Capacitor tester

Hi everybody, 
I'm new at labview and was hoping if someone could help with a basic question.
I have to make a program that checks capacitors, the program uses a Velleman card VM110N or K8055.
I try to give is short and simple:
-Measure time.
-send 5 volts (255) to the card (which has a resistor and a capacitor wired up to it)
-measure the time it takes to get over 63% (this is 1 Tau)
-charge another 5 tau until fully charged.
the program also has to discharge, measure time etc again, calculate tau again, discharge another 5 tau, rinse and repeat, with the data you can calculate the capacity of capacitor and give approval or disapproval by a led lighting up and finally save it into an excel document.
but for now I'd like it to just charge, measure time until 63%, then I'd have 1 Tau,  (and then charge 5XTau.)
The rest I should be able to manage.
even if you don't have that velleman card I hope you can give some comments what I did wrong, I set it up pretty basic, remember I'm just a beginner, only the stuff in the flat sequence is mine, the rest was set up already, I've been at this for ages (really, I'm too embarrassed to even say how long), I'm sure it's quite simple, but if someone could just give me a clue or two.
Hope someone can help me, thanks so much in advance!
(ps I posted this somewhere else too, but I thought this was a better location for my question even though this thread is very old)
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
for forum.vi ‏27 KB

Mark1357,
It would be better to start a new thread since this one is marked solved. Many people do not pay much attention to old, solved threads. This is probably the best Board for your question.
1. Please look at the online tutorials for Getting Started with LabVIEW.
2. With a state machine architecture you would only need one loop and no local variables. Multiple loops are not a problem although the way you have used them limits the flexibility of your program. Local variables may lead to race conditions. The Con local might be written before or after the terminal is written inside the loop. In practice it will amost always be written first but this cannot be guaranteed by your code. Similarly the 1 Tau local in the seqeunce structure might be read before or after the terminal is written.  These race condtions can produce unexpected results.
3. The Tick count in the first frame of the sequence structure executes in parallel with the CLFN (Output). No way to know which happens first.
If the DLL takes less than a millisecond to execute, it does not matter. It would be better to put the Tick Count in a separate frame after the CLFN node.
4. The one iteration loops could be eliminated by wiring the error clusters in and out. Learn how data flow works to your advantage.
5. There is no need to write the Scope property nodes every millisecond. Learn to use the event structure so that you only write to the property nodes if the x-axis length changes.
6. If the device is not connected the middle while loop still runs once and the inner loops will still wait for the user to press the end program (Stop) button. Better: Enclose the middle loop in the True case of a case structure.
7. There is no need for the 1 ms Wait in the outer loop when the inner loop has a 20 ms wait.
Lynn

Similar Messages

  • Ues of Electrical Power Suite for variable frequency test

    My customer is doing capacitor testing. He would like to measure the phase angle whiile varying the source frequency. Can the Electrical Power Suite be used for this? If not can you make a recommendation (basically for measuring power factor)?

    I do not have the Electrial Power Suite so I cannot comment on its suitability.  In addition to posting here, there is an Electrial Power Suite on the Forums, although it gets very little traffic.  Some of the NI people involved with the suite seem to monitor that Board.
    Assuming that your customer has suitable instrumentation and data acquisition hardware, it should not be too difficult to measure/calculate phase angle with LabVIEW and standard DAQ drivers.
    Can you be more specific about the equipment?
    Lynn

  • I use LabWindows/CVI and SCXI modules, how can i check the polarity of a capacitor during an ICT?

    I am a newbie using CVi Lab Windows and SCXI modules, how can i perform ICTs to check the proper polarity of a capacitor?

    Hello,
    That's a big question for a single sentence. Could you give some more details about the hardware you have, and the measurements you want to take?
    By the way, when you say ICT, do you mean In-Circuit Test or something else?
    Thanks,
    John N
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • What kind of problems can leaking capacitors cause?

