Capturing Render Times

I'm trying to measure the time it takes to render things like
circles, rectangles, text, images, ect. Here is a snippet of code
that creates random circles and adds them to a UIComponent.
var result:UIComponent = new UIComponent();
addChild(result);
// render time
var rdiff:Number = new Number();
// execution time
var ediff:Number = new Number();
var circle:Sprite = new Sprite();
// counter
var i:int = 0;
// time place holders
var before:Number = new Number();
var after:Number = new Number();
while(i < rows) {
// Create x many random circles
before = new Date().time;
circle.graphics.beginFill(Math.random() * 0xFFFFFF,1);
var rnd:int = Math.round(Math.random() * (300)) + 0;
var rnd2:int = Math.round(Math.random() * (300)) + 0;
circle.graphics.drawCircle(rnd,rnd2,50);
circle.graphics.endFill();
after = new Date().time;
ediff += (after - before);
// Display x many circles
before = new Date().time;
result.addChild(circle);
after = new Date().time;
rdiff = rdiff + (after - before);
i = i + 1;
Would this be the correct way of measuring the render time?
Am i way off or silly?

So I have been measuring the render time as the time it takes
to go through addChild(). Here is what I found about how addChild()
works. Which of these would or would not be related to the render
time?
1. Container.addChild(b);
Flex performs the following actions:
a. Sets the parent property for the component to reference
its parent
container.
b. Computes the style settings for the component.
c. Dispatches the preinitialize event on the component.
d. Calls the component’s createChildren() method.
e. Calls the invalidateProperties(), invalidateSize(), and
invalidateDisplayList() methods to trigger later calls to the
commitProperties(), measure(), or updateDisplayList() methods
during the
next render event.
The only exception to this rule is that Flex does not call
the measure()
method when the user sets the height and width of the
component.
f. Dispatches the initialize event on the component. At this
time, all of
the component’s children are initialized, but the
component was not sized
or processed for layout. You can use this event to perform
additional
processing of the component before it is laid out.
g. Dispatches the childAdd event on the parent container.
h. Dispatches the initialize event on the parent container.
2. During the next render event, Flex performs the following
actions:
a. Calls the component’s commitProperties() method.
b. Calls the component’s measure() method.
c. Calls the component’s layoutChrome() method.
d. Calls the component’s updateDisplayList() method.
e. Dispatches the updateComplete event on the component.
3. Flex dispatches additional render events if the
commitProperties(),
measure(), or updateDisplayList() methods call the
invalidateProperties(),
invalidateSize(), or invalidateDisplayList() methods.
4. After the last render event occurs, Flex performs the
following actions:
a. Makes the component visible by setting the visible
property to true.
b. Dispatches the creationComplete event on the component.
The component
is sized and processed for layout. This event is only
dispatched once when
the component is created.
c. Dispatches the updateComplete event on the component. Flex
dispatches
additional updateComplete events whenever the layout,
position, size, or
other visual characteristic of the component changes and the
component is
updated for display.
Most of the work for configuring a component occurs when you
add the
component to a container by using the addChild() method. That
is because
until you add the component to a container, Flex cannot
determine its
size, set inheriting style properties, or draw it on the
screen.

Similar Messages

  • Capturing total time for a report..

    Hi all..
    I have a query. Is there a way to capture total time spent to show a report on browser
    If I understand the way it works in OBIEE
    Browser -Presentation Services -- HTTP Request or Response (This we can see by increasing sawlog config file to see more details in sawlog0.)
    Presentation services - BI Server (By Usage Tracking S_NQ_* tables, it gives response time, elapsed time and such statstics)
    BI Server - DB ( The query running time also captured in usage tracking table)
    My understanding is on whole when Presentation services pass the request to BI Server..and when it BI server returns the data to Presentation services..
    There shoud some COMMON PARAMETER to match the request sent and received ..Mapping the requests...
    Is there a way to get that parameter/variable/sytem variable..so that I can accomplish objective of tracking total time spend for a request..
    I could increase saw log and see there is no common parameter that I could match from Sawlog to NQQuery Log, but no luck
    Can anybody help here to find someway? any pointers?
    Thanks in advance..

