Catalyst 4506 12.2(25)EWA2 issue's

We have a customer who has updated the IOS on a pair of 4506's from 12.2(20)EWA TO 12.2(25)EWA2. He is experiencing intermittant connectivity issue's which require a reboot to resolve. I cannot find any issue's in the Software Advisor Has anyone experienced issues with this upgrade.

I have variuos show tech outputs from the switch's, but i am having problems using the output interpreter at this time. Can i send them to you ?

Similar Messages

Monitoring Cisco Catalyst 4506

Hello
I am looking Cisco SNMP MIB or some Nagios plugin that allow to monitoring PoE status on Cisco Catalyst 4506 modules and check Led indicator status simmilar I can do it by coomand "show enviroment "
Module 2 Status Led Color : Green PoE Led Color: Orange
Module 3 Status Led Color : Green PoE Led Color : Green
Thank you very much

Hi jon.marshall,
Thanks for you reply. I'll explain how the traffic flows:
1. Client boot up workstation
2. After booting up, client obtain IP addressing through DHCP service from a remote DHCP server using gateway of VLAN210 (172.18.212.1)
3. IP addressing issued to client (for e.g 172.18.212.128) and open web browser (HTTP) using a proxy (proxy.skynet.gov) with a DNS setting of skynet.gov.
4. Next hop is a Juniper Enforcer (a.k.a firewall) with IP address 172.18.221.234 (Enforcer 1 - Master) and 172.18.221.235 (Enforcer 2 - Backup) which have a policy rule stating that the client range of 172.18.212.0 to 172.18.212.255 wanting to contact the proxy (proxy.skynet.gov), the next hop would be the Juniper UAC Host checker (with IP address of 172.18.223.254).
Note: There are 2x physical Junpier Enforcer and only 1x Juniper Host Checker
5. Juniper UAC Host Checker checks client workstation to ensure that minimum requirements are met before allowing client to go to internet
6. Once clients pass the Juniper UAC Host Checker, traffic to the internet is then allowed.
7. Clients surf the internet.
8. End
To answer your questions:
i. The UAC is not on the same subnet however, all routing is done on the Cisco Catalyst 4506 and the UAC and VLAN are all on the 4506 too.
ii. I'm not sure if the Juniper UAC is the one that makes all Http request of VLAN210 (172.18.212.0 to 172.18.212.255) or it will let the client make its on Http request after it passes the host checker.
iii. Yes. I have 2x Cisco Catalyst 4506 and they are connected to each other through HSRP
iv. The proxy (proxy.skynet.gov) is configured on the clients browser.
Note: Is the DNS name of the proxy server, NOT the IP address of the proxy server.
I hope the above provided information is sufficient for you reference to provide me the actual syntax for my requirement. Thanks.
Cheers!!!

Catalyst 4506 and Modules in Pwr Over state

Hello,
First of all, my excuses for my bad english.
I am experiencing a problem with a Cisco Catalyst 4506.
The switch is filled with 48 port PoE blades (WS-X4248-RJ45V).
The error we receive is:
Sept 5 15:40:12: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sept 5 16:37:04: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sept 5 16:37:04: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
According to the Cisco website:
Explanation
This message indicates that the measured PoE is at least 50 w higher than the configured value. The switch has either misconfigured PoE or an unauthorized powered device that is connected to the switch and is drawing a lot of PoE.
Out put for the commands sh power details and sh module all are attached.
The switch has no PoE devices on the specific blade.
Atleast not that we know.
Does any one know some other solution?
Thanks in advance.
Martijn Groenleer

Well, blade six went offline on the first row of the log i posted earlier.
The problem is, the log doesn't mention in the message which module went offline.
About the 'efficiency' i noticed this also, what could be causing this? Power supplies are already replaced. PoE is on default settings currently.
A full log related to these power over warnings:
Aug 30 23:27:00: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Aug 30 23:39:34: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Aug 30 23:39:34: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 3 08:45:46: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 3 08:57:49: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 3 08:57:49: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 4 01:53:04: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 4 02:23:16: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 4 02:23:16: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 4 16:10:58: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 4 17:20:23: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 4 17:20:23: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 4 17:58:14: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 4 18:09:37: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 4 18:09:37: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 4 19:13:15: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 4 19:56:11: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 4 19:56:11: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 5 09:02:16: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 5 09:10:46: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 5 09:10:46: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online
Sep 5 15:40:12: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Inline power exceeds threshold: Module status changed to 'Pwr Over'
Sep 5 16:37:04: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-INLINEPOWEROK: Inline power within limits: Module status changed to 'Ok'
Sep 5 16:37:04: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 6 (WS-X4248-RJ45V S/N: JAB080609GN Hw: 2.0) is online