    I inherited a faulty iMac G5 from a family member.  It would not boot up and the service center that dealt with it said the hard drive was bad.  It was still functional enough to extract valuable data from it, though.  I surmised that it wasn't really "bad"... just suffering from some damaged system files or directory structure.
    With all valuable data copied off of the drive, I figured it would be best to completely wipe it and install fresh.  However, during the process the system would crash before installation completed.  In a few cases that I tried this, I could boot off of the 2nd DVD and actually interface with the system.  But, any running of the Disk Utility on the internal HDD volume would trigger a crash.  Running "fsck -fy" in single user mode would reveal errors, but the system couldn't fix them all.  And then at some points, I couldn't even get single user mode to work without crashing.
    Long story short, I tested out the install with just one memory DIMM installed in slot 0, and found that it worked a little better with one of the DIMMs.  I was able to run another erase/install again.  FINALLY, the computer is working OK without crashes.
    However, in doing this whole troubleshooting adventure, I noticed that a number of capacitors (maybe 5 or 6) are leaking slightly from the top.  You can see a tiny dollup of beige powder in the middle of the vent lines on top .  I read up on faulty capacitors and they can cause voltage fluctuations seemingly at random.  And this can wreak havoc on hardware.
    So... I need to isolate this down a bit.  I ran the disk utility and the HDD checks out fine now.  If it was wearing out, wouldn't it continue to show up as faulty?  I'm starting to wonder if a coincidence of capacitor issues caused bad data to get written to the hard drive and screw it up.  Also, I'm wondering if any of the faulty capacitors could be in the circuitry path of the memory, that might cause it to experience subtle flaws and introduce errors... or even become damaged.
    Lastly, any leaking capacitors means that they should be replaced and that it may be a gamble as to how long they'll continue to work before more serious problems arise.  Is there any rule of thumb about this where the G5 is concerned?  If the leaking is minor and no bulging of the capacitors is evident, might the computer work fine for a while, at least a few months until I'm able to embark on a capacitor refresh project?
    Thanks for any relevant advice.

    It's not worthwhile investing too much time or money in one of these. I had 3 logic boards replaced by Apple, all of which failed because they used refurbished boards, either with the same bad caps or boards that had been lying around for ages where the replaced caps slowly went bad over time from not having been formed. In fact, replacing the caps with known good ones would have been preferable to getting a replacement board from Apple.
    The last board was the coup de grace, with the video chip failing -- another common issue with these turkeys.
    My guess is the memory slot might be bad or that module. I've never heard of the caps fouling that part of the computer. But that's just my guess. I'd just keep using it until it dies, but I would be sure to have a backup (a bootable clone would be my preference) on an external drive so you don't lose all your data if and when it suddenly goes out.
    But caps are relatively cheap and if you have the time, the expertise and the confidence....
    See Spudnuty's posts on caps. He hasn't been around in a while, but he was the resident guru on fixing these things with bad caps. He did that all the time, but the video chip failure is probably insurmountable.
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/11897383#11897383
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2287036?threadID=2287036&tstart=0
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/11513969?messageID=11513969#11513969

