Calculations in Analyzer

Hi all, I am trying to calculate percentage values in Analyzer. I have 20 rows from Code Dimension (19 Members in the dimension) Now i want to calcualte (row 1, column1) value divided by (row 20, column1) value and put the new value in row1, column2. I want to do the same to all the rows. Is there any way we can achieve this. Any help in this regard will be great. Thanks in advance

That is a problem that has not been solved yet. Here is what Hyperion knowledgebase says about it.Here is the solution: After the value of a substitution variable changes, Hyperion Analyzer calculations using that variable no longer work. Unfortunately, the only workarounds available are:1. Reset the calculation in Analyzer whenever the substitution variables are changed.2. Add the calculation as a Hyperion Essbase member and use that member in the Hyperion Analyzer report. Here is the problem or goal: After the value of a substitution variable changes, Hyperion Analyzer calculations using that variable no longer work. Hyperion Analyzer does not dynamically change after changing a substitution variable. Problem Environment: Hyperion Analyzer 5 Hyperion Wired for OLAP 4 Hyperion Analyzer 6 Causes of this problem: When Hyperion Analyzer saves certain features, such as calculations, it stores the actual member name (value of the variable at the time) instead of the substitution variable.Thus, when a substitution variable is changed, the calculation will no longer function properly.

Similar Messages

For CREATIVE PROGRAMM

I?ve read all posts and the one suggested but I think I know how to make new folder manually.
Ok:
- we can do that manually
- we have already made folders with songs on our hard disk and don?t want to do that again on players
- we know that my playlist in CRATIVE program is ONLY database
- we know that CREATIVE program CANNOT do what we all want it to DO
so CREATIVE programmers why aren?t you doing something to make consumers happier
MY SUGGESTION for famous problem "making folder"
In Pc music library we have column FILE NAME where we can find the path to the song. When we want to transfer songs from library to player ,program takes the last folder in the path and create that folder on the player. When the program comes across to other song with the same folder it won?t make a duplicate it will just copy that song into the already made folder. Is that so hard to make that update so we can use the FAMOUS CREATIVE "Creative MediaSource Organizer" program.
So can we put this on vote !!!!!!

mekon wrote:I was a little bit angry so I am sorry. I was just disappointment so I write that post. I am not any more angry because I realized that "Creative MediaSource Organizer" is nothing more then Windows Explorer with different GUI, with bpm calculator, song analyzer AND built-in player VAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
That is already a lot more than Windows Explorer.
Anyway, if you are talking about Zen series of players, please note that they don't work by folders. That is the nature of the players (firmware/hardware) themselves. It has nothing to do with Creative MediaSource.

Substitution variables in a calculation - Analyzer

I have a report set up in Analyzer and I am using substitution variables. the first column is the current month (&curr_mon) and the secomd column is the prior month (&prior_mon). I want to add a third column that would subtract the first two and give me a variance. but when I add a calculation it doesn't give me the substitution variables to pick from, it gives me the actual value such as 'July'. therefore, the calculation will not dynamically change each month. Any ideas??

Put the variance calc in your outline. We have several such calcs, such as "$ Var to PM" and "% Var to PM", that we update every month in the outline. The only other way to do it is to update your alias to say "Current Month", "Prior Month", etc., so the names remain constant and the calc can be done in Analyzer.

Calculated Keyfigures Fromm Bex Analyzer into BO without Unit

Hi Guys,
We built a Universe on top of Inventory Query from Bex Query Designer. We have lot of Calculated Key figures built on Restricted Keyfigures.
In the Universe some Calculated Keyfigures are shown as folders with Unit value and some of them are not shown in folder and hence it is not bringing the Unit.
If we run the same Query from Bex Analyzer all the Calculated Keyfigures have units associated with them.
Can you please let me know if any of you have the same issue.
Thank you,
PVK

Hello PVK,
I recommend to post this query to the [Integration Kits - SAP|BusinessObjects Integration Kits; forum.
This forum is dedicated to topics related to the BusinessObjects Integration Kit for SAP.
It is monitored by qualified technicians and you will get a faster response there.
Also, all SAP Kit queries remain in one place and thus can be easily searched in one place.
Thanks a lot,
Falk

