Cannot remove misstyped static route

I have misstyped a static route (netmask is wrong) and cannot delete:
gw-kuvasz#sh run | include route
route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110 1
If I try to remove get the following error message:
gw-kuvasz(config)# no route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110
ERROR: Invalid network address 0.246.102.79, cannot add route
What to do?
Thank for the help: Joseph

Hi,
Seems both the network address and mask are wrong.
There are not that many commands related to routes you can use
This seems like some bug. I dont know why it is giving a message of adding a route when you are removing one.
I tried this with my home ASA5505 (8.4(5)) and it wont let me even add that route to begin with.
One command you could try (risks involed) is to remove all the routes regarding "alba-dmz" interface on the ASA. This command doesnt specify the exact route to be removed but rather removes all static routes from that interface so it has its own risks.
ASA(config)# clear configure route alba-dmz
Depending on your network setup you might want to do this outside normal working hours since you need to remove all routes from that interface. I am not sure if it will work.
One idea is naturally booting up the ASA if you havent saved the configuration
Or perhaps trying to boot the ASA with a configuration file that doesnt include the route
- Jouni

Similar Messages

Cannot add static routes wrt350n

Router has latest firmware and was just set to default values. I cannot add a static route, says "static route invalid" no matter what address I input (keeping it simple, trying 192.168.1.XXX)
I have never had this problem with any other router and I'm thinking it's broken. Thought I'd ask here to make sure I wasn't missing a setting before I throw this thing out the window.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks, Nick.

Thanks for the help, it is appreciated...
I would like to use a static IP address for my LAN multimedia server, MythTV reccommends a static address for the backend server. I have also always used Static IP addresses for my LAN.
I am a little confused, and my networking is very rusty so please bear with me. Perhaps I have not provided enough information, because I do not fully understand your response. I don't understand how subnetting is relevant.
My network is a simple home network, with one router separating my LAN from the cloud. I have one LAN, no subnetting, 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0.
Every home router I have used before I have set up the LAN portion like this... And it has always worked in the past...
gateway: 192.168.1.1/24.
static routes 192.168.1.(2-5)/24 for my stationary hosts.
dhcp range 192.168.1.(10-15)/24 for laptops and guests.
In response:
1) Yes it is LAN traffic, but the hosts still need addresses, right? Not sure what you're getting at here.
2) Not sure what you mean... example host 192.168.1.20/24, and the router 192.168.1.1/24are both within the 192.168.1.0/24 network, right? So requests from the cloud are broadcast to all in my LAN, right? How is this relevant?
3) I thought the gateway (on my only router) has to be part of the LAN addressing. By Linksys/Cisco default, the router LAN side gateway is 192.168.1.1/24 and it sends out dhcp addresses to 192.168.1.(100-149)/24.
Am I severly confused or are we just on the wrong page?

Static routes within VRF

Is there a limit to the number of static route one could use within a VRF ?
We have a large customer connected to MPLS VRF based backbone and due to various limiting factors this customer uses static routing from a PE-CE perspective.
We have been experiencing a problem where a static needsto be removed and placed back as routing to a site stops (No traffic passed) , this happes intermittently and to different sites within diffrent regions as well. All the general or expected troubleshooting procedures have been followed i.e. Check routing table , bgp , CEF tables , FIB etc. All seems fine , the only thing that reloves this is removing the static and then replacing it.
My thinking is that there might be a limit to the number of static's that one can use within a VRF and that we have reached the limit for this customer , which causes the intermittent failure.
Please advise.

I know of a "maximum routes limit " command to limit the number of routes in a Vrf on a PE.
From this command reference i find there are no default values for this.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fswtch_r/xrfscmd3.htm#1032272
So I assume, the default is to allow a huge value and the only limitations would be the memory/capacity and the number of vrfs on the PE router.
If you are experiencing a problem in this regard and removing a static route is helping to overcome it, then I would only suspect a bug here.
I am also curious to know how may many static routes you have in this particular vrf.

