BPM: Messager Merge - Transformation Mapping Problem

Hi,
I tried an eg for time bound message merging (rather adding the items in the message).
I am using a single datatype/message type.
I was able to do the message mapping/interface mapping test by changing the source by making it 0 to unbounded and on the target I have same message type.
This test was successful.I went ahead with the creating the scenario .I used a file adapter for picking up a file. The message monitor shows it is picked it and sent to the bpm.
but the bpm part failed I checked in bpe monitor.It just says the mapping failed(transformation step).prior to which there is a receive step and container operation step which I used it for append the message .these are under a block and this block has a infinite loop for collecting the messages.There is a exception thrower(control step) which is for 2 minutes.this handled by a exception handler.and I guess my file was collected and send to the transformation step after this.but the thing is it never seems to appended since the two files are shown as two seperate error messages in transformation rather than as single ...
Can somebody tell what could be the problem/where to look for the file.
THnks

I am getting more and more sure that the problem is at the block entry only...becoz i checked with direct entry to loop with a counter as loop breaker.it entered the loop and added the lines to the message with multiple lines.and once it hit the counter it came out and did the transformation successfully and sent it to the target system.
when i add the block it fail right at the block entry for the first message after that all the messages show the green flag clicking on pe would show an empty queue...
I guess the only step happening before the block is the correlation key creation i amn't sure if this is giving some problems..
NOW FOR THE BPM Steps....
1.I created the correlation key.
2.I put the block for the block i added the correlation key and exception name.
3.I put the exception branch and the deadline branch
4.on the exception branch i put the name of the exception to be handled.
5. on the deadline branch i put a 2 minute duration
6.within the deadline branch i put the control which throws the exception...
7.i added a loop to the block which is 1 = 1.in that there is a recieve step
8.after that there is container operation which adds the message to the list...
9.followed by outside the block i have a transformation and send steps..
10.the block is in default mode.
I tried creating the scenario completely again and again with different datatype etc to avoid the cache problem + workflow item locked problem...
but no luckk
THNks

Similar Messages

Transformation Mapping Problem.

Dear BI Experts,
In 0FIAR_O03 to 0FIAR_C03 transformation mapping between 0DOC_DATE to 0CLAMONTH getting below error.
Rule 58 (target field: 0CALMONTH, group: Standard Group): Info Object properties 0CALMONTH
Message no. RSTRAN525
Diagnosis
The properties of the Info Object selected, 0CALMONTH, do not match the properties of the available source field.
But in 3.5 update rule we are not getting any error. How to overcome transformation problem?
And in 0FIAP_O03 to 0FIAP_C03 transformation 0DOC_DATE to 0CLAMONTH mapping done successfully.
Getting data also.
Why problem in 0FIAR transformation?
Please give any solution.
Regards
Ramu

Hi
Is there is any routine was involved in that transformation , may it was stopping to see the actual data, or some time when you migrate from 3.x flow to bi 7.0 flow you will face the transformation ask your abap guy to dedug the transformation so that you can easily now where the exact problem lies.
Regards
Madan Mohan

BPM - Message merge

Hi,
I am trying merge sales orders from 2 of our systems. I get an XML idoc from my R/3 system and a partial sales order doc from my other leagacy system in XML format. I want to combine these into a single sales order and send it out in an ecxXML format to a customer. I am running WAS 6.40 and using XI 3.0. Is BPM the solution, if so How can I proceed???
Any help is appreciated.
-Kenneth

Hi Durga,
Following on that message mapping for 2 input messages, do u mean that the schema for both incoming messages be imported(or combined) into one schema like an addon( does XI 3.0 allow it ) or they should be done outside and then imported as one combined schema??
And there should be an end condition in BPM when we are forking the message to combine the 2 business processes. What would be an ideal end condition( eg. here its sales orders coming from 2 systems)...
-Teresa

