CE520 server teaming?

Hi,
I'm trying to get a Catalyst Express 520G switch to form a team with a server but no traffic is flowing.
If the two ports connecting to the server are set as switch ports you can set up the etherchannel and it shows as up on both ends but I can't get traffic to go over the link.
The server is a OSX 10.6 box so is using LACP bonding and it happily sees the link as up but you can not ping the server.  We have similar set ups on 3560 switches which work OK so I'm not sure if it is a limitation of the CE500s or I have the wrong smartport or other setting.  Though from the docs the only smartport that can make an etherchannel is the switch one. Any chance of getting a server team role?
Help :-)
Thanks
Nick

Hi,
thanks for the prompt reply.
The 3560 config for one bond is..
benefitz-sw2#sh run int gi 0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 146 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description etherchannel link 1
switchport mode access
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
end
benefitz-sw2#sh run int gi 0/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 146 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description etherchannel link 1
switchport mode access
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
end
benefitz-sw2#sh run int po 1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 55 bytes
interface Port-channel1
switchport mode access
end
benefitz-sw2#
I did some more testing and found I can get the MAC address in the ARP table for the bond but no response on ping or open ports. So maybe the problem is a service order problem so I'll cehck that one out further. Is there anyway to find out exactly how the port is set with the switch smartport setting? I'll read ovr the doc you mention as well.
Thanks
Nick

Similar Messages

  • Can Sharepoint 2013 Server Team Site page layout be changed to have the same page layout as Sharepoint's previous version?

    Hello Community
        Using WS2012 and Sharepoint 2013 Server you can add a
    Calendar to a page.
        The problem is that Sharepoint 2013 Server's default "Team Site"
    page is not setup with a box on the far right of the page and 2 boxes in the
    middle (one above the other) where you could insert web parts into
    those boxes.
        So the question is when you use Sharepoint 2013 Server "Team Site"
    page (if not is there any other site page) where you can have a box
    on the far right of the page and 2 boxes in the middle of the page
    (one above the other) so that you can insert web parts into those boxes
    (as the previous version of Sharepoint's default page was setup) and if so
    how?
        Thank you
        Shabeaut

    Hi Shabeaut,
    Based on your description, my understanding is that you want to change the text layout for the home page of the team site as it was in SharePoint 2010.
    If I misunderstood, please feel free to correct me.
    I recommend to edit the home page and then click Text Layout in the ribbon on Format Text tab, then select the text layout you need.
    Best regards,
    Victoria
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Setup Team Foundation Server - Team Site Collection - SharePoint Web Application Settings failed with error TF205014, TF250025

    Hi
    I have TFS server installed and working with other SharePoint farm.  (TFS installed,  SharePoint extension installed and Granted Access for TFS.
    When Setup TFS - SharePoint Web Application Settings,  It ask for the three values:
    Web Application URL:  
    Central Administration URL:
    Default Location of team project collection sites:
    What notice about the TFS sites that are working is that they are Path Based Site Collection.  Created with SharePoint Web Application managed path (like
    http://spserver/sites/tfs_site1) and so it easy to see it will work.
    Web Application URL:  http://spserver
    CA URL :   http://spserver:portnumber
    Default Location :  Sites or any managed path
    We start using Host Name Site Collection (HNSC) to get the benefit of multiple unique site name without having multiple web application for each.  Work great but when we tried to setup and extend TFS service on the HNSC, we could
    not get them to work and got errors when trying different variation of path URL.
    After doing lot of searching on this, I came up pretty empty and I don't know if that is possible so my question is Have anyone able to setup TFS to work with SharePoint 2013 Host Name Site Collection?  
    If you have, a simple yes will be great but please share or even if anyone think it is possible or not possible, please share too.
    Thanks in advance for any comment / suggestion.
    Swanl

    Hi  Swanl,
    I’m afraid that we cannot setup TFS to work  with SharePoint 2013 Host Name Site Collection.
    Also you can  initial a new thread in Visual Studio Team Foundation Server forums:
    Team Foundation Server – General: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/home?forum=tfsgeneral
    More experts for Team Foundation Server will assist you, then you will get more information relation to your issue.
    For integrating SharePoint 2013 with Team Foundation Server 2013 you can have a look at the following blog:
    http://nakedalm.com/integrate-sharepoint-2013-with-team-foundation-server-2013/
    Thanks,
    Eric
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support,
    contact [email protected]
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • UCS C 220 server teaming on two core switches.

