Cico vpn and microsoft vpn
i am currently using cisco vpn client, after connecting i want to reconnect another vpn to microsoft, while connecting it displays error 800, after getting these detail it shows that your cisco router firmware is old ( older than 2000) i am using cisco 1811 ios 12.3.9.
other detail of vpn 800 error "tcp window size is 0"
any help regarding this, thanks in advance
Hi,
We require more info in order to understand clearly whats going on. Could you please paste the screen shot of the err message.
Regards,
wilson samuel
Similar Messages
-
Performance end to end testing and comparison between MPLS VPN and VPLS VPN
Hi,
I am student of MSc Network Security and as for my project which is " Comparison between MPLS L3 VPN and VPLS VPN, performance monitoring by end to end testing " I have heard a lot of buzz about VPLS as becoming NGN, I wanted to exppore that and produce a comparison report of which technology is better. To accomplish this I am using GNS3, with respect to the MPLS L3 VPN lab setup that is not a problem but I am stuck at the VPLS part how to setup that ? I have searched but unable to find any cost effective mean, even it is not possible in the university lab as we dont have 7600 series
I would appreciate any support, guidence, advice.
Thanks
ShahbazHi Shahbaz,
I am not completely sure I understand your request.
MPLS VPN and VPLS are 2 technologies meant to address to different needs, L3 VPN as opposed as L2 VPN. Not completely sure how you would compare them in terms of performance. Would you compare the performance of a F1 racing car with a Rally racing car?
From the ISP point of view there is little difference (if we don't want to consider the specific inherent peculiarities of each technology) , as in the very basic scenarios we can boil down to the following basic operations for both:
Ingress PE impose 2 labels (at least)
Core Ps swap top most MPLS label
Egress PE removes last label exposing underlying packet or frame.
So whether the LSRs deal with underlying L2 frames or L3 IP packets there is no real difference in terms of performance (actually the P routers don't even notice any difference).
About simulators, I am not aware of anyone able to simulate a L2 VPN (AtoM or VPLS).
Riccardo -
Cisco VPN and Microsoft Virtual PC (xp mode under Windows 7)
I've installed XP under my users Windows 7 64 bit Enterprise. Unfortunately I set up networking for DHCP so that the host and guest (too much vmware :) ) get two different IP's.
So with Cisco anyconnect, I can't get the guest (i.e. the Win xp vm) to connect correctly. I want to change networking back to bridged and try that, but for the life of me I can't find where the settings are. I'm thinking that bridged (where
I don't have to try the Cisco client in the vm might work better)
But I"m in the US
My users in Australia
and right now I can't get remote tools to work on the host and talking this guy through it on the phone is not pleasant.
Are there instructions somewhere, and where is the full downloadable documentation for this product. I can find online, can't find a full downloadable copyOn Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:34:57 +0000, Jim_St wrote:
I've installed XP under my users Windows 7 64 bit Enterprise.=A0=20
Unfortunately I set up networking for DHCP so that the host and guest=20
(too much vmware :) )=A0 get two different IP's.
So with Cisco anyconnect, I can't get the guest (i.e. the Win xp vm) to=20
connect correctly.=A0 I want to change networking back to bridged and =
try=20
that, but for the life of me I can't find where the settings are.=A0 I'm=
=20
thinking that bridged (where I don't have to try the Cisco client in=20
the vm might work better)
But I"m in the US
My users in Australia
and right now I can't get remote tools to work on the host and talking=20
this guy through it on the phone is not pleasant.
Are there instructions somewhere, and where is the full downloadable=20
documentation for this product. I can find online, can't find a full=20
downloadable copy
Bridged networking is what VMWare calls it and it works basically the
same as the way you don't like here. The guest will interact with the
NIC on the host and from the outsie it will present a second channel
with a different MAC address. This channel will acquire an IP address
of its own from the DHCP server.
But no matter what you do, the host and guest will NEVER EVER get the
same IP address!
Additionally, Cisco VPN by design will shut down ALL other network
interfaces when it connects the tunnel so the computer running Cisco
VPN will be effectively disconnected from the local network and
INSTEAD connected to the remote network. You cannot share this VPN
tunnel to another local computer and this includes the host.
