Business Rule problem

Here is a problem I am not quite sure how to solve.
Given a collection of objects of type X, find out if there are two objects in that collection that meet certain criteria. For example, find out if there are two objects X1 and X2 such that X1.city=X2.city.
How does one go about writing a rule for this?
Thank you all,

Thank you!I try, try, and try again and finally I solved the problem!:-) I remember POV axis contains another information aboutversion.In detail, I have two form (A and B) identical except twoparameter: version in PAGE axis and account information in POVaxis.FormA contains "Mem1_A" in POV and version"Ver_A" in POV, whileFormB contains "Mem1_B" in POV and version"Ver_B" in POV. At this point, I can retrieve correctly "Mem1_A" or"Mem1_B", through run-time prompt with local variablecalled "FirstMember". I added another local variable,called "SecondMember", with feature "use byvalue" and set-up with a value. I added following code atbusiness rule: [FirstMember] ( IF (@ISMBR("Ver_A")) [SecondMember] ="Mem2_A"; ELSEIF (@ISMBR("Ver_B")) [SecondMember] ="Mem2_B"; ELSE ... at thispoint you can't arrive... if you set in PAGE axis only the versionsused in IF...ELSEIF ENDIF) In this way business rule retrieve correct value for FirstMemberand set-up correct value for SecondMember. In business rule code"core" I used only FirstMember and SecondMember to referaccount dimension. I hope this explanation is clear enough... I don't speak aperfect English :-(

Similar Messages

Business Rule - Problem with Validation Execution

I'm running into an issue where conditional Validation Execution is not working as expected. The background is that i have an Entity Object containing a few string attributes on which i must apply Regular Expression business rules to make sure only characters in a certain range is set. I am using a Not Matches regex on the following:
.*[^\u0020-\uD7FF].*1 attribute is required, 2 are optional. The problem I am experiencing is with the 2 optional attributes.
Since these are optional, I intended to use the Validation Execution tab so that the Rule is executed only when the attribute is not null. For example, here is what i tried for an attribute named Comments:
Comments != nullNo validation occurred when I entered an invalid value, such as a string containing line breaks, in a corresponding ADF Faces page. For the heck of it, i experimented by setting the validation execution to the opposite of what i should be - in other words, trigger validation if the attribute is null, such as:
Comments == nullWith this, the validation occurred as expected.
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something? I'm not particularly good with RegEx - is it possible this is due to some nuance of the expression?
Version: JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.
Thanks-
-george

i'm not sure if this is the correct answer or a workaround to the issue i had asked about. Given that caveat, if anyone else ever runs across this thread, what i found worked was to not use the attribute name in the Validation Execution tab's expression, but instead to just newValue as in the following:
newValue != null

Validation Business Rule Problem

Hi Community
I´m working with SAP BPC 7.0 NW SP09 Consolidation, the problem I have is when I execute the validation package, the result of the Validation Rule because the business rule don´t respect the number sign of the value calculated.
For example I try to confirm this formula ASSETS = LIABILITIES + EQUITY
ASSETS      AST   1000
LIABILITIES LEQ     800
EQUITY        LEQ     400
RESULT                  -200
BUSINESS RULE      200
I was investigating all the posible combinations of dimensions, and I found it could be possible that this error occurs when (Liabilities + Equity) > Asset.
Rule
VAL01     ASSETS=LIABILITIES
Rule Details
Validation Account     Account 1     Flow 1     Sign 1     Account 2     Flow 2     Sign 2     REMARK
VAL01     ASSETS     F_CLO     1     LIABILITIES     F_CLO     1
ASSETS and LIABILITIES are configures as part of dimlist property, where Liabilities have all the equity accounts too.
Hope anyone help me with this problem
Thanks in advance

Hello Ruben
If Account: VAL01 is 'AST' account than Validation Business Rule will give 200 as the result.For 'LEQ' result will be -200.
I think the business rule is working as expected.
Hope this help.
Regards
Venkatesh KPS

