Canon Powershot S100V Supported Format?

Does anyone know if the Canon S100V is a supported format? I have installed the Camera Raw 6.6 plug-in to CS5 but I cannot open the S100V images as I still get the 'camera model not supported' error message. The Adobe documentation says that Camera Raw 6.6 supports the S100 but there is no mention of the S100V (Chinese version of the camera).

madjohn1 wrote:
… Adobe documentation says that Camera Raw 6.6 supports the S100 but there is no mention of the S100V (Chinese version of the camera).
That would be enough to make that model not supported. If it's not mentioned, it's not supported.

Similar Messages

IPhoto does not support Canon Powershot S45 RAW Format

Hi,
It seems iPhoto does not support Canon Powershot S45 RAW file format. Can this be added to be supported!?
Does anyone know how to report this to Apple and request this as a feature enhancement?

Or this link: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html

Canon Powershot SX1

Hi!
I'd like to know if the Canon Powershot SX1 RAW format will be supported in ACR 5.4. At the moment, the SX1 is not listed among the supported cameras (Camera Raw 5.4 plug-in release candidate).
I'd pretty much like the update to support the SX1 because I hate using Canon's software for RAW conversion (not flexible, slow, etc.).
Cheers,
Aline

See on DPReview http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=31937565

Is the RAW format of Canon PowerShot G7X possibile in Lightroom ver. 5.7?

I use Lightroom 5 on my Acer PC. I have just bought a new camera, Canon PowerShot G7X, with Raw format possibility. I have also upgraded my Lightroom 5 to version 5.7. Still the application will not accept the RAW format pictures taken with this camera. Do I do something wrong, or does the latest version (5.7) not include the RAW format of Canon PowerShot G7X?

Hi Jan,
Yes your PowerShot G7 X is supported with LR 5.7. Would suggest you to make sure your Lr is up-to-date(From Help>Updates).
In case you still get that issue, try the below suggestions and check.
Restore Lr preferences. Recover catalog, images after resetting preferences
Create new Lr catalog, import G7 X raw files and then check.
Let me know how it goes.
Thanks
~ Arpit

Now Here! Support for the Canon PowerShot G1

After much trial and error, I have figured out how to support the Canon PowerShot G1.
I started with the settings for the hacked un-supported G2 (thanks to user jpugsley for this message: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=262930). Then I read the source code to the open source dcraw.c command line raw convertor. There I found Adobe's translation values for the G1 which has a CYGM filter array. I'd say this opens up opportunities for many other CYGM cameras to be supported.
The premul values seem to affect the color balance of the images. Adjusting the values very slightly may be helpful. I don't know what most of the other values are. The m2 array values came from dcraw.c You probably shouldn't touch those.
The images seem to open fine in Preview and Aperture. I hope Apple officially supports this camera soon (Aperture 1.1?).
How To:
All you have to do is paste the following XML into this file (make sure you save a backup of the file first). Rebooting is NOT needed:
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Frameworks/ImageIO.fram ework/Versions/Current/Resources/Raw.plist
<key>Canon-PowerShot G1</key>
<dict>
<key>blackReplace</key> <true/>
<key>black</key> <integer>32</integer>
<key>max</key> <integer>1023</integer>
<key>white</key> <integer>1023</integer>
<key>premul0</key> <real>1.00</real> <key>premul1</key> <real>1.2</real> <key>premul2</key> <real>1.1</real> <key>premul3</key> <real>1.11</real>
<key>m1</key>
<array>
<real>1.0507</real> <real>-0.4281</real> <real>-0.0161</real>
<real>-0.5540</real> <real>1.2938</real> <real>0.2909</real>
<real>-0.1205</real> <real>0.1844</real> <real>0.8335</real>
<real>-0.1566</real> <real>1.1051</real> <real>0.0577</real>
</array>
<key>m2</key>
<array>
<real>-0.4778</real> <real>0.9467</real> <real>0.2172</real>
<real>0.4743</real> <real>-0.1141</real> <real>0.4344</real>
<real>-0.5146</real> <real>0.9908</real> <real>0.6077</real>
<real>-0.1566</real> <real>1.1051</real> <real>0.0577</real>
</array>
<key>mc</key> <real>0.83355</real>
<key>otrc</key>
<array>
<real>0.00</real> <real>0.090</real> <real>1.467</real> <real>0.260</real> <real>1.842</real> <real>0.652</real> <real>1.040</real> <real>0.538</real>
</array>
</dict>