Bo Berglund -
Netctl, systemd and 'external' vpn command
I am trying to use netctl to connect to a vpn (a microsoft vpn). The `pon` command works, but I would like to use netctl to set up routing, dns, et cetera. I am confused about how netctl and systemd should work together, and I have not found any documentation where this is explained in a way that I can follow.
What I did gather, is that netctl delegates vpn connections to systemd. This is the contents of /etc/systemd/system/myvpn.service:
[Unit]
Description=myvpn connection
[Service]
Type=forking
ExecStart=/usr/bin/pon
PIDFile=/var/run/ppp0.pid
Unclear to me is how I should set up an additional netctl file, and how that one should make use of, or, being used by, the systemd-file.
Pointers are very much appreciated!Could very well be possible that I've been on the wrong track
But I cannot make the pppoe-configuration to work.
* Where would I put the `pon`-command? I have grepped the files of netctl, but the pon-command is not built in...
* Why would I need to put in username and password? That is already handled by my chaps-secret file, that is pointed to via the OptionsFile...
* And what should I choose for the Interface? If I give it the name ppp0 (what is being used by pon), netctl complains as follows:
Interface 'ppp0' does not exist
Anyway, here is my current config:
$ grep -vE '^(#|$)' /etc/netctl/myvpn
Description='Example PPPoE connection'
Interface=ppp0
Connection=pppoe
User='myuser'
Password='mypassword'
PPUnit=0
OptionsFile=/etc/ppp/peers/myvpn
IP=dhcp
ConnectionMode='persist'
DefaultRoute=false
UsePeerDNS=false
$ cat /etc/ppp/peers/myvpn
pty "pptp <ip-address> --nolaunchpppd"
name myvpn
remotename FW-ROADWAR
require-mppe-128
require-mschap
file /etc/ppp/myvpn.options
ipparam myvpn
$ cat /etc/ppp/myvpn.options
lock
# debug
name vpn
noauth
user myusername
# mppe required,no40,no56
refuse-eap
lcp-echo-failure 30
lcp-echo-interval 20
idle 0
defaultroute
maxfail 1 -
ASA 5505 Site to Site and Web VPN
Hello all, I need to add a site to site tunnel from a an ASA 5505 (ver 8.05) to a Sonic wall appliance. The problem is, the ASA already has remote access VPN and anyconnect VPN configured. I'm not sure if its possible to add another secured tunnel to the device. Ive already got one NAT 0 statement.
Thanks for your expert opinions!Hi,
There should be no problem adding a Site to Site VPN on the ASA even if it has Client VPN configured.
If you for example have an "inside" interface which has NAT0 configuration like
nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT0
You just add the needed ACL lines to that existing ACL for the L2L VPN.
On the basis of the information you provided I dont see any problem configuring the L2L VPN on the ASA.
- Jouni -
L3 vpn and VPLS on same SVI.
Hi,
Can anyone help me with this query?
I am trying to connect a CE router with two redundant links to two seperate PEs. I need spanning tree to be run between the PEs for the resilence and failover so was thinking VPLS, but also need the CE to connect to a L3 vpn.
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a vlan (SVI) in a VPLS instance and a L3 MPLS vpn?
Thanks
Wai-LunHello Wai,
I may be wrong but I don't think you can at the same time over a single SVI to offer L3 VPN and L2 VPN services.
However, I would suggest to divide your links/requirements: the two CE-PE1 and CE-PE2 links will be VRF access links from the PE point of view and you can use a dynamic protocol.
Routing protols can provide all the failover and redundancy you are looking for.
The PE Routers will be interconnected via MPLS backbone links.
If you miss your own backbone infrastructure you can use CSC (Carrier Supporting Carrier) or lease simple EoMPLS /VPLS links from a provider (this may need some thoughts about MTU)
hope to help
best regards
Giuseppe -
Can I connect to my microsoft network via VPN and download network files?
Can I connect to my microsoft network via VPN and download network files to my iPad2? If so, what app is required?
There are several apps available from App Store but the one I use is iTeleport.
Oops the Windows specific version is called Jaadu Remote Desktop for Windows
Message was edited by: Joe Bailey to add Windows version -
VPN: iPAD IPSEC AND MICROSOFT TMG
I have problem with connecting to my ipsec vpn on microsoft TMG.