Analyzer calculation of sum without not available data fields

Hi, I use Hyperion Analyzer 6.1.1.00206. I would like to calculate sum of some members. So I did the following Analysis Tools | Calculations and selected the sum of desired members. But if data field does not have a value (no data = n/a) then sum of members is also n/a (no data)! Is there a way to specify the "not available" is treated as 0? Thanks, Grofaty 

Yes, Click on File, then Preferences then DEFAULT FORMATTING TAB and at the bottom it gives you the option of selecting "REPLACE MISSING DATA WITH" Zero or text. I believe yours is set on text "n/a". Just select "zero" button and click ok. This should solve the problem. Best of luck Benjamin M Hoffmeyer Marketing Analyst SSP CIRCLE K

Analyzer calculations problem

Hi all..I use Analyzer 6.5 and I have create a report with an Essbase database connexion.I have a list of costumer with their account A and B. I want a report having Top 10 costumers, The Total Costumers and the other Costumers (difference between Total and Top10).To do that, in the report, I have generate the Top 10 costumer (with Analayzer Cube Designer options) regarding the Account A. The total A and B of the costumer is known (dynamic calc in the outline). So I have calculated a member "Other Costumer" = "Total Costumers" - "Top 10" in the Analyzer calculation Tool. My problem is that I want to have a ratio C = %(A/B), for each member of my report (Top 10 costumer, "Oher Costumer" and "Total Costumers"). The problem is that C member is correct for the top 10 and for the total costumer. But, for the "Other costumer", the result is C(Other costumer) = C (total costumer) - C(top 10) instead of C (Other costumer) = A (Other costumer)/ B (Other Costumer). Somdebody has a solution to avoid this error ? thanks ...

You can go to Analisys Tools Manager and place the "C" formula below "Other" formula. Analyzer will calculate "Other" first and than "C".Hope it helps

Bex Analyzer Calculation of Results

Hello,
I have created a query using Bex Analyzer. In the query I am also using a formula to calculate forecast accuracy. When I execute the query the formula works fine in the rows.
The problem is the (yellow) overall result row. Here the result is not correct because it is supposed to be calculated differently. In the query properties the settings for "Calculate result as.." are limited and do not serve my purpose.
Is there a way (workaround) to calculate the result in the overall result row differently, maybe using VBA (does anyone have sample code in this case) or is there any other option?
Thank you very much for your help.
Christian

Hi Heike,
First of all thank you very much.
When I use "leaf(xyz)yourformulaforsinglevalues + not leaf(xyz) yourforumulaforresultrows" what should I include in the brackets where you mention (xyz)?
Does this "leaf-function" work for all drilldown levels, meaning I define the formula using the formula editor, execute the query and make a drilldown according to another characteristic and have the correct result for the single values and the result rows at that level of detail too.
Thank you very much for your help again. I really appreciate that.
Christian

Portfolio Analyzer - Calculation of TWRR

Hi,
I have a Commercial paper for USD 2Million with a interest rate of 9% invested on Jan 1, 2010 and maturing on Feb 7, 2010.. I ran PAEP1 PAEP2 transactions which calculated all the key figures (including Time weighted Rate of Return - TWRR). When I run the AIS_STDREP report, it shows that the TWRR is -59.98667.
My question is:
1. The TWRR should be in the viscinity of 9%, why is the system showing such a huge figure of -59.98667?
2. Why is this figure negative?
3. In the Results database table RDBPA_NSUM_GEN the TWRR calculated is -5.998667, but in the AIS_STDREP report is showing it as 10 times that value.
I would appreciate if anyone can explain how the TWRR is calculated and if there is any OSS note which explains this.
I know the formula for calcualtion of TWRR as given in SAP documentation in Help.sap.com, but I want to know how it is actually calculated. In the above example, there are only two cash flows. The initial discounted amount 1,981,669.56, when the investment is made and the final repayment of 2,000,000 at the end of the period. Typically the formula is Nominal value at the end of the period divided by Nominal value at the beginning of the period, in which case it should return 9% as the TWRR. Is my understanding correct? Or is the system using the LIBOR rate (attached to the yield curve given in the Evaluation type) to calculate the TWRR?
In the Evalaution type p Portflio analyzer TAB, I have selected 'Nominal Value' out of the three choices given in that (Nominal value, Nominal value plus interest receivable and NPV(default). Is this correct?
I saw in another thread, Vinodh mentioned that we should use 'Calculate Theoretical price' in the 'Evaluation Control' TAB. . But since I am not using the Valuation Rule, this option is not available in the General Information' of the Evaluation type.
I would appreciate any help in this matter.
Thanks
Kalyan.