  • Initial testing Multisim + ULTIboard Buglist

    I have been testing Multisim and ULTIboard (V10.0.144) for 1 day to see whether it really works and is usable.
    I'm still working with Ulticap and Ultiboard V5.7x and consider changing over.
    I have found the following problems in the process of Schematic-entry to layout.
    Multisim
    1.  Netnames can not have delimiters like + and -.That is not so nice, specially, since imported schematics allow this and  are not checked for this.
    2. Once a schematic is transferred to ULTIboard, the router only routes on the top layer. This is caused by an incorrect setting in Multisim (routing layer is set to top by default.
    This propagates via the netlist to ULTIboard. Manual routing is not limited.
    3. Multisim allows enabling of gate and pin swap. The default is OFF. This should probably be ON.
    4. gate swap know On/Off, but ultiboard interprets On as "Internal swaps only". The designed obviously did not know the idea behind this. Ultiboard allows inter-gate swaps if the other (common connections) match with the other package. Thus Ultiboard should interpret ON as "Advanced swapping". 5. After gateswap (in ULTIboard) and backannotation into Multisim, the unused gate list does not represent the new situation. When placing new gates, one can place a gate that is already in use.
    6. The Reports "Bill of material, "Netlist report" and "Spare gate report" lack a CSV (comma or tab separated) list. If excell is not available, but OpenOffice or a database is, there is no way to get there. Oddly enough, the spreadsheet view does allow CSV output....., but does not have a BOM.
    ULTIboard
    1. Slotted holes can be made and show correctly. However in the DRILL file, it is wrong. In my case, a horizontal slot came out vertically. A vertical slot also vertically.
    2. A forward annotate to ULTIboard un-places parts that are updated. This is NEVER what you want. Specially if you want to change all resistors and capacitors to a different SMT shape.
    3. Gate swapping in Ultiboard does NOT allow to swap to unused gates. This makes the function sort of useless. It must allow to swap to ALL (identical) gates in a package.
    4. The pin swap function does not show which pins can be swapped. You now have to rely in Click-and-miss.
    3. There should be an option per component, to exclude it from component  shoving. Think of a heat sink or RF shielding can, that must be placed over other parts.
     Note that I have not done any serious tests on the gerber and drill output.
    I know that this is a 'negative' list, but these are not difficult issue to solve and do make the package workable.
    Also, I do like a number of important features that do work:
    - Multiple instances of a single (hierarchical) sheet
    - Automatic sheet symbol creation/update
    - Copper in footprints
    - drawing on any layer, allowing for proper production preparation.

    Hi, first of all, I really want to thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I went through all the suggestions and I will provide you with the
    "where we are at" on each of them.
    Before listing each feedback, I wanted to recommend that you use the latest evaluation edition (10.1); which you are also able to update to the latest build(10.1.0.1) if needed. This will ensure that you are working with the most up-to-date evaluation. 
    I will describe each suggestion with the same number that you had on your posting.
    Multisim
    For the next update (date TBA) we are allowing delimiters in more parts of the suite (Multisim and Ultiboard) which were previously forbiden. However, specifically for netnames we have not yet implemented the ability to use delimiters. We are currently working to overcome this limitation in the mid-term.
    This has been fixed in two phases, one was added to the 10.1 release, and the other phase will be added in our next update (date TBA).
    I filed a feature request for R&D so they can change the default settings. Makes a lot of sense to have it enable by default.
    I filed a feature request for R&D so they can evaluate changing the current behaviour.
    This was hard to reproduce but I was able to see the behaviour once. I filed a defect for R&D. I'm using the latest version (10.1 with update 10.1.0.1). Part of the fix for this is in the works, is in a mid-term improvement project for Forward and Back Annotation procedures.
    I filed a feature request for R&D so they can add this ability to the reports.
    Ultiboard
    This is fixed. Is working correctly in the latest version.
    The fix for this is in the works, is in a mid-term improvement project for Forward and Back Annotation procedures.
    I filed a defect for this manner. Unused gates should be available to be swapped from Ultiboard, agreed.
    I filed a feature request for this one. The pins that belong to the same PINGROUP for swapping should show a guide like the Gate Swap.
    I filed a feature request for R&D so they can review this request.
    Thank you for passing this information to us, I'm glad to see that a couple of the issues are already fixed in the current versions, other fixes are already in the works, and new features proposed will be recommended for future releases. This feedback helps us improve our product on every release.
    Nestor
    National Instruments

  • What does the error from my Apple Hardware Test mean?

    I was doing some maintenance on my iMac G5 (Ambient Light Sensor) this past week and found that my Video RAM might be bad.
    My first clue was that when I used the 'option' key on boot, one of the resulting screens was covered with vertical lines of about 1/16 of an inch.
    My second clue was that after running the Apple Hardware Tests, iMac Version 2.5.1 (the one that came with my iMac's original 10.4 Tiger installation disks), I was told there was a Video RAM error, but am not sure if I copied it right because all the little vertical lines. Here is what the AHT reported:
    ** ERROR ** ** ERROR ** ** ERROR **
    2ATI/1/4 113-xxxxx-117
    ** ERROR ** ** ERROR ** ** ERROR **
    Does anyone know what all this means? When I run OS X my desktop doesn't appear to have any video problems, so I was taken be surprise.
    Thanks.