Other Delete Business Rule Problem

Hello everybody
I have a problem with Oher delete business rules and the problem is for getting rowid for a deleted row and it causes ther error : no data found.
I solved this problem in this way
qms_transaction_mgt.process_rule_violation
( p_br_name => 'BR_TEAM004_DEL'
, p_msg_code => 'MS-00184'
, p_display_label => display_label
, p_table_name => 'ms_teams'
, p_table_rowid => null /* get_rowid */
In fact, I use null instead of get_rowid for this kind of rull. Is it a good way? Have every body any better way?
Thanks
Hassan

Hassan,
This is a known bug in the original Headstart 6i release. This bug was corrected in Headstart Patch 6.5.2.1 which is available via the Headstart Supplement Option. The Supplement Option can be purchase via your local consulting organization or the Oracle store. You will be given access to a portal from which you can download patches.
Regards,
Lauri

Tiggger-Business Rule Problem

Hi Guys
I have BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON ASSESSMENTS for each row which is doing some sort of validation for date.
IF INSERTING OR UPDATING then
v_involv_identifier := NVL(:new.identifier,:old.identifier);
IF :new.start_date is not null THEN
BEGIN
SELECT MIN(irole.start_date)
INTO v_irole_start
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF trunc(:new.start_date) > trunc(v_irole_start)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
END;
END IF;
IF :new.end_date is not null
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(irole.end_date)
INTO v_irole_end
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF v_irole_end is not null
AND trunc(v_irole_end) > trunc(:new.end_date)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
End;
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(irole.start_date)
INTO v_irole_start
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF v_irole_start is not null
AND v_irole_start > :new.end_date
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
          Now in AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON ASSESSMENTS for each row
          I am updating the values of Involvement_role(irole.start_date, irole.end_date) and
          Involments(start_date, end_date ) to temporary table and from there to respective table to avoid
          mutation.It works fine as expected in all cases.
          But I am unable to update when both InvolvementRole enddate and Invovement enddate are updated at same
          (Both are same date)or InvolvementRole startdate and Invovement startdate are updated at same time
          (Both are same date) because of business rule implemented.But from user prspect it should be able to
          update at the same time.
          After analysising I think it happening because of the max value of v_irole_end & v_irole_start which i m
          getting using the select statement which still coantain the old value.
          Say for example currenlty the InvolvementRole enddate=4/9/2009 and Invovement enddate=4/9/2009
          Now I m updating with value say InvolvementRole enddate=3/9/2009 and Invovement enddate=3/9/2009
          Now with select stm. the max value of v_irole_end=4/9/20099 (say)
          so this rule apply
          IF v_irole_end is not null
AND trunc(v_irole_end) > trunc(:new.end_date)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
          and it will not allow to update .
but if you update separately it will not cause any problem as the value of InvolvementRole enddate is
          already modifes and contain the new value (3/9/2009)
          Now question is it's frustrating to user.Can any one suggest how to over and allow user to update
          simulteneouly without violating B-Rules.
          For information I m updating the Involvement Role table before and then InvolvementTable.

1. db details
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
2.
for dml u can look into which updating ----
FOR c IN c_temp_id LOOP
IF c.action_ind = 'R' THEN
dbms_output.put_line('updating role for involvement '||c.identifier||
' to end on '||c.date_param1);
UPDATE involvement_roles
SET end_date = c.date_param1
WHERE involv_identifier = c.identifier;
-- AND end_date IS NULL;
end if ;
IF c.action_ind = 'Q' THEN
update INVOLVEMENTS
set end_date=c.date_param1
WHERE identifier = c.identifier;
End if;
END LOOP;
3. In after statement trigger
procedure is a called to update both table
IF UPDATING THEN
v_db_mode := 'U';
END IF;
involv_asprc(v_db_mode);
code inside procedure involv_asprc look like-----------------------
CURSOR v_del_record IS
select identifier involv_identifier
,action_ind
,text_param1 corgan_code
,text_param2 corgan_mapping_code
,numb_param1 person_identifier
,numb_param2 ounit_identifier_inv
from temporary_identifiers
where session_identifier = v_session
and target_tablename = 'INVOLV_EDIN'
and action_ind = 'D';
v_corgan_code VARCHAR2(4);
ounit_id VARCHAR2(30);
v_count NUMBER;
v_id NUMBER(10);
v_max_date DATE;
v_end_date DATE;
v_per_record NUMBER;
v_excep_desc VARCHAR2(1000);
v_name1 VARCHAR2(10);
v_person_id NUMBER(10);
--End JG167184
BEGIN
--Rc
FOR c IN c_temp_id LOOP
IF c.action_ind = 'R' THEN
dbms_output.put_line('updating role for involvement '||c.identifier||
' to end on '||c.date_param1);
UPDATE involvement_roles
SET end_date = c.date_param1
WHERE involv_identifier = c.identifier;
-- AND end_date IS NULL;
end if ;
IF c.action_ind = 'Q' THEN
update INVOLVEMENTS
set end_date=c.date_param1
WHERE identifier = c.identifier;
End if;
END LOOP;
end;