    Hello Everyone,
    I am using UCS C 220 M3 server and it has 8 HDD. I created RAID for redundancy and installed call manager custom software on it. Now in the network topology there are two core switches. I connected the UCS server on first core switch from Gig port 1 of the server.
    Now client is Demanding to connect on other core switch also. I am aware of the concept of teaming and i did it many times on microsoft server but either on the single switch or on the VSS system
    Here the scenario is core switch 1 and cor switch 2 are two seperate device. Indeed there is a ether channel between them but these switches are not virtual.
    Kindly suggest the solution how i can achieve the redundancy for UCS 220 server.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Please reply.

    Hello again, Im stuck
    This is what I have done. I have created the vPC between my esx host and my two nexus 5000 switches, but it doesnt seem to come up:
    S02# sh port-channel summary
    Flags:  D - Down        P - Up in port-channel (members)
            I - Individual  H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
            s - Suspended   r - Module-removed
            S - Switched    R - Routed
            U - Up (port-channel)
            M - Not in use. Min-links not met
    Group Port-       Type     Protocol  Member Ports
          Channel
    4     Po4(SD)     Eth      LACP      Eth1/9(D)
    vPC info:
    S02# sh vpc 4
    vPC status
    id     Port        Status Consistency Reason                     Active vlans
    4      Po4         down*  success     success                    -
    vPC config:
    interface port-channel4
      switchport mode trunk
      switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,27,30,50,100,500-501
      spanning-tree port type edge trunk
      vpc 4
    interface Ethernet1/9
      switchport mode trunk
      switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,27,30,50,100,500-501
      spanning-tree port type edge trunk
      channel-group 4 mode active
    Im unsure what I must configure on the cisco 240M3(esx host) side to make this work. I only have the two default interfaces(eth0 and eth1) on the vic-1225 installed in the esx host, and both have the vlan mode is set to TRUNK.
    Any ideas on what I am missing?
    Message was edited by: HDA

  • Thank you, Web Server team!

    Good morning, all!
    I just wanted to let everyone that uses the Sun Java System Web Server along with Netbeans know that Netbeans 6.8 was released today, and the Web Server 7 plugin is already available for download!
    Kudos to whomever is responsible for this...your work is greatly appreciated.
    Bill

    I think you already need to have some SJSWS server definitions.. I just followed the exact steps you listed (install nb 6.8, install sjsws plugin, select Tools / Servers) and no window appears.. the key factor here: I told it to import my nb 6.7 settings which includes some sjsws server definitions. I had this same problem when sjsws plugin was first available for nb 6.5. I looked back at that thread ( http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5349413 ) and saw mention of particular java versions.. so I should mention I used Java 6u13 with nb 6.7, but when I installed nb 6.8 I switched to 6u17. (both on Solaris 10 sparc)

  • Duplicate Client IP Address Matching Teamed Adapter on Server

    I am experiencing a problem with a client's WLAN and client IP address conflicts.
    Basically every wireless client reports a problem that it is having an IP Address conflict with another device on the network (wired).
    The device in mention is a Dell Server with Teamed network cards. They have three of them and clients are reporting conflicts with all three.
    On investigating further there is no address conflict as the "Teamed Adapter" has a completly different network address (static) and the wireless clients are using the internal WLC DHCP server in a different range. (although it is all one flat network).
    The clients report that there is an address conflict, the MAc that it gives is the Teamed Server but the IP address is only its own and not on the Teamed Adapter.
    Has anyone seen this before or had a problem with "Teamed Adapters" on servers.
    Our environment is:
    WLC 4402-50 running 5.2.178
    Flat Network.
    Thanks

