BW Hierarchy drill issues

Hi all,
I'm having issues in webi when drill down to the lowest level of a hierarchy and that level contains no data. The symptom is that I get an empty table with no hierarchy label and no way to drill back up to the previous level. The report has to be closed in order to go back to the higher levels. There are no errors evident in any logs. If I run the mdx from the mdx logs in mdxtest I get no data returned. I found a forum post on BOB that suggests applying the following SAP notes
1402674  - MDX: Descendants delivers incorrect results for NON EMPTY
1404328 - MDX: bXML flattening and PROPERTIES: Columns overwritten
Both have been applied but the issue remains. Has anyone seen this before?
Business Objects Edge XI 3.1 SP2 on linux.
Integration Kit SP2
Thanks
Keith

Hi Keith,
We are facing the same problem!
Did you find any solution for it yet?
If so, can you please share it?
Kind regards,
Giovanni.

Similar Messages

  • Poor performance with WebI and BW hierarchy drill-down...

    Hi
    We are currently implementing a large HR solution with BW as backend
    and WebI and Xcelcius as frontend. As part of this we are experiencing
    very poor performance when doing drill-down in WebI on a BW hierarchy.
    In general we are experiencing ok performance during selection of data
    and traditional WebI filtering - however when using the BW hierarchy
    for navigation within WebI, response times are significantly increasing.
    The general solution setup are as follows:
    1) Business Content version of the personnel administration
    infoprovider - 0PA_C01. The Infoprovider contains 30.000 records
    2) Multiprovider to act as semantic Data Mart layer in BW.
    3) Bex Query to act as Data Mart Query and metadata exchange for BOE.
    All key figure restrictions and calculations are done in this Data Mart
    Query.
    4) Traditionel BO OLAP universe 1:1 mapped to Bex Data Mart query. No
    calculations etc. are done in the universe.
    5) WebI report with limited objects included in the WebI query.
    As we are aware that performance is an very subjective issues we have
    created several case scenarios with different dataset sizes, various
    filter criteria's and modeling techniques in BW.
    Furthermore we have tried to apply various traditional BW performance
    tuning techniques including aggregates, physical partitioning and pre-
    calculation - all without any luck (pre-calculation doesn't seem to
    work at all as WebI apparently isn't using the BW OLAP cache).
    In general the best result we can get is with a completely stripped WebI report without any variables etc.
    and a total dataset of 1000 records transferred to WebI. Even in this scenario we can't get
    each navigational step (when using drill-down on Organizational Unit
    hierarchy - 0ORGUNIT) to perform faster than minimum 15-20 seconds per.
    navigational step.
    That is each navigational step takes 15-20 seconds
    with only 1000 records in the WebI cache when using drill-down on org.
    unit hierachy !!.
    Running the same Bex query from Bex Analyzer with a full dataset of
    30.000 records on lowest level of detail returns a threshold of 1-2
    seconds pr. navigational step thus eliminating that this should be a BW
    modeling issue.
    As our productive scenario obviously involves a far larger dataset as
    well as separate data from CATS and PT infoproviders we are very
    worried if we will ever be able to utilize hierarchy drill-down from
    WebI ?.
    The question is as such if there are any known performance issues
    related to the use of BW hierarchy drill-down from WebI and if so are
    there any ways to get around them ?.
    As an alternative we are currently considering changing our reporting
    strategy by creating several higher aggregated reports to avoid
    hierarchy navigation at all. However we still need to support specific
    division and their need to navigate the WebI dataset without
    limitations which makes this issue critical.
    Hope that you are able to help.
    Thanks in advance
    /Frank
    Edited by: Mads Frank on Feb 1, 2010 9:41 PM