Trying to interconnect Catalyst 4506 (IOS) & Catalyst 6509 (CatOS) using FS

Hey all,
I'm currently having a problem interconnecting a Catalyst 4506 using IOS and a Catalyst 6509 using CatOS via FSO. The FSO is all setup and they show that they are talking but when we plug the fiber optic cables into the switches, we get a notconnect status on the switches. The link lights on both switches don't light up either. I have configured both sides as follows
6509 (the Gigabit Port is 2/6):
set port negotiation 2/6 disable
set trunk 2/6 nonegotiate dot1q 1-1005,1025-4094
4506 (the Gigabit Port is 1/1):
interface GigabitEthernet 1/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed nonegotiate
We were told by the FSO company that both ends must turn off negotiation in order for it to work. On the end with the Catalyst 6509, I have tried plugging another known working fiber optic line into the 2/6 port and the link light lights up so we know that the port isn't broken. Any ideas? I am lost.
Background:
We currently have a T1 line that serves as a point to point between the two buildings. We were trying to get rid of it and go with Free Space Optics (FSO) to increase bandwidth between the two buildings. We have 5 VLANs on each side (on the 4506 side, Vlans 110, 120, 132, 140, & 104 and on the 6509 side, Vlan 10, 20, 32, 40, 4) and the point to point is on the 200 network to interconnect the switches.

Hie David,
Just to start with are we sure that Rx of one switch terminates on Tx of other and vice versa. The fiber cable which is plugged in the trnasmitter of one switch must go to the receiver of another switch. You can just try swapping the TX and RX points at one switch.
I doubt this because as you have said even the link light is not coming up.

Wccp catalyst 4506

Hi..
I have been trying to configure wccp on catalyst 4506 switches running VSS but unable to complete setup config. I need your help in configuring wccp.
i want ports www/https to be redirected to proxy server. And want to enable wccp on vlan interface. Pls help me in configuring it. Also any config example will be really helpful and appreciated.

Your switch is crashing due to multibit ECC errors. Upgrade your ROMMON to 12.1(20r)EW2. You might want to also upgrade IOS to 12.2(18)EW4
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCed25996
You can download it from
http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/lan/cat4000.shtml

CiscoView 5.3 and Catalyst 4506 issues.

Hi,
I cannot display on CiscoView 5.3 the Cat4506 device.
So, when i m trying to access to this equipement by IP address, i've got a warning message "Device package not installed"
I was checking in the device package installed in my CiscoWorks 6.1 and i found that it is already installed.
Any comments ??
Can you tell me which device package i need to display this device on CiscoView 5.3
Thanks for your response.

I have the same message with this package Cat4000IOS-14.0 , it seems that one should be updated;
But if the version 50 has the same message, it seems to be something else.

Catalyst 4507R plus E Switch Discovery Issue

Hi,
I am having issues doing automatic discovery for Cisco Catalyst 4507R plus E Switch IOS 12.2(54)SG, I am using IP ping sweep to discover devices on my network.
When i first setup LMS4.0 with few devices on the network, i discover the C4507 without a problem together with other devices i have on the network but for some reasons now its failing to discover C4507. I have large numbers of WS-C3560X and C4507 on the network, WS-C3560X always discovered just fine.
I tried to use SolarWinds network device monitor I installed on the server to check if there's any SNMP or connectivity issues. I can discover C4507 using Solarwinds without a problem, so im suspecting it could be LMS configuration issue.
Is there any special settings I need to tweak to make this working?

A newer version of IOS should generally be fine.
It's generally the SNMP sysObjectID that LSM keys into. As noted in the table you cited, it should be 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1286 for the 4507R+E.

Business catalyst on dreamweaver cs6 for windows8 issues

Hello everyone.
I am having some problems whith my business catalyst panel in dreamweaver cs6 for windosw8.This is not the first time i have this issue.
The panel doesnt open wen i click the loggin button as you can see in this video here:http://screencast.com/t/EMaCoMdxQ ,and it has nothing to do whith my bc payed subscription because if i reinstall dreamweaver i know its going to work again whith all the trial modules and everything, cause i did it before.
Before i reinstalled dreamweaver and sometimes it opened and sometimes it didnt.
Is there a fix for this issue.My dreamweaver is the 12.0.something and yesterday i updated it.i also tryed in times before instaling the dreamweaver cs5 businesscatalyst plugin wich i downloaded at the adobe portal but it does nothing, i did this many times too and followed all the instructions step by step.It only works if i reinstall dreamweaver i guess.
Does anyone also has this issue on theyr dreamweaver cs6 12.0 for windows?
,if so how do you fix this?