    Hi Roman,
    thanks for your reply.
    Basically what i have found is that it Servers running Microsoft Windows 2003 or Windows 2000, that have teamed NICs using Broadcom Advanced Server Programs (BASP) in an active/active team, respond to other server's gratuitous ARP packet with an incorrect IP address. The Microsoft Windows server will respond to the other server sending the gratuitous ARP, with the Microsoft Windows server team MAC address, but with the other server's IP address in the sender field of the packet. This causes the other system to respond as if there is a duplicate IP on the network.
    Fix is to upgrade to BASP driver version 6.2.32, or newer. This version of the BASP driver was first included with the Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet Software.
    An upgrade of the drivers apprently will fix this issue althouh i have tried it on 3 servers with this ocnfiguration and it fixed it for two of them.
    The work around is to disable the active/active NIC team and use an active/standby team instead.
    Someone else on this forum must of come across this before i am sure?
    Anyway if it does resolve the issue i will post it back here so that anyone else in the future with this problem has a resolution!!
    thanks

  • HP Prolient DL380 G6 server. Having Teaming Duplex setting issue

    I have upgraded NIC driver and firmware and also upgraded latest NCU teaming software on our DL380 G6 windows 2k8 R2 server. 
    We unable to ping to server either by name or IP address, however RDP sessoin for this server are works fine, and also we can access the server shared files as well.. but problem is just for pinging failed.
    for additianal information,
    Core server Team, 100/full (both the NIC)
    Hyper-V Team 1000/full and 100/full
    All 4 NICs selected as Auto in duplex settings. when i do any changes in Core server teaming then able to get ping resoponse from server but this was just 5 to 6 packets response after the RTO comes continuously.
    please Advice... 
    Thanks
    SomnathC

    Hi:
    You may also want to post your question on the HP Business Support Forum  -- DL Servers section.
    http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/ProLiant-Servers-ML-D​L-SL/bd-p/itrc-264#.Uqh4Uul3u9I

  • Search Problem with SharePoint 2010: Get Internal server error when doing search

