Cisco 4000 & 3000 series ip route & ip default gateway

Dear all ;
I have Enterprise Network Contain :
- Foundry Big Iron work on layer 3 , and Combination of 4000 and 3000 and 2000 cisco switches work on layer 2;
management network for the switches is 192.168.100.0
Foundry Big Iron is 192.168.100.1
i use ip default-gateway 192.168.100.1 on all cisco switches.
all other subnets route through the foundry.
but when i ping from any subnet (192.168.15.0) to any 3000 or 2000 switches series it replay and when i ping to 4000 series it don't replay.
when i use default route command on 4000 series it replay.
i need some explanation
Kind Regards

In the original post it describes the Cisco switches as operating as layer 2 switches and I assume that in terms of how they are configured to forward traffic all the Cisco switches including the 4000 are configured only for layer 2 forwarding. But with IP routing enabled (as seems to have been the case on the 4000) the behavior of the switch becomes a bit different. In particular is the difference in how you identify the default route. For a switch that is layer 2 only you use the default-gateway command (which apparently worked fine for the 2000 and 3000 switches). But when you enable IP routing then the switch does not use the default-gateway to learn its default route and would look for some other mechanism to learn its default route. I am assuming that there was not any other mechanism and so the 4000 basically did not have a default route. When you configure no ip routing (which was good advice from Paul) then the 4000 stops working as layer 2 switch and at that point will use default-gateway to determine its default route.
HTH
Rick

Similar Messages

  • Cisco ISA 500 Series - Intervlan routing via 801.2q (Router on a stick)

    Hello to everyone,
    I am considering the ISA 550 for a customer who has multiple VLANs on his network.  In order to avoid purchase a layer3 switch, I was thinking that we could perhaps create a 802.1q trunk link from a switch to the ISA500 and perform Inter-VLAN routing through that. In addition, we would use access lists to prevent communications between specific VLANs.
    My question is if this setup model can be done on the ISA 550.  I haven't used it before, so I am not sure if it can support this setup.
    Any information or help is much appreciated.
    Many thanks,
    Chris.

    Chris, ISA550 can support the configuration you described.

  • IAS and Cisco Concentrator 3000 series?

    Is anyone authenticating their VPN users via Windows IAS, if so how. I would like them to be only to get on the network if they are in a particular Active Directory group (not local IAS users)
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes , it works fine. For network access you need to set up group policy.
    Regards,
    ~JG

  • Cisco works LMS 3.0.1 cannot archieve configuration for cisco 3000 series vpn concentrator

    Hi All,
    Our problem is, we have Cisco Works LMS 3.0.1. cannot archieve configuration for cisco 3000 series vpn concentrator.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Samir

    Make sure you have filled out all of the HTTP/HTTPS credential data in DCR for these devices.  RME will only use HTTPS to fetch VPN concentrator configurations.

  • Ask the Expert: Different Flavors and Design with vPC on Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches

    Welcome to the Cisco® Support Community Ask the Expert conversation.  This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about Cisco® NX-OS.
    The biggest limitation to a classic port channel communication is that the port channel operates only between two devices. To overcome this limitation, Cisco NX-OS has a technology called virtual port channel (vPC). A pair of switches acting as a vPC peer endpoint looks like a single logical entity to port channel attached devices. The two devices that act as the logical port channel endpoint are actually two separate devices. This setup has the benefits of hardware redundancy combined with the benefits offered by a port channel, for example, loop management.
    vPC technology is the main factor for success of Cisco Nexus® data center switches such as the Cisco Nexus 5000 Series, Nexus 7000 Series, and Nexus 2000 Series Switches.
    This event is focused on discussing all possible types of vPC along-with best practices, failure scenarios, Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) recommendations and troubleshooting
    Vishal Mehta is a customer support engineer for the Cisco Data Center Server Virtualization Technical Assistance Center (TAC) team based in San Jose, California. He has been working in TAC for the past 3 years with a primary focus on data center technologies, such as the Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches, Cisco Unified Computing System™ (Cisco UCS®), Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch, and virtualization. He presented at Cisco Live in Orlando 2013 and will present at Cisco Live Milan 2014 (BRKCOM-3003, BRKDCT-3444, and LABDCT-2333). He holds a master’s degree from Rutgers University in electrical and computer engineering and has CCIE® certification (number 37139) in routing and switching, and service provider.
    Nimit Pathak is a customer support engineer for the Cisco Data Center Server Virtualization TAC team based in San Jose, California, with primary focus on data center technologies, such as Cisco UCS, the Cisco Nexus 1000v Switch, and virtualization. Nimit holds a master's degree in electrical engineering from Bridgeport University, has CCNA® and CCNP® Nimit is also working on a Cisco data center CCIE® certification While also pursuing an MBA degree from Santa Clara University.
    Remember to use the rating system to let Vishal and Nimit know if you have received an adequate response. 
    Because of the volume expected during this event, Vishal and Nimit might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Network Infrastructure Community, under the subcommunity LAN, Switching & Routing, shortly after the event. This event lasts through August 29, 2014. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.

