Blocking a user from making changes in VF01

Hi !
I am trying to impose a check while doing VF01, so that my users cannot make any changes in Condition.They can view the pricing structure in VF01.
Subsequently saving the Billing.
Rgds,
Indtajit

Hi Indrajit
This can be done by contacting Basis or Security team.
If you just give authorization to VF03 then they can not make any changes. These authorizations can be given on the USER ID's.
Prasad

Similar Messages

ME53N Prevent user from making a change

How do you prevent a user from making a change to a purchase requistion via transaction ME53N? We want the user to make a change to the purchase requisition using transaction ME52N not transaction ME53N. When the user is in transaction ME53N and clicks on the pencil to change the purchase requisition we want to prevent the user from making any changes by sending a message or force the screen to go to display mode. Thank you in advance.

Sharon,
I don't believe that your exact requirement can be met with standard SAP.
However, this is a very odd requirement. It sounds like you are saying that it is OK for a user to make a PR change in ME52N, but for the same user it is not OK to make a PR change in ME53N.
In most companies, if it is not OK for a user to make a PR change in ME53N, it is therefore also not OK for this user to make a PR change in ANY transaction, including ME52N.
It is a straightforward matter to allow a user access to ME53N and ME52N, but to block his ability to change any PR at any time. If this is your requirement, then consult with your authorization team about the authorization objects that are checked in the ME5* series of transactions. As I recall, it is possible to tailor authorizations (create/change/display etc) by plant, by Purchasing group, by purchasing org,by document type, etc.
Rgds,
DB49

How To Block a User From Changing Total Field In AR Invoice

Hi all,
I would like to find out how to block a user from being able to change the total field at the bottom right hand side of the AR Invoice. Currently if a user creates an invoice and is still busy in that invoice they can adjust the total field which in turn will update the discount field as well.
Is this simply an authorization issue or am I going to have to do it in the transaction notification?
We are using SAP Business One PL 30 currently.

Hi
Please review by note again -This is by system design .
I don't know why you are so worried abt this because by setting up discount max ,if user cannot post the document ,that means it is not in the system ,no matter they change multiple times in the fields .
But I think your scenario is different ,
You are copying with certain discount from Delivery to AR invoice and i think you don't want user to change the discount field , then you can solve your issue by using approval or sp_notification
If you really want it to be greyed out ,I think you might have to go through by SDK or Boyum addon.
Thank you
Bishal

How to restrict the user from making any changes in Sales order- item level

Hi to all
How to restrict the users from making any changes in sales order at item level if the same sales order is released by senior user through status profile.
Regards
Anish Parikh
Edited by: anish parikh on Jan 24, 2008 5:16 AM

Hi Anish,
This can be achieved through the roles and authorization.
This can be done through the basis team. they can create user profiles and roles.
For the roles they assign some transaction codes so that they can view the only assigned tr. codes.
Like that ur requirement can be done.
Also u can prevent the user to change any fields in the sales order screen (VA02). for that please modify the authorisations.
Hope i answers.
Reward points if useful.
Edited by: kaleeswaran bhoopathy on Jan 24, 2008 9:57 AM

Restrict users from making repository changes

We want to restrict certain users from making workbench/repository changes. Is this possible through transaction PFCG by roles? If so, what authorizations do I need to customize?

In a nutshell users should have limited authoriztions to items of S_DEVELOP auth. object.
Regards,
Mike
Message was edited by: Mike Puzankov

Stopping user from making in app purchases on a live iPhone app

Hi
I am trying to stop user from making in app purchases on a live iPhone app. What i have done is i made Cleared for Sale: No in itunesconnect product id and Status is changed to Status: Developer Removed from Sale. But still i am able to do in app purchase in the app. Any idea why is it? anything i should do? Last Thureday night i have done this changes in itunes connect. i don't want to delete the product id from the itunesconnect.
Thanks
Anish

Hey Michael,
Is that the only way to stop in app purchase? delete the product ids from the itunes connect?
Thanks
Anish

!!!How to restrict user for making changes in Sales order , partner level

Hi all,
Can anybody tell me how to restrict user for making changes in Sales order at partner level, is it through user exit?