When i try connect (on ipsec with certificate) from windows xp and win7 to this vpn I dont have any problems.
On My ipad I can only connect on L2tp with preshared key, but on ipsec with certificate still nothing.
I try connecting on two certificates: on the same whot I have on pc, and on new only to ipad. On iphone configuration tool i install all certificates (CA root, CA sub, VPN on TMG, client cert with client authentication). In my cert i have external crl. I try to on certificate with additional SAN-s (VPN server FQDN and IP address)
When I try connect on ipad to tmg ipsec vpn I found that error on logs:
EventId: 4653
An IPsec main mode negotiation failed.
Local Endpoint:
Local Principal Name: -
Network Address: x.x.x.x
Keying Module Port: 500
Remote Endpoint:
Principal Name: -
Network Address: x.x.x.x
Keying Module Port: 500
Additional Information:
Keying Module Name: IKEv1
Authentication Method: Unknown authentication
So maybe any one can help me ? Whot I do wrong ?
Thanks a lot.Hi
The application in Itunes is indeed free however in order to use it you will need to have a special anyconnect mobile licence loaded onto the Cisco ASA. The licence can be ordered through a Cisco registered partner with part code L-ASA-AC-M-55XX= (XX=05,10,20,40,50,80 depending on the model).
Alex -
VPN and Exchange server blocks internet access
i had some difficulty configuring Entourage to connect to an Exchange server after establishing a VPN. When the VPN was up, but the Entourage was not working, I could use Safari or any other web access without problems. After getting the Entourage account running, it was populating the folders for what seemed like hours, so i wanted to do other things while waiting. Safari and AOL would not connect. Apparently Microsoft has figured out another way to mess with you on a Mac. Anyone had this problem?
It turns out that it's the VPN that is blocking web access. The first time I configured it a couple of months ago, it connected, and I could do whatever I wanted. When I tried to use the VPN the other day, all my settings had been erased for some reason and I had to reconfigure. It connected, I got into Entourage, used it, but when I tried to go to a web site Safari wouldn't connect. I closed Entourage, no dice. Today I connected without going into Entourage and Safari wouldn't connect. Without the VPN, Safari behaves itself. I have a PC upstairs with the same VPN and it allows use of your browser.
I connected to a different VPN host and still no browser on the Mac. Can not figure out what has happened. -
I've been trying to get the iPhone VPN to work with a self-signed cert to no avail. I generated the cert using Windows 2008r2 certificate services, exported the server and root and put into the ICU and my Cisco vpn (using ipsec of course).
In the ICU VPN section, under Identifity Certificate, it doesn't seem to recognize that I have the certs loaded. Please see http://imgur.com/KypuN. The server name and certs match where they should, and I know I'm missing something obvious here, but just can't find the problem.
Any help would be appreciated.I was able to find the issue. I have tested the Scenario with a Surface RT 8.1. I enrolled the device to SCCM/Intune and get a certficate with NDES. Then I have added a VPN Connection and try to connect. Windows ask for SmartCard. But
the certficate isn't Smartcard. So I added second VPN Connection to a Microsoft VPN and try to connect with same certificate. No question about Smartcard and the connection is established fine. Than I could remind the Options of certficate profiles (TPM or
Software Key Storage). I' ve selected TPM in my initial configuration. I changed it to Software Key Storage and reenroll to Intune to force certficate deployment. After receiving the new certificate I tried again on my Surface and the Juniper VPN Connection
were established. I reenrolled my Windows Phone to Intune and after I received the new certificate I were able to connect my Windows Phone to Juniper VPN too.
So I think the Problem is that the Juniper 3rd Party api is not allowed to access TPM or it is done the wrong way.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Denis
-
How do i use an active directory group for vpn and not all user
hi all,
i have an asa 5515x...
how do i use a particular group in active directory to have vpn/anyconnect access? right now i believe it's for all user on my current config,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
!integrate with active directory
aaa-server LDAPSERVERS protocol ldap
aaa-server LDAPSERVERS (vlan192) host 10.0.0.2
ldap-base-dn dc=company,dc=com
ldap-scope subtree
ldap-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
ldap-login-password 12345678
ldap-login-dn cn=administrator,cn=Users,dc=company,dc=com
server-type auto-detect
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
say i want this "vpn-group" object group in AD and my vpn is only anyconnect and no other vpn types.
thanks for any comment you may add.The best way is to use Dynamic Access Policies (DAP). Cisco has a white paper (here) that shows how one can choose the LDAP group as one of the DAP criteria.