    Hello Gustavo
    Please see my responses to your questions:
    Yes almost all routing protocols use Multicast to establish adjacencies. We are dealing with two different type of traffic –Control Plane and Data Plane.
    Control Plane: To establish Routing adjacency, the first packet (hello) is punted to CPU. So in the case of triangle routed VPC topology as specified on the Operations Guide Link, multicast for routing adjacencies will work. The hellos packets will be exchanged across all 3 routers and adjacency will be formed over VPC links
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/operations/n5k_L3_w_vpc_5500platform.html#wp999181
    Now for Data Plane we have two types of traffic – Unicast and Multicast.
    The Unicast traffic will not have any forwarding issues, but because the Layer 3 ECMP and port channel run independent hash calculations there is a possibility that when the Layer 3 ECMP chooses N5k-1 as the Layer 3 next hop for a destination address while the port channel hashing chooses the physical link toward N5k-2. In this scenario,N5k-2 receives packets from R with the N5k-1 MAC as the destination MAC.
    Sending traffic over the peer-link to the correct gateway is acceptable for data forwarding, but it is suboptimal because it makes traffic cross the peer link when the traffic could be routed directly.
    For that topology, Multicast Traffic might have complete traffic loss due to the fact that when a PIM router is connected to Cisco Nexus 5500 Platform switches in a vPC topology, the PIM join messages are received only by one switch. The multicast data might be received by the other switch.
    The Loop avoidance works little different across Nexus 5000 and Nexus 7000.
    Similarity: For both products, loop avoidance is possible due to VSL bit
    The VSL bit is set in the DBUS header internal to the Nexus.
    It is not something that is set in the ethernet packet that can be identified. The VSL bit is set on the port asic for the port used for the vPC peer link, so if you have Nexus A and Nexus B configured for vPC and a packet leaves Nexus A towards Nexus B, Nexus B will set the VSL bit on the ingress port ASIC. This is not something that would traverse the peer link.
    This mechanism is used for loop prevention within the chassis.
    The idea being that if the port came in the peer link from the vPC peer, the system makes the assumption that the vPC peer would have forwarded this packet out the vPC-enabled port-channels towards the end device, so the egress vpc interface's port-asic will filter the packet on egress.
    Differences:  In Nexus 5000 when it has to do L3-to-L2 lookup for forwarding traffic, the VSL bit is cleared and so the traffic is not dropped as compared to Nexus 7000 and Nexus 3000.
    It still does loop prevention but the L3-to-L2 lookup is different in Nexus 5000 and Nexus 7000.
    For more details please see below presentation:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/session_14-_nexus.pdf
    DCI Scenario:  If 2 pairs are of Nexus 5000 then separation of L3/L2 links is not needed.
    But in most scenarios I have seen pair of Nexus 5000 with pair of Nexus 7000 over DCI or 2 pairs of Nexus 7000 over DCI. If Nexus 7000 are used then L3 and L2 links are required for sure as mentioned on above presentation link.
    Let us know if you have further questions.
    Thanks,
    Vishal

  • Cisco Aironet 1200 series AP's...

