CCP related: A timeout occured waiting for a response from the ECU
Hello All,
I had just started using ECU Calibration tool kit software. Iam using USB 8473 for my application.When I tried to run the VI after loading the *.A2L file, I see an error message saying "A timeout occured waiting for a response from the ECU ". Does anyone know how to communicate with the ECU through CCP.
Iam pretty sure that Iam using the right cable. I also checked the address of the parameters using Get property.vi what iam trying to read, wether they are matching with the address in the *.A2L file or not.They are matching. However I was able to communicate with my ECU when I use the same device to read the data over J1939 data link, based on arbitration ID's, with the Vi's from CAN Frame to Channel Conversion Library.
Can any pls help me out how to communicate with my ECU using CAN Calibration Toolkit software.
-Lucky.
Hello,
I am sending you an attachment of the manual for the ECU Calibration tool kit . Please go through the manual it will clarify your doubt. Moreover , check for can vi's in the example finder in labVIEW. Those will help ....
I am sending you a link which gives you some insight about the installation of CCP command set and the use of the toolkit with the USB CAN hardware.
http://digital.ni.com/softlib.nsf/websearch/D7DE248D07CAD00086256ED3004BAB8A?opendocument&node=13206...
Drivers and Updates: ECU Measurement and Calibration Toolkit 2.1
Attachments:
can manual.pdf 1437 KB
Similar Messages
-
BackupExec: A timeout occurred waiting for NDMPD.NLM to init
"Error: 1004 A timeout occurred waiting for NDMPD.NLM to initialize."
A very common and well documented issue but every fix I have found has not worked. The list is extensive so I will start by describing the issue, then the environment and finally what I have tried so far.
The issue
I can not load BackupExec 9.1 or 9.2 on NetWare 6.5 SP8. The loader starts and when it gets to loading NDMPD.NLM the CPU hits 99% (reported by monitor.nlm) and BackupExec stops loading for about 80-120 seconds. The loader eventually gives up after a non-critical abend. From this point on I can not unload becdm.cdm and I generally reboot the server to clear the abend.
BackupExec has been working on the server for about 2 years, I can not link any changes to the time it stopped working.
It used to load reliably every time for about 1.5 years and then it started to exhibit this issue when loading 1 in 10 times. It has gradually gotten worse and now will not load at all.
Before you say it, yes I know Symantec dropped BackupExec for NetWare years ago.
It seems to me this can only be a hardware issue now but I'm keen to hear any other ideas?
The environment
* The physical server is a HP DL385 G5 (SKU 411360-371), the tape drive is an external half height HP Ultrium 448 LTO 2 (SKU DW086A) using SAS to connect to a HP SC44Ge SAS HBA (SKU 416096-B21). It has 18GB of RAM, Two quad-core AMD Opteron 2352 2.1 GHz CPU's and 5 x direct attached SAS hard drives running on the internal P400 RAID controller configured with RAID 5.
* I can provide firmware versions if needed, the BIOS is HP A09 2009-07-11. Don't have the tape drive or HBA versions to hand.
* The server is running VMware ESXi 4.1.0 build 260247, using a free license i.e. stand alone.
* The VMware server uses about 50% of RAM, 70% of storage and 12% of CPU.
* The guest is NetWare 6.5 SP8 (overlay) running as a guest with 4GB of vRAM and a single CPU. The tape drive is presented as a generic SCSI device.
* I'm running BackupExec for NetWare 9.2.1401.5 build 287839 with the NetWare Open File Option and a Windows Remote Agent.
* I'm running the storage driver LSIMPTNW.HAM version 5.02, 5 Dec 2007, which is default with SP8. BackupExec 9.2 device driver becdm.cdm version 7.50, 7 Feb 2006.
* The NetWare server sees the tape drive as an "Unbound Device Object" until becdm.cdm is loaded at which point its recognsied as "HP Ultrium 2-SCSI T65D"
* The tape drive is listed on the BackupExec HCL - "StorageWorks Ultrium 448 LTO2" except mine is SAS not SCSI. Enterprise Support - Symantec Corp. - Symantec Backup Exec for NetWare Servers (tm) 9.x (9.0, 9.1, 9.2) Hardware Compatibility List. Includes HCL information for supported drives, libraries, virtual tape devices, fibre-channel HBAs, switches, and rou
What have I tried so far?