Message merge mapping fail in execution

Hi,
I try to merge two different messages into one with a business process using the merge pattern. When I test the mapping in the integration builder the mapping works. During the runtime I get a mapping error "Cannot produce target element <Target Message Type Root Element>" or it creates a emty result message without any content.
It looks like a timedependency.
Anyone solve a similar problem ?
Regards,
Gerald

Hi,
First test the mapping in the Repository with the input xml from the SXMB_MONI.
Test the N:1 Mapping also in the repository with the Runtime payload.
Did you check the multiline option in the BPM ? Otherwise check it. Also , I hope you have changed the Messages occurence ( Under Mapping->Messages Tab) also in the Interface Mapping..
For more~
Interface Mappings in BPM Collect Pattern
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Moorthy

Multiple source messages in transformation step in bpm

Hello,
I am using a transformation step in bpm, I have two source messages and 1 target message, I got an error 'expression must return the interface type XXXX(in source message)', I checked my source message in interface mapping and the container element, the types do match.
All the interfaces in the OM as well as in the bpm container definition are of type abstract.
It seems to have something to do with the interfaces belonging to different software components?
I declared a usage dependency from one swcv (holding the bpm) to another (holding the abstract interfaces which cause the error in the transformation step), so that I can reference them in the bpm.
I thought it might have something to do on how the message interfaces are selected in the operation mapping. so I tried to select the messages through the depencency path, but that was of no help either.
Have I been clear?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Matthias

Since no receiver information is available in the transformation step, there can be no value mapping within the transformation step. If the messages to be transformed give values in different formats, for example different date formats, you must first normalize the values before the messages can be processed in the process. To do so, define a message mapping with a corresponding value mapping.
Check the help page below for reference
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/27/db283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm

BPM Message Mapping: "Cannot produce target element /ns1:BAPI...."

Hi,
A scenario File - BPM - BAPI call was developed, as described in blog 'RFC scenario using BPM' cfr. link
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
The Mapping is as follows:
MT_EDB_MATERIAL_REQ (1:1) --> BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCE_CHECK (1:1)
MATNR (1:1) -
> MATERIAL (1:1)
When executing the scenario, an error appears in the trace of SXMB_MONI, step 'Request Message Mapping'
Cannot produce target element /ns1:BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCECHECK. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd....
I tried the following:
1) import the XML-file into the testmapping: executed successfully
File:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_EDB_MATERIAL_REQ xmlns:ns0="http://agfa.com/SD_EDB">
<MATNR>15P6X</MATNR>
</ns0:MT_EDB_MATERIAL_REQ>
2) Removed the mapping on node level and left mapping only on element level (material): same error
3) Activated the message mapping, interface mapping, determinations, etc again...:same error
4) Removed the Interface Mapping and created it again: same error
5) Compared the version ID of the Interface Mapping/message mapping in the Monitor trace with the version ID of the IR and saw that there was a difference.
After the CPA full cache, SXI_CACHE full refresh and object refresh in the IB Administration, the differences remain, and also the error....
Anybody an idea ?

Hi
>>>Cannot produce target element /ns1:BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCECHECK. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd....
The error clearly says that one of the occurrence value for the target node mentioned is not coming from the source during mapping. The easiest way to solve the problem is as follows
<b>
First Execute the mapping as pointed out by "Raj" and the following steps.
</b>
1. Goto the Mapping Editor
2. Double click on the target node that is causing the problem here BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCECHECK.
3. Right click on the same node and select "DisplayQueue".
4. View the Queue.
5. YOu will find "Suppress" entries, which means a value is expected but no value is coming in.
6.Go from right to left and check each node in the mapping and you will be able to trace where the suppress node comes from and take appropriate action
regards
krishna

BPM : Message interface is not used by this process

Hi,
In BPM : to pass the message facing error as below.
Messages not reflecting in BPM monitor.
I have configured Recveiver - transformation - sender in BPM.
In recvier in BPM is configured with Abstract Type as same in the message mapping.
Is there any thing i am missing?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">MESSAGE_NOT_USED</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Message interface is not used by this process</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I have refered links but not able to get the clue for this error as its from the Call adapter.
error: Message interface is not used by this process Netweaver PI 7.0
BPE_ADAPTER: MESSAGE_NOT_USED
Regards,