    Hi,
    The wireless at one of our remote sites was working fine until there was a problem one week back. Just for introduction we are using the following setups for wireless:
    independent wireless access-points whihc connect directly to the Cisco switches most 2950's..
    We have three vlans in LAN, vlan1 (for user - LAN), vlan-4 (for wireless users - EAP auth with MS-IAS s radius) and vlan-5 (for wireless scanners - MAC auth).
    All the AP's are 1231G series of devices.
    These AP's are connected to the switchports with a trunk, dot1Q enabled, vlan-4 as native vlan.
    Suddenly one day, 12 out of 15 AP's went offline, meaning: we were not able to ping any of them except 3 which were working fine. When checked at the switch we were able to see all 15 of them as CDP neighbor of the switches, even the ones which were not able to be pinged on the network. We were not able to ping them neither from the local L2 switch (IP on vlan-1) nor from the site router (default gateway of all the local subnets).
    I took the console connection of one of the not-working AP, it does not show any particular log or message. The Fastethernet0 port was UP/UP. I was not able to ping AP's default gateway. When I rebooted the AP, it was pinging from the network for about 2 mins and after that it was again off-network, not pinging. When the AP was reset to factory default, it was pinging fine for a long time, without any problems. When we put in the OLD configuration, again it was off-network, not pinging.
    Now, here is the surprising element for me! After 3 days of struggled troubleshoooting, remotely, onsite engineer changed the vlan allowed on the WAP connected trunk switchports (ie switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,5) i.e previously we were allowing 1, 4 and 5 vlans on the trunk, now he is allowing only 4 and 5. As soon as he made the changes, all of the not-working 12 WAP's became online one by one (as and when config change made on the trunk). Just to make another test and to make sure, I tried to allow all the vlans again and guess what the WAP was again off-networ - not pinging.
    Now my question is: Why it was all working fine for more than a year and then suddenly one day 'something' happened which caused the 12 AP's to behave abnormal while 3 of them were still working good.
    Is there any technical theory which can explain such type of behaviour?
    Thanks in advance,
    Gaurav

    Gaurav,
         If you have the ability to, I would put on AP back to the "non-working" scenario.  then check the ARP table to see if you are getting a duplicate mac or IP address.
    HTH,
    Steve
    Please remember to rate helpful posts or to mark the quesiton as answered so that it can be found later.

  • 3000 series concentrator and L2TP over IPSec

    All,
    Anyone have any wisdom they are willing to share regarding the establishment of a L2TP over IPSec tunnel between Mac OS X and a 3000 series concentrator? I believe that the concentrator is accepted the IKE SA proposal, but I can't get any further and I'm not able to get any useful information out of the logs on either side of the tunnel. The client side simply reports that "L2TP cannot connect to the server", the concentrator reports "Connection terminated for peer". It has clearly exchanged some valid information because the concentrator has assigned the traffic to the correct group (a non-default group I've set up specially to test this connection).
    Looking at the packet dump I can see the two devices exchange some information, then the client starts sending ISAKMP packets (quick mode) that the concentrator seems to ignore.
    Thoughts, suggestions, anecdotes etc. are all welcome.

    Try to adjust SA lifetime and the max connect time in VPN concentrator.
    Refer these links:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_tech_note09186a0080094eca.shtml
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_qanda_item09186a0080094cf4.shtml

  • Ask the Experts: Understanding Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Platform Architecture and Packet Forwarding Troubleshooting

    With Xander Thuijs
    Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn how to Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers with Cisco expert Xander Thuijs. The Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers product family offers a significant added value compared to the prior generations of carrier Ethernet routing offerings. The Cisco ASR 9000 Series is an operationally simple, future-optimized platform using next-generation hardware and software. The ASR 9000 platform family is composed of the Cisco ASR 9010 Router, the Cisco ASR 9006 Router, the Cisco ASR 9922 Router, Cisco ASR 9001 Router and the Cisco ASR 9000v Router.
    This is a continuation of the live Webcast.
    Xander Thuijs is a principal engineer for the Cisco ASR 9000 Series and Cisco IOS-XR product family at Cisco. He is an expert and advisor in many technology areas, including IP routing, WAN, WAN switching, MPLS, multicast, BNG, ISDN, VoIP, Carrier Ethernet, System Architecture, network design and many others. He has more than 20 years of industry experience in carrier Ethernet, carrier routing, and network access technologies. Xander  holds a dual CCIE certification (number 6775) in service provider and voice technologies. He has a master of science degree in electrical engineering from Hogeschool van University in Amsterdam.
    Remember to use the rating system to let Xander know if you have received an adequate response.
    Xander might not be able to answer each question because of the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Service Providers community XR OS And Platforms  shortly after the event. This event lasts through Friday, May 24, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.
    Webcast  related links:
    Slides
    Webcast  Video Recording
    FAQ