    Hi Henry, thank you for your suggestions although i´m not agree with you that 20 seconds is pretty good for that navigation step. The same query executed with BEx Analyzer takes only 1-2 seconds to do the drill down.
    Actions
    suppress unassigned nodes in RSH1: Magic!! This was the main problem!!
    tick use structure elements in RSRT: Done it.
    enable query stripping in WebI: Done it.
    upgrade your BW to SP09: Has the SP09 some inprovements in relation to this point ?
    use more runtime query filters. : Not possible. Very simple query.
    Others:
    RSRT combination H-1-3-3-1 (Expand nodes/Permanent Cache BLOB)
    Uncheck prelimirary Hierarchy presentation in Query. only selected.
    Check "Use query drill" in webi properties.
    Sorry for this mixed message but when i was answering i tryied what you suggest in relation with supress unassigned nodes and it works perfectly. This is what is cusing the bottleneck!! incredible...
    Thanks a lot
    J.Casas

  • Approval hierarchy to issue Minimum safety stock

    Hi Guys,
    We have a requirement to have an automated approval hierarchy for issuing the inventory below a safety stock limit defined. How can we achieve that. I know that there is some option as "minimum safety stock" in SAP, but we need that a workfklow to be activated when the stock reaches to this level and only after approval it should be allowd to be issued. Is it possible to implement?

    Hi,
        There is no approval concept in this case. But you may check the below work around, Activate availability check for the material. Then you may maintain the message  M7181 as user specific and maintain it as error message for the users who are NOT supposed to issue the goods below the safety stock. Refer the thread: message to be make error for specific user id
       You may create a program to find the materials with stock equal to safety stock and send the result. You may schedule the job in background with specific interval.  Also refer the thread: Material alert workflow
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Hierarchy drill down issue at the lowest level

    Hi,
    In OBIEE 11.1.1.5 I face an issue with drill down to lowest level of presentation hierarchy (expanded by "+" in report). It happens only for combination of 2 dimensions presentation hierarchies in analytics report (parent-child organizational structure + level based product categorization). Aggregated date comes from OLAP but lowest level product information comes from relational database and this details are not displayed.
    First I drill to particular sales rep in organizational structure. Then for that sales rep I need to drill down product hierarchy and it works except lowest level of details. At the lowest level of product hierarchy, query sent to database (I have it from logs) return proper results (checked directly in db) but report behaves the way like there are no details at the lowest level and product details are not displayed.
    Both (Organizational structure, Product) dimension presentation hierarchies works ok at all levels when used separately. Also product hierarchy works well at all levels (including OLAP->relational drill) when used togather with other level-based hierarchies in subject area.
    I am wondering what I could have done wrong...
    Advices are very welcome!

    Hierarchy keys are set properly and "use for display" is checked.
    Dimension presentation hierarchies does not work only when I use particular two hierarchies togather in one report table. When each of hierarchies is displayed separately it works ok.

  • OBIEE 11g Hierarchy expanding issue

    Hi Experts,
    I have an Analysis report which I display hierarchy and I have many reports which contain hierarchy.
    But I have a specific report which only expand up to 1 level only unlike my other Analysis reports which display the hierarchy up to the last level.
    This report that only expand up to 1 level have many records (about 1.5K).
    Can you help me fix/resolve this issue about the hierarchy
    My OBIEE version is: 11.1.1.6 (11.1.1.6.0.120104.0152.000 to be exact).
    My hierarchy is properly displayed in other reports but one of my reports, the hierarchy is not displaying well.
    SCENARIO:
    all reports have same hierarchy fields to be displayed:
    report 1 (displays only 50 records or less) - good
    report 2 (displays only 50 records or less) - good
    report 3 (displays only 50 records or less) - good
    report 4 (displays more than 1000 records) - not working
    Thanks,

    Hi JaiG,
    My OBIEE version is: 11.1.1.6 (11.1.1.6.0.120104.0152.000 to be exact).
    Yes, the hierarchy is defined is defined in the repository.
    My hierarchy is properly displayed in other reports but one of my reports, the hierarchy is not displaying well.
    SCENARIO:
    all reports have same hierarchy fields to be displayed:
    report 1 (displays only 50 records or less) - good
    report 2 (displays only 50 records or less) - good
    report 3 (displays only 50 records or less) - good
    report 4 (displays more than 1000 records) - not working
    Thanks,
    any updates experts? :(
    Edited by: OBIEE Learner on Dec 13, 2012 12:42 AM