Business rule problem with association

Hi,
i am facing an issue with business rules am not able to associate with planning outline in AAS console
Ram

Hi Ram,
Navigate to
1. C:\Hyperion\AnalyticAdministrationServices\storage\easusers\users.xml
2. Edit users.xml file
3. Update admin to "true" and save file.
4. For example,
EASUsers><EASUser directory="admin" email="[[email protected]]" external="true" fullName="EAS Administrator" id="1" isMigrated="false" password="A627FC9A6DEA834C1FA7772..........." roles="roles" supervisor="true" username="admin"/>
This should help you
5. After this, you restart RMI, AAS and planning services.
6. Now, it should work
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

Business Rules not visible sometimes-via web and smartview

We use EPM 11.1.2.
we have a unique problem-Business rules (associated with forms)sometimes fail to appear either via web or smartview for our users.After logging out and back in,sometimes they appear again.
If we explicitly 'disconnect all' from smartview, close Excel, and go back in again, then the rules are visible.
It is becoming hard to tell when the users can or cannot see the business rules.
All users have the right provisioning-interactive user.
Has anybody seen this kind of behavior before?
We had a similar issue a while back-with eas web versus eas desktop client. Oracle gave us a specific fix for the eas business rules problem.
Edited by: 784749 on Sep 26, 2011 11:59 AM

Thats the strange thing; We use (native) groups to provision. This works fine for the other 5 users.
But even if I provision this one user for the Business Rules, they remain invisible to this user. (in Planning)
I discovered this morning that this user can create a new BR, but when I try to open it in AAS console I get an error
"Exception occured, Please check your log file for details."
Unfortunately, the log doesn't provide any more details. (even if I set the level to Debug)

Business Rules error-java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/hyperion/hbr/core/

Hey I recently applied the 11.1.1.3.04 service fix for calc mgr/planning which involved a few file changes for EAS as well.
I patched and re-deployed calc mgr/planning/eas without any issues in DEV
When I patched prod, and then redeployed the web servers, business rules is now failing.
This error is in the planning log:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/hyperion/hbr/core/HBRThinServer
and this error is in EAS log when I login to EAS:
ExecuteThread: '5' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' com.hyperion.hbr.db.DBTable - Error while creating Repository object. Please make sure your HBR Configuration is correct.
ExecuteThread: '5' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' com.hyperion.hbr.core.PluginDataManager - Error creating PluginDataManager. Please check your log file for details on what caused this error.
Anyone run into this issue and have any advice how to solve it? I also opened an issue with Oracle
THanks
Jeff

Thanks for the advice Nick.
I decided to redeploy EAS app server again, but this time also re-register the database. the register database step was not needed when I patched dev or test, perhaps because in dev and test planning and eas were on the same server. In prod, eas and planning are on different servers.
so after registering and re-using the existing tables so that I wouldn't lose my rules, the app deployed without any errors in the logs and all my business rule problems have been resolved.
Thanks
Jeff

Problem in setting participant in business rule

Hi All,
I am facing problem while setting the target participant in business rule. I want to route the task to the target participant for the adhoc routing in serial process .It's not taking the value as participant name.
I have 5 participant for approve d task .But when I am writing
If PreviousOutcome.outcome=="'REJECT'"
then
call GOTO(participant:"CTU")
as CTU is one of the participant in the process.
But it gives the error while deploying the application as unknown participant .Please tell me how come I route to different participant as per the condition in serial routing.
please help me.
Thanks & Regards
Aseet

