Budget Issue

Dear All,
I have created a project which spans for two years (from 2010 to 2011) and budgets are been allocated for both the years. 1st Phase (1st WBS Element) of the Project will be completed during 2010. Goods for 2nd phase (2nd WBS Element) were planned for 2011 and it has been triggered for procurement through MRP and PO is been sent to Vendor (commitments appear in 2011). However due to urgency goods has been received in this month ( Dec 2010), and a GRN is raised. Due to this reason the commitment value for 2011 is been shown as Actual in 2010, though we have not allocate a 2010-budget for 2nd WBS Element (shows a negative available balance). Budget Availability for Project is active.
Want to know the valid reason for this and a way to stop the sameu2026..
Thanks,

Budget check will not happen during GR, this is std SAP, that is why the budget check didnt happen when you receive goods for 2011 PO in 2010, because budget check happened when you create the PO.
If you want budgetary control for receipt of goods for 2011 PO in 2010 then apply this note 696362

Similar Messages

  • WBS rearrangement and budget issues

    We have implemented PS in our system
    for the last 6 years. We use mainly
    WBSs and PMorders attached to them. We
    tried to use IM in the past but we
    were not very mature for it. We have
    now many projects in the system with
    multiple roots, due to a system design
    in the past. We want to convert them
    to one root projects and activate the
    necessary customizing in project
    profile. We are planning now to
    activate budgeting and availability
    control, and this has created the need
    for one root per project
    Are there any issues with actual
    costs, commitments and availability
    control? Is it safe to rearrange WBSs
    after actual postings have been made,
    commitments have been created but no
    budget has been set? Are there any side effects in reporting?
    We are also wondering if there are any
    conflicts regarding reactivating IM at
    a later stage, after using PS
    budgeting for a while. I suppose we do
    not have any issues, because many
    companies have started useing PS
    budgeting and then implemented IM. Is
    this correct?
    Thnak you in advance for your cooperation
    Edited by: Vasilios Iliadis on Mar 31, 2008 3:55 PM

    Hello Vasilios Iliadis,
    Dont change the existing projects. you will end up in many many problems. Once budget is assigned to WBS, you cannot change the structure.
    My suggestion is , Going forward from a particular date, all new projects will be created with new structure. New budget from IM, etcc...
    This will make your life easy.
    FATMAN

  • Budget issue while creating PO in SRM

    Hello All,
    We are using SRM_SERVER 5.5 SP level 11. We have extended classic scenario.
    Whenever we create PO assigned to account assignment category ORDER where ORDER is assigned with some fixed budget in R/3, we are able to create PO. But no budget details appears in PO. Budget tab in PO shows "No Budget Information Exists". BUDGET_CHECK_BADI is also deactivated.
    Why this message is displayed instead of Budget details?
    Is there any configuration required to be done for displaying budget details? What might be the issue? Please help.
    Thanks,
    Shital Nimje
    Edited by: Shital Nimje on Sep 22, 2009 4:13 AM

    Hi
    Is it a Direct material ?
    How did you create a Shopping cart?
    Hope you may not have accounting assignment in your Purchase order?
    Scenario plz?
    you might this error message while doing confirmation in SRM.
    "Enter Stor. location"
    Br
    Muthu

  • KO22 internal order budget issue

    Hello All,
    while making changes for internal order budget with transaction code KO22 the system shows a error as u201CItem order xxxxxx budget exceededu201D & for some orders u2018Item order xxxxxx budget almost exhaustedu201D & also referring to a budget for year 2006,2007,2008 . & The system doesn't accept those changes .
    Another strange thing is that  the system allows the same changes for few items  (maybe 4, 5, or six that time it will get saved that time it will not give error) ,
    but trying to do  10-15 changes , the system shows the warning message as stated above
    If anyone has encountered this strange issue please share your inputs
    Thanks & regards,
    Prashant

    Dear,
    When making changes to budget then make sure you are increasing it not decreasing....
    When you decrease the budget then system will check tolerance defined............and display warning or error....
    For e.g in tolerance you have defined that system should display warning at 95% absorption of budget and Error at 100%.
    You have set budget 10000 INR for the Internal Order. So it means at 9500 INR system will issue warning and at 10000 INR or more system will give error.
    If posted amount to order is 9000 INR so you can noway reduce budget less than 9000 INR because it is 100% and system will give error.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • Need Setup steps for the Budget issue

    I have an issue in Project Costing Superuser,
    Once i login and go with the following steps below
    ==>Budget==> Query one project, Authorized budget ==> History==>
    under toobar==>Special==> Monitor Workflow i get the following error occurs
    FRM-40735: Special1 Trigger Raised Unhandled exception Ora-20002
    Now, my question is i want to reproduce this by creating a new transaction and i have to send the notification to the user email id.
    Can anyone help me the steps as how to go with as i dont know abt this..
    Kumar

    start studying event groups and dynamic triggers. These define which assignments needs reprocessing.