Hi,
I just saw your IP design and from this I can see that you have message mapping between Sender(as in Outbound interface MIOASY) and abstract interface (as in MIAASY) and then in that you have used transformation step to utilise Interface mapping which is between same abstract interface which is not required at all as message type for both the interfaces is same. For me, what your configuration would be is
1. Sender agreement to fetch the message from outbound interface(MIOASY) utilising communication channel with whatever adapter you have used
2. Receiver Determination with Sender and sender interface as MIOASY while receiver as IP(Integration process)
3. Interface determination between
    a. Sender and Outbound interface and Abstract interface with interface mapping IM_Sender
    b. IP as sender with abstract interface MIAASY and receiver interface MIIASY with no interface mapping being used as it must be of same type as receiver interface is
4. Receiver agreement with MIIASY being used as receiver interface and communication channel utlililsed to convert it into receiver format.
If I am assuming it correct then if you see then inside BPM we are not using receiver interface MIIASY which is why I feel this error is coming.
However, if you design it something like this then I feel the error would get resolved
Design
1. Make one abstract interface (MIAASY_Sen) of same type as sender, and create another abstract interface (MIAASY_Rec) of same type as your receiver message type
2. Create message mapping between sender message type and receiver message type, Interface mapping IM_ABS - (MM_ABS_ABS) between sender abstract interface (MIAASY_Sen) and receiver abstract interface (MIAASY_Rec)
3. BPM should be something like this
   Container:*
rec Abstract Interface MIAASY_Sen
send Abstract Interface MIAASY_Rec
Receiver (rec) - Transformation (IM_ABS) - sender (send)
Configuration
1. Sender agreement to fetch the message from outbound interface(MIOASY) utilising communication channel with whatever adapter you have used
2. Receiver Determination with Sender and sender interface as MIOASY while receiver as IP(Integration process)
3. Interface determination between
    a. Sender,Outbound interface MIOASY and Abstract interface MIAASY_Sen with no interface mapping
   b. IP as sender with abstract interface MIAASY_Rec and receiver interface MIIASY with no interface mapping being used as it is of same type as receiver interface is
4. Receiver agreement with MIIASY being used as receiver interface and communication channel utlililsed to convert it into receiver format.
Let me know if it works.
Regards,
Amit

Mapping problem with compressed key update record

Hi, could you please advise?
I'm getting the following problem:
About a week ago replicat abened with "Error in mapping" error. I found in discard file some record looking like:
filed1 = NULL
field2 =
field3 =
field4 =
field5 =
datefield = -04-09 00:00:00
field6 =
field8 =
field9 = NULL
field10 =
Where filed9 = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAM"), field10 = = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAM"), others are table fields mapped by USEDEFAULTS
So I got Mapping problem with compressed key update record at 2012-06-01 15:44
I guess I need to mention that extract failed in 5 minuts before it with: VAM function VAMRead returned unexpected result: error 600 - VAM Client Report <[CFileInfo::Read] Timeout expired after 10 retries with 1000 ms delay, waiting to read transaction log or backup files. To increase the number of retries, use SETENV (GGS_CacheRetryCount = n) in Extract parameter file. To control retry delay time, use SETENV (GGS_CacheRetryDelay = n). handle: 0000000000000398 ReadFile GetLastError:997 Wait GetLastError:997>.
I don't know if it has ther same source as data corruption, could you tell me if it is?
Well, I created new extract, starting 2012-06-01 15:30 to check if there was something with extract at the time, but got the same error.
If I run extract beging at 15:52 it starts and works.
But well, I got another one today. Data didn't look that bad, but yet one column came with null value:( And I'm using it as a key column, so I got Mapping problem with compressed key update record again:(
I'm replicating from SQL Server 2008 to Oracle 11g.
I'm actually using NOCOMPRESSUPDATES in Extract.
CDC is enabled for all tables replicated. The only thing is that it is enabled not by ADD TRANDATA command, but by SQL Server sys.sp_cdc_enable_table, does it matter?
Could you please advise why does it happen?

