Business rule problem with association

Hi,
i am facing an issue with business rules am not able to associate with planning outline in AAS console
Ram

Hi Ram,
Navigate to
1. C:\Hyperion\AnalyticAdministrationServices\storage\easusers\users.xml
2. Edit users.xml file
3. Update admin to "true" and save file.
4. For example,
EASUsers><EASUser directory="admin" email="[[email protected]]" external="true" fullName="EAS Administrator" id="1" isMigrated="false" password="A627FC9A6DEA834C1FA7772..........." roles="roles" supervisor="true" username="admin"/>
This should help you
5. After this, you restart RMI, AAS and planning services.
6. Now, it should work
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

Similar Messages

Business Rule - Problem with Validation Execution

I'm running into an issue where conditional Validation Execution is not working as expected. The background is that i have an Entity Object containing a few string attributes on which i must apply Regular Expression business rules to make sure only characters in a certain range is set. I am using a Not Matches regex on the following:
.*[^\u0020-\uD7FF].*1 attribute is required, 2 are optional. The problem I am experiencing is with the 2 optional attributes.
Since these are optional, I intended to use the Validation Execution tab so that the Rule is executed only when the attribute is not null. For example, here is what i tried for an attribute named Comments:
Comments != nullNo validation occurred when I entered an invalid value, such as a string containing line breaks, in a corresponding ADF Faces page. For the heck of it, i experimented by setting the validation execution to the opposite of what i should be - in other words, trigger validation if the attribute is null, such as:
Comments == nullWith this, the validation occurred as expected.
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something? I'm not particularly good with RegEx - is it possible this is due to some nuance of the expression?
Version: JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.
Thanks-
-george

i'm not sure if this is the correct answer or a workaround to the issue i had asked about. Given that caveat, if anyone else ever runs across this thread, what i found worked was to not use the attribute name in the Validation Execution tab's expression, but instead to just newValue as in the following:
newValue != null

How to Migrate Business rules along with access privileges

Hi All,
I migrated business rules from prod to dev using lcm. The business rules got migrated correctly, but the access privileges did not. I tried exporting from EAS and import. Even then the access privileges were not migrated.How do we migrate business rules along with access privileges? Quick help is much appreciated.
We are on hyp. planning 11.1.1.3. and we use classic planning applications.
Thanks
Lakshmi

If they are native users/groups then it may be down to the ID for the users/groups being different across environments, this has always been a problem with business rules, with planning applications then there is the updateusers utility to sync up the ID with shared services.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Validation Business Rule Problem

Hi Community
I´m working with SAP BPC 7.0 NW SP09 Consolidation, the problem I have is when I execute the validation package, the result of the Validation Rule because the business rule don´t respect the number sign of the value calculated.
For example I try to confirm this formula ASSETS = LIABILITIES + EQUITY
ASSETS      AST   1000
LIABILITIES LEQ     800
EQUITY        LEQ     400
RESULT                  -200
BUSINESS RULE      200
I was investigating all the posible combinations of dimensions, and I found it could be possible that this error occurs when (Liabilities + Equity) > Asset.
Rule
VAL01     ASSETS=LIABILITIES
Rule Details
Validation Account     Account 1     Flow 1     Sign 1     Account 2     Flow 2     Sign 2     REMARK
VAL01     ASSETS     F_CLO     1     LIABILITIES     F_CLO     1
ASSETS and LIABILITIES are configures as part of dimlist property, where Liabilities have all the equity accounts too.
Hope anyone help me with this problem
Thanks in advance

Hello Ruben
If Account: VAL01 is 'AST' account than Validation Business Rule will give 200 as the result.For 'LEQ' result will be -200.
I think the business rule is working as expected.
Hope this help.
Regards
Venkatesh KPS

Business Rule problem

Here is a problem I am not quite sure how to solve.
Given a collection of objects of type X, find out if there are two objects in that collection that meet certain criteria. For example, find out if there are two objects X1 and X2 such that X1.city=X2.city.
How does one go about writing a rule for this?
Thank you all,

