CcBPM queue blocked related to certain correlations being "busy"

The symptoms of the error is SYSFAIL on queue XBQ0 with StatusText: "Permanent error in BPE inbound processing"
This ccBPM bundles CREMAS idocs with a correlation on RCVPRN. There are 11 different RCVPRN, but the correlation is only working on 5 of those.
In SWIA i have 6 entries with status "ERROR" which are all "logically deleted". But these match with the correlations that are dysfunctional.
Any idea on how I can "reset" these correlations?

Hi Thomas
Please go into SWF_XI_SWPR and find the workitems in error. Then display the work item and click on task in error. Now make sure you are in "Technical work item display" (CtrlshiftF6). Here you can logically delete the step in error.
Now the entries should be gone in SWF_XI_SWPR
Best regards,
Chris

Similar Messages

Message Queue Blocking / MSGMNI Setting

Hi All,
Firstly, many thanks to all that can assists. I am currently getting Message Queue
Blocking messages in my ULOG files in my Tuxedo Application. (Tux ver 7.1 in Unix).
I am not sure what is causing this, but started to look into the Tux Config (UBB.MP)
and System message queue setting. Detailed as follows:
1)
Listed below is the system message queue setting:
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmni=2000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmax=128000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=100000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgssz=256
set msgsys:msginfo_msgseg=25088
set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=1550
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmap=1000
According to the BEA site, the MSGMNI is determined by this formula:
MSGMNI = MAXACCESSERS + 7 + (no. of servers with REPLYQ) + (no. MSSQ sets) - (no.
of servers with MSSQ sets)
The following is my current Tux. Config (UBB.MP) is set as :
- MAXACCESSERS = 2300
- Each servers (4 types in total) has its own REPLYQ and RQADDR.
- The same type of servers are set the same across 4 application servers.
Hence, my MSGMNI should be a minimum 2339 (ie. MSGMNI = 2300 + 16 + 16 - 0 = 2339).
But my current MSGMNI is 2000.
Would this contribute to my Message Queue Blocking?
Is my understanding correct and is this something I should change to avoid Message
Queue Blocking? Any helps and advice is much appreciated.

Malcolm,
Your information and explanations behind these error messages are very useful.
It allow me to further understand Tuxedo internal processing and at the same time
give me a chance to start analysing these fields.
I am reluctant to ask further questions at the mean time. I will use your suggestions
as a starting point.
I will certainly keep you posted of the outcome when I have made the changes in
my UBB config and machine parameters.
Many thanks with your help/explanations Malcolm. It helps alot!
Cheers.
David.
"Malcolm Freeman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi David,
The MSGTQL reference you give (Solution S-00488) refers to the BEA MessageQ
product
and is not relevant to Tuxedo.
The error messages indicate that the queue buildup is probably due to
a restartable
server failing. What happens is this:
When a restartable server fails its IPC queue remains in place and continues
to
receive messages (which will be processed when the server restarts).
Depending
on the time taken to restart, the queue could become full and unable
to receive
any more messages, and this is probably why you got the message CMDTUX_CAT:1380
indicating that the BRIDGE process was unable to put a message on the
server's
queue.
A server is only restarted when the BBL does a SANITYSCAN check. If,
for example,
your SANITYSCAN interval is 300 seconds and your server fails immediately
after
the previous scan, then there will be a delay of almost 5 minutes before
the failure
is detected and the server restarted - plenty of time for the queue to
fill up.
There are a few things you could do:
The key thing would be to find out why the server is failing, and fix
the problem.
If this is not possible immediately, consider some of the other ideas
below.
Have several servers form an MSSQ to service this queue; then if one
fails the
others will continue processing the messages while the failed server
restarts
(this assumes, of course, that your application does not require the
messages
to be processed in strict order through the server).
Reduce the SANITYSCAN interval (but don't make it too small). This would
reduce
the average time taken to restart the server.
Increase the size of the IPC queue (MSGMNB) so that it can hold more
messages.
I'm not sure why you got a LIBTUX_CAT:1485 message, but this could be
due to a
BRIDGE failure as a result of the congestion.
The NETLOAD parameter would reduce the number of messages going to the
remote
machine, but only if the local machine offers the same service. If the
remote
machine is the only source of the service then NETLOAD will have no effect.
I
recommend you do a search of this newsgroup for postings on "load balancing"
there's some good stuff which will explain how load balancing works.
Depending how things go, it might not be a bad idea to open a case with
BEA Support
and ask for guidance (remember to submit your ubbconfig (or preferably
do a tmunloadcf)
together with the complete ULOGs from both the master and the slave machine).
Hope this helps some.
Regards,
Malcolm.
"Dave" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Malcolm,
Thank you for your reply. Interesting point you have made about theMSGTQL
value.
Based on your suggestion I went hunting around the BEA site and found
the following
snipplet:
"- The MSGTQL parameter must be set to a value greater than or
equal to the MSGMNI setting."
(http://support.bea.com/application?namespace=askbea&origin=ask_bea_answer.jsp&event=link.view_answer_page_solution&answerpage=solution&page=msq/S-00488.htm)
If the above point is valid, then my MSGTQL is definitely way too low.
IF this
be the case, would you know of a method to work out what my MSGTQL bytes
value
should be?
Additionally, I have looked at other parameters which I could tune,and
would
adding a NETLOAD parameter in the *MACHINES section will reduce remote
servers
call? Which potentially, maybe reduce message queue blocking?
FYI:
The error messages I am seeing in my ULOG file are:
"LIBTUX_CAT: 1477 : ERROR .SysServerDied
LIBTUX_CAT: 1476 : ERROR: .SysServerRestarting"
Which then leads to message queue blocking
"CMDTUX_CAT: 1380 : ERROR: Message queue blocking prevented delivery,
Qaddr=..."
and potentially "LIBTUX_CAT: 1485 .SysNetworkDropped."
Many Thanks. Hope to hear from you (Malcolm) or other parties out there
that can
assists.
Thanks.
David

