CEA AND CHA EXEMPTION

Hi
i am having some issue regarding the exemption of child education/hostel allowances. when i run payroll it doesnot calculate in payroll. i mean the cea/cha exemption. we have created it582 for both subtype.
any solution please

Hi,
Please check if you have maintained the tax code in table v_t7int9 for the same and Schema INN1
regards
Kiran
Edited by: kiran amrute on Mar 20, 2010 9:28 AM

Similar Messages

/ZF5 and TDS Exemption is not coming for custom PF contribution

Hi Friends,
Need help regarding the custom PF deduction, requirement is
IF GROSS - HRA < 6500 then *12%
IF GROSS - HRA > 6500 then Only BASIC * 12%
for this i written pcr and places in the schema also and in payslip PF amount's are coming correctly.
Now my problem is PF Tax exemption i.e., Agg. of Chapter VI is not taking and if retro (any arrears) CF PF is not coming.
can any one please tell how to get the Carry forward PF while in retro and PF exemption for TDS.
please tell PCR and in which Schema i has to add.
My Problem is CF PF is not coming and Exemption u/s 10 also not coming
Screen shots for what i have done:
PCR:
SCHEMA:
INN1 - Gross to Net Calculation
INAL - Monthly factoring and storage (cumul.of gross amount)
Thanks and Best Regards,
Praneeth kumar

Hi Friends,
My requirement is for only one PSA - TANA, PF Basis amount has to check the wage types Basic (2100) and Additional Allowances (3800).
logic is if Basic + Addl. Allowance is less than 6500, the 12% on Basic + Addl. Allownace
if Basic + Addl. Allowance is greater than 6500, the 12% on Basic wage type only.
I changed my PCR and while running the payroll, it is calculating the PF 12% and again 12% and storing in the wage types /3f1,/3f3......
problem is, pcr is checking the /111 EPF Basis and according to logic it is multiplying 12% on that amount. but i want the result like check the EPF Basis and do according to logic and store the values.
system behaving :
Basic - 7727
Allow - 1289
total = 9016
calculation: 7727*12% = 928
system is calculating = 928*12% = 111
PCR:
Payslip:
Best Regards,
Praneeth kumar

Customs and CHA charges

While creating the Import PO in the conditions TAB
But here to my client they want to add customs duties and CHA charges to be added on to the material cost.....
How to make it possible

Accoring to pravanesh, What actually he requires is not regarding the creation of procedure but its about how to add the cost of customs and CHA charges to the material cost.This exactly means inventorising the delivery charges.
For this the solution is you maintain only Accrual keys not the Account keys in the import pricing procedure for that conditions which you want its price to be added to material price.
And for the conditions of Customs and all other delivery charges in M/06 Tcode you need to uncheck the Accrual checkbox for that conditions you want to be added to material price.
But do not check the Accrual check box in those conditions which you want its price to be added to your material price since this is the control where we make the difference of adding the price to material or not.
Thanks.

Garnishabl Amount - Non exempt and Disposable net

Hi all ,
Can any please explain me in detail or forward me suitable material where I can gain enough knowledge on
this Garnishable amount using the Disposable net and Non exempt amounts.
Can anyone explain me with an example how we do the config for Disposable amount and Non exempt amount.
Thanks.
Edited by: Daniel Ben on Feb 28, 2008 5:57 PM

