Can we write Substitution rule during payment document creation

Hi,
I have to subsitute a value in a field during f110, is it possible ??

Thanks for the reply.
I tried this logic in GGB1.
SYST-TCODE = 'f110' AND BSEG-DMBTR >= '100000'
Substitute Payment method supplement with a constant value = 15
but this is not working.....Actually i need to get the second signature manually on the check amount greater than 100000. so i am using payment method supplement to sort high amount checks.
this logic is working when i am using rule during invoice processing...but not working during f110.
please advice.
Thanks
Riya

Similar Messages

Substitution Rule for Payment Term

Hi Expert,
I have to have Substitution for payment term the following criteria:
Company Code = '1000' AND Document Type = 'L1' AND Posting key = '14', then ... substitution bseg-zterm with certain payment term.
Problem: there is no substitution for bseg-zterm.
I read the post at http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/substitution-rule-for-payment-term-489202
and found that I need to apply a SAP note 42615 in order to enable the BSEG-ZTERM field in Substitution Rule for Payment Term, and after that run Program RGUGBR00 to regenerate the substitution.
But, problem again, our SAP is ECC 6.0, and the said SAP note is not applicable.
Kindly advise is there any other way that I can enable the bseg-zterm field at substituion.
Thanks,
sbmel

Hi
1. Go to SE16N and enter Table GB01
2. Enter &SAP_EDIT in the command prompt i..e the space where you type your T code and press enter
3. BCL TAB = BSEG and Field = ZTERM... Execute
4. Remove the X for the field BEXCLUDE.. SAVE....
5. Select this entry and menu Table > Transport > Include in tr request
6. Run RGUGBR00
Br, Ajay M

Mavericks 10.9.3. Can I write a Rule in the Mail app and tell the rule to return an email to the sender? I have already trsuggestions?

Mavericks 10.9.3. MacBook. Can I write a Rule in the Mail app to return an email to Sender? I have tried many, many times but no luck so far. Is it even possible, or am I wasting my time?

There is no specific option to do that, although you can redirect a message if it meets certain criteria. I believe if you wanted to bounce it back to the sender, then you would need an AppleScript to run. If you do some Google or MacUpdate searching you may find an existing script for this purpose.

FI Substitution rule on completed document

Hi Everyone,
We're trying to create a substitution rule to change the payment terms on our invoices (fields BSEG-ZTERM and BSEG-ZBD1T). We're having trouble with our prerequisite: If any of the expense distributions are being charged against a federal grant (BSEG-GRANT_NBR) then call the substitution rule. We want our exit to loop through all distribution lines and if it finds any being charged to a grant it should set the condition to true and substitute...if it doesn't find any it should be set to false.
We've done all of the necessary steps:
-Activated the fields on GB01
-Defined the substitution rules on OBBH
-Build and compiled the user exit.
Problem we're having is that when there are multiple lines it only seems to be reading the last line item to make the determination.
Example 1:
Line 1 Grant
Line 2 No Grant
Result is that payment terms are not substituted. It should be substituted because line 1 hit a grant.
Example 2:
Line 1 No Grant
Line 2 Grant
Result is that payment terms are substituted correctly.
My ABAPer says that the problem seems to be that on the completed document he can only see the last line (not all the lines)....does anyone know a way to loop through all the records on a completed document? It seems that substitution gets called before records get inserted into the database so we're not sure how to make our pre-requisite work.
thanks for your help

Hi,
here is the solution.
Create your user exit.
FORM u280 USING bool_data TYPE gb002_015.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <ls_bseg> LIKE LINE OF bool_data-bseg,
LOOP AT bool_data-bseg ASSIGNING <ls_bseg>.
* Here is your logic needed
ENDLOOP.
Create a substitution for the complete document in GGB1 and choose no field but "Only exit'.

Substitution rule - During Stock Transfer Order

Hello Experts,
We are transferring stock from one plant to another plant. Each plant is business area. We are doing stock transfer at some profit element of Rs. 250. Transfer is done from Business Area D002 to Business Area D001.
When we do outbound delivery, it posts following entry:
Stock A/c... Dr (Business Area D001) Rs.1250
To Stock A/c (Business Area D002) Rs.1000
To Profit on transfer (Business Area D001) Rs.250
However, I want to substitute business area for third line. I want that, business area D001 should be replaced with business area D002. However, there is some substitution rule for the same. Please tell me, how this substitution can be done.
Please help
Deepak

Hi,
What is the already existing substitution ?
You can write prerequisite Using sets , if both the rules needs to used..