Message Queue Blocking/MSGMNI Confirmations

Hi All,
Firstly, many thanks to all that can assists. I am currently getting Message Queue
Blocking messages in my ULOG files in my Tuxedo Application. (Tux ver 7.1 in Unix).
I am not sure what is causing this, but started to look into the Tux Config (UBB.MP)
and System message queue setting. Detailed as follows:
1)
Listed below is the system message queue setting:
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmni=2000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmax=128000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=100000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgssz=256
set msgsys:msginfo_msgseg=25088
set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=1550
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmap=1000
According to the BEA site, the MSGMNI is determined by this formula:
MSGMNI = MAXACCESSERS + 7 + (no. of servers with REPLYQ) + (no. MSSQ sets) - (no.
of servers with MSSQ sets)
The following is my current Tux. Config (UBB.MP) is set as :
- MAXACCESSERS = 2300
- Each servers (4 types in total) has its own REPLYQ and RQADDR.
- The same type of servers are set the same across 4 application servers.
Hence, my MSGMNI should be a minimum 2339 (ie. MSGMNI = 2300 + 16 + 16 - 0 = 2339).
But my current MSGMNI is 2000.
Would this contribute to my Message Queue Blocking?
Is my understanding correct and is this something I should change to avoid Message
Queue Blocking? Any helps and advice is much appreciated.

Hi All,
Firstly, many thanks to all that can assists. I am currently getting Message Queue
Blocking messages in my ULOG files in my Tuxedo Application. (Tux ver 7.1 in Unix).
I am not sure what is causing this, but started to look into the Tux Config (UBB.MP)
and System message queue setting. Detailed as follows:
1)
Listed below is the system message queue setting:
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmni=2000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmax=128000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=100000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgssz=256
set msgsys:msginfo_msgseg=25088
set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=1550
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmap=1000
According to the BEA site, the MSGMNI is determined by this formula:
MSGMNI = MAXACCESSERS + 7 + (no. of servers with REPLYQ) + (no. MSSQ sets) - (no.
of servers with MSSQ sets)
The following is my current Tux. Config (UBB.MP) is set as :
- MAXACCESSERS = 2300
- Each servers (4 types in total) has its own REPLYQ and RQADDR.
- The same type of servers are set the same across 4 application servers.
Hence, my MSGMNI should be a minimum 2339 (ie. MSGMNI = 2300 + 16 + 16 - 0 = 2339).
But my current MSGMNI is 2000.
Would this contribute to my Message Queue Blocking?
Is my understanding correct and is this something I should change to avoid Message
Queue Blocking? Any helps and advice is much appreciated.