DAP requires the Advanced Endpoint Assessment feature, so your licensing must support that. -
IpSec VPN and NAT don't work togheter on HP MSR 20 20
Hi People,
I'm getting several issues, let me explain:
I have a Router HP MSR with 2 ethernet interfaces, Eth 0/0 - WAN (186.177.159.98) and Eth 0/1 LAN (192.168.100.0 /24). I have configured a VPN site to site thru the internet, and it works really well. The other site has the subnet 10.10.10.0 and i can reache the network thru the VPN Ipsec. The issue is that the network 192.168.100.0 /24 needs to reach internet with the same public address, so I have set a basic NT configuration, when I put the nat configuration into Eth 0/0 all network 192.168.100.0 can go to internet, but the VPN goes down, when I remove the NAT from Eth 0/0 the VPN goes Up, but the network 192.168.100.0 Can't go to internet.
I'm missing something but i don't know what it is !!!!, See below the configuration.
Can anyone help me qith that, I need to send te traffic with target 10.10.10.0 thru the VPN, and all other traffic to internet, Basically I need that NAT and VPN work fine at same time.
Note: I just have only One public Ip address.
version 5.20, Release 2207P41, Standard
sysname HP
nat address-group 1 186.177.159.93 186.177.159.93
domain default enable system
dns proxy enable
telnet server enable
dar p2p signature-file cfa0:/p2p_default.mtd
port-security enable
acl number 2001
rule 0 permit source 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
rule 5 deny
acl number 3000
rule 0 permit ip source 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
vlan 1
domain system
access-limit disable
state active
idle-cut disable
self-service-url disable
ike proposal 1
encryption-algorithm 3des-cbc
dh group2
ike proposal 10
encryption-algorithm 3des-cbc
dh group2
ike peer vpn-test
proposal 1
pre-shared-key cipher wrWR2LZofLx6g26QyYjqBQ==
remote-address <Public Ip from VPN Peer>
local-address 186.177.159.93
nat traversal
ipsec proposal vpn-test
esp authentication-algorithm sha1
esp encryption-algorithm 3des
ipsec policy vpntest 30 isakmp
connection-name vpntest.30
security acl 3000
pfs dh-group2
ike-peer vpn-test
proposal vpn-test
dhcp server ip-pool vlan1 extended
network mask 255.255.255.0
user-group system
group-attribute allow-guest
local-user admin
password cipher .]@USE=B,53Q=^Q`MAF4<1!!
authorization-attribute level 3
service-type telnet
service-type web
cwmp
undo cwmp enable
interface Aux0
async mode flow
link-protocol ppp
interface Cellular0/0
async mode protocol
link-protocol ppp
interface Ethernet0/0
port link-mode route
nat outbound 2001 address-group 1
nat server 1 protocol tcp global current-interface 3389 inside 192.168.100.20 3389
ip address dhcp-alloc
ipsec policy vpntest
interface Ethernet0/1
port link-mode route
ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
interface NULL0
interface Vlan-interface1
undo dhcp select server global-pool
dhcp server apply ip-pool vlan1ewaller wrote:
What is under the switches tab?
Oh -- By the way, that picture is over the size limit defined in the forum rules in tems of pixels, but the file size is okay. I'll let it slide. Watch the bumping as well.
If you want to post the switches tab, upload it to someplace like http://img3.imageshack.us/, copy the thumbnail (which has the link to the original) back here, and you are golden.
I had a bear of a time getting the microphone working on my HP DV4, but it does work. I'll look at the set up when I get home tonight [USA-PDT].
Sorry for the picture and the "bumping"... I have asked in irc in arch and alsa channels and no luck yet... one guy from alsa said I had to wait for the alsa-driver-1.0.24 package (currently I have alsa-driver-1.0.23) but it is weird because the microphone worked some months ago...
