Carried-foward PO; budget issue

Hi Experts,
We have successfully carry forward one PO along with its budget and while checking the same in FMIOI table it is showing that system has successfully carried forward it in 2015 i.e. status 31.
Now when am trying to delete this PO system is giving budget error.
Logically system should release the budget but instead system is asking for budget.
No other activity has been carried out in that budget address and PR & PO valuation is same.
Please suggest
Regards
Sarvottam

Hi Eli,
Issue is resolved.
I carried forward the Related PR with zero value using FMJ0 & now system is allowing me to delete the PO.
Thanks
Regards
Sarvottam

Similar Messages

FMJ2 - Carry forward with budget Line

Hello,
I have done a carry forward FMJ2 and everything works perfectly. However the client let me know that they also want the budget line associated to the commitments to be carry forwarded.
When I try that, the system gives me error FMAVC005.
In "Define basic stting for carry forward" I have "Carry forward with document chain".
In "Enter default settings" I have flaged "Carry forward budget for commitement allowed" and also the other 2 (Commitemnt and residual).
Any idea about this topic.
Please let me know.
Regards,

Hello,
Avalability control is activated and I ma working with BCS Budget.
In 2013 I have introduce my budget FMBB (Budget line). Then I have created a reserve agaisnt this budget line.
When I try to do the carry forward the budget line is not carry forward and so the reserve in 2014 is trying to consume a budget line that do not exist.
Please find a document with the images of the customizng and the 4th one with the result of the budget in 2014 but without the availability control (I get a negative ammount).
Regards,
Daniel

Consolidation Balance Carry foward

Dear All,
After performing a balance carry foward in ECCS from 2007 to 2008. The Accumulated Surplus / Deficit FS item is comming up with a difference as a result of currency translation. Even though, the translation method is configured as historical. Please can any one let me know if I missed somthing.
Regards!

Hi,
Run...
trx. F.16 for GL accounts
(trx. FAGLGVTR if you're using NewGL)
trx. F.07 for AP/AR
Kyoko

Carry Forward of Budget in Investment Program

Dear Experts
I am trying to carry forward the budget of the Investment program from FY 2010 to FY 2011. I have used IM27 for copying the program structure and Internal Orders. The Budget Values, Commitments of IO has been carried forward but I am not able to carry forward the budget at the Position ID and NODE Level.
Kindly help.
Vikash

Hello,
You can run the BPCARRY01 program to copy the most recent budget structure to a target year. In doing so, you no longer have to maintain BS elements that already exist.
You execute the program, under Accounting - Public Sector Management - Funds Management - Master Data - Budget Structure - Former Budgeting -Transfer from Previous Year. This is, as Eli said, FM9Z.
Helene

SEM BCS - Balance Carry Foward

Hi,
What is the prerequisites to execute task balance carry foward?
I have already create task for carry foward and assign it to task hierarky, but the task doesn't appear in the consolidation monitor.
Thanks in advance

I have solve this problem using SAP Notes : 699111
Thanks.

Down payment Carried Forward: Negative budget

Hello,
I have a downpayment of 8 euros in year X related to a PO. I carry forwarded the PO to year X+1.
In year X+1 I have received an invoice of 7 and so the system automatically:
Invoice 7
Invoice -8
Downpayment -8
Payment 8
That means that the budget is negative in year X+1. Any solution for that? If I check "Activate the conversion of bank clearing" in the settings of the Payment Transfer it would be the same?
Please let us know.
Regards

Hi Mar,
I had seen this SAP note before posting thread.
I have some doubts in regard to implementing above note which are as follows:
1. In update profile Down payment request & Down payment is marked for statistical update then why it is impacting funds
2. SAP Note says that it is a modification & SAP will withdraw support after implementation of note. What are the changes take place once note is implemented:
      a. Whether I would not be able to make down payment against purchase order line item?
      b. If i can not make payment then this note is of no use as i want to track down payment against purchase order.
      c. If i can make the down payment against purchase order, will it not impact purchase order history?
                                                                                OR
      d. this change will only impact fund management & down payment document will not impact fund management
Thanks

