Bumblebee performance is too slow

Hi everyone,
This is my second post in this forum and it has been only 2 days that I met Arch. Before, I was using Ubuntu for 3 years, but due to low performance in my PC, unfortunately, I decided to say good bye which was hard to say.
Now, I am trying to have the same setup as my previous laptop and Bumblebee was one of them. I followed the instructions here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bumblebee.
It seems that bumblebee is installed and working, however, the FPS is too slow:
$ optirun glxspheres64 -info
Polygons in scene: 62464
Visual ID of window: 0x20
Context is Direct
OpenGL Renderer: GeForce GT 520MX/PCIe/SSE2
0.023848 frames/sec - 0.021114 Mpixels/sec
Without optirun I get:
$ glxspheres64 -info
Polygons in scene: 62464
Visual ID of window: 0x20
Context is Direct
OpenGL Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Sandybridge Mobile
0.033237 frames/sec - 0.029426 Mpixels/sec
0.029968 frames/sec - 0.026533 Mpixels/sec
This is impossible as I was getting very good results before.
I am wondering if I did something wrong, or missed anything.
Just for information, system specs:
Intel i7 2670QM 2.2 GHZ
4 GB RAM
1 GB GeForce GT 520MX
512 MB Intel Graphics
I played 0ad with and without optirun and the performance was good in both of them, but not sure if it switches the video cards itself.
I also have bbswitch installed.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Last edited by wakeup12 (2014-09-27 14:29:19)

Hello,
Can you please explain in a little more detail the scenario you testing? Are you comparing a SQL Database in Europe against a SQL Database in India? Or a SQL Database with a local, on-premise SQL Server installation?
In case of the first scenario, the roundtrip latency for the connection to the datacenter might play a role.
If you are comparing to a local installation, please note that you might be running against completely different hardware specifications and without network delay, resulting in very different results.
In both cases you can use the below blog post to assess the resource utilization of the SQL Database during the operation:
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/11/azure-sql-database-introduces-new-near-real-time-performance-metrics/
If the DB utilizes up to 100% you might have to consider to upgrade to a higher performance level to achieve the throughput you are looking for.
Thanks,
Jan

Similar Messages

Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box

Hi,
Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box (Located in Europe)
Below query returns 500,000 rows in 18 Min. on SQL Azure box (connected via SSMS, located in India)
SELECT * FROM TABLE_1
Whereas, on local server it returns 500,000 rows in (30 sec.)
SQL Azure configuration:
Service Tier/Performance Level : Premium/P1
DTU       : 100
MAX DB Size : 500GB
Max Worker Threads : 200
Max Sessions     : 2400
Benchmark Transaction Rate      : 105 transactions per second
Predictability : Best
Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,

Hello,
Can you please explain in a little more detail the scenario you testing? Are you comparing a SQL Database in Europe against a SQL Database in India? Or a SQL Database with a local, on-premise SQL Server installation?
In case of the first scenario, the roundtrip latency for the connection to the datacenter might play a role.
If you are comparing to a local installation, please note that you might be running against completely different hardware specifications and without network delay, resulting in very different results.
In both cases you can use the below blog post to assess the resource utilization of the SQL Database during the operation:
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/11/azure-sql-database-introduces-new-near-real-time-performance-metrics/
If the DB utilizes up to 100% you might have to consider to upgrade to a higher performance level to achieve the throughput you are looking for.
Thanks,
Jan

IR Report found 1 million record with blob files performance is too slow!

we are using
oracle apex 4.2.x
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
mod_plsql with Apache
Hardware: HP proliant ML350P
OS: WINDOWS 2008 R2
customized content management system developed in apex.when open the IR report have 1 ml rows found and each rows have blob(<5MB as pdf/tiff/bmp/jpg) it will be raising rows in future! but the searching performance is very slow!
how can increasing the performance?
how can showing progressing status to user while searching progress going on IR report itself?
Thanx,
Ram