Thank you!I try, try, and try again and finally I solved the problem!:-) I remember POV axis contains another information aboutversion.In detail, I have two form (A and B) identical except twoparameter: version in PAGE axis and account information in POVaxis.FormA contains "Mem1_A" in POV and version"Ver_A" in POV, whileFormB contains "Mem1_B" in POV and version"Ver_B" in POV. At this point, I can retrieve correctly "Mem1_A" or"Mem1_B", through run-time prompt with local variablecalled "FirstMember". I added another local variable,called "SecondMember", with feature "use byvalue" and set-up with a value. I added following code atbusiness rule: [FirstMember] ( IF (@ISMBR("Ver_A")) [SecondMember] ="Mem2_A"; ELSEIF (@ISMBR("Ver_B")) [SecondMember] ="Mem2_B"; ELSE ... at thispoint you can't arrive... if you set in PAGE axis only the versionsused in IF...ELSEIF ENDIF) In this way business rule retrieve correct value for FirstMemberand set-up correct value for SecondMember. In business rule code"core" I used only FirstMember and SecondMember to referaccount dimension. I hope this explanation is clear enough... I don't speak aperfect English :-(

Other Delete Business Rule Problem

Hello everybody
I have a problem with Oher delete business rules and the problem is for getting rowid for a deleted row and it causes ther error : no data found.
I solved this problem in this way
qms_transaction_mgt.process_rule_violation
( p_br_name => 'BR_TEAM004_DEL'
, p_msg_code => 'MS-00184'
, p_display_label => display_label
, p_table_name => 'ms_teams'
, p_table_rowid => null /* get_rowid */
In fact, I use null instead of get_rowid for this kind of rull. Is it a good way? Have every body any better way?
Thanks
Hassan

Hassan,
This is a known bug in the original Headstart 6i release. This bug was corrected in Headstart Patch 6.5.2.1 which is available via the Headstart Supplement Option. The Supplement Option can be purchase via your local consulting organization or the Oracle store. You will be given access to a portal from which you can download patches.
Regards,
Lauri

Tiggger-Business Rule Problem

Hi Guys
I have BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON ASSESSMENTS for each row which is doing some sort of validation for date.
IF INSERTING OR UPDATING then
v_involv_identifier := NVL(:new.identifier,:old.identifier);
IF :new.start_date is not null THEN
BEGIN
SELECT MIN(irole.start_date)
INTO v_irole_start
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF trunc(:new.start_date) > trunc(v_irole_start)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
END;
END IF;
IF :new.end_date is not null
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(irole.end_date)
INTO v_irole_end
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF v_irole_end is not null
AND trunc(v_irole_end) > trunc(:new.end_date)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
End;
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(irole.start_date)
INTO v_irole_start
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF v_irole_start is not null
AND v_irole_start > :new.end_date
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
          Now in AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON ASSESSMENTS for each row
          I am updating the values of Involvement_role(irole.start_date, irole.end_date) and
          Involments(start_date, end_date ) to temporary table and from there to respective table to avoid
          mutation.It works fine as expected in all cases.
          But I am unable to update when both InvolvementRole enddate and Invovement enddate are updated at same
          (Both are same date)or InvolvementRole startdate and Invovement startdate are updated at same time
          (Both are same date) because of business rule implemented.But from user prspect it should be able to
          update at the same time.
          After analysising I think it happening because of the max value of v_irole_end & v_irole_start which i m
          getting using the select statement which still coantain the old value.
          Say for example currenlty the InvolvementRole enddate=4/9/2009 and Invovement enddate=4/9/2009
          Now I m updating with value say InvolvementRole enddate=3/9/2009 and Invovement enddate=3/9/2009
          Now with select stm. the max value of v_irole_end=4/9/20099 (say)
          so this rule apply
          IF v_irole_end is not null
AND trunc(v_irole_end) > trunc(:new.end_date)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
          and it will not allow to update .
but if you update separately it will not cause any problem as the value of InvolvementRole enddate is
          already modifes and contain the new value (3/9/2009)
          Now question is it's frustrating to user.Can any one suggest how to over and allow user to update
          simulteneouly without violating B-Rules.
          For information I m updating the Involvement Role table before and then InvolvementTable.