Multi-post:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=727161&tstart=0

Problem with two of my business rule triggers

Good morning every one,
I have a small problem with two of my business rule triggers.
I have these tables:
pms_activity
csh_cash
csh_integrate_leh
csh_integrate_led
and my process goes like this:
upon approval of a row in my pms_activity table I have a trigger that insert a row in my csh_cash - and in the csh_cash table I have a trigger that will insert in the csh_ingerate_leh and csh_integrate_led.
my problem is pms_activity does generate a row in csh_cash but the trigger in the cash does not fire to generate a row in the csh_integrate_leh and led tables.
I have generated in the following order after I created my business rule:
I have generated the table from the designer (server module tab)
I have generated the CAPI from the head start utility
I have generated the API from the designer
I have generated the CAPI from the designer
I have run the recompil.sql
I have checked that my business rule trigger is enabled and should run on insert and no where restriction
=== this is my business rule logic ======
l_rule_ok boolean := true;
begin
trace('br_csh001_cev (f)');
csh_gl_pkg.csh_gen_integ_jvs(p_id
,p_ref_num
,p_own_id
,p_trt_id
,p_value_date
,p_description
,p_amount
,p_cur_id
,p_gla_dr
,p_gla_cr
,p_gla_pl
,p_gla_rev
,p_gla_eqt);
return l_rule_ok;
exception
when others
then
qms$errors.unhandled_exception(PACKAGE_NAME||'.br_csh001_cev (f)');
end br_csh001_cev;
==== end =======================
Any help will be appreciated as I have struggled with this for two days.
Thanks

hmmm...
Try resetting it again and restoring with the same backup file...
Does the phone work properly once you've reset it before you try restoring? A lot of people here have experienced problems restoring from backups... could be worth forgetting about it and starting from scratch.
You could try contacting your nearest Nokia Service Centre (www.nokia.com/repair) and see if they can do anything - it may need the firmware reinstalling or upgrading... possibly... give them a call though and see.
Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

Problem with business rule

Hi all,
I have a problem with a business rule (BR) deployed as a standalone Descision service.
the BR consists on a simple decision table wich compare an input (bigInteger) with 50. It returns two facts (as output).
the two conditions are confugured (i.e. <50 and >=50).
the Decision service (stateless) is called in a simple BPEL process. in some cases the the assign activity in the bpel process rise this exception :
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><selectionFailure xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/"><part name="summary"><summary>empty variable/expression result. The XPath variable or expression /ns5:callFunctionStatelessDecision/ns5:resultList/ns6:processResponse/ns6:CodeRetour is empty at line 440. An attempt to read or copy data referenced or computed by the XPath expression either had invalid data, according to the XML schema, or did not contain certain optional data. Ensure that the variable or expression result named in the error message is not empty. Enable XML schema validation of related variables to ensure the run-time data is valid. </summary></part></selectionFailure></bpelFault>
it seems like an output of the business rule used by the assign after the invoke activity is empty.
But in the input payload for the decision service all elements are not empty. I can't inderstand how the OBR return an empty variable?
Any help please?

In the taskflow you should be capable to trace step by step what happens in the execution. Does this give any clue, e.g. why sometimes the assert does not work?
cu
Andreas