    There is no parameter that captures the browser rendering time of the report. In the manage sessions if you check the report run time stats you should be able to find the elapsed time, db connect time and compilation time
    To find a more accurate time to render the report and the time when it has become active you can check that information Under Manage sessions in the RPD. That will give the start time and report active time which is the time at which the report is active.
    If you closely monitor this time in the sessions will be a little higher than the time present in the view logs elapsed time which includes the browser rendering time as well because it gives the report active time on it.
    Hope it will be helpful
    thanks
    prash

  • Capturing the time for rendering the JSFscreen.

    I have a JSF application running on WAS6.1. We have some performance issues.
    The JSF rendering is taking long time to render the page. All the database operation ie querying the database and leaving the prerender method is happening so fast.
    So how can we capture the time for the JSF components to render the page. Is there any way to do that?

    i tried to implement the phase listener.But i’m getting an error message in the JSP saying
    JSPG0046E: Unable to locate tagfile for tag phaseListener
    My action getting triggered on click of a tab. So in my JSP page I mentioned as
    <ui:tab action="#{reportsView.kpiRanking_action}" binding="#{reportsView.kpiRankingStore}"
    id false*/;&#xa;openPreloadWindow(); &#xa;document.getElementById("form1:periodTypeDropDown")[2].selected = true;&#xa;savePeriodType();"
    style="height: 25px; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle; width: 91px;cursor: pointer;" text="Store KPI Ranking">
    <f:phaseListener binding="#{reportsView.phaseListenerImpl}" type="com.capricorn.sckpi.PhaseListenerImpl"/>
    <ui:panelLayout binding="#{reportsView.layoutPanel30}" id="layoutPanel30" style="height: 335px; width: 100%; overflow-y: auto;">
    <ui:table augmentTitle="false" binding="#{reportsView.storeWithinDistrictTableStore}"
    id="storeWithinDistrictTableStore"
    style="height: 100%; left: 0px; top: 0px; position: relative; width: 100%" title="KPI Ranking">
    <ui:tableRowGroup binding="#{reportsView.storeWithinDistrictRowGroupStore}"
    id="storeWithinDistrictRowGroupStore" sourceData="#{reportsView.defaultTableDataProvider}" sourceVar="currentRow"/>
    </ui:table>
    <ui:table augmentTitle="false" binding="#{reportsView.storeWithinDistrictTableStore1}"
    id="storeWithinDistrictTableStore1"
    style="height: 100%; left: 0px; top: 0px; position: relative; width: 100%" title="YTD Ranking">
    <ui:tableRowGroup binding="#{reportsView.storeWithinDistrictRowGroupStore1}"
    id="storeWithinDistrictRowGroupStore1" sourceData="#{reportsView.defaultTableDataProvider}" sourceVar="currentRow"/>
    </ui:table>
    </ui:panelLayout>
    </ui:tab>
    My header for JSP is
    <jsp:root version="1.2" xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" xmlns:ui="http://www.sun.com/web/ui">
    <jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" pageEncoding="UTF-8"/>
    Please help.

  • EX cam footage render time?

    I have EX1 footage captured as EDcamEX.
    I placed it in a pro res time as recommended for faster renders.
    The footage was an event- low light. The gain was high.
    I applied a BCC Denoise filter.
    The filter cleaned it up nice but,
    The timeline is about 90 minutes and The render out is taking 11 hours (?)
    Is this render time correct for this type of filter on this length timeline?

    Hi -
    Couple of things:
    1) When dealing with XDCam and Ex footage, I routinely get very long estimates for renders that rapidly drop as the render progresses.
    2) I am not sure what advantage you got by editing the Sequence with the Codec set differently from the source. I routinely edit Ex footage on sequences that have the same codec (XDCAM EX 1080p30) and the renders, while not zippy, are not outrageously long. If you think about it, now FCP has to convert all the footage used in the sequence to Pro Res as well as rendering any effects or transitions. This is probably quite CPU intensive.
    Don't know if you want to consider this, but you might want to create a new sequence that has the same codec and frame size and frame rate as you source material, and copy all the clips from your ProRes Sequence and paste them to the new sequence and try a render there.
    Hope this helps.