This is stellar.
Thanks. It wasn't as hard as I thought it would be... I didn't think it was possible at first.
is this in fact all
there is to supporting a new camera RAW format --
providing a translation array in a plist file?
What follows is pure speculation... I really don't have a solid understanding of this at all.
Seems like all you have to do is get these Camera->XYZ trans values (trans may stand for transform or translate). The image is essentially monochrome with color filters over it. Some cameras use RGB filters, looks like Apple has supported a lot of those. Some are CYGM, so far Apple hasn't supported any of those. Apple has supported the Sony DSC F828 which is RGBE where E stands for Emerald. Total guess, but each set of three values in the m2 array is associated with a color. (9 total for RGB and 12 for CYGM and RGBE). Guessing, each of these sets of three values probably is used to calculate a response curve for each color.
Basically, when dcraw.c provided twelve values, I began to poke around Raw.plist and discovered the Sony F828 camera also had 12 values in its m2 array. It also had 4 premul (pre-multiplier) values, one for each set of 3 m2 values. So I took a leap of faith that CYGM could be supported because after all, a color is just a color. Does the computer really care if the value represents emerald or magenta? This produced a promising image but color was way off. I had to then tweak each premul value to bring the color in. Those values don't seem to be linear. A minor adjustment can either dramatically change everything or have no noticeable effect.
Are all RAW formats essentially supported via simply a
declarative filter array, or did it just happen to
work for G1 RAW, and other formats are different?
My amateur guess is many cameras are similar and a few stand out as different. For example, I'm guessing the Foveon cameras are an example of a different sort of RAW file. Thats just a guess based on looking at dcraw.c.
if this is all there is to
supporting a new RAW format, I wonder
- why more of the RAW formats weren't supported in the first place.
To get you to buy a fancy new camera on the Apple Store? Lazyness? Not enough time? Lack of cooperation from the manufacturer? All of the above?
- why RAW formats haven't been progressively added
since the Aperture release.
Seems like they could have had support for dozens of additional cameras. This took me only a matter of hours to figure out. Someone with a deep understanding could have done this in minutes.
The real time sink is when you almost have the colors correct and you are endlessly tweaking trying to get them perfect... as you will see, the colors will be fine in certain exposures and way off in others. Look at daylight vs. tungsten photos. It may take many hours to get the values of the camera correct to customers exacting standards. We, the photographers, are very picky.
Why don't we just contact Canon, Nikon, etc. and get
their translation values?
There are values for 83 additional cameras that aren't supported by Apple in the dcraw.c file. That's a place to start.

Canon Powershot s40 RAW support hack WORKS!

Kudos to Jason Pugsley for the following (Powershot G2 data, but it works just fine and dandy for the Powershot S40!!!)
<<< Following copied from Jason's thread on the Powershot G2>>>
This camera is a bit old but if you want to import images in RAW format you can try this hack. Hopefully Apple will have official support soon.
I started with the settings for the already-supported G3. Feel free to modify the values if you've got any idea what they're for...
Edit this file (make sure you save a backup first)
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Frameworks/ImageIO.fram ework/Versions/Current/Resources/Raw.plist
NOTE: You'll need to set RW permissions before editing and reset afterwards <<<<</div>
<key>Canon-PowerShot S40</key> 
<dict>
<key>blackReplace</key> <true/>
<key>black</key> <integer>32</integer>
<key>max</key> <integer>1023</integer>
<key>white</key> <integer>1023</integer>
<key>premul0</key> <real>1.90</real> <key>premul1</key> <real>1.00</real> <key>premul2</key> <real>1.22</real>
<key>m1</key>
<array>
<real>1.0507</real> <real>-0.4281</real> <real>-0.0161</real>
<real>-0.5540</real> <real>1.2938</real> <real>0.2909</real>
<real>-0.1205</real> <real>0.1844</real> <real>0.8335</real>
</array>
<key>m2</key>
<array>
<real>0.9087</real> <real>-0.2693</real> <real>-0.1049</real>
<real>-0.6715</real> <real>1.4382</real> <real>0.2537</real>
<real>-0.2291</real> <real>0.2819</real> <real>0.7790</real>
</array>
<key>mc</key> <real>0.83355</real>
<key>otrc</key>
<array>
<real>0.450</real> <real>0.090</real> <real>1.467</real> <real>0.260</real> <real>1.842</real>
<real>0.652</real> <real>1.040</real> <real>0.538</real>
</array>
</dict>