  • Action Link in obiee 11g for a Hierarchy Drill Down Level

    Hi
    Requirement is:
    We have a Time Dimension Hierarchy with drill down Levels(Year, Qtr, Month, Day). So now i wanted to provide an action link on detailed column(day) which will navigate to other report. I have tried doing it but unable to get the actual solution.
    Can anyone throw some ideas on how to achieve this.
    Thank You

    Hi,
    Can u tell me whats the error you r getting over ther,
    Use the hierarchy flow, starts with the + symbol,
    edit the column properties and go for interaction tab and give action link + drill
    check the columns between the 2 reports and assign prompts between the reports then you can get the correct one.
    Regards,
    VG

  • Illegal argument error while performing hierarchy drill down using RESTful SDK

    As per SAP Web Intelligence RESTful web service SDK User Guide, trying to perform a drill on a webi report using a POST req as below -
    https://<serverName>:7555/biprws/raylight/v1/documents/<docID>/reports/<reportID>/driller/instructions
    Req body -
    <instruction type="Down">
        <elementId><VTable ID></elementId>
        <from>
            <drillElement>
                <id>DP0.DO6</id>
               <filterValue><filter value></filterValue>
            </drillElement>
        </from>
        <to>
            <drillElement>
                <id>DP0.DO7</id>
                <hierarchyId>DP0.DH1</hierarchyId>
            </drillElement>
        </to>
    </instruction>
    Below is the error I am getting in the response. Looks like some issue with the Request body. please suggest.
    400 Bad Request
    <error>
       <error_code>WSR 00102</error_code>
       <message>Illegal argument</message>
       <stack_trace>com.sap.webi.raylight.RaylightException: Illegal argument
    at com.sap.webi.raylight.context.Messenger.createException(Messenger.java:57)
    at com.sap.webi.raylight.actions.driller.DrillInstructionAction.throwInvalidBodyWithIllegalArgument(DrillInstructionAction.java:399)
    at com.sap.webi.raylight.actions.driller.DrillInstructionAction.execute(DrillInstructionAction.java:130)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor7014.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at com.sap.webi.raylight.actions.ActionInvoker.invokeWith(ActionInvoker.java:123)
    at com.sap.webi.raylight.actions.ActionDispatcher.invoke(ActionDispatcher.java:105)
    at com.sap.webi.raylight.RaylightServiceDriller.drill(RaylightServiceDriller.java:345)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor7013.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at org.apache.cxf.service.invoker.AbstractInvoker.performInvocation(AbstractInvoker.java:173)
    at org.apache.cxf.service.invoker.AbstractInvoker.invoke(AbstractInvoker.java:89)
    at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSInvoker.invoke(JAXRSInvoker.java:164)
    at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSInvoker.invoke(JAXRSInvoker.java:242)
    at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSInvoker.invoke(JAXRSInvoker.java:242)
    at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSInvoker.invoke(JAXRSInvoker.java:242)
    at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSInvoker.invoke(JAXRSInvoker.java:242)
    at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSInvoker.invoke(JAXRSInvoker.java:91)
    at org.apache.cxf.interceptor.ServiceInvokerInterceptor$1.run(ServiceInvokerInterceptor.java:58)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
    at org.apache.cxf.workqueue.SynchronousExecutor.execute(SynchronousExecutor.java:37)
    at org.apache.cxf.interceptor.ServiceInvokerInterceptor.handleMessage(ServiceInvokerInterceptor.java:106)
    at org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:255)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.ChainInitiationObserver.onMessage(ChainInitiationObserver.java:113)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.ServletDestination.invoke(ServletDestination.java:102)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.ServletController.invokeDestination(ServletController.java:464)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.ServletController.invoke(ServletController.java:149)
    at com.sap.bip.rs.server.servlet.BIPServletController.invoke(BIPServletController.java:93)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractCXFServlet.invoke(AbstractCXFServlet.java:148)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractHTTPServlet.handleRequest(AbstractHTTPServlet.java:179)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractHTTPServlet.doPost(AbstractHTTPServlet.java:103)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:641)
    at org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractHTTPServlet.service(AbstractHTTPServlet.java:159)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at com.businessobjects.sdk.actionfilter.WorkflowFilter.doFilter(WorkflowFilter.java:45)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:222)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:123)
    at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:472)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)
    at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:99)
    at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:929)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)
    at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1002)
    at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:585)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:312)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:761)
    </stack_trace>
    </error>