    Hi,
    Am getting Internal server error, corelation id.. when I use the search functionality in SP2010. 
    I've installed Sharepoint 2010 trial version on windows server 2008 r2 and the database server used is a SQL server 2008 R2.
    I got the following messages with ULs viewer for the relative Corelation ID:
    Process
    Product
    Category
    Level
    Message
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Foundation
    Monitoring
    High
    Leaving Monitored Scope (Search Statistics). Execution Time=404.4175
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Server
    General
    Medium
    Constructed a new async cache named Location Configuration Cache
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Server Search
    Administration
    High
    'SharePoint_SearchApplicationProxy', location cache: 
    Refreshing location cache
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Server Search
    Administration
    High
    SharePoint_SearchApplicationProxy', location cache: Exception while fetching
    location configuration data. StackTrace: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPEndpointAddress
    NotFoundException: There are no addresses available for this application.    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPRoundRobinServiceLoadBalancer.BeginOperation()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceApplicationProxy.
    GetLocationConfigurations(Int64& lastUpdate, Boolean& useCrawlProxy)    
    at
    Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.LocationConfigurationCollection.
    PopulateCollection()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.
    LocationConfigurationCollection.Init()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.
    Administration.LocationConfigurationCollection..ctor(SearchServiceApplicationProxy
    searchAdmin)    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.LocationCache.
    FetchLocationConfigurationData()
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Server Search
    Query
    Unexpected
    CoreResultsWebPart::OnInit: Exception initializing: System.NullReferenceException:
    Object reference not set to an instance of an object.    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.
    Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.SetPropertiesOnQueryReader()    
    at
    Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.OnInit(EventArgs e)
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Server Search
    Query
    Exception
    Internal server error exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference
    not set to an instance of an object.    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls
    .CoreResultsWebPart.SetPropertiesOnQueryReader()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.
    Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.OnInit(EventArgs e) System.
    NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.
    SetPropertiesOnQueryReader()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.
    CoreResultsWebPart.OnInit(EventArgs e)
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Server
    Unified Logging Service
    Monitorable
    Watson bucket parameters: SharePoint Server 2010, ULSException14, 06175311
    "sharepoint server search", 0e00129b "14.0.4763.0", 17853a8f "microsoft.
    office.server.search", 0e00129a "14.0.4762.0", 4bad937d "sat mar 27 09:11:25
    2010", 0000320d "0000320d", 0000002d "0000002d", 4a6d3421 "nullreferenceexception"
    , 67316a39 "g1j9"
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Foundation
    Monitoring
    High
    Leaving Monitored Scope (Search Action Links OnInit). Execution Time=395.3955
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Foundation
    Monitoring
    High
    Leaving Monitored Scope (Add WebPart with error#4). Execution Time=527.8118
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Foundation
    Monitoring
    High
    Leaving Monitored Scope (Add WebParts). Execution Time=3601.2636
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    Web Content Management
    Publishing
    Medium
    Caught a thread abort exception in TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest,
    the exception may be expected. stack trace=  
    at System.Web.UI.Page.
    ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean
    includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)    
    at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()    
    at
    System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)    
    at ASP.SEARCHRESULTS_ASP
    X__1518441470.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.
    Publishing.TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
    w3wp.exe (0x1808)
    SharePoint Foundation
    Monitoring
    Medium
    Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://nestestsp:25943/Pages/results.aspx
    ?k=home%20nesintranet)). Execution Time=3811.6724
    Can anybody help me find a solution for this issue.
    Thanks

    After making sure that all services are up and running,  I had to deactive and activate the "SharePoint Server Site Search" web site collection feature.  Then the search started working for the time being. 
    However, it throws the error again after 8 to 9 hours.  This has been happening for last couple of weeks.  I also came to know from my windows server team that they moved the AD from one place to another.  Since then I am having this issue. 
    The log file has the following error:
    CoreResultsWebPart::OnInit: Exception initializing: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.SetPropertiesOnQueryReader()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.OnInit(EventArgs e)
    Internal server error exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.SetPropertiesOnQueryReader()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.OnInit(EventArgs e) System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.SetPropertiesOnQueryReader()    
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.CoreResultsWebPart.OnInit(EventArgs e)
    Harish Vajja

  • Project Server 2010 / Sharepoint 2010 Permissions not syncing to Project Site

    Project Permissions not syncing to Project Site
    Project Manager Group
    New project is created and published project server sends permissions to Sharepoint which puts users into the following groups:
    <dir><dir></dir></dir><dir><dir>
    Web Administrator (Microsoft Project Server)
    Project Managers (Microsoft Project Server)
    Team members (Microsoft Project Server)
    Readers (Microsoft Project Server)
    At this time the creator/owner, owner’s management, portfolio managers, and executives should all have Project Manager rights on the sharepoint site, and Admins will have Web Admin permissions.
    Issue #1: Only the Web Admin permissions and creator/owner permissions are being added to the Sharepoint permission groups
    Workaround #1: Going into the project site permissions and adding the
    Project Managers (Microsoft Project Server) group manually and the sync will keep the permissions
    Workaround #2: Going into the Server Settings, Manager Groups then removing or add all users to the No Permission Group, which forces an sync to all workspaces. Con: This workaround can only be down at night when users are not active since it will
    block the queue for at least an hour.
    Project Owner Transfer
    Previously created project has owner change, once saved and published project server sends permissions to update user’s permission to
    Project Managers (Microsoft Project Server) on Sharepoint project site.
    Issue #2: When Project owner is changed and project is published the owner is not getting permissions to the Sharepoint project site. However, if owner is also added to the team using the Build Team Feature the sync will give the owner Project
    Manager permissions on the Project Site.
    Workaround #1: Going into Server Settings, Project Sites, select project and Synchronize. Once this is done, the owner will have Project Manager Permissions without being added to the team.
    Users who have been added to this project in Project Server 2010, but not assigned to tasks. Users who have assignments in this project in Project Server 2010 and are contributors to the project workspace site,
    meaning that they can create and edit documents, issues, and risks. Users who have published this project or who have
    Save Project permission in Project Web App and are contributors to the project workspace site, meaning that they can create and edit documents, issues, and risks. Users who have
    Manage SharePoint Foundation permission in Project Web App and are contributors to the project workspace site, meaning that they can create and edit documents, issues, and risks.</dir></dir>