1. db details
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
2.
for dml u can look into which updating ----
FOR c IN c_temp_id LOOP
IF c.action_ind = 'R' THEN
dbms_output.put_line('updating role for involvement '||c.identifier||
' to end on '||c.date_param1);
UPDATE involvement_roles
SET end_date = c.date_param1
WHERE involv_identifier = c.identifier;
-- AND end_date IS NULL;
end if ;
IF c.action_ind = 'Q' THEN
update INVOLVEMENTS
set end_date=c.date_param1
WHERE identifier = c.identifier;
End if;
END LOOP;
3. In after statement trigger
procedure is a called to update both table
IF UPDATING THEN
v_db_mode := 'U';
END IF;
involv_asprc(v_db_mode);
code inside procedure involv_asprc look like-----------------------
CURSOR v_del_record IS
select identifier involv_identifier
,action_ind
,text_param1 corgan_code
,text_param2 corgan_mapping_code
,numb_param1 person_identifier
,numb_param2 ounit_identifier_inv
from temporary_identifiers
where session_identifier = v_session
and target_tablename = 'INVOLV_EDIN'
and action_ind = 'D';
v_corgan_code VARCHAR2(4);
ounit_id VARCHAR2(30);
v_count NUMBER;
v_id NUMBER(10);
v_max_date DATE;
v_end_date DATE;
v_per_record NUMBER;
v_excep_desc VARCHAR2(1000);
v_name1 VARCHAR2(10);
v_person_id NUMBER(10);
--End JG167184
BEGIN
--Rc
FOR c IN c_temp_id LOOP
IF c.action_ind = 'R' THEN
dbms_output.put_line('updating role for involvement '||c.identifier||
' to end on '||c.date_param1);
UPDATE involvement_roles
SET end_date = c.date_param1
WHERE involv_identifier = c.identifier;
-- AND end_date IS NULL;
end if ;
IF c.action_ind = 'Q' THEN
update INVOLVEMENTS
set end_date=c.date_param1
WHERE identifier = c.identifier;
End if;
END LOOP;
end;

Problems with Associations between entities (jdev903production)

Hi,
every now and then, I feel a strong urge to pick up my pc and throw it out the window, when I'm working in jdeveloper.
But usually just in time I realise the power that bc4j still has, and the fact that people walking under my window might not be too pleased with my pc landing on their head convinces me to just count to 10, and just retry what I was trying to do.
I will explain the problems below:
1. Wrongly numbered and magically renumbered members
I have an entity with about 13 attributes. The underlying schema object is a view (simple view
on a table, nothing fancy).
I have a few associations between this entity and several other entities, one of which is an association with itself (parent/child relation). Some of these associations have accessors, and the parent/child association has accessors both ways (getParent() and getChildren()).
When I compile, I get an error like this:
Error(399,12): duplicate case label.
This problem occurs because near the top of the file, the attributes have been defined as follows:
protected static final int ASSET = 0;
protected static final int PARENT = 1;
protected static final int PRICELINES = 2;
protected static final int CHILDREN = 3;
protected static final int ID = 0;
protected static final int CODE = 1;
protected static final int ENDDATE = 2;
protected static final int STARTDATE = 3;
protected static final int TYPE = 4;
The first 4 are from the association accessors, the rest (starting with ID) are attributes. Why do these get the same numbers?
I edited the first 4 lines and gave them increasing numbers that didn't conflict with any of the attributes. But each time I edit one of the associations, all of these lines get renumbered again and start counting at 0! (even if I move the lines down so they are in the correct order).
So even if I just edit the parent/child association, even the PRICELINES (which is an accessor NOT from the association I'm editing) thing gets renumbered wrongly.
Why?!
2. Internal XML parser error
Every now and then, after playing around with associations and viewlinks, I suddenly get an error message like this:
"Expected Name instead of '<'."
from the XML parser, when I try to open a ViewObject from the navigator. The XML files look fine, but even a restart of jdeveloper doesn't help. In this case I usually delete my files, get the last known working versions from CVS and redo what I did before it went wrong. Because of the randomness (though quite frequent) of this problem, I can't provide you with good 'steps to reproduce' yet, but do you have any clue as to what might cause this? It's quite a nuisance.
Greetings,
Ivo

[list]
[*]Wrongly numbered and magically renumbered members
We just found and fixed a problem for 9.0.4 yesterday where in some cases
the constants for the accessors got inadvertently renumbered.
I hope it's the same issue you're hitting, but I cannot
be 100% sure unless you could send me a testcase project
for me to try and reproduce with 9.0.3 and with the
fixed 9.0.4 release.
[*]Internal XML parser error
An error like "Expected Name instead of '<'." can mean some kind of corruption in the XML file. When you say they "look" fine, are you able to verify by trying to parse them externally to make sure it's not some subtle error your eye is not seeing?
If you can give me a testcase project and tell me what steps to try and repeat, I can have our QA team try and exercise your steps to hopefully reproduce the problem.
[*]View Accessors are not being created
You mentioned a source control system in the mix. Is there any possibility that the YourViewImpl.java file is read-only on the file system? This would cause BC4J to not be able to write the accessor into the file.
[*]Magically disappearing ViewLink source/destination attributes
Obviously, this is not intentional. I'll ask the developer to see if
there's anything obvious that could be the cause of this
"short-circuit" of correct functionality.
[*]Dependencies not checked correctly when using entitylevel inheritance
"(no inheritance is possible on the view level)"
The above statement confused me. We do support View objects extending
other view objects, however I was able to reproduce the problem
and I filed Bug#2678090 to get it fixed.
[*]EVERY question/problem on the forum needs to be analyzed by a team member with 1 exclusive question: [How] Could have better documentation / help file elimenated this problem?
Excellent point. And we are doing this!
[*]Don't get me wrong; if this weren't a super product; I would not be here.
Neither would we. ;->
Let's identify every remaining technical issue for you, ideally get a testcase to reproduce the problem, and then we'll fix it.
[*]And truly; thank you for taking this time with us. Not every company affords so many resources with their customers; let alone free downloads.
We believe it's a great 21st-century way to be in direct contact with our customers. The feedback we get here is awesome for the product!
[*](Hey! I Want to pay. Help me finish and sell my app!)
We want you help you finish faster, too. Keep the questions and issues coming and we're doing our best to address them.
[list]

