Budget check for PM orders with main and sub-projects

Hello
We have a scenario wherein we have created a main project and a sub-project. We have linked the sub-project to main project. We have also assigned budget to the main project. We have created a PM order wherein we are trying to enter the costs by entering the hours of work. We have configured the budget profile and set the tolerance limites and assigned to main project. The requirement here is we need to have have costs check againt the budget that been available in the main project. But the system is checking the budget of the sub-project. Please share if any specific setting is required to check the budget of main project instea sub-project.
Regards,
Basav

I also double checked, you are right there is no forum for PM, I dont think I could suggest much since there isnt a dedicated forum, but you can try posting this query in the ABAP forum probably some abap'r who has worked with PM module should have a look. Also if possible try to connect with one of the moderators out here and ask for assistance in starting something for PM
Thanks,
GLM

Similar Messages

Budget check for purchase order

Hi everyone!
We have NO problems with budget check for the SC. But when we create a PO and exceeds the budget no message are displayed. The only thing that happens is that the PO gets status "error in process". But if we change the PO (still exceeding budget) we receive a correct message. Is this a program error?
Sincerely
Anders

Hi
Temporarily deactivate budget check: SRM: using Badi
BBP_BUDGET_CHECK, AVC Backend customizing.
Did you do budget check while creating sc? what did it says?
Refere this old notes.
Note 740933 - Incorrct purchasing budget for currencies w/o decimal
places
Note 747143 - User purchasing budget in pop-up incorrectly formatted
regards
Muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Nov 5, 2008 3:08 PM

Budget checking for Purchase Order

Hello All Experts,
Project Availability control: Tolerance limits
on All activity groups - warning message for 101%
on Purchase requisition - warning message for 101%
on Purchase Order - error message for 101%
1. Now we created a project with 5000 budget and Availability control activated.
2. We assigned material to activity and created Purchase requisition for 6000. Here system issued message there is error in commitment and allowed us to save the project.
3. We created Purchase order for 6000, system is allowing to create, that is any thing less then PR value, even though it is more than 101% and suppose to give the error.
How do we over come this situation and make the system to look Budget value not the PR Value.
Thanks,
Karthik

Hi,
you have maintained activity groups ++ so system is considering All activity groups first for budget check instead of individual activity groups(PR,PO...). remove the ++ activity group and maintain individually(PR,PO,GI...) and check.
regards

Report for production order with actual and target cost for each

Hi
Is there any report that gives me the list of all production orders in a month with its respective actual and target costs?
I can use COOIS to get a list of production orders, then double click on the prod order, then click on goto and then to cost analyis.. but can i avoid going through all this and get a report with the details i need?
thanks in advance

Thanks a lot for that.
I'm a little confused with the columns in the report.
Which columns should I keep for my requirement? -
Production Order
Total Target Cost
Total Actual Cost
Total Actual Qty
Total Target Qty
Thanks

Why budget check does not work with account assigment distrib. by quantity?

Hi Gurus,
I have an issue in the budget check for Purchase Order (PO).
I'm using the FM B31I_ACC_PURCHASE_ORDER_CHECK.
The case is next:
1 Item with 21 account assignment type AS and distribution by quantity:
ASSET_NO QUANTITY
1           1
2           1
3           1
4           1
5           1
6           1
7           1
8           1
9           1
10          1
11          1
12          1
13          1
14          1
15          1
16          1
17          1
18          1
19          1
20          1
21          1
All account assignment are for the same G/L account, fund, functional area...
The price for each item is $2,499.14, then total price is $52,481.94 (2,499.14 * 21).
I debugged the FM B31I_ACC_PURCHASE_ORDER_CHECK and found that in FM BBP_PD_COMMITMENT_FILL_BAPI it's making a rounding with percentage:
The system assume next:
Each item is 4.76% of total (result of divide 100% / 21 = 4.76190476...) but the percentage is rounded to 2 decimals.
Then it makes the conversion by the amount corresponding to each item:
($52,481.94 * 4.76) / 100 = $2,498.1403
Finally the budget is checked by $52,460.95 (2498.1403 * 21).
But available budget is $52,481.90, the check pass, but really there are 4 cents missing (total price is $52,481.94).
Can somebody say to me if this is a standard behavior?
It can be fixed with configuration?
The problem is for multiple account assignment with distribution by quantity and:
(100 / quantity) = not integer (or have more than 2 decimals)
For example: with quantity 20 it works because 100% / 20 = 5.00%, then the budget is check exactly.