  • Carried-foward PO; budget issue

    Hi Experts,
    We have successfully carry forward one PO along with its budget and while checking the same in FMIOI table it is showing that system has successfully carried forward it in 2015 i.e. status 31.
    Now when am trying to delete this PO system is giving budget error.
    Logically system should release the budget but instead system is asking for budget.
    No other activity has been carried out in that budget address and PR & PO valuation is same.
    Please suggest
    Regards
    Sarvottam

    Hi Eli,
    Issue is resolved.
    I carried forward the Related PR with zero value using FMJ0 & now system is allowing me to delete the PO.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Sarvottam

  • When we raise PO with ref ro PR.-Budget issue

    Dear Experts
         When we raise PO with ref ro PR.
    a)     When the PO value is more than the PR, How the budget  check happen(back ground behaviour of the system)
    b)     When PO value is less than the PR, (After generating the Service Entry Sheet-PO short closed) Ex: PR value 100, PO closed for 80(after Service entry sheet for 80). Will the commitment budget restores to the available budget?
    c)     Budget Availability check during Goods Issue is possible or not? Any SAP Note applicable here
    Many Thanks In advance
    Rama

    Hi,
    a) the difference is checked against the original budget address
    b) no, only if you close/reduce the PR
    c) yes, it's possible. You have to switch the FM update for GR (OFUP)
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Internal Order Budget Issue

    Hello,
    I have one of the scenerio related to Internal order
    My Budget is planned in KO22 as follows.
    2012   1000 INR
    2013   1500 INR
    I created PR of Rs 1300 with delivery date as 15.01.2013. Hence after Pr creation the commitment will go and seat in year 2013.
    But if i did GR against same PR/PO in year 2012 then system should give error as per configeration that budget amount for 2012 is exceede.
    But instead of this i am able to do GR and avaiable amount in report shows negative amount.
    I have done all config related to this, and working fine for all other nornal scenerios. So is anyone have faced this problem. so please provide some solution for this.
    Reg,
    Harry

    Hi Harry
    As per standard system design goods receipts and service entries
    are not subject to availability control checks - see note 46209.
    You can overcome this restriction, however, by means of a user exit
    as described in note 696362.
    br, Guido

  • ECM- Budgeting issue

    Hi,
    We started using ECM functionality last year. During this time, for Budgeting, I configured basic PCP, created budget structure based on Org Structure and loaded budget from PCP>
    Disadvantage of this method is that if a manager has direct reports in different org units then that manager see multiple Budgets. Company this year wants to have a single budget line for each manager which will be 2% of salaries of all direct reports and while assigning merit to employees Budget should come from that pool (even if employees are in different Org unit).
    Please advice how to acheive this. Thanks!

    Hi,
    Your solution lies in SAP Enhancement Package 5 in which two types of budgeting are available: top-down and bottom-up. Bottom-up is what you should be looking at.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/en/c4/8ca3c987a14dbf82f1bf0791f864ed/frameset.htm
    The required business function is HCM_ECM_CI_2. Look for u201Cbudgetu201D in the following link:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/en/6b/b7d9dd755542e4acb7452cf188215e/frameset.htm
    There is nothing available until EhP5.
    Source: help.sap.com
    Hope this helps.
    Donnie

  • Budget accounting cycle issue

    Hi friends,
    I have a PO which was created and approved when Encumbrance was turned off (purchasing > setup > Organization > Financial options > Encumbrance tab) in the system (oracle 11i). but presently Encumbrance is enabled in the system and all the check box are checked in Encumbrance Tab. Now if i do invoice and make payment against that PO will it cause any Budgeting problem. I have tried this in our TEST instance and was successful. but i suspect it may cause problem later with any of the budgeting issue or may be in reporting. pls instruct me should i do it?
    Thanks,
    LISAN

    and please share any budgeting documents, budget accounting cycle document.
    Thanks you all.

