CDR Admin Read Only rights

I would like to set up a CAR Admin with read only rights. Meaning they can generate reports but not change any of the setting. Ie CDR dial-plan config, Auto report generation. Is there really a way to do that or do I have to make a "CARUser" account and then make "CARUser" a manager for the whole company?

There are only 3 kinds of users you can have in CAR and they're not configurable beyond that. There is no MLA here.
Understanding the Role of CAR Administrators, Managers, and Users
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/8_0_2/car/carovrvw.html#wp1022182
HTH
java
If this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Similar Messages

I have an external hardrive for MAC, I needed to save something from my work computer so I can pass it on to my MAC, it requiered me to re-format my external HD and now when I connected to my MAC I only have "read only rights". How do I fix it?

I have an external hardrive for MAC, I needed to save something from my work computer so I can pass it on to my MAC, it requiered me to re-format my external HD and now when I connected to my MAC I only have "read only rights". How do I fix it? I run my Itnues from this external and now my library is gone. Luckily I have it saved somewhere else, which is not a problem, but I won't be able to write to this HD for right now. I can't see an option to give those permission back.

cptjuanjvarona wrote:
I have an external hardrive for MAC, I needed to save something from my work computer so I can pass it on to my MAC, it requiered me to re-format my external HD and now when I connected to my MAC I only have "read only rights". How do I fix it?...
Unless what you have to transfer is enormous, skip the external HD altogether and use a USB flash drive; you can get them with capacities to 128GB. Format the flash drive as FAT32 or ExFAT as LowLuster suggests so it can be read and written to on both PC's and your Mac.

"Edit Locally" for Repository having "Read only" rights

hi,
    I am on EP6.0 SP9.
When I go to
     Content Administrator --> KM Content --> Repository(having "Read Only" rights), and click on "Context Menu" an option "Edit Locally" come there. But as the repository has "Read only" rights, I need to disable that option.
Is there any way to do that?
Regards
Mridul.

Hi Patricio,
            Perhapps that link is not woking fine, so i have pasted that code here, so please have a look at the code here,
public void received(IEvent event) {     IRecipient recipient = null;
     IResourceEvent myEvent = (IResourceEvent) event;
     IResource res = (IResource)event.getParameter();
     System.out.println("Event");
     String resname = res.getDisplayName();
     try{
     ISubscriptionManager subscriptionManager =
com.sapportals.wcm.repository.service.subscription.SubscriptionUtils.getSubscriptionManager(res);
     ISubscriptionCondition mycondition =
subscriptionManager.createSubscriptionCondition();
     mycondition.setInterval("ALWAYS");
     mycondition.setRecursionLevel("999");
     mycondition.setRidTracking
(subscriptionManager.getDefaultConditionRidTracking(res));
     ISubscription simpleSubscription =
subscriptionManager.createSubscription( res.getContext(),resname, mycondition, res, null, recipient, null);
     }catch (WcmException e){
          System.out.println(e);     }
Thanks And Regards,
Mridul.

I want to give a user to read only rights on sql server agent 2008

I want to give a user to read only rights on sql server agent 2008.When I giving SQLAgentuser Role then user is only able to view SQL Server agent as Green but no job visible in job activity monitor.Currently he has db_reader rights on one user database.
What rights should I give?
Thanks

There are 3 SQL server Agent fixed database roles in sql server.
1.SQL AgentUSerRole:- To create and manage jobs
2.SQLAgentReaderRole: To grant read acces.
3.SQLAgentOperatorRole : to run and delete jobs.
For you question you can create a user and grant him SQLAgentReaderRole.
Example:
Create LOGIN test with Password='abc'
Use msdb;
GO
Create User test for login test
use msdb;
EXECUTE sp_addrolemember @rolename='SQLAgentReaderRole',@membername='test'
Hope this solves your problem!!!

User with read-only rights!

Hello. i need to create user that have read only rights to every table on database, but only read only.
Could you please provide a statment for that or a link where can i find that kind of information.

