Build transports

Hi Experts,
I have one Multi provider and under this i have 2 cubes, now as per my requirment i need to build this in another server
so how can i Build transports of all the objects, and how to import to another server.
and below things are i need to do
-Setup the process chains
-Conduct data validation between two servers
-Move queries and workbooks
-User testing and migration
Please help me on this
Many thanks in advance
David.Rathod

Hi David,
Once the objects are developed in D system, you will have to collect them in the TR's & move these TR's so that all the changes will be reflected(Development/chnages done in Dev) in the Quality(or testing) system.
Setup the process chains
For creating Process chain, please go through the below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/EN/67/13843b74f7be0fe10000000a114084/content.htm
Conduct data validation between two servers
For testing, you will have to compare the source system data with BW data. not between the two BW servers
Move queries and workbooks
Collect the queries in the TR through Transport connection from RSA1 trans & release it to Quality system through SE09 trans.
Hope it is clear & helpful!
Regards,
Pavan

Similar Messages

AdapterModule Development using NWDI

Hi all,
could you please be so kind and tell me, how i can devlop an adaptermodule for PI 7.1 using NWDI (for central build + transport)
I know how to develop an adapter module using netweaver developer studio, but the problem with this approach is, that you need to manually delete some interfaces from the adapter module jar file. i don't know how to "tell" nwdi to do this
Which SoftwareComponent dependencies do i need ?
Best regards

Hi Haider,
Refer the link below
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/02706f11-0d01-0010-e5ae-ac25e74c4c81?overridelayout=true]
regards,
Chandra Shekhar.

Multiple schema, but instance doc does not have namespace

Is it possible to successfully validate an instance document without namespaces against multiple schema with different namespaces?
example:
this is the normal xml which is valid with all the namespace:
<MyRoot dateTime="040112061834" instanceIdentifier="NTNDEC13541" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://org.schema.ntn" xsi:schemaLocation="http://org.schema.ntn ntn.xsd" xmlns:cbc="http://org.schema.cbc cbc.xsd">
 <cbc:MessageVersion>040</cbc:MessageVersion>
 <cbc:SenderID>2344134</cbc:SenderID>
 <cbc:RecipientID>3485774</cbc:RecipientID>
 <cbc:TotalNumberOfDeclaration>1</cbc:TotalNumberOfDeclaration>
</MyRoot>but I want to remove all namespace
<MyRoot>
 <MessageVersion>040</MessageVersion>
 <SenderID>2344134</SenderID>
 <RecipientID>3485774</RecipientID>
 <TotalNumberOfDeclaration>1</TotalNumberOfDeclaration>
</MyRoot>now is it possible to validate programmatically using sax the above xml against multiple schema? can i do it without any namespace at all??
thanks

Hi Larry, Thanks for your reply along with Muppet Mark, If I changed the color settings originally it was not my intension, I was simply just opening the next project to work on and viola’ “missing profiles”.
Attachment (picture) 7 was my last setting for color prior to your email, and yes I was messing around with this last night comparing it to one of our old G4’s, so I can’t remember where it started out before I got my hands on it.
Attachment (picture) 8 is my current settings based on your email recommendations.
Attachment (picture) 6 is the message I receive when I open any files created prior to these changes I just made. However after I open and resave the file I no longer receive this (picture 6) message.
My question is will my color be back to where it was before the problem started last week. In looking over one of the files I opened (I design/build transportation maps btw) most of the color is where I usually have it set however some colors were fractional as if they were converted from spot colors. SO I’m not sure what to do except go through all the known colors and make sure they are where I usually would set them, or do you have a better suggestion.
Oh by the way – for all you guys that are helping lunch is on me at McDonalds on Michigan St in Grand Rapids, MI!!
#7
#8
#6

