CATS transfer - multiple senders & receivers

Hi,
Can anyone let me know how to perform the following scenario in CATS:
The business scenario requires a two step process for transferring CATS time data. The first step uses a sending purchase order and purchase order item number, activity number (specifies service master record), and receiving cost center. The second step uses sending cost center with activity type, and receiving plant maintenance work order.
The reason for needing both steps is that the rates for the two steps are different. In the first step, the costs which go to the receiving cost center are at the rate specified in the activity number (service master record). In the second step, the costs which go to the receiving work order are at the rate specified in the activity type (activity type planning).
I would like to put all of these fields into one line entry in the time sheet, but when I do this, only the CATM transfer to materials management works. The costs do not transfer to the plant maintenance work order.
Is there any way to do this using standard SAP functionality?
Thanks,
Steve

The fields (with their technical field name) that we want to use are as follows:
Send.order - SEBELN
Item - SEBELP
Activity Number - LSTNR
Rec. CCtr - RKOSTL
Send. CCtr - SKOSTL
ActTyp - LSTAR
Rec. Order - RAUFNR
Activity - VORNR
Can anyone try a CATS transaction using all of these fields, and let me know if after the transfer process (CATM & CAT9) and acceptance of service entry sheet (ML81N), the costs show up on both the receiving cost center (at the rate specified in the activity number) and the receiving work order (at the rate specified in the activity type)?

Similar Messages

  • How to transfer multiple pdfs from email to iPad ibooks

    Is there any way to transfer multiple files from email or imessage to ibooks on an Ipad?
    currently email opens each one then have to click on top to open in ibooks.  I have over 50 files and expect more to come.  I have tried hooking up ipad to the macbook that sent the files and put into ibooks that way, but it would require syncing all my media files.
    Icloud and airdrop have failed me miserably for PDFs transfer to my ipad.

    I don't know if this will help you, but for PDFs on my IPad  I use either Note Taker HD or EverNote. Both are available at App Store. However each one is a pay for app. Note Taker HD app is a one time fee. EverNote is monthly. There is also
    FileApp Pro. These are the apps I use. So I have immediate access to any and all PDF's in a second or 2. Note that these are my personal preferences only. Hope this helps. Cheers.

  • How to set multiple senders for one account

    Hi all,
    I have a BIS account with my provider and a paid gmail account which collect for me mails from different address. Is it possible to set multiple senders for this account, thus it seems that I'm replying from one of these address and not only from my google address? In fact, it's important for me also that all mails come out from the same SMTP server (google).
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Pierluigi

    For the BlackBerry to "send using" a specific email account, it must be set up on your BIS account as an email account, otherwise, you can send from that account.
    You can do that, and then block ALL incoming emails from those accounts, and allow only incoming mail from your one Gmail account, if you desire.
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • BPM: Multiple synchronous receivers

    Hi Friends,
       I am trying a scenario : File --> XI > RFC(Multiple Receviers)> File(single).
       Can i send the message to multiple synchronous receivers using BPM. My Scenario goes like this...
    1). Send file to XI.
    2).Use BPM to send it to RFC(Multiple Synchronous Receivers).
    3).Send this response to Asynchrounous Receiver ( Write the response to a File using time stamp. So that all the response messages can be written) .
       Is it possible to do this using BPM... Ofcourse i have done a scenario for Multiple Asynchronous receivers using receiver determination and block step in BPM..

    Hi,
    You can use send synchronous call in your scenario.
    The point is, there can be multiple synchrounous calls from the send step.
    You would need a way to distinguish the 1st response from the second response. Therefore,we need to make use of correlation.
    After the send step, we need to use a receive step(with correlation), which will receive only the response corresponding to the correct request.
    Basically we are using the receive step with correlation here, to make sure that, we donot receive and process, the 2nd response(or 3rd or 4th response) for the 1st request.
    You said, your scenario is not working. Where exactly are you getting the error.
    Regards,
    Smitha.
    Message was edited by: Smitha Rao