    By default when you create project build team add users in the task and publish the project plan then All the User which are available in the project plan including Project owner will go to below mentioned group in project site:
    1. creator/owner, owner’s management, portfolio managers, and executives should all have Project Manager will get access to Project Managers (Microsoft Project Server)
    2. User who are having team member access to PWA will get Team members (Microsoft Project Server) access if they are assigned to the project task.
    3. User who are having team member access to PWA will get Readers (Microsoft Project Server) access if they are not assigned to the project task.
    4. Only PWA Administrator will get the access to Web Administrator (Microsoft Project Server)
    Sharepoint permission you have to use when you want to give permission manually to users on project site  
    In the Project Site provisioning setting under Server setting if you have Check to automatically synchronize Project Web App users with Project Sites when they are created, when project managers publish projects, and when user permissions change in Project
    Server.
    Then all the user get access as per describe above and if you will give access manually to any of the user either in project server group or in Sharepoint group once you will publish the project next time all the manually given permission will go away.
    IF you want to give permission to user manually to sharepoint group or project server group then uncheck automatically synchronize Project Web App users with Project Sites when they are created, when project managers publish projects, and when user permissions
    change in Project Server.
    You check PWA site setting --> Site permission then member of Sharepoint group user who will have access to sharepoint group in PWA site setting site permission will have access to all the project site sharepoint group as Project site inherit permission
    from PWA root site.
    Both the issue which you have described is behavior of project site.
    For issue 2 when first time project owner create and publish the project and projectsite is getting created then porject owner name gets access  in the porject manager (project server group) nect time if you will change the owner and publish the project
    until he will not present in the project plan will not get the permission.
    If you want to give sharepoint permission to users then uncheck automatically synchronize Project Web App users with Project Sites when they are created, when project managers publish projects, and when user permissions change in Project Server and give
    the permission manually. 
    Project site in 2010 has some issue and not full filling customer need some time ,Ms has came up with 2013 which is having tight integration with project sites .
    Project workspace security groups are equal to the SharePoint Server 2010 security groups.
    Web Administrator equals Full Control
    Project Managers equals Design
    Team members equals Contribute
    Readers equals Read
    Users who have Manage
    SharePoint Foundation permission in Project Web App and are contributors to the project workspace site, meaning that they can
    create and edit documents, issues, and risks will get access to Web Administrator (Microsoft Project Server)
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc197668(v=office.14).aspx
    kirtesh

  • Crystal Reports Moved from one file server to another - very slow opening

    Hello,
    I am new here, and I am in need of a solution. If I am not in the correct forum, please advise.
    Our crystal reports were moved from an old file server to a new file server.  Once the old file server was shut down the reports opened very slow in Designer and in our 3rd party application.  Our server team determined that the reports are still attempting to connect to the old file server.  If the old file server is brought online or dns is changed to reflect another machine that it can make a connection to, it opens with no delay. 
    For some reason, not every report is affected.  Most of the reports are Crystal 8.5, but I have some Crystal XI reports that do the same thing.  I can't find any reference in the reports to any file server/location....
    I need to resolve this issue on the Crystal 8.5 version due to the application that we are running.
    Is there a way to fix this other than to recreate the reports (I have over 400 of them)?
    Any assistance or advice is appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Nancy