  • Audio only render time takes forever??? not usually

    Usually the rendering of a clip audio takes moments, then whereever I move it on the timeline it doesnt require re- rendering time. but today thats not the case. Long render time, and if I move the clip, I must re- render it again??? help! I bought 2 more gigs of ram. It also gave me a general error, and an "out of memory" once. Maybe its just a setting hopefully. tried it both on a version of 4.1 and HD 4.5 same issue. Also cant capture straight from my camera without it stuttering, and then audio going out of sync.

    Hi, FCP 4.5 is not compatible with OS 10.4.9 -- you will need to downgrade to 10.4.8 or lower (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305284)
    Also, are you sure the movie format your rendering is a quicktime file and not .dv/avi/etc. I've run into those same errors when working with other formats that are not native quicktime.

  • Measuring preview and file render times

    Does anyone know how I can accurately measure preview and file render times other than a stop watch? I know the Premiere Pro benchmark does this, but I'm trying to figure out the gains I will get with different settings for my own projects and wanted to know if there is any way to accurately capture this information or find it somewhere within the software.

    There's no data base you can go to for this info.  You really just need to watch the screen.
    Run short tests - 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes.  That way you're not waiting forever for an export to finish.

  • PNGs + Video Thumbnails = HUGE render times

    Dear Users,
    I've always used Tiffs before as my export option from Photoshop, but just learned recently that I should be using PNGs. However, now when I use those PNGs in a timeline with custom sized video thumbnails, the render times are LONG. I'm used to rendering cause I'm on a 1st generation 17" MBP, but I'm talking an hour to render a 24-second sequence. The timeline consists of 5 PNG layers and 5 240x180 (Multimedia Small 4:3) 29.97 videos using DV/DVCPRO - NTSC as the Compressor and quality set to 50%. When I drop one of the video files into a new timeline, FCP6 asks me if I want to conform the timeline to meet the clip settings, and I choose yes, but as soon as I put any of the PNGs over the video, I get the orange Unlimited render bar. Any ideas as far as what's causing the Long times beside me being on a laptop? I figure it's gotta be something I'm doing wrong, just like I wasn't using PNGs before. This is for a DVD's Scene selection menu, hence the small videos acting as previews of each scene.
    Thank you all,
    -Brian

    Found the problem. The key was where I said "from Motion." The movie came in with Animation as the compressor type, so when I dropped it onto a new timeline, FCP asked me if I wanted to conform the sequence to match the clip, and when I chose OK, it changed the video rendering from YUV to RGB and the compressor from DV/DVCPRO to Animation. Now for the science of what I found and who I tested it all: PSD = 18 layers, 2.4MB TIF = "layered" Tif, 2.5MB PNG = 540KB
    In a brand new timeline, the video and .psd were Unlimited and need rendering to play back smoothly. The tif and png were both fine to play back.
    With the conformed timeline settings, the video then played fine, but the psd, tif, and png were all red "Needs Render."
    Now as for the rendering itself, the video was a 7 second, 14 frame Animation clip. Still images were placed 3 seconds from the end of the video then rendered. PSD = 18 seconds, TIF = 5 seconds, PNG = 5 seconds to render.
    • Both the TIF and PNG could be freely moved around, including over the whole video without requiring another render. The .psd would loose it's render when layered over the video.
    In a second brand new NTSC timeline, video captured from DVCAM tape was fine, along with the tif and png again. The psd yet again had the orange render bar even when layered over nothing.
    So there's my unscientific tests. I've hated working with the PSDs natively, and those numbers show why. I'll continue to use PNGs because they're both small file sized, nice quality, and fast rendering.
    As for my original problem, it was the Animation compression that was causing the problems.
    What do you all do for your Photoshop workflows?
    -Brian

  • Slow render time, can anyone help?