So here is what it is under the switches tab -
Cisco ASA Site to Site IPSEC VPN and NAT question
Hi Folks,
I have a question regarding both Site to Site IPSEC VPN and NAT. Basically what I want to achieve is to do the following:
ASA2 is at HQ and ASA1 is a remote site. I have no problem setting up a static static Site to Site IPSEC VPN between sites. Hosts residing at 10.1.0.0/16 are able to communicate with hosts at 192.168.1.0/24, but what i want is to setup NAT with IPSEC VPN so that host at 10.1.0.0/16 will communicate with hosts at 192.168.1.0/24 with translated addresses
Just an example:
Host N2 (10.1.0.1/16) will communicate with host N1 192.168.1.5 with destination lets say 10.23.1.5 not 192.168.1.5 (Notice the last octet should be the same in this case .5)
The same translation for the rest of the communication (Host N2 pings host N3 destination ip 10.23.1.6 not 192.168.1.6. again last octet is the same)
It sounds a bit confusing for me but i have seen this type of setup before when I worked for managed service provider where we had connection to our clients (Site to Site Ipsec VPN with NAT, not sure how it was setup)
Basically we were communicating with client hosts over site to site VPN but their real addresses were hidden and we were using translated address as mentioned above 10.23.1.0/24 instead of (real) 192.168.1.0/24, last octet should be the same.
Appreciate if someone can shed some light on it.Hi,
Ok so were going with the older NAT configuration format
To me it seems you could do the following:
Configure the ASA1 with Static Policy NAT
access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
static (inside,outside) 10.23.1.0 access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT
Because the above is a Static Policy NAT it means that the translation will only be done when the destination network is 10.1.0.0/16
If you for example have a basic PAT configuration for inside -> outside traffic, the above NAT configuration and the actual PAT configuration wont interfere with eachother
On ASA2 side you can normally configure NAT0 / NAT Exemption for the 10.1.0.0/16 network
access-list INSIDE-NONAT remark L2LVPN NONAT
access-list INSIDE-NONAT permit ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list INSIDE-NONAT
You will have to take into consideration that your access-list defining the L2L-VPN encrypted traffic must reflect the new NAT network
ASA1: access-list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN permit ip 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
ASA2: access-list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN permit ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
I could test this setup tomorrow at work but let me know if it works out.
Please rate if it was helpful
- Jouni -
ASA 5505 site-to-site VPN tunnel and client VPN sessions
Hello all
I have several years of general networking experience, but I have not yet had to set up an ASA from the ground up, so please bear with me.
I have a client who needs to establish a VPN tunnel from his satellite office (Site A) to his corporate office (Site Z). His satellite office will have a single PC sitting behind the ASA. In addition, he needs to be able to VPN from his home (Site H) to Site A to access his PC.
The first question I have is about the ASA 5505 and the various licensing options. I want to ensure that an ASA5505-BUN-K9 will be able to establish the site-to-site tunnel as well as allow him to use either the IPsec or SSL VPN client to connect from Site H to Site A. Would someone please confirm or deny that for me?
Secondly, I would like to verify that no special routing or configuration would need to take place in order to allow traffic not destined for Site Z (i.e., general web browsing or other traffic to any resource that is not part of the Site Z network) to go out his outside interface without specifically traversing the VPN tunnel (split tunneling?)
Finally, if the client were to establish a VPN session from Site H to Site A, would that allow for him to connect directly into resources at Site Z without any special firewall security rules? Since the VPN session would come in on the outside interface, and the tunnel back to Site Z goes out on the same interface, would this constitute a split horizon scenario that would call for a more complex config, or will the ASA handle that automatically without issue?
I don't yet have the equipment in-hand, so I can't provide any sample configs for you to look over, but I will certainly do so once I've got it.
Thanks in advance for any assistance provided!First question:
Yes, 5505 will be able to establish site-to-site tunnel, and he can use IPSec vpn client, and SSL VPN (it comes with 2 default SSL VPN license).
Second question:
Yes, you are right. No special routing is required. All you need to configure is site-to-site VPN between Site A and Site Z LAN, and the internet traffic will be routed via Site A internet. Assuming you have all the NAT statement configured for that.
Last question:
This needs to be configured, it wouldn't automatically allow access to Site Z when he VPNs in to Site A.
Here is what needs to be configured:
1) Split tunnel ACL for VPN Client should include both Site Z and Site A LAN subnets.
