CKMLCP-Revaluate consumption-----urgent

Dear all,
I performed revaluate consumption for certain material, however,system did not give me any error/warning or information message, this material's status still keep in 'single-level settlement', would anyone tell me what is the possible problem?
thanks,
Ben

Hi Quang,
a transfer posting is usually a multi-level consumption, enabling that the price differences will be sent to the receiver during multi-level closing. If you have them in COC is probably due to the fact that you do not close the receiving company code in the same costing run. You might consider to change that.
The other possibility is to use in the IMG the configuation of the material update structure to switch the certain process category from multi-level to single level
from IMG docu:
Define Material Update Structure
In this section, you can define a material update structure.
During the material ledger update, the system collects data from valuation-relevant transactions such as goods receipts, invoice receipts, and settlement of production orders. This data is collected in different categories in the material ledger in accordance with the material update structure.
The influence that these transactions have on the valuation price upon material price determination depends on the category to which they were assigned. The following categories are available:
Receipts
Consumption
Other Receipts/Consumption
Please explore the possibilities you have there and have a look at the respective notes in the application area CO-PC-ACT
Best regards,
Udo

Similar Messages

CKMLCP - Post closing issue

Hello Experts,
CKMLCP has been run and in Post closing step, we received errors that some of the materials have been locked by certain users (Processing completed with errors).This run took about 2 hours to complete.
After that we rerun the Post closing step and the Post closing was successfully completed without errors.This run was completed in 30 mins.
During the first run of the Post closing, we found out that the Revaluate consumption and CO account assignment was not ticked.
But, in the second costing run both the parameters were ticked (Revaluate consumption and CO account assignment)
My queries are whether in the first Post closing documents are posted or no documents posted as the posting was completed with errors?
If some documents have been posted then do I need to reverse that post closing run as I had not selected the Revaluate consumption and CO account assignment parameter?
Or if no documents are posted in the first post closing run, whether all documents are correctly posted in the second post closing run (as both the parameters i,e Revaluate consumption and CO account assignment) have been selected.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards,
WNR

Hi,
Thanks for the response.
The problem is that, for this material, the costing run shows now the correct valuation category ZE11 in the costing run result (but in pending status for the material), but the log shows the error message refering the old valuation category ZE09.
The obyc must not to be mantained because, for the valuation category ZE09, only operation PRY should be possible (this has the correct account determination), not operation PRV. The error refers old valuation category ZE09, operation PRV.
Thanks!

ML Closing via CKMLCP - Open material & Maximum FI Item reached

Hi Experts,
when i did ML closing via transaction code CKMLCP, i found some problems:
1, for some materials such as A, Multi price determination can not be completed.
2, for some materials such as B, Revaluation of consumption can not be completed.
3, for some materials such as C, Posting closing entry failed.
I don't know under which situation these error would happen (in other words, it's WHY), and how to solve them ( solutions).
and, for posting closing entry, one error message is "Maximum number of FI items reached" with message no F5 727. what is the soluton to this issue?
could you please kindly give me some hints or suggestions?
Thanks&Regards,
Felix Shi

Thank you sir.
Maximum Item issue was solved owe to your solution.
I still have two materials open in Revaluation of consumption section in CKMLCP. the error message is :
Material 320003277 is blocked in valuation area 7080
Message no. CKMLVNB051
Diagnosis
You are trying to revaluate consumption for material 320003277 (with movement type ). This material is blocked.
System Response
Consumption for this material will not be revaluated.
Please kindly teams help me with this issue!!!
Many thanks in advance!
Regards,
Felix Shi

Closing Entry Run without "Revaluation of Consumption Checkbox"

Hi gurus,
I have a very important problem and I need to close the period as soon as possible.
I did closing entry run for an individual material without the Revaluation of Consumption checkbox. CO object revaluation is active for the consumption alternatives (Both for CO and FI revaluation). We see normal postings (with checbox filled) with profitability (CO-PA) object.
What are the postings that ML did in both FI side and CO side. When I looked at the posting price differences are distributed for each single profitability(CO-PA) object in CKM3 view. Also related amount sent to ending inventory (both in CKM3 view and with FI stock account postings).
Under this conditions, COGS account are posted still with standard price rather then actual price. Am I right. So, for the correct result, should we post the related amount (actual - std price difference X sold amount) to the COGS account?
On the other hand, how will be the CO-PA posting at the end of the period. As you know the actual prices are taken from ML and COGS accounts are posted with standard prices. Therefore, CO-PA COGS amount will not be actual amount. Am I right.
Thanks in advance.
Ahmet