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x0041470c

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x0041470c (file 1, block 83724)
Fractured block found during buffer read
Data in bad block:
type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x0041470c
last change scn: 0x0009.90b485ad seq: 0x1 flg: 0x04
spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0
consistency value in tail: 0x00000000
check value in block header: 0x3092
computed block checksum: 0x19de
Wed Oct 03 09:58:32 GMT-4 2012
Reread of rdba: 0x0041470c (file 1, block 83724) found same corrupted data
Wed Oct 03 09:58:32 GMT-4 2012
Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/IXP/bdump/ixp_smon_19661.trc:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-08103: object no longer exists

962800 wrote:
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x0041470c (file 1, block 83724)
Fractured block found during buffer read
Data in bad block:
type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x0041470c
last change scn: 0x0009.90b485ad seq: 0x1 flg: 0x04
spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0
consistency value in tail: 0x00000000
check value in block header: 0x3092
computed block checksum: 0x19de
Wed Oct 03 09:58:32 GMT-4 2012
Reread of rdba: 0x0041470c (file 1, block 83724) found same corrupted data
Wed Oct 03 09:58:32 GMT-4 2012
Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/IXP/bdump/ixp_smon_19661.trc:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-08103: object no longer exists
Its not a corrupted block but a fractured block and also the object is not there anymore. So there is nothing that you are supposed to do.
Aman....

CMDTUX_CAT:1380: ERROR: Message queue blocking prevented delivery

Today, I changed a Tuxedo application (server) to the product systems(One master and two slaves). Only a small changes in code. But after a period of running, there are many errors in ULOG:
CMDTUX_CAT:1380: ERROR: Message queue blocking prevented delivery, Qaddr = 583902
And then, the server is died. After restart the server, this will happen again later.
I don't know why this happens? Thx.

Hi Bill,
This is happening because the BRIDGE process received a message from the network and was unable to place the message on the intended IPC queue. This could be because the server handling that message is backed up, or the system IPC resource settings are too low. Please check the recommended actions in:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E18050_01/tuxedo/docs11gr1/messages/cdtux/cdtux013.html
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

.SysMachineMsgq: message queue blocking

Hi,
I am getting the following error message:
064222.hostname!TMSYSEVT.14351.3071440608.0: WARN: .SysMachineMsgq: hostname message queue blocking
Is there anyway to pinpoint exactly which application and or which service is causing the blocking?
Thank you,
Ivan

Ivan,
You can look in the userlog for a "LIBTUX_CAT:672 ERROR: Message operation
failed because the message queue or the system is full" message. That will
tell you the process in which the msgsnd() failed, although it will not tell
you the specific queue that was full. If the queue full condition is not
something transient, you can use the "ipcs -q -a" command to examine the
number of bytes currently on each queue on the machine.
If you need to automate the process of searching the ULOG, the T_ULOG class
in TM_MIB(5) can be used.
The event message for the SysMachineMsgq event deliberatly contains very few
details, since the process where msgsnd() failed uses a message to inform
the event server of the failure and if a message queue is full, then there
might be a problem with sending a large message to the TMSYSEVT server.
(There is a check to prevent looping if the message send to TMSYSEVT fails.)
Ed
<Ivan Novick> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Hi,
I am getting the following error message:
064222.hostname!TMSYSEVT.14351.3071440608.0: WARN: .SysMachineMsgq:
hostname message queue blocking
Is there anyway to pinpoint exactly which application and or which service
is causing the blocking?
Thank you,
Ivan

Query regarding Queue block

Hi Experts,
The BASIS team has configured the CCMS alert for XBTI* and XBTO* queues in development system.
Hence we need to test the same.
Possibilities tried:
1. Huge payload
2. Stop and start of BPE this blocks the XBQ which is not needed as of now
3. Deregistering the specific queues. The queus is set to ready state until we register the same. Once registered the queue block is cleared. Hence this option is not helpful.
Kindly let us know the various ways to block the queues in PI.
Thanks
Suganya.

Hi,
If you have any interfaces using EOIO queues then try failing the same at mapping level and check...
Another option is try failing the interface at mapping level by sending some invalid data for normal interfaces (EO) only and check...but in this case runtime may not block the queues all the times only few times and few circumstances it will block the queues...
HTH
Rajesh

Corrupt block relative dba: in alert log

hi,
In our recovery database,I've found following error in alert log.
Thu Mar 27 07:05:57 2008
Hex dump of (file 3, block 30826) in trace file /u01/app/oracle/admin/catdb/bdump/catdb_m000_21795.trc
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00c0786a (file 3, block 30826)
Bad check value found during buffer read
Data in bad block:
type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00c0786a
last change scn: 0x0000.0013ed4d seq: 0x1 flg: 0x06
spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0
consistency value in tail: 0xed4d0601
check value in block header: 0x937c
computed block checksum: 0x8000
Reread of rdba: 0x00c0786a (file 3, block 30826) found same corrupted data
Thu Mar 27 07:05:59 2008
Corrupt Block Found
TSN = 2, TSNAME = SYSAUX
RFN = 3, BLK = 30826, RDBA = 12613738
OBJN = 8964, OBJD = 8964, OBJECT = WRH$_ENQUEUE_STAT, SUBOBJECT =
SEGMENT OWNER = SYS, SEGMENT TYPE = Table Segment
Now, how solve this error?
Thanks in advance.
Leo

Refer to metalink Note:77587.1. You may need to do further sanity block checking by placing the following parameters in the database instance init.ora parameter file:
db_block_checking=true
db_block_checksum=true
dbblock_cache_protect= true
Consult Oracle support before changing hidden parameters.