Hi Ruchi
I hope u had gone to the screen fields which u want them not to be editable. So there u select all the fields contents which u do not want to to be changed and check the boxes with W.content and Display and save it. Once evrything is done u have to activate the particular transcation going in to the standard variants and put the name and click the activate button.
Hope its clear
Reward if help ful
Sri

Hi there. My iPod Nano was stolen from my car today. I do know the serial number of this stolen device. Is there any way that Apple can block another user from connecting this stolen device to iTunes?

Hi there. My iPod Nano was stolen from my car today. I do know the serial number of this stolen device. Is there any way that Apple can block another user from connecting this stolen device to iTunes? Also, if another user was to attempt to connect this stolen device to iTunes, would Apple be able to inform of the username of this person in order that I could then pass this information to the police?

Is there any way that Apple can block another user from connecting this stolen device to iTunes?
No.
Also, if another user was to attempt to connect this stolen device to iTunes, would Apple be able to inform of the username of this person in order that I could then pass this information to the police?
No. Apple can do nothing to help. Sorry.
Reporting a lost or stolen Apple product
B-rock

Prevent user from making to many requests...

Hallo everybody,
We are using Tomcat 5.0 and have some large jsp's (reports) that consume large memory.
1. Is there an easy way to prevent a user from making to many requests (eg. if he refreshes the page too many times, Tomcat gets an Out-of-memory error).
Of cource increasing the memory is not the answer I'm looking for (already did that).
2. Or may be a way to retrict a user to a certain maximum of memory
This seems like a common problem; anyone have good advice?
Thanks in advance.
Marcus

The main reason for multiple refreshes is the report taking too long to run and users getting impatient? Or is there another reason.
1 - Give the users fair warning. Put a message on the page saying "this report takes time to run. do NOT refresh this page as then the report will take even longer"
2 - You might set it up as a two stage process. Generate the report to a file. Then give them a link to check the progress of the report or load it if it is finished.
That way when they refresh, they don't regenerate the report, but just get back a immediate response that tells them "come back later"
3 - Perhaps you might consider the synchronizer token pattern.
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip136.html
4 - restricting users to max amount of memory would be difficult. How do you tell it is the same user? You could use a session variable, and record how many reports they have currently running, and reject any more then 3-4 requests at one time. But that could be worked around quite easily - just open up a new browser and its a new session.

Can I block website on user Basis...I want to block Perticular user from some URLs

I want to block some Urls from some local users....How can i do that ..... I should able to access these sites.

First you should update Firefox, as the old version you have is leaving you vulnerable to attack. [[Update Firefox to the latest version]]
If you want to control web access, try reading [[Block and unblock websites with parental controls]]

Can i block my phone from making a call to certain number?

I want to block my phone from me calling a certain number but let it receive calls from that number.
Thanks!

You can... however it will cost $4.99/mth for the feature through AT&T. You can limit texts, ban certain phone numbers and add certain ones. You can also set up time of day restrictions.

How do I block limited users from downloading or installing files?

Hello and greetings from the Sooner state! I am embarrassingly seeking your advice and guidance on a topic I should have a solution for given my background as a certified A+ Technician and Cyber Security Technician in the United
States Air Force. The issue is this, I have a user (my son) who continues to find ways to download and install malware via video online games or uncommon search engines (Vosteran), something else he has managed to do…   To this date I have
ensured that he is logging on to his Windows 7 computer utilizing a Limited User Account, I have locked down his machine utilizing a combination of iolo System Mechanic, Microsoft Family Safety (my primary parental control software), Microsoft
Security Essentials none of which block the installation of software at the Limited User level.   If you look at the Top 3 Parental Control suite of software there is nothing that includes such a utility as part of their software package that prohibits
or bars your kids from installing software on their own. I know that a Limited User is supposed to be restricted from installing any software but this isn’t the case with my Son. What would your best advice be for me in this situation? Again,
I should have this info down pat yet I do not (that’s what retirement does to you, LOL)…   Many thanks in advance for your help! Peace!!