Hi;
Similar topic mention here many times. Please see:
Read only user creation
Read only user creation
PS:Please dont forget to change thread status to answered if it possible when u belive your thread has been answered, it pretend to lose time of other forums user while they are searching open question which is not answered,thanks for understanding
Regard
Helios

Grant read only-rights to own schema

Hallo,
i have a schema (and i am the owner) of schema bbi. Now I wanna give to me read-only- rights. Is this possible? What ist the sql-query to give this rights to bbi? Which rights do I have as the owner of a schema? Which tables are nessasary?
Hope I do not mix anything!!
Thanks, Katrin

One possible way would be to put your table into an
read-only tablespace, but then no one could update
it.Although the owner can still drop tables in a read-only tablespace (since that only involves updating entries in the data dictionary).
I'd second Andrew's question about why you'd want to do this. Normally, you would have one user that owned all the objects and grant many other users read-only access to that schema.
Justin

Read only rights Personal directory

I'm using cucm 9.1. I want to give Read only rights on Personal directory to some of my IPT users.
How can i acheive this in CUCM 9.1.
Regards

That's not an option with personal directories; they are always editable by the end user account. You can use ecosystem partner products (or your own coding if you're so inclined) to create read-only directories and then subscribe these to the phone(s) that you want to see that custom set of listings.
To be honest, at very small scale you could just write the XML flat file in accordance with the XML SDK, create a phone service with the URL to that XML file, and subscribe a single phone to it. Anything more ellaborate than this just makes it easier to maintain at scale.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

Workflow Admin read only responsibility in EBS 11.5.10.2

Hi All,
I have a requirement to create a read only workflow administrator. For that I have done the below steps.
1. Created one permission set with Monitor Data.
2. Created one role and one grant for that role with the above selected permission set.
3. Then I have assigned the responsibility Workflow Administrator Web (New) to a user.
4. Assigned the above created role to to that user.
Then I tried to access the WF pages from that user, but still he is able to do all the activities that is possible by the Workflow Administrator Web Applications responsibility.
When I navigated to Workflow Administrator Web Applications-->Administration, Workflow System Administrator LOV is having value '*'. I changed that to 'Workflow Administrator Web Applications', and tried to access Workflow Administrator Web (New) from the above user.
Now no buttons are enabled for him. But in the Status Monitor, the user will be able to view only the Workflows owned by him.
But my requirement is to view all users workflow.
Can anyone guide me on how to achieve that.?
Also, I found that there is no significance for assigning Monitor Data permission. Please suggest me on that aspect also.
Hoping for youe valuable comments.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Charls K V

Hi Charls,
The note is also telling the same thing.:(
Then is there anyway to achieve my requirement.
Should be able to query everything as the admin does. But won't be able to perform any actions.
Looking forward for your valuable comments.I did manage to create the same using (How to Restrict Access to Data in the Workflow Monitor based on Item Types? [ID 559072.1]) but for specific item type (omit this step if you want to have access to all item types).
If you could share the steps you followed (in details) to implement the above, it would be helpful.
Please also review (How to enable Workflow Owned By LOV in Workflow Status Monitor for a User other than SYSADMIN [ID 1328447.1]) and see if it helps.
Thanks,
Hussein

Read only rights in a content server

Hello, we have a content server which we can access from 2 different SAP systems.
Now we want to secure the content server that read/write access is only possible from SAP system A, and from SAP system B we would like only to have read access.
Working with certificates did not give till now any solution.
From the moment we submit a certificate from server B, we can do read/write towards the content server
Removing the certificate in CSADMIN on SAP system B will prevent reading of the content server.
We run Contentserver 6.40 in a AIX5.3 /MaxDB 7.6 environment with adminsecurity in cs.conf set to 1
Regards, Danny

Yes this has been tried.
When you have updated with system B and content looks like
contRep-ZSTR057
DefaultDocProt=r
If you then go to system A and look into CSADMIN, you see also
contRep-ZSTR057
DefaultDocProt=r
You could change this to for example on SYSTEM A to
contRep-ZSTR057
DefaultDocProt=ruc
If you then go to system B in CSADMIN you wil also see
contRep-ZSTR057
DefaultDocProt=ruc
the CSADMIN settings are stored in the file on the contentserver (Apache part) and not in SAP
We were hoping that with the certificates we could do something.
But as what I can tell after all test we have done is that a content server is standing on its own, and only link it has to identify systems is via a certificate.
I have a user who says he has done this kind of a test on an other environment we have and there he was successfull, but we can not repeat the test, nor does the user know how he had set it up.
That is why I am asking how this could be done.