Static Routing vs. Access Point

I need helping in setting up my media center. I have the Dlink 520 in wireless mode. I have the linksys WRT300N. And I'd like to set up a static route to my wired network's resources. This device is hardcoded with 192.168.1.X and I need a static route to the 192.168.0.X network. Is there a way to do so, so that my media server will be seen by the server on that network. Please help.. I've looked at port forwarding and DMZ and they all have a hardcoded 192.168.1.X. Should I just set this device up as a access point, even though I have other wireless devices that benefit from DHCP. Please advise.
Thank you
Mr V.

If you connect the WRT in gateway mode through its internet port to the dlink, you don't have to define any static route on the WRT. The LAN behind the WRT is inaccessible then unless you define port forwardings on the WRT.
If you connect the WRT in router mode through its internet port to the netgear you also don't have to define a static route on the WRT. You must define a static route for the WRT subnet on the dlink. The WRT will just work correctly as it is. You may also have to define a static route on the dlink to forward packets for the WRT subnet to the WRT instead of the netgear.
If you setup the WRT as I have suggested you don't need static routes on the WRT either because the internet port is not used and thus there is no routing on the WRT.
So, whatever you want to do I cannot see any reason in your setup why you think you would have to set a static route on the WRT. You only need routing if the packets have to go one more hop. But the WRT has only two sides and those two sides are your complete LAN. There is nothing else there...
You cannot define a static route for the traffic from inside the WRT LAN to the outside simply because this is implicitly defined with the configuration of the internet and LAN interfaces.
I don't have another suggestion. I think I have listed the major reason why it is beneficial to set up the WRT as access point, mostly because you'll only have a single LAN subnet instead of two. Two subnets complicate many things. One of those things is file sharing across the router which may be related to your problems.
I suggest you try to set it up as I have suggested and we see how it goes...

Error when attempting to remove static route from ASA 5525x running version 9.0(4)

Hello,
I am having difficulty in removing static routes from my ASA5525x, hoping someone here may be able to help.
Example:
ASA5525X/pri/act# sh route | in 192.168
S 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 64.57.xxx.xx, OUTSIDE
ATLCOLO-ASA5525X/pri/act(config)# no route OUTSIDE 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 64.57.xxx.xx
%No matching route to delete
There are several which need to be removed, all 192.168.x.x/24, pointing to the Outside interface using the same address 64.57.xxx.xx

Hi,
I think i agree with Jon that this is probably due to RRI from the VPN configuration.
Also , check this output:-
show asp table routing and see if you see it in here as well.
We also have some defects so please provide the relevant interface and routing configuration and also the ASA code version.
Thanks and Regards,
Vibhor Amrodia

Adding Static Routes for VLANS

We have 3 servers each in a different vlan and 1 server is a Bordermanager.
We added network routes to 2 server and all the vlans can see them, the
Bordermanager already has a default route that takes it out on the
internet, when we try to add a private network number of the vlans, it does
not see the other vlans. What is the correct way to do this or is there?
Thank you...

Ok Craig,
There are only 2 vlans, VLAN1 has all the servers, VLAN2 has all the users,
a Cisco router supposedly does the routing between both VLANS because the
router protocol supports ISL. Rip has been removed from the servers. The
Bordermanager Server is in VLAN1, the problem is that all the servers you
can change the Static Route to the VLAN2 that has all the users, but the
Border cannot because it's static route goes out to the internet and it
doesn't let you make a change, would a 3 card in the Border help? Thanxs...
> In article <Mfc4e.1881$[email protected]>, wrote:
> > when we try to add a private network number of the vlans, it does
> > not see the other vlans. What is the correct way to do this or is there?
> >
> Can you give more details?
>
> Somewhere there has to be a router that contains all of the VLANS in order
> to route between them. (Or a pair of routers each with 2 of the VLANS).
> This could be a server or a routing module in your VLAN box.
>
> The BMgr server would need a static route pointing to the router(s)
> connecting the VLANS.
>
> Craig Johnson
> Novell Support Connection SysOp
> *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
> BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***
>