Rules Problem with multiple XSD

Hi,
I've done a jdev project for SOA Suite 11g including only one Business Rules which could be call by a Webservice.
When I used 2 differents XSD to define 1 input fact and 1 output fact, the rule engine failed with an UNEXPECTED element Error
<fault>
<faultType>0</faultType>
<operationErroredFault>
<part name="payload">
<errorInfo>
<errorMessage>unexpected element (uri:"http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot", local:"CUSTOMER"). Expected elements are <{http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot}ADDRESS>,<{http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot}DedoublonnageRule>,<{http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot}StatusRule></errorMessage>
</errorInfo>
</part>
</operationErroredFault>
</fault>
When I use only one XSD file in my facts fou my input and outpout values. It runs Well.
Here are the facts definition with Multiple XSD FIle :
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_noQvj60LDl4/S4-J8DcFEkI/AAAAAAAAAKU/fAtlSMgFS_8/separatedSchemas.png
Here are the facts definition with Single XSD FIle :
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_noQvj60LDl4/S4-J78qnj0I/AAAAAAAAAKQ/U1JNnaJyK50/includedSchema.png
Could you please answer me how to use multiple xsd file in facts ?
Regards,
Jerome.

Hi,
Does anybody have any idea ?
Regards,
Jerome

Issue in business rules attahed with forms (11.1.2.2.300)

We have attached Business rules with relavent forms but when we run business rule from form some other rule is run instead.

Hi Bilal,
So the Sales_Value rule runs regardless of what rule you attach to the form?
How are you running the rule? Run on Save, or through a right click menu? Just by clicking the rule on the left?
Can you confirm that:
In the Administer Forms and Ad Hoc Grids screen, the "Production_Quantity" rule id definitely attached and that in the Properties tab, you have the correct box ticked for that rule (e.g. Run on Save etc).
Can you also make sure that the "Sales_Value" rule is NOT present in the form in the same screen?
Do you get the same results when you run via Smart View?
Have you deployed the application since you changed the form/Added the rule to the Form?

Creating Business Rule aborts with CX_WD_CONTEXT Exception

Dear experts,
when I want to create a business rule, it aborts with an error.
The URL call http://......../sap/bc/webdynpro/SAP/GRFN_AM_GAF_BUSINESS_RULE was terminated because of an error
Termination type: RABAX_STATE
The error occurs, when I am trying to set up the output format of the business rule ...
Has anybody of a guess what that could be?
Thanks in advance
Kind regards
Bernhard

solved

Problems with Association Rules

Hi all,
I am trying to use ODMr to run association rules and am getting the following error message:
Server task state: error
Server task detail:
ORA-40101: Data Mining System Error ORA-40101: Data Mining System Error ORA-40101: Data Mining System Error ODM_ASSOCIATION_MODEL-BUILD--20010
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 105
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 144
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 1396
ORA-00902: invalid datatype
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 105
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 144
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 1396
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.DBMS_DATA_MINING", line 305
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.DBMS_JDM_INTERNAL", line 157
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 86
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.DBMS_JDM_INTERNAL", line 179
ORA-06512: at line 1
This error is generated on the sample data as used in the ORACLE 10G Release 2 Data Mining Tutorial, and on other datasets that I tried.
My sense is that the algorithm is expecting data in the datatype of DM_NESTED_NUMERICALS, even though the documentation asks for transactional data. When I converted to nested columns, the prog errored out again as it was expecting a number rather than nested column.??