Also note,
Powershot S40 CRW's I'd archived within Aperture rendered almost immediately (as did .DNG's based on them). But the RAW adjustment fine tuning did not appear in the Inspector/HUD.
(My assumption on the above is that Aperture initially identified them as non-RAW vs. unsupported, and therefore set a flag somewhere saying that RAW adjustments were not valid).
There is another thread on this for the Nikon D80, so I followed its solution ....
Export the masters, delete masters, re-import the masters!
All works well!

RAW-support, Canon PowerShot G1 X

Has anyone heard anything about this RAW-support for Canon PowerShot G1 X?
I can see the miniatures when importing but once imported I only get a black image and the text "Unsupported Image Format".

RAWS are not yet supported, but it should be int he next update:
http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/raw.html
That miniature that you see is just the embedded JPEG preview. For now you can shoot RAW + JPEG and when it is supported reprocess your Raws.

How to set raw format for canon powershot a1100 is ? ,,according to the specs online it can.

how to set raw format for canon powershot a1100 is ? ,,according to the specs online it can.

It requires the Canon Hacker's Developement Kit (CHDK). It runs off of your SD card and does not harm your camera. Download a program called Stick-
http://zenoshrdlu.com/stick/stick.html
Follow the directions and you will be able to shoot in RAW along with some other deatures not available on your camera previously.

Unsupported Image Format - Canon Powershot S110

I am having issues after moving from a Macbook Air 13" to a Macbook Pro 13" Retina. I have a Canon Powershot S110 that I use when
I travel. I normally use a 1DS Mark II. The S110 is a new camera on the market and was unsupported in Aperture until version 3.4... When I updated the software on the Air to 3.4.2, I believe, the file format finally was recognized and life was good. However, I have now transferred everything over to the Pro 13" Retina and I cannot get it to recognize the image format... I have been to the Apple Store and worked for two hours with a Genius and nothing. I have tried completely wiping the drive and reinstalling the most recent version of the OS and then only installing Aperture 3.4.3 and it still will not work... I do not understand how it could be working on the Air and not on the Pro. I would greatly appreciate any insight any of you may have. Thanks!

Looks like there's an issue with attempting to install the latest RAW update on the recently-announced Macs.
You'll need to edit your /System/Library/CoreServices/SystemVersion.plist file to be able to install it, then change it back after the install is done. If you're comfortable with the Terminal you can use pico/vi/emacs to change the ProductBuildVersion from 12C2034 to 12C1999, do the install, then change it back.
If you're not comfortable with the Terminal, then navigate through your "System" folder on your hard drive to find the "SystemVersion.plist" file, copy it to your desktop, then make another copy of it (for backup purposes). Open it in TextEdit to change the ProductBuildVersion from 12C2034 to 12C1999. Copy the edited version back to the CoreServices folder, and you should be able to install the RAW updater.
After the install is finished, change the version number back by renaming the backup copy you made back to its original name and copy that back into the CoreServices folder.

HT201071 Please add support for Camera RAW Canon PowerShot G2

Please add support for Camera RAW Canon PowerShot G2,
it may be ancient, but there are still a lot of G2s out there, and it's annoying to have a different workflow for pictures from them...
best,
case

You are not writing to Apple here. This is a user to user help forum.
Instead, send your comments or suggestions directly to Apple via Mac OS X Feedback.
You are unlikely to get a direct response from your "Fedback", but you can be certain that the responsible Apple people will see your input for consideration in future product development.