Default static route and Null 0

Hi Everyone,
Need to clear some doubts for below setup
Switch 3550A is connected to Internet Router and has OSPF nei relationship with it.
3550A#                      sh run int fa0/11
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 272 bytes
interface FastEthernet0/11
description OSPF LAN Connection to 2691 Router Interface Fas 0/1
no switchport
ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.254
sh ip route shows
3550A#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.5.3 to network 0.0.0.0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:39:56, FastEthernet0/11
3550A#
All is working fine.
For testing purposes i config below static route on 3550A
ip default-network 192.168.1.0
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
After above change
3550A#           sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
S*   192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Null0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:38:38, FastEthernet0/11
Now i can not ping to internet as below
3550A#ping 4.2.2.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
So in this case Switch is using which IP as source?
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
Extended ping works fine as below
3550A#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 4.2.2.2
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: 192.168.5.2
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.5.2
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/80 ms
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
Regards
MAhesh

Hi Mahesh,
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
That is correct. By default it is always the outgoing interface on the device unless you specify it differently.
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
That is correct. Null0 can't be used as next-hop.
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
No, that is because 192.168.5.0/30 is NATed. Remember 192.168.x.x address is a private segment and cannot access the Internet unless NAT is used.
HTH
Reza

In A Perfect World - Using Static Routes In RRAS 2012 To Traverse Sites

I have site-to-site VPN tunnels between my main sites
NYC <--> UK
NYC <----> SANFRAN
NYC <----> BOSTON
NYC <----> MALTA
UK <----> SANFRAN
UK <----> BOSTON
And could see ALL sites when I had my DA/RRAS server using one of the existing subnets (for example, when I used US VPN on NYC DHCP (192.168.2.x) I was able to see EVERYTHING on any site we had a site-to-site VPN with (i.e. from VPN client I could access
MALTA, UK, SANFRAN, BOSTON).
Alas I had to change that to a different subnet (192.168.145.x) and now only see the 192.168.2.x network in NYC.
Is there a way to add static routes on the NYC & UK DA/RRAS servers so this access is restored? Or would this be solved at the Layer 2/3 network level?
Michael P. O'Hara

No, you need to allow forwarding of broadcast packet, but it's really against the best-practice, as you can kill easilly your satellite link.
I agree with you for wins, as I personnaly does not use it and try to remove it when I see someone use it, but it's the only solution for what you want (network discovery over LAN). (even LLTD is not routable beyond router)
Editted: You need to see all machines, but does the enduser must see them ?
Regards, Philippe
Don't forget to mark as answer or vote as
helpful to help identify good information. ( linkedin endorsement never hurt too :o) )
Answer an interesting question ? Create a
wiki article about it!

Static routes

Hi all, if I had 4 ip subnets with 4 dsl routes on those subnets, and a router in the middle of them all which has interfaces in each subnet, If I point a route say 10/8 to each dsl router, will it load balance by the same ip source address it came from ?

1. A router always has at least two IP addresses. Otherwise it cannot route traffic. Your E2000 has LAN IP address 10.10.100.1/255.255.255.0 and has a 192.168.0.*/255.255.255.0 address from your main router on the WAN port. Each IP address results in an automatic route entry for the corresponding network, thus you see the 10.10.100.0/255.255.255.0 route for the LAN side and the 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 route for the WAN side. The default gateway is the IP address of your main router, i.e. all other IP addresses are sent to the default gateway IP address on the WAN side.
2. I don't understand why you want to add a static route here. Your E2000 has all the routes it needs.
3. 192.168.0.1 is an IP address not a network. A network always consists of a network (IP) address and a subnet mask. 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 is a network.
4. A static route for 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0 with gateway 10.10.100.1 doesn't make any sense on your E2000. 10.10.100.1 is the LAN IP address of the E2000. That means you tell the E2000 to route packets for the network 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 to itself. The gateway IP address must always be the IP address of the next hop on the way to the destination. It can never be itself.
(Sidenote: Technically, some operating systems show the own IP address as gateway when the network is directly connected, i.e. the packet is not routed but delivered directly to the recipient. In that case you would see the own IP address instead of 0.0.0.0 in the gateway column. But that's another representation in the routing table to tell the system that this network is delivered by other means than IP routing, i.e. usually delivered directly through the ethernet LAN network).

RV180 Router: Cannot get Inter-VLAN Routing to work.