WBS rearrangement and budget issues

We have implemented PS in our system
for the last 6 years. We use mainly
WBSs and PMorders attached to them. We
tried to use IM in the past but we
were not very mature for it. We have
now many projects in the system with
multiple roots, due to a system design
in the past. We want to convert them
to one root projects and activate the
necessary customizing in project
profile. We are planning now to
activate budgeting and availability
control, and this has created the need
for one root per project
Are there any issues with actual
costs, commitments and availability
control? Is it safe to rearrange WBSs
after actual postings have been made,
commitments have been created but no
budget has been set? Are there any side effects in reporting?
We are also wondering if there are any
conflicts regarding reactivating IM at
a later stage, after using PS
budgeting for a while. I suppose we do
not have any issues, because many
companies have started useing PS
budgeting and then implemented IM. Is
this correct?
Thnak you in advance for your cooperation
Edited by: Vasilios Iliadis on Mar 31, 2008 3:55 PM

Hello Vasilios Iliadis,
Dont change the existing projects. you will end up in many many problems. Once budget is assigned to WBS, you cannot change the structure.
My suggestion is , Going forward from a particular date, all new projects will be created with new structure. New budget from IM, etcc...
This will make your life easy.
FATMAN

Budget issue while creating PO in SRM

Hello All,
We are using SRM_SERVER 5.5 SP level 11. We have extended classic scenario.
Whenever we create PO assigned to account assignment category ORDER where ORDER is assigned with some fixed budget in R/3, we are able to create PO. But no budget details appears in PO. Budget tab in PO shows "No Budget Information Exists". BUDGET_CHECK_BADI is also deactivated.
Why this message is displayed instead of Budget details?
Is there any configuration required to be done for displaying budget details? What might be the issue? Please help.
Thanks,
Shital Nimje
Edited by: Shital Nimje on Sep 22, 2009 4:13 AM

Hi
Is it a Direct material ?
How did you create a Shopping cart?
Hope you may not have accounting assignment in your Purchase order?
Scenario plz?
you might this error message while doing confirmation in SRM.
"Enter Stor. location"
Br
Muthu

KO22 internal order budget issue

Hello All,
while making changes for internal order budget with transaction code KO22 the system shows a error as u201CItem order xxxxxx budget exceededu201D & for some orders u2018Item order xxxxxx budget almost exhaustedu201D & also referring to a budget for year 2006,2007,2008 . & The system doesn't accept those changes .
Another strange thing is that the system allows the same changes for few items (maybe 4, 5, or six that time it will get saved that time it will not give error) ,
but trying to do 10-15 changes , the system shows the warning message as stated above
If anyone has encountered this strange issue please share your inputs
Thanks & regards,
Prashant

Dear,
When making changes to budget then make sure you are increasing it not decreasing....
When you decrease the budget then system will check tolerance defined............and display warning or error....
For e.g in tolerance you have defined that system should display warning at 95% absorption of budget and Error at 100%.
You have set budget 10000 INR for the Internal Order. So it means at 9500 INR system will issue warning and at 10000 INR or more system will give error.
If posted amount to order is 9000 INR so you can noway reduce budget less than 9000 INR because it is 100% and system will give error.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Need Setup steps for the Budget issue

I have an issue in Project Costing Superuser,
Once i login and go with the following steps below
==>Budget==> Query one project, Authorized budget ==> History==>
under toobar==>Special==> Monitor Workflow i get the following error occurs
FRM-40735: Special1 Trigger Raised Unhandled exception Ora-20002
Now, my question is i want to reproduce this by creating a new transaction and i have to send the notification to the user email id.
Can anyone help me the steps as how to go with as i dont know abt this..
Kumar

start studying event groups and dynamic triggers. These define which assignments needs reprocessing.

