CF Standard and 64-bit OS

Hi
I posted this in the CFML - General Discussion area but I'm
not sure if it was the right place to put it, so I've posted it
here too.
We have a memory intensive application which runs on CF
Standard. We are considering moving to 64-bit but CF 8 Standard
only runs as a 32-bit application on a 64-bit OS (
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb403277#_Toc193176416).
I think the acknowledged maximum memory CF can address on 32-bit OS
is 1.8GB. If Standard still only runs as a 32-bit app does that
mean that it still has the memory restrictions?
To expand on this, are there any other pros and cons of
running Standard on 64-bit OS?
Thanks
Nathan

Yes, a 32 bit application is still going to have a memory
constrant. You'll want to upgrade to ColdFusion 64 bit (don't know
if it comes in the Standard flavor) and a 64 bit JVM.

Similar Messages

INdesign and 64 Bit Operating Systems

Been having problems with my INdesign, and the tech people on the support line said it is because I have Vista 64 bit operating system. This sounds very strange to me, as INdesign is the industry standard, and 64 bit operating systems are the norm. Does any one else have experience trying to run INdesign on a 64 bit system?

Bob's right; I'd suggest ignoring the 64-bit issue and just getting familiar with coming to the forums for assistance. I've worked phone tech-support jobs before; phone support reps are judged by how fast they can get you off the phone, and if you start the call with "Hey, I'm running ID on a 64-bit system" then they can get you off the phone immediately, so you just gave their call-time metrics an easy statistical boost.
1) So, yeah, the baseline grid will cause stuff to snap to it if you have that setting turned on in the "Grids & Guides" section of the View menu.
2) "Manual overrides" means that you can format text manually by clicking on the Font menu, and that will cause your formatting to diverge from what is defined in the style. Take a look at the style name; does it have a little plus next to it? That means that the text you've selected diverges from the style. Clear the overrides to return the text to the settings in the paragraph style. You can do this with an alt-click on the style name, or by clicking on the options pulldown in the Paragraph Styles panel and choosing "Clear Overrides." I do it so often that I have a keyboard shortcut set up to do it (in Edit -> Keyboard Shortcuts).

Adobe Reader, X Standard and X Pro 64 bits version

Hi,
I would like to ask a quick question. Do we have 64 bits version for Adobe Acrobat Reader, X Standard and X Pro?
Thanks,

Quick answer: Not for MS Windows.

Problem on installation of windows 2003 Standard Ed. 64 bit with 10 GB RAM

Hi,
I'm trying to install the Oracle 10G R2 on Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition 64 bit on HP machine 64 bit.
My problem is that the Oracle is seeing just 4GB of RAM.
I found some Oracle notes that explain this problem for machine and OS with 32 bit.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Sergio

Are you installing Oracle 32-bit?
(In that case, the process virtual memory addressing is limited to 2^32 = 4GB. Note also it is virtual, not physical memory)
64-bit editions (e.g. for X64) are available from:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/index.html
Message was edited by:
orafad

How can I add features to Windows 7 Standard Embedded 64-bit?

Hey guys,
I apologize if I am posting in the incorrect place but the embedded forum was specifically for POS Systems it seems.
My problem is that a third party has provided us with some systems that include Windows 7 Standard SP1 (64-bit) for their operating systems. Obviously the OS is cut down and missing a bunch of features (as an embedded OS should be); I need to add some of
the Windows 7 features back in. I know how to do this with DISM but can't find any 64-bit features to install as the Standard 7 Embedded Toolkit seems to be 32-bit only?
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
For how to add packages into Windows standard Embedded 7 64 bit, I suggest we ask in the following forum:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=quebeceefs
The reason why we redirect is that you will get more professional response in the proper place.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Best practice for managing a Windows 7 deployment with both 32-bit and 64-bit?

What is the best practice for creating and organizing deployment shares in MDT for a Windows 7 deployment that has mostly 32-bit computers, but a few 64-bit computers as well? Is it better to create a single deployment share for Windows 7 and include both
versions, or is it better to create two separate deployment shares? And what about 32-bit and 64-bit versions of applications?
I'm currently leaning towards creating two separate deployment shares, just so that I don't have to keep typing (x86) and (x64) for every application I import, as well as making it easier when choosing applications in the Lite Touch installation. But I know
each deployment share has the option to create both an x86 and x64 boot image, so that's why I am confused.