I have been banging at this now for two days and just cannot get Inter-VLAN routing working to work on this router.
Here is the est-up:.
Upgraded to latest Cisco firmware (1.0.1.9).
Starting with factory default settings, I added 2 VLANS as follows:
    vlan default(id=1): dhcpmode=server IP=192.168.1.1/24 port 1
    vlan vlan2 (id=2): dhcpmode=server IP=192.168.2.1/24 port 2
    vlan vlan3 (id=3): dhcpmode=server IP=192.168.3.1/24 port 3
                                   (unconnected)
                                     WAN port
                                        |
                                    Routing/NAT
                                        |
vlan ip                   192.168.1.1   192.168.2.1   192.168.3.1
vlan name                   default        vlan2        vlan3
vlan id                       ID=1          ID=2         ID=3
Inter-VLAN Routing             No           Yes          Yes
Port 1                     Untagged       Excluded     Excluded
Port 2                     Excluded       Untagged     Excluded
Port 3                     Excluded       Excluded     Untagged
Port 4(not of interest)    Untagged       Excluded     Excluded
                            Port 1         Port 2       Port 3
                              |              |            |
                           AdminPC          PC2          PC3
                                       192.168.2.191   192.168.3.181
PC2 gets assigned an IP Address of 192.168.2.191 (DGW=192.168.2.1) - OK
PC3 gets assigned an IP Address of 192.168.3.181 (DGW=192.168.3.1) - OK
PC2 with (IP 192.168.2.191) can ping 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 - OK
PC3 with (IP 192.168.3.181) can ping 192.168.3.1 and 192.168.2.1 - OK
BUT....
PC2 cannot ping PC3 - NOT WORKING
PC3 cannot ping PC2 - NOT WORKING
(does not work in both Gateway Mode and Router Mode)
ANYONE CAN HELP ME FIGURE OUT WHY ??????
Your help is much appreciated.
I bought this device specifically because it supported inter-VLAN routing!.
Venu
Supporting Information:
Screen captures:
VLAN Membership:
VLAN ID Description Inter VLAN Device   Port 1    Port 2    Port 3    Port 4
                        Routing     Mgment
       1   Default      Disabled    Enabled Untagged Excluded Excluded Untagged
       2   VLAN2        Enabled     Enabled Excluded Untagged Excluded Excluded
       3   VLAN3        Enabled     Enabled Excluded Excluded Untagged Excluded
Multiple VLAN Subnets:
   VLAN ID IP Address   Subnet Mask    DHCP Mode    DNS Proxy Status
        1 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server Enabled
        2 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server Enabled
        3 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server Enabled
Routing Table (Gateway Mode)
Destination     Gateway   Genmask         Metric Ref   Use   Interface   Type     Flags
127.0.0.1     127.0.0.1   255.255.255.255 1       0     0     lo          Static   UP,Gateway,Host
192.168.3.0     0.0.0.0   255.255.255.0   0       0     0     bdg3        Dynamic   UP
192.168.2.0     0.0.0.0   255.255.255.0   0       0     0     bdg2        Dynamic   UP
192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0   255.255.255.0   0       0     0     bdg1        Static   UP
192.168.1.0 192.168.1.1   255.255.255.0   1       0     0     bdg1        Static   UP,Gateway
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0   255.0.0.0       0       0     0     lo          Dynamic
Routing Table (Router Mode)
(Same)

cadet alain, you hit the nail on the head.    The router was doing Iner-VLAN routing, but the PCs were blocking the pings because they came from another subnet. Thank you for your help in resolving this.
I have a follow-up question if I may - I need to add a default route but can't seem to find a way to do that. Tried adding a static route with IP=0.0.0.0 Mask=0.0.0.0 but it will not allow it. My current routing table looks like this:
Destination   Gateway     Genmask           Metric Ref   Use Interface Type    Flags
127.0.0.1     127.0.0.1   255.255.255.255   1       0     0    lo         Static UP,Gateway,Host
192.168.2.0   0.0.0.0     255.255.255.0     0       0     0    bdg2       Dynamic UP
192.168.1.0   0.0.0.0     255.255.255.0     0       0     0    bdg1       Static UP
127.0.0.0     0.0.0.0     255.0.0.0         0       0     0    lo         Dynamic UP
It routes all packets to VLAN2 and VLAN3 correctly; but if a packet arrives to any other network address, I would like to get it to forward to another gateway on VLAN2 (at address 192.168.2.254). Can't seem to find a way to add a default route.