Well, the problem begins somewhere in extract or before extract, may be in transaction log, I don't know:(
Here are extract parameters:
EXTRACT ETCHECK
TRANLOGOPTIONS MANAGESECONDARYTRUNCATIONPOINT
SOURCEDB TEST, USERID **, PASSWORD *****
exttrail ./dirdat/ec
NOCOMPRESSUPDATES
NOCOMPRESSDELETES
TABLE tst.table1, COLS (field1, field2, field3, field4, field5, field6, field7, field8 );
TABLE tst.table2, COLS (field1, field2, field3, field4 );
Data pump:
EXTRACT DTCHECK
SOURCEDB TEST, USERID **, PASSWORD *****
RMTHOST ***, MGRPORT 7809
RMTTRAIL ./dirdat/dc
TABLE tst.table1;
TABLE tst.table2;
Replicat:
REPLICAT rtcheck
USERID tst, PASSWORD ***
DISCARDFILE ./dirrpt/rtcheck.txt, PURGE
SOURCEDEFS ./dirdef/sourcei.def
HANDLECOLLISIONS
UPDATEDELETES
MAP tst.table1, t.table1, COLMAP (USEDEFAULTS , filed9 = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAMP"), filed10= @CASE(@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE"), "SQL COMPUPDATE", "U", "PK UPDATE", "U",@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE")) ), KEYCOLS (field3);
MAP dbo.TPROCPERIODCONFIRMSTAV, TARGET R_019_000001.TPROCPERIODCONFIRMSTAV, COLMAP (USEDEFAULTS , field5 = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAMP"), filed6= @CASE(@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE"), "SQL COMPUPDATE", "U", "PK UPDATE", "U",@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE")) ), KEYCOLS (filed1, field2, field3);
Rpt file for replicat:
Oracle GoldenGate Delivery for Oracle
Version 11.1.1.1 OGGCORE_11.1.1_PLATFORMS_110421.2040
Windows x64 (optimized), Oracle 11g on Apr 22 2011 00:34:07
Copyright (C) 1995, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Starting at 2012-06-05 12:49:38
Operating System Version:
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 , on x64
Version 6.1 (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)
Process id: 2264
Description:
** Running with the following parameters **
REPLICAT rtcheck
USERID tst, PASSWORD ***
DISCARDFILE ./dirrpt/rtcheck.txt, PURGE
SOURCEDEFS ./dirdef/sourcei.def
HANDLECOLLISIONS
UPDATEDELETES
MAP tst.table1, t.table1, COLMAP (USEDEFAULTS , filed9 = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAMP"), filed10= @CASE(@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE"), "SQL COMPUPDATE", "U", "PK UPDATE", "U",@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE")) ), KEYCOLS (field3);
MAP dbo.TPROCPERIODCONFIRMSTAV, TARGET R_019_000001.TPROCPERIODCONFIRMSTAV, COLMAP (USEDEFAULTS , field5 = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAMP"), filed6= @CASE(@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE"), "SQL COMPUPDATE", "U", "PK UPDATE", "U",@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE")) ), KEYCOLS (filed1, field2, field3);
CACHEMGR virtual memory values (may have been adjusted)
CACHEBUFFERSIZE: 64K
CACHESIZE: 512M
CACHEBUFFERSIZE (soft max): 4M
CACHEPAGEOUTSIZE (normal): 4M
PROCESS VM AVAIL FROM OS (min): 1G
CACHESIZEMAX (strict force to disk): 881M
Database Version:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
Database Language and Character Set:
NLS_LANG = "AMERICAN_AMERICA.CL8MSWIN1251"
NLS_LANGUAGE = "AMERICAN"
NLS_TERRITORY = "AMERICA"
NLS_CHARACTERSET = "CL8MSWIN1251"
For further information on character set settings, please refer to user manual.
** Run Time Messages **
Opened trail file ./dirdat/dc000000 at 2012-06-05 12:49:39
2012-06-05 12:58:14 INFO OGG-01020 Processed extract process RESTART_ABEND record at seq 0, rba 925 (aborted 0 records).
MAP resolved (entry tst.table1):