2) On site A configures: same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
3) Crypto ACL for the site-to-site tunnel between Site Z and Site A needs to include the VPN Client pool subnet as follows:
On Site Z:
access-list permit ip
On Site A:
access-list permit ip
4) NAT exemption on site Z needs to include vpn client pool subnet as well.
Hope that helps.
Message was edited by: Jennifer Halim -
Split Tunnel VPN and routing public ip traffic
Hi Everyone,
I have my split tunnel vpn working well but I need to make an adjustment. We have a few systems in the "cloud" and we only allow access from our corporate WAN IP to those servers. I need to be able to access those servers via VPN connection to the office. I added that public IP subnet to my interesting traffic and the vpn client is sending the traffic across the VPN as expected. The issue is that it somehow drops out inside the firewall it seems. Almost like it doesn't know how to route that request back out to the internet using it's own default gateway. Any thoughts as to what I may be missing, here is some of the relevant code
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
----Interesting Traffic------
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.26.0 255.255.255.0
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.61.0 255.255.255.0
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.3.128 255.255.255.192
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.40.128 255.255.255.240
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.40.64 255.255.255.192
access-list vpnpool standard permit 50.57.0.0 255.255.0.0 -- Network of cloud servers
---Natting----------
global (outside) 1 71.174.57.78
global (dmz) 1 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list 101
nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat (qa) 1 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0
nat (dmz) 1 10.1.11.0 255.255.255.0
nat (dmz2) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
---Rules and Gateway-------
access-group inbound in interface outside
access-group dmz in interface dmz
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 71.174.57.1 1
---VPN-----
group-policy xxx-remote internal
group-policy xxx-remote attributes
wins-server value 10.1.1.5
dns-server value 10.1.1.5 10.1.1.6
vpn-idle-timeout 60
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec webvpn
ipsec-udp enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnpool
default-domain value xxx.local
split-dns value xxxx.local
service-type remote-access
tunnel-group xxx-vpn type remote-access
tunnel-group xxx-vpn general-attributes
address-pool vpnpool
authentication-server-group (outside) RADIUS
authentication-server-group (dmz) RADIUS
default-group-policy xxx-remote
tunnel-group xxx-vpn ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key xxxxxThat was my mistake, I am mixing up code here. The fun of switching between new and old ASA code as well as routers
Let's do it this way, this should fix the problem. Put the NAT command the way it was as follows:
nat (Outside) 1 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0
Now we add a NAT0 for the Outside interface. You can reuse the ACL we made if you want or make a new one, your call since you have to administrate it.
no access-list VPN-NAT
access-list VPN-NAT0 permit ip 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
nat (Outside) 0 access-list VPN-NAT0
Now, this should properly NAT the traffic going to the Internet while excluding the traffic destined for your 10.0.0.0/8 subnet using the Nat 0.
Sorry for the round about fix, but that should take care of it.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why does my After Effects CS5.5 keep crashing on me when I switch to other apps?
I have Adobe After Effects CS5.5 (v.10.5.1) and it keeps crashing when switching between AE and other programs. Here's a video so you can see what's happening. I don't have any special plug-ins loaded except for what came with the program. OpenGL r
-
GNU compiled app crashes with signal 11: Segmentation Fault
Hi Community, I know this is not a GNU oriented forum, but maybe this is a common issue. We have a C++ multi-threaded application running properly in Solaris 9 Sparc. Due to some issues mostly related to the NICs we needed to have the application run
-
Can't change a Restricted Key Figure technical name in QD BEx 7.1.0
A few days ago I created a new Restricted Key Figure in Query Designer and it was autopopulated with a default technical name. So I immediately changed it to 'ZRNPVORDINTFACTPPP_FY'. Now, today, I realized that the 'F' in the technical name is a typ
-
JDBC Adapter Communication Channel error
I am getting this error for a JDBC Adapter, I waondering if anybody could point me in the right direction. I have installed the driver: JDBC Driver: oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver Connection: jdbc:oracle:thin:@146.146.78.74:1521:ts1 Error: Error whe
-
Can not install latest ATI mobility Radeon x1600 display driver for my Satellite A100
Hello, my Satellite A100-704 PSAA9E is equipped with the ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 display graphic card, for which ATI provides a new driver, named Catalyst 8.3. My issue is that when I run the verification software I get a message telling me that dr