* We have a rental tape drive identical to our own as the original one was over-heating, so I have tried two physical tape drives. Both using the same server, HBA and SAS tape drive cable.
* I have used tcpcon.nlm to check that port 10,000 is unused.
* I have tried the parameter -!X on the line of bestart.ncf that loads BackupExec to stop it checking if port 10,000 is free.
* I have added a set statement to c:\nwserver\startup.ncf "set auto load of cdm modules = off" so it will not try to load unwanted CDM's.
* I have renamed all copies of nwtape.cdm to nwtape.cdx on the C: so they can not be auto loaded.
* There are no load statements in the startup.ncf for other tape drive device drivers. Just scsihd.cdm and idecd.cdm.
* There are no tape libraries or robots involved. Its just a basic tape drive.
* The physical and virtual server have been rebooted numerous times to ensure its not a memory issue etc...
* I've loaded the server with no other significant modules loaded. Just the basics like eDirectory etc... and the same issue still occurs.
* In addition to the NW65 SP8 default version of lsimptnw.ham I have tried version 5.03.01, 23 Jan 2008, from the LSI website.
* I have deleted the original BackupExec folder from the server (sys:\bkupexec) and re-installed BackupExec numerous times.
* I have powered off the tape drive a number of times
* I have changed the tape drives virtual SCSI ID, presented by VMware to the NetWare guest, to be a higher number on the same virtual HBA as the virtual disk. I have also tried allocating the tape drive a virtual SCSI ID on a dedicated virtual HBA, SCSI 1:0.
* I have deleted the SMDR config file (sys:\etc\sms\smdr.cfg) and re-created it using the command "load smdr.nlm new"
* I have deleted the NetWare servers backup queue and the SMS SMDR Group from eDirectory and re-created the queue using the command "load qman.nlm new". Note: as its NW65SP8 the SMS RPC object does not exist and the SMS SMDR group is not re-created.
* I have deleted the two BackupExec objects from eDirectory and re-created them by loading BackupExec using "bestart.ncf".
* I have checked the health of eDirectory.
* I have tried the LSI SAS and LSI Parallel virtual HBA's in the VMware guest machine.
* I have tried adding the parameter qtags=off to the load command for lsimptnw.ham in startup.ncf.
* I have tried the parameter -b on the line of bestart.ncf that loads BackupExec
* I have tried loading ipxspx.nlm to stop any public symbol error messages when loading BackupExec
* I have also tried BackupExec version 9.1 build 0306.12 and 9.1.1158.10 build 289707
* I have built a second NetWare 6.5 SP8 server (SP8 overlay DVD, MD5 verified ISO media) using the Backup server profile during the GUI install stage. I have loaded afreecon.nlm, installed VMware tools (vmwtool.nlm) and BackupExec for NetWare 9.2.1401.5 build 287839. The same issue occurs
System output
1) Excerpt from "list storage adapters"
0x04 [V358-A3] SAS1068:00008 [slot 8]
0x06 [V358-A3-D0:0] HP Ultrium 2-SCSI T65D
2) Backup Exec SureStart Console
Module NETDB.NLM is already loaded
Module SMDR.NLM is already loaded
Module TSAFS.NLM is already loaded
Loading module TSANDS.NLM
Module BECDM.CDM is already loaded
Loading module B2D.NLM
Module NWIDK.NLM is already loaded
Module NSS.NLM is already loaded
Loading module OFM.NLM
Loading module NRLTLI.NLM
Loading module AD_ASPI.NLM
Loading module NDMPD.NLM
Error: 1004
A timeout occurred waiting for NDMPD.NLM to initialize.
Press <Alt+Esc> to return to the Server Console. After you resolve
the error condition(s), re-execute the BESTART command.