Hi Kaylan,
perhaps documentation giving formula under the following link can help you check how TWRR calculates: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/01/84a642fafec611e10000000a1550b0/content.htm.
Hence, simplified, the calculation for TWRR should look like (( PAPOSCC(i) - 2,000,000 ) / PAPOSCC(i-1) - 1) * 100.
The result is probably shown in scientific notation, i.e. like -5.998667E+01, so this should correspond to-59.98667.
BR,
Tomislav

BW ERROR while calculating local formula in Bex analyzer

Hi gurus,
Their is an error comming up on a report which is opened in Bex Analyzer. When we create local formula i encounter this error.
It says"
"Program error in class SAPMYSS1S method :uncaught exception "
"System error in program SAPLRRK0 and form DELETE_FST-01"
Not sure of why this error is comming up.
DO we need to update a OSS note for this.
Please suggest .
Regards,
Balaji Raj

Search SCN & Marketplace.

Calculating analyze times

Does anyone know if there is an acurate way to calculate anaylzing times from the smooth cam node? Obviously, I could just analyze a clip, see how long it takes, and go from there, but because I have numerous HD clips that about about 12-13 seconds long but are about 2 gigs a piece, I was wondering if anyone knew of a way?

Only the one you've already described...
Patrick

Problem with Calculations created in Analyzer Views

Hi,I have to create a view looks as follows Y2001 5000 Act Bud Variance=================================================Sales 200 100 100(Act-Bud)Margin 300 400 -100(Act-Bud)Expense 500 600 100(Bud-Act)Here i am bring row names from one dimension andAct and Bud members from scenarion dimension. I created a calculation field i.e "variance" on screnario dimension.Is there any way to create this variance field as shown above. While calculating for sales and Margin rows i want to use "Act" - "Bud" and for Expense i want to use "Bud" - "Act".This is very much important from business perespective. Did anybody got this type of problem?.Do you have any suggestion?.I would appreciate any help given or any suggestions.Thanks a lot in advance..Regards..Rao

The easiest way to solve this is to add a dynamic calc member in the Essbase outline for the variance calculation. You need to use the @var function and set Expense reporting tag for all expense accounts in the outline.-Magnus---Message Posted by meetrao 3/29/02 07:41---Hi,I have to create a view looks as follows Y2001 5000 Act Bud Variance=================================================Sales 200 100 100(Act-Bud)Margin 300 400 -100(Act-Bud)Expense 500 600 100(Bud-Act)Here i am bring row names from one dimension andAct and Bud members from scenarion dimension. I created a calculation field i.e "variance" on screnario dimension.Is there any way to create this variance field as shown above. While calculating for sales and Margin rows i want to use "Act" - "Bud" and for Expense i want to use "Bud" - "Act".This is very much important from business perespective. Did anybody got this type of problem?.Do you have any suggestion?.I would appreciate any help given or any suggestions.Thanks a lot in advance..Regards..Rao

Analyzer 611 Calculation ISSUE

Hi,I have the following table:-------------------------------------- |jan|feb|mar|apr| AVG | SUM--------------------------------------Real |10 |15 |n/a|10 | n/a | n/a --------------------------------------LastYear |15 |15 |15 |15 | 15 | 60--------------------------------------I inserted 2 calculations (AVERAGE and SUM) based on all members. When i've got cells with nothing in it (n/a or -) the result obtained is n/a or - !!!!!!!! Did you had similar results? Is it because i'm working with essbase v6.1 (instead of 6.1 or higher)?Thanx for your helpSeb

This is a known issue with Hyperion. (I don't have the bug number, however.) As a workaround, I found that suppressing missing rows or changing missing values to 0 gets the calculations to compute.