    Is there a Cisco lab available for ASR 9000
    we have "XR4U" stations coming available soon when XR 511 comes alive. The plan is for a downloadable play image like that. In the interim we have 2 demo systems available, and they can be booked via your account manager representative.
    How will MOD160 perform with multiple 9000NVS?
    very well. the mod 160 has 4 NPU's, 2 per bay. So if you have a 4x10 MPA to serve a satellite, you effectively have a single NPU per 20 1Gigs from the satellite. The pps performance will be stellar. However it might be price technically more ideal to connect satellite with a 36x10. Since the MOD-x has native MPA's with 1G also.
         2. Is there a shortcut for a Bundle-EthernetX interface, such as port-channel interface (poX), in Cisco IOS® ?.
    usability enhancement is there, we are trying to push this into a new reasonable release. follow CSCuh04526
         3. What  is the revolutions per minute (RPM) on these hard disk drives (HDDs)  compared to the solid state drives (SDDs)? Will the spinning drives be  slow?
    depends on the type we had avaialble at time of production, you will see different sizes and disks on the RSP2. the rpm of the HD is not so much an issue as much as the buffered writing we used to do in XR. This is fixed up with XR43 where the disk writing performance is much better. the HD/SDD is used for logging storage only (and maybe your pictures) but other then that we're not that concerned with write perf of the HD.
    regards
    xander

  • Flickering problem on screen - 3000 series N200 laptop

    Hello!
    I have a 3000 series N200 laptop (0769 type) for 3 years. Approximately 3 months ago, there was a screen problem that the screen had white vertical gridlines. Service replaced the chipset of the graphical card.
    Yesterday, a flickering problem has been appeared. I updated bios and display drivers from below link.
    http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/default.page?
    Could not get a solve with those updates. Then, I dismounted the front cover of screen. Re-assembled the LVDS FFC cable of the LCD display a couple of times, problem continued. Then, re-assembled the inverter cables. It also did not provide a solution.
    >See the problem photo (1.jpg) at below link.
    https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BweTh37k3ZRSQWYxRFNIWWpGSFE
    Please advise about this matter.
    Thanks.

    Hello suguz and welcome to community,
    As you have already updated the video driver and BIOS then you can check with adjusting the monitor refresh rate to 60Hrz.
    Kindly check the same issue in BIOS mode and if issue continues then it might fault with Lcd display.
    Best Regards,
    Tanuj
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution".! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

  • Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Power

    Can the 1310ap receive it's power from a POE switch?

    Hi Edward,
    Sadly the 1310 cannot be powered by PoE ,but, the Power Injector can be up to 100 meters away from the unit.
    Dual coaxial cable to run from the power injector to the 1300. See attached notes:
    Cisco Aironet 1300 Series
    Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Access Point/Bridge Power Injector
    The Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Outdoor Access Point/Bridge Power Injector,converts the standard 10/100 BaseT Ethernet interface that is suitable for weather protected areas to a dual F-Type connector interface for coax cables that are more suitable for harsh outdoor environments. The Power Injector also provides power to the outdoor unit over the same cables with a power discover feature and surge protection. To support longer cable runs from your wireless network switch or router, the Power Injector LR is designed to accommodate up to a 100 meter coaxial cable run plus 100 meters of indoor cat5 cable?enabling total cable runs up to 200 meters. The Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Outdoor Access Point/Bridge ships with the Power Injector LR2 and an AC power supply.
    From this link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5861/products_data_sheet09186a008022551d.html
    Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Outdoor Access Point/Bridge Hardware Installation Guide
    Ethernet Ports
    The access point/bridge dual-coax Ethernet ports consists of a pair of 75-ohm F-type connectors, linking the unit to your 100BASE-T Ethernet LAN through the power injector. The dual-coax cables are used to send and receive Ethernet data and to supply inline 48-VDC power from the power injector to the access point/bridge.
    Power
    The access point/bridge receives inline power from the Cisco Aironet Power Injector (hereafter called the power injector). Dual-coax cables are used to provide Ethernet data and power from the power injector to the access point/bridge. The power injector is an external unit designed for operation in a sheltered environment, such as inside a building or vehicle. The power injector also functions as an Ethernet repeater by connecting to a Category 5 LAN backbone and using the dual-coax cable interface to the access point/bridge.
    AIR-PWRINJ-BLR2
    F-Type Connectors
    Dual coaxial cable carries full-duplex Ethernet, DC power, and full-duplex console port (RS-232 connection)
    From this link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5861/products_data_sheet09186a00802252e1.html
    Hope this helps!
    Rob