Supporting two task sequences is way easier than supporting two shares. Two shares means two boot media, or maintaining a method of directing the user to one or the other. Everything needs to be imported or configured twice. Not to mention doubling storage
space. MDT is designed to have multiple task sequences, why wouldn't you use them?
Supporting multiple task sequences can be a pain, but not bad once you get a system. Supporting app installs intelligently is a large part of that. We have one folder per app install, with a wrapper vbscript that handles OS detection. If there are separate
binaries, they are placed in x86 and x64 subfolders. Everything runs from one folder via the same command, "cscript install.vbs". So, import once, assign once, and forget it. Its the same install package we use for Altiris, and we'll be using a Powershell
version of it when we fully migrate to SCCM.
Others handle x86 and x64 apps separately, and use the MDT app details to select what platform the app is meant for. I've done that, but we have a template for the vbscript wrapper and its a standard process, I believe its easier. YMMV.
Once you get your apps into MDT, create bundles. Core build bundle, core deploy bundle, Laptop deploy bundle, etcetera. Now you don't have to assign twenty apps to both task sequences, just one bundle. When you replace one app in the bundle, all TS'es are
updated automatically. Its kind of the same mentality as active directory. Users, groups and resources = apps, bundles and task sequences.
If you have separate build and deploy shares in your lab, great. If not, separate your apps into build and deploy folders in your lab MDT share. Use a selection profile to upload only your deploy side to production. In fact I separate everything (except
drivers) into Build and deploy folders on my lab server. Don't mix build and deploy, and don't mix Lab/QA and production. I also keep a "Retired" folder. When I replace an app, TS, OS, etcetera, I move it to the retired folder and append "RETIRED - " to the
front of it so I can instantly spot it if it happens to show up somewhere it shouldn't.
To me, the biggest "weakness" of MDT is its flexibility. There's literally a dozen different ways to do everything, and there's no fences to keep you on the path. If you don't create some sort of organization for yourself, its very easy to get lost as things
get complicated. Tossing everything into one giant bucket will have you pulling your hair out.

I am retired. In my active years, I purchased Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Standard and Dreamweaver CS5 for my Windows environment. I recently spent a fortune to migrate to Apple. I realize that my licenses are not recognized by Adobe. I am desperate

I am retired. In my active years, I purchased Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Standard and Dreamweaver CS5 for my Windows environment. I recently spent a fortune to migrate to Apple. I now (and a bite late) realize that my licenses are not recognized by Adobe. I am desperate. I cannot afford the expense of buying or paying access to the software and, still, I need the tools for all those little things I do for enjoyment. What can be done?

The licenses are operating system specific, so one option would be to retain use of the Windows machine you had before the Mac.
If you want to try to use the older stuff on your new Mac you can try installing Windows emulation software such as Bootcamp.

Standard and Pro versions compatible with Windows 7

Hello
I am looking for a list of Adobe Acrobat Standard and Adobe Acrobat Pro that are compatible with Windows 7. We are upgrading over 1000 computers to Windows 7 and we have many different versions of Adobe Acrobat writer Stndard and Pro.
Thanks

There are also issues with 32 vs 64-bit systems. The latter requires updating your version in general. Generally the initial releases have not worked in the 54-bit environment. There are many driver issues with 64-bit systems and probably should look carefully if 64-bits are needed. The 64-bit system is useful if you are computationally focused, but may not be much of an advantage in standard office environments. Just be careful. If you are installing OFFICE 2010, then you need AAX for PDF Maker compatibility -- prior versions of Acrobat only allow printing from the OFFICE 2010 suite. Some folks have been successful with AA8 on 32-bit Win7 (I have only seen 1 post that would suggest success with 64-bit Win7). Prior versions of Acrobat can be made to work on 32-bit Win7 systems, but require work arounds (i.e., the AcroTray tool that automates the conversion to PDF process fails in Win7). The 64-bit system will probably fail for most of the earlier versions in such cases.
Realize that you may have to deal with Win8 shortly that has it's own issues.