    I have recently installed some plugins and since it seems that render times are really slow. After every tweak of a filter I'm having to re-render for playback.
    I have a one minute clip in the timeline for example, I add a vignette from my Magicbullet Plugin, nothing more and it takes 4 mins to render! My timeline is set to DV-PAL Anamorphic and my video captured as the same.
    Any more info required please ask
    Many thanks

    Your RT settings don't improve final render times, but they may improve your editing experience by allowing better playback of effects without having to render your timeline. You should experiment with the settings in the sequence to see what works best for your particular setting. Generally, if you choose Unlimited RT you'll get more real time playback, and therefore won't have to render as often while editing. But you'll likely experience more dropped frames during your sequence playback. You still have to render your final output though.
    Have a read of the manual and experiment. There are no hard and fast rules for settings as every system is different. Obviously, the more you tax your system the less it's able to play back in real time.
    Best of luck.

  • Final Cut Studio 2 Render Times Exponetianlly  Greater

    Used to have Final Cut Studio, loved it, render times were very reasonable, I upgraded 2 weeks ago to Final Cut Studio 2 and the render times are not outrageous. What used to take 5-10 minutes to render is 3 hours or so. Am I missing something?

    Everyone who is experiencing this should report it to FCP Feedback. You can find that in the Final Cut Pro menu within FCP, or here:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/finalcutpro.html

  • Slow render times with large jpegs - complete system lag

    In a project i'm working on I have two large jpegs with a small zoom scaling effect. Going from 100 to 103 percent.
    I've noticed that both Adobe Media Encoder and Premiere Pro experience a heavy slow down in render time as soon as the jpegs have to be rendered.
    Not only does the render speed almost come to a halt, the complete system lags very heavy, even the mouse cursor won't respond well.
    This happens when i have GPU acceleration enabled and when i do a 2 pass H264 encoding.
    When I have the GPU acceleration disabled the render goes very smooth, and doesn't seem to slow down...
    The jpeg is 4023  x 2677, and 6,97 MB large.
    Scaling the jpeg down to about 1920x1080 in Photoshop and put that one in the timeline made the render go a lot faster.
    I understand that a large picture takes a bit more time to be rendered, but we're talking about a 10minute render whit the large jpeg file and  a 2 minute render with the jpeg resized.
    The total time of the two jpegs in the video is 5 seconds in a 3 minutes video.
    So, that made me think that the render times are exponentially long.
    In the timeline everything runs really smooth.
    Is this considered normal, I can't remember having such big differences in CS5. It's not a major thing, but I wanted to share anyway.
    My system:
    Premiere Pro CC (latest)
    i7 4930K
    32 GB RAM
    2xGTX480
    Footage and project on a Raid0 disk
    Previews/Cache on a Raid0 disk
    System and Premiere on SSD
    Render to a single 7200 rpm drive.

    >wanted to share
    Yes... known issue... I think some of the below is about P-Elements, but the same ideas
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -HiRes Pictures to DVD http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1187937?tstart=0
    -PPro Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967

  • Capture Date/Time - clobbered by LR 1.1

    Oh No!
    It appears that LR 1.1 has clobbered the Capture Date/Time after writing out the metadata.
    To try to be clearer, I've been using Elements 5.0 which organizes my photos (all jpg) by date. The date the photo was taken (which is also the date the file was created) are important to me. Those fields are respected by other Adobe products (Album, Elements 5.0 and Bridge CS2). Somehow LR 1.1 treats this date differently and with less importance than other Adobe and non-Adobe applications.
    I am not too concerned about the date that the metadata was changed, which LR shows. I want to see the date the picture was taken.
    The only way I managed to see that in LR was to customize the display using
    Jeffrey's Lightroom Metadata Viewer Preset Builder (for Lightroom 1.1). (Why I had to use a 3rd party add template creator to see the Capture Date/Time I don't know - it should be right there in LR - but leave that aside for the moment) .
    Anyhow, I manipulate the metadata by adding keywords and then tell LR to write that to the files. In this process the creation date/time vanished on a number of photos. The only way I could get it back was to use a backup of the original files (losing keywords and other data in the process)or to use Exifier to set the date/time, remove the collection from LR and reimport.
    Something as important as the date and time the photo was taken (file creation) is a key bit of data that should be readily available and visible in the metadata display and should not be clobbered or lost when writing out metadata to the files. I see there are other complaints about this and some expressing horror that Adobe didn't fix it in LR 1.1.
    My point is simple - for my purposes I cannot fully utilize LR 1.1 if the Creation Date/Time cannot be readily seen, or is in danger of being lost, I would have to use other software.
    Geeze, and I was beginning to get comfortable with LR...
    Maybe the good folks at Adobe have some comment and might be able to rectify this?
    In the alternative, is there something I'm missing about the way Capture Date/Time is supposed to be treated by LR users?
    Advice and pointers would be appreciated.