Read Only RPD Group

Can you create a group in the OBIEE Admin Tool (RPD) that has read only rights to the RPD? I want to grant access to the RPD to a group of users, but do not want them to be able to make any changes to the RPD. Is this possible?

hi,
Only a user who belongs to Administrators group can access/login to rpd there no question of having read only access to rpd
Thanks,
Saichand.v

Read-only aaa statements

I've setup the TACACS server with two groups
-FULL admin rights
-READ only rights
Two users have been created
-admin_test
-read_test
The admin_test config works fine on AAA but i keep getting stuck with read_test configs. I can never get to enable mode eventhough i've defined it on the group policy. Is there something wrong with my aaa statements below?
aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ line enable
aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable line
aaa authorization exec default if-authenticated
aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+
aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group tacacs+

Privilege is not scalable in a big environment.
What you need is authorization on the ACS
server. In Cisco Freeware TACACS+ I defined
the following groups: readonly, advanced and
admin:
group = readonly {
default service = deny
cmd = show { deny .* }
cmd = show { permit .* }
cmd = copy { permit .* }
cmd = ping { permit .* }
cmd = enable { permit .* }
cmd = configure { deny .* }
cmd = disable { permit .* }
cmd = telnet { permit .* }
cmd = disconnect { permit .* }
cmd = where { permit .* }
cmd = set { permit .* }
cmd = clear { permit line }
cmd = exit { permit .* }
cmd = debug { permit .* }
group = advanced {
default service = deny
cmd = show { permit .* }
cmd = copy { permit flash }
cmd = copy { permit running }
cmd = ping { permit .* }
cmd = configure { permit .* }
cmd = enable { permit .* }
cmd = disable { permit .* }
cmd = telnet { permit .* }
cmd = disconnect { permit .* }
cmd = where { permit .* }
cmd = set { permit .* }
cmd = clear { permit line }
cmd = exit { permit .* }
cmd = interface { permit .* }
group = admin {
default service = permit
As you can see, admin can access everything,
readonly can only read. Advanced can make
limited changes and admin can do everything.
On the Cisco router, I have the following
configuration:
aaa authentication login notac none
aaa authentication login VTY group tacacs+ local
aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable
aaa authorization console
aaa authorization config-commands
aaa authorization exec notac none
aaa authorization exec VTY group tacacs+ if-authenticated none
aaa authorization commands 0 VTY group tacacs+ if-authenticated none
aaa authorization commands 1 VTY group tacacs+ if-authenticated none
aaa authorization commands 15 VTY group tacacs+ if-authenticated none
aaa authorization network VTY group tacacs+ if-authenticated none
aaa accounting exec VTY start-stop group tacacs+
aaa accounting commands 0 VTY start-stop group tacacs+
aaa accounting commands 1 VTY start-stop group tacacs+
aaa accounting commands 15 VTY start-stop group tacacs+
aaa accounting network VTY start-stop group tacacs+
aaa accounting connection VTY start-stop group tacacs+
I find that by doing it this way, it is much
more scalable than using privilege commands
on the router itself.
David
CCIE Security

Install on SDCard/USB stick, toggle read-only filesystem - possible?

This is something I thought about while installing Arch on an SD card earlier. You know these small switches on some SD cards that make them read-only, right?
Would it be possible to have a setup where Archlinux is installed on a rewritable storage device like an USB Stick or an SD card, where one mode of operation would be to use it like a regular, persisting Arch install (with writeable filesystem). The second mode would be to use it similar to a Live CD, not persisting any data on the storage device and using RAM instead (mounting the root filesystem as read-only).
Basically, you could boot into regular mode (perhaps by choosing a seperate entry in GRUB), change configurations, update packages, etc. Then you reboot into read-only mode and use it as a Live CD with any changes to the filesystem stored only in RAM. This could be combined with system encryption to provide a secure and portable Arch installation that can be kept up-to date and simply by rebooting, you have a protected, volatile environment similar to a Live CD.
Is something like that possible? Has it been done already?