1503317 - System Behavior for Account Distribution between SRM and R/3 system
When using distribution by Value in a SRM document this value is not correct and a rounding occurs once this document is transferred to ERP system.
Cause
It is not possible transfer documents to the back end system with distribution by value, due to a back end restriction.
Resolution
The following information is the system behavior in R/3 / ERP:
in R/3, there is accounting distribution only by quantity or percentage. So when distribution by value is used, a rounding will always take place.
in R/3, the use of value based distribution in SRM will lead to rounding differences.
Distribution by quantity is allowed in SRM and MM side. However MM do not accept is distribution by value. This is internally converted to distribution percentage based.
Keywords
Distribution by Quantity, Distribution by Percentage, Distribution by Value

Simple credit check for service orders(TAD)

hi
we have configured simple credit check for ZOR and with delivery block. since TAD is order related billing even though credit limit exceeds they can bill the customer.Now I have to configure simple credit check for serive orders with item category TAD and it should give billing block.please give me the details on this.

Hello Chait
To release credit block from CRM GUI, please go to header status tab here is the button 'Credit Release'.
To release credit block in WEBUI, please check the items block, in more functions you can find the 'release credit block' link.
Best regards,
Maggie

Budget check for PO based on delivery

Hi,
Can some guide how to configure budget check for purchase order based on supply schedule.
This could be that you have raised a Purchase order for 12 Quantity and the delivery of the same is at 1 per month for 12 months.Budget should be checked for one quantity for one month and not based on Purchase order which is for 12 quantity.
We are using Former budgeting.
Regards,
Gokul

Hi,
I'm afraid you will have to create 12 items within the same PO and assign different delivery date to every one of them; then, the budget will be affected accordingly.
Regards,
Eli

Unable to reduce previous year budget value for particular order

Hi
I am unable to reduce previous year budget value for particular order number in IM52 - process transactions - Returns
The error msg is Overall budget less than cumulative budget
Pls help to solve this issue.
Regards
P Karthikeyan

Hi,
Check the budget distrubuted to the internal orders values is matching with top node or parent node value or not, if that value is not matching with intenal order distrubution value then system will not accept to save.

PGI for both main and sub items (Sales BOM)

Hello SD friends,
I'm trying to map some BOM scenario.
Only main item should be relevant for princing.
Here's what I've done :
1. Create sales BOM via CS01
2. Maintain item category group ERLA for main item and NORM for sub item MM01
3. Maintain item category TAQ for main item and TAE for sub item VOV4
When I wanna do PGI, system creates material document only for main item.
Which means that PGI has not been done for sub items.
Is there any way to make PGI possible for both main and sub items ??
Regards,
Bahia.

Can you clear, that why you want to issue both Main item/Sub Item, where your pricing is @ main item level.
in Main item level Pricing, Main item itself includes components. Once you issue the main item. from Inventory this main item wil be reduced.
Eg: In Case of Main Item- Computer (Assume Components - Monitor , Keyboard , CPU & Mouse)
Price for Computer - $1200. Component prices individually- $300 , $100, $700, $100 - These prices applicable only when you sell as BOM at Subitem level Pricing Or Seperately )-
In SO: - Order Computer (System explodes Components to verify,which are the subitems consists in Main Item)
DEL:- Components will be copied in Delivery , but not for dispatch (Sch Line Cat:CT has these controls)
Inv: Only Main item will be displayed for print.
NOTE: for your requirement, you can change the Schline Category from CT - CN- which is relevant for delivery with movement type i601 -in SO. Then you can dispatch components & these components will not copied into Invoice ,as they are not relevant for billing.
If you want CN has to determined automatically, maintain Schline Category determination accordingly.
Hope it helps,
Any info, please revert

User exit in ATP Check for sales Order to trigger notification

Hi All
please let me know is there any user exit after ATP check or in ATP check for sales order to trigger a notication mail.
Regards
Kishore

Hi,
User Exits For Availability Check are given below:-
The user exits named here are planned for projects that are to be carried out in agreement with SAP development as they may only be used in consultation with SAP.
USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION in program RV03VFZZ is an exception to this rule (see below).
User exits in program FV45VFZZ
USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_HEADER
USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_LINE
User exits in program FV45VFZY
USEREXIT_DELIVERY_GROUPS
USEREXIT_MVERF_INIT
USEREXIT_QUOTA_KEY_VALUE
User exits in program RV03VFZZ
USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN
USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_OUT
USEREXIT_DARA_REFRESH
USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION
This user exit is used to adjust the flow during plant transfer. A list of permitted plants, where this material is created, is determined and checked in the standard R/3 delivery. A dialog box appears where you can select the plants. The user exits allow you to modify the plant table so that plant selection takes place in advance for every flagged selection and a dialog box becomes unnecessary.
regards
Vivek.

WIP calculation for Prod.order with status TECO

Hello all.
My question is the similar to WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV
But I need that
- if the Production order has status TECO - the system calculate WIP
- if the Production order has status DLV u2013 the system settle the order.
1. I try to change u201CStatus Numberu201D in TCODE OKGC. But I have receive two different result:
- if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status DLV from 3 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status DLV u2013 WIP have been calculated.
- but if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status TECO from 4 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status TECO u2013 WIP have been CANSELED.
2. I try to change results analysis key for status TECO from u201CZu201D to u201CFu201D in TCODE OKG3. BUT during WIP calculation the system create error message KJ 363 which require that results analysis key must be change to u201CZu201D
How can I resolve my problem?