3) Abend log
Novell Open Enterprise Server, NetWare 6.5
PVER: 6.50.08
Server halted Sunday, 6 May 2012 5:38:23.196
Abend 1 on P00: Server-5.70.08: Page Fault Processor Exception (Error code 00000002)
Registers:
CS = 0008 DS = 0010 ES = 0010 FS = 0023 GS = 0023 SS = 0010
EAX = 00000000 EBX = 00204B58 ECX = 896B77E0 EDX = 8A26157C
ESI = 00204B58 EDI = 00000F9B EBP = 8A261DD4 ESP = 8A261DA8
EIP = 8A1E03FD FLAGS = 00010082
8A1E03FD C680B00E000000 MOV [EAX+00000EB0]=?, 00
EIP in LSIMPTNW.HAM at code start +000013FDh
Access Location: 0x00000EB0
The violation occurred while processing the following instruction:
8A1E03FD C680B00E000000 MOV [EAX+00000EB0], 00
8A1E0404 8A45FC MOV AL, [EBP-04]
8A1E0407 8845F8 MOV [EBP-08], AL
8A1E040A 8A45F8 MOV AL, [EBP-08]
8A1E040D 89EC MOV ESP, EBP
8A1E040F 5D POP EBP
8A1E0410 5F POP EDI
8A1E0411 5E POP ESI
8A1E0412 5B POP EBX
8A1E0413 C3 RET
Running process: Server 10 Process
Thread Owned by NLM: SERVER.NLM
Stack pointer: 8A261F5C
OS Stack limit: 8A25A020
Scheduling priority: 67371008
Wait state: 50500F0 Waiting for work
Stack: --8A261E01 ?
--00000001 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+1)
--00951740 ?
8A1E0414 (LSIMPTNW.HAM|(Code Start)+1414)
--0097BAA0 ?
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--01900190 ?
--157C157C ?
--0D000001 ?
--0097BACC ?
--8A261D01 ?
--8A261E18 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
8A1DFD6B (LSIMPTNW.HAM|(Code Start)+D6B)
--0097BAA0 ?
--0097BAC0 ?
--00000001 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+1)
--0097BA50 ?
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--00F20000 ?
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--00200000 ?
--0097BAA0 ?
--0097BAC0 ?
--8A261EB0 ?
--8A261E44 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
8A1FAA64 ?
--0097BA50 ?
--00000F03 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F03)
--00000286 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+286)
--00951740 ?
8972FA00 (NWPA.NLM|HAI_Enable_Real_Mode_Access+34)
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--8A261E70 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
8A1FAC47 ?
--0097BA50 ?
--00204B58 ?
--0097BA50 ?
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--01080000 ?
--01080000 ?
--8A261E90 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
8A1FAC95 ?
--00952180 ?
--010824A0 ?
--02058001 ?
--8A261EB8 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
8A207658 ?
--010824A0 ?
--01091240 ?
--00951740 ?
--00008100 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+8100)
--00008134 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+8134)
--8A261EEC ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
8A208ED6 ?
--010824A0 ?
--00000003 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+3)
--00000046 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+46)
--02010002 ?
--010824A0 ?
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--00951740 ?
--00000001 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+1)
--00204B60 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
89729AE5 (NWPA.NLM|NPAThreadRoutine+3D)
--00010002 ?
-896E5110 (MM.NLM|PostponeEvent+0)
8973173F (NWPA.NLM|CDM_MountActivate_Message+EB)
--00000001 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+1)
--00000000 (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+0)
--802171E4 ?
--802171E4 ?
80327F6B (MM.NLM|RetryPostponedMessages+237)
--01081A00 ?
--00204B60 ?
--00000F9B (LOADER.NLM|KernelAddressSpace+F9B)
--00204B58 ?
--00204B58 ?
003682B2 (SERVER.NLM|CallAESRoutineWithEsiSet+A)
Additional Information:
The CPU encountered a problem executing code in LSIMPTNW.HAM. The problem may be in that module or in data passed to that module by a process owned by SERVER.NLM.
Thanks,
MCWell the problem is now resolved. It was either faulty tapes (about 12 of) or two tape drives with faulty heads. We had the heads replaced in one of the drives and tested it with a new tape, it works perfectly again.