Corrupt block relative dba

Dear:
Running the CheckDB in the transaction DB13 and i get the following
message of error:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: ERROR, line: 16991, time: 2008-02-05 23.16.19, message:
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00c02702 (file 3, block 9986)
Other Details :-
OS :- Win 2003 server
DB :- Oracle 10g
So please help on this issue.
Thanks.
Regards.

Hello,
>> Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00c02702 (file 3, block 9986)
you have to check, if the block 9986 in file 3 is allocated and used in an active segment.
If it is an index ... you can easily rebuild it and the problem is gone... but if it is a table segment it is more complicated... but first check the block....
> sqlplus "/ as sysdb"
> alter system dump datafile 3 block 9986
> cd /oracle/<SID>/saptrace/usertrace
Take a look at the tracefile and check the seg/obj .. convert the hex value to a decimal ...after that query dba_objects;
> sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
> SELECT OBJECT_NAME FROM ALL_OBJECTS WHERE DATA_OBJECT_ID = <OBJN>;
Regards
Stefan

Outbound queue blocked in CFM2

Hello folks,
I am trying to activate the integration model in CFM2 and I am getting message
"Outbound queue blocked"
Function/Q/SAPAPO/CIF_PROD_INBOUND
Text: NOSENDS
When I try to manually send the data in the queue in SMQ1 in the r/3, system asks me login to the SCM system and even though I give proper login, queue fails with the error message "Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts".But there is no issue with the login credentials.
Can you please helpme out here.
Thanks,
Vikram

Hi
Although you may be entering the correct user and password, the user may now be locked. You need to check if the RFC user is locked and if so unlock then try again.
Regards
Ian

How to block call from certain number -Iphone 4?

How to block call from certain number -Iphone 4?

Also try searching for apps that can do this. Never heard of it before but there should be one around.

Block Patch KB3002657 from installing/being available via Windows Update via Group Policy

Hi Everyone,
Been hearing a lot of issues around with KB3002657 causing Authentication issues. We've recently appeared to have similar issues. I'm currently getting out SCCM guru's to run
an inventory on our environment to review if we have had this deployed to our environment, either by Windows Update (manual), SCCM/Wsus etc. If we do we're looking to have this removed and not deployed via our normal mechanisms to stop any production outages.
I would like to see if it is possible to block/hide this update from being visible from Windows Update, possibly by Group Policy.
From memory Microsoft created specifc ADM templates for blocking updated for Internet Explorer version to assist with the same type of issues (i.e. to stop IE from being updated
via Automatic Updates). Would there by anything like this available for this update, or does anyone know of another way (specifc Registry settings or ADM files that could be edited) to achieve this?
Thanks in advance.
Simon

Please, see solution:
The V2 release of MS15-027 / KB 3002657 that resolves NTLM v2
authentication failures by Windows Server 2003 DCs is available:
The X86 version is at http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46147
The ia64 version is at: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46204
The amd64 is at: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46054
Best Regards, Andrei ...
Microsoft Certified Professional

Something software related prevented me from being able to boot up my iMAC. The remedy was to wipe the computer of all soft wear and re-inatall everything via my time capsule. All good there.. but now I cannot open Ai and a box stating"Licensing for this

Something software related prevented me from being able to boot up my iMAC. The remedy was to wipe the computer of all soft wear and re-inatall everything via my time capsule. All good there.. but now I cannot open Ai and a box stating"Licensing for this product has stopped working" and to reference error code 150:30. How do I get my Ai to open?

Run the cleaner tool and reinstall it properly.
Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6
Download CS6 products
Mylenium

HT5463 Can you block calls from certain numbers

Can you block calls from certain numbers

You can also make a contact for those numbers and assign a silent
ringtone to them. The calls will still come in, but you will not hear them
and they will eventually go to vocie mail if you have it set up.
You must do this for each number as wildcards are not accepted in
Contacts, but all the numbers can be listed in one contact.
As Ocean20 has stated above, true call blocking is a function of
your wireless provider.

How do I remove a pop up blocker on a certain page

how do I remove a pop up blocker on a certain page

Check your web browser's settings. For Safari, this control is either in the Safari menu or the Security tab of its preferences.
(124307)

CcBPM queue blocked related to certain correlations being "busy"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for