This does not work for me i keep getting "an FTP errror occured- cannot make connection to host" I have tried signing in the way the previous people suggested but to no avail. I have a paid creative cloud subscription. I am in Trinidad and Tobago. I am not sure that is an issue. I also connected succesfully to ftp://ftp.irs.gov using dreamweaver on adobe's the troubleshooting page. I was also successful connecting using cuteftp but when i connect to my businesscatalyst site...failure. hopefully i have made my plight clear.

VLAN trunking from Cisco Catalyst 3750 to Cisco SF300-48P issue and related

Hello expert,
I'm having difficulties to configure VLAN trunking between Cisco Catalyst 3750 switch with Cisco SF300-48P switch and my workstation unable to get any DHCP IP from our DHCP server via Cisco SF300-48P switch. Below is the snippet of configuration on both switches:
[Cisco Catalyst 3750 Switch]
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/45
description NCC-CC-1stFlr
no switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
no switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
spanning-tree portfast
[Cisco SF300-48P Switch]
interface fastethernet48
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 101-103
macro description switch
!next command is internal.
macro auto smartport dynamic_type switch
interface fastethernet29
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 103 tagged
switchport general pvid 103
Are these are correct? Kindly advice!
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Alex

Hi Alex,
for the trunk port on Catalyst on port GE 1/0/45, we need to enable the trunk and for on encapsulation dot1q because this catalyst model is ISL capable also and the SF300 working only with Dot1q Encapsultion
The configuration on catalyst should :
#config terminal
#interface Gi 1/0/45
# switchport encapsulation
#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
#switchport mode trunk
#switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
#spanning-tree portfast
For SF300 the port trunk it looks fine but for the port where the PC should receive an IP address
#interface fastethernet29
#switchport mode access
#switchport ccess vlan 103
Please let me know after this configuration
Thanks
Mehdi
Please rate or mark as answered to help other Cisco Customers

Catalyst 2948-GE-TX crossover cable issue

I am sure this is simple but I am not familiar with CISCO switch setups.
I am using this switch as a central switch for a 24 computer lab with a server. I want to connect it to our network using an exisiting wall jack. I have all my systems connected to the switch and finally added a crossover cable. Unfortunately, I have had no luck in getting it to let traffic in/out. Cannot ping the gateway from a machine inside the switch. I used a crossover cable into Port 1 with a wiring pattern as Gr/W - Gr - Or/W - Bl - Bl/W - Or - Br/W - Br on the switch end and a regular straitthrough end on the wall jack end.
Do I need to log into the switch and make conifiguration changes for port 1 or should it just work?
Thanks.

Hello,
which switch (e.g. Cisco 2950) and which IOS or CatOS version are you running ? Some of the newer IOS version have media-independant interface detection, in which case the sort of cable you are using would not matter anymore.
What do you have connected at the other end ? Typically, the uplink port would be a trunk, which has to be configured the same way at both ends. Can you post the configuration of your 'problem' switch and of the device (switch or router) that is connected at the other end ?
Regards,
GP