    hello Rekha,
    1. First I guess that the red parts:
    <instruction type="Down">
        <elementId><VTable ID></elementId>
        <from>
            <drillElement>
                <id>DP0.DO6</id>
               <filterValue><filter value></filterValue>
            </drillElement>
        </from>
        <to>
            <drillElement>
                <id>DP0.DO7</id>
                <hierarchyId>DP0.DH1</hierarchyId>
            </drillElement>
        </to>
    </instruction>
    ... are in your real workflow, effectively replaced by significant values.
    2. then, thanks to the stack trace: this error should be thrown if DP0.DO6 is not used by <VTable ID>.
    Can you please check with [GET application/xml] .../raylight/v1/documents/<docId>/reports/<reportId>/elements/<VTable ID> ?
    3. Anyway, the error message thrown is totally not talkative and we'd better improve that. Which version are you using? 4.1 SP5 ?
    Thanks and regards,
    eric

  • OBIEE 11g: Hierarchy Drills & Graph Scales

    Hi eveyrone,
    I have a time-series graph with dates along the x-axis and my measure value along the y-axis.
    In the "Sections" portion of the graph I have a node based hierarchy.
    I have 4 columns in the report.
    Presentation hierarchy (node based hierarchy), Hierarchy Dimension column (regular FK link to the hierarchy dimension but not a presentation hierarchy), Date, SUM( Metric by hierarchy dimension column)
    In the graph, I create a line scale marker and set it to be based on my one measure column. I also graph my one measure column.
    In therory, since I'm graphing the EXACT same column that the scale marker is tied to, they should ALWAYS appear to overlay. And in fact they do at the first level of the hierarchy.
    But when I drill into the hierarchy, the measure column changes, but the scale marker does not.
    Why does this happen?
    It is the exact same column so they should always be the same value. It's a pretty frustrating bug because as you drill, the scale of the measure changes but the scale of marker does not, so it's basically like you're viewing a flat line because the y-axis is too far off from the actual column measure to see any trend.
    Has anyone seen this?

    Thanks for the response, in regards to whether it is 1 or 2 Logical Facts, it is still the same behaviour. IN regards to the Logical Dimension, yes it is set with two LTS with the applicable content levels set. I even tried that as just 1 LTS doing the join through the General tab. Still the same behaviour with the drill-down. I am assuming it will always go through the full drill path regardless of what level the Fact you are hitting is at.

  • Some hierarchy related issues, SQL Query is including unselected columns?

    Hello Guys...
    I have something strange happening in my report.. First of all, the RPD I have is built according to JDE model.
    There is a schema which looks like this:
    BU Dim ------->Fact<---------Account Dim <--------BU Account Dim (Indeed a copy of BU Dim)
    A dim hierarchy is created as AccountDim with Account Desc at the lowest bottom level, the dimension key at that level is AcctID which is the unique identifier.
    The issue comes when I created a report using Account, Account Desc, Fact Measures. The measures are not displayed as per account even if the joins and aggr levels are all defined correctly at the proper level..
    I checked the sql that is generately, it is interested that whenever I include Account Desc column in the report, the SQL will include Actid column in the select and groupby part, which results in data being at the wrong level..
    When I remove Actid from Account Hierarchy as the key, the report runs correctly and the SQL query won't include Actid column.. However, since the removal of the ACTid key from Account Hierarchy will cause other reports not running properly, I have to revert the change back to normal.. I'd like to know what to do in order to investigate more deeply as what's going on and as why the SQL will include columns fields that are not selected at answer levels..
    Any suggestions will be greatly appreciately.. I'd like to provide the rpd file, but not sure how to..
    Many Thanks