MC -
I am having a problem with Firefox. Whenever I open it, it runs fine for about five seconds and then freezes. A small white rectangle appears in the upper left corner of the browser window. The screen still scrolls fine, but whenever I try clicking on anything (including the menus in the toolbar), it just gives me an unresponsive 'ding' sound. When I try closing the programme with Ctrl+alt+delete, I get a message saying 'The system cannot end this programme as it is waiting for a response from you'. I originally had this problem with an earlier version of Firefox and tried installing Firefox 4 to see if this helped. It worked for two days and began doing it again. I have already tried un- and re-installing Firefox and restarting my computer, and Firefox will not run properly for long enough to let me disable any add-ons or plug-ins. What can I do to fix this?
I've added a couple of screencaps of the problem. (or tried to)
[http://i53.tinypic.com/161hvh2.jpg The white rectangle]
[http://i51.tinypic.com/dwsq1.png Error message]Have also since found out that to start FF4 in safe mode you just hold shift whilst double-clicking the icon. We only find these things out after the event, murphy's law!
-
Still waiting for a response from Adobe regarding the post "Printing a pdf from a marked-up pdf" dated 15 Dec 2012 9:20 AM.
Look everyone that comes here with a support problems has gone through all the normal channels, around and round in circles with no one seeming to be interested. They've called every phone number, every email address they can find. They have been put on hold and bounced fifty times to another operator only to be hung up on. If Adobe would bring back support to main land and have people that know what's going on instead of having people that people can barely understand read from scripts. Scripted information only applies about 10 % of the time. I'm just giving people an alternative. after they have torn their hair out going the normal route. If they had been able to get a solution they wouldn't be coming here for help.
There should be a forum set up just for people to air these issues and Adobe employees forced to man it. Then we wouldn't have to have such a Bad attitude. Right now Adobe's Support reputation is worse than Intuit's which did have the absolutely worse on the Planet. Now they are number 2.
You know it yourself that Adobe's support is absolutely worse than terible. However to prevent me from being banned from the forums I will simply will provide the adobecare email address from now on
So let's sweep it under the rug. -
For some reason the video chat doesnt even read that the other person has accepted the chat? I know the person who I am trying to video chat has no problem connecting with other people. Help please?
HI,
iChat 2 through to iChat 6 then Messages beta in Lion and Messages full app in Mountain Lion can do Video chats.
I have an older G4/1ghz Dual Processor computer booted in to OS X 10.4.11 and iChat 3.1.9
I have issues with Messages trying to Invite the iChat 3.x.x machine.
It's video chat window does the same as yours, stating it is " Waiting for a response from xxxx"
However no Visible invite ever appears on the iChat 3. computer.
On the other hand I can invite from iChat 3 to Messages and make a connection.
I am not having a issue from Snow Leopard (iChat 5) to Messages in Mountain Lion.
I had based my first reply on the Question
For some reason the video chat doesn't even read that the other person has accepted the chat?
(i.e. nothing about the computers involved).
From the newest MacBook Pro (not retina) to the new MacBook Pro (not retina).
This bit in your latest reply does really tell me where you bought them and what was installed when you got them and what is Installed now.
Some people have described problems on Lion machines after installing the latest Apple Remote Desktop Client
(Everyone has Apple Remote Desktop Client on their System and it is used with iChat in iChat Screen Sharing - it provides the Engine as it were. It also does the Screen Sharing within the Finder as well as providing one end of the Apple Remote Desktop help)
As a starting point I would go to the app's menu > Preferences > Video Section ans set the Bandwidth Limit on both machines to 500kbps
This can help if there are vast differences in Internet speeds at either end.
8:01 PM Tuesday; August 21, 2012
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Lion 10.7.2)
G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
Mac OS X (10.6.8),
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images." No, Seriously -
Application waits for a responce from the DB ...
Hi friends,
I have a multi threaded .NET application that interacts with ORACLE 10g DB.
When the multi thread is executing for less than 4hrs continuously there is no problem, but if it continuous execution for more than 5hrs the application doesn't respond.
To track the problem i have followed the standard logging process i.e. to a file. When i analyzed the file i could see the application sending a request to the DB and waits for the reply, but the server doesn't reply.
One thing to be looked in is that the same piece of code was execution for 5hrs.
I have no idea of this behavior, some one please help me out ...Hi Pierre Forstmann,
I am not a ORACLE DBA expert but managed to get some information,
Error message in database alert log file.