Disabling Right Click Menus for Network Magic's System Tray Icons for Standard and Guest Accounts

OK, so I want to know how to disable the right click menus for Network Magic's system tray icons only for Vista's standard and Guest accounts? I don't want other users signed in as a Standard account or guest account having the ability to disable the system tray icons for network magic.

Hi, currently it's not possible to disable NM from being accessed by a Limited user account, but that is a good idea.
My Cisco Network Magic Configuration:
Router: D-Link WBR-2310 A1 FW:1.04, connected to Comcast High Speed Internet
Desktop, iMac: NM is on the Windows Partition, using Boot camp to access Windows, Windows 7 Pro 32-bit RTM, Broadcom Wireless N Card, McAfee Personal Firewall 2009,
Mac Partition of the iMac is using Mac OS X 10.6.1 Snow Leopard
Laptop: Windows XP Pro SP3, Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG, McAfee Personal Firewall 2008
Please note that though I am a beta tester for Network Magic, I am not a employee of Linksys/Cisco and am volunteering my time here to help other NM users.

Design Standard, and Design Premium, Design Web, and Web Premium don't show up as applications we can package in Creative Cloud Packager. What app replaces these in CC?

Using our Enterprise License key Design Standard, and Design Premium, Design Web, and Web Premium don't show up as applications we can package in Creative Cloud Packager. What apps replaces these in CC?

If your machine does not meet the tech specs for an application, the application will not be listed/offered in the manager. In this case Premiere Pro CC is a 64-bit application and your machine is 32-bit.

Do I load both 32 bit and 64 bit version on a windows 8pro pc?

I'm loading a new version of CS6 standard and I'm at the screen where it asks what programs to load. In the case where the 64 bit program is available, do I load just this version. Or, should I load both the 32 bit and the 64 bit versions?

Hi jeri-de,
If you are using a 64 bit computer you can install just the 64 bit program else install only the 32 bit version.

Creation of Add-on package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One Client

Please help me creating package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One. If Add-on executable is compiled with x86 option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 32 bit SAP Business one and if Add-on executable is compiled with Any CPU option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 64 bit SAP Business one. Problems are mentioned as below
1. My Add-on uses MS ACCESS connection and the connection is read using Jet OLEDB 4.0 provider. It works fine for x86 compile mode but not when compile mode is Any CPU. I searched for the issue on Google and found a solution to change MS ACCESS connection provider to ACE.OLEDB.12.0 but again ACE provider is installed according to the Office version i.e. 32 bit or 64 bit office suite. If I install 32 bit ACE provider then Add-on executable compiled with x86 version is working fine but with Any CPU option throws error as provider is not registered on current machine.
2. Secodly, our license validation activex dll is build using vb 6.0 and therefore when Add-on executable is compiled using Any CPU option, Add-on EXE cannot read from license dll. Any suggestion, how the activeX dll can be compiled whose component can be created from for X86 compiled exe and any cpu compiled exe.
Please help because we are stuck in this issue and cannot move forward.
Thanks.

Hi Alejandro,
That is one solution but did your add on used ms access connection? if you used Jet oledb to connection string or ace oledb connection string? what if 32 bit office is installed and what if 64 office is installed? how did you found the office version in install script? after determining the office version how did you installed Microsoft redistributable for ace oledb (32 bit or 64 bi )?
I am sorry that I asked many questions but these are the problems where I am stuck with the addon installer?
Thanks

What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management

What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management
Thanks
Shashikala