Hi,
I don't have the answer if the requirement is that even after producing the materials, till the time accountant checks the order and does this action, it should remain in WIP. Honestly it doesn't make any sense to me or i have not understood this problem. Anyways as per my current understanding I can suggest the following process for your scenario.
Once production is stopped in between the process, the order should be in PDLV status (partial confirmations happened in the order)
Now go and clear the reservations manually from the production order .( delete the component line items from the order). Now depending on whether you are following WIP at actual cost, system will post the difference between credit and debit of that production order as WIP for the month end process.
Once Accountant okays the entries in the production order, he can do the TECO and settle the order. Now WIP will be reversed and variance will be posted.
To avoid the already produced goods mixing up with your other stock, u might want use Quality Management with the help of your PP consultant.
Best Regards
Vimal

Single invoice for multiple orders with different divisions

Dear All,
while I am trying to do single invoice for muliple orders with different divisons invoice is gettting splitted..In copy control vbrk routine I tried with 003 and 007 etc..but result is same..what configuration need to be done for getting the single invoice
Thanks In advance
Regards
CNRNAIR

Hello
single invoice for multiple orders with "different divisions" invoice is getting split
FYI - Different Division means different Sales Area.
So, sales doc (whether sales order, Delivery & Billing) is applicable to EXACTLY one sales area.
Thus, combining docs with different sales area is practically impossible.
Provided, you are using common division.
Hope this assist you,
Thanks & REgards
JP

List of rejected sales order with quantity and value

Hi,
Is it possible to get the report from VA05 for the list of rejected items with value and quantity ?
Pls help
Thanks,
Vijesh

Dear Vijesh,
VA05 I believe is a very powerful report for doing analysis at order and line item level. If your rejection criterion includes a rejection reason at line item level, yes this list from VA05 can give rejected Sales Orders with Quantity and Value. See the screen shot below.
I selected a list with open dates till date, I can see Sales Order number, Sales Document Type, Item Number, Material, Rejection reason, Quantity at line item level and net price.
However, I am not sure what is the rejection criterion you use in your business and I am not sure if you use rejection reason and hence I would like to hear from you, if this explanation helps you.
Thanks
Nagaraj

Table name for sales order with Customer info

Hi Gurus,
Could you please provide me table name for sales order with customer no and customer name.
I have list of sales order number (more than 1000 no's ) i need to identify customer number and customer name (ship to party and sold to party information). I am running this report every week. so i plan to create sqvi for this report.
Thanks and regards,
B.Deethya.

Hello,
Access Tables VBAK & VBAP.
From the above tables you will get Solt to Party & Ship to Party Codes.
For Customer names you have to pass the Customer Codes to Table - KNA1
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

DIServer insert operations for sales orders with error

DIServer insert operations for sales orders with
That even though the insert is inserted DocDueDate DocDueDate it says error.
Subtracting the value of the format 'yyyy-mm-dd', 'yyyy/mm/dd', 'mm-dd-yyyy', 'mm/dd/yyyy' put all reporting
When the input is entered DocDueDate ShipDate also put together ... but I get an error.
The error message 'env: Receiver-10Enter due date [ORDR.DocDueDate] 171AddObject2EEE7D98-AB71-464A-93AB-933F0AD3D4DC'
Purchase order entered into the normal value because the xml is missing or wrong with you.
Please answer all the possibilities that can be resolved
This Xml used.
"<BOM>" +
"<BO>" +
"<AdmInfo>" +
"<Object>oOrders</Object>" +
"</AdmInfo>" +
"<QueryParams>" +
"<DocEntry />" +
"</QueryParams>" +
"<Documents>" +
        "<row>" +
        "<DocType>I</DocType>" +
        "<DocDate>2012-01-11</DocDate>" +
        "<DocDueDate>2012-01-11</DocDueDate>" +
        "<CardCode>CD00001</CardCode>" +
        "<Address>Anymode</Address>" +
        "<DocCurrency>KRW</DocCurrency>" +
        "<Comments>[sales orders] LGU TEST</Comments>" +
        "<TaxDate>2012-01-11</TaxDate>" +
        "<JournalMemo>JournalMemo</JournalMemo>" +
        "<Address2>Addr</Address2>" +
        "<BPL_IDAssignedToInvoice>1</BPL_IDAssignedToInvoice>" +
        "</row>" +
"</Documents>" +
"<Document_Lines>" +
        "<row>" +
        "<ItemCode>ACDT0100ET</ItemCode>" +
        "<Quantity>1</Quantity>" +
        "<Price>5000</Price>" +
        "<DiscountPercent>10</DiscountPercent>" +
        "<WarehouseCode>A100</WarehouseCode>" +
        "<VatGroup>A2</VatGroup>" +
        "</row>" +
"</Document_Lines>" +
"</BO>" +
"</BOM>";

I had the same error change the Date to the format yyyymmdd, and problem solved.

Budget check for PM orders with main and sub-projects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for