  • Multiple client receivers

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement where the SENDER is SOAP and the receiver is RFC.
    Sender send the data and it should be bifurcated to 6 clients based on some condition.
    Previously  I have created a rule in receiver determination to send the date to multiple receivers which are existed in the same client.
    But now here they want to send the data to multiple client receivers based on the condition.
    Do I need to create the CC and receiver agreement for each receiver  or is there any other option available ?
    Please help me out with this.
    thanks and regards,
    praveen

    Hi praveen,
    Yes. You can handle this in the same way by creating the condition in Receiver determination.
    But here you need to create separate Interface determination and receiver agreement for each receiver. You can use existing RFC Communication channel in Receiver agreement.
    Regards
    Baskaran K

  • Transfer multiple rows to function module

    Hi Friends,
    I have th following requirement.
    In Visula composer I have 1 Input table.
    Here I read rows from material master and I have a checkbox and a button transfer.
    And I have a second table view with similar fields.
    In the first table view I check several rows and when I press transfer.
    Now I want all the checked rows of table view 1 to appear in table view 2.
    For this reason I want to create a FM to keep the data in a table I have created.
    In fact, I want to transfer the rows from table view 1  in a temp table and from there into table view 2.
    But how can I transfer multiple rows from visual composer into the temp table by means of FM.
    Many thanks for your help.
    RG. Jimbob

    Connect your table view 1 to your FM (make sure you flip the table on your FM to a input port).
    Select the connector you just created and configure element. Set mapping scope to 'Selected Data Rows'.

  • How do I force smart mailbox to only show me mail from one mailbox while also showing multiple senders?

    How do I force smart mailbox to only show me mail from one mailbox while also showing multiple senders?

    It would help to post what you've tried. It does, indeed, appear that -h is the switch, and the man includes several examples, so if you've followed the examples and it's not working then that hints that you should pass it back to Apple.
    You also don't say how you're implementing your change. Are you invoking slapd manually, or are you editing /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.openldap.slapd.plist ?
    You should be doing the latter, and I'd expect to see something like this:
    <array>
      <string>/usr/libexec/slapd</string>
      <string>-d</string>
      <string>0</string>
      <string>-h</string>
      <string>ldap://x.x.x.20/ ldap://127.0.0.1/ ldapi://%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fldapi</string>
    </array>
    (note the inclusion of ldap://127.0.0.1/ as an entry - you'll need to run on localhost as well the .20 address since all the local services will look to localhost)
    You might also need an ldaps URL if you're using SSL but let's walk before we try to run

  • Multiple Senders - One receiver

    I have a scenario where in there will be SOAP message comming in from multiple sender systems. The message format is same. Each one can be distinguished by plant code on the message.I have to load these messages into SAP R/3 using a RFC Adapter.
    Is there a possibility in XI that we can define multiple senders (as we can define multiple receiver determination based on condition).
    If BPM is the only way to resolve this, can somebody eloborate on the steps needed to be configured in BPM.
    Thanks.

    normally the sender service and interface is listed in the receiver determination so there would be one per sender that means even in your case multiple receiver determinations. However you can also use a wildcard (*) as sender in the receiver determination, than you can handle all your senders via one receiver determination.
    What you than have to make sure is, that you have one SOAP Channel per sender, so you can create one sender agreement per sender. Multiple sender agreements for one channel are not possible.

  • Multiple event receivers with a list

    Hi All,
    If there are two item event receivers attached with a list and event is cancelled by event receiver that trigger first, will second event receiver be invoked? As per my understanding that second event receiver will not be invoked.
    I have a requirement where in case first event receiver cancel the event, second event recever should still be invoked.
    do anyone has any idea aroound it?
    Regards Amit

