.submit( l_job, replace(l_str,'"','''') );
    end if;
end;
{code}
Below I've included data on two separate test runs. The first is on the upgraded database and includes optimizer parameters and an abbreviated TKPROF. I've also, included the offending sys generate SQL which is not issued when the same test is run on a 10g environment that has been set up with a similar test case. The 10g test run's TKPROF is also included below.
The version of the database is 11.2.0.1.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the upgraded 11g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean     FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      11.2.0.1
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes      boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics     boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines     boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          03-11-2010 16:33
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           03-11-2010 17:03
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         0
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           713.978495
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM               1565.746
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED                   2310
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Output from TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 324
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Here is the performance hit portion of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
SQL ID: fsbqktj5vw6n9
Plan Hash: 1443566277
select next_run_date, obj#, run_job, sch_job
from
(select decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, a.next_run_date,
a.last_enabled_time) next_run_date,       a.obj# obj#,
decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, 0, 1) run_job, a.sch_job sch_job from
(select p.obj# obj#, p.flags flags, p.next_run_date next_run_date,
p.job_status job_status, p.class_oid class_oid,      p.last_enabled_time
last_enabled_time, p.instance_id instance_id,      1 sch_job   from
sys.scheduler$_job p   where bitand(p.job_status, 3) = 1    and
((bitand(p.flags, 134217728 + 268435456) = 0) or
(bitand(p.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and bitand(p.flags, 4096) = 0    and
p.instance_id is NULL    and (p.class_oid is null      or (p.class_oid is
not null      and p.class_oid in (select b.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class b
                           where b.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select
q.obj#, q.flags, q.next_run_date, q.job_status, q.class_oid,
q.last_enabled_time, q.instance_id, 1   from sys.scheduler$_lightweight_job
q   where bitand(q.job_status, 3) = 1    and ((bitand(q.flags, 134217728 +
268435456) = 0) or         (bitand(q.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and
bitand(q.flags, 4096) = 0    and q.instance_id is NULL    and (q.class_oid
is null      or (q.class_oid is not null      and q.class_oid in (select
c.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class c                          where
c.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select j.job, 0,
from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),      to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')
), 1, NULL,      from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),
to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')),     NULL, 0   from sys.job$ j   where
(j.field1 is null or j.field1 = 0)    and j.this_date is null) a   order by
1)   where rownum = 1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      0.47       0.47          0       9384          0           1
total        3      0.48       0.48          0       9384          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1   VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=6615380 card=194570)
      1    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790     VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=537269 us cost=2563 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790      UNION-ALL (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=439235 us)
    231       FILTER (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=920 us)
    231        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_JOB (cr=66 pr=0 pw=0 time=690 us cost=19 size=13157 card=223)
      1        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      1         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
      0       FILTER (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_LIGHTWEIGHT_JOB (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=95 card=1)
      0        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      0         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
194559       TABLE ACCESS FULL JOB$ (cr=9313 pr=0 pw=0 time=167294 us cost=2542 size=2529254 card=194558)
{code}
and the totals at the end of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        3      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       70      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute     85      0.01       0.01          0         62        208          37
Fetch       49      0.48       0.49          0       9490          0          35
total      204      0.51       0.51          0       9552        208          72
Misses in library cache during parse: 5
Misses in library cache during execute: 3
   35 user SQL statements in session.
   53 internal SQL statements in session.
   88 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 11gSID_ora_17721.trc
Trace file compatibility: 11.1.0.7
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      35 user SQL statements in trace file.
      53 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      88 SQL statements in trace file.
      51 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    1590 lines in trace file.
      18 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
The version of the database is 10.2.0.3.0.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the 10g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         1
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           2110.16949
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Now for the TKPROF of a mirrored test environment running on a 10G SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.01       0.01          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 113
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Totals for the TKPROF on the 10g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.02          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       65      0.01       0.01          0          1         32           0
Execute     84      0.04       0.09         20         90        272          35
Fetch       88      0.00       0.10         30        281          0          64
total      237      0.07       0.21         50        372        304          99
Misses in library cache during parse: 38
Misses in library cache during execute: 32
   10 user SQL statements in session.
   76 internal SQL statements in session.
   86 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 10gSID_ora_32003.trc
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      10 user SQL statements in trace file.
      76 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      86 SQL statements in trace file.
      43 unique SQL statements in trace file.
     949 lines in trace file.
       0 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
Edited by: user8598842 on Mar 11, 2010 5:08 PM