ESS standard Application modification

Hello,
We are on ERP 6.0 EHP4.
We have got ESS and MSS implemented. Applications are working fine now.
However user has not yet reverted with any modification on standard one...but still I need to find out on how I can make changes to existing standard applications.
Below are places where it could be done...according to me :
1. Make service specific settings.
Here it is possible to hide fields and show new fields based on existing infotypes. These settings are done in R/3 SPRO Tcode.....
2. Iview Personalization.
Here you can make necessary changes in UI presentation/layout. Making fields disabled or readonly. These are done in portal PCD....
3. FPM modification.
you have to use Self services administrator role here. This is a separate business package which you need to get from SAP.
Please comment on whether my findings are correct ?
Secondly do I need NWDS to modify on any part of existing applications. Can anybody give 1 example where I need to modify WD Java code/view.
Is Self Services Administrator role free from SAP if you have already purchased ESS/MSS Self-Services Package.
I read an article which is below :
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/ESSPersonalInformationUIenhancementwithoutmodification
However I do not feel it is now applicable for our Business package version.
Can anybody throw a light on ...if I am missing out on something......

Hi Saurabh
1.     Once you install ESS and MSS business package you will get the Self Service Administrator role. We donu2019t need to buy the additional licenses separately for it.
                     About the modification of FPM application, we can modify the FPM applications/views but it is recommended not to modify the SAP delivered FPM configuration. We need to create a new FPM application.
2.     We need NWDS, to enhance the SAP delivered functionality or to fix any of the defects etc. for example I have seen some of the clients asking for the check image on the edit screen of bank application to show what is routing number and account number for the end users, some of the clients they need confirmation, accept terms and conditions etc while creating/updating a bank information etc.
For building the custom applications.
3.     NWDI and NWDS are different, they go together. If itu2019s a big project then we would need a dedicated system for NWDI. I believe it would need the license. If you are using NWDS and also ESS & MSS business package then you have to go for NWDI for creating custom apps or for modifying the standard apps.
NWDI: is used for source code repository, version control, build, transports etc for the java code. In simple terms, NWDS is the front end to the NWDI.
4.     The url u posted is not obsolete, its very important and still holds good. If we want to enhance the back end i.e. infotype and show the enhanced fields of the infotype on portal then we have to go in that route.
5. I think you have covered all the ways for modification and customization.
Regards
Yugandhar Reddy

Contract Approval WS14000086

Hello,
We have a SRM 4.0 Implementation (Extended Classic) and SP SAPKIBKS09.
This is our problem:
We have "no approval workflow" for creating contracts (GOAs), the WS14000086 workflow.
When the user creates the contract, it seems to be approved, but the status remain as "Waiting for approval".
In the RZ20 transaction we have the next error:
An error has occured MF BBP_PDH_WFL_WI_EXECUTE in position SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE. Sy-subrc
An error has occured MF BBP_PDH_WFL_WI_EXECUTE in position SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE. Sy-subrc:
In SWDD, we check the workflows and subworkflows and there is no error (I think we fixed the error 401 "no version for workflow exist" by using FM SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999).
In SWI1 there is no error and all is ok.
In SWUD we run the consistency check and is ok.
Any idea?
Thanks and Regards.

Hi
Please go through this SAP OSS Notes, which will help ->
Note 962488 "Workflow definition '&' not in version '&' (WD 401)
Note 981295 No workflow definition in Version 'xxxx'
Note 982352 Updating workflows in the test system
Note 686297 WF Builder: Increased error tolerance in transport system
Note 378487 WF Builder: transported version not set to active
Note 449993 Transporting document templates does not work
Note 501176 Workflow Builder: Transporting to client copy fails
Note 315515 WF Editor/Builder:Versns overwr. w/ incorrct versns
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Rapid Deployment Solution for SAP CRM - Landscape

Hi
For the first time we have applied the Rapid Deployment Solution for SAP CRM ITSDO into our new DEV system. The activation of this RDS creates 2 transports (one WORKBENCH, one CUSTOMIZING)
I now need to apply the RDS to our QA and PRD systems - is it enough to just transport the 2 transports or do I need to do the entire activation again in both QA and PRD systems?
I would really appreciate any assistance here.
Thanks