Output determination does not happen during Sales Document creation

Hello All,
I am facing an issue where the automatic output determination does not happen when the Sales Order is created. Let me explain a bit on the background.
Output type ZDL2 has been defined as a special function (TNAPR-NACHA = 8) attached to a custom program and Form routine to create Outbound delivery after successful posting of the sales order.
Condition records are maintained to trigger this output for the Key Combination of Sales Org/Distrib Channel/Division/Route. Access sequence has also been correctly maintained for the above fields.
When the Sales order is saved, the output is supposed to be triggered but out of several sales orders created, it triggered for just one document. We have no clues on what could be the issue.
One question here is, can we have the access sequence maintained for the fields from both header and item level (ie KOMKBV1 and KOMPBV1). Please be reminded that, in our case, the field ROUTE comes from the field catalog KOMPBV1.
Another point which we noticed is that, the Function Module COMMUNICATION_AREA_KOMPBV1 which is supposed to fill the Item data Communication structure for output determination was never called.
Has anyone came across such situations. Comments or suggestions are really appreciated.
Kind Regards
Sabu Kuriakose

Sabu Kuriakose,
Since you are using ROUTE as one parameter for the condition table, and it is at the item level.
the output is triggered at the header level.
So a sales order can contain multiple items with different routes. so at header level how will u identify the route ?
the fields might be available for creatign the condition table but the problem is the fields should get the value during order processing.
in the analsysis screen you will know that the field is getting the value of the ROUTE or not ?
also for creating a delivery you need a shipping point. same as above you can hae multiple items with different shipping points. how will u consider that scenario.
If you can explain that, then that will be helpful to answer your problem.

Change in Qty during billing document creation

Hi,
I have create a sales order for an single item with 100 qtys. I have then delivered the entire quantity and had done the PGI. Now during creation of the billing document, I want to bill only 50 nos. Request you all to please guide how it can be done??
Regards,
Ritam

>
Ritam Bera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have create a sales order for an single item with 100 qtys. I have then delivered the entire quantity and had done the PGI. Now during creation of the billing document, I want to bill only 50 nos. Request you all to please guide how it can be done??
>
> Regards,
> Ritam
Hi Ritam,
If you are creating the billing document with reference to the delivery then goto the T.Code "VTFL".
Select your document type(Billing as well as delivery).Goto Item and select the Item category and then Click on details and in the screen select pos/neg. quantity as "+" then it will allow you to enter partial quantity.
If you are creating with reference to sala order then goto T.Code "VTFA" and repeat the same as above.
Regards,
Mohan.

How to use Material Group in substitution rule

Hello,
Anyone experience in how to use the entry of the material group of a PO, in a substitution rule for accounting documents.
I have noticed the material number can be used within a substitution rule, and is also available in BSEG... so far have not find a solution to do this for a material group.
Please note, this is applicable for PO with no materials (ONLY a material group to use for account determination).
Many thanks,
Daan

forget about all varible in essbase CSC
it's bad practics.^^^Is it?
Essbase cube are self big array )^^^That's what makes ARRAY so cool -- you can set up an array that encompasses a dimension.
Example straight from a HBR:
ARRAY SomeArray["Entity"] ;
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Substitution Rule for F110

Hi gurus,
Currently, my substitution rule for tcode 'F110', is not triggered. Because I need to change the value of BSEG-AUFNR (Order Number) to blank after F110. Can you tell me if there's a workaround?
Thanks gurus.

Hi,
Can you please elaborate your scenario. As per my knowledge you can not edit already posted document by using substitution rule.
Once document is posted substitution is triggered and change that particular documnet, it will not go to any other document whcih is posted earlier and make any changes.
You can very well go and repost the document or change the document if it is possible.
Regards,
Anand Raichura

Payment Document in F110

dear all expert,
i run F110, but when payment run no payment document display for that transaction..can anybody tell me how to show that payment document in Payment proposal? cause i want to update text field in payment document to input check number?

Hi,
In payment proposal, the payment document number does not come.
Payment document number comes, only when you have done payment run. (You can see that payment list from F110 > Edit > Payment Run > Payment List.)
You can get the list of the payment documents from there or from table REGUH in transaction SE16N and can update the value via transaction FB02/ FB09
Regards,
SDNer

BPM and Substitution rule (Delegate mechanism)

can we create substitution rule (Delegate mechanism )using BPM

Hi,
I have one scenario..!
If the user is on leave and and he is not submitting his task for more than 3 days automatically BPM has to redirect that task to another user with out any human involvement. Is it possible?? If so with what version.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Krishnam

How ti write BRF+ rule for multiple outputs?