  • Cascading RV180 as DHCP server but pointing to another default gateway router

    Hi,
    My network topology is as follows:
    Internet <-> Residential Gateway (RG) from ISP (OEM: Pace) [192.168.1.254/255.255.255.0] <-> RV180 [192.168.1.253/255.255.255.0] <-> SG500 switch [192.168.1.250/255.255.255.0] <-> rest of network.
    I know this is a cascading LAN-to-LAN arrangement. The cable from the RG to the RV180 is from a LAN port on the RG to a LAN (not WAN) port on the RV180.
    I eventually want to segment my network into a few VLANs from the RV180 down. I am aware most people would recommend DHCP on the "primary" router, but the RG is non-VLAN aware, so I figure I need to handle the DHCP off the RV180. At the same time, I have also opted not to do a LAN-to-WAN cascade because I want to retain the ability to configure the RG from the rest of the network and not have to cart a computer over to the RG to do it.
    On the RG, I've disabled DHCP, and placed 192.168.1.253 in the DMZ.
    On the RV180, I've enabled DHCP and put it in Router mode.
    The issue is that I do not have any Internet connectivity. If I allow the computers in the network to receive IP addresses over DHCP, the default gateway that is communicated is 192.168.1.253, which is the RV180. If I configure static IPv4 information on my computers to point to 192.168.1.254, I am able to connect outside, as you would expect.
    How can I get the RV180 to pass out DHCP IP addresses, but point to 192.168.1.254 as the default gateway? I thought the solution might be to create a default route (or something). I went to the static routes tab but it wouldn't let me enter 0.0.0.0 as a destination IP to route through 192.168.1.254.
    Further down the line, is it possible for both the RG and the RV180 to connect directly to the SG500, along with the other nodes in my network? That way the RV180 only serves to maintain the VLANs and pass out IP addresses via DHCP, instead of having it be the choke through which everything goes through on the way out?
    Sorry if there is a really obvious solution to this. It's really been floundering about in the dark so would appreciate any advice

    Hi Jason, I have considered your post here for quite some time. I came to one conclusion based off your text. The entire purpose of the RV180 is a DHCP server for multiple subnet / vlan.
    Here's the thing, you have a SG500 switch. Based off reading your text, this will do everything the RV180 can except the DHCP service. The limitation you are going to run in to is still going to be your gateway unit, the RG.
    In the end, even with such a configuration using the RV!80 or the SG500 (layer 3), the RG will have to be configured with static routes since the RG has no concept of those other LAN segments.
    Here is a post I wrote about a SG300 connecting to a RV0XX router (which doesn't understand the VLANs)
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3739083#3739083
    Using the concept of this topic, you may be able to add aditional static routes on the RV180 sending each subnet to the common IP interface of the RG.
    It would be very interesting to see if we could make that work.
    -Tom
    Please rate helpful posts

  • Lync 2013 Standard Edition on Cisco UCS E-Series

    Hello,
    We have a working Lync 2013 deployment:
    - Front-End Enterprise Pool consisting of 3 FE servers
    - one Edge Server
    - one Back-End server
    - one Mediation Server
    - one IP PBX gateway, where ITSP's SIP trunks end.
    Because we have geographically distributed offices, we are considering deploying of branch offices deployments.
    Technet recommends to use SBA for branch offices where there are less than 1000 users. But in case of WAN outage, no conferencing will be available for branch users.
    Lync 2013 Standard edition branch deployment would offer all Lync features in case of WAN outage.
    In every branch, we consider deploying a Cisco ISR G2 router for terminating branch SIP trunks. This equipment have option to add Cisco UCS E-Series blade that supports CPU with hardware virtualization and supports decent amount of RAM (up to 16GB and up
    to 48GB).
    Have anyone experience with deploying Lync Standard Edition on this equipment - Cisco UCS E-Series blades? In every branch office there are up to 50 - 500 users that will use Lync.
    Thanks,
    Andrei Moraru Endava

    Hi,
    I don’t think you can deploy Lync server 2013 on Cisco UCS E-Series blades.
    Here is a link below of “System Requirements for Servers Running Lync Server 2013” may help you:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398588.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • SecureCopy & 3000-series Concentrator...

    I have a requirement to have an open-source configuration management solution log into my concentrator & download its config for backup / version control purposes. Its name is "RANCID".
    I've enabled SSH, and I can log into the Private Interface with PuTTY just fine. When I use WinSCP 4.04, I have a problem. I authenticate just fine, but then the connection is dropped after 30 seconds. WinSCP tells me, "Incompatable shell, BASH prefered...". The concentrator tells me that the "PShell" is shutting down.
    question: Is this just an incompatability with WinSCP specifically? Do you think others would work? I know the 3000-series is old, and end-of-life. I'm using the next-to-latest build of OS for the Concentrator.