Hi Leigh,
Just wondering how you got on with those transports.. Was it sufficient for you to release the Solution Builder transports to target system or did you need to carry out manual activities in the target system?
Also, What did you do with regard to activating the reporting client in the target system? did the transport take care of everyting?
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

"Missing Profile - The doc does not have an embedded CMYK profile"

For the first time ever last Wednesday each time I open a file in AI - CS3 I get the same message: "Missing Profile - The doc does not have an embedded CMYK profile". I looked in library>colorsync>profiles and sure enough they were gone? I downloaded new profiles from Adobe, installed them in library>colorsync>profiles - and still the same thing with each file I open. I dragged AI to the trash, re-installed AI from my disc repeated the process with the same results - HELP!
I don't seem to be able to find any info on the Adobe forum, I realize I need to upgrade but for now what is the solution - Thanks in advance. Boatingislife!

Hi Larry, Thanks for your reply along with Muppet Mark, If I changed the color settings originally it was not my intension, I was simply just opening the next project to work on and viola’ “missing profiles”.
Attachment (picture) 7 was my last setting for color prior to your email, and yes I was messing around with this last night comparing it to one of our old G4’s, so I can’t remember where it started out before I got my hands on it.
Attachment (picture) 8 is my current settings based on your email recommendations.
Attachment (picture) 6 is the message I receive when I open any files created prior to these changes I just made. However after I open and resave the file I no longer receive this (picture 6) message.
My question is will my color be back to where it was before the problem started last week. In looking over one of the files I opened (I design/build transportation maps btw) most of the color is where I usually have it set however some colors were fractional as if they were converted from spot colors. SO I’m not sure what to do except go through all the known colors and make sure they are where I usually would set them, or do you have a better suggestion.
Oh by the way – for all you guys that are helping lunch is on me at McDonalds on Michigan St in Grand Rapids, MI!!
#7
#8
#6

Unable to transport Integratin Builder objects from Dev to QA correctly

Hi,
System : Pi 711 SPS03
SLD 7.1 with latest model and content
We are trying to transport Integration Builder Objects from Dev to QAS, but the SID translation from DEV to QAS is not working.
The interface is being imported as the source SID.
We checked the SLD configuration for Transport targets, that is when we realised the below issue.
Unable to Assign Business Systems in respective Business System Groups
The expected configuration of the SLD is as below:
UKD_400 - Integration Server for Dev PI 711 server
INTEGRATION_SERVER_UKQ - Integration Server for QAS PI 711 server
XI_QA - Business System Group for all Quality Systems in the landscape
          1) UKD_400
          2) UC1_ECC_60
          3) UED_400
XI_DEV - Business System Group for all Developement Systems in the landscape
          1) INTEGRATION_SERVER_UKQ
          2) UC2_400
          3) UEQ_400
We are unable to put the business systems in their respective groups
All the Business systems are either being assigned in XI_QA or XI_DEV
Please let us know if this is a product error in SLD 7.1, could not find any relevant notes
Thanks,
Govind
Edited by: Govind Prathi on Feb 12, 2010 10:25 PM
Edited by: Govind Prathi on Feb 12, 2010 10:27 PM

We have already assinged the Integration server to their respective business system groups while creating the Business system groups.
   BSG: XI_DEV --> UKD_400( Integration Server DEV )
BSG : XI_QA ---> INTEGRATION_SERVER_UKQ( Integration Server QA)
As per documentation, the business systems should be automatically assigned to their respective Groups based on their association with Integration Server.
But, we are not seeing this behaviour, both the Integration servers are being assigned to the same Business System Group.
Please help me understand if i am something in the configurations.
Thanks
Govind

How transport profile set in segment builder to other CRM system?