When we raise PO with ref ro PR.-Budget issue

Dear Experts
     When we raise PO with ref ro PR.
a)     When the PO value is more than the PR, How the budget check happen(back ground behaviour of the system)
b)     When PO value is less than the PR, (After generating the Service Entry Sheet-PO short closed) Ex: PR value 100, PO closed for 80(after Service entry sheet for 80). Will the commitment budget restores to the available budget?
c)     Budget Availability check during Goods Issue is possible or not? Any SAP Note applicable here
Many Thanks In advance
Rama

Hi,
a) the difference is checked against the original budget address
b) no, only if you close/reduce the PR
c) yes, it's possible. You have to switch the FM update for GR (OFUP)
Regards,
Eli

Internal Order Budget Issue

Hello,
I have one of the scenerio related to Internal order
My Budget is planned in KO22 as follows.
2012 1000 INR
2013 1500 INR
I created PR of Rs 1300 with delivery date as 15.01.2013. Hence after Pr creation the commitment will go and seat in year 2013.
But if i did GR against same PR/PO in year 2012 then system should give error as per configeration that budget amount for 2012 is exceede.
But instead of this i am able to do GR and avaiable amount in report shows negative amount.
I have done all config related to this, and working fine for all other nornal scenerios. So is anyone have faced this problem. so please provide some solution for this.
Reg,
Harry

Hi Harry
As per standard system design goods receipts and service entries
are not subject to availability control checks - see note 46209.
You can overcome this restriction, however, by means of a user exit
as described in note 696362.
br, Guido

Balance carry foward

hello ,
pls let me knwo the procedure of balance carry forward , i have set up the retain earnings acc, what the accoutnts invloved in carrying forward the balance.
thanks very much.

Hi,
Run...
trx. F.16 for GL accounts
(trx. FAGLGVTR if you're using NewGL)
trx. F.07 for AP/AR
Kyoko

BPC Carry foward of auto adjustments (Consol)

Hi,
We are using BPC periodic model for Consolidation. Our carry forward tasks, basically carries forward the closing balance for balance shet items from the prior period to the current period. It does not carry forward any values that have datasource type "A", which is fine. I have read the consolidation configuration notes, and its states that the datasource type "A" will be carried forward when running the consolidation (auto adjustment task), it will adjust carry forward balances for prior period auto adjustments (datasource type "A")
This does not seem to be automatically happened, has anyone got any ideas? Thanks

Dear All:
I have a similar question about this automatical funcion in copying A-Type dadasource. I did see such copying of datasource with A-type in BPC 5.0 MS version, however, I had no idea why BPC does this copy automatically? Can I disable this and just copy datasource with type I and M into next year instead? Or how to explain this in terms of accounting consolidasion? Can anyone share your experience in it?Thanks in advance.
Fred Cheng

Budget Issue

Dear All,
I have created a project which spans for two years (from 2010 to 2011) and budgets are been allocated for both the years. 1st Phase (1st WBS Element) of the Project will be completed during 2010. Goods for 2nd phase (2nd WBS Element) were planned for 2011 and it has been triggered for procurement through MRP and PO is been sent to Vendor (commitments appear in 2011). However due to urgency goods has been received in this month ( Dec 2010), and a GRN is raised. Due to this reason the commitment value for 2011 is been shown as Actual in 2010, though we have not allocate a 2010-budget for 2nd WBS Element (shows a negative available balance). Budget Availability for Project is active.
Want to know the valid reason for this and a way to stop the sameu2026..
Thanks,

Budget check will not happen during GR, this is std SAP, that is why the budget check didnt happen when you receive goods for 2011 PO in 2010, because budget check happened when you create the PO.
If you want budgetary control for receipt of goods for 2011 PO in 2010 then apply this note 696362

Carried-foward PO; budget issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for