Alert_<DB_NAME>.log
ORA-1654: unable to extend index SYSMAN.MGMT_SYSTEM_PERF_LOG_IDX_01 by 8 in tablespace SYSAUX
There are no queries waiting on DBA_WAITERS or DBA_BLOCKERS.
The application is executing PL/SQL statement (Procedure, Functions).
Four tables are related to this process.
Initial Count
T1 - 0 Records
T2 - 0 Records
T3 - 0 Records
T4 - 0 Records
Count after 4-5 hrs of execution
T1 - 38269 Records
T2 - 654818 Records
T3 - 992579 Records
T4 - 4422 Records
I have identified the session that is used by my code from V$SESSION.
Initially when i issued the below select statement:
SELECT status,state,wait_time,seconds_in_wait FROM V$SESSION WHERE USERNAME = 'XXX';
STATUS;STATE;WAIT_TIME;SECONDS_IN_WAIT
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1377
ACTIVE;WAITED SHORT TIME;-1;2
ACTIVE;WAITED SHORT TIME;-1;0
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1377
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1377
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1377
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1377
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;4
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1377
Yes, The data in V$SESSION changes over time.
After 5 Min interval
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1496
ACTIVE;WAITED SHORT TIME;-1;2
ACTIVE;WAITED SHORT TIME;-1;5
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;2
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1496
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1496
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1496
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1496
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;0
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1496
After 2 Min interval
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1452
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;0
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;0
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;0
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1452
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1452
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1452
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1452
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;5
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1452
After 1 Min interval
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1751
ACTIVE;WAITED KNOWN TIME;2;0
ACTIVE;WAITED KNOWN TIME;1;1
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;7
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1751
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1751
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1751
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1751
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1
INACTIVE;WAITING;0;1751
After 4-5 hrs of execution and when the application was waiting for the reply from the DB server i issued the same select statement.
Result is : No rows returned.
I would like to know what would be the reason that all the 10 session have disappeared from V$SESSION. -
Sending a request to a servlet without waiting for a response
Hi,
I have a client application that needs to send information to a servlet for processing. I would like to be able to send the information in question without having to wait for a response from the servlet. The reason for this is that I want to speed up the "sending" process. I know that http communication is based on TCP which is a connection-oriented network protocol, but I thought maybe there was a work-around to this.
Thanks in advance for your help,
ChrisThere r two ways to do this. First, if you can modify the application simply don't wait for the response do whatever you want and ignore the response. If you need the response in order to continue you will have to wait, but you can do this in a separate thread, while the main thread can do other things.
Second, if you can't modify the application but you can modify the servlet, make the servlet respond as quick as possible, doing the work after having answered. Once again if the application needs the results of the process there is no way, you'll have to wait. -
Jakarta HTTPClient , dont wont to wait for a response.
Hi there.
I wonder if I can do that , I want to send a post\get request to another server but I don�t want to wait for a response from it.
Actually, I want to continue with my program regardless to the response and don�t want to be delayed while waiting.
How can I do it?
Hope I made myself clear, thanks.
Shlomispawn a Thread that will send the request. When it's time to process the response, check the Thread to see if any response was returned from the server.
example
public class MyThread extends Thread{
private String response = null;
private int status = 0;
private boolean complete = false;
public void run(){
// TODO: et the response from the server
// set the response and status and complete (synchronize all variable when doing this)
public boolean isComplete(){
return complete;
public String getStatus(){ return status; }
public String getResponse(){ return response; }
public class Demo(){
public static void main(String args[]){
// do some work
MyThread thread = new MyThread();
thread.start();
// do some more work (don't wait for server response
// now it's time to get the response
while (!thread.isComplete()){
try{ Thread.sleep(1000); } // sleep for 1 second
catch (Exception e){ }
String response = thread.getResponse(); -
Should clients of long-running processes wait for a response?
I am a bit confused by the worklist tutorial where the client waits around for
a response from the worklist process that blocks on human input. This may be okay
for the sample application, but is it a realistic scenario? Have you designed
any practical worklist processes this way? I would have thought that the client
of a worklist process would simply trigger the process and go away. Eventually
when the human involved in the process would take some action, the process would
then, for example, send a message to some application. What do you think? I would
be interested in your opinions and perhaps some real examples of how you are using
worklists.