    Hi Nancy,
    The server info still needs to be updated. Are you setting location for each subreport also?
    Possibly this registry key will help, I only have CR 2008 installed so you'll have adjust for what ever you are using:
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Business Objects\Suite 12.0\Crystal Reports\DatabaseOptions - VerifyStoredProceduresOnFirstRefresh = No
    and
    VerifyStoredProceduresOnSetLocation = No
    And
    VerifyWhenDBDriverUpgraded = No
    And
    ViewOutOfPlaceSubreports = No
    Close CR designer before making any changes. And the usual warning about modifying the registry.
    Thank you
    Don

  • Receiver SAP SFTP adapter-errorlog on SFTP server

    Experts,
    I am using receiver SAP SFTP adapter to connect to an SFTP server and send files.Receiver SFTP server is a VMS system.I could able to write the files to home directory of the user that has been given,but apart from writing the files I am seeing warning log file in the the target folder on SFTP server like below description.I am giving dot(.) in the file path to write the files to the default directory that has been assigned to the user given by receiver SFTP server team.
    WARNING: ssh_file_server_receive_proc: platform cannot stat() filename /home/dir1/dir2 ./TestFile(TestFile is my file name) .
    Just to test,we placed files in the receiver SFTP server using same user and password as the PI recv SFTP channel with command line and winsCP client tool,but we don't see any error logs on the server with WinSCP tool or command line transfer of the files.Log file with above  warning is generating only when we place files on the server using SAP SFTP adapter in the recv channel of PI.
    Please let me know,if you have any insight or seen similar issue.
    Thank you,
    Sri

    Hi Poonam - Blogs on SFTP : Just search for SFTP and filter by blogs/documents.. you can find many..
    >>> http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/305eeb5b-81e7-2f10-d8aa-9216de04ca3e?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&57075820413417
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-35572
    I read in some of the SDN forum that SFTP adapter doesnt have the capability to read the files from multiple directories. So, if we get any requirement to read the files from multiple directories using sftP, why could be a possible solution for this requirement?
    >>> Yes. It is only possible with NFS.
    You have to define multiple channels/interfaces...

  • High PREEMPTIVE_SP_SERVER_DIAGNOSTICS wait time in sql server 2014 server

    I am seeing high waittimes for PREEMPTIVE_SP_SERVER_DIAGNOSTICS and the server is runninf with high cpu.
    What could have triggered this high waittime, how can this be fixed,
    WaitType Wait_S
    Resource_S Signal_S
    WaitCount Percentage
    AvgWait_S AvgRes_S
    AvgSig_S
    PREEMPTIVE_SP_SERVER_DIAGNOSTICS 1655043.72
    1655043.72 0.00
    4 39.75
    413760.9305 413760.9305
    0.0000
    PREEMPTIVE_OS_PIPEOPS 935157.21
    935157.21 0.00
    343445 22.46
    2.7229 2.7229
    0.0000
    CXPACKET 259912.58
    250608.73 9303.85
    25115286 6.24
    0.0103 0.0100
    0.0004
    PAGEIOLATCH_SH 206350.14
    205563.18 786.96
    37649420 4.96
    0.0055 0.0055
    0.0000
    SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD 139263.91
    2430.27 136833.63
    293382681 3.35
    0.0005 0.0000
    0.0005

    Hello,
    I remember I read a user complaining about high waits on PREEMPTIVE_SP_SERVER_DIAGNOSTICS when he installed CU5 for SQL
    Server 2012 SP1, but in your scenario you have a SQL Server 2014 with CU1 (build 2342). I am treating this as a bug and that is the reason I would like you to consider applying CU5, the latest cumulative update, to see if that solves the issue.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/3011055/en-us
    This is the first time I read about this happening on SQL Server 2014 though.
    I would like to suggest you to create a Connect item too, to see if the SQL Server team can suggest you another way to
    treat this issue.
    https://connect.microsoft.com/sqlServer/
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • Data Migration from SQL server best option