So while this certainly isn't the most elegant of solutions, and most assuredly isn't in the realm of supported by Oracle...
I've used the DBMS_IJOB.DROP_USER_JOBS('username'); package to remove the 194558 orphaned job entries from the job$ table. Don't ask, I've no clue how they all got there; but I've prepared some evil looks to unleash upon certain developers tomorrow morning.
Not being able to reorganize the JOB$ table to free the now wasted ~67MB of space I've opted to create a new index on the JOB$ table to sidestep the full table scan.
CREATE INDEX SYS.JOB_F1_THIS_NEXT ON SYS.JOB$ (FIELD1, THIS_DATE, NEXT_DATE) TABLESPACE SYSTEM;The next option would be to try to find a way to grant the select privilege to the role without using the aforementioned "after CREATE on schema" trigger and dbms_job call. This method was adopted to cover situations in which a developer manually added a table directly to the database rather than using the provided scripts to recreate their test environment.
I assume that the following quote from the 11gR2 documentation is mistaken, and there is no such beast as "create or replace table" in 11g:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_9003.htm#i2061306
"Dropping a table invalidates dependent objects and removes object privileges on the table. If you want to re-create the table, then you must regrant object privileges on the table, re-create the indexes, integrity constraints, and triggers for the table, and respecify its storage parameters. Truncating and replacing have none of these effects. Therefore, removing rows with the TRUNCATE statement or replacing the table with a *CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE* statement can be more efficient than dropping and re-creating a table."

After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?

After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?
The issue is they type but there is 2 second delay when it appears in the field.
Windows 7 64bit

I see, I misread your reference to Reader 11 to mean you were using Acrobat 11, but it looks like it worked out anyway.
The base-14 fonts are special in PDF because they are guaranteed to be available even if they are not embedded. If you select a non-base-14 font for use with a form field, the entire font usually gets embedded, since each glyph it contains has to be available for use with the field. This can take up a lot of space if you do this a lot, and the space isn't reduced if you change back to a base-14 font later because the internal reference to it is not removed. This is caused by the bug I mentioned.
In your case, however, the entire font doesn't get embedded because fonts like it (e.g., large asian fonts with a lot of glyphs, Arial Unicode) would take up too much space if fully embedded. If it did, a 100KB PDF could bloat to 20MB with that one change. Instead, users are expected to have such fonts installed on their system, which is why you were prompted to install the font pack. This despite the fact that the font was not actually used by anything in your document, it was simply the orphaned reference to it that triggered this. This should get fixed in Acrobat eventually so this type of thing doesn't happen again.

Very slow encoding after upgrade from 5.03 to 5.5 with MXO2 mini

Hi all.
After upgrading from CS5.03 to 5.5 my encoding now takes 5 times as long. A 2 minute HD Video file would take 2 minutes, and still does on the PC I haven't upgraded (identical almost) but now with CS5.5 it takes almost 11 minutes.
Some explanation....
I create HD MJPEG files on a PC with Blackmagic Decklink.
I transfer these files to an HPz800 which used to run CS5.03 with Matrox Utils 5.1.1.37 and an MXO2 Mini with Max. (Nvidia Quadro fx4800 and 12GB of RAM)
On a Blackmagic timeline HD 1080i MJPEG with filters of Auto Color, Fast Color Corrector and Gamma correction a 2 minute timeline would encode in 2 minutes give or take a couple of seconds.
Now with CS5.5 and Mtx 5.5 an identical file takes 11 minutes to encode to Microsoft avi - Matrox 1920 x 1080i - 25fps.
If I remove the filters (which I need to be able to use) it will come down to 2 minutes as it used to be.....so it seems to be the filters are now slowing things down when they never used to. I have never rendered before exporting. Ever. So this time I tried rendering first and it brought the 11 minutes down to 7 minutes but when taking into account the 4 minutes rendering time I am no better off.
I have updated CS5.5 to CS 5.5.1 and MTX Utils to 5.5 and then 5.5.1 and it makes no difference. Still 11 minutes to decode 2 minutes with three filters, which is exactly what I have always been doing but now it doesn't work....
Can anybody help? or make a suggestion as to why using filters in 5.5 now multiplies the encode time by 5 when it never used to. Everything else bar Matrox Utils on this machine is as it was before the upgrade to 5.5 and as I say my older machine is still 5.03 it can do it all in 2 minutes even with the filters intact.
So have I really spent a small fortune upgrading to make my output 5 times slower. Not happy......

To go further, every single encode that I have done is slower than it was before with CS5.01 or 5.03.
This is odd because going from Blackmagic to any other codec doesn't necessarily need the Matrox box or Matrox utils
Blackmagic HD or SD to
Matrox HD
QT HD MP4
QT SD DV25
DV AVI SD
Mpeg2 - DVD
Every single encode is slow by 2x to 6x.
Why should Blackmagic HD to QT MOV MP4 take twice as long as it used to...... having said that The speeds I am seeing now are what it was like before I attached the box in the first place, whether a Matrox codec was involved or not.... It is acting like a blocked funnel. when it used to be a lovely wide and clear funnel.
Anyway Matrox have reproduced the problem and are investigating, so hopefully there will be an answer soon....

Blob column slow after upgrade from 9i to 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for