    Hi, Vikeng,
    Why use the salary table at all, if you're not ever getting any information from it?
    Why not:
    SELECT  EmpName
    ,      DeptName
    ,      'N/A'          AS SalaryValue
    FROM     Employee
    ,     Department
    WHERE      Employee.EmployeeId     = Department.EmployeeId
    Are you saying that somethimes there is a relationship, but not with this sample data?
    If so, post some different sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) that has a relationship for some rows, and not for others. Post the results you want from that data, and explain, with specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    You might just need an outer join.

  • Hierarchy expand issue after EHP1 upgrade

    Hi,
    We had EHP1 upgrade in our BI system. After upgrade, when we are trying to open the hierarchy of period.
    it should open from TOTAL to Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4. Also when we should try to open Q1 then it should open Jan, Feb and Mar.
    When i am trying to open the Q1, Insted of opening another column for Jan, Feb and Mar. It disappear the Q1 column from WB.
    I tried to execute the query separately and it is working fine. Created a another new WB and it is also working fine.
    Is there any one have such issue then please let me know whould could bea solution or any SAP Note ect?
    Regards
    Pankaj

    Hi Pankaj,
    I have also done the EHP1 upgrade and found the same issue....
    Please run the program SAP_DROP_TMPTABLES and delete the hierarchy temporary tables.....It will definately solve your problem...
    Please let me know in case of further clarifications...
    Thanks,
    Amit Kr.

  • Hierarchy - drill from master to detail

    Hi,
    BOXI 3.1 on RHEL 5 connecting to MySQL 5
    I'm keen to test a hierachial report.
    OUr users want to have a report that displays master or summary info and then they want the ability to srill down and see detailed info associated with that same record.
    Have a look at the link below.
    1st screenshot is how I set up the hierachy - custom hierarchy
    2nd screenshot is of a test report (just 1 record for simplicity)
    I want ot get to the stage where the green fields on the right are hidden when the report is first run and then only by the user either pressing an expand button or drilling in to the individual master record itself can they see these hidden detailed values.
    Any suggestions welcome
    [http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfr8cvrq_184dph4pkgc|http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfr8cvrq_184dph4pkgc]

    Hi Edward,
    Changing the table columns as you drill down is not a supported feature.
    There are a couple of ways around it
    1) Use the DrillFilter function to determine that you are drilling. When not drilling format the extra columns so that they are not visible. Set the text and font coluls the same as the backgroumd
    The use an alter to change the fonts when the drillfilter is set.
    2) Use openDocument with 2 reports. The master report shows a hyperlink which opens the second report.
    Regards
    Alan

  • BPC Alternate hierarchy rollup issue - require help

    Hi All,
    We are seeing a rollup issue on Alternate Hierarchies. We had set-up alternate hierarchies on our Country Dimension (DC) to assist some managerial reporting that is only relevant to one of our Operating segments.
    To show the problem, I am listing an example of our Country dimension member sheet. I have put "**" delimiter between the pertinent values to show which columns the values land under.
    ID*DescriptionPARENTH1PARENTH2FORMULAH1*FORMULAH2
    MAIN_HIER*Main Hier* ** ** ** **
    D1*DC EuropeMAIN_HIER* ** ** **
    A*Country AD1SG1* ** **
    B*Country BD1SG1* ** **
    C*Country CD1SG2* ** **
    D*Country DD1SG3* ** **
    D2--DC India*MAIN_HIER* ** ** **
    E*Country ED2--ALT_HIER* ** **
    C1*Calc Eur* ** *DC.H1.D1+DC.H1.E* **
    ALT_HIER*Alt Hier* ** ** ** **       
    SG1*Sub Reg 1* *ALT_HIER* ** ** 
    SG2*Sub Reg 2* *ALT_HIER* ** **
    SG3*Sub Reg 3* *ALT_HIER* ** **
    We have our main Country hierarchy that comes under the root parent MAIN_HIER. In addition to that on our main hierarchy we had a calculated node for Calc Europe (C1) which is supposed to be a summation of DC Europe (D1) + Country E (E). We had created an alternate hierarchy to represent a breakdown by more subregions (SG1, SG2, SG3 and Country E) within DC Europe so basically the root node of the alternate Hierarchy (ALT_HIER) should show the same amounts as the calculated node C1 on the main hierarchy.
    If we take a higher level Account dimension member like NET_SALES the values tie out but if we take a base member in the Account Hierarchy (e.g one representing Customer Sales), the values don't match with the ALT_HIER values seem being the wrong ones. It almost seems like the rollups of the Alternate Hierarchy are not accurate.
    Could you pls. shed some light on if the dimension member set-up above is wrong from any angle.
    BTW, we are on BPC 7.0M SP04 Patch 2 and SQLServer version is SQLServer 2005 EE SP3.
    Your insights would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Abhay Shanbhag