    Christopher wrote:
    "I hear ya, but if someone could just say, this is how dates are supposed to work ... that would be helpful. In particular, what fields or fields does the Metadata Browser use to sort an image into a date bin? If I knew that, I might be able to determine why so many of my images are put into the Unknown Date heading."
    Here we go:
    1. None DateTime tag defined in exif (or DateTime tags corrupted)
    -in Metadata Browser (left panel) Date will be seen as Unknown Date.
    -Thumbnail show no DateTime value,
    -in Matadata (right) panel, there will be no DateTime caption visible
    2. Only ModifyDate defined in exif
    -in Matadata Browser value of ModifyDate will be shown,
    -Thumbnail show no DateTime value,
    -in Matadata panel, ModifyDate will be shown as Time
    3. Only CreateDate defined in exif
    -in Metadata Browser value of CreateDate will be shown,
    -Thumbnail show no DateTime value,
    -in Metadata panel, CreateDate will be shown as DateTimeDigitized
    4. Only DateTimeOriginal defined in exif
    -in Metadata Browser value of DateTimeOriginal will be shown,
    -Thumbnail shows value of DateTimeOriginal,
    -in Metadata panel, DateTimeOriginal will be shown as Capture Time
    +in Medatada panel, DateTimeOriginal will be shown as Time
    5. All three DateTime values defined in exif
    -in Metadata Browser value of DateTimeOriginal will be shown,
    -Thumbnail shows value of DateTimeOriginal,
    -Metadata panel shows CreateDate as DateTimeDigitized,
    +Metadata panel shows DateTimeOriginal as CaptureTime,
    +Metadata panel shows ModifyDate as Time
    That's it. Now... why are we confused in LR when speaking of DateTime?
    In Metadata Browser any of exif's DateTime value can be shown. That is, looking at this panel only, we never know what Date is being used! Anyway, DateTimeOriginal has priority: if DateTimeOriginal exist, it will be used for Metadata Browser -otherwise any other existing exif DateTime tag will be used.
    But if only DateTimeOriginal is missing (so both, CreateDate and ModifyDate exist), then CreateDate has priority over ModifyDate: CreateDate will be shown.
    Priority in short: DateTimeOriginal, CreateDate, ModifyDate.
    Thumbnails: only if DateTimeOriginal exists, thumbnail will contain DateTime value -otherwise thumbnail's DateTime will be blank.
    Sorting of thumbnails per CaptureTime (hence by exif DateTimeOriginal) is another story and can be quite confusing at first sight... because DateTime priorities seems to be the same as for Metadata Browser:
    If exif DateTimeOriginal exist (=CaptureTime in LR), then this value will be used for sorting. But if this value is missing, LR will try to use exif CreateDate and if this is missing too, ModifyDate will be used. OK, there's some logic... except, why I'm repeating "if this tag is missing..."?
    Because when you modify/rewrite some image, then some tool may damage DateTime in exif -remember: damaged DateTime tag is the same as tag doesn't exist!
    In short: if there's exif DateTime corruption involved, you can't be sure which of three DateTime tags is being used for sorting. For some images DateTimeOriginal will be used, for those that are missing that tag, CreateDate will be used instead.
    Images missing exif DateTime tags (or these are corrupted), will be shown as first (sort A-Z).
    Bogdan