    Well I just wanted to chime in I know this is a little late, but I just picked up a iMac G5 for $50 that had this same problem, I would recommend you take the back cover off of the iMac and inspect the capacitors, I did and found a blown capacitor I took the logic board out took it to a local PC repair shop and for $35 he replaced the blown cap. They don't have to be completely blown to mess things up just domed or really anything other than flat. I came home put it back together and everything works great. just something to consider I mean for 30-50 bucks what could it hurt otherwise if no blown caps are visible then your video chip needs to be reseated and I don't know what to tell you on that.

  • T510 Capacitor noise

    Dear Lenovo’s support team I just bought a brand new laptop LEVONO THINKPAD T510 Model: 4313CTO. The reason of this email is that I need your help to solve a problem that my laptop has since I received it. My laptop has an abnormal electronic noise, like a short circuit, I have experience in technical support, and I can notice that is a noise similar a capacitor noise. I test it with LENOVO THINKVANTAGE TOOLBOX running the SYSTEM STRESS TEST and it was successful , but I am still worried because it could probably has problems in few weeks, because of the capacitor noise. I am not in the US, I am now in Venezuela, where I live. I know that the warranty for these laptops are worldwide, and I would like to know how could I solve my problem, but I don’t want to be without laptop for too much time. Actually, I am disappointed with LENOVO because this is the second laptop that I have bought this year, and the first one has problem since one month after the purchase (LENOVO THINKPAD SL400 MODELO:2743A65), and I am still without computer, because the repair center still has my laptop, the report or ticket number is 434266. I hope that you take into account all this information to solve my problem, Thank you for your attention, I will be waiting for any information

    Is this a loud noise? My old Z60t had electrical noises esp. during LAN activity, and my W500 has electrical noises pretty much all the time. Even my desktop PC with an Asus motherboard makes strange electrical noises. All of these machines are 100% stable under any load.

  • In Circuit Test (ICT) in Teststand

    Hello Community,
    I am using NI PXI equipment with Dev Suite 2012 with Teststand/Switch Executive for a dual stage test fixture (ICT & FCT).
    Are there any methods or software by NI or third parties for developing the ICT portion of my test process easier? NI does a great job with functional test, but is there a good way to do ICT?
    Currently I am using a DMM, Switch Card, and Guard Amp. Writing a bunch of lines of code in teststand to toggle the switches on the card. Was wondering if there was a simpler way.
    Thank you,
    Kevin
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I would like to be able to read the values from an excel spreadsheet into a VI. Create a Teststand Pass/Fail Sequence with one line of code using the VI.
    The VI will have a For Loop that runs down the list of my spreadsheet. It will read R1 from the list, toggle the switches and guard amplifier on for R1 at the specified test points, take a measured reading, compare the measured value to the value range (900 to 1100 ohms), and return a result of pass or fail.
    Example Spreadsheet:
    ID
    Value
    Test Point 1
    Test Point 2
    Type
    R1
    1.00k
    TP1
    TP2
    Resistor
    R2
    10.0k
    TP3
    TP4
    Resistor
    My reasoning behind this is to standardize an ICT procedure with teststand. To be able to add and edit resistors or capacitors to be tested straight into the spreadsheet instead of the method I am doing now which is time consuming and messy. For each resistor I want to test it takes me about 5 lines of code to setup in teststand... 
    Connect Switches
    Connect Guard Amp
    VI Numeric Limit Test
    Disconnect Switches
    Disconnect Guard Amp
    I am open to suggestions, if there is a better way to do ICT or a way to speed up the process & setup of those 5 lines above? It just seems like doing ICT with NI Equipment is tedious.

