Document splitting error in cross company code invoice

Hi
I am trying to post an invoice through FB60 which is belong to multiple company code.
while simulating the document, system is not able to find the cost object (profit centre) for vendor line item. following is the detail of the transaction:-
Trasnaction Code - FB60
Vendor (co code 1000) - Cr     10000
Exp       (co code 1000) - Dr               5000
Exp       (co code 2000) - Dr               5000
Customization detail -
Item category for vendor reconciliation a/c -           03000
item cateogry for inter company clearing a/c -        01000
item cateogry for inter company customer a/c -      02000
Business Trasaction for document type (IC) used in FB60 - 0000. In document type IC i have allowed intercompany trnaction.
can anybody revert where i am missing the configuration. what additional i need to do to get out this error.
please revert
Regards
DD

Hello,
I also faced similar problem with posting cross company transacation whereby one of the document containing another Customer/Vendor line item which is not the intercompany clearing account. Both the additional Vendor/Customer and the Intercompany Vendor/Customer line items failed to derive the Profit Center information from the offsetting line items. The system recognize the Customer/Vendor line items (additional and Intercompany clearing) as "Leading Items" instead of derivating.
The journal looks like below.
CoCd A
dr. GL Account        [PC-A]   100
cr. ICT Vendor-B                   (100)   --> successfully deriving the [PC-A] information
CoCd B
dr. ICT Customer-A                  100      --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
cr. Customer                         (100)   --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
dr. GL Account       [PC-B]    100
cr. GL Account       [PC-B]    (100)
The GL Account in CoCd B are registered under Item Category "01000" and it has been registered as the splitting base item for the "ICT Customer-A" and "Cusomer" accounts.
Would really appreciate your kind help or suggestion to solve this issue.
Thanks a lot in adavance!
Regards,
Nurul F

Similar Messages

Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario

Hi
We have the following business scenario:
(Please note : Document splitting with Real time CO-FI integration is active)
1)one company(say, Co.code X) purchases on behalf of another group
company(Co.code Y)
2)the cost center of Co.code Y is given in the 'Account assignment' tab
in the Purchase order created in 'X'.
3)The PO is created in foreign currency
4)So, when the Goods receipt happens, the expense posting is happening
in Co.code Y and the GRIR entry is in X.
5)When the invoice is posted in co.code X, the Vendor Open item (in
foreign currency) gets created in X.
6)The problem occurs when Forex.valuation is done for the Vendor open
item. The Forex.gain/loss is getting posted in Co.code X by deriving
the Cost object from the expense posting in Co.code Y. Now, the system
is giving an error message 'CO object doesnt belong to X co.code'
I beleive this is the way document splitting normally works by deriving
the CO object form the original expense posting onto the subsequent
documents but I guess, it is failing in this scenario. Please let me
know if there is a work around to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ravi

We normally do the independent splitting of documents in respective company codes (This being the limitation mentioned by SAP for cross company code postings).
In the document split configuration, for Define document splitting rule, check for the leading item for cross company code transactions, and check for the item categories to be edited. The following two entries will be there
1100 Company Code Clearing CC = CC of leading item
1100 Company Code Clearing CC <> CC of leading item
In case of independent splitting, remove the first entry and check.
Thanks and Regards,
Mamta Sarda

Cross Company Code Invoice cancellation

Hello All,
I am facing an issue wherein the User wants to Reverse the Cross -company code Invoice. The user is unable to cancel the Invoice because of the Error "Dcoument allready contains cleared Items- reversal not possible. Can you suggest how can we proceed in this case.
Thanks
Nitin

Hi,
One of the vendor item of your CC document line items might have been cleared.
Means after posting of invoice, there must be an payment have been posted, since you cannot reverse invoice first.
If payment is already made, first reverse the payment document using FB08 and then reverse your CC document using FBU8 incase of FI entry, where as if it is an MIRO invoice, use MR8M to reverse the CC invoice document.
This will resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu

Document splitting error in Inter company Trip

Hi,
While trying to post cross company code Trip posting we are getting an
error
u201CGLT2001 Item category 02000 not allowed in accounting transaction
0300/0001u201D.
We have document splitting active.
The following are the steps to recreate the scenario
1)A Travel request is created using T code TRIP
2)An Advance amount is entered
3)An alternate cost centre is specified. This cost centre is
different from that of the employee master and belongs to another
company code as the business process is such that employee travels for
a separate company code
4)When this request is settled and during posting run in PRRW, we are
getting this error of document splitting.
5)The Intercompany posting configuration in FI is done based on the
vendor customer relation ship between the 2 company codes using posting
keys 01 and 31.
6)Document splitting is active in the system.
We are at verge of completing SIT 1 an early reply is much appreciated
Regards
Vikash Surana

Hi
Not sure whether my response will help you or not.
I had faced a similar situation although we did not had Document Splitting and all. Actually the problem is all the cost centres are linked to the profit centres. Again these profit centres are linked to company codes. Now the contradiction comes when an employee divides his cost between two cost centres that are relevant for two different company codes.
Hence the solution that we thought of is assigning all profit centres to all company codes

Cross Company code invoices.