Hi,
I mean system has two different kind of postings, one of that is FI posting (legal) and the other is CO posting with cost elements (statistical like cost allocations). I run the step Consumption revaluation in CKMLCP and price differences distributed in CKM3 view. But as you know that actual postings are done in the closing entry step and I do not check the box of revaluate consumption in the closing entry parameters, actually price differences are not posted to consumptions rather CKM3 view changed.
Therefore, COGS account posted with srtandart prices rather than actual prices because we did not checked the "revaluate consumption box". In order to fix the situation (actual-standart differences) should we post the related price difference amount to the COGS account.
Ahmet

Error in denesting activity for the luggage trading items.

Hello experts,
This has reference to the Denesting activity for the luggage trading items in SAP. There has been an error in the basic configuration for this activity, as the denested stock is being incorrectly valued & consequently a wrong impact is being posted to the P&L. The actual landed cost for the nested item is not flowing to the denested items.
We have been correcting this manually till now through an FI JV. However we need to correct the system urgently as this has a serious implication & the impact is considerably high. E
Procedure for De-nesting:
The procedure for De-nesting is being carried out at BLL location & at branches. Transaction code used for the same is MB1A. Two separate documents are prepared for de-nesting.
In MB1A, first document is being entered for Movement type 201 for depleting Nested item stock (Ref doc no 65489076) & subsequent document entered for movement type 202 for creating de-nested item stock (Ref doc no 6548769659).
The MAP for Nested Item is correctly being updated with each receipt through Mov Type 101. However the MAP for denested item codes is not being updated since the stock creation is through mov type 202. The Old MAP updated at the time of code creation remains stagnant. Thus the denested items are being valuated with an old MAP rate.
In normal condition, the value of both 201 & 202 should match. As a result, the gap between the two kept on increasing & the inventory gets overvalued. The entries are posted to 8765987 (Consum-Intrnl-TMu2013 Dom) GL or 8765988 (Consum-Intrnl-TM-Imp) GL.
Reference Accounting doc no 3025689745 & 1589645896 for above referred material docs.
Please advice on this issue
Thanks,
Ratnam

Activating ML is necessary because in my customer's company sell goods at planed price then revaluate value of inventories and COGS at actual price in the end of each of period. So we decide to use standard price control for trading goods and active Material ledger.
end of period, we run period procedure of ML for trading goods, we expect allocation different amount, revaluate inventories and consumption. Run revaluation step of costing run in ML, we revaluate all ending inventories and consumption transaction except billing transaction. So, we think that we need to run Ke27 to revaluate all line item document in COPA from billing.
so anybody to help me revaluate consumption amount from billing at actual price in end of period?
thanks in advance!

CKMLCPAVR there is no any process steps in Processing tab

Hi,
I would like to execute CKMLCPAVR. My SAP version is ECC6.3 and no this transaction in menu tree but I still can type the transaction code to execute it.
My problem is that there is no any process steps show out in Processing tab after I gave the plant and settings.
I can't execute these steps such as CKMLCP, My posting period is 10/2011, and initial period is 01/2011.
Could you tell me my version is too old? So the CKMLCPAVR can't work, or not?
thank you very much.

I have activated the EA-FIN and CKMLCPAVR has been shown up at menu tree but the process steps are still empty.
I choosed the posting period 10/2011 and initial period 01/2011 and checked Posting Run, Revaluate Consumption, Relevant for Costing, Provisional Price = L price for the last cumulation period, Price = Actual price for the period, Legal = 0.
After I set up all these parameter, I turned to the Process Tab and found there is no any prcess steps in this tab.
Do you know what happen?

Cost of price difference and cost of goods sold

Dear All,
I got the explanation from forum :
The price variance differences are posted per purchased item which are used in making the material to be sold. this difference rolls to the COS line, but not the COGS account.
May I know what is the difference of cost of goods sold and cost of sales. Both also cost, cost of goods sold is inventory turned to cost upon goods sold whereas cost of sales, to me, can be indirect cost.
Any help to further explain of COS in relation to price variance?
Thanks

Hi
In SAP there is a concept of COGS, but there is no concept of COS.. COS is more of a accounting terminology,... There are different schools of thought on COS/... Some companies treat COS = COGS + Selling overhead...
With Material Ledger, the variances of components purchased can be rolled up to the Header Material which consumes them.... If this header mat is consumed in further processes, the consumption can also be revaluated.... Going So on and so forth, you can also revaluate the COGS of the final material....
Simply said, when variances are rolled up, you can revaluate the inventory... If the inventory is consumed before revaluation, then you can revaluate Consumption / COGS....
Hope this helps
Regards
Ajay M