  • Charging of capacitor, timing and flat-seque​nce struture

    Hello
    First I'll give you some information about my project:
    I'm quite new to Labview, but I have programmed alot with C++/C/Assembly. The attached program is a small part of a bigger system, but I made a quick version of it, just to get the hang of it. A capacitor (image) will be charged up to 3,3V. I'll do two measurement at 2,5 V and 3,3 V, at about 3 tau and 5 tau of the charging. There are some timelimits and it's here I got some problems.
    Sequence:
    From start the signal have to be 0V for atleast 300 ms.
    The the capacitor have to reach atleast 2,5V within 430 ms from start.
    Then the capacitor have to reach 3,3 V within a maximum of 510 ms from start.
    My attached program is built in a flat-sequence structure (maybe statemachine is better?). If I change the "Wait 300 ms" to "Wait 80" ms, the first time-check will pass. If I use 300 ms, the first time-check is about 600 ms and the last 950 ms (It should have been 430 ms  - 300 ms = 130 ms, and 510 ms).
    I'm not asking you to make anything for me, but maybe give me a hint where to look. Would a statemachine do better than the flat-sequence? Am I on the right track regarding time-checking, or is the Tick Count useless in this case?
    Is the code within the Ruby Goldberg category?
    Extra info: I got LV 2009 and 2010, but only the basic versions. The DAQ in my program can be replaced with a signalgenerator of 2,5 V and 3,3 V just for testing.
    I think the program does its job, but my timing is not on track.
    Thanks for any help.
    Regards,
    Even
    Regards,
    Even
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer
    Automated Test Developer
    Topro AS
    Norway
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    Charging of capacitor.vi ‏128 KB

    Hi again guys=)
    Well yesterday I used the Daq Assist. I find it quite useful, but since I've used it alot now, I think it would be better to use something like tbob put together.The thing I had some problems with was:
    I used the Daq Assist to get 1000 samples in 1000 ms. 1 sample per ms. Then I put that into an array using build array. After that I made a for-loop with 100 interrations, in other words I wanted 100 samples of the total of 1000, but on my graph I could not see anything.
    As soon I has connected A, the counter C would not count from 100 til 200, but only switching between 100 and 101. If I removed the connection A, the counter worked fine. The conversion of dynamic data automatically popped up when I made the connection. I also thought the index array worked like this:
    I can say which number in the array I want to read the data from.
    The problem is that it returns a value only at index 0 or 1.
    Then I finished at work. Today I'll study the context help abit more and try to find some other examples on how to extract data from an array.
    For now I'll study your snippet, tbob, and learn howto set-up Daq without the Daq Assist. I also see that my attempt to extract data from an array also was wrong so I'll try again in an other way.
    Thanks for the help guys
    Regards,
    Even
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer
    Automated Test Developer
    Topro AS
    Norway

  • Need help in testing multiple DUTs

    Hi All,
    I need to test 12 components : 7 variable capacitors and 5 inductors, using Agilant 4263 LCR meter
    Each component has a serial number that the operator has to enter into test program,
    The variable capacitors need to be adjusted, measured and set to specific values (within their respective tolerances as shown in the excel file)
    The inductors are fixed (not variable) and need to be measures only.
    Each one of these 12 components have their own test jig (some are bigger that the others)
    So the operator has to be prompted to change the DUT and jig, one after another, enter serial numbers and then adjust and measure.
    The test results of all 12 components should be written and saved to an existing excel template to specific cells and also to a tab delaminated text file
    I have attached the excel template and the column highlighted in yellow is where the measurement results should go.
    I have created a VI that measures a single capacitor. but it doesn't do what I need to do.
    I appreciate any help I can get.
    Thanks in advance

