Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Similar Messages

Cross-company code functionality using Idoc type FIDCCP02

Hello,
I have a problem I need to use an IDoc to create incoming invoices from a legacy system, but there are 2 functionalities that need to exist.
1.- Extended withholding taxes.
2.- Cross-company code.
I have been using the basic type FIDCCP02, because it was easy to use extended withholding taxes.
But now the functional team requested us to implement the functionality Cross-company code.
I did some test using ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT03, where just specifying 2 different company codes at item level, SAP will create 2 different invoices one for each company code) ,
The problem here is that I need both functionality, but only use 1 Idoc type. Do you know how can I solve this problem??

Imelda ,
I am also trying to use FIDCCP02 Idoc for Cross-Company code functionality , and we are not able to do it ..
I saw this message in SDN posted by you last year but it was not answered , hence was wondering if you were at some point of time able to get any answer on this one OR did you find any solution by yourself on this issue.
I would also like to use Cross-company code functionality using FIDCCP02 , so please let me know if you have anything on this one .
Would appreciate your reply .
Thanks,
Ashutosh Chitrao

Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario

Hi
We have the following business scenario:
(Please note : Document splitting with Real time CO-FI integration is active)
1)one company(say, Co.code X) purchases on behalf of another group
company(Co.code Y)
2)the cost center of Co.code Y is given in the 'Account assignment' tab
in the Purchase order created in 'X'.
3)The PO is created in foreign currency
4)So, when the Goods receipt happens, the expense posting is happening
in Co.code Y and the GRIR entry is in X.
5)When the invoice is posted in co.code X, the Vendor Open item (in
foreign currency) gets created in X.
6)The problem occurs when Forex.valuation is done for the Vendor open
item. The Forex.gain/loss is getting posted in Co.code X by deriving
the Cost object from the expense posting in Co.code Y. Now, the system
is giving an error message 'CO object doesnt belong to X co.code'
I beleive this is the way document splitting normally works by deriving
the CO object form the original expense posting onto the subsequent
documents but I guess, it is failing in this scenario. Please let me
know if there is a work around to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ravi

We normally do the independent splitting of documents in respective company codes (This being the limitation mentioned by SAP for cross company code postings).
In the document split configuration, for Define document splitting rule, check for the leading item for cross company code transactions, and check for the item categories to be edited. The following two entries will be there
1100 Company Code Clearing CC = CC of leading item
1100 Company Code Clearing CC <> CC of leading item
In case of independent splitting, remove the first entry and check.
Thanks and Regards,
Mamta Sarda

Remittance challan creation problem in Cross company code scenario.

I made to Advance payment to Cross comany code while posting time we deduct the TDS amount. at the time remiottance challan creation i got bellow error.please help to me
No unpaid tax lines exist for the given selection criteria.
Message no. 8I702
Diagnosis
The corresponding withholding tax line &1& is not present in WITH_ITEM table.
System Response
For withholding tax recovered from the vendor, tax line is present in table BSIS, but the corresponding entry is missing in table WITH_ITEM , which is necessary for challan updation. Check the entries.
Procedure
check entries in table WITH_ITEM for the open tax items chosen for clearing.
Edited by: TEEGALA SATISH on Jun 15, 2010 5:43 PM

Hi ...Actually i am getting same problem in challan creation.. Did you get any solution? ...

Cross company code scenario?

Dear Gurus,
I have 2 company codes and in each company code 2 plats are there.
One purchase organization is responsible for all 4 plants.
In customization, i m assigning this purchase org to 2 company codes.
is it okay?
pls suggest..

Hi,
If only one purchasing organization is responsible for all 4 plants, then you need not assign this purchasing organisation to company code.
You can assign this purchasing organization to all four plants.
You can not assign one purchasing organization to two company codes in SAP.
If you assign a purchasing organization to one company code. It will be company code-specific purchasing organization.In your case purchasing organization is not company code specific.
Hope it wil help u.
Deepak.