Hi Carolyn,
I reviewed the tutorial and tested out the example for Association Rules. The example uses SH.SALES and SH.PRODUCTS.
It worked fine.
ODMr converts the "transactional" data, in the case of Association Rules, into DM_NESTED_NUMERICALS.
When ODM documentation refers to transactional data, it implies the use of nested columns. This can be confusing given that older versions of ODM actually supported a "transactional format", which is now supported only through nested columns.
I copied the following view definition that was passed in to ODM to build the Association Rules model (based on the tutorial noted above). Take a look at them to get a better understanding on what ODMr is doing to prepare the data.
If you can give us a specific example including the tutorial table you used and the settings you specified in the Association Rules Wizard, I can review that to see what the problem might be.
Thanks, Mark
SELECT caseTable."DMR$CASE_ID", txnTable1."PROD_ID" FROM "DMUSER"."DM4J$VSALES657013432" caseTable, (SELECT "DMR$CASE_ID", CAST(COLLECT(DM_Nested_Numerical("NAME", "VALUE")) AS DM_Nested_Numericals) "PROD_ID" FROM "DMUSER"."DM4J$SALES423975876" GROUP BY "DMR$CASE_ID") txnTable1 WHERE caseTable."DMR$CASE_ID" = txnTable1."DMR$CASE_ID"
The view makes references to other tables/views defined below:
DM4J$VSALES657013432 is shown below:
SELECT distinct "DMR$CASE_ID" FROM
(SELECT "CUST_ID","TIME_ID", DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY "CUST_ID","TIME_ID") DMR$CASE_ID FROM "SH"."SALES")
ORDER BY "DMR$CASE_ID"
DM4J$SALES423975876 is shown below:
SELECT DMR$CASE_ID, CAST("PROD_ID" AS VARCHAR2(30)) as NAME, 1 as VALUE
FROM
(SELECT "PROD_ID", "CUST_ID","TIME_ID", DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY "CUST_ID","TIME_ID") DMR$CASE_ID FROM "SH"."SALES")
ORDER BY DMR$CASE_ID

Problem with Associations

I'm trying to build a simple prototype of our application using JDeveloper (9.0.3.10.35). I've started by building a set of entities to represent our core business. I'm trying to use the automagic BC4J application wizards to create a simplistic prototype.
I've gone through this process a couple of times with increasing complexity. However in the latest iteration, I've run into a problem. For one of my entity objects, any associations I create for it behave strangely. Anytime I add them to a UML diagram everything seems fine. I can manipulate everything fine. Save the diagram. Close it. Reopen it. Everything is fine. I exit JDev and restart it. Whenever I open a UML diagram with one of these associations, I get an error message and a dialog asking me to find a *.bas file.
After some nosing around in the XML, I discovered that these associations are missing a section in their name.xml file in the src tree.
The basic structure of my other association files is below. However, these problematic ones lack the <data> sections. Does anyone know where/how this <data> section is generated?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding='windows-1252'?>
<!DOCTYPE Association SYSTEM "jbo_03_01.dtd">
<Association
Name="Blah" >
<Data[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding='windows-1252'?>
<!DOCTYPE Association SYSTEM "jbo_03_01.dtd">
<Association
Name="Blah" >
<Data>
</Data>
<DesignTime>
</DesignTime>
<AssociationEnd
<Data>
</Data>
<AttrArray Name="Attributes">
</AttrArray>
<DesignTime>
</DesignTime>
</AssociationEnd>
<AssociationEnd
<Data>
</Data>
<AttrArray Name="Attributes">
</AttrArray>
<DesignTime>
</DesignTime>
</AssociationEnd>
</Association>

UWL sub rule problem with BPEMUWLConnector

Hi,
We had a issue now with 1 user, he can create sub and the nominee can see it. But when other person create a rule and assign this person as nominee, he cannot see it.
Any idea what's the problem? We are currently using CE 7.2. THe BPEMUWLConnector in local.
Many thanks

Hi,
The template you used is different.
Try to create a java webdynpro iview and in the package you will find substitution application variant.
After creating the iview open the preview and here you can use CTRL plus right click and personalize.
Thanks and Regards,
gopal

Business Object problem with terminal server

Post Author: Yaron
CA Forum: Authentication
Hello, I have a problem running Business Object ( version 5.1.8 at the moment, we might change to XI soon ) on windows 2003 terminal server (citrix) and we have problems from every station without full administrative rights. Giving full access to either the folder or the entire HDD did not help.Difference is the Business Object starts by calling his COM object rather then the normal exe for authentication issues and i think it might be a part of the problem.Thanks in advanace and apologies if I posted in the wrong place.

Hello,
Thanks.
Pinging from client is successful.
And the repository is not accessible from the client side.
We install the client tool in other computer and we still can't connect.
We got message : "Cant access repository"
I'll appreciate your help. Thanks.
Regards,
Eco

Business rule problem with association

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for