Problem with FIX-Statement in Business Rule

Hello,
ich have a business rule with two nested FIX-Statements.
I calculate depending on the month in the runtime-prompt a forecast for this month. After that i fix on that month an clear some specific accounts. But some of these accounts still have data.
they are in the cleardata section and they are children of FiBuKonten from the first fix. When i leave out the @CHILDREN("FiBuKonten") in the first fix the accounts are cleared as excepted, but i need that fix because not all accounts are part of this forecast.
I changed everything to work as a calc-script and the same problem appears, on dev and prod database.
Why are some accounts cleared while others not ? Really misterious!
Here is the rule
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Year],[TEBIT_RTP_Version],"IFRS operativ",[TEBIT_RTP_Entity],"Daten brutto","Daten_brutto_P_M",@CHILDREN("FiBuKonten"))
[TEBIT_RTP_Period](
IF(@ISMBR("Jan"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Feb"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Apr"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Mar)/9 + Actual_kum->Mar,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("May"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Apr)/8 + Actual_kum->Apr,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Jul"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jun)/6 + Actual_kum->Jun,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Aug"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jul)/5 + Actual_kum->Jul,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Oct"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Sep)/3 + Actual_kum->Sep,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Nov"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Oct)/2 + Actual_kum->Oct,2);
ENDIF;)
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Period])
     CLEARDATA "41000000";
     CLEARDATA "41100000";
     CLEARDATA "41200000";
     CLEARDATA "41990000";
     CLEARDATA "41000900";
     CLEARDATA "41096000";
     CLEARDATA "41196000";
     CLEARDATA "41296000";
     CLEARDATA "41940000";
     CLEARDATA "42000000";
     CLEARDATA "42100000";
     CLEARDATA "42200000";
     CLEARDATA "42099000";
     CLEARDATA "42199000";
     CLEARDATA "42299000";
     CLEARDATA "42990000";
     CLEARDATA "41918000";
     CLEARDATA "41100900";
     CLEARDATA "42091000";
     CLEARDATA "42918000";
     CLEARDATA "54000000";
     CLEARDATA "54009000";
     CLEARDATA "54009900";
     CLEARDATA "54009600";
     CLEARDATA "54130200";
     CLEARDATA "93541175";
     CLEARDATA "54001000";
     CLEARDATA "54001900";
     CLEARDATA "54014000";
     CLEARDATA "54019000";
     CLEARDATA "54021000";
     CLEARDATA "54021900";
ENDFIX
ENDFIX
Thx for your help.
Greets
Kevin

Does it make a difference when a dimension has dynamic calc members and i dont fix on that dimension to fix on the Level 0 members of that dimension ? The result should be the same in my eyes.
SGF is dense. I found out that everytime i the fix includes that first member M_124100 the error occoured.
I changed the rule in the form that i split the FIX Statement. And now it works without the error and with all data cleared. Even when i don`t reorder the dimension SGF.
Again thanks for your help.
Greets
Kevin
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Year],[TEBIT_RTP_Version],"IFRS operativ",[TEBIT_RTP_Entity],"Daten brutto","Daten_brutto_P_M")
FIX(@CHILDREN("FiBuKonten"))
[TEBIT_RTP_Period](
IF(@ISMBR("Jan"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Feb"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Apr"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Mar)/9 + Actual_kum->Mar,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("May"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Apr)/8 + Actual_kum->Apr,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Jul"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jun)/6 + Actual_kum->Jun,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Aug"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jul)/5 + Actual_kum->Jul,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Oct"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Sep)/3 + Actual_kum->Sep,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Nov"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Oct)/2 + Actual_kum->Oct,2);
ENDIF;)
ENDFIX
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Period])
CLEARDATA "41000000";
CLEARDATA "41100000";
CLEARDATA "41200000";
CLEARDATA "41990000";
CLEARDATA "41000900";
CLEARDATA "41096000";
CLEARDATA "41196000";
CLEARDATA "41296000";
CLEARDATA "41940000";
CLEARDATA "42000000";
CLEARDATA "42100000";
CLEARDATA "42200000";
CLEARDATA "42099000";
CLEARDATA "42199000";
CLEARDATA "42299000";
CLEARDATA "42990000";
CLEARDATA "41918000";
CLEARDATA "41100900";
CLEARDATA "42091000";
CLEARDATA "42918000";
CLEARDATA "54000000";
CLEARDATA "54009000";
CLEARDATA "54009900";
CLEARDATA "54009600";
CLEARDATA "54130200";
CLEARDATA "93541175";
CLEARDATA "54001000";
CLEARDATA "54001900";
CLEARDATA "54014000";
CLEARDATA "54019000";
CLEARDATA "54021000";
CLEARDATA "54021900";
ENDFIX
ENDFIX

Problem with Business Rules in OBPM 10.3.1 Enterprise for WebLogic

We're having a problem with our Business Rules. We've updated two of our business rules (that are used by business rule transitions) in Studio; however, when we publish the updated process, the business rules are not updated. We cannot find anywhere in the Process Admin where to administer the rules to make sure they're overwritten.
I've double checked, and the updated rule code is in the .project.xpdl, but for whatever reason, the rules are not being updated during the deployment. I'm sure that we've done this many times in the past, but for some reason, now it is not working.
We're tried variations of the different versioning when we publish, and we've also tried to unpublish all of the older versions of our process, but it does not change the business rules. We can try to unpublish and undeploy, but it seems like we would lose all old instances of that process that are still running if we did that.
Has anyone ever had this issue, or know if there is a way to effect the business rules via the process admin?