Cross-company code correspondence

Hello
I am trying to run a cross company code correspondace using F.27.
1) I have flagged my correspondance as cross company.
2) Then I have assigned for correspondence
company B to company A
Company C to company A
3) I have configured my correspondences: print program, sapscript
When I run the F.27, which company code should I enter for a select option A, B and C, A B and C.
SAP rejects companies B and C, message FB614 "Do not select a dependent company code"
And when I run it without any company, I have several statements printed instead of 1.
Any idea ?
Regards

To close the thread...
It seems that customers have to be created however in the main company. Which is not what I want.
The printing program was adapted to cover the case and just produce 1 statement per customer.

Cross company code cost center allocation

Hello experts,
I would like to know if cross company code cost center allocations is possible or not ?
Please let me know.
Newcom

hi its possiable,
can u give a senario, i will explain to u.
for ex:
com code1 having dept x
com code 2 also have a possiablities to have same c ctr dept x
thanqu

CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

Have you considered using this user-exit?
User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
Thanks,
Ben

Changing controlling area from single company code to cross company code

Hi,
Due to my client requirement, in the middle of the year, we need to change the controlling area from being same as company code to cross company code controlling area. Although the currency is same. We are going to create a new company code. Is the changing controlling area settings possible to do? what are the precautions and changes need to be taken?
One more question, we need to change the company code when the new company code is created in the system in Cost Center Masters in the middle of the year. Is this possible after changing controlling area from single company code to cross company code. Right now company code is not appearing in the cost center master.
Thanks & Regards,
Saidarao

Hi,
If both companies having transaction data its not possible,Normally before defining Organisational Strucutre only we have to deside both companies is assigning same controlling are or have to maitain separately for this we have to compare the Fiscal year,Operating chart of accounts ,if both having same then we will assign both the company codes to one controlling area if these two companies having different currencies also its not a problem.When we creating Controlling Area we have to choose option of controlling area as same company code (if one company code one controlling Area) for example if you assigning two companies then we have to use cross company code cost accounting.If u need any further information let me know.
Regards,
Satya

How to activate Compny code validation ( cross company code)

*Hi ,*
*We migrated classic GL to New GL before one month Now*
*I am rollout new company code, after completed all configuration I found uncopmplit configuration of company code validation is not active in controlling area config ( Transaction Code- OKKP) , which is related to cross company code ( Indicator for company code validation )*
*can anybody provide solution to activate company code validation*
Thank ,
Jeetendra

Hi ,
I want to activate company code validation for cross company code still it is inactive
without activation I can not use cross company code for costing
Edited by: jitu konde on Jun 15, 2011 9:38 AM

Cross-company code postings - FI validation

Hi,
We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
1)
IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC rule
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
2)
IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
Please advise what I am missing.

Hi Nitin,
Thank you for your feeback.
I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
For example:
Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
The systen creates two postings:
Posting 1: company code A
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300;
Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
Posting 2: company code B
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
Thank you,
Inna

Cross company code validation in CO Area

Dear All Experts,
I am having one query regarding cross company code validation in CO area. I have ticked Cross company code validation in controlling area, and it is working perfect.
we have total 11 company codes. 10 for US & 1 for Canada. Say 1001 to 1010 US company codes & Canda it is 1101.
The requirement is :-
Now client wants to post cross company code transaction within these 10 US company codes and it should not throw an error ( Ideally which is giving right now ). It should give error only when posting to US company code transaction and Canada Cost Center or Internal Order.
Can we restrict the company code for cross posting validation ? OR Can selected company codes set for validation indicator ?
Experts guidance will be great on this.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Dear,
Murali.
Thanks for your reply.
As you said :- Validation check applies for all the company codes which are assigned to your controlling area.
Means simply we can not apply this option to selective company codes, Right ?
Once it is ticked it is applicable to all company codes.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Cross company code payment - Reallocation of discount