  • Budget IO issue

    Hi Gurus,
    I need assistant/advice on IO budget issue.
    Situation :
    User has use wrong IO for purchasing(2008). Instate of OPEX IO, they use CAPEX IO.
    Issue:
    We can't upload 2009 budget as system prompt that we have exceeded budget for 2008.
    Solution/advice:
    1) Do SAP have any indicator to prevent system from checking previous budget utillisation so that we can upload new budget (like cut of date)
    2) Please advice on any solution so that we can upload new budget(capex)
    Thanks in advance
    Suresh Naidu

    i got answer

  • Budget error MR8M

    Hi all ,
    While Cancelling Invoice document through MR8M , system giving error message like below
    Item 010 Order 205459 budget exceeded
    Message no. BP604
    Diagnosis
    In document item 010 Order 205459, budget  for fiscal year 2010 was exceeded by 64,196.00 INR.
    My query is : Why system triggering budget related message since i am cancelling Invoice ( i am not taking additional budget rather i am reducing )

    hELLO ,
    Please kindly review following comment that we usually referred
    to our customer pertaining the budget issue in MR8M:
    When you try to reverse IR via transaction MR8M, the system
    decreases the actual values of the account assigned object (order,
    WBS element) in year 2011 but also tries to re-create the commitment
    values of this object according to the corresponding PO.
    If this PO, however, was created in - let's say - 2010, the system
    tries to increase the commitment for year 2010 again, resulting in the
    error you experienced since the 2010 budget could be
    already (over-)spent.
    If this is your situation, the solution to overcome the problem is
    to run commitment carry forward for your object to unassign the
    commitment from 2010 and to assign it to 2011 instead. If the
    framework is like above described, after this, the reversal of IR
    document via txn MR8M should be possible.
    Hope this helps,
    regards
    Ray

  • Budget (Internal Order)

    Hi Gurus,
    I need assistant/advice on IO budget issue.
    Situation :
    User has use wrong IO for purchasing(2008). Instate of OPEX IO, they use CAPEX IO.
    Issue:
    We can't upload 2009 budget as system prompt that we have exceeded budget for 2008.
    Solution/advice:
    1) Do SAP have any indicator to prevent system from checking previous budget utillisation so that we can upload new budget (like cut of date)
    2) Please advice on any solution so that we can upload new budget(capex)
    Thanks in advance
    Suresh Naidu

    Hi Srikanth,
    Thanks for your quick reply. I would appreciate if you can explain me detailed with T.codes.
    Regards,
    Suresh Naidu

  • Budget mic setup for flamenco guitar

    What's the best way I could spend $200 to get set up to record solo guitar? For un-amplified guitar, would I be better off with a condenser or dynamic mic? I have a line-in on my imac, so I'm wondering if I could forego a USB interface, and plug a mixer/pre amp into the line-in without sacrificing quality. Are two mics better than one, or is it better to sink the entire mic budget into one of better quality? Taking into account the posts I've read and advice from friends, I'm considering the Berhinger UB802 mixer, and an MXL990, or Shure sm-57, or a Sennheiser mic. I welcome your advice and opinions!

    I had been thinking of a set of condensers, but there is the budget issue. The whole idea is to record a really simple demo that I can use to get some local, low-key gigs to bring in a few dollars, so I don't want to spend much money to start with. There is the MXL 990/991 set for $99, but I know what you think of the 990 already. I can see what you're saying about sinking a lot of money even into low-priced mics and preamps.
    I'm going to try what you first suggested, and just start with 1 mic and 1 preamp. Hopefully that will be higher quality than 2 cheaper mics and a low-priced mixer. I sprung for a used Presonus Tubepre on ebay for $59 including shipping. Maybe after I get something going I could go for a pair of condensers and try out the criss-cross pattern. That sounds like a great way to do it.

  • Bidget Tolerence Limits Issue

    Hi Guys,
    I have a budget Issue. The Torrence limits are as follows:
    75% - Warning.
    90% - Warning and mail to Project Manager
    100% - Error.
    But the system is giving error for 90% only and document is not being saved.
    Please help me.
    Ragrds
    Sagar

    Hi Sagar,
    I think you have not entered the project manager number in the WBS element . Please do the same and check again.
    Warm regards,
    Srinivas Potluri

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error while accessing Scheduler Tab on xmlpserver

    Hi all While trying to schedule a publisher report,we are getting the following error java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle.xml.parser.v2.NSResolver at java.lang.J9VMInternals.verifyImpl(Native Method) at java.lang.J9VMInternals.verify(J9VMInternals

  • How to make Sales Office field mandatory in VA01 initial screen?

    Hi, How to make Sales Office field mandatory in VA01 initial screen? I mean in the first screen where we enter the document type and the sales area? Regards, Ajit

  • Releasing Objects from memory-Performance improvement

    First Javafx was excellent in coding on UI rapidly. We did a image application and it was fine with some small memory tweaking pending. Since we have binded variables from static file to all objects, i think the memory of objects removed or deleted i

  • Problem is personalise in portal

    Hi, When I click on personalise option in portal there is no window which is opening. Are there any settings to open the personalise window? Please suggest. Regards, Rajani

  • Error 550 5.7.1 Rcpt command failed: Mail denied due to site`s policy

    Hi, I have a problem with my ocs, i cannot send mail to outside domains from outside my network. What i want to do is to be able to allow a few users to send emails from anywhere (any ip) as long as they use auth because they are mobile users (black