This is the basic difference...check if helps:
A 32-bit CPU running 32-bit software (also known as the x86 platform) is so named because it is based on an architecture that can manipulate values that are up to 32 bits in length. This means that a 32-bit memory pointer can store a value between 0 and
4,294,967,295 to reference a memory address. This equates to a maximum addressable space of 4GB on 32-bit platforms
On the other hand 64-bit limit of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616, this number is so large that in memory/storage terminology it equates to 16 exabytes. You don’t come across that term very often, so to help understand the scale, here is the value converted to
more commonly used measurements: 16 exabytes = 16,777,216 petabytes (16 million PB)➤ 17,179,869,184 terabytes (17 billion TB)➤ 17,592,186,044,416 gigabytes (17 trillion GB)➤
As you can see, it is signiﬁcantly larger than the 4GB virtual address space usable in 32-bit systems; it’s so large in fact that any hardware capable of using it all is sadly restricted to the realm of science ﬁction. Because of this, processor manufacturers
decided to only implement a 44-bit address bus, which provides a virtual address space on 64-bit systems of 16TB. This was regarded as being more than enough address space for the foreseeable future and logically it’s split into an 8TB range for user mode
and 8TB for kernel mode. Each 64-bit process running on an x64 platform will be able to address up to 8TB of VAS.
Please click the Mark as answer button and vote as helpful if this reply solves your problem

Standard and customized reports

Experts,
I'm given a requirement to create some reports. Was hoping someone can help me with which are standard and customized reports from this list :
OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT
OPEN REQUISITION REPORT
OPEN RFQ REPORT
PURCHASE ORDER CONFIRMATION REPORT
STOCK ITEMS RE-ORDER
STOCK ITEMS RESERVED
STOCK ITEMS ABOVE STOCK MAX
STOCK ITEMS BELOW STOCK MIN
STOCK ITEMS DETAILS
STOCK ITEMS INVENTORY CONTROL
STOCK ITEMS LIST BY NUMBER
STOCK ITEMS MOST USED
STOCK ITEMS NOT USED
STOCK ITEMS ORDER BY COST
STOCK ITEMS ORDER BY LOCATION
STOCK ITEMS ORDER BY VENDOR
STOCK ITEMS OVER RESERVED
STOCK ITEMS STATUS
STOCK ITEMS VALUE
VENDOR PERFORMANCE REPORT
Regards,

Hi,
SAP Std. Reports     Description                                                                          Z-Dev
ME2N / ME2M / ME2L     OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT
ME5A                          OPEN REQUISITION REPORT
ME4N / ME4M / ME4L     OPEN RFQ REPORT
ME2A / VL06I     PURCHASE ORDER CONFIRMATION REPORT
MB53                          STOCK ITEMS RE-ORDER                                                     ABAP Report
MB24 / MB25                          STOCK ITEMS RESERVED
                          STOCK ITEMS ABOVE STOCK MAX                                ABAP Report
                          STOCK ITEMS BELOW STOCK MIN                                ABAP Report
MMBE / MB52     STOCK ITEMS DETAILS
MC.1 / MC.9                           STOCK ITEMS INVENTORY CONTROL
MMBE / MB52     STOCK ITEMS LIST BY NUMBER
MC46                           STOCK ITEMS MOST USED
MC50                           STOCK ITEMS NOT USED
ME2N / ME2M / ME2L     STOCK ITEMS ORDER BY COST
ME2N / ME2M / ME2L     STOCK ITEMS ORDER BY LOCATION
ME2L                          STOCK ITEMS ORDER BY VENDOR
MB24/MB25                           STOCK ITEMS OVER RESERVED                                        ABAP Report
MMBE/MB53                           STOCK ITEMS STATUS
MB52                           STOCK ITEMS VALUE
ME6H                           VENDOR PERFORMANCE REPORT

Firefox 18.0.1 consuming excessive CPU--both in Standard and Safe Mode--when accessing Gmail

Firefox 18.0.1 consumes excessive CPU--both in Standard and Safe Modes--when accessing Gmail (in Standard Mode). CPU consumption averages around 56% on my dual-CPU, Windows 7 desktop.
The only way to stop this from happening it to open Gmail in "HTML" mode. When I open Gmail in Standard mode, a "Loading..." status shows at the top of the page. After about 30 seconds, a error window pops-up within the Gmail page saying that there is a performance problem and provides the option to load Gmail in a limited, "HTML" mode. Clicking the HTML Mode link solves the issue. I've been using Firefox for years and have never seen this issue until now.

try this link
*https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-many-cpu-resources-how-fix

CF Standard and 64-bit OS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for