Change Quality of Service Message

Hello,
I've a interface IDOC - JDBC. The quality of Service is EOIO.
II want to change this quality to EO
How can i do it? Where?
thank very much,

I think you receiver determination have multiple messages (i.e branching of the messages in interface determination) as a result quality of service changed to EOIO..
In order to make EO for the same remove the check box option Maintain order at runtime in interface determination for the same and try
HTH
Rajesh

Similar Messages

Change "Quality of Service" EOIO to EO for a XI Purache Interface in EBP

Hello Colleagues,
we have a PO interface in place but some problems with Message processing at Adapter. To solve the problem we try to change the Quality of Server EOIO to EO but the Quality of Service comes from the EBP system at XML Message header.
Please, in that location on the EBP system are we able to change the Quality of Service?
Many thanks in advance!
Jochen

Hi Barry,
The EBP system send POs (also calalog messages) via integration engine (SXMB_MONI on EBP) to the XI system (Integration Server) and the XI system sends the messages out to the Vendor via SOAP.
The messages which are send by EBP are with QOS EOIO at message header.
Regards,
Jochen

Changing Quality of Service in Receiver Adapter

Hi,
We have a scenario where hundreds of messages for the same interface is sent to XI and written to one file on the receiver side. We do not want to change the QOS (Quality of Service) to EOIO (Exactly Once in Order) on the sender side nor do we want to use BPM due to performance issues.
Is there any way to change the QOS to EOIO after the mapping is complete?
I tried changing the QOS (DeliverySemantics) using a adapter module on the receiver adapter. In the audit log, I can see that the QOS has been changed to EOIO and assigned to the correct ConversationId, but the messages does not follow the EOIO process.
Any help is great appreciated.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Duke

Here is more detail on the scenario.
Hundreds of messages come into XI from R/3. One message is split into multiple messages by using the Extended Interface Determination. These messages are written to a file (each message has its own file). The file adapter is set to append.
The issue we are facing is that when hundreds of messages are processed simultaneously, it triggers an error when attempting to write to the file (locking issues). It then has to wait and retry, which adds to total processing time. Due to the time sensitivity of these interfaces and the errors that are raised, we would like to change the QOS to EOIO on the receiver side (when it writes to the file) so that it does not have to wait and retry.
The Maintain Order at Runtime is checked in the Interface Determination. Once it gets to the adapter framework to write to the file, it has a QOS of Exactly Once, which is carried over from the sender.
We do not want to change the QOS on the sender side, but only on the receiver side.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Duke
Edited by: Duke on May 29, 2008 5:11 PM

RFC TO SOAP - Quality of Service

Hi,
i see that my RFC to SOAP test functioning properly. But in Exactly Once mode. In RFC Sender adapter and SOAP Receiver adapter there is no configuration tab to change "Quality of service".
Is it possible to change the mode?
Kind Regards,
PM

It is not possible to set the QoS at Channel leve for RFC receiver.
Have a look at this thread: tRFC & qRFC
for SOAP, look at this discussion: Re: In what QOS does the receiver SOAP adapter work BE or EO?
Regards
Ramesh
Edited by: Ramesh P on Dec 30, 2011 1:17 PM

How to get informed by email about changes on service messages of the servi

How to get informed by email about changes on service messages of the service desk.
I need a kind of overview
functional details
and a very good guideline to do the implementation
Does anyone know how to do it?

Hi,
Go throw this
Note 691303, Note 1041455
you will find each and every thing abt implementation .
Send mail to Message Processor in Service Desk
Points if helpfull
Regards,
Neni

Change Queue name in Message mapping

Hi
We want to change the queue name dynamically in the message mapping.
We refered the post
Re: EOIO queue name change
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6e/ff0bf75772457b863ef5d99bc92404/frameset.htm
But as said in it, we are not able to access the parameter QUEUE_ID or QUALITY_OF_SERVICE.
Other than these two parameters, we can access all parameters.
Below is the code to access one of them.
while compiling, the message mapping gives error as below.
cannot find symbol
symbol : variable QUEUE_ID
Any pointers.
///// CODE
MappingTrace trace;
String constant;
java.util.Map map;
trace = container.getTrace();
// get constant map
map = container.getTransformationParameters();
constant = (String) map.get(
StreamTransformationConstants.QUEUE_ID);
trace.addInfo("QUEUE ID:" + constant);
return constant;
Regards
Anandan

Hi Anandan,
As given in help you can only get queue Id if you have Quality of service as ExactlyOnceInOrder. So make sure you have selected that option.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6e/ff0bf75772457b863ef5d99bc92404/content.htm
Regards,
---Satish

Setting Up Router Quality of Service

I need to set limits to specific IP's or devices in my house using the internet. I heard that "Quality of Service" on the router was the best way to go. I checked it out on my router but it is very confusing. I have no idea how to set this up and I work with computers for a living. Can anyone help me configure this?

Hi SadGamerGeek,
Welcome to the community and thanks for posting!
Sorry for the problems you're having with your broadband speed and for the time it's taking to sort out. I can help you from here. Click on my username and under the section "about me" you'll see the link to "contact the mods".
Whenever we've received your details we'll take it from there.
Thanks a million,
Robbie
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Quality of service in Receiver file/ftp adapter (SAP PI 7.1)?