I see what you're saying, but here's why it works the way you're observing it.
Once deployed, the 10g business rules are edited by a business user (the owner of the rule). Changes in Studio that a developer makes to a business rule don't override the changes that the business user made.
To let the business owner edit the rule, add a Global Interactive activity and change its property setting to edit the business rule. Put this activity in the role for the business owner (the person you want to edit the rule).
Dan

Problem in mapping Task payload parameters to Oracle Business Rules facts

Hi all,
We are using complex types from our project XSDs inside the Human Task payload. We intend to use these Human Task payload parameters to build routing rules using the Oracle Business Rules interface. Our observation is that when the complexity of these complex types increase, the business rules editor does not show these as facts that can be used in formulating rules.
Has anybody faced such a problem before. Any help is appreciated.
We are using the following link to add routing rules –
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25054_01/dev.1111/e10224/bp_decision.htm
Version details :
ADF Business Components     11.1.1.60.13
Java(TM) Platform     1.6.0_29
Oracle IDE     11.1.1.5.37.60.13
SOA Composite Editor     11.1.1.5.0.01.74
Thanks,
Yamini.

Problem solved. There was an element in the xml schema that had nillable = true. Because of this the XML Fact for that element would no longer be available in the BPEL Process. Removing the nillable and generating the XML Facts again solved the missing variable problem.

Problem in Business Rule Framework (BRF).

Hi,
Problem in Business Rule Framework (BRF).
Facing problem while assining the 'Expression and Actions' to the Events in BRF giving the error 'Class ID is missing'.
Created an event called 'Z_My_Event_01' of implementation class '0E001', object (Event) is created succesfully but while assining the Expression and Action to that Event it shows the error 'Class ID is missing'.
Thanks
Rajiv Garg

Hi Rajiv,
this might help u.
Business Rule Framework Transactions:
BRFEVT01 - BRF: Create Event
BRFEVT02 - BRF: Change Event
BRFEVT03 - BRF: Display Event
BRF - Business Rule Framework
BRFACS01 - BRF: Create Abstract Action
BRFACS02 - BRF: Amend Abstract Action
BRFACS03 - BRF: Display Abstract Action
BRFACT01 - BRF: Create Actions
BRFACT02 - BRF: Change Actions
BRFACT03 - BRF: Display Actions
BRFAPC01 - BRF: Create Features for Appl.Class
BRFAPC02 - BRF: Change Features for Appl. Class
BRFAPC03 - BRF: Display Features for Appl.Class
BRFAPL01 - BRF: Create Application Class
BRFAPL02 - BRF: Change Application Class
BRFAPL03 - BRF: Display Application Class
BRFEXP01 - BRF: Create Expression
BRFEXP02 - BRF: Change Expression
BRFEXP03 - BRF: Display Expression
BRFIMC01 - BRF: Create Impl. Class
BRFIMC02 - BRF: Change Impl. Class
BRFIMC03 - BRF: Display Impl. Class
BRFRLS01 - BRF: Create Rule Set
BRFRLS02 - BRF: Change Rule Set
BRFRLS03 - BRF: Display Rule Set
BRFRUL01 - BRF: Create Rule for Event
BRFRUL02 - BRF: Change Rule for Event
BRFRUL03 - BRF: Change Rule for Event
BRFU01 - BRF: Compare SAPscript Texts
BRF_FILL_TBRF185 - Automatic Filling for TBRF185
BRF_OVERVIEW - Overview of BRF Objects
Visit following link:
http://www.sap.com/industries/insurance/pdf/FSCM_BRF.pdf
pls reward if useful.
cheers,
hema.

Business Rule problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for