MAP tst.table1, t.table1, COLMAP (USEDEFAULTS , filed9 = @GETENV("GGHEADER", "COMMITTIMESTAMP"), filed10= @CASE(@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE"), "SQL COMPUPDATE", "U", "PK UPDATE", "U",@GETENV("GGHEADER", "OPTYPE")) ), KEYCOLS (field3);
2012-06-05 12:58:14 WARNING OGG-00869 No unique key is defined for table table1. All viable columns will be used to represent the key, but may not guarantee uniqueness. KEYCOLS may be used to define the key.
Using the following default columns with matching names:
field1=field1, field2=field2, field3=field3, field4=field4, field5=field5, field6=field6, field7=field7, field8=field8
Using the following key columns for target table R_019_000001.TCALCULATE: field3.
2012-06-05 12:58:14 WARNING OGG-01431 Aborted grouped transaction on 'tst.table1', Mapping error.
2012-06-05 12:58:14 WARNING OGG-01003 Repositioning to rba 987 in seqno 0.
2012-06-05 12:58:14 WARNING OGG-01151 Error mapping from tst.table1 to tst.table1.
2012-06-05 12:58:14 WARNING OGG-01003 Repositioning to rba 987 in seqno 0.
Source Context :
SourceModule : [er.main]
SourceID : [er/rep.c]
SourceFunction : [take_rep_err_action]
SourceLine : [16064]
ThreadBacktrace : [8] elements
: [C:\App\OGG\replicat.exe(ERCALLBACK+0x143034) [0x00000001402192B4]]
: [C:\App\OGG\replicat.exe(ERCALLBACK+0x11dd44) [0x00000001401F3FC4]]
: [C:\App\OGG\replicat.exe(<RCALLBACK+0x11dd44) [0x000000014009F102]]
: [C:\App\OGG\replicat.exe(<RCALLBACK+0x11dd44) [0x00000001400B29CC]]
: [C:\App\OGG\replicat.exe(<RCALLBACK+0x11dd44) [0x00000001400B8887]]
: [C:\App\OGG\replicat.exe(releaseCProcessManagerInstance+0x25250) [0x000000014028F200]]
: [C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll(BaseThreadInitThunk+0xd) [0x000000007720652D]]
: [C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll(RtlUserThreadStart+0x21) [0x000000007733C521]]
2012-06-05 12:58:14 ERROR OGG-01296 Error mapping from tst.table1 to tst.table1.
* ** Run Time Statistics ** *
Last record for the last committed transaction is the following:
Trail name : ./dirdat/dc000000
Hdr-Ind : E (x45) Partition : . (x04)
UndoFlag : . (x00) BeforeAfter: A (x41)
RecLength : 249 (x00f9) IO Time : 2012-06-01 15:48:56.285333
IOType : 115 (x73) OrigNode : 255 (xff)
TransInd : . (x03) FormatType : R (x52)
SyskeyLen : 0 (x00) Incomplete : . (x00)
AuditRBA : 44 AuditPos : 71176199289771
Continued : N (x00) RecCount : 1 (x01)
2012-06-01 15:48:56.285333 GGSKeyFieldComp Len 249 RBA 987
Name: DBO.TCALCULATE
Reading ./dirdat/dc000000, current RBA 987, 0 records
Report at 2012-06-05 12:58:14 (activity since 2012-06-05 12:58:14)
From Table tst.table1 to tst.table1:
# inserts: 0
# updates: 0
# deletes: 0
# discards: 1
Last log location read:
FILE: ./dirdat/dc000000
SEQNO: 0
RBA: 987
TIMESTAMP: 2012-06-01 15:48:56.285333
EOF: NO
READERR: 0
2012-06-05 12:58:14 ERROR OGG-01668 PROCESS ABENDING.
Discard file:
Oracle GoldenGate Delivery for Oracle process started, group RTCHECK discard file opened: 2012-06-05 12:49:39
Key column filed3 (0) is missing from update on table tst.table1
Missing 1 key columns in update for table tst.table1.
Current time: 2012-06-05 12:58:14
Discarded record from action ABEND on error 0
Aborting transaction on ./dirdat/dc beginning at seqno 0 rba 987
error at seqno 0 rba 987
Problem replicating tst.table1 to tst.table1
Mapping problem with compressed key update record (target format)...
filed1 = NULL
field2 =
field3 =
field4 =
field5 =
datefield = -04-09 00:00:00
field6 =
field8 =
field9 = NULL
field10 =
Process Abending : 2012-06-05 12:58:14