    Hi all,
    I am importing data from SQL server to oracle server, both of them are on different machines. I had suggested DTS to be most viable option to do so, the SQL server team needs to know why DTS, here are the other options that i am aware of
    1) Flat files ---delimited flat files data can be loaded into tables using external table since we have oracle 9i
    2) using generic connectivity, but it requires changes in configuration files which our dba doesnt apporve , since he says that wud be lot of monitoring and maintenance when there are database upgrades
    3) DBlink-- i dont know whether dblink works for oracle to sql server, i think it doesnt work?? correct me if am wrong
    and the last is DTS
    it wud be of great help if i could know that in such a scenario how good is DTS compared to other options in terms of speed, maintenance and monitoring, also if there are any other options to import the data.
    the volume of data is large abt 500000 one time load and then abt 8000 records on a daily basis
    thanks
    abhishek

    2 & 3 are really the same thing. Generic Connectivity allows you to create a database link from Oracle to SQL Server.
    SQL Server also has the concept of a linked server that is analgous to Generic Connectivity that would allow you to connect from SQL Server to Oracle and push the changes over.
    There are a variety of other ETL tools out there that can handle this sort of thing (Oracle's is Oracle Warehouse Builder (OWB)) in addition to DTS as well.
    Personally, I would prefer Generic Connectivity, but that's just me. At one client site, we pull millions of records out of a DB2 database every night and haven't had any issues related to the stability of Generic Connectivity. Realistically, migrating 8000 rows a night is going to be pretty easy no matter what route you take, so it really comes down to what standards your organization has for data transfer and what sort of skillset the developers are going to have.
    Justin

  • Annoucing a few complimentary copies of Sun Web Server: Essentials Guide

    Dear Sun Web Server user,
    As you may have heard, found it on amazon.com or stumbled on it in the local book store like Borders or Barnes & Noble, there is a new book on Sun Web Server technology. If you haven't, no worries. Please refer to [t-5406033] or visit the [Essential Guide's web site|http://www.sunwebserver.com/].
    We are now pleased to announce availability of a few complimentary copies of the Essential Guide. We'll be raffling away the copies in the next few months. If you are interested in a free copy of the book, please read further to enter the raffle.
    It's easy to enter the raffle and get started:
    Step 1: If you haven't already done so, download, install and register.
    Step 2: Write a review of Sun Web Server product on Web Server's official page [1], and
    Step 3: Send us an email webserver at sun dot com, confirming your Step 1 along with a link to your review (Step 2).
    What happens next?
    We'll raffle at least a copy once in a month and the winner(s) will be notified. With may share the raffle results on with a permission from the lucky winners. If you are interested, get started today!
    [1] [Sun Web Server's official page|http://www.sun.com/webserver/].
    Disclaimer: Please note that the raffle is organized by the author(s), and that Sun Microsystems or Pearson Media - the publishers of The Essential Guide - are not responsible for the raffle.