Hello!
I create a lot of profile set in segment builder. I using CRM4 and CRM7 wich connected RFC and middleware.
How transport profile group from CRM4 to CRM7?
Edited by: Vladimir Shilov on Dec 19, 2010 11:08 AM

Dear Thomas,
Did this get solved?
Thank you,
-Vijay

Regarding transport issue of integration builder component

Hi All,
I am trying to transport integration builder part to quality. My scenario is SAP to JDBC using RFC and JDBC adaptor. Scenario is working fine in development. I am able to transport enterprise service builder part but while transporting integration builder part i am getting below mentioned error.
Enter a value for attribute JDBC Driver
Enter a value for attribute Connection
JDBC driver is configured on PI quality server.
Please help me with the issue.
Thanks

Hi Aamir,
The channel parameters differ from each stack, (Dev, QA and Prod).
Once the transport is moved from one stack to another, Below are the step you need to do manually,
- Transfer the object to your name,
- Open Communication channels (JDBC, File etc) Enter the values for the Driver and Connection (in your case) and file path and pattern in case of file channels and save and then try to activate the transport list.
Hope this helps.
Sndhl

Integration builder config obj transported from DEV to QA but not found

Hi,
I have a new development in PI DEV. I exported the ESR objects in a transport as well the Integration builder config objects in the same transport. Asked my admin to move it through CTS to PI QA. Its done.
In PI QA system, I am able to see the new ESR objects in the Enterprise services Builder.
But not able to see the config objects in Integration Directory (Integration Builder).
I researched the forum got some tips tried but in vain.
1. I chose Tools menu --> Find transports option but no transports found.
2. I cleared cache (full refresh)
3. Closed and reopened Integration builder
I just want to see those config folders as it was designed in the dev !!
Help is appreciated please.
thnks

Hi!
Yes , you can transport the ID Objects through CTS, But the catch is : -
After transport ID Objects, will not directly come into ID object list Like ESR Object Did , here in ID transported Object first Move into Change Object list , There you need to acticate Them. then these Object will be appear in ID Object List,
Method CONFIGURATION OBJECTS ---> (INTEGRATION DIRECTORY) -
> INTEGRATION BUILDER.
Step -I
1. Select Configuration Scenario to trasport.
2. Right Click on Configuration Scenario to Transport.
3. Select Export Option.
4. Check or Select the Configuration Scenario.
5. Check the Mode of transport.
CTS MOde:-
5.1     Select a required type of Object Set:
     IN OUR CASE: ALL OBJECT OF Selected Scenario.
5.2        Select Transort request.
5.3      Finish the Process.
TRANSPORT USING FILE SYSTEM:-
5.1     Select a required type of Object Set:
     IN OUR CASE: ALL OBJECT OF Selected Scenario.
5.2      Finish the Process.
Step II
1. GO TO TOOLS OPTION IN MENU BAR
2. OPEN CTS TRANSPORT ORGANIZER
3. Select the request to Release.
4. Press Button Release.
Step III( Steps to be Perform at Target System).
1. Execute Transection Code STMS.
2. Check your Transport Request Number.
3. Focus on that Trasport Request Number Through Mouse.
4. Now Import The Transport Request on Specific client of Target System.
5.Click Ok.
FINAL :- NOw on Quality Server all Transported Objects Need to be activated( CHANGE OBJECTS).
Regards
Prabhat Sharma.

Access Service Builder Project after transport

Hello Experts,
I had created a builder project in SEGW & had also created two web services under this project. Our system refreshes every week & then transports are re-imported on need basis. My GW developments are re-imported. Though all objects are there & service is also working fine, I am not able to find my builder project in SEGW after re-import. I have checked TADIR & entry does exist here. After debugging search help at SEGW, i found out that it seraches a global buffer table if current user has accessed that project earlier.
What would be the way to get my project in SEGW after transport or re-import?
Regards
Gaurav K

Thanks Krishna for your reply.
It was actually an authorization error. That's why i was not able to see my project in SEGW. Thanks
Regards
Gaurav Karkara

