BP and Contract based on MR Reason

Hi All,
   I need to find out Business partner and contract based on MR reason for specific instalation(anlage) and document number (ablbelnr).Please let me know if there is any FM which provide the same data or any other way to figure it out.
Thanks,
Ruchi

using three tables you can fetch this data ( I m not sure abt FM)
1. table EABLG -> input - MR reason for specific instalation(anlage) and document number (ablbelnr)
                              output- take shedule meter reading date date... adatsoll (to identify the correct contract
2. table EVER -> input - installation where movein date <= adatsoll <= move out date
                           output -  contract and contract account
3. table FKKVKP-> input - contract account
                              output - BP
Regards,
Sanjoy

Similar Messages

  • Approval for Contract and Order based on PO date and Document Date Combinat

    Dear All,
        I have a critical requirement from my client.
    1. If the PO date in the contract is less than 10 days or more of the document date [Created date] then further process should not be allowed. Only authorized person should release the contract, and then order creation should be possible.
    For example: Customer PO date is 18-07-2011 and if the document date is 28-08-2011, then system should stop for further processing. Only after release this should be allowed to proceed.
    2. Sales order scheduled date for item is 30.07.2011 and if the PO date is 18.07.2011 again system should again go for approval. Business requires this because the time gap between the PO date and the delivery date is very short, so only on approval the next process should be allowed.
    Is this possible through Status profile? I have tried this but I canu2019t give condition like if it less than the PO date system should go for approval.
    Kindly guide me if this is possible and share your ideas.
    Best Regards,
    Venugopal

    Hi Venu,
           In user eixt USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP (inlcude MV45AFZZ) write the code to compare the PO date and contract creatioon date and if the PO date is 10days less than the contract creation date reject all the line items with a special reason for rejection at the item level if the document is a contract or if the document is a sales order then populate a delivery block.
    Regarding the authorization to release the contract you can think of below options.
    Give authorization to only specific people to remove the reason for rejection or  remove the delivery block.
    Or
    If you want to automate the approval process then based on the delivery block setup workflow which will raise an event and trigger an email to the approver inbox. For the approval you can give options like Approve/Reject. Based on the apporver's action design the workflow to change the contract accordingly i.e either removing the delivery block or keep it as it is.

  • Part Time, Contract Based, and Full Time Positions available for LabVIEW Developers

    Mindready (www.mindready.com) is looking for flexible, hard working individuals to fill part time, contract based, and full-time/permanent jobs in LabVIEW development positions. We have immediate needs for contract labor in Dallas, TX; NY; Huntsville, AL and Austin, TX, as well as other locations.  US Citizen and Security Clearance required on some projects.   Mindready is a certified National Instruments Alliance Partner with facilities in Montreal, Austin, TX and (Radical Systems, Inc. – a mindready company) Huntsville, AL (www.radicalsystems.com).
    The duties of the positions include:
    • On and off-site LabVIEW development work.  May involve TestStand, instrumentation such as PXI and stand alone instruments, DAQ, Motion, Vision, etc.)
    • Willingness to travel for periods as short as 2-3 days, to as long as 6 months.  (Ideal candidate would be local to any long assignment)
    • Integrate into customer’s development team to design and modify new/existing LabVIEW applications. 
    The ideal candidate would possess the following skills & qualifications:
    • Intermediate-to-advanced knowledge of LabVIEW (a pre-employment test is required)
    • Broad technical knowledge is a plus, we serve a wide range of application areas
    • Excellent writing, communication (English), time-management, and interpersonal skills.
    • Ability to travel for on-site work at customer facilities for jobs as short as 1 week, possibly as long as 6 months.
    • Discipline and organization with respect to software development and maintenance.
    • Engineering, Technical or Computer Science degree or appropriate experience
    • Certification is not required but would be beneficial
    Pay is commensurate with skills and qualifications of the applicant.  Compensation will include a competitive hourly rate.