    Hi mv,
    I probably mis-spoke. It is not so much the features that are missing in Sun Web Server, as it is the availability of additional user plugins. However, that being said, I chose Sun Web Server over Apache because of security and performance. I realize additional plugins could adversely affect both of those. I have emailed Sun marketing about a specific feature for Web Dav I would like to see. This would make things much easier for people who would like to do mass hosting virtual hosting. Most of the real valuable features that gave Apache an edge, the web server team has added in version 7. I have pasted a portion of the letter I emailed to Sun marketing below about Web Dav, and my logic behind it. This as well as being able to hook the user system into standard open source databases makes for a broader solution appeal. I realize I only have one view of the market, and these are just my two cents. :-) Thanks!
    TonyZ
    **** Letter ******
    I was introduced to Sun Web Server several years ago when we began looking at moving servers away from Microsoft technology and also bringing them into our facility. As a network and sys admin, I evaluated using different web servers out there as we had a few years to work on this project to ensure uptime and reliability. Initially, I found Sun Web Server quite confusing and looked at Apache. However, after the web interface was retooled, I found Sun Web Server quite simple and refreshing to use. Since we have to be CISP compliant for the credit card industry, security was very important to us. Not only from a code standpoint, but also from an accidental misconfiguration standpoint. In my opinion, Sun Web Server out shines Apache and other alternatives by a long shot.
    As far as the WebDav feature, what I have been looking at is how to expand and offer hosting and web services. I currently work for a small company which retails products on the web, and I also contribute to a few open source projects. Currently, I am working with http://www.mynajs.org/. We have been discussing how we could offer hosting for people wanting to try out the project. Hosting companies using Linux typically have deep hooks into the Linux operating system for managing users. For hosting, you have a whole specialized Linux stack with specialized disk quotas, users, ftp server with users based on Linux users, and mail. From my standpoint, while this works, it can become a nightmare as far as updates, system administration, patching, etc. For a business ROI, and technology footprint, this doesn't make sense. There are control panels out there that take care of some of this, but now you have another whole layer of technology to troubleshoot. If I do not want to use the Linux/Apache stack, and if I am using Java, and do not want to add Tomcat as well, what do I use? With Sun Web Server, I get the best of both worlds, one install, one piece of software, operating system separation, blazingly fast speed, out of the box clustering, one interface for management, standard serving as well as Java, and WebDav so that now I can eliminate an ftp server and reduce my footprint for security and maintenance headaches. One neat package. However, now I still have to manage and restrict users. How to do this using Sun Web Server? Right now, I have to either run an ftp server with quotas built in, or go back to the Linux operating system and work with specialized scripts an maintenance. In theory, if Sun Web Server had quotas, I have my user system with the controls I need. At the very least, if there were hooks to the WebDav system to perform custom processing on certain events, it would leave the door open for greater control of the user and system. Now if we want to offer a hosting solution, whether it be online storage, web hosting, or Java hosting, or social site, all we need is one product, Sun Web Server! With all of its features for enhancing performance, security, and much more. I might also add, that for a small companies, Sun Web Server has been a pretty much set it and forget it solution. It has been my experience for our servers to run pretty much without intervention once they are setup. With the watch dog process, if there is a problem, it is rarely noticed except for the admin watching the logs. Technically, I am not sure why anyone would choose something different than Sun Web Server. Apache is the hosting standard, but it is really Apache plus Linux. With a few more user features, I think Sun Web Server could replace the whole Apache/Linux stack, the Apache/Linux/Tomcat stack, outshine those solutions on heavy loads and high end features, and offer better ROI.

  • Can we make server fingerprint field optional instead on mandatory in SFTP adapter

    Dear All,
    We are integrating SAP HCM with Success-factor only for Employee profile as client is only using the "SF PMS" module.
    ABAP program(installed through SH addOn provided by SAP) is generating the Employee profile ".csv" file.
    I am developing a bypass scenario to transfer that ''.csv" file to SuccessFactors SFTP server. However, SuccessFactors SFTP server team is not ready to provide me their "server fingerprint", and they are claiming this info is not required to develop interface in PI. The Authentication mode in SFTP communication channel is "Password" based instead of "Private key".
    Experts please help me understand is there any possibility to make this field optional? if not what else I can try here?
    Thanks,
    Farhan

    Hi Farthan,
    Server Fingerprint is the mandatery field to fonfigure the SFTP adapter. kindly check with your admin team to login thorough CoreFTP, it will be genarte and display the Server fingerpring.
    please go through the below log.
    http://scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2012/04/11/sap-sftp-sender-adapter-a-quick-walkthrough
    Regards
    Srinivas

Maybe you are looking for