PI 7.11: Import of CTS+ transport fails (Integration builder only)

Hi,
I've released a transport from DEV to QUAL system.
I've imported via STMS.
But I don't see the transported objects.
The imported change list is already closed and I cannot activate the contained objects.
There's no open change list available for my user.
When I try to transport those objects again, I get an error in STMS:
com.sap.aii.ibtransportclient.XiTransportException: caused by: ClientServerException exception:Unable to transfer object Configuration Scenario SetEmployeeSOAP (DirContext) to change list 'XI 7.1 Import' (c6a9ea7b-57db-11e1-a930-000025876142) since object is already in your change list 'XI 7.1 Import' (e1586c72-57c2-11e1-bf9c-000025876142).
How can I activate the objects contained in the mentioned change lists?
Thanks in advance!

Unfortunately, I've crowned too early
The target systems are not filled in correctly.
We have a 3-tier environment (DEV, QUAL, PROD).
I've setup the same SLD settings in SLD in DEV and QUAL system.
SAP_DEV has target SAP_QUAL and SAP_QUAL has target SAP_PROD.
But in the scenario that I've imported into PI QUAL it didn't replace SAP_DEV with SAP_QUAL (e. g. in CC, Receiver determination etc.).
What can be the reason for that?
Are my target settings not correct?

SNP Transport Load Builder

Hi Experts,
Need your urgent help on below Issue:
In the planning book we have PR's (Distribution Receipt Planned) for 7/12(Sat), 7/13(Sun), 7/14(Mon) as you can see below.
When we run TLB Program /SAPAPO/RMSNPTLB in Simulation mode, Shipment #3 lumped the PRs that have the same Demand Date but has different Availability date.
Now I have modified the Standard FM ‘/SAPAPO/MSNP_TLB_CALL’ in order to create 2 shipments where Demand Date + Availability Date are both considered. It is working fine in Simulation Mode.
But when User is Running same Report without Simulation Mode, 2 Orders are created with Demand Date 12.07.2014 but Delivery Date and Availability date for both Orders is 14.07.2014.
As per User Expectation for one order Delivery Date and Availability date should be 13.07.2014 and for Other 14.07.2014.
As 13.07.2014 is Sunday, it is considering Monday (14.07.2014) for Both the Orders.
Could you please help me how can I get delivery + availability date as 13.07.2014 for one Order?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
Best Regards,
Anshul Agarwal.

Hi Rajesh,
As in SAP help, it did not mention specifically on prioritisation of TSP via deployment optimiser, I would suggest you can try maintaining TSP relevant in "Means of transport" in Transportation lane and then creating TSP for means of Transport in the third tab which contains priority field. Once you maintain, try whether it is doing prioritisation.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Web Interface builder - Not displaying planning folder after transporting

I created an web-enabled planning folder and transported it to the quality system.
In the development system works perfectly (variables, layouts, links, user-exits, etc).
After transporting it to the quality system when I run this web planning folder the page doesn't load and displays with an empty white web page.
I tried to re-generate it in the quality system, but I'm having the same problem. I haven't recieved any error message.
Development system:
SAP_BW     350     0019     SAPKW35019     Business Information Warehouse
SEM-BW     400     0012     SAPKGS4012     SEM-BW 400 : Add-On Upgrade Request
BI_CONT     353     0007     SAPKIBIFP7     Business Intelligence Content
Quality system:
SAP_BW     350     0019     SAPKW35019     Business Information Warehouse
BI_CONT     353     0007     SAPKIBIFP7     Business Intelligence Content
SEM-BW     400     0012     SAPKGS4012     SEM-BW 400 : Add-On Upgrade Request

Thanks for your post.
I tried re-transporting and re-generate it again and I'm still having the same problem.
Have you heard of a note or something for a similar problem?
The only thing I recall is that this client was using SEM 3.5 before and upgraded to SEM 4.0 recently.

Build transports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for