Comment on the "why" for Flash Device....quiet operation, less power required, faster performance and reduced size.
Faster boot time is also possible with raid applied.
As previously stated, running all in ram doesn't provide any performance improvement if the system has at least 2GB of ram. Thus the use of swap is not required with that much ram.
This principle also applies to Flash Devices which have algortithms controlling the writes across the entire card capacity such that larger capacity increases lifetime expectancy.
Copy- on- write is also proposed for flash devices which reduces the process steps for writing to flash.
In my experience with running-in-ram with CTKArch "live" system, I found not much to endorse using that mode. A negative of good proportion is the copy-to-ram loading time , which cannot be avoided.
Basically, faster ram is the best approach for performance enhancement in all systems.
Thus, there are herein some reasons for using flash in an arch booting system whether "live" or conventional or raid based.
My raid0 bootable system was outlined in previous post and am using it now. It is not a USB connected bus arrangement which inherently limits performance.
I find Compact Flash in UDMA or true IDE mode to provide good performance speed of 90mb/s read and 25mb/s write to be a fine alternative to hard drives. In raid0 read speed is doubled. Good reason for flash devices but not in usb mode.

Create Read Only User in Oracle 10.2.0.4

Hi., Friends,
I want to create an user in Oracle 10.2.0.4 with read only rights of my hole database. I am not having Enterprise Manager Console so i want create from command prompt.Can u please explain me the step for create and assign read only role to user.
Regards
Mahendran

Hi Mahendra,
I am happy with Surendrajain's reply, but with this sql you will not able to view the data present in SAP Schema,
The entire sql query with the comments in bracket is given below
1) create user PPMTEST identified by program1;
2) Create role PPMROLE;                           { PPMROLE is the role name which will be later assigned to the user PPMTEST}
3) Grant CONNECT to PPMROLE;                                 { CONNECT role allows the user to connect to oracle database}
4) Grant SELECT_CATALOG_ROLE to PPMROLE;       { SELECT_CATALOG_ROLE role allows the user to view the oracle data dictionary}
5) GRANT SELECT ANY TABLE to PPMROLE;             { "SELECT ANY TABLE" privilege allows the user to view the table which is present in the SAP schema}
6) Grant PPMROLE to PPMTEST;                                         { Assigning the role PPMROLE to the user PPMTEST}
7) COMMIT;
Thanks and Regards
Debdeep

Render column read only after save in advanced table.

I have advanced table in my region. Right now, I have col1 & col2 both messageinputtext and adding new row works,
This is what I want to do :
When page loads, render col1 read only, (right now it pulls in data, with col1 as text field, I dont want the user to change data in col1, once he has saved it)
When user presses addRow button in table footer, it adds a row with col1 as input field, but when user is done inputting and clicks 'apply changes' button , col1 in all the rows become read only.
how can I do it programatically ?
thanks

Now You have to capture the logic of AddRow button. Say you are handling its logic in AMImpl.
PFR of Controller:-->
processFormRequest
if ((table.Bean.getName().equals(source)) && (ADD_ROWS_EVENT.equals(event)))
// invoke method on view instance that will add 5 rows
In AMimpl:-
if (vo.getFetchedRowCount() == 0)
// We want to initialize the VO with the call to setMaxFetchSize()
// only before we add the first row. If we add subsequent rows,
// we don't want to call this again, which is way it's enclosed
// in the IF check.
vo.setMaxFetchSize(0);
// Perform insert
Row row = vo.createRow();
vo.insertRow(row);
// If this view object is transactional, you must also comply with
// Model Coding Standard M69 by setting the new row state to
// STATUS_INITIALIZED. Note that there is no harm in including
// this line of code in non-transactional view objects if you
// find it easier to follow a single coding pattern for all your
// view objects.
row.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED);
vo.reset();
vo.next();
Here try to do like this
OARow row = (OARow)vo.getCurrentRow;
OAViewObject pVO = (OAViewObject)findViewObject("macsfaqPVO1");
OARow poRow = (OARow)pVO.getCurrentRow();
poRow.setAttribute("QuestionColFlag", Boolean.FALSE);
Thanks
--Anil

IFolder shared read only folder issue

I have a 3.8.4 ifolder that I shared with another user but only gave him read only rights to it. He can still go in and edit any file I put in there and save cha ges to the file. The changes will not sync back to my folder but we now have the same doc with different ainformatin in it. That is not what I call read only!Has anyone else seen this behavior?Dan

Dchunt,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

CDR Admin Read Only rights

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for