Material Ledger,Revaluation Production Cost Center ,Standard Cost

Hi, I have a problem with revaluation of production cost centers.
Firstly, production cost center expenses are settled via activity types onto the production order at the end of the period. However, CKMLCP revaluate cost centers after the settlement because of using standard price. So cost centers at the end of the period have some amount.
As a result we can not find actual price for production orders.
If I use standard cost in order to consume on cost centers, material ledger revaluates again this cost centers. I dont want this condition. Because this cost center is settled to other cost object before closing.
Thanks.
Message was edited by:
Ergul Taslacioglu

Hi
Go to the following path in SPRO:
Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Actual Costing/Material Ledger -> Actual Costing -> Activate Actual Costing. Double-click on "Actiavte Actual Costing" and change the indicator from "2" to "1".

Use an alternative Exchange Rate Type for activity actual price

Dear All,
I try to use an alternative Exchange Rate (not M) in controlling area version "0", I need to use a custom currency exchange rate like in planned price (here I create a new planned version with exchange rate "N").
I find same notes and it seems that standard Sap use only Exchange Rate "M" for actual price but I notice that for example in transaction KB21N (activity allocation) system shows in additional info exchange rate "N" (input in version "0").
Is not possibile to use other Exchange Rate for actual price, activity allocation, for confirmed activity in production order?
Controlling area has currency type 30 (group currency EUR), this company has MXN.
Thanks in advance for your support
Daria

In KB21N (activity allocation), system uses the exchange rate type you have maintained in controlling area version plan settings (transaction OKEQN). Activity allocation during the month always happen at the planned price maintained in KP26 at the exchange rate specified in plan version. During actual price calculation and revaluation during month end, it calculates actual activity price at (uses M rate to convert to controlling area currency) and revaluates consumption.
I think you cannot use other exchange rate, see the coding in include LKSPIF00 that is used in KSII where currency type is hard coded to M, if this is plan price calculation it's picking tka07-kurst.
Best Regards,
Venkata Ganesh Perumalla

Error in KE27 - run for trading goods

Dear gurus!
i have a error when i run KE27.
Current, my customer don't have production activity. In SAP system, we activated Material Ledger. in period, i wanna run Periodic valuation (KE27) for all trading goods. (Note that we don't have finished good because not have production, customer just sell trading goods)
I configured some steps follow:
1. Define and Assign Valuation Strategy (in this step, i wonder that which valuation strategy is user for valuation for trading goods)
- valuation trategy : 001
- sequence     material costing       quantity field
       10                        x                            VV099
- assignment of valuation strategy
point of valuation                   record type              valuation strategy
    02                                              F                               001
2. Define Access to Actual Costing/Material Ledger
   Costing key - 01
0 legal valuation
1. only trasfer total cost
   periodic a/c line item
3. Assign Costing Keys to Material Types
point of valuation           record type    Material type        Valid to         costing key 1
        02                                   F                 HAWA              31.12.9999       01
Then, after run period closing in Material ledger, i run KE27 to periodic valuation , but system get error:
" Message no. KE435 - Costing key 01 does not exist
In Profitability Analysis, the system tried to valuate by reading a product cost estimate. The Customizing settings in CO-PA call for valuation using costing key 01.
This costing key is not defined "
explicitly, i maintained costing key and assigned this to trading goods - material type.
Please, help to fix it!
any idea is appreciated.

Activating ML is necessary because in my customer's company sell goods at planed price then revaluate value of inventories and COGS at actual price in the end of each of period. So we decide to use standard price control for trading goods and active Material ledger.
end of period, we run period procedure of ML for trading goods, we expect allocation different amount, revaluate inventories and consumption. Run revaluation step of costing run in ML, we revaluate all   ending inventories and consumption transaction except billing transaction. So, we think that we need to run Ke27 to revaluate all line item document in COPA from billing.
so anybody to help me revaluate consumption amount from billing at actual price in end of period?
thanks in advance!