Adjusting the disposable net is done with processing class 59.
The following are valid values:
'1' Transfer to disposable net with same sign
2' Transfer to disposable net with sign reversed
3' Completely non-exempt, used for non-exempt garnishment refund wage types
4' Used for garnishments, used for exempt garnishment refund wage types
Processing class 60 determines whether the garnishment wage type should be saved in the results table.
The disposable net is the basis of calculation for garnishable amounts.
Disposable net is determined by values 1' and 2'.
If you need to create your own model to adjust disposable net, check the value of processing class 59 after copying your wage type(s) and adjust the value accordingly.
An Adjustment Model determines how the disposable net is to be adjusted to fit your company's requirements.
Within the Non-Exempt Amount section, you can define the different ways of determining the garnishable amount and how it is calculated .
The garnishable amount can be determine using the following:
Levy - You can indicate the exempt amount for a levy for each levy form. This is done by indicating for each form the number of filing status, exemptions, pay period, validity dates and the exempt amount.
Special Rules - Special rules for determining the garnishable amount can be stored. A special rule is used in cases where a model is not able to be used.
Federal Minimum Wage - You can indicate the minimum wage rate that is used in determining the garnishable amount in accordance with the Federal Minimum Wage.
The Model Non-Exempt is used to determine the garnishable amount. Here you can specify whether the minimum is exempt or non-exempt, a percentage or an amount, the federal minimum wage, and a Levy Form or Special Rule, if it applies.
Once a Model Non-Exempt is created, it is then attached to the Rule Non-Exempt to calculate the garnishable amount.

Hr exemption issue

there is a very complicated situation regarding children eductaion allowance inclusion in perk calculatio hope you can help me.
we are paying rs 300 as CEA AND person is having ony one child.
this means rs100 is exempt and rs 200 is taxable.
plus this rs 200 has to be used up for calculation of perk for coa/cla. but in our case this rs 200 is not being used up for calculation of perk value
sap is doing correct calculatio but picking wrong value
i.e /* value is not being used and instead of this /3 value is being used up.
how can we configure system to use up /* value and /3 value.

no one answered

Coveyance exemption amout exiding the limit 9600

Hi,
We are facing a problem regarding Car and conveyance exemption in under section -10 . in the month exemtion is giving 9600 hundred but when we are running payroll for next month it is exdiing the limit and coming as 98100.We have analysed .
/3c4 conveyance 01 01 = 1000 (conveyance amount exemption paid in that month)
/3c3 convey amt              = 1000\
/4e3 conveyance            = 9800
actually it is coming like this.
but it should come like
/3c4 conveyance 01 01    = 800(conveyance exemption paid in that month)
/3c3 convey amt              = 1000
/4e3 conveyance            = 9600
Kindly help
Laxman

Hi,
You will have to iplemnt SAP Note and upgrade Support pack, see the link
/4E3 (Annual Conveyance exemption is not coming correct)
this will help you.
Salil

HT1918 I went and tried to change my billing info , but it says that there is a problem with a purchase and to update my billing info. Is this why it won't let me delete my card info to none?

I'm basically locked out of the App Store from downloading and up dating. When I try to update or download anything a window pops up saying to check my billing info or that there was a billing problem, so when I tried to delete my NGO and cha ge it to none there was no option for that. So does this mean that I need to correct the problem first before I can have access to the App Store?

Yes. You need to correct the billing descrepancy before you can use the iTunes store. Write down what error you are getting, and open a support request at expresslane.apple.com for the iTunes store. They can check the issue and get a solution for you.

Problem with VPN by ASA 5505 and PIX 501

Hi
I have this scenario: Firewall ASA 5505, Firewall Pix 501 (with CatOS 6.3(5) ).
I have configured this appliance for Easy VPN (server is ASA) and PIX, and remote Access with Cisco client vpn (for internal lan ASA).
When i configure the ASA i have this problem, when i configure nat for easy vpn.
This is my nat configuration:
nat (inside) 0 access-list 100
nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outside
when i put this command:
nat (inside) 0 access-list no-nat
this command is necessary for configuration of easy vpn, but the previous nat:
nat (inside) 0 access-list 100
is replace with the latest command.

To identify addresses on one interface that are translated to mapped addresses on another interface, use the nat command in global configuration mode. This command configures dynamic NAT or PAT, where an address is translated to one of a pool of mapped addresses. To remove the nat command, use the no form of this command.
For regular dynamic NAT:
nat (real_ifc) nat_id real_ip [mask [dns] [outside] [udp udp_max_conns] [norandomseq]]
no nat (real_ifc) nat_id real_ip [mask [dns] [outside] [udp udp_max_conns] [norandomseq]]
For policy dynamic NAT and NAT exemption:
nat (real_ifc) nat_id access-list access_list_name [dns] [outside] [udp udp_max_conns] [norandomseq]
no nat (real_ifc) nat_id access-list access_list_name [dns] [outside] [udp udp_max_conns] [norandomseq]