It's impossible to make definitive recommendations on performance improvement based on the limited information provided (in particular the absence of APEX debug traces and SQL execution plans), and lacking knowledge of the application requirements and access to real data.
As noted above, this is mainly a matter of data model and application design rather than a problem with APEX.
Based on what has been made available on apex.oracle.com, taking action on the following points may improve performance.
I have concerns about the data model. The multiple DMS_TOPMGT_MASTER.NWM_DOC_LVL_0x_COD_NUM columns are indications of incomplete normalization, and the use of the DMS_TOPMGT_DETAILS table hints at an EAV model. Look at normalizing the model so that the WM_DOC_LVL_0x_COD_NUM relationship data can be retrieved using a single join rather than multiple scalar subqueries. Store 1:1 document attributes as column values in DMS_TOPMGT_MASTER rather than rows in DMS_TOPMGT_DETAILS.
There are no statistics on any of the application tables. Make sure statistics are gathered and kept up to date to enable the optimizer to determine correct execution plans.
There are no indexes on any of the FK columns or search columns. Create indexes on FK columns to improve join performance, and on searched columns to improve search performance.
More than 50% of the columns in the report query are hidden and not apparently used anywhere in the report. Why is this? A number of these columns are retrieved using scalar subqueries, which will adversely impact performance in a query processing 1 million+ rows. Remove any unnecessary columns from the report query.
A number of functions are applied to columns in the report query. These will incur processing time for the functions themselves and context switching overhead in the case of the non-kernel dbms_lob.get_length calls. Remove these function calls from the query and replace them with alternative processing that will not impact query performance, particularly the use of APEX column attributes that will only apply transformations to values that are actually displayed, rather than to all rows processed in the query.
Remove to_char calls from date columns and format them using date format masks in column attributes.
Remove decode/case switches. Replace this logic using Display as Text (based on LOV, escape special characters) display types based on appropriate LOVs.
Remove the dbms_lob.get_length calls. Instead add a file length column to the table, compute the file size when files are added/modified using your application or a trigger, and use this as the BLOB column in the query.
Searching using the Search Field text box in the APEX interactive report Search Bar generates query like:
select
from
(select
from
(...your report query...)
) r
where ((instr(upper("NWM_DOC_REF_NO"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_DESC"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("SECTION_NAME"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("CODE_TYPE"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("REF_NUMBER_INDEX"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("DATE_INDEX"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("SUBJECT_INDEX"), upper(:apxws_search_string_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_SERIEL"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_DESCRIPTION"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_STATUS"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("MIME_TYPE"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_FILE_BINARY"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0 ))
) r
where
rownum <= to_number(:APXWS_MAX_ROW_CNT)
This will clearly never make use of any available indexes on your table. If you only want users to be able to search using values from 3 columns then remove the Search Field from the Search Bar and only allow users to create explicit filters on those columns. It may then be possible for the optimizer to push the resulting simple predicates down into the inlined report query to make use of indexes on the searched column.
I have created a copy of your search page on page 33 of your app and created an After Regions page process that will create Debug entries containing the complete IR query and bind variables used so they can be extracted for easier performance analysis and tuning outside of APEX. You can copy this to your local app and modify the page and region ID parameters as required.

Camileo X Sports - SD card performance issue - too slow

Hello,
can anybody help me please.....when i tun on the cam and make the FIRST record it always shows me that the speed card is too slow, but i have sandisk 64gb extreme with 48mbs.....but it only dissapears at the first record and not the following.
what can i do....i have also the newest firmware.

yup! I had the same problem at first, i have the Samy EVO class 10 32G SDHC.
It's usually brilliant, actually it works fine with the 50 fps, 30 fps and even the 720p 120 fps.
However i found the problem easier than most people simply due to sheer coincidence.
I left the screen on while recording and right before i stopped recording (btw it never froze in my case it just stopped recording) and the screen displayed "low speed card"! what do you know!
I researched the issue and it turns out the Samsun EVO was a bit slower than what the camera required at 60 fps. at 50 fps it barely stopped recording once.
SanDisk Micro SDHC Extreme Class 3 32GB SDSDQXN-032G-G46A
This card is a relatively cheap one, it is a UHS class 3 which mean it's an Ultra High Speed card. The class 3 is a great ranking. It's like 10 Euros more expensive than the Samsun and from what i've read works great with the GoPro hero 4 while shooting 4K & 1080p at 120 fps so it should hold up very well.
It was never the upgrade or downgrade of the software. Lucky i left the screen on!