1.I have to get 3 outputs in ruleset.
2.Created one descion table and displayed 3 outputs.
3.For Function binded one table with 3 out puts.
4.I have to pass values from descion tbale to function output through rule set?
How can i write the rule?

i CREATED NEW APPLICATION AND TRY TO CREATE NEW RULE.
ITS SHOWING SAME ERROR.
AOA (Data Object) : Multiple use of identical objects (AOA and STAMP_DUTY_TABLE-SD_STRUCTURE-AOA) in sets context/temporary ruleset variable not allowed (Detail) Display Help
FORM2_2 (Data Object) : Multiple use of identical objects (FORM2_2 and STAMP_DUTY_TABLE-SD_STRUCTURE-FORM2_2) in sets context/temporary ruleset variable not allowed (Detail) Display Help
MOA (Data Object) : Multiple use of identical objects (MOA and STAMP_DUTY_TABLE-SD_STRUCTURE-MOA) in sets context/temporary ruleset variable not allowed (Detail) Display Help

Creating multiple categories instance on document creation

Im trying to create a document with multiple categories instance on it .
It seems it only takes the last CATEGORY_DEFINITION passed to creation call.
NamedValue[] attrNV1 = new NamedValue[2];
attrNV1[0] = new NamedValue( "CUSTOM_82413", "Ma valeur1");
attrNV1[1] = new NamedValue( "CUSTOM_82800", "Ma valeur3");
NamedValue[] catDef1 = new NamedValue[2];
catDef1[0] = new NamedValue( Options.CATEGORY_CLASS_ID, new Long( 82414 ));
catDef1[1] = new NamedValue( Options.CATEGORY_DEFINITION_ATTRIBUTES, attrNV1 );
fileMeta[ 3 ] = new NamedValue( Options.CATEGORY_DEFINITION, catDef1 );
NamedValue[] attrNV2 = new NamedValue[1];
attrNV2[0] = new NamedValue( "CUSTOM_82789", "Ma valeur2");
NamedValue[] catDef2 = new NamedValue[2];
catDef2[0] = new NamedValue( Options.CATEGORY_CLASS_ID, new Long( 82790) );
catDef2[1] = new NamedValue( Options.CATEGORY_DEFINITION_ATTRIBUTES, attrNV2 );
fileMeta[ 4 ] = new NamedValue( Options.CATEGORY_DEFINITION, catDef2 );
Item doc = fileM.createDocument(fileMeta, null, null);
Only last CATEGORY_DEFINITION is created.
Is this normal behavior or can I create multiple category instance at document creation?

I dont know why this is not working. I think It might be a bug.
you can create multiple category instances using fileM.updateDocument()

PO down payment is not picking FI substitution rule.

Hi All,
We have an issue with PO down payment and clearing. We have a
substitution rule on line item level as per company code were default profit
center is set. But while doing ME2DP, profit center is picking from PO account
assignment and overriding our substitution rule. We did try with complete
document substitution rule also but not worked.
Clearing of the pre-payment is deriving the profit center of
the account assignment on the PO, overriding our profit center substitution.
This is only happening with PO down payment. Please let me
know any solution.

Hi Rakesh
If the Down payment GL you are referring to is a Balance sheet account, your substitution should work.. How have you written your substitution? Can you give a screen shot?
But if you are referring to the Down Payment Cost Element assigned against your Controlling area, system is correct... For a cost element, PC is always derived from the associated CO object
br, Ajay M

Payment Block in Substitution Rule

I' created a Substitution rule to block particular vendor invoices at callup point 2 when they are entered in the system. At some point in time, I need to unblock these vendor invoices in order to make a payment. When I unblock the invoices, my substitution rule keeps blocking the invoices again. What do I need to do to only have my Substitution Rule work at the time of invoice entry?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

OK I am not sure your processes you currently use.
Do you use MIRO or FB60.
You could JUST add the tcode to your rule if you new the tcodes you used to create the vendor postings.
Please consider Vendor credits as well, do they block as standard?
Anyway I guess you have a rule that says something like if doc type is "KR" then add a payment block. What you need to do now if you know ALL of your doc types is say, if the doc type is "KR" and the tcode is "MIRO, FB60" then add payment block.
That way when you go to change the payment block in FB02 you can save it correctly.
Please assign points if this is useful.

Can we write Substitution rule during payment document creation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for