Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario

Hi
We have the following business scenario:
(Please note : Document splitting with Real time CO-FI integration is active)
1)one company(say, Co.code X) purchases on behalf of another group
company(Co.code Y)
2)the cost center of Co.code Y is given in the 'Account assignment' tab
in the Purchase order created in 'X'.
3)The PO is created in foreign currency
4)So, when the Goods receipt happens, the expense posting is happening
in Co.code Y and the GRIR entry is in X.
5)When the invoice is posted in co.code X, the Vendor Open item (in
foreign currency) gets created in X.
6)The problem occurs when Forex.valuation is done for the Vendor open
item. The Forex.gain/loss is getting posted in Co.code X by deriving
the Cost object from the expense posting in Co.code Y. Now, the system
is giving an error message 'CO object doesnt belong to X co.code'
I beleive this is the way document splitting normally works by deriving
the CO object form the original expense posting onto the subsequent
documents but I guess, it is failing in this scenario. Please let me
know if there is a work around to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ravi

We normally do the independent splitting of documents in respective company codes (This being the limitation mentioned by SAP for cross company code postings).
In the document split configuration, for Define document splitting rule, check for the leading item for cross company code transactions, and check for the item categories to be edited. The following two entries will be there
1100 Company Code Clearing CC = CC of leading item
1100 Company Code Clearing CC <> CC of leading item
In case of independent splitting, remove the first entry and check.
Thanks and Regards,
Mamta Sarda

Similar Messages

Document splitting error in cross company code invoice

Hi
I am trying to post an invoice through FB60 which is belong to multiple company code.
while simulating the document, system is not able to find the cost object (profit centre) for vendor line item. following is the detail of the transaction:-
Trasnaction Code - FB60
Vendor (co code 1000) - Cr     10000
Exp       (co code 1000) - Dr               5000
Exp       (co code 2000) - Dr               5000
Customization detail -
Item category for vendor reconciliation a/c -           03000
item cateogry for inter company clearing a/c -        01000
item cateogry for inter company customer a/c -      02000
Business Trasaction for document type (IC) used in FB60 - 0000. In document type IC i have allowed intercompany trnaction.
can anybody revert where i am missing the configuration. what additional i need to do to get out this error.
please revert
Regards
DD

Hello,
I also faced similar problem with posting cross company transacation whereby one of the document containing another Customer/Vendor line item which is not the intercompany clearing account. Both the additional Vendor/Customer and the Intercompany Vendor/Customer line items failed to derive the Profit Center information from the offsetting line items. The system recognize the Customer/Vendor line items (additional and Intercompany clearing) as "Leading Items" instead of derivating.
The journal looks like below.
CoCd A
dr. GL Account        [PC-A]   100
cr. ICT Vendor-B                   (100)   --> successfully deriving the [PC-A] information
CoCd B
dr. ICT Customer-A                  100      --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
cr. Customer                         (100)   --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
dr. GL Account       [PC-B]    100
cr. GL Account       [PC-B]    (100)
The GL Account in CoCd B are registered under Item Category "01000" and it has been registered as the splitting base item for the "ICT Customer-A" and "Cusomer" accounts.
Would really appreciate your kind help or suggestion to solve this issue.
Thanks a lot in adavance!
Regards,
Nurul F

Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
Message no. F5786
Diagnosis
You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
System Response
You cannot enter this kind of document.
Procedure
Enter the transaction in two documents.
For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
JBC.

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

How to break the document line items in cross company code document

Hi,
Currently the cross company code posting is summing up all the line items and posting as a single line item as long as the line items are having the same tax code.
The system will break the line items only if there are non-identical tax codes. How can i change this default behaviour to break the line items in all cases?
http://wikisend.com/download/436966/2.zip

It is the standard SAP behaviour to sum up all the identical tax code values.

Remittance challan creation problem in Cross company code scenario.

I made to Advance payment to Cross comany code while posting time we deduct the TDS amount. at the time remiottance challan creation i got bellow error.please help to me
No unpaid tax lines exist for the given selection criteria.
Message no. 8I702
Diagnosis
The corresponding withholding tax line &1& is not present in WITH_ITEM table.
System Response
For withholding tax recovered from the vendor, tax line is present in table BSIS, but the corresponding entry is missing in table WITH_ITEM , which is necessary for challan updation. Check the entries.
Procedure
check entries in table WITH_ITEM for the open tax items chosen for clearing.
Edited by: TEEGALA SATISH on Jun 15, 2010 5:43 PM

Hi ...Actually i am getting same problem in challan creation.. Did you get any solution? ...

Cross company code scenario?

Dear Gurus,
I have 2 company codes and in each company code 2 plats are there.
One purchase organization is responsible for all 4 plants.
In customization, i m assigning this purchase org to 2 company codes.
is it okay?
pls suggest..