Sales & Order report performance is too slow!

Hi All,
Sales report is prety slow.It took 90% in OLAP time. I tried RSRT all the possible ways & also created OLAP fill query level also but No result. Please help me.
Thanks
Vasu.

Hi Vasu,
CAN You please refer below link
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BI/HowtoImproveQueryPerformance-A+Checklist
it tells explains how you can improve your query performace.
Also as i told since you are FETCHING DATA direct from MASTER data report will be bit slow so try to get data directly from cube and may be u can use filters also.
Hope this may help you.
Regards
Nilesh

Crystal Reports performance is too slow

Dear SDNers,
I have designed a crystal report which is fetching data from a Z developed function module. From crystal report side, used filters.But while executing report, it is calling the function module multiple times.
due to this performance is very bad. Why report is calling mutiple times of the function module. Do need to modify from crystal report side or from function module side. Please clarify.
Regards,
Venkat

A similar issue was seen a year ago It was regarding a function module call being executed multiple times from CR4Ent tool. It involved the usage of sub reports inside that report and the issue was generic for any function module used for testing.
At that time, the issue was resolved by upgrading to the latest available patch of CR4Ent and also by applying the latest patch at SAP R3 end.
If you are able to post the exact support package and patch level of CR4Ent and also for the SAP R3 system, then someone can tell whether its the latest or not.
-Prathamesh

SSRS performance is too slow

Hi,
I am using SQL Server 2008 R2 SP1. This simple query, "SELECT CustomerID FROM Customer", returns 42900 records. When It is executed within SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS), it literally takes zero (0) second. However, when this
same query is executed within SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) to feed a parameter, it takes about two (2) minutes to execute. This same performance issue occurs when the report calls the stored procedure which serves as the main dataset for
the report_ on SSMS the stored procedure takes under 3 seconds; on SSRS about 7 minutes.
Would you please help me Identify the source of the problem, and the possible solution?
Thank you!

Thank you all for your comments.
Andrew,
The "Executionlog3" view yields this info:
<AdditionalInfo>
<ProcessingEngine>2</ProcessingEngine>
<ScalabilityTime>
    <Pagination>0</Pagination>
    <Processing>0</Processing>
</ScalabilityTime>
<EstimatedMemoryUsageKB>
    <Pagination>18</Pagination>
    <Processing>14807</Processing>
</EstimatedMemoryUsageKB>
<DataExtension>
    <SQL>1</SQL>
</DataExtension>
</AdditionalInfo>
and
TimeProcessing = 1768; TimeRendering = 677; ByteCount = 88353
The performance issue happens when the report is reading from SQL Server database, even for a simple query such as "SELECT DISTINCT CustomerID FROM Customer". This exact same query takes literaly zero (0) second to fetch results when run
directly within SQL Server Management Studio.
Any other suggestions, please?
Thank you!

BI Server performance too slow

Hi experts,
I am facing an issue, my OBIEE sits on a Unix Platform. And many time the server performance is too slow, when I check the processes, Java under Orabi user is using more than 50% of the CPU utilization. I need to find the root cause behind it, as it is the production system and is affecting many users.
Thanks in advance.
MT

Thanks Prassu,
Yes the Server is performing too much calculations, but they are required as need to cache reports at daily level also,
I have an observation that the MAX_CACHE_ENTRY_SIZE [MAX_CACHE_ENTRY_SIZE = 1 MB;] parameter is set only for 1 MB, I can understand that if any query fetching more data than 1 MB will not be cached. But is there any chance that this will affect the server as well.
Thanks
MT

Performance too Slow on SQL Azure box

Hi,
Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box:
Below query returns 500,000 rows in 18 Min. on SQL Azure box (connected via SSMS)
SELECT * FROM TABLE_1
Whereas, on local server it returns 500,000 rows in (30 sec.)
SQL Azure configuration:
Service Tier/Performance Level : Premium/P1
DTU       : 100
MAX DB Size : 500GB
Max Worker Threads : 200
Max Sessions     : 2400
Benchmark Transaction Rate      : 105 transactions per second
Predictability : Best
Thanks,