System error message while using maps check in

today i got a lot of system error messages while using maps check in feature, and i tried everything from factory default to reinstalling mobile software and formating everything and yet nothing changed idk what to do and i use the maps application a lot of times so i need this problem fixed please
am using Nokia 500 btw

today i got a lot of system error messages while using maps check in feature, and i tried everything from factory default to reinstalling mobile software and formating everything and yet nothing changed idk what to do and i use the maps application a lot of times so i need this problem fixed please
am using Nokia 500 btw

Multi mapping problem

Hi All,
I tried a simple BPM with a transformation step involved. I have done a multi mapping here. One source msg to 2 target msgs.When I test the mapping using test tab with the incoming payload from SXMB_MONI, I am getting 2 msgs as expected. But during runtime, this is not happening.
These are the output msgs I am getting. It does not have any node in it. The second msg doesnot even have a closing tag for namespace.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns:MT_TGT xmlns:ns="urn:bpm:file:2rec">
<Header />
</ns:MT_TGT>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns:MT_RECR xmlns:ns="urn:bpm:file:2rec" />
Any pointers on this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Jai Shankar.

Hi Bhavesh,
Yes. I checked the source msg in BPM container element. I tested the mapping with thet payload. It is working fine. I can see the source payload in container element as expected. But the MESSAGES_OUT has 2 msgs in the format I pasted above.
Thanks & Regards,
Jai Shankar.

Mapping Problem ORDERS Idoc to Edifact

Hi,
I have a mapping problem with the IDOC ORDERS:
I get the IDOC with several E1EDP01. Each E1EDP01 has several E1EDPT1, where i want only the first one (which I get over the TDID value). Each E1EDPT1 has min. 1 E1EDPT2.
Now I have to map each field TDLINE from first two E1EDPT2 of the first E1EDPT1 to the Edifact fields /LIST/S_UNB/S_UNH/G_SSG25/S_LIN/S_IMD[1]/C_C273/D_7008 (from the first E1EDPT2) and, if a second E1EDPT2 exists in /LIST/S_UNB/S_UNH/G_SSG25/S_LIN/S_IMD[1]/C_C273/D_7008_2.
I use following UDF:
//a = TDLINE
//b = Number of entry in the List
int pos =Integer.parseInt(b[0]);
if ( pos < a.length )
result.addValue(a[pos]);
else
result.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
Unfortunatly, I think becaus of the context problems (not every E1EDPT1 has two E1EDPT2), it's not working. Could somebody help me with this problem?
Thanks in advance
Dominic

Dear Dominic ,
I had same problem when I was trying to do the same thing for FTX segment.
Your UDF is fine but you don't need else condition.
//a = TDLINE
//b = Number of entry in the List
int pos =Integer.parseInt(b[0]);
if ( pos < a.length )
result.addValue(a[pos]);
for C_C273 assigned contant value and
D_7008 assigned TDLINE but change the context to E1EDPT1
and for D_7008_2
TDLINE(context to E1EDPT1 )
====>UDF====>D_7008_2
Contant(=1)
It should work becasue my map is working fine. If not let me know error message.
Thanks
Shubhankar