Cisco catalyst 4506-e boot error

Rommon signature verification PASSED for golden image
Rommon signature verification PASSED for primary image
FPGA signature verification PASSED for primary image
* Welcome to Rom Monitor for WS-X45-SUP7-E System. *
* Copyright (c) 2008-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. *
* All rights reserved. *
Primary Rom Monitor Version 15.0(1r)SG5
CPU Rev: 2.2, Board Rev: 10, Board Type: 101, CPLD Moka Rev: 7.0x3718.0xb565
Chassis: WS-C4506-E
Got Mac Address: c0:67:af:40:24:c2
MAC Address : c0-67-af-40-24-c2
IP Address : 14.18.2.234
Netmask : 255.255.255.0
Gateway : 14.18.2.21
TftpServer : Not set.
Peer supervisor not detected or is not running IOS
Supervisor uplinks and all linecards have been reset
***** The system will autoboot in 5 seconds *****
Type control-C to prevent autobooting.
******** The system will autoboot now ********
config-register = 0x2101
Autobooting using the first file from bootflash.....
loading image
Checking digital signature
bootflash:/cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.05.02.E.152-1.E2.bin: Digitally Signed Release Software with key version A
Rommon reg: 0x00004F80
Reset2Reg: 0x00000F00
Image load status: 0x00000000
Snowtrooper 155 controller 0x044DDBD2..0x04688FA7 Size:0x0041DCD4 Program Done!
[ 57.324367] pci 0000:00:00.0: ignoring class b20 (doesn't match header type 01)
Starting System Services
Calculating module dependencies ...
Loading rtc-ds1307
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
No Mountpoints DefinedNov 13 09:35:24 %IOSXE-3-PLATFORM: process sshd[4211]: error: Bind to port 22 on :: failed: Address already in use.
diagsk10-post version 5.1.4.0
prod: WS-X45-SUP7-E part: 73-14393-02 serial: CAT1837L75P
Power-on-self-test for Module 1: WS-X45-SUP7-E
CPU Subsystem Tests ...
seeprom: Pass
Traffic: L3 Loopback ...
Test Results: Pass
Traffic: L2 Loopback ...
post timeout
A Critical job [post] exited abnormally! Reloading the supervisor
Killed by signal [TERM]
Loading virtuclock as vuclock
Loading gsbu64atomic as gdb64atomic
Loading isp1362_hcd_k10
/dev/fd/13: line 273: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/edac_mc_log_ce: No such file or directory
Starting IOS Services
AIPC Module Loaded...
cat4k-watchdog[6250]: Watchdog daemon initialized on 2 CPU(s)
cat4k-watchdog[6250]: Watchdog daemon started.
Dumping all the logs to /root/reload.20141113..Please be patient
All logs dumped
sysmgr: <<%SYSMGR-2-SERVICE_CRASHED>> Service "System Manager (parser)" (PID 6820) hasn't caught signal 15 (no core).
/bin/kill: 8178: No such process
/bin/kill: 8179: No such process
/bin/kill: 8197: No such process
/bin/kill: 8198: No such process
/etc/rc6.d/S01reboot: line 198: umount_cisco_filesystems: command not found
Please stand by while rebooting the system...
[ 266.041680] Restarting system.
Rommon signature verification PASSED for golden image
Rommon signature verification PASSED for primary image
FPGA signature verification PASSED for primary image
* Welcome to Rom Monitor for WS-X45-SUP7-E System. *
* Copyright (c) 2008-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. *
* All rights reserved. *
Primary Rom Monitor Version 15.0(1r)SG5
CPU Rev: 2.2, Board Rev: 10, Board Type: 101, CPLD Moka Rev: 7.0x3718.0xb565
Chassis: WS-C4506-E
Got Mac Address: c0:67:af:40:24:c2
MAC Address : c0-67-af-40-24-c2
IP Address : 14.18.2.234
Netmask : 255.255.255.0
Gateway : 14.18.2.21
TftpServer : Not set.
Peer supervisor not detected or is not running IOS
Supervisor uplinks and all linecards have been reset
***** The system will autoboot in 5 seconds *****
Type control-C to prevent autobooting.
******** The system will autoboot now ********
config-register = 0x2101
Autobooting using the first file from bootflash.....
loading image
Version: cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.05.02.E.152-1.E2.bin
Any help PLZ

config-register = 0x2101
Autobooting using the first file from bootflash.....
You need to provide more information. What are you trying to do? How many IOS file(s) do you have in the bootflash?
sysmgr: <<%SYSMGR-2-SERVICE_CRASHED>> Service "System Manager (parser)" (PID 6820) hasn't caught signal 15 (no core).
Break into the auto-boot process and post the output to the command "dir bootflash:".

Cisco 4510E with two supervisor 8 problem

dear all
today we received new switch 4510r+E with two supervisors redundant .
my problem Is when I start the switch it is working fine for 10 mins after that it is stop forward data .
I try to force switchover to standby supervisor it is back to work for 10 minutes again after that stopped again .
any ideas

This is the only thing we found. we are trying it out tonight
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12162221/catalyst-4506-e-sup-8e-arp-issues-any-vlan?referring_site=bss&channel=bdp

Catalyst Control Center: Persistent Issues

Hello,
I am running an HP Pavilion dv7 with AMD graphics (ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650). After installing Windows 8.1 I have been experiencing problems. Whenever I try to run the Catalyst Control Center application, I get an error message:
"Catalyst Pro Control Center cannot be started. There are currently no settings that can be configured using Catalyst Pro Control Center."
This issue seems well documented online, and I have spent the past few days going over every reported work around I could find, including uninstalling and reinstalling the drivers and software directly from the manufacturer's website, without alleviating
the issue in the slightest. My best guess is that I have to hack a .inf file somewhere, but I have no idea how I am supposed to do this.
Please help.