    Try to adjust SA lifetime and the max connect time in VPN concentrator.
    Refer these links:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_tech_note09186a0080094eca.shtml
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_qanda_item09186a0080094cf4.shtml

  • Dell Inspiron 11 3000 series

    I have an acer aspire one that has been trucking along for nearly 6 years now with almost continuous use (about a year of non-use time in there, but that's it). I use it primarily for taking notes in class and such, but it also sees a lot of programming and other use since I take it to campus each day and also on trips. In this time, I have lost almost all the feet and now screws are slowly disappearing. It also has started to have some overheating issues when the heatsink seems to shift positions slightly (it shuts off within 90 seconds when this happens). In addition, I find myself wishing quite often that it could do things like stream video properly (without jittering) and compile the kernel (it takes FOREVER on that tiny hyper threaded single core atom processor). So, I've been looking at a replacement that can get similar battery life, has a similarly sized screen (preferably touch as well because I think that would be great fun to use), more than 1Gb of RAM (I can have about 7 tabs open on chrome and then it starts having troubles since I have swap disabled), and a better processor. My most basic requirement, however, is that the laptop be able to run arch.
    I've been looking at the Dell Inspiron 11 3000 series since it seems to have the best battery life of my various 11.6" options out there. The processor is a dual core Celeron which sounds old and antiquated to me, even though I believe its based on Haswell (not sure there). It also has 4Gb RAM and 500Gb hard drive. Another option, for $50 more, is a pentium processor which sounds even more antiquated, but is still based on Haswell.
    http://www.dell.com/us/p/inspiron-11-31 … redir=true
    My question is this: Has anyone managed to get arch working on one of these things? I also imagine that the most new-fangled component would be the touchscreen, so does anyone know the general support of those for linux?
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hi,
    Does the WPF application develop by yourself? Please make sure that your application has no dependency issue, if your WPF application lacks of some libs or .Net framework, it cannot execute. Do you get any error message when you try to run it?
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • HP Officejet Pro 8500a prints slowly over wireless on Cisco Linksys Smart Wi-Fi Router EA6500

    I have the HP Officejet Pro 8500a. I recenrly change my wiress router to the Cisco Linksys Smart Wi-Fi Router EA6500.
    Nearly every time I print, the documement remains "pending" for at least several minutes, sometimes as long as 20, until it finally starts printing. Once it starts printing, the document is printed quickly.
    It doesn't matter the size of the document and the time it remains "pending." I've done test pages with just the word "test" in a Microsoft Word document, and it will remain in "pending" for well over five minutes.
    If I print over the USB cord, there are no delays.
    I need help. I can't figure out how to remedy this long delay when printing wirelessly.
    On a side note in case this is helpful, the Linksys router does have a priority setting where you can select up to three devices for priority access (faster connection?), which seems to be more for bandwidth-intensive devices. I tried adding both the laptop I'm printing from and the printer to this priority list, but that did not improve the print connection speed.
    Advice please! Thank you.

    Hi Jim-Gr,
    I understand you have an Officejet 8500A that has started printing very slowly after switching routers. I'm sorry to hear this has happened but will certainly do my best to assist you.
    I appreciate you advising that you have tried connecting the printer via USB and it does make a huge difference. I'm also assuming your previous router didn't go this slowly either. With the things you have tried, my assumption is that it's a setting in the router that needs to be changed. If you're not sure how to change things in your router you can generally call the router company and they will walk you through it.
    First you will want to ask them if there are any firmware updates for your router, if there are have them perform the update. If it is up to date already then have them make sure your router is broadcasting at a frequency of 2.4 GHz as that's the only frequency the printer works with.
    Second, you will want to make sure the following ports are open:
    UDP: 427, 161, 137, 138
    TCP: 9100, 9220, 9500, 137, 139, 427
    Once all of this is updated, then I would suggest you power cycle everything (turn off the printer and the PC, pull the power on the router for 30 seconds and then turn the other two back on once lights are back to normal) and try again. This should allow your printing speed to go back to normal
    Hope this helps, have a great day!
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post resolved your issue, as it will help others find the solution faster
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    **MissTeriLynn**
    I work on behalf of HP

Maybe you are looking for