Hello,
Please refer to the following document too:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/0/D20E1C5F-72EA-4505-9F26-FEF9550EFD44/Performance%20Guidance%20for%20SQL%20Server%20in%20Windows%20Azure%20Virtual%20Machines.docx
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

Application response too slow- How to resolve (webLogic)

Hi All, Can you please let me know what are all the main areas that i need to concentrate in the weblogic application server if i get the complaint from the clients saying "application performance is too slow".
Edited by: user11361691 on Apr 21, 2010 12:18 AM

you need to check the following:
1: Check the server log files to find any errors at the time when the Client is complaining about the server performance.
2: You can enable the GC logs in the server log and can check whether the there is any issues with the memory usage of the server. From the GC logs you can that whether the time has been taken to to the GC and hence you can try allocating higher memory or you can try changing the GC algorithm according to the analysis.
For details refer the following link:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13222_01/wls/docs100/perform/topten.html
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13222_01/wls/docs100/perform/JVMTuning.html
3: Finally you can collect the thread dumps snap shots and can see whether there are any stuck threads or deadlock situation in the server at the time of slow performance.

My Dual 1.8 G5 too slow on color performances

I send my FCP project to color but unfortunately my dual 1.8 with 3.5 ram, nvidia 6600 open gl won't perform at its best. I know for color application XT1900 is recommended but please the base recommended specs showed that i did have the baseline requirements.
Any idea how to get my dual 1.8 go a little bit faster. adding more ram or what? Tried to put color FX into 20 secs clip takes 30 to 1 mins. Wow its way too slow though. Try to play the clip also takes more secs to mins to runs. I'm wondering why this happen and it should can go just a bit faster. Any help/advice much appreciated

Oh ya i knew it. I owned this PMG5 since it first released and planning to buy the best and good one but not affordable. I love this machine but future technology is highly in demand. I just updated the graphic card from its original to the latest i have and pretty much can go to started the color app but way to far to execute a full project. Eager to buy the Mac Pro but have wait though. huh huh!
Runs benchmark for nvidia GeFOrce 6600 and scored at 5326 - 400FPS. Not that i know, just did some test and open few applications simultoneously with color but got frustrated because its hang for a mins to runs on every apps.
Thank you for your opinion and obviously my machine is going to obsolete in the near future. It can go for small graphic applications and final cut pro but FCP seems to slow either, render clips for 1 - 2 mins with transitions and fx would go for 30 mins to 40 mins. Harghhhh! i must get the new one!

I am using iphone 4s ios6.1.2 ...my iphone has become too slow once i have updated from ios 5.1.1..can anyone help me to make my iphone perform batter

i am using iphone 4s ios6.1.2 ...my iphone has become too slow once i have updated from ios 5.1.1..can anyone help me to make my iphone perform batter

Standard troubleshooting...
Try a reset by pressing the home and sleep buttons until you see the Apple logo, ignoring the slider. Takes about 5-15 secs of button holding and you won't lose any data or settings.
Remove all apps from Recently Used list...
- From any Home Screen, double tap the home button to bring up the Recents List
- Tap and hold any icon in this list until they wiggle
- Press the red to delete apps from this list.
- Press the home button twice when done.
If still a problem restore with your backup.
If still a problem restore as new, i.e. without your backup. See how it runs with nothing synced to it.
If still a problem, it's likely a hardware issue.

No Audio Playback due to Error Message "Disk is too slow. (Prepare) (-10001)"

Out of the blue, no audio playback. Was working just fine earlier today.
I repeatedly get the error message:
Disk is too slow. (Prepare)
(-10001)
NOTE: I have more than enough disc space. That is NOT the issue.
I also just got a second error message:
Part of the Project was not played
This project has too many real instrument tracks to be played in real-time. To optimize performance, see the 'Optimizing GarageBand performance' page in GarageBand Help.
NOTE: Odd as I have only 2 tracks in the GarageBand file.
Any others experience this? Suggestions?