Material valuation difference in FI and MM area for P.O in foreign Currency

Seek assistance in solving the following issues related to P.O in foreign currency. Thanks in advance
1, For purchase orders in foreign currency, during MIGO,in the FI document, the inventory value which include cost payable to the vendor, taxes, CHA and freight are calculated in foreign currency and the company code currency value is arrived by multiplying the total inventory value with the exchange rate prevailing in Ob08 on the posting date of MIGO, instead of adding the values of basic price converted to local currency at the rate prevailing on MIGO, Custom duty at the rate prevailing on Customs Miro and Freight CHA etc which are inputted in local currency and converted to P.O currency in P.,O, at the exchange rate in P.O
The value thus arrived is different from the actual value paid since the freight and CHA are in co code currency in the P.O and converted to P.O currency in P.O with exchange rate prevailing on the date of P.O and Custom duty paid in local currency is at the rate prevailing on Custom MIRO.
2, Freight and CHA are entered as condtions in the P.O and the values entered in local currency. These are converted to P.O currency by the system at the exchange rate prevailing on the P.O date. During MIGO in the FI document the values for these are arrived by multiplying the value in P.O currency with the exchange rate prevailing on MIGO. for e.g. the CHA lumpsum entered as INR 20,000 is converted to $ 400, assuming the OB08 rate on the date of P.O is 50. if on the date of MIGO OB08 is 60, during MIGO, in the FI document entry for local currency the CHA charges become 24000. ( 400 x 60 ). While the actual amount is 20,000. the same scenario exist for freight too which is entered in local currency.
WHAT IS HAPPENING
1. Foreign Vendor - Foreign Currency X OB08 rate on MIGO Posting Date
2. Freight - Company Code Currency Converted to Foreign Currency as per OB08 rate on PO Creation Date X OB08 rate on MIGO Date
3. CHA - Company Code Currency Converted to Foreign Currency as per OB08 rate on PO Creation Date X OB08 rate on MIGO Date
4. Customs - Company Code Currency Converted to Foreign Currency as per OB08 rate on Actual Customs Payment Date X OB08 rate on MIGO Date
WHAT IS REQUIRED
1. Foreign Vendor - Foreign Currency X OB08 rate on MIGO Posting Date
2. Freight - Company Code Currency Converted to Foreign Currency as per OB08 rate on PO Creation Date X OB08 rate on PO Date
3. CHA - Company Code Currency Converted to Foreign Currency as per OB08 rate on PO Creation Date X OB08 rate on PO Date
4. Customs - Actual Customs Duty paid in Company Code Currency through Customs MIRO

Hi
i am still waiting for someone to put a comment on this thread
regard
Nabil

Exemptions

Dear sir,
Leave Encashment: tax exemption to be given if the employee declares. As per income tax upto 3,00,000/- payment of leave encashment is exempted from tax
We will be entering the leave encashment payment through info type 15 and tax exemption for the same amount to be entered as exemption under info type 582
Normally we will be paying leave encashment at the time of final settlement after termination of employeee.
in the schema the function which will do this operation is INLEA.
But in my case this function itself its not triggering.
I gave first parameter to this function is:9016(custom wage type which is copied from MLIN(AVERAGE MONTHLY SAL) model wage type)
This 9016 we are maintaing thro infotype 15 and exemption amount we are giving from the infotype 582.
and we ahev mainatined T7INT7 AND T7INT9 tables.
But Problem is in the payroll log this exemption itself its not reflecting at all?
This function itself its nt triggering?
Please explain me to reslove this issue

Hi Raam Manohar,
I have maintained tax slab code as SLEA in the table T7INT7
and i maintained exemption amount in T7INT9
But Problem is in the payroll log this exemption itself its not reflecting at all?
This INLEA(function to calculate the leave encashment exemption) function itself its nt triggering?
we are giving input 9801(Avg sal pre-instln)(custom wage type copied from MLIN (Avg sal pre-instln) model wage type )
This function itself its not triggering?
Please explain me to reslove this issue

How to exempt state tax?

