CK666 error in cross company code cost estimate

Dear All,
We have activated multiple valuations/transfer prices : legal, group and profit center valuations.
We perform cost estimate run in ck40n for profit center valuation and get error
Material 20000035/plant FZ03: Transfer price could not be found.
Message no. CK666
Diagnosis
When switching profit center A ->B (from the material component to the costing object), a transfer price could not be determined for transfer price variant 0 in respect of material 20000035 in plant 1.
System Response
If you carry out costing for a profit center valuation, material 20000035 goes into the cost estimate without a value.
If you create a cost estimate for group valuation, profit from material 20000035 is not transferred into the cost component split.
Procedure
Check the settings for transfer price variant 0.
We have checked this material. Manufacturing plant belongs to company code A.
To get cost estimate for plant 2 which belongs to company code B we use procurement types in material master.
It requires now transfer price variant. But we do not want to use this functionality.
How can we solve this issue?
With best regards,
Kamila.

HI Kamila.
There is a difference in the way PCA handles determining costs:
If transfer prices are activated it's necessary to determine either a transfer price via pricing or to exclude the relevant material
from the transfer prices scenario via user-exit 'EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003'.
Please note that the determination of a transfer price and the creation of additional PCA lines are independent of each other. You cannot control the determination of a transfer price by means of your 0KEK settings. So if you want that no transfer price is used for a material please use exit 'EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003' here. Pricing will then not be called and the system automatically uses the current
material price from the profitcenter view.
Please have a look at the note [458543 |https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000458543]which provides further information regarding this exit.
Regards,Declan

Similar Messages

Cross company code cost center allocation

Hello experts,
I would like to know if cross company code cost center allocations is possible or not ?
Please let me know.
Newcom

hi its possiable,
can u give a senario, i will explain to u.
for ex:
com code1 having dept x
com code 2 also have a possiablities to have same c ctr dept x
thanqu

Document splitting error in cross company code invoice

Hi
I am trying to post an invoice through FB60 which is belong to multiple company code.
while simulating the document, system is not able to find the cost object (profit centre) for vendor line item. following is the detail of the transaction:-
Trasnaction Code - FB60
Vendor (co code 1000) - Cr     10000
Exp       (co code 1000) - Dr               5000
Exp       (co code 2000) - Dr               5000
Customization detail -
Item category for vendor reconciliation a/c -           03000
item cateogry for inter company clearing a/c -        01000
item cateogry for inter company customer a/c -      02000
Business Trasaction for document type (IC) used in FB60 - 0000. In document type IC i have allowed intercompany trnaction.
can anybody revert where i am missing the configuration. what additional i need to do to get out this error.
please revert
Regards
DD

Hello,
I also faced similar problem with posting cross company transacation whereby one of the document containing another Customer/Vendor line item which is not the intercompany clearing account. Both the additional Vendor/Customer and the Intercompany Vendor/Customer line items failed to derive the Profit Center information from the offsetting line items. The system recognize the Customer/Vendor line items (additional and Intercompany clearing) as "Leading Items" instead of derivating.
The journal looks like below.
CoCd A
dr. GL Account        [PC-A]   100
cr. ICT Vendor-B                   (100)   --> successfully deriving the [PC-A] information
CoCd B
dr. ICT Customer-A                  100      --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
cr. Customer                         (100)   --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
dr. GL Account       [PC-B]    100
cr. GL Account       [PC-B]    (100)
The GL Account in CoCd B are registered under Item Category "01000" and it has been registered as the splitting base item for the "ICT Customer-A" and "Cusomer" accounts.
Would really appreciate your kind help or suggestion to solve this issue.
Thanks a lot in adavance!
Regards,
Nurul F

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Changing controlling area from single company code to cross company code

Hi,
Due to my client requirement, in the middle of the year, we need to change the controlling area from being same as company code to cross company code controlling area. Although the currency is same. We are going to create a new company code. Is the changing controlling area settings possible to do? what are the precautions and changes need to be taken?
One more question, we need to change the company code when the new company code is created in the system in Cost Center Masters in the middle of the year. Is this possible after changing controlling area from single company code to cross company code. Right now company code is not appearing in the cost center master.
Thanks & Regards,
Saidarao

Hi,
If both companies having transaction data its not possible,Normally before defining Organisational Strucutre only we have to deside both companies is assigning same controlling are or have to maitain separately for this we have to compare the Fiscal year,Operating chart of accounts ,if both having same then we will assign both the company codes to one controlling area if these two companies having different currencies also its not a problem.When we creating Controlling Area we have to choose option of controlling area as same company code (if one company code one controlling Area) for example if you assigning two companies then we have to use cross company code cost accounting.If u need any further information let me know.
Regards,
Satya