  • Looong render times with motion templates

    I've been a big advocate for FCPX as there are a lot of great features but there are some things that are just killing me, no.1 render time.
    I'm working on some simple presentation edits using motion templates I have built in motion 5 and published to fcpx. The templates all consist of a single dropbox for video with a type field for test messages next to it. These are against a flat white rectangle used to reflect (similar to the coverflow but against a white background) and a subtle camera sweep has been added so it slowly turns from one side to the other by 30 degrees. Each of these is 10 seconds long.
    I chop up my imported movie on the timeline (untouched by grade/fx/retiming) and add the template to each of the chopped clips. I then select each applied template in the timeline and use the video well to select the clip below it for the dropzone. I add my text. That's all good. I now have a timeline approx 3 minutes long consisting of these motion graphics templates.
    Now, if I chose to either render or export a QT with timeline settings, estimated time is 8 - 9 hrs (I have tried both) I left a 3:30 project exporting last night at 11:45. It finished at 9:00AM.
    That is just unacceptable. It is irritating because the functionality of building the sequences in FCPX far outweighs what FCP 7 is capable of but the so-called "renderless" abilities of FCPX
    are making life ****.
    I use Event Manager X to turn off everything I am not using except the individual project. I have reset preferences in Preference Manager to see if that helps. I have purged using terminal. I have my clips on an external firewire 800 HD. I have no other software running. I accept I need a more powerful Mac - I'm using a 2009 3 Ghz Intel Core Duo iMac with 6gig ram using Lion 10.7.2 and FCPX 10.0.2 but 9 hours for a 3:30 clip?
    Any suggestions for where I can cut down on render time are appreciated. The source clip for the video for the dropzones and the final exported presentation movie are HD ProRes.
    Cheers

    The situation you describe does not seem normal. It should not take nearly that long to render and export your 3:30 movie. Considering that your mac is not one of the most recent vintage, and your are editing in full HD, one could expect it to take a bit of time, but nothing like this.
    In the way of troubleshooting, you could try and export just one of these 10 second segments.
    I have no way of knowing for sure, but I guess that it might export in a much more reasonable amount of time.
    I suspect that memory may be running scarce, which, as has been repeatedly mentioned in these fora, is a problem affecting many of us using FCP X under Lion. You mentioned you used "purge" in the Terminal, but in such a long render you might have had to do it repeatedly...

  • Macbook Pro 2012 vs Retina Render time difference

    Just purchased the 13-inch: 2.9GHz dual-core Intel Core i7 regular macbook pro.
    With my budget of a $1700, should I get the 13-inch: 2.6GHz with Retina display Intel Core i5
    instead for render work like After Effects? how big of a difference is render time??

    Just purchased the 13-inch: 2.9GHz dual-core Intel Core i7 regular macbook pro.
    With my budget of a $1700, should I get the 13-inch: 2.6GHz with Retina display Intel Core i5
    instead for render work like After Effects? how big of a difference is render time??

  • Capture travel time expenses and working hours spent on the service call

    Hi Experts,
    I have One Year AMC contract with my customer.Under AMC he called me for 10 times.I need to
    Capture travel time expenses and working hours spent on all the service call, Non of them will be billed to the customer.
    This is just for our internal tracking.this particular data will reside within the office premises.
    Explain how efficiently we can track this particular requirement in SAP Business One
    Regards,
    Vikram

    Hi Vikram
    You will notice on the item master records that there is a field called Item Type. The options are Item, Labor and Travel. In order for the service module to recognize the expense or charge type, either Labor or Travel must be select. Create a service item (untick inventory item) and choose the Item Type as Labor or Travel. When you now create a Delivery/Invoice from the expenses section of the service call, it will identify and warn you if you charge the customer, as this would be defined in your service contract template as non billable charges. You can still create a Delivery for the charges and put quantities and values on the Delivery document. In this case you are not going to invoice the customer for the charges, so you can "Close" the Delivery. Just be aware that closing the Delivery will post the value to an offset account defined in the Account Determination.
    The benefit of this approach is that the Delivery will post a debit and credit in your G/L that will "accrue" what the costs are of servicing the customer. My suggestion would be to set the account determination for the Labor/Travel item(s) to item level and define the Revenue/Expense accounts to specific G/L accounts.
    Let me know if you need more information or assistance with the above.
    Kind regards
    Peter Juby