Cisco ASA static route Administrative Distance

Hello Dear Engineers,
In Cisco ASA 8.2(5) version I configured Static Route Floating with different Administrative Distances (for example, 10) , but IOS cannot accept this parameter. for verifying, show route command result shows administrative distance as 1 .
Configuration example:
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 1 track 1
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 10
S 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.1, outside2
Is this the bug of the IOS, or may-be I misconfigured something?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Samir,
Even Pix 8.0 version shows the correct ad value defined..... might be that would be a bug or misconfiguration from your end.
pixfirewall(config-if)# sh route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
       * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
       P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 1.1.1.2 to network 0.0.0.0
C    1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, out1
C    2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, out2
S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 1.1.1.2, out1
pixfirewall(config-if)# shut
pixfirewall(config-if)# sh route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
       * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
       P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 2.2.2.2 to network 0.0.0.0
C    2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, out2
S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [100/0] via 2.2.2.2, out2
pixfirewall(config-if)#
Regards
Karthik

Unable to create static route

Hello,
I am trying to setup my Linksys WRT55AG router in Router Operation Mode.
My configuration is as follows:
Internet Side:
WAN-192.168.0.1/24
gw 192.168.0.2
Internal Side:
LAN-10.10.10.1/24
In the Gateway mode, it seems to function as designed while in the Router mode, I am unable to create the following static route:
172.16.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.2 WAN interface.
The error states the following:
Invalid gateway address: not in 10.10.10.1/255.255.255.0 network
This makes no sense to me unless I am missing something here?

If you change the router into router mode you turn off NAT. This means you'll see the LAN IP addresses 10.10.10.* on the outside of the router. The reason why you cannot ping anything in the 192.168.0.* subnet anymore is simply because the devices connecte in 192.168.0.* don't have routes for 10.10.10.0 or better they forward it to the default gateway. For instance, if you ping 192.168.0.50 from 10.10.10.5 with the router in router mode:
10.10.10.5: 192.168.0.50 is not in the LAN, thus it sends the packet to the default gateway 10.10.10.1
10.10.10.1: the router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50
192.168.0.50: receives the ping request and send the ping reply to 10.10.10.5.
192.168.0.50: 10.10.10.5 is not in the LAN. There is no static route for 10.10.10.5 available. Therefore the packet is forwarded to the default gateway which is 192.168.0.2 in your LAN.
192.168.0.2: 10.10.10.5 is not known to be connected to either the LAN or WAN side. Therefore the router will forward the packet its own default gateway which will be the gateway router of your ISP.
ISP router: the router will simply drop packets with private source or destination addresses, thus it will drop a packet for 10.10.10.5
The problem is that neither the computers inside 192.168.0.* nor the router 192.168.0.2 knows about the existence of the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet inside your LAN. You have to add static routes on router to get access into the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet.
The reason why it works in gateway mode, i.e. with NAT enabled, is simply because above the router 10.10.10.1 will do something differently:
10.10.10.1: **The router does NAT. It will first replace the source IP address of the packet from 10.10.10.1 with its own "public" IP address which is 192.168.0.1.** The router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50.
Note, that the ICMP ping received on the target has a source IP address of 192.168.0.1 now instead of 10.10.10.5 as before. The router and computers in side 192.168.0.* all know how to send something to 192.168.0.1.
Regarding the extra route: packets not matched with any other static router will be forwarded to the default gateway. The default gateway is 192.168.0.2 on your Linksys. You don't need the route. The router should not show this strange error message because the route for itself is O.K. but adding the route won't change the routing of the router.