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Cross Company code Transaction error

Hi,
When I am posting below Cross company code transaction getting error - Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled.
Vendor A/c - Company code1
To Bank clearing A/c - Company code2
Problem is profit center is not deriving for Vendor reconciliation A/c. We cannot make a default profit center this.
When I am posting cross company code invoice it is correclty deriving the profit center for the same reconciliation a/c.
Also I do not see any mistake in document splitting configuration.
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards
Shanu

Hi
Check the following things:
1. In KE52, the profit center entered in Bank Clearing Account Item in Co Code B is also assigned in Co Code A. Then system will allow you to post the cross co code document
2. Are you using the correct Document Type while posting the transaction. IN your Document Type Definition in OBA7, the check boxes for Inter Co posting and Trading Partner (Trading Partner only if inter co elimination is being used) have been ticked
3. You have assigned the correct item category to vendor reconcilliation account (Should be Vendor GL), Inter co Clearing account (Balance sheet Account ) and Bank Clearing account (balance sheet) have been assigned in your configuration
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
<a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">sai baba wallpaper</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>

While doing cross company code postings I get an error

Hi experts,
I have an issue on cross company code postings through FB60. There is a vendor account which has been extended to both company codes. The amount of invoice is Rs.10000 of which 6000 to be accounted in company code 1000 and 4000 in company code 5000. When this is done we get an error 'A unique company code has not been assigned to company number A001'.
After trying several options, I have found one solution. In the test system I Went to classify FI document types for document splitting, against document type KR transaction 0300 (Vendor invoice) was there. I changed to 0000 (unspecified posting). Once this was done, I was able to post cross company transactions without any problem.
I would like to know as to what would be the impact? Would this change create any other issue?
I request you to give your expert opinion on this.
Regards,
Ramkumar B.
Duplicate thread, therefore it will be locked, please avoid creating different threads for the same subject.
check the responses in thread While doing cross company code postings I get an error
FI Moderator

Dear,
When you are posting vendor Invoice through FB60 then system creates accounting document "KR" and when document splitting is activated in system the you have to assign Doc type KR to Transaction 0300 and 0001.
This is standard requirement. There will not be any changes by doing this.
Hope it is clear..
Br,Vivek

Cross company code transaction error in F-48

Dear all
I have a problem in cross company code posting. I have done all the settings like company codes are assigned to company(OX16) and i maintained gl accounts in OBYA also. When i am trying to post cross company code posting i am getting the error:
A unique company code has not been assigned to company number XXXXXX
Message no. GLT0001
Diagnosis
Document breakdown is active in your system. In certain cases, a company code is derived from the company ID number, and this must lead to the assignment of a unique company code.
A unique company code could not be assigned to company number XXXXXX.
System Response
You cannot carry out the required posting.
Procedure
Assign one company code to company number XXXXXX.
Please tel me wt setting i have to do in system.
Thanks in advance
Thanks and Regards
Girish.

Hi Chandra,
Thanks for your information.
I tried in OB60 BUT still same error i am facing. we have activated document splitting .IF document splitting is deactivated then its working fine ,When document splitting is activated then we have facing this error,
If any notes or any setting please guide me.
Thanks and Regards
Girish

FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)

Hi expert,
I am going to reverse a document (after resetting through LSMW,useing -F.80 as for mass reversal) and getting a error massage below(this document has been generated after F110)
FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)
Please advise me how can I reverse this document and also advise me what does it mean,
Will it be done by FBU8? (But when I am using it,showing two documents what does it mean and advise should I select both document for reversal)
Please advise
Thanks & Regards

Hi
Thanks for your quick advise,
I am trying to do that through FBU8 but I am getting there two documents numbere inside for reversal (it contained two documents)
Should I reverse both documents or I should select one one only
Please advise why it is showing two documents inside
Thanks & Regards

Cross-Company code posting Error

Hi Experts,
When I am trying to Post an intercompany transaction facing an error "A unique company code has not been assigned to company number XXXX"
Scenario:
1. Company code 1 debit
2. company code 2 credit
In simulation I can see the line items as below
Cocd PK    GL Acct     Amount
IN01   40     1                100           Expense acct
IN02   50     2                100           Expense Acct
IN02   40     3                100          Inter comp clerg acct
IN01   50     4                100         Inter Comp Clerg Acct.
but still above said error message is pops up:
rgd
YJ