    Hi, Amit KM.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg749858.aspx
    Notice the following details:
    Synchronous event receivers are called in sequential order based on the sequence number specified during event binding. This applies to both Before and After synchronous events.
    Asynchronous After event receiver threads are initiated in sequential order based on the sequence number. However, there is no guarantee that they will finish in that same order.
    An asynchronous After event can start at any time after its associated user action is performed. It may start before, at the same time as, or after the Web request is completed.
    After a user initiates an action in the SharePoint user interface, and before SharePoint Foundation executes the user action, the synchronous Before events are raised. If there are multiple synchronous Before events, they are raised in the order specified
    by their sequence number. Similarly, synchronous After events are raised after SharePoint Foundation executes the user action. These, too, are raised in the order specified by sequence number. As you can see, all synchronous events are processed in the same
    thread as that in which the user action occurs.
    Asynchronous After events, however, are processed on secondary threads.
    So you're completely right that if the first event receiver has cancelled the operation, the second event receiver will never been executed.
    In your case if you want second event receiver(B) to be invoked regardless of the first event receivers'
    (A) result you can easily swap the sequence numbers for those event receivers.
    Event Receiver Sequence          
    The event receiver sequence specifies the order in which an event receiver is executed in cases where an event triggers multiple event receivers. For example, if you have two
    ItemAdded event receivers bound to the same list (one from Assembly "1" and the other from Assembly "2"), the event receiver that is bound with a lower sequence number is executed first. A practical example is adding an event receiver to a
    system list that already has a system event receiver bound to it. In that case, you assign the new event receiver a higher sequence number.
    <Elements xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/">
    <Receivers ListUrl="Lists/Tasks">
    <Receiver>
    <Assembly>MyReceiverAssembly, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=Neutral,
    PublicKeyToken=12e5e5525fb3d28a</Assembly>
    <Class>MyReceiverAssembly.MyReceiverClass</Class>
    <Type>ItemAdded</Type>
    <Name>My ItemAdded Event Receiver</Name>
    <Synchronization>Synchronous</Synchronization>
    <SequenceNumber>1000</SequenceNumber>
    </Receiver>
    </Receivers>
    </Elements>
    LinkedIn Profile
    SharePoint Advanced Visibility Options project
    SharePoint Managed Metadata Claims Provider project

  • Multiple Email Receivers for Error Notify

    Dear Gurus,
    Do you know how to set up multiple mail receivers for error notify? I tried out by using u2018;u2019 and u2018,u2019, and neither of them works.
    Thanks!
    Mao

    Yes, this is possible. You should be able to use , or ; to separate the recipients. However, this functionality has not worked until version SAP 7.00 build M26.11 of the product.
    Which version of SAP CPS are you using?

  • Multiple queue receivers with disjoint message selectors - portable?

    Hi all,
    I was wondering whether an application that uses multiple queue receivers with disjoint message selectors would be portable across different JMS providers.
    I fear it's not - at least the spec clearly states that the implementation of message delivery to multiple receivers is provider specific, and I couldn't find any comment that this would be different with disjoint selectors. But I wanted to check with you - maybe I missed anything?
    What could be an alternative then (in case you want to avoid multiple queues)? Using a topic with durable subscribers?
    Regards,
    Sabine

    Hi Nimo,
    accepted - as long as the JMS spec requires the JMS provider to support multiple receivers. And that's exactly the point where I'm not sure...
    Literally it states:
    "For PTP, JMS does not specify the semantics of concurrent QueueReceivers for the same queue; however, JMS does not prohibit a provider from supporting this."
    The formulation "does not prohibit" makes me think that JMS allows providers also not to support this, for example, to throw an exception when a second consumer is created for the same queue, or not to serve it at all with messages as long as the first consumer is active. Not that I think it would be a very useful implementation - I just want to know if it would be possible. In that case, the application would not be portable.
    Regards,
    Sabine

  • How do I transfer multiple pics from my photo stream to camera roll so I can put on portable external hard drive?

    I try to transfer multiple pics from camera stream to camera roll so I can
    Upload to my home pc to save on external hard drive but they don't show
    Up in camera roll after selecting multiple. I have nearly 800 photos.
    Any easy way to do this??