Seeking static route help

After having inserted my own router as the internet gateway router and relegated the Verizon one to be a secondary one that just communicates with the STBs I would like to know if any could explain to me how to set up static routes to be able to access it via a wired connection as I would like to turn of the wireless side of it.
Now have a double NAT'd setup as follows
ONT -> WAN Netgear subnet 192.168.0
Netgear Lan port 1 -> Wan VZ Westell subnet 192.168.1
Moca connections to STBs
Ethernet connections to exposed (Port forwarded) machines
Netgear Lan Port 2 -> Wan Dlink subnet 192.168.3
Dlink Lan port -> 1GB NIC desktop machine 192.168.3.99
From the desktop machine at 192.168.3.99 I want to be able to get to the admin pages of the VZ router at 192.168.1.1 and also to some exposed machines on the 192.168.1 subnet
I'm guessing I need static routes defined at the dlink router at 192.168.3.1 and the netgear router at 192.168.0.1
On paper this looks very simple but I cannot work out what the static routes are meant to say
Any have any hints that would help me out?

Fixed it. once I looked at the Westell logs
Finally realized that the static routes I built were fine and the problem is that I was being blocked at the firewall.
Can't put the router in the DMZ and can't port forward to the the router's lan ip address (192.168.1.1). Allowed remote admin on the router and it works fine - would be nice if the router allowed you to choose some obscure port but I guess it's not really much of a sexurity risk as the router's wan port is inside the private network anyway.

Advertise implicit-null label for static routes

Hi, I want to ask if there is any way to change the label or stop adveritise label for an static route. Normally LDP advertises an Implicit Null label for directly connected routes. We want to do similar thing for static routes.
We need to do this is because somehow we need to do rate-limit on the PE interface connecting to the core network instead of the interface connecting to CE. As the incoming packets still got labelled, the rate-limit is skipped. So we want to stop the PE creates label for the static routes or advertises them with implicit null label. Thanks in advance.

Calvin,
Bear in mind that if you only enter the "no mpls ldp advertise-label" command, LDP will stop propagating all labels, which might not ba what you want. If you selectively want to propagate certain labels, then you need to also use "mpls advertise label for " as Shivlu suggested.
Regards,

Check for Null in Mediator Static Routing filter

Using Expression Builder for Mediator component how can I check the values for NULL in a particular XML element. In my case the XSD is
<xs:complexType name="OdsCadDataSet">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="odsCadCase" type="OdsCadCase" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadEvent" type="OdsCadEvent" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadUnitStatus" type="OdsCadUnitStatus"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
I want to check in expression builder of mediator whether odsCase, odsCadEvent, odsCadUnitStatus is been processed. I have three static routing for each element and plan to put filter which checks is odsCadCase is null and so forth. How to have this use case.
Thanks
Edited by: user5108636 on 28/06/2010 00:15

helo, i have same problem here...
I have a xsd:choice on request like this:
<message>
<properties>
<property name="tracking.compositeInstanceId" value="80003"/>
<property name="tracking.ecid" value="0000J1MQVAZBDC^5lVg8yZ1DtZWJ000T5r"/>
<property name="transport.http.remoteAddress" value="10.106.17.137"/>
</properties>
<parts>
<part name="request">
<ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
<ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:anoGuia>2011</ns1:anoGuia>
<ns1:numeroGuia>314</ns1:numeroGuia>
<ns1:codigoFatoGerador>6</ns1:codigoFatoGerador>
<ns1:codigoPorte>77011</ns1:codigoPorte>
</ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoPorte/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:idPessoa/>
</ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:numeroGuiaPai/>
<ns1:anoGuiaPai/>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
</ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:dataVencimento/>
<ns1:valorMulta/>
<ns1:percentualDesconto/>
<ns1:percentualAcrescimo/>
</ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
</ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
</part>
</parts>
</message>
I tried everything to check if some of the requests are filled but allways mediator returns null:
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaReferenciaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaCompensacao.getGuiaCompensacao"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "$in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaCompensacaoRequest != ''" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaRemanescenteService.getGuiaRemanescente"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaRemanescenteRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaMultaService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaMultaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDividaAtiva.getGuiaDividaAtiva"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDividaAtivaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDesarquivamento.getGuiaDesarquivamento"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaComplementarService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaComplementarRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaNormalService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaNormalRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>

Cannot remove misstyped static route

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for