    Some comments:
    The code you attached to measure a capacitor has lots of sub-VIs (a Good Thing, usually), but they aren't included in the attachment (use a ZIP file to send everything together), so we can't suggest what the problem might be.
    You attached both a Text file and an Excel file that might represent the same data.  [Oops, my mistake -- I was going to say Excel is not Write to Spreadsheet, but you say that you want both].  I presume you have the Write to Excel code elsewhere ...
    Think a bit about how you want the program to "flow", and design it that way.  You might, for example, want to let the User choose which DUT to do next, or you might want to do them in strict order, 1 through 12.  You should probably have a series of Prompts ("Enter Capacitor Serial Number") followed by Verifications ("You entered C314159.  OK?").  Once all the units are loaded, what should the Operator do?  Does the test "stop itself", i.e. does each DUT know when it is finished?
    This design "sounds like" a State Machine to me, which implies a Loop + Case Statement for the various States, and some rules for transition between States.  Since you are also getting data from the Front Panel, this might be a good candidate for what I call (for want of a better name) a User Event State Machine, where you include a User Event, "State", and keep most things in the single Event Loop.
    Bob Schor

  • Capacitor question

    i got a kt4 ultra 5 months ago with an athlon xp 2800, i was working when i heard a bubble gum explosion like noice from the case, and i notice that two capacitor caps, (two of those 3 between the processor socket and the mainboard power cable) were semiopened , and over the videocard was some strange liquid which i bet came from the inside capacitors, anyway, the board is working fine, as it was after the noice, this issue happened 2 days ago, the board as i say is working fine, stable, i did some benchmarks gaming and everything seems ok....my question is....should i take care of this issue since my boards is still working fine?? should i send the board to change the capacitors or something like that??, its was just two days ago but i guess these capacitors should be important and maybe, future problems may come from this..just suggest me what to do if you think its a serious problem, thank you. i really can not wait until the board stop working.

    Hi justlooking,
    While it would be nice to know why the capacitors failed, it is probably more practical to just accept that they have failed, and should be replaced. Hopefully, the mobo will then have a long and productive life  
    I guess the failure could be due to a design error, a manufacturing error, or an inherent defect in the component (or possibly a combination of the above).
    By design error, I mean that one or more of the chosen capacitor's characteristics was inadequate for the operating conditions (for example, ripple current is too high), or the capacitor is operating close to its specified limit.
    Manufacturing faults could include inserting the capacitor the wrong way round (although that should show up when the mobo is first powered up in testing), or the wrong capacitor type was loaded (e.g. wrong capacitance or voltage rating), or even that Purchasing decided to get Brand X capacitor rather than the originally specified Brand Y because it was 1% cheaper, but didn't realise that the ESR was 10% higher, say.
    If it turns out that this capacitor failure was an isolated incident, then it is more likely that it was a defective, or at least marginal, component. Electrolytic capacitors are probably the least reliable class of passive components, and their characteristics can change over time. I have read of TV service technicians who routinely change any low value electrolytics in a problem area of a faulty TV, because they know from experience that they can dry out, resulting in lower capacitance and higher ESR.
    In the world of servicing, where time is money, the object is to fix the problem as quickly and cheaply as possible. As an engineer, I know that if I tried to make a living from Servicing, I'd starve!. I'd spend too much time trying to work out why something failed, instead of recognising that you can usually cure fault X by replacing components A, B and C.
    Of course, it is possible that the capacitor failures were caused by a different component, which has over-stressed the capacitors. In this case, the replacement capacitors would also fail in time. However, it is probably easiest to replace the faulty capacitors in the first instance, and keep an eye on them for signs of impending failure (bulging ends). If the board is RMA'd, then I guess MSI will decide what the best course of action is.
    Cheers

  • PC Hardware Testing Utility.

    I need to identify an annoying intermittent fault. Does anyone recommend any
    free hardware testing utilities? I suspect a motherboard fault.