    Hi
    I completed my M.S in electronics engineering and working with GE in INDIA since June 2005. I have total 20 months of experience with LabVIEW and have the follwoing skills.
    Intermediate-to-advanced knowledge of LabVIEW.
    Ability to analyze empirical data against theoretical predictions to enhance and improve mathematical model of system.
    Familiarity with data acquisition concepts and hardware.
    Ability to work both alone and with colleagues to solve problems and to weigh the merits of differing approaches
    you can reach me at [email protected]
    Thanks & Regards
    Anil Punnam

  • Multiple Line item proposal in SAP based on return reason for Material Serv

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in which the customer returns the faulty material for repair, the company does the inspection of the material and sends the faulty material to the External vendors for Repairing.
    External Vendor after repairing sends the material back to the company, which is then returned back to the customer.
    I want to understand , is it possible in SAP to have a sales document created with different line items (One for the material returned from the customer, one for the Material to be send to the external vendor for repairing , and one for the material to be returned back to customer after repairing)
    Is it possible to have this proposal automatically based on return reason in SAP ?
    Kindly Advise.
    Regards,
    Harsh

    Hi Harsh,
    I think you are trying to amalgamate 3 processes which is quite ambitious by all means :). However in my past experience we have been able to track these articles but playing around using the standards. Customer return was a process through which an article was brought in a seperate storage location for repair and was sent out for repair using sub contracting process, after repair it was again sent out to the customer with the sales process. Of course there were quite a few physical processes that were needed to support this. We started to think but than refrained ourselves from using batches and serial numbers for this.
    Regards
    Kaizad

  • Renewed my Contract Based on Misinformation From Verizon Reps-Any Recourse to Get Out of Contract?

    A few months ago (February or so) I renewed my contract with Verizon and got an iPhone 4S as my previous HTC phone up and died. I knew I was going to be moving to Canada for awhile and so I made sure to ask a lot of questions about their Nationwide+Canada plan and what phones would work in Canada before making any plan or phone purchases. From that point on I was fed different information from every rep I talked to in store, online via chat, and via e-mail. The online rep told me that CDMA phones wouldn't work in Canada so I had to get the iPhone 4S rather than the Galaxy Nexus, which was the phone I was originally interested in. Found out later that's not true—CDMA phones do work in Canada (at least in the part I'll be in; there are some more rural areas where they don't work). That rep also told me that my grandfathered-in unlimited data plan would work in Canada and all I had to do was pay an extra $20/month to get voice and texting coverage in Canada. So, I got the iPhone in the store and renewed my contract based on the information the rep gave me.
    Came to find out later that you need a separate global data plan to get 3G coverage in Canada, which is $25 for a nearly useless 100MB. This isn't made clear at all on the Verizon website for the Nationwide+Canada plan, and I complained about this plus the misinformation I received from the in-store rep, and all Verizon had to say was, "Sorry, but thanks for being a customer." When the time came to actually go to Canada, I switched to the Nationwide+Canada plan to get voice coverage for the time I was there, which I did in a different Verizon store. The rep in that store told me when I signed up that if I used more than a certain percentage of my minutes in Canada vs. the U.S., Verizon would cancel my plan, which is also not mentioned on the website anywhere that I found. She also said that I couldn't suspend my account for the entire time I'd be in Canada because it's longer than their suspension limits, although she admitted she didn't know how long the limit was off the top of her head and I couldn't find an exact number on the Verizon website.
    So, I was fed a bunch of conflicting information from multiple Verizon reps that led me to renewing my contract. Do I have any recourse to get out of it? I'm really disappointed because I've never had trouble with Verizon until now.

    Apparently I'm not the only person who's been fed conflicting information from various Verizon reps when it comes to coverage in Canada: https://community.verizonwireless.com/message/237079#237079
    When I initially e-mailed Verizon about this issue, I told them that if their own employees don't understand what the company offers, then how are the customers supposed to understand?
    It just doesn't seem right to have to pay the ETF when I only renewed my contract because I was given incorrect information by more than one rep. If I'd been given the correct information, I wouldn't have gotten a new phone that required a new 2-year contract.

  • Select Contracts based on Ship-to Party

    Hi all,
    I have created two contracts of type ZCQ (VA41) with the following soldto and shipto party values.
    Contract 1: soldto1, shipto1
    Contract 2: soldto1, shipto2
    <b>Now I need to retrieve contracts, based on a search criteria consisting of Sold-to party and Ship-to party. i.e If I enter soldto1 and shipto1 I need to get back Contract 1 and if I enter soldto1 and shipto2 i need to get back contract 2.</b>
    Which is the field that I need to use to search for the Ship to value?
    Right now I am selecting based on VBAK-KUNNR for Sold to party. But am not able to figure out where the Ship to party value will be stored during the contract creation. So now my query returns both the contracts, no matter what the value of Ship to search field is
    Any pointers regarding this ( table, field, logic) would be really helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Reena