    Hello and THANKS! Copying ALL the pics works doing the Command+A, but if I want to do a group of pics the Shift key does NOT work the same way as my PC. On the PC I can click on the first one in the group and the last one in the group, then the Shift key. All the pics in-between will be highlighted. Then I can right click to copy or move to the external hard drive. I have had soooo much trouble making the transition from a PC to a Mac........it is frustrating. And one of my hard drives is older and I don't think it is formatted right so I can only view the pics on it---not copy or change it in any way........

  • What is the easiest way to transfer multiple photos attached to a TEXT message to my MAC?

    What is the easiest way to transfer multiple photos attached to a TEXT message to my MAC?

    @randers4
    That is exactly what I've been doing.
    I get dozens of photos from a job site every day and it just takes forever.
    I had hoped there was an easier - or at least more direct and simpler way.
    Thanks anyway.

  • CATS: Transfer CATS - HR

    Hallo.
    I need som help with this problem.
    When a user has made a entry in CAT2, and saved. The user gets this message in Business Workplace. (the reason is that another user in the HR department is making a change, on this employee 1019, ausingen tcode PA30.
    My question is, can i turn off this email funktion somewhere????
    CATS: Transfer CATS -> HR
    Dear employee,
    Number of successfully retrieved data records:     1
    Number of successful postings                :     0
    Number of unsuccessful postings              :     1
    Error messages                               :
    1019 Record from 09.04.2008 with subtype FER could not be posted
    1019 Person is already being processed by user Helene-Therese Darré
    Best regards
    Helene

    I don't think that it's a good idea to turn of the warning.
    Don't you think it's important that a user knows that his data was not saved?

  • Behaviour of multiple queue receivers on same queue

    I have been trying to find out what exactly the jms specification states about having multiple queue receivers registered on the same queue. Some books and people say that one is only supposed to register one queue receiver per queue, if this is the case then one might as well use one topic subscriber per topic (what is the utiliy of a queue then).
    I believe that one is allowed to register multiple queue receivers on a queue, and a message will only be consumed by exactly one and only one queue receiver, thus allowing for true parallel processing. This is the behaviour I have observed when using jms on both JBoss and Weblogic (and apparantly is the same on Websphere).
    I have looked at the formal JMS spec from sun and they dont make it clear what the behaviour of multiple queue receivers on queue is. Can somebody PLEASE help me clear this up.

    The behaviour is undefined by the spec. Here is what it says:
    "Although it is possible to have two sessions with a QueueReceiver for the same queue, JMS does not define how messages are distributed between the QueueReceivers."
    However, multiple receivers on a single queue is a very popular design pattern. A typically pattern is to use the queue as a worklist and for work items to be posted to the queue. There is then a collection of workers who are registered as queue receivers picking out their work items from the queue. These workers are processing in parallel and as the workload increases you respond by add more workers.
    This pattern is usable where message ordering is not important and that the workers are stateless.
    Steve

Maybe you are looking for

  • Change of Business Partner in RE-Fx Lease Out Contract.

    Hi, I would like to know the possibility of change in the Business Partner in a RE Lease out contract wherein some postings have already made.i.e. A contract was created with Business Partner X and postings and invoicing was done. Later it was decide

  • How to run java program created in Sun Java Studio

    Hi All, sorry for easy question. I'm new in java. I have created Swing/AWT application with Sun Java Studio. I can run it using Sun Java Studio and it works properly. How to run this application in DOS-promt using "java ....."? I think, I shall defin

  • How much space does OS X Mountain Lion take?

    I am considering a MacBook Air 128 GB for my next laptop, but I'm not sure if that's enough. How much space does the OS take up?

  • Staging Downloaded oracle apps.

    Hi gurus, Can someone pls tell me how to go about the staging of downloaded oracle application from the "oracle.edelivery site".The application is a bulk of zipped files. please i need urgent help from you experts. Thanks and God bless

  • Is it good to use xmlrpc in flash lite 2.1

    Hi Friends, I am new developer to flash lite and i want to use xmlrpc protocol in my Application. So is there any body who can suggest should i use it or not. Regards Ashish