Hi,
As far as I know, this is ATI graphic card driver compatibility problem, because your Graphic card is too old, its driver for Widnows 8.1 had some compatibility problem. You can try to install the latest beta edition for test.
In addition you can contact ATI to identify this problem.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

TCP delay on catalyst switch

i experienced a TCP delay on catalyst 4506, avoid the problem when i replaced 4506's with dummy unmanaged switches.
i used two PCs(PC 1 and PC 2) and two 4506 switches (S1 and S2)
PC 1 is connected to S1 (fast ethernet port)
PC 2 is connected to S2 (fast ethernet port)
S1 is connected to S2 (SFP gigabit ethernet port)
-I started continuous UDP,TCP,MULTICAST and PING from PC1 to PC2
-I unplugged link between Switch 1 and Switch 2
all communication stopped.
-I plugged link between Switch 1 and Switch 2
-UDP,MULTICAST and PING started immediately but TCP started with approximately 15 seconds delay. :-(
I repeated same procedure with unmanaged dummy switches instead of 4506, there wasnt 15 seconds delay. TCP showed up in 1 second.
How can I avoid TCP delay on catalyst switches? Probably some tuning with configuration would do the job?
tx for helping

hi gp and thank you very much for responding to this unusual problem.
- switch ports to the PCs are configured as portfast.
- switch ports between two catalyst switches are not configured (default)
- i didnt use the 'switchport access' command since they are default layer 2 interfaces. would 'switchport access vlan 1' command make any difference?
- i looked at the port status and confirmed connection is 100 mbps full duplex.
unusual issue is; ping, udp, multicast shows up in a very short time after I re-plug the uplink. that proves all ports are in forwarding state. only TCP shows up with delay, which doesnt occur on 200 $ unmanaged switch??
thanks in advance for any suggestions

Dreamweaver error when using Business Catalyst module tags in template

Hi all,
this is a recent and very distruptive error I have come accross in Dreamweaver CC.
When editing a document attached to a Business Catalyst template in Dreamweaver,
I was getting an error message (attached) saying:
"You have made changes to the code that is not marked as editable. If you retain those changes, they will be lost the next time you apply a template update to this file. Do you want to retain the changes until then?"
This happened every time I added a new html tag to the page, p div etc... which made DW unusable for editing files.
Having not got any useful help from BC support, they told me to contact Dreamweaver support!
In the end, I found through troubleshooting that it was the content holder module tags from Business Catalyst that were causing the problem,
I had recently converted my Header, Footer, Scripts etc to Content Holders in the site admin,
and when I removed these tags from my template and replaced them with the original html the problem disappeared.
The problem was happening on both my macs so the problem looked real to me,
but from searching online I couldn’t find people with similar issues, which made me think I must be doing something wrong.
As an aside,
I find the workflow between Dreamweaver CC and Business Catalyst, particularly in relation to DW templates very confusing.
I couldn’t find any up-to-date best practice guides for using DW in the Business Catalyst workflow that discusses the real issues I get every day:
- Best practice DW template editable region for {tag_pagecontent}
- BC pages updated from DW lose their page titles {tag_pagetitle} in BC admin (always causes problems for me)
If anyone is having these issues and found a way to get around them I’d be very interested,
I hope that this post will help some people who run into the same problem.
thanks, Kieran Mahon.

I found what may be at least a temporary solution to this problem. The error seems to something to do with the template file not having been updated, so whenever DW reads the file it looks like the template code has been changed (which of course it hasn't). It may be to do with the way BC treats the template code on the server side, as it seemed to start happening after I had downloaded some files from the server.
I opened the affected page and clicked Modify->Templates->Update Current Page and so far no error messages. Just one gotcha though. If you have any BC tags or Liquid code in your templates, DW converts it all to some kind of gobbledegook, so before you update the Template, copy all of your editable code and then paste it back in once the update has been done.

Catalyst 4506 12.2(25)EWA2 issue's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for