    "See u are maintaining ship to party for the Contracts . so what table it is storing in "
    This is exactly what Im trying to figure out.
    I am creating contracts using VA41 for a particular value of soldto party and shipto party.
    After I craete the contracts, I am trying to retrieve these contracts based on the soldto and ship to party values that I had entered. Now, I dont know where the ship-to party is getting stored. 
    I am not making any mapping for the ship to party. I am currently trying with just VBAK and VBAP, since I dont know if I should use any other table.
    Data that I have in hand: Sold to Party, Ship to Party and Auart (ZCQ).
    Example to make it more clear
    Contract1: Soldto Party - 100042, Shipto Party - 100042
    Contract2: Soldto Party- 100042, Shipto Party - 100055
    Auart - ZCQ for both
    Now in my input parameters, when I eneter 100042 for soldto party and 100042 for ship tp party, i get back contract1 and contract2. But I just want contract 1.
    Similarly for the second scenario.
    Hope I have not confused you. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Reena

  • Contracts based on Material Groups....

    Can we create Contracts based on material Group?
    Like We want to create a contract for Material Group Casting. We want to negotiate terms for Material Group & then procure the part.
    How do we do this?
    Thanks Anupam

    Create a Quantiy Contract with Item Category 'M'- Material Unknown.
    Then create PO refering to this contract.
    System asks for material number or AAC. It also checks the material group against the one in the contract.
    By defaut a warning message is issued if material groups do not match (message MEPO074).
    This can be set to 'E' in customising but SAP gives a warning when you trying to set this message as error.
    Customising path: SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Environment>Define attributes of system messages.
    It is also possible to code this check in PO user exit and issue a custom message.

  • If I buy an iPhone 4S (the unlocked and contract-free version), do I need to add a microSIM card if I just want to use it as an iPod Touch?

    If I buy an iPhone 4S (the unlocked and contract-free version), do I need to add a microSIM card if I just want to use it as, essentially, an iPod Touch? I'll probably get a microSIM card eventually, but I just need the wi-fi based technology now. Anyone know?

    It will not do anything (other than call 911) until you activate it with a microSIM. Look into an iPod Touch instead.

  • Dynamically passing text and url-based images as an input parameter to cf8 report builder

    I'm unsuccessfully trying to dynamically pass text and url-based images to a group footer or the detail section via an input parameter or even hardcoded. The field has the attribute 'XHTML Text Formating' set to True. The following are failed samples of a simplified value:
    "<img height=’300’ alt=’Document’ width=’300’ src=’http://www.google.com/intl/en_ALL/images/logo.gif’ />"
    or
    "<img src=’http://www.google.com/intl/en_ALL/images/logo.gif’ />"
    This just results in the above text being output. The end result would have various text and images from a database as input by a user, thus the reason I cannot just use the hyperlink information attribute as I could if it were a single known image. I tried rtf and pdf report types. Ideas?

    HTH,
    Thanks. I'll keep that in mind, although I don't know how many images my user might need or what sizes so that might be tricky.
    Since my target output is rtf so that MS Word can be used to edit the result, I added a pagebreak to a MS Word doc and used the resulting html source to replace the rich text editor source code for the page break, but that did not help either. The page break was so a user could add an image later. Something is wrong with the Report Builder related to intepreting XHTML, especially anything that has an attribute, including URL-based image links. I hope they try to provide another update before CF9. I doubt my client will be going to CF9 for some time, since they are just completing the migration to CF8.
    BrianO

  • PO output messages control based on the reason code

    HI,
    The requirement is to generate the PO output message based on the value of 'Reason for change' code. suppose
    Ex:generate the output if the reason code is 2.
    I know there is a way to control the message output by defining the 'fields relevant to printout of changes' in SPRO. But we are not going to use this option.
    I have to control the output based on the Reason code. Please let me know.
    Regards,
    Nishant

    Hi Nishant,
    I will give you another input. This should be your last option. As mentioned above, you need to create an implicit enhancement in the following class method and export the content of the internal table MY_TABLE which contains the current values of the versions.
    Class - CL_GRID_VIEW_MM , Method - HANDLE_ON_DATA_CHANGED
    Then you import the same in your exit.
    Regards,
    Abijith