RAW Support Canon Powershot G1X Mark II

Dear all,
I have LR Version 4.3 and I am thinking about an upgrade to the current version (LR 5.4) in order to process RAW Files from my new Canon Powershot G1X Mark II. BUT...
...the release notes say: "preliminary support" for this camera only.
What does that exactly mean?
Will there be an upDATE (free of charge) which provides full support?
Or will I have to upGRADE to LR 6 for full support?
Thanks a lot for your answers.
olitsche

The timing of, even the existence of releases whether free dot releases like 5.5 or major paid releases like 6.0 are not normally published and anyone who knows likely can't say.
Preliminary support usually means, it will work but there may be a small hitch or two along the way that was unrealized in testing. You can always download and install the trial of 5.4 and test it yourself for 30 days.
Of course if you get a Creative Cloud membership, you are covered no matter what.

Cck not supporting canon powershot a580 camera?

Hi, i purchased the camera connection kit but for some reason i cannot seem to connect my canon powershot a580 camera using usb.
Same goes for my samsung camera.
using the memory card cck device i also cannot transfer photo's to my ipad.
This goes for all my 7 memorycards, ranging from 2gb upto 16gb.
What is going on here?
Also tried it on my wife's ipad 1 on ios 3.2.2 and then i can ocnnect everying!
Why can't i use any of the devices and memory cards on my ipad 2?
This doesn't make any sense!
I have the 64gb mostly for transfering pictures and showing them on my tv and now i am stuck with to my old ipad1 with only 16gb?
Apple please fix this as this is ridiculous!!!

I have a A60, I use gphoto2 and digikam and works perfect, I only had to edit fstab to allow normal users use the usb, I followed more a less this howto: http://www.phil.uni-sb.de/~nkuttler/os/powershot/

PSE11: How to import Raw files from Canon Powershot SX60 HS Bridge Camera? [was: Dear Sir,]

I have just purchased a Canon Powershot SX60 HS Bridge Camera. I have Photoshop Elements 11 and I cannot import Raw files. How do I download the latest version of Camera Raw into Elements 11?
T.W. Gasby

Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications
With Elements 11 you cannot.
The SX60 HS was first supported in Camera Raw 8.7 which is only compatible with Elements 13 and later.
Options:
Pay to upgrade to Elements 13
Free option: download the Adobe DNG converter, convert all SX60 HS Raw files to DNG format then edit the DNGs in Elements 11
Photoshop Help | Digital Negative (DNG)

Photoshop Elements 8 and Canon Powershot G15.

I have Photoshop Elements 8 and a Canon Powershot G15. I need to download Raw from this camera, which appears to be impossible, although it will download from my Nikon D60. Do I need a plug in to achieve the result with the Powershot; if so what will it cost and how do I get it? Thanks,
brucem

Hi,
The G15 is supported in Camera Raw 7.3 (or later) which, unfortunately, is not compatible with Photoshop Elements 8.
You can either upgrade to Photoshop Elements 11 (or later) or download and install the free Adobe DNG converter. You copy your CR2 to a folder and then give the DNG converter that folder name. The converter will then convert those files to the DNG format. the DNG files can then be used by Photoshop Elements 8.
DNG Converter 8.7
Mac – http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5858
Win – http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5864
Useful Tutorial
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bqGovpuihw
Brian

ARC rendering of DNG Files of photos shot with the new Canon Powershot G16 with "PSE V10 + CR 6.4.1" and with "PSE V13 + CR 8.6"