Thanks.
P.S. Is it even possible for a worklist client to trigger the process and go away?
Would the process die because the client has gone out of scope?I agree with your comments. In being honest as well, we unfortunately do have SRs that get behind or missed. It's very frustrating on our side as well when we have these come up. We have implemented a number of technologies and also human touch to help us catch these and continue to focus on ways to overcome these delays. I know it's frustrating for you as well.
Our customer satisfaction is very high and actually continues to increase each Qtr. Our data shows us our three key satisfaction areas are; speed of response, speed of resolution and followup.
Chat support helps us in response time, but sometimes may hinder us in resolution times. Especially with more complex issues. Our goals were not to totally replace the phones with chats, but to use chat to allow us to respond more quickly, which it has done. We're now focusing our folks to realize it's still ok to call you when the Chat is hindering resolution and it would be quicker to talk live about the issue.
We resolve over half of the SRs on the first day. We continue to focus on speeding up the resolution of those that go beyond the first day. A couple things we've implemented are we call you back at least every 2 days when the SR is in Novell's court and at least every 5 days when it's in your court. We've also implemented timed escalation for SRs and are now looking at also escalating when progress is not being made after a certain number of days (rather that just time open). The goal is to get you in the hands of the right person asap to speed up the resolution time.
We're also having Managers call you on more and more SRs before being closed to double check your satisfaction with the SR.
Our dream is to never have you need to ask us for attention on a SR. We continue to make progress on it.
I look forward to your thoughts and other ideas you may have to help us improve,
-Todd
Todd Abney
Technical Support Director
Novell -
Timeout(60 seconds) occurred waiting for page to load
Hello,
Can somebody provide solution for mentioned problem-
After Browser launch when I try to navigate the URL, openscript is throwing error (Timeout(60 seconds) occurred waiting for page to load.).
Error code - WAIT_FOR_PAGE_TIMEOUT_ERROR.
I am performing following steps.
1. Launch Browser
2. Navigate to Oracle EBS url
3. Close Browser
4. Launch Browser
5. Navigate again to Oracle EBS url
The last steps is not working correctly, openscript throw timeout error and also IE msg "Internet Explorer has stopped working".
IE version - 8
Thanks.Any comments plz
-
Client-Auth reports: HTTP4030: Timeout while waiting for client certificate
Hello,
I'm having problems with the certificate authentication in my Sun Java System Web Server Enterprise Edition 6.1: I have created an ACL in the SJWS that asks for a client certificate when the user goes to a specific URI:
acl "uri=/server1/myaction.do";
authenticate (user) {
method="ssl";
deny (all)
user = "admin";
It works great and, when the user goes to "/server1/myaction.do" (we are using Internet Explorer 7 as Web browser), the window for selecting the client certificate appears:
- If the user selects a certificate that doesn't require password, everything works fine.
- The problem comes when the certificate is configured in Internet Explorer for asking for a password every time it is accessed. Once the user has selected the password protected certificate, the window for typing the password appears, but if the user doesn't type it and click OK IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS (I've timed it), the following messages appear in the SJWS logs:
[28/Nov/2007:09:25:05] failure ( 2055): for host 10.0.145.11 trying to GET /server1/myaction.do, Client-Auth reports: HTTP4030: Timeout while waiting for client certificate.
[28/Nov/2007:09:25:05] security ( 2055): HTTP4290: get_auth_user_ssl: client passed no certificate.
I tried to add the following two lines to the magnus.conf file of the SJWS, but nothing changed:
SSLClientAuthTimeout 240
AcceptTimeout 3600
Has anyone experienced something similar? Any little piece of advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much in advance,
Carlos.This is fixed in Web Server 7.0 update 2. Please migrate/upgrade to Web Server 7.0 update 2. Sorry for the inconvenience.
-
Hi guys,
On a random base (daily, weekly) we're experiencing major log-in problems on our Windows Server 2012 R2 Remote Desktop Services farm. The VM's are hosted on Hyper-V 2008 hosts and we're not using Citrix techniques etc.
Users are reporting that they cannot log-in, the log-in sessions hangs with a blank screen when loading their user profile (e.g. Please Wait For The User Profile Service).