G/L account interest calculation

Hello Experts,
I have an issue with F.52 interest calculation; we have calculating interest for the period 01.07.2011 to 31.07.2011. However, calculation went fine for all G/L account except two G/L account which has calculating interest for earlier periods also.
We analyze the issue and found out a one possibility, because of field u201CDate of Last Interest Runu201D however this field applies only when there is posting to G/L account with earlier date for which interest already been calculated. I have seen the documents which were wrongly picked in the interest run, and entry date is in earlier monthly only.
I do not understand why these two G/L accounts is picking the documents in the earlier periods to calculate the interest for the period 01.07.2011 to 31.07.2011.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
MM

Hello Mauri,
Thank you very much for your reply.
First of all we are not using the G/L updation through this program.
I have an issue with only for the period 01.07.2011 and 31.07.2011 for two G/L account, and calculation is asolutely fine for all the earlier periods and even for next period 01.08.2011 ot 31.08.2011.
As per my understanding u201CDate of Last Interest Runu201D, applies only when there is posting to the G/L account with earlier date for which interest already been calculated.
If I keep the Date of Last Interest Run field blank, it calculate interest only for the period 01.01.2011 to 31.07.2011, however I can.t propose this solution because in all earlier periods they executed F.52 transaction with similar input parameter and calculation is absolutely fine.
Please let me know your view.
Regards,
MM

Error in the Harmonic Distortion Analyzer VI?

Hello
Today I tried to use the harmonics distortion analyzer VI and it seems that there is an error in the VI (or I misunderstood something...).
The phenomenon I observed can very well be shown in the attached example.
Description:
- THD - calc: output for the THD calculated by hand with the amplitudes (in this example: THD = sqrt(2^2+3^2)/4 = 0.901)
- THD - VI: output calculated by the Harmonic Distortion Analyzer VI
Both results are identical if the number of analyzed periods is >= 3 (# periods = # samples*fundamental frequency / Fs). If only 1 or 2 periods are analyzed, the Harmonic Distortion Analyzer VI gives a wrong result.
What is the mistake? Did I do any wrong settings or is it a problem with the VI?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Best regards,
Stefan
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
HarmonicsAnalizer_Example.vi ‏32 KB

If you open the block diagram of the Harmonic Distortion Analyzer VI, you will see that it uses Fourier transform techniques to calculate THD. FFTs do not work well with small numbers of cycles and can have large errors when fractional cycles are involved.
In the VI you posted increasing the number of samples to 300 produces identical results to 5 significant figures. At 200 samples the error is about 10%.
When working with FFT based analysis tools, use lots of cycles.
Lynn

Metrics - How they are defined / calculated ?

My customer is analyzing a couple of standard reports. They are asking for the definition or calculation for some metrics like:
a) In the Active Campaign status report
ROI - Return over investment
Cost per closed sale
Cost per leadb) In the Team Sales Effectiveness Analysis report
Average business volume
Success RatePls. is there a way / document that has this information ?
I know that these are in the 'model' or 'OBI repository used' but I dont think we have access to this model.
Txs.
Antonio

ISA and GS values are inserted from party configuration.
If you had schema deployed, EDI sendpipeline will resolve the parties depending upon message type of outgoing message which is Targetnamespace#Rootnode.
In your first case you might have added send port inside agreement.
For Dynamic Send port, please read below:
A dynamic send port enables you to send an interchange to any one of multiple destinations, because it resolves the agreement and determines the destination address based upon the value in the
DestinationPartyName context property.
Note
If you are sending an EDI interchange that is based upon an XML message received, and you are using a passthrough receive pipeline to receive that application, you will have to promote the DestinationPartyName context property. For more information, see Agreement
Resolution and Schema Determination for Outgoing EDI Messages.

Calculations in Analyzer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for