Hi,
    We are building an IDoc to File scenario in SAP PI 7.1, where a single incoming idoc will create three different output files. Also files must be created in target server in a specific order.
    Our first idea to ensure that files would be created following a specific order was that Message mapping (in Java) build target payload with all three files following expected sequence.
    In addition, receiver file/ftp adapter is setup with a dynamic variable to create each file with a different filename adding also timestamp.
    Testing the scenario, we see that three files are created in target server but when we sort them by creation date, it seems they don't follow always same sequence.
    Sometimes adapter creates File1, File2, File3; next time it created File2, File1, File3 and so on.
    Our problem is that files must be created always with a specific order and we cannot use BPM. Does anyone know if a receiver file/ftp adapter can be setup to create files following specific sequence (EOIO)?
    I know that sender file/ftp adapter can be setup with a quality of service, but I didn't find anything similar for Receiver file/ftp adapter.
    Suggestions will be welcome.
Kind Regards,
Aitor

Hi,
     First, thanks all of you for your quick answers. They were helpful because we learnt a new configuration setting.
     We tried your suggestions but they didn't really fix our problem.
     Finally interface has been re-designed and we will not have to apply this logic, so no issue from our side.
     However, let me continue with this topic in case that somebody else will have the same issue, then it will be able to review this thread.
     When adapter created the files in the target directory (windows server), files had the expected timestamp in each filename. However, if we sorted windows directory contents by "Date Creation", files were sorted different that timestamp shows in the filename.
     For example, adapter created following files:
File1_20090325-115117-169
File2_20090325-115117-174
File3_20090325-115117-180
     But when we sorted windows folder contents, files were sorted as follows:
File2_20090325-115117-174
File1_20090325-115117-169
File3_20090325-115117-180
     It seems that timestamp was pre-assigned by the adapter, but when adapter created the files, it did it with a temporary name and finally assigns the filename. If a file size was bigger than other, maybe it takes more time and windows creation date is higher.
     If so, it means that adapter is not following same instructions as itu2019s indicated in "maintain order at runtime" checkbox.
     Do you know if there is any way where we can push also the order in the adapter as we did in interface determination?
Regards,
Aitor

How does the quality of service in India compare to the United States?

I am currently in India and 12 hours from the closest Apple service center in Delhi. After the monsoon rains started my computer started acting up. At first some keys seemed to stick and I was able to solve the problem by attaching a USB keyboard. Lately the computer started crashing and then having trouble starting up again (an internet search suggests this could be a problem with the RAM). If I left the computer for a while it would start up and operate well for a bit but eventually crash again.
I took the computer into a computer repair shop here and he said that I should wait (3 months) until I go back to the United States rather than go through the trouble of traveling to Delhi to get the computer repaired. He also said that the quality of repairs is much better in the US. For example, in India they will put in second hard refurbished hardware whereas in the US they will use new hardware. The repairs in India will also take much longer than it would in the US. He recommended I get a cheap PC from him to use while I am here and get my mac repaired when i get back to the United States, he would then buy the computer back when I left.
I was wondering if anybody could share their experience or knowledge of the quality of service in India. Thank you.

And another quote from the fine manual:
Re Slideshow:
Rendering Preview Images
Aperture renders preview images in four situations:
When a library is upgraded—provided that the “Create previews for existing images” checkbox is selected in the Welcome to Aperture dialog
When an image is imported, or a version is created, rotated, or adjusted—provided that the Maintain Previews item is selected in the Library Action pop-up menu (with a gear icon)
When you Control-click the library, a project, or an image selection and choose Update Previews from the shortcut menu
Immediately before a slideshow, if the previews are not up to date, and the slideshow preset uses the Best quality setting
When rendering a group of preview images, Aperture uses the current application preference settings for compression quality and picture size, not the settings that were specified when preview rendering began. For example, if you have the quality set to 6, and then halfway through rendering you change the setting to 8, the previews that have not yet been rendered will be compressed at setting 8. Previously rendered previews are unaffected.
So, a high quality slideshow will require high quality previews, and indeed Aperture will render previews before rendering a slideshow, if the preview quality is not sufficient.
Regards
Léonie

Quality of Services "Exactly Once in Order"

Hi,
I have several integration using iDOC output R / 3.
This integration into the Integration Builder them removed brand "Maintain Order At runtime" (Quality of Services - Interface Determination) to be executed in parallel, but when they reach the engine J2EE appear with the Quality of Services as "Exactly Once in Order."
Why this happens with iDOCs? . With RFC do not have this problem.
Best Regards
Julian.

Hi
I have been reviewing the integrations that run in parallel and gave the impression that really do not run in parallel (Quality of Services "Exactly Once"), but that the channel receiver is taken so that the previous interface ends of inserting data into the receiver.
If open the message and revise the log, the first message that arrives is in this state:
"JDBC adapter receiver channel JDBC_XXX_YYY_Receiver: started processing; Party, service ZZZ_BS "
But the following is not enough to reach this state and it is with this log:
"Receiver JDBC adapter: started processing; QoS required: ExactlyOnce "
One step before the first message, only runs the next step when the first message ends to be processed by the adapter.