Hi Doc Bryan,
If you are using consumer versions of win7 (higher than home premium), you could use the Group policy to impose various restrictions on installing and running software and those will apply on standard users.
To prevent Installation of software by using windows installer.
Run gpedit.msc to open group policy editor.
Navigate to Computer configuration/Administrator Templates/Windows Components/Windows installer/Prohibit User Installs
Enable this policy and change the “User Install Behavior” option value to “Hide User Install”.
To prevent downloading files from Internet Explorer
Navigate to User configuration/Administrator Templates/Windows Components/Internet Explorer/Internet Control Penal/Security Page/Internet Zone/Allow file downloads
Enable this policy and change the “Allow file downloads” option value to “Disable”.
Note: Since for Windows it is hard to define that which exe file is installation or execution of the program, there is always some way can walk around this Group policy such as hard disk copy program or using third party Internet browsers
to download.
So you also need Parental Controls feature(also apply to home edition)
and you can find it in control panel, choose the standard account to which you want to apply the control. Now click ‘Allow and Block Specific Programs’ link and choose ‘[User] can only use the programs I allow’ option.
After analyzing, it will show you the list of all programs installed on the system which can be used by the standard user. Hit the Check All button to allow all programs, then find and uncheck Chrome and other apps that you want to restrict. When done, hit
OK.
If your kids want to use a certain software and you find it safe to use. Log inside your Administrator account and install it from there. While installing, please select “Install for All Users” when prompted. Doing this will install the software for all
users.
Regards

Prevent Change agent from making changes to requests after approved

Does anyone know how to block changes made to a Change Request after it has been approved?

If you're talking about preventing changes to a change request record after it's been approved, I have a couple suggestions, but they require custom development effort.
One possibility would be to create a custom control applied to the Change Request form that does this for you. Using Anton's custom control technique, you could create a control that, when the form loads, reads the current state of a
CR's review activity and, if it's approved, finds and disables all of the controls on the form.
http://blog.scsmsolutions.com/2011/08/create-custom-user-control-for-scsm-2010/ This post is for SCSM 2010, but the principal is the same for SCSM 2012.
Another possibility is to create your own Change Request form from scratch that implements similar capability (ie: every time the form is opened, the FormLoad event checks the state of the review activity and disables/enabled all other form controls appropriately).
Creating your own form would require you to override the out-of-the-box form for which there is no supported method yet. Plus, creating your own change request form would require much more development effort including knowledge of Visual Studio, WPF/XAML,
C#, and the unsupported console API.
These techniques to "block" changes will only work on a form, though. A user would still be able to make changes directly with powershell or the SDK. They could also make changes with any of the out-of-the-box console tasks that manipulate change requests.
I'm afraid there's no "simple" answer, though.
However, keep in mind that all changes to any record in Service Manager are recorded in the history of that record. So while it might be difficult to block changes, you can always review any changes that were made after a CR has been approved, including
who made the change and when. That's more of a reactive approach instead of a proactive approach.

Restricting users from backend changes

Hello,
I have some users who keep doing the changes from backend without going into the application ( Forms 10g Frontend). I want to restrict all users to change the data from backend so that whenever they use sqlplus they can't change the records in the tables. But whenever they are running the application ( Oracle forms) they should be able to change(insert/Update/Delete) the records in the table. Any suggestion how can I make this happen.
Thank you.

Assuming the users dont have the schema owner password and have to log into their own accounts in sqlplus.
grant a role to the user identified by a password. Dont tell the users the password. :)
grant select, insert, update, delete, execute permissions to specific tables, functions, procedures to the role.
When the users go into sqlplus they wont be able to do anything until the role is enabled since it has a password. Remember, they dont know the password so they are not going to be doing much.
In your pre-form trigger do this to enable the role so they can do things.
Check to see if the currently logged in person has the role assigned..
SELECT GRANTED_ROLE
FROM USER_ROLE_PRIVS
WHERE USERNAME = my_username_variable and
granted_role = 'MY_ROLE';
if they do have the role then do this...
DBMS_SESSION.SET_ROLE('my_role IDENTIFIED BY my_password');
Now they can insert, update, delete and so on from the form.

Can't lock the system from making changes...

MacBook PRO with 10.4.9 and the system will not remain locked upon restart.
For example, in System Preferences->Sharing, I change the name of the computer, lock it and then do a restart. Once back in OS X the computer is in a unlocked position. I can lock it but it won't stay that way.
Any ideas on how to make it stay in a locked position? Thanks!

Although it may introduce its own issues depending on usage, enabling the "System Preferences" > "Security" > "Require password to unlock each secure system preference" option should prevent pref panes from being unlocked after rebooting.
Generally, these pref panes become unlocked in this manner only in "admin" accounts so a better option might be to refrain from using an "admin" account for routine use - use a "standard" account for the day to day things, and keep a separate "admin" account to be used only for performing administrative functions.

Blocking a user from making changes in VF01

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for