Because (for reasons which are not relevant to my questions): I can not reasonably migrate to the newest PSE Versions and I am more or less stuck for a couple of years to the use PSE V10. I am therefore looking for a relatively efficient solution to process/edit (a small percentage) of the RAW Files of my new/future camera(s) with the combination of PSE V10 and CR 6.4.1 (according to my understanding PSE V10 does not support CR 8.6 – PSE V10 does not even allow me to import RAW Files of new cameras into the PSE catalog).
I was hoping that the DNG Converter could be a good solution for me. I was intending
to convert the RAW Files of my new camera (and of my future new cameras) with an up-to-date version of the DNG converter,
import the .dng Files into PSE V10
and then look-at (and then for some few of them: edit) the DNG Files with the combination of PSE V10 and CR 6.4.1.
However, I got recently the impression, that the only Camera Profile of CR 6.4.1 that renders reasonably well the DNG Files of my new Canon Powershot G16 compact camera is the “Adobe Standard” Camera Profile. In my tests with the combination of PSE V10 and ACR 6.4.1, the rendering of these DNG Files with other CR 6.4.1 Profiles (e.g. the “Camera Faithful” Profile) is (regarding colors and brightness/contrast) really ugly and (for a non-expert like me) more or less unusable (while the rendering of the same DNG File with the “Camera Faithfull” Profile of the combination of CR 8.6 + PSE V13 is quite reasonable).
May I please ask the following questions to somebody who is familiar with DNG and CR?
Do my observations (i.e. ugly rendering of Canon Powershot G16 photos with the “Camera Faithful Profile” of ACR 6.4.1) correspond to what DNG experts should and are expecting?
What is the probable reason of the ugly rendering of the “Camera Faithful” Profile of CR 6.4.1? Does the DNG converter not include a G16-specific “Camera Faithful” profile in the DNG file?
Or do you think, that I made something wrong and that I am the one to blame for the ugly rendering with the “Camera Faithful” Profile used by CR 6.4.1? If that’s the case: what did I probably do wrong and what can I do better?
Do you think that with the combination of PSE V10 and CR 6.4.1, I will have similar problems with the DNG conversion of Raw files of future cameras like the follow-on to the Nikon D5300 or D7100 (which I will probably like to buy once available)? Or do you think that the problems that I encountered with the Powershot G16 photos are unlikely to happen with most other new camwras?A lot of thanks in advance for your answers.
In case you might wish to look at the typical rendering of one of my DNG Files (created with Version 8.6.0.254 of the DNG converter) of a Canon Powershot G16 .cr2 photo, I uploaded at https://www.dropbox.com/l/T3LJyZWkBZpcKkNe8S8ufr
following screenshots:
rendering with PSE V10 and CR 6.4.1 with the “Adobe Standard” Camera Profile” – looks OK
rendering with PSE V10 and CR 6.4.1 with the “Camera Faithful” Profile – looks ugly.
I did not create screenshots of the ugly rendering by CR 6.4.1 with other Camera Formats..
rendering with PSE V13 and CR 8.6 with the “Adobe Standard” Camera Profile – looks OK
rendering with PSE V13 and CR 8.6 with the “Camera Faithful” Profile – looks OK
screenshot of the unedited jpg. File created by the camera - looks OK

Thank You very much to all of You: in alphanumerical sequence to 99jon, to R Kelly and to ssprengel. You spoiled me with the Information in your answers. Thank You very much for it.
Based on your answers I will first try the probably simplest solution: the download of ACR 6.7.
If that will not work for me, I will try/investigate something else, that, if I interpret your suggestions correctly is the following: create with the combination of PSE 13 and ACR 8.6 profiles that I will try to use with the combination of PSE 10 and ACR 6.7 or 6.4. That is an idea that I was not at all aware of and that I owe to you.
All that is quite new to me, and I can therefore imagine that I will come back to you and ask for detailed suggestions or directions.
A Detail: it is on the same machine / same Windows-occurence that I have installed the combination of "PSE V10 + ACR 6.4" and the combination of "PSE V13 and ACR 8.6".
1) The main reason why I can not use for my main real-life "productive" PSE Catalog the combination of "PSE V13 and ACR 8.6" is the lack of Support of/by the 32-bit mode "KODAK Digital ROC Professional" Filter/Plug-in in a PSE V13 Environment. I need and will need that filter for a couple of years for the retouching/restoration of thousands scanned Versions of my old slides that have a strong color-cast. I am also using the 32-bit mode "Kodak Digital GEM Professional" Filter for a strong noise reduction in the scanned Versions of my old slides (but I can imagine, that I could find good 64-bit mode alternatives to the GEM Filter).
2) In addition I have with the V12 and V13 PSE Editors, for a lot of my photos files, problems with the wrong Dates/Times assigned by the V12/V13 PSE Editors to new file containing a new/edited version of my Foto files.....
But these 2 previous items are other stories/problems that I would like and shoud keep separate.
Thank You again for your wonderfull help.
Robert

Canon Powershot S100V Supported Format?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for