Quality of service (QOS) is disabled in the HTTP service. Unable to tur...

Hi,
"Quality of service (QOS) is disabled in the HTTP service. Unable to turn on QOS features." this message is seen and server restart itself. Why this occur?
Thanks..

That message is logged when you have QOS disabled. Check http://docs.sun.com/source/817-1831-10/agsnmp.html#wp999778 for information on enabling QOS.
However, the server should not crash/restart. Please describe the steps to reproduce the problem.
Message was edited by:
Arvind_Srinivasan

SAP PI: the quality of service EO vs. EOIO

Hello all,
I have a service (File -> XI -> RFC). If i use the quality of service "EOIO" in the file sender channel, the data from xml file could not be imported in backend system per RFC-call. If i use "EO"-Settings then the data could be saved in backend system without problem. Could someone tell, what is that problem? thx.
Best regards,
Fanglin

Hello Harisch,
i have read the discussion und tried to delete the messages using the following methods. It didn't work:
1. the report "RSXMB_CANCEL_MESSAGES": the message with Message-ID could not be found
2. the SMQ1, SMQ2 und SMQ3: the EOIO-Queue could not be listed.
In RWB there no options to cancel (or delete) the messages. I can only restart the first message:
Best regards,
Fanglin

Quality Of Service (BE,EOIO)...FIFO

Hi,
SAP XI has the concept of Quality of Service wherein they have BE, EOIO,EO.
Please can anyone tell me is this associated to a queue or a message. Also, if asociated to a Queue, where in SAO can we do this setting of making a Queue BE or EOIO.
And how do we associate a message to a particular queue?
Do we have the concept of FIFO..is this realted to Quality of service??
Please can anyone clear my doubt.
Thanks

Bhavesh,
I don't see any options available in RFC Sender adapter and in HTTP Receiver adapter to select the quality of service.
Do you know how to select that option? I know that once I select that option I need to mention a queue name.
We are at XI 3.0 SP14.
Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks
Kalyan

Need some clarifications on Quality-of-services

Hi Everybody.
I need some clarification on Quality-of-services.the question is which one is better in Quality-of-services (Exactly-Once or Exactly-Once-In-order)?why?wht is the differenc between them?

Hi Narayana
refer the below Urls
make the QOS of file as EO or EOIO and then use this blog,
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
It depends upon the Adapter,Can you please spicific
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/content.htm
Check these blogs written on QoS:
XI Asynchronous Message Processing: Understanding XI Queues
How to deal with stuck EOIO messages in the XI 3.0 Adapter Framework
EO = Exactly Once ( Used in Asynchronous Communication)
EOIO = Exactly Once In Order ( Used in Asynchronous Communication)
BE = Best Effort ( Used in Synchronous Communication)
Best Effort --> Used for Synchronous Calls.
EO and EOIO --> Asynchronous Calls.
EOIO --> Asynchronous with Sequential Processing Guranteed.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm
For the QOS, u can refer the following library links .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
For receiver channels QoS BE (Best Effort) will result in a
synchronous call (sRFC) , QoS EO (Exactly Once) will create a
transactional call (tRFC) to the BC. For sender channels a synchronous
call (sRFC) will result in a message with QoS BE, a transactional call
(tRFC) will result in a message with QoS EO.
QoS EOIO is not supported by the BC-Adapter.
SAP XI term Quality of service describing how the transmission and process-ing of messages is to be handled. Possible values are:
BE = BestEffort (synchronous call, no transactional guarantees for transmission and processing)
EO = ExactlyOnce (asynchronous call, guarantee for local transactional handling, exactly-once transmission and exactly-once processing)
EOIO = ExactlyOnceInOrder (as for EO but with serialization guarantee on a given queue name).
<b>Pls reward if useful</b>

Font sizes for message change when mailbox or message list is changed

When changing the preferences for message font to something a bit more readable (ie, 14 pt), that doesn't seem to actually affect the message font size except on the message I am actually looking at at that instant. It always reverts back to size of the message list font!
How do I get the message list to be smaller (ie 10 pt) and the message font to be bigger (ie 14 pt)? Changing the prefs doen't seem to do it.
1.33 ghz 15 Alum G4 PB, 350 mhz G3 iMac, 2 ghz Dual G5 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Thank you very much for sharing that information. It is great to hear verification that the mask assignment change did resolve your problem. That is the latest resolution that TAC has recommended, but we have to restart the WCCP service on all redundant edge routers to be able to implement this, so planning the outage window is taking some time. We've been told that TAC will set this up in a lab and test for us by our Cisco SE. We're hoping to get verfication that this actually resolves the problem before we take the outage.
If you could, can you tell me if this resolved the issue 100% or do you still have any performance issues when making a change to your WCCP ACL going to your bluecoat equipment? We may also need to implement this in our redirects to BlueCoat from our Nexus. Do you happen to have a link to how to make this change in Bluecoat? Thanks again!

Change Quality of Service Message

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for