Hi SAP gurus, sorry I created a new thread for this issue. I couldn't find an OSS note for this problem.
Right now we use the tax exempt indicator in IT0210 "R". Our employees' supplemental payment are exempt from AZ state tax. This setting was working for us last year but now it doesn't work. We have to set up the alternate tax fornula to exempt the state tax for supplement payment.
Does anyone have more details about this issue? Why the tax exempt indicator "R" won't work any more?
Thank you in advance.

Thank you Amit. We have the Start and To fields filled for IT0210. The system warns Exemption checkbox selected, end date should be changed to 12/31/2008. I did as it says but it still doesn't work.
OSS note 672148 is talking about the combination of exemption amount, allowance and the exempt indicator. No matter if I use the allowance and exemption amount or not, the AZ state tax is took as 10% of Fed tax.
The only way I found now is to use the Alternative formula as 0% which we don't have to use before. My guess is BSI is now using a fixed percentage of AZ state tax to Fed tax so the tax exempt indicator is not valid for AZ. But the alternative formula is optional for AZ.
That's my understanding of this process. Let me know if you have any details of this issue.
Thanks,
Johnson

Where to find 'Exempt' indicator for reporting using ad-hoc query?

I want to run report for a count of exempt and non-exempt employees using ad-hoc query with logical database PNPCE. We maintain the exempt/non-exempt flag on the job.
Thanks
Manish

To meet this exact same requirement at my company. I added an additional table (T5U13) into the logical database. Within transaction SQ02, go to the field group Organizational Assignment, right-click on the field group. Click Node Extras. Click Create icon over on the right-hand side of the screen. Type in the table name T5U13. Use this select statement:
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T5U13
WHERE STELL                = P0001-STELL
    AND ENDDA                = P0001-ENDDA
Then add the fields into your field groups. I also created a local field so I get the word "Exempt" or "Non-Exempt" in my queries instead of "1" or "2" because i can never remember which is which.
Hope this helps!

Oracle tax reports to show exempt non exempt for states

Hello
is there any standard oracle report to show taxability of states in USA and Canada (exempt/non exempt status)
If so please give the report name and please advise on the name of the responsibility to use to run the report.
thanks
kp

Hello
is there any standard oracle report to show taxability of states in USA and Canada (exempt/non exempt status)
If so please give the report name and please advise on the name of the responsibility to use to run the report.
thanks
kp

US Position Attributes - T5U29 table and Tcode to maintain it

Can anybody tell me what is the importance of T5U29 table and the tcode to maintain it?

Hi Sheetal,
You can maintain this table via SM30 view V_T5U29 and its used for assigning:
Job Category (This field holds the code which corresponds to a particular job category. (Jobs are associated to job categories using a feature.))
AAP Category(This field contains the AAP (Affirmative Action Planning) category to be assigned to a job)
Occupational Classification Code(This field holds the OCC (Occupational Classification Code) which can be assigned to an EEO category.)
Also you can classify you jobs as Exempt or Non Exempt under FLSA guidelines by checking the radio button for Exempt and Non-Exempt.
One more thing in addition to above, generally we maintain attributes fr Job instead of Postion in table T5U13.
Hope this will help
guds
Edited by: guds on May 19, 2009 6:28 PM

Customs & CHA charges

Here my client requirement is they will be entering the total customs and cha charges in the PO conditions
in pricing i have to make one separate account key for CHA charges, for customs it is already available
how to make this account key and assign it to the cha charges in MM pricing???? pls let me know with steps....

Vijay_23 wrote:
Here my client requirement is they will be entering the total customs and cha charges in the PO conditions
>
> in pricing i have to make one separate account key for CHA charges, for customs it is already available
>
> how to make this account key and assign it to the cha charges in MM pricing???? pls let me know with steps....
Hi,
Copy the acc key (FR) and assign it for the CHA cond type in the pricing procedure. In OBYC assign the G/L acc to map to the required account.
Shiva

CEA AND CHA EXEMPTION

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for