In the System event log of the server on which the user is logging on the following errors are shown:
Source: Service Control Manager
Date: 23-12-2014 7:28:01
Event ID: 7011
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Description:
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
…and after 30 (or sometimes 60) seconds, the same error only another service (in random order):
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
…and after exactly 30 seconds, the same error only another service:
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UxmSms service.
etcetera, with the following errors:
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the Netman service.
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the AudioEndPointBuilder service.
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the WPDBusEnum service.
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the NlaSvc service.
The Portable Device Enumerator Service service failed to start due to the following error:
The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion.
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the TrkWks service.
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
These errors are logged continuously.
An administrator cannot solve this since he isn't able to login in as well (console or remotely), only a hard reset of the VM is possible to use the affected server again.
I took different steps to solve this problem without any success, like:
- Installing the latest Windows updates
- Removed unnecessary printer drivers, print monitors and print processors (no local printers/drivers are installed, only Remote Desktop Easy Printer driver is used)
- Searched different forum posts, but found only hotfixes for Windows Server 2008 R2.
Can someone please help me with this annoying problem?
Many thanks!!
EDIT:
Of course is increasing the time-out not really an option here... http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/13765.event-id-7011-service-timeout.aspxHi Jeroentjuhh,
1)Do you see this problem on all VM's or only on Windows 2012 R2 server?
2)Are these VMs' in hyper-v cluster?
3)Do you see event id 56 or 50? Please see the below link if it helps you to resolve these events.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/scstr/archive/2012/02/29/how-to-troubleshoot-the-terminal-server-security-layer-detected-an-error-in-the-protocol-stream-and-has-disconnected-the-client-client-ip-and-the-rdp-protocol-component-x-224-detected-an-error-in-the-protocol-stream-and-has-d.aspx
Thanks,
Umesh.S.K -
Timeout in waiting for IPS service to start. Component: IPS
Hello
I have an sa 520 and in logs i see the message
<Timeout in waiting for IPS service to start.
Component: IPS>
i am sure that ips failed to start because although i have enabled ips in lan with
Signature File SBIPS000019 i do not see any logs for ips events
firmware version = 2.2.0.7
the above happened after a facory reset and configuration from scratchWell the problem is now resolved. It was either faulty tapes (about 12 of) or two tape drives with faulty heads. We had the heads replaced in one of the drives and tested it with a new tape, it works perfectly again.
MC -
Finding the related field for "Leave Type" from the BI content in HR modul
Hi good after-noon!!
Can any one help me out in finding the related field for "Leave Type" from the BI content in HR module?
Regards,
Suman.Hi Suman ,
U can get the information in KTART field in PA2006 table in SAP. This field can take values like annual leave type, long service leave, study leave etc....
Regards
vamsi -
Lion in the app store I bought, now he is waiting for 12 hours in the dock on
lion in the app store I bought, now he is waiting for 12 hours in the dock on is this normal?
Go to appstore > purchases > does it say install?
If so, go install it
Enjoy!
Maybe you are looking for
-
can i use an external hard drive in windows to add additional storage after my initial partition is set up. i want to add a 500 GB external hard drive to use with my windows. I set windows up in boot camp with a 50 GB partition? I now want to add ano
-
Cant find transfereed video and music files
i transferred some video and audeo files from my computer by blue tooth to my nokia lumia 630, but cant findwhere to find them to play
-
Is there a possibility to insert a horizontal line in an equation? Prevereable in LaTex in a aligned area like in the example below. I found some kind of workaround but its far from perfect: \begin{aligned} x+y &=y+x\\ &\underline{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;
-
How to find grouping data in oracle
table a mob_no,call_start_time,call_end_time,cgi_id_key table b cgi_id_key,latitude,longitude i want to find out data from table a,table b select a( mob_no,call_start_time,call_end_time), b(latitude,longitude) join_cluse cgi_id_key group by clause se
-
Application server : Enterprise Manager ias Console - No response
Hi All, We have 10gApplication server infrastructure and the middle tier servives for discoverer installed In the infrastructure tier the Enterprise Manager ias Console is starting up with out any error message, but in the discoverer middle tier the