  • Contract terminated for billing reasons flag did not remove

    Hi
    We have a critical problem.
    We are using SAP ISU 4.72 version with CRM 4.0.
    Sometimes when user is doing final bill reversal and moveout reversal from CRM, the flag "Contract terminated for billing reasons" (EVER-BILLFINIT) in SAP ISU is not removing automatically and this gives problem for further billing of the contract.
    Can anyone suggest a solution for this problem that how to correct this problem or any notes to be applied to correct this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Satadal

    Hi Olivia
    I have already checked this note. It seems that this note is for manual billing problem which is not carried out here.
    In our case if we are doing in SAP, the removal of flag is happening with reversal of final bill.
    But sometimes when we are doing through CRM the reversal process, sometimes this flag is not deleting.
    I am not very sure whether it is an ISU issue or this issue happens only from CRM.
    Thanks for your help anyway
    Regards
    Satadal

  • Business Flows for Sales and Contracts process

    Hi,
    I needs Business Flows for sales and contracts process for my project.
    Does anybody knows where i can find these BFA ?
    Thanks
    Regards
    Mehdi

    Hi mehdi;
    Please check below and see its helpful:
    R12 Responsibilities And Roles Based On Business Flows [ID 406401.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Create URL,Telephone number as paramater Account Search and result based on parameter of telephone number ?

    Hi Experts,
    create URL,Telephone number as paramater Account Search and result based on parameter of telephone number ?..
    Previous my thread was locked...Now i want to say thanks to KALYANI L and Richa Dameja,..Now This code i have followed now its working fine..Thanks Great help to Kalyani L..and Richa Dameja.. i have implemented the DO_INIT_CONTEXT.....Now getting result...
    As suggest Kalyani L i have implemented DO_INTI_CONTEXT method,Now its working fine....
    Thanks For support.
    Thanks
    kalpana
    Message was edited by: Andrei Vishnevsky
    Disussion is locked.
    Reason: Re: create URL,Telephone number as paramater Account Search and result based on parameter of telephone number ?

    Hello Kalpana,
    I've already locked your previous discussion and thought that I gave pretty clear warning.
    First of all "do my job" posts are not welcomed on SCN.
    Second point: you're incorrect in choosing SCN space with such questions. Here is a little which is related to IC in your task.
    Third point is that if somebody has an answer to your exact question then he will give you it if he wants. There is no reason to post-post-post messages asking for help or hurry. Your "urgent requirement" is not the reason either.
    Fourth one is: according to The SCN Rules of Engagement you need to do the search before posting. Almost all of your questions regarding this topic has an answer already.
    Locking the discussion again. If you continue to post such questions I will need to report this situation to SAP CRM space editors and global moderators.

  • No Range for Contract Offer and Contract

    Hi Experts,
    I have to Give the no range to contract offer and contact as per the contract type. We have three contract type 1) Factory LO 2) Land LO AND Building LO.
    Kindly guide me how to give no range to contract offer and contract. Waiting for your reply
    Regards,
    Manzoor

    Hi,
    You can maintain number ranges based on the contract types, it is available in config of contract types.
    To maintain different number ranges for contract offer basing on the type of contract, you can use BADI BADI_REOR_OFFER and method IF_EX_REOR_OFFER~GET_NUMBER     Determine Contract Offer Number with Int. Number Assignment
    Srini

  • Populate multiple rows and columns based off of a single cell

    Does anyone know a way to populate multiple rows and columns based off of the input of a single cell. I'm trying to create a workout tracker that auto populates from a master list of workouts. Example, in A2 the user selects the workout from a drop down menu (St1, St2, St3, etc) and the workout is pulled from the master list and is populated into B2:C5.
    I'm using =LOOKUP(A2,Master :: A2:A32,Master :: C2:C32) right now, but it's only drawing the top column. I'm looking for an edit for the formula (or completely new formula) that will place the info from the 1st column of the Master table into the 1st column of the Auto Tracker 1 table and then on down until the 4th column.
    Here is a screen shot of what I have now:
    And an example of what I'd like to accomplish:
    Any and all help is appreciated, and please let me know if there is any more info that I can give that'd help out.

    Hi Mike,
    Your screenshots show that you have merged some cells in Column A of both tables. That may be the reason why the LOOKUP function is having trouble working out which range of cells to examine.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ian.

Maybe you are looking for