Hi,
If only one purchasing organization is responsible for all 4 plants, then you need not assign this purchasing organisation to company code.
You can assign this purchasing organization to all four plants.
You can not assign one purchasing organization to two company codes in SAP.
If you assign a purchasing organization to one company code. It will be company code-specific purchasing organization.In your case purchasing organization is not company code specific.
Hope it wil help u.
Deepak.

Document Splitting Cross Company Code

Hello
In our company we are using business area for internal reporting. For cross company code transaction we have assigned vendor and customer in the configuration. In the document splitting settings for cross company code transaction we did a setting that every company code should have document splitting separately (Split each document in each company code separately.
In this case there should be only one entry in the splitting rule for the item category to be edited - 01100 CC <> CC of leading item.)
We normally received vendor invoice where expense belong to several company code but invoice belong to one company code.
Example Invoice amount 1200
vendor liability in company code SA02
Expense 200 for company code SA02 and 1000 in company code SA03
When we simulate the document in general ledger view, system create 4 line item in company code SA02 one Expense Dr, Vendor Credit and two line item with zero balance. In two line items system showing no business area. We want system to post only two line item and none of the entries should be without business area
Thanks and best regards

Hi
System is simulating the following entries
C>C                                 PK           Account                                    Amount
SA02     1     000001     31          311001     T/P - 3rd Party                            1,200.00-     SAR                         4449
SA02     2     000002     40          515011     External Persl-NonOR             200.00     SAR                         4449
SA02     3     000003     01          146501     Claims/Bchar,ABB SBA            1,000.00     SAR
SA02          000004     50          999001     BA Clearing A/C                    1,000.00-     SAR
SA02          000005     40          999001     BA Clearing A/C                    1,000.00     SAR                        4449
SA03     1     000001     40          515011     External Persl-NonOR            1,000.00     SAR                       2880
SA03     2     000002     31          326001     Non T/P - ABB SBA                   1,000.00-     SAR                       2880
Now if you see in company code SA02 for receivable form SA03 system is not deriving the business area and in order to balance this entry by BA system is creating zero balance entry
Thanks and Best Rregards

While doing cross company code postings I get an error

Hi experts,
I have an issue on cross company code postings through FB60. There is a vendor account which has been extended to both company codes. The amount of invoice is Rs.10000 of which 6000 to be accounted in company code 1000 and 4000 in company code 5000. When this is done we get an error 'A unique company code has not been assigned to company number A001'.
After trying several options, I have found one solution. In the test system I Went to classify FI document types for document splitting, against document type KR transaction 0300 (Vendor invoice) was there. I changed to 0000 (unspecified posting). Once this was done, I was able to post cross company transactions without any problem.
I would like to know as to what would be the impact? Would this change create any other issue?
I request you to give your expert opinion on this.
Regards,
Ramkumar B.
Duplicate thread, therefore it will be locked, please avoid creating different threads for the same subject.
check the responses in thread While doing cross company code postings I get an error
FI Moderator

Dear,
When you are posting vendor Invoice through FB60 then system creates accounting document "KR" and when document splitting is activated in system the you have to assign Doc type KR to Transaction 0300 and 0001.
This is standard requirement. There will not be any changes by doing this.
Hope it is clear..
Br,Vivek

Cross Company Code purchasing

Hi,
Please help me to concept of Cross Company Code purchasing .
I need a Document regarding this or configuration setting , its requirement from one of our client.
So pls send me some document about the Cross Company Code Transaction.
Thanks
Mukesh

Hi,
Refer to the link given below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/4b9036dfe4b703e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Even when the plants involved in a stock transfer belong to different company codes, you can use conventional methods to transfer the stock:
By transferring the stock between plants in one or two steps
By carrying out a stock transport order without the delivery function via Shipping
By carrying out a stock transport order with the delivery function via Shipping
In these cases, the value of the transfer posting is posted to a company code clearing account in both the issuing and the receiving plants. The stock transfer is posted at the valuation price of the material in the issuing plant.
Stock Transport Order with Delivery Via Shipping and Billing Document/Invoice
You can carry out stock transfers with the delivery and billing function. In this procedure, the stock is transferred in the form of a sale between two plants.
Stock transfers that include deliveries and billing documents/invoices are only possible between plants belonging to different company codes.
If you want to carry out a cross-company-code stock transport order with delivery but without a billing document, you must set the Relevant for Billing (data element FKREL) indicator in Customizing of the item type to "blank" (Not relevant for billing).
When you use the delivery function in Shipping, the whole transaction - from the delivery through billing and invoice verification - is reflected in the system. The following Shipping functions are available for this:
Delivery:
For example, planning shipping activities, picking, packing
Billing:
For example, price determination
Before you can use a stock transport order with the delivery function and a billing document, the plant must be assigned to a vendor. You maintain the vendor - plant assignment in the vendor master record.
If a user enters a vendor when creating a stock transport order, the plant is automatically copied from the vendor master record.
A stock transport order with delivery and billing is a mixture of a standard purchase order and a stock transport order: as in the standard purchase order, when items are entered (standard items with no item category) price determination is carried out and shipping data established; as in the stock transport order, the transfer of stocks from one location to another is monitored.
Stock Transport Order with Valuated and Non-Valuated Sales Order Stock
When entering goods issues for cross-company-code stock transport orders, you can work with both valuated and non-valuated sales order stock (E) using the one-step procedure (movement type 645) and the two-step procedure (movement type 643). In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4) you define from which stock material is to be withdrawn by selecting the Dependent requirements indicator for individual and collective requirements. There are three options:
Indicator set to Blank (individual and collective requirements): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 1 (individual requirements only): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 2 (collective requirements only): material is removed from unrestricted-use standard stock
Prices
In Purchasing, the price of the material in question is determined in the usual manner (from the info record, for example).
In SD, pricing is also carried out as normal during the billing process.
Your company has to maintain settings in the Customizing system determining whether stock transfers between two plants should be with or without billing.
You can also determine whether individual users can carry out stock transfers, for example, with or without billing or in either of the two ways.
If you choose Purchase Order ® Create ® Stock Transfer (i.e. a stock transport order without billing) and stock transfer with billing has been defined for the plants in Customizing, a message appears indicating that you should create a standard purchase order.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.
Edited by: RAVI SHANKAR H.N on Jan 12, 2009 10:45 AM

CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

Have you considered using this user-exit?
User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
Thanks,
Ben

Directly display cross company code document overview in FBL1N

Hi Buddy
My user wants to display cross company code document overview in FBL1N Directly, after execute.
Instead of going FBL1N --> execute --> Vendor line item display --> once click on cross company code document number than it will take to Display document at lie item level --> once click on call up document overview (F9) than it will display cross company code document overview in FBL1N
It suggested to user we can use FBU3 for cross company code document overview.
But user wants in FBL1N --> execute --> Vendor line item display --> once click on cross company code document number -->than it has to display cross company code document overview in FBL1N.
Is there any possibility in FBL1N or ells we need to create Z. T CODE? For the same.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
asuvamsi

Hi, Experts,
Once i execute the report FBL1N with user's user ID, i have double click on docuement and i click on document overview(At mountain button) it is displaying the respective comapny code wise docuement overview
if i am executing with our user ID it is displaying cross company code docuement overview once click on document overview (At mountain button)
How it possible i have checked SU53 T.code also, there are no authorization problem for both user ID's
Could any body please give me suggestions on the same.
Thanks.
Regards
asuvamsi
Edited by: asuvamsi on Dec 28, 2011 11:24 AM

Cross company code reversal of an asset document does not reverse all docs

hi,
i have reversed a cross company code document which has posted to 2 different assets in 2 different companies. when i reversed this cross company code document, the system reversed only the first document in the first company and it does not reverse the second document in the second company. It says the second document cannot be reversed with the simple information message.
how can we solve this?

Hi,
can you check if SAP note 1273856 solves your problem?
Regards,
Markus

How to use Cross Company Code document number as Reffrence.

Hi
Actually user wants to post the same debit credit line items with Editing the amounts which he has posted last month
So i suggested him to use post refference of the previous month document number.
Since that is Cross company document number. There is no source to give in T.Code FBR2. There is a fecility to give only document number of a company code not cross company code.
Assume that there are 3 company's involved in that document.
company X --- 25 line items
company Y -- 75 line items
Company Z -- 100 line items
Since he given in header data X Co code it has generated the Cross company code document number 1000X 08 ( which means 1000 is doc.number X is company code 08 is year. This is sap standard cross company code doc number format)
and individual document number is
X - 1000
Y- 2000
Y- 3000
If he post with the reffrence of X company only 25 lines will come remaining 175 line he as to post manually.
If he take Y Doc number only 75 lines will come
If he take Z Doc number only 100 lines will come
To bring all lines there is no provision to give Cross company Doc number.
Please advice how to use cross company doc number as refference.
Tks
Shivaji

Hi guru
This is answered
Thanks
shivaji

Cross-Company Code document and Taxes

Dear all,
I am posting a cross-company code document with the following characteristics:
Company A - debit A/R, credit revenue
Company B - credit A/P, debit expense account
The document is balanced within each company code, so the I-C clearing accounts are not posted to.
The problem is that we have taxes on both company codes but it seems (correct if I am wrong) that SAP only posts taxes to the first company code although the documentation says that in certain circumstances it takes the line item company code in order to post the tax. Unfortunately, it doesn't say "how" this is possible and neither gives additional information.
So, my questions are:
- Is it possible to enter a tax code for each company?
- considering that the local currencies of company A and B are not the same (one is in US, the other in Europe), is it true that the transfer tax program (RFBUST10) does not work?
Your suggestions in how to post taxes to both company codes are appreciated. Thanks.

Check BKPF-BVORG field. this cross company co ref will be same in both documents.

Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for