    On Thu 21 Mar 2013 12:53:07 PM CDT, Arthur wrote:
    Thank you - no capacitor or hard disk or memory problems.
    "malcolmlewis" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    On Wed 20 Mar 2013 08:50:24 AM CDT, Arthur wrote:
    I need to identify an annoying intermittent fault. Does anyone
    recommend any free hardware testing utilities? I suspect a motherboard
    fault.
    Hi
    For memory memtest86. Looked at the motherboard, not 'bulging
    capacitors'? Harddrive?
    Grab an openSUSE LiveCD and boot that up to run smart, memtest etc.
    http://software.opensuse.org/123/en
    Hi
    Did you try a live cd for awhile?
    Not heat related, cpu needs new thermal paste?
    Else your down to power supply.... or Motherboard replacement....
    Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890)
    openSUSE 12.3 (x86_64) Kernel 3.7.10-1.1-desktop
    up 11:18, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.06, 0.06
    CPU Intel® i5 CPU [email protected] | GPU Intel® Ironlake Mobile

  • Is it bad capacitors?

    My iMac had been having problems starting up for a week or so where there would be a few visual glitches (randomly colored squares etc.) on either the login or loading screen. Eventually it completely refused to start up normally. I though it was a hard drive problem at first so I bought a new one and have a clean install of OSX on it. This didn't solve my problem. It continues to hang on the blue screen and only boots up in safe mode. I've looked at the capacitors and only a few seem to have the metallic top pushing slightly outward and honestly they were like this years ago when I upgraded the ram on the system.
    I've reset the pram, repaired the permissions and drive already to no avail. So I guess I'd like to know if it's something a little simpler to repair than the capacitors haha.

    Hi FebMoon and Welcome to Apple Discussions,
    where there would be a few visual glitches (randomly colored squares etc.) on either the login or loading screen
    It didn't freeze when this happened?
    I've looked at the capacitors and only a few seem to have the metallic top pushing slightly outward and honestly they were like this years ago when I upgraded the ram on the system.
    So the crucial info here is that the tops were "slightly" pushed up. Now they can look like that and be OK for a while. I've also seen others that were just barely bulged and tested absolutely dead. So as soon as you see that that must be addressed before anything else.
    DT&T services has been recommended on these boards before and have a good rep. One of my clients used them and was pleased.
    http://www.dttservice.com/imacg5.html
    Richard

  • 970a g46 capacitor

    Hi all, i have just received my 3rd rma motherboard. This one actually works. However i am running it out of the case to test it, and found a capacitor missing. It must have been knocked off before transit as i know it was not done by me. I have been ultra careful and have a spotless work area here, and the cap is neither here nor is it in the box or static resistant bag the mobo was in. I really need someone with one of these boards to tell me what the top of it reads.  I would post a picture here but cannot figure out how, so let me describe where it is. It is along the top of the board just above the cpu fan plug. Just to the left of the case screw hole there, just to the left of the ram slots. Please help?

    I know. First board worked okay, but hitchy n glitchy. Would run on overclock but not normal. Then shut off one day and wouldn't post. Rma. Second board no post. 3rd board is this one missing a cap. Im about ready to bag it and go with an asus board. This board powered up and passed diagnostic post card tests, so if the cap was there i would be in business.  Will probably rma one last time and if no good AGAIN, then asus. I wanted this board as i heard good things about it, and my first ine when running good did very well.

  • Cracked Electrolytic Capacitors

    Hi all,
    Hope there is some one who has fixed a simular problem.
    MSI Mainboard K7T Pro Ver:1
    This board worked fine for nearly 4 years.
    Problem started with no access to floppy drive, No sound and boot problems.
    Found 2 blown-up / cracked electrolytic capacitors 4700uF 6.3V near the cpu socket.
    Replaced capacitors with LOW ESR 4700uF 10V from Hitano.
    After starting up, no video output.
    Diagnostic LED 0 1 0 0 Initializing Keyboard Controller according manual.
    Next Diagnostic LED error in the list 0101 Testing VGA BIOS.
    A helpfull answer will be appreciated,
    Regard
    Wouter

    those suffered from 2 things
    bad caps...if you replace them its allways best to do them all
    and a voltage regulator that dies
    most never lasted any were near 4 years and are not a thing easily replaced
    to be honest in view of that i would just bin it im afraid

Maybe you are looking for