Have a look into the Preferences folder (YourUserFolder/Libraries/Preferences/) and trash all Logic preferences.
You'll have to setup the program again.
cheers
rob

Select Data from aufm too slow

Hi experts,
I have a query in my report but its performance too slow.
is there any proper way or any way to improve the performance of below query.
SELECT * FROM aufm     into table i_aufm          " collecting input material document numbers
         WHERE mblnr GE '4900000000'
           AND mjahr GE '2008'
           AND zeile GT '0'
           AND matnr EQ matnr_101-matnr
           AND werks IN p_werks
           AND charg EQ matnr_101-charg
           AND bwart = '101'.

Hi,
1 .Dont use * from any table.
2. Create a internal table that u want to retrieve the data from that table. (Structure).
Eg:
types : begin of str_ekko,
           ebeln type ekko-ebeln,
           bsart type ekko-bsart,
           aedat type ekko-aedat,
           endof str_ekko.
data : itab type table of str_ekko,
        wa_itab type str_ekko.
In the above u want to take care that while creating the structure u want to look the sequence of fields in the table. in the same sequence u want to create the structure.
3 . The Select-options fields also wants be in the same field sequence of the table.
eg : select ebeln bsart aedat from ekko into table itab where ebeln in so_ebeln and
bsart in so_bsart and
                                                                                aedat in so_aedat.
4. If the above things are not working just look the indexes of that table. Just create a secondary index with ur requirement.

Why am I getting this error message, "Disk is too slow. (Prepare) (-10001)"

Hello all! I've been using GarageBand for a while now and I've accumulated quite a few files. Along with all of my movies and iTunes library, my internal hard drive filled up rapidly and I didn't catch it. I received a warning message on my screen one day saying that my hard drive was nearly full and I only had a few MB available. I'm using a 150 GB Solid State Hard Disk on my 2009 MacBook Pro (2.6 GHz Intel Cre 2 Duo, 4 GB of RAM). I remembered reading a while back that it's better to use an external hard drive for pretty much everything when using Garageband, so I bought one. I now have a seagate 500 GB, 5400 rpm external (USB 2.0) and I moved ALL of my movies and music over to it. I freed up around 60 GB of space on my internal hard drive in doing so.
So now that I've given you a little background, let me explain the issue I'm having. Before I noticed that my hard drive was full, I started receiving this error message:
Disk is too slow. (Prepare)
(-10001)
Upon receiving this message, I was unable to do pretty much anything in GarageBand. I couldn't listen to tracks, export to iTunes, or do anything! All I'm using GarageBand for is editing. My band and I do all our recording (and mixing) offsite at a separate studio and i just deliver a 2 track stereo signal (L/R) to my MacBook. From there, I just cut the individual tracks from a block of 30-45 minutes of recording because we just record our entire studio session and mix everything there. I pretty much never have more than two tracks and a few effects going at the same time.
After I realized that my disk was nearly full, I consulted my brother-in-law. He's head of the IT Deartpment at a major hospital here in West L.A. and he told me that I may have created a problem with the cache by filling up my internal hard drive and that I may still have issues with performance even after I free up space. He then told me that I may need to reboot my MacBook a few time to "free up the cache" (or something close to that, sorry guys I'm not that tech-savvy). It seems he may have been right, as I'm still experiencing the same issue. I rebooted around 10 times overall to no avail. I'm still using my internal hard drive to store the files that I'm working on (temporarily) because USB 2.0 is way too slow for my liking, when using GarageBand.
I've read quite a few articles on this offering solutions such as:
1. Do a complete Uninstall and Reinstall of GarageBand
2. Clone my hard drive to my external, format it, and reinstall everything back on it
3. Get a hard drive that supports Firewire 800 (The HDD I bought is USB 2.0, but it has two USB cables to increase speed, but I only have 1 port and I tried a powered USB Hub, but this HDD won't work with it for some reason).
4. Use different editing software.
5. Take it to Apple!
Will any of these things fix my problem? Are some better than others? Before I do anything, I wanted to ask this question on the furum to see if anybody had an easier (or cheaper!) solution. Any suggestions, tips, or advice would be much appreciated, as my band is starting to get on my case about finishing our CD! Thanks...

Have a look into the Preferences folder (YourUserFolder/Libraries/Preferences/) and trash all Logic preferences.
You'll have to setup the program again.
cheers
rob

Bumblebee performance is too slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for