    Abhay:
    Please try below...
    Add "RollupChildren(Account.Hx.CurrentMember,"+") to all non-base members who don't aggregate properly under FORMULAHx. For instance, I have below hierarchy PARENTH1 for Balance Sheet Total Asset
    BALSHEET
    TotalAsset
    -CurrentAsset
    -NonCurrentAsset
    If CurrentAsset and NonCurrentAsset all roll up fine but TotalAsset doesn't add up. In your Dimension, put MDX formula RollupChildren(Account.H1.CurrentMember,"+") for TotalAsset and BALSHEET under FORMULAH1.
    We have this issue when we created additional hierarchies, and it took us a while to debug before I got this hint from SAP Support. Ever since it works like a charm =)
    Hope this helps
    Brian

  • Drill issue

    Hi everyone,
    In a Heirarchy there are four object 1,2,3,4
    in one of my report i need all the object in the same manner, however in other report i need the object 1,2,3 but not 4 and there should be no sign of drill down to 4 ,  there should only be sign of drill up on object 3, is it possible with the same Heirarchy or i need to create another one
    I'am using BO XI 3.1 SP1 Win XP

    1) Deny your users the right to Extend scope of analysis (THis is an application specific right for the Web Intelliggence application object)
    2) Add to the query editor in report A all 4 objects your hierarchy constists of.
    3) Add to the query editor in report B only 3 objects from your hierarchy.
    In Report A your users can drill along the entire hierarchy path. In Report B they can drill only along the 3 objects.
    Regards,
    Stratos

  • Hierarchy display issue

    Hi folks!,
    we are displaying Funds Centers using a hierarchy. The problem is that if we select Key and Text for display option of Funds Center we get 3 columns on the web (Key, Text, Key). And if we select Text and Key we get only key, so I guess it's a bug. We've seen that the default template has more options about display so we can work around this issue. It's a bit difficult to explain, hope you get the point.
    We are working on BI 7.0 Query designer 7.10 SP  8 Revision 580.
    Thanks!!

    Hi
    May be the master data has only key but no text mainatained.So coudl you please check if both Text and Key is maintained.
    If only Key is mainatained, when the display is Text & Key only the Key will be displayed.
    Regards, Hyma

  • HIERARCHY LOAD ISSUE

    Hi Guys!
    Hey, i have two custom (Z) account characteristics, each one for a diferent company or division in the same BI 7.0 system. the master data for this two companies is in the same R/3 system, so my problem is: i have a hierarchy for each company, so i have to load a hierarchy in each one of my characteristics, but i can't assign a hierarchy datasource for two characteristics (right?) so the question is: is there a way to load two diferent hierarchies in two diferent characteristics in the same R/3 and BI 7.0 system?
    Thanks and Regards.

    Hi,
                We have to load two different hierarchies for two different characteristics.  And we have to use 2 Datasources .......
    I hope this clears your issue.
    Regards,
    Kalyani.

Maybe you are looking for