JDBC- XI- File Mapping Problem

Hi everyone,
I have the mapping problem. atried a lot of possibilities, but unfortunately nothing helps... JDBC adapter returns (in my case - I'm just selecting SYSDATE from dual) this structure
<resultset>
<row>
<SYSDATE>....</SYSDATE>
</row>
</resultset>
I'm using 2 datatypes:
a, row (it is called so) which is complextype and consists of subelement SYSDATE, which is string
Exastly: row->SYSDATE
b, resultset (it is called so) is complex type which consists of subelement of type row(type a - see above) (and this subelement is also called row) ...and it has of course subelement SYSDATE, which is String (see the data type a above)
Exactly: resultset->row->SYSDATE
The data type b is used for the outbound interface in the message coming from the JDBC Adapter, the type a is used for message type sent into the File Adapter
(exactly: Message1String is the ResutSet Type(b), Message1String2 is the Row(a) type)
Can somebody help me, what is wrong? I do always get mapping error... :O(
Thanx, Peter

So your message type has a different name?
Take the name of your message type and link this to "document name" of your JDBC adapter configuration.
Compare the xml output of the JDBC adapter (take this from the SXMB_MONI payload) with the default structure of the mapping (go to the mapping tool, test mode, create a new test and view the xml structure)
Regards
Stefan

Help on message split ABAP MAPPING

Hi friends
I need to split a message by abap mapping , I am having problem while creating the tag Messages and Message1.
the mapping is going into error Comparison error during the execution of a simple
it is turned up to be the issue of <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"><ns0:Message1> not being created correct
I am using this code
CALL METHOD l_document->create_simple_element_ns
      EXPORTING
        name   = 'Messages'
        parent = l_document
*u2022PREFIX = ''
*u2022URI = ''
*u2022VALUE = ''
      RECEIVING
        rval   = Messagesnode.
CALL METHOD l_document->create_simple_element_ns
      EXPORTING
        name   = 'Message1'
        parent = MESSAGESNODE
*u2022PREFIX = ''
*u2022URI = ''
*u2022VALUE = ''
      RECEIVING
        rval   = Message1node.
any help wil do
Thanks

No answer
Thanks

Trigger new message, wenn SXMB_MONI Message is red (mapping-error)

Hi everybody,
is there any chance to trigger another message if an mapping-error occured?
(I do not want to use BPM for the exception handling).
We are sending IDOCs to XI, just in gthe case, that the mapping throws an error I want to send a SYSTAT-IDoc back.
Thanks
Regards Mario

It would be very complicated to achive the Fault message with IDOC without BPM.
There is one way that probably you could try,
The SXMB_MONI contains the trace log for every message based on the steps processed in the interface.
You caould try to add the checkpoints at these steps e.g.
1. In Receiver determination, there is option to route the message to different receiver if the receiver system is missing in Receiver determination.
2. Can design the Adapter module to catch the exceptions with the connectivity with Sender / Receiver systems and handle it to raise any alert notification.
These kind of alternative ways have to be used to achive the requirments.
Note : I am not sure how much it will be feasible for the replacement of BPM.
Thanks
Swarup

[svn:fx-trunk] 10229: Fixes for some transform effects problems.

Revision: 10229
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-09-14 08:43:43 -0700 (Mon, 14 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
Fixes for some transform effects problems.
- We were not animating the postLayout properties in some cases where we should have, effectively pinning the object in place. We now animate those properties whenever applyChangesPostLayout is true.
- A copy/paste error meant that we did not animate the scaleZ property in cases where we should have.
- A problem in the transform code means that using a null transform center is not the same as a transform center which uses the transformX/Y/Z properties of the target object. We now force the creation/use of a transform center in all cases to avoid that problem.
QE notes: This breaks about a dozen tests in the transform effects area, but I believe the new results are correct and the tests/bitmaps should be changed.
Doc notes: None
Bugs: sdk-23177
Reviewer: Hans
Tests run: checkintests, Mustella transform effects
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-23177
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/AnimateTransform.as

BPM: Messager Merge - Transformation Mapping Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for