Hai Ravi,
Thanks for the link,
From the document split settings i can able to post an Inter-co document and that is : Expense of company code 1 to Expense of Company Code2. But In case of Vendor invoice (F-43) - Liability for Comp code 1 and Expense for Comp Code 2. In vendor case scenario I am still facing the same error.
My doubt on this error is how the line item of Comp code 1 can derive the profit Center (PC1) information when entry is as below:
Trnsct      Compcode       Amt           Profit Center
Vendor          1               10000
Expesne        2               10000         PC2
Your suggestion or assistance on this is highly appreciated.
rgd
YJ

Cross-company code postings - FI validation

Hi,
We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
1)
IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC rule
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
2)
IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
Please advise what I am missing.

Hi Nitin,
Thank you for your feeback.
I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
For example:
Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
The systen creates two postings:
Posting 1: company code A
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300;
Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
Posting 2: company code B
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
Thank you,
Inna

Cross company code validation in CO Area

Dear All Experts,
I am having one query regarding cross company code validation in CO area. I have ticked Cross company code validation in controlling area, and it is working perfect.
we have total 11 company codes. 10 for US & 1 for Canada. Say 1001 to 1010 US company codes & Canda it is 1101.
The requirement is :-
Now client wants to post cross company code transaction within these 10 US company codes and it should not throw an error ( Ideally which is giving right now ). It should give error only when posting to US company code transaction and Canada Cost Center or Internal Order.
Can we restrict the company code for cross posting validation ? OR Can selected company codes set for validation indicator ?
Experts guidance will be great on this.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Dear,
Murali.
Thanks for your reply.
As you said :- Validation check applies for all the company codes which are assigned to your controlling area.
Means simply we can not apply this option to selective company codes, Right ?
Once it is ticked it is applicable to all company codes.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario

Hi
We have the following business scenario:
(Please note : Document splitting with Real time CO-FI integration is active)
1)one company(say, Co.code X) purchases on behalf of another group
company(Co.code Y)
2)the cost center of Co.code Y is given in the 'Account assignment' tab
in the Purchase order created in 'X'.
3)The PO is created in foreign currency
4)So, when the Goods receipt happens, the expense posting is happening
in Co.code Y and the GRIR entry is in X.
5)When the invoice is posted in co.code X, the Vendor Open item (in
foreign currency) gets created in X.
6)The problem occurs when Forex.valuation is done for the Vendor open
item. The Forex.gain/loss is getting posted in Co.code X by deriving
the Cost object from the expense posting in Co.code Y. Now, the system
is giving an error message 'CO object doesnt belong to X co.code'
I beleive this is the way document splitting normally works by deriving
the CO object form the original expense posting onto the subsequent
documents but I guess, it is failing in this scenario. Please let me
know if there is a work around to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ravi

We normally do the independent splitting of documents in respective company codes (This being the limitation mentioned by SAP for cross company code postings).
In the document split configuration, for Define document splitting rule, check for the leading item for cross company code transactions, and check for the item categories to be edited. The following two entries will be there
1100 Company Code Clearing CC = CC of leading item
1100 Company Code Clearing CC <> CC of leading item
In case of independent splitting, remove the first entry and check.
Thanks and Regards,
Mamta Sarda

Restrict cross CO area postings and allow cross company code postings

" There are two Controlling areas CA01 and CA02, for the controlling area CA02 the field CO code validation is inactive to allow cross company code postings ie., (Cost center created in one company code can be used as cost object in other company code ) Also this allows any WBS element created in controlling area CA01 as cost object in any of the company codes assigned in controlling area CA02,
Due to usage of WBS element which is created in CA01 controlling area as cost object in company code belongs to controlling area CA02, business is facing problem while doing the settlement run with error message " Document data for list of origins does not exist"
So, I have activated the field Co code validation in the controlling area CA02, which stopped the usage of WBS element between controlling areas. Also this had restricted usage of cost object between company codes with in controlling area CA02.
Now is there anyway to allow cost object usage between company codes assigned in one controlling area (CA02) and restrict usage of WBS element created in controlling area CA01 in any company code assigned in controlling area CA02.

Hi,
As you have already activated the Co Code validation you cant restrict that only to WBS. But you can have another option
Use the validation process to restrict these errors
This may help
Regards
Shantanu

CK666 error in cross company code cost estimate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for