  • Render time Issues with 5.0 project in CC 12.1

    This is actually a copy of a post I had in a different discussion entitled "render time" but this now
    I did some extensive testing to try and see why my render times in CC were so much slower that 5.5 and I found some very interesting results.
    The original project was created in 5.0 and opened in 5.5 and rendered, it contained video footage and graphics. When it was render in 5.5 it rendered in 4:27. When I opened it in 12.1 and rendered it was 18:00. I then started turning off layers and my render times shot up. basically layer 12 had two animated masks on colored solid. With this off it took 8:30
    I then imported the project into 12.1 and saved it, reopened it and with layer 12 off it took 5:11. So importing and saving the project made a difference. Now I recreated layer 12 in 12.1 from scratch and turned it on and my rendered time was 6:50.
    So there is something going on with projects being converted from earlier versions - Now to really test this theory I would need to recreate the project from scratch and compare to the 5.5 times.
    To further test this we did the same sort of testing with a different comp and found similar results - the render times were different if it was imported vs. just opened. But the big thing we found with this comp was a layer where we were moving large stills with some z space. It looks like the 3d from 5.0 was causing a major slow down in CC on layers that has AE 3d applied.
    I think the major take away is if your comp was created in 5.0 and you need to modify it, then make changes in 5.5 or 5.0 or be prepared to recreate any layers with more than simple key frames.
    Just to also answer some other questions - in rendering to prores vs. animation or dvcprohd the times were almost the same. The animation was slightly longer but that makes sense cause the file was much bigger.
    I also found that with 32 gigs of ram my magic number was 11 reserved for other apps ...
    Hope someone can jump in and add some light to this
    This was all done on a 2010 mac pro 2.66 w 12 cores 36 megs ram running 10.8.4 - I have 5.5 and CC and the 12. 1 updates are installed and the video card is an NVidia 575. Mulit threading was on and in 5.5 - 9 Megs is reserved and in 12.1 - 10 is reserved

    I've experienced similar problem with Java Web Start twice.
    Also using JRE version 1.5.0_06 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM and Browser Internet Explorer 6.0.2800.1106 on Windows XP (Problem was the same with Java 1.4.2)
    My application was signed and launched via JNLP. The security warning popup was shown in the windows taskbar, but it was hidden. Using maximize in the taskmanager, I was able to see the dialog but it was blank. The problem was persistent, although I did not try as many times as 20-30 :-)
    On both occations the problem occured on multi (3) screen systems, which I suspected to be the problem (Java has historically had some issues regarding multi screen systems), but now I'm not so sure.
    Did you find a solution / cause?

Maybe you are looking for

  • IMac won't go past apple screen, keyboard won't connect

    I cannot get my iMac to boot up past the apple screen with the loading circle. I would try booting up while holding the command and R keys or those other options, but my computer stopped working the one time my keyboard died and I had to change the b

  • Isqlplussvc.exe encountered a problem and needed to close.

    Does anyone have any information on fixing this error. It is killing me. The situation is: I am running windows xp pro sp2 on a AMD 64bit box. It is 32bit windows. It has 1GB of RAM and 40 GB of hd. the release I am using is Oracle 10.2.01 db and cli

  • How to aggregate data?

    Hi, I found an interface can only map columns to columns. If I want to aggregate the source before loading to target, how to do it? Thanks.

  • Who are the people with lumia 620 waiting for up...

    Eagerly waiting for windows 8.1 update on Lumia 620, black update is awesome, but after reading about the,features of 8.1, anxious about the update as quick as possible, esp the cortona, icons as per wish,

  • Got an error message in German when setting up iCloud

    Got the following message during setup of the iCloud control panel on my PC running Windows 7:  Der automatische Refresh konnte nicht gestartet werden