I have a peculiar requirement and I am out of my wits to find a solution. I am confident that our Forum members will give me a solution to this.
The scenarios is like this. There are 122 company codes and there is lot of cross company code payments. Meaning one company code say '0001' pays on behalf of the other 121 company codes. At the time of payment the following enter is passed:
              In the paying company code:
             Debit Inter-company customer
             Credit External Vendor
               In the other company codes:
              Debit Expense (A cost center is assigned to this GL)
              Credit Inter-company Vendor
At the time of payment to the external vendor the following entry is passed:
             Debit External Vendor
             Credit Bank.
So far it is good. But now if the Vendors term allows discount of say 2% then at the time of payment the entry generated is :
               In the paying company code
              Debit External Vendor
              Credit Discount
              Credit Bank
           No entry in the other company codes.
In case the payment term of the vendor allows discount then the client wants the discount to be posted as follows:
                 In the paying company code
              Debit External Vendor
              Credit Inter-company customer
               (in the proportion of each company code's share of expense)
              Credit Bank
                In the other company codes
               Debit Inter-company Vendor
               Credit Expense account (the one which was originally debited)
                                                   (the same cost center should also be credited)
How can this be achieved. I know there is no standard functionality to do this. But can somebody suggest a logic for the Z program.
Thanks in advance.
Kalyan

Guys, be specific in your answers. If you do not know, please refrain from answering.
I am really sorry to state that in this site and also in other similar websites, people just answer questions without knowing what they are talking about.
I can understand, novices asking questions. But the same novices should not try to answer questions which they do not understand.
I am sorry to make these comments. But I want this to be a quality site where Practitioners can come and find real answers to questions. I am sure there will be people out their who will support my viewpoint. This will help make the forum more useful. Otherwise somebody seeking an answer to his/her question may spend hours and end up without an answer.
Kalyan

Cross Company code posting is available for recurring payment setup?

Hi All,
I could not find the cross company code field for recurring payment setup with useing T code FBD1.
Vendor is created in paying company code 1000, however, the rent has be booked to cross company code (1001) cost center (2000).
So, while trying to do recurring payment setup, I could not see the field.
I know the alternative option that i can use the "Cost Center(1000)" is assigned to CoCd 1000 and do recurring setup without useing cross company code, later i can post the manual journal for correction (as below), however, I do not want use this option.
Dr/Cr       CoCd                         GL account            Cost Center           Amount
Dr            1001                         Rent account          2000                      XXXXX
Cr            1000                         Rent account          1000                      XXXXX
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
Ex. you maintained for "RKL     Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567   (with corresponding CO objects)

Problem with STO-cross company code

hi,
I am configuring STO process for cross company code( plants in different company code). I have done all the config. When creating the PO i am entering the supplying plant, i am getting the error "Purchasing organisation xxxx is not responsible for Plant YYYY". Could some one pls. suggest what may be the problem?
Thanks & Regards,
Pathanjali Bhat

Hi Pathanjali,
For cross company STO, the prerequiste is.
1.0 You have to create a customer in SUPPLYING PLANT and assign to RECEIVING PLANT.
ex: for plant:3000, sales org:3000,dist. chanl:12, divn:00.
and assign to plant:1000 in spro sto setting.
( **maintain shipping notification**)
2.0 Create a vendor in receiving plant .
3.0 Here doc type:NB.
4.0 Maintain supl. plant rec. plnt. and doc type in spro.
5.0 Maintain del type: NLCC.
6.0 Maintain supplying plant in vendor master in purchasing tab>extras> add.purchasing details--> maintain supplying plant here.
Create a PO .
enter vendor which u have created.
ex u r procuring for plant 3000.
maintain pur org, cocode 3000, here ( I think u might have done a mistake here).
maintain plant 3000 in item details tab.
enter the matl. price and qty and check the status.
If every thing ok save.
Then
go to VL10B, maintain del. date (should be before than ur delivery date in PO)
press F8.
ur po line item comes.
select the line item press back ground button
one more line item wil comes.
select any line item, press log. u wil get new screen.
place a cursor on that and press doc details button,
system shows the delevery note. make a note of no. come to LT03.
maintain required fields, select back ground processing. and select 2 below that field( ie pick and post) and press enter.
system picks and post the doc.
now check in PO history. 641 mvt has taken or not?
if not do once again LT03.
Rewert back if any clarification.
Reward if useful.
regards
Viru

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for