Hi All,
I want to creat a Cross Company code PO based invoices in MIRO.
I have created 2 PO's with the same vendor and differenct company codes.
But in MIRO it is taking only one PO to invoice.
I am not aware of cross company code settings.
Can any one plz provides steps to create the Cross Company code PO Based invoice in MIRO.
Thanks,
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please look at the appropriate functional forum.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 2, 2010 5:56 PM

Hi,
Please contact to your MM consultant. Thanks

How to break the document line items in cross company code document

Hi,
Currently the cross company code posting is summing up all the line items and posting as a single line item as long as the line items are having the same tax code.
The system will break the line items only if there are non-identical tax codes. How can i change this default behaviour to break the line items in all cases?
http://wikisend.com/download/436966/2.zip

It is the standard SAP behaviour to sum up all the identical tax code values.

CK666 error in cross company code cost estimate

Dear All,
We have activated multiple valuations/transfer prices : legal, group and profit center valuations.
We perform cost estimate run in ck40n for profit center valuation and get error
Material 20000035/plant FZ03: Transfer price could not be found.
Message no. CK666
Diagnosis
When switching profit center A ->B (from the material component to the costing object), a transfer price could not be determined for transfer price variant 0 in respect of material 20000035 in plant 1.
System Response
If you carry out costing for a profit center valuation, material 20000035 goes into the cost estimate without a value.
If you create a cost estimate for group valuation, profit from material 20000035 is not transferred into the cost component split.
Procedure
Check the settings for transfer price variant 0.
We have checked this material. Manufacturing plant belongs to company code A.
To get cost estimate for plant 2 which belongs to company code B we use procurement types in material master.
It requires now transfer price variant. But we do not want to use this functionality.
How can we solve this issue?
With best regards,
Kamila.

HI Kamila.
There is a difference in the way PCA handles determining costs:
If transfer prices are activated it's necessary to determine either a transfer price via pricing or to exclude the relevant material
from the transfer prices scenario via user-exit 'EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003'.
Please note that the determination of a transfer price and the creation of additional PCA lines are independent of each other. You cannot control the determination of a transfer price by means of your 0KEK settings. So if you want that no transfer price is used for a material please use exit 'EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003' here. Pricing will then not be called and the system automatically uses the current
material price from the profitcenter view.
Please have a look at the note [458543 |https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000458543]which provides further information regarding this exit.
Regards,Declan

Document Splitting Cross Company Code

Hello
In our company we are using business area for internal reporting. For cross company code transaction we have assigned vendor and customer in the configuration. In the document splitting settings for cross company code transaction we did a setting that every company code should have document splitting separately (Split each document in each company code separately.
In this case there should be only one entry in the splitting rule for the item category to be edited - 01100 CC <> CC of leading item.)
We normally received vendor invoice where expense belong to several company code but invoice belong to one company code.
Example Invoice amount 1200
vendor liability in company code SA02
Expense 200 for company code SA02 and 1000 in company code SA03
When we simulate the document in general ledger view, system create 4 line item in company code SA02 one Expense Dr, Vendor Credit and two line item with zero balance. In two line items system showing no business area. We want system to post only two line item and none of the entries should be without business area
Thanks and best regards

Hi
System is simulating the following entries
C>C                                 PK           Account                                    Amount
SA02     1     000001     31          311001     T/P - 3rd Party                            1,200.00-     SAR                         4449
SA02     2     000002     40          515011     External Persl-NonOR             200.00     SAR                         4449
SA02     3     000003     01          146501     Claims/Bchar,ABB SBA            1,000.00     SAR
SA02          000004     50          999001     BA Clearing A/C                    1,000.00-     SAR
SA02          000005     40          999001     BA Clearing A/C                    1,000.00     SAR                        4449
SA03     1     000001     40          515011     External Persl-NonOR            1,000.00     SAR                       2880
SA03     2     000002     31          326001     Non T/P - ABB SBA                   1,000.00-     SAR                       2880
Now if you see in company code SA02 for receivable form SA03 system is not deriving the business area and in order to balance this entry by BA system is creating zero balance entry
Thanks and Best Rregards

Cross Company code Transaction error

Hi,
When I am posting below Cross company code transaction getting error - Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled.
Vendor A/c - Company code1
To Bank clearing A/c - Company code2
Problem is profit center is not deriving for Vendor reconciliation A/c. We cannot make a default profit center this.
When I am posting cross company code invoice it is correclty deriving the profit center for the same reconciliation a/c.
Also I do not see any mistake in document splitting configuration.
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards
Shanu

Hi
Check the following things:
1. In KE52, the profit center entered in Bank Clearing Account Item in Co Code B is also assigned in Co Code A. Then system will allow you to post the cross co code document
2. Are you using the correct Document Type while posting the transaction. IN your Document Type Definition in OBA7, the check boxes for Inter Co posting and Trading Partner (Trading Partner only if inter co elimination is being used) have been ticked
3. You have assigned the correct item category to vendor reconcilliation account (Should be Vendor GL), Inter co Clearing account (Balance sheet Account ) and Bank Clearing account (balance sheet) have been assigned in your configuration
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
<a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">sai baba wallpaper</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>

FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)

Hi expert,
I am going to reverse a document (after resetting through LSMW,useing -F.80 as for mass reversal) and getting a error massage below(this document has been generated after F110)
FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)
Please advise me how can I reverse this document and also advise me what does it mean,
Will it be done by FBU8? (But when I am using it,showing two documents what does it mean and advise should I select both document for reversal)
Please advise
Thanks & Regards

Hi
Thanks for your quick advise,
I am trying to do that through FBU8 but I am getting there two documents numbere inside for reversal (it contained two documents)
Should I reverse both documents or I should select one one only
Please advise why it is showing two documents inside
Thanks & Regards

While doing cross company code postings I get an error

Hi experts,
I have an issue on cross company code postings through FB60. There is a vendor account which has been extended to both company codes. The amount of invoice is Rs.10000 of which 6000 to be accounted in company code 1000 and 4000 in company code 5000. When this is done we get an error 'A unique company code has not been assigned to company number A001'.
After trying several options, I have found one solution. In the test system I Went to classify FI document types for document splitting, against document type KR transaction 0300 (Vendor invoice) was there. I changed to 0000 (unspecified posting). Once this was done, I was able to post cross company transactions without any problem.
I would like to know as to what would be the impact? Would this change create any other issue?
I request you to give your expert opinion on this.
Regards,
Ramkumar B.
Duplicate thread, therefore it will be locked, please avoid creating different threads for the same subject.
check the responses in thread While doing cross company code postings I get an error
FI Moderator

Dear,
When you are posting vendor Invoice through FB60 then system creates accounting document "KR" and when document splitting is activated in system the you have to assign Doc type KR to Transaction 0300 and 0001.
This is standard requirement. There will not be any changes by doing this.
Hope it is clear..
Br,Vivek

Cross-Company code posting Error

Hi Experts,
When I am trying to Post an intercompany transaction facing an error "A unique company code has not been assigned to company number XXXX"
Scenario:
1. Company code 1 debit
2. company code 2 credit
In simulation I can see the line items as below
Cocd PK    GL Acct     Amount
IN01   40     1                100           Expense acct
IN02   50     2                100           Expense Acct
IN02   40     3                100          Inter comp clerg acct
IN01   50     4                100         Inter Comp Clerg Acct.
but still above said error message is pops up:
rgd
YJ

Hai Ravi,
Thanks for the link,
From the document split settings i can able to post an Inter-co document and that is : Expense of company code 1 to Expense of Company Code2. But In case of Vendor invoice (F-43) - Liability for Comp code 1 and Expense for Comp Code 2. In vendor case scenario I am still facing the same error.
My doubt on this error is how the line item of Comp code 1 can derive the profit Center (PC1) information when entry is as below:
Trnsct      Compcode       Amt           Profit Center
Vendor          1               10000
Expesne        2               10000         PC2
Your suggestion or assistance on this is highly appreciated.
rgd
YJ

Cross company code transaction error in F-48

Dear all
I have a problem in cross company code posting. I have done all the settings like company codes are assigned to company(OX16) and i maintained gl accounts in OBYA also. When i am trying to post cross company code posting i am getting the error:
A unique company code has not been assigned to company number XXXXXX
Message no. GLT0001
Diagnosis
Document breakdown is active in your system. In certain cases, a company code is derived from the company ID number, and this must lead to the assignment of a unique company code.
A unique company code could not be assigned to company number XXXXXX.
System Response
You cannot carry out the required posting.
Procedure
Assign one company code to company number XXXXXX.
Please tel me wt setting i have to do in system.
Thanks in advance
Thanks and Regards
Girish.

Hi Chandra,
Thanks for your information.
I tried in OB60 BUT still same error i am facing. we have activated document splitting .IF document splitting is deactivated then its working fine ,When document splitting is activated then we have facing this error,
If any notes or any setting please guide me.
Thanks and Regards
Girish

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Cross company code error in posting due to retro

Hi,
We have a scenario where a backdated change was made to move an employee accross company codes. During payroll posting into finance, we recieve the following error:
Required field GL_ACCOUNT was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTGL
This is in 2 documents, one fordebiting the old company code and another document to credit the new one. In both cases we recieve this error for the amount being moved in between the 2. So it sees like the system can't handle this scenario.

Hi Hitesh,
The error may get resolved using the following steps:
1. Create a business partner in the role billing unit (Tcode BP)
2. Assign this billing unit to company code.
3. Assign billing unit to sales organization.
Customer Relationship Management ->Master Data ->
Organizational Management -> Cross-System Assignment of Organizational Units -> Assign Billing Units to Sales Organizations
This should resolve ur issue.
Regards,
Shalini Chauhan

Document splitting error in cross company code invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for