Alternative Valuation Run

Hi Sap Experts,
In one of our companies, we have decided to use alternative valuation run (CKMLCPAVR) in order to handle the differences between IFRS requirements and Local Requirements. I have two questions:
1-) What is the customization steps of alternative valuation run in order?
2-) Do we need to create a new costing variant for alternative valuatiıon run?
Thanks In advance,
Burak

Dear all,
We have made a test to monitor the postings of AVR. THe following steps has been launched in order.
1-     All actual data for the period has been copied to the plan version *** via t-code KP98.
2-     The report S_ALR_87013611 u2013 Cost centers:Actual/Plan/Variance has been executed in order to compare the actual version (0) with plan version (***). It is seen as equal.
3-     IFRS-Local delta adjusments made on local ledger is from FI reports and these posting has been made in version *** by transaction KP06. For testing, only depreciation cost element in one of the production cost center increased by 10,000 EUR.
4-     Plan splitting (KSS4) has been executed.
5-     Plan price calculation has been executed.
6-     KSBT report for plan prices in each cost center/activity type has been checked. The only difference between the version 0 and *** is in the cost center where manual data updated in step 3.
7-     The report S_ALR_87013611 u2013 Cost centers:Actual/Plan/Variance has been executed and checked again in order to see the balance for all production cost center is 0 and splitting-plan price calculation is succesful. It has been seen that the balance of the cost center where manual data updated in step 3 is 0 and difference in depreciaton cot element has flowed to depreciation activity succesfully. In short, there is a 10,000 EUR balance between version 0 and *** in depreciation cost element (secondary).
8-     Alternavite Valuation Run (CKMLCPAVR) has been launched. Settings in AVR is stated below:
Posting run:selected
Revaluate consumption:selected
Relevant for costing:selected
Credit cost center: Inactive for selection (I will mention this below)
Acc. modification:blank
Accounting principle: ZTR (Local posting to local ledger) which is assigned to Local ledger in New ledger from customizing.
Provisional price:Price for the last cumulation period
Price:Plan price for the period
Price for Cumulation in Legal Valuation:***
Valuation alternative:Blank
Exch.rate diff:Cumulate exchange rate differences normally
After AVR closing document posted, we have realized that there is no posting related to data entered in KP06. The only posting is 0,01 EUR in one cost element where rounding difference occured during copying actual to plan.
What can be the reason why was planning data not taken into account during delta posting? It seems that AVR doesnu2019t take updates in planning data change in KP06 in version ***.
Now, in the customizing step of activate actual costing step, u201CUpdate of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structureu201D is 0 and u201CControl of Cost Center Creditu201D is blank as it seems below. Although, I changed these selections to 2 and 1, the u201Ccredit cost centeru201D box hasnu2019t turned into active.
Can the problem of planning data be related to u201Ccredit cost centeru201D selection in settings tab in AVR? If it is, how can it be activated?
Best regards
Burak Gedikoğlu
SAP CO Consultant

Alternative valuation run AVR and "Following run"

Hello,
We are using the Material Ledger (Alternative valuation run AVR) with multiple periods, in the "settings " tab we flagged
- "Posting run"
- "Revaluate Consumption"
- "Relevant for costing".
We would like to use the new costing run as "Following run" (ie we created the costing run for the period 01-2011 (January 2011) starting from the costing run of the period 12-2010 (December 2010); the costing run covers the period 01-2011).
A month later, we would like to create a cumulated costing run for the two periods 01 and 02 (January and February 2011); the correct way is to create the costing run for the period 02-2011 (February 2011) starting from the costing run of the period 12-2010 (December 2010)?
In this way we have
- Initial period '01-2011 '
- Period '02-2011 '. (following run of 12-2010 (December 2010).
A month later again, we would like to create a cumulated costing run for the three periods 01 to 03 (January , February and March 2011); the correct way is to create the costing run for the period 03-2011 (March 2011) starting from the costing run of the period 12-2010 (December 2010)?
In this way we have
- Initial period '01-2011 '
- Period '03-2011 '. (following run of 12-2010 (December 2010).
Is it this the correct way to use the "Following run" functionality?
Are There other ways to use the "Following run"?
Could you please indicates u201Chow tou201D documentation or other documentation?
Thanks in advance.
Mario

Hi Gianmario,
I need to run Alternative valuation starting from the alternative of the last period.
For example: we want to create AVR for the period 01-2015 starting from the alternative of 12-2014 (because my user want to take value and inventory from the last alternative that he run in December)
So :
In January
1)      initial period 01-2015
2)      Period 01-2015
3)      Following run 12-2014
In February
1)      initial period 01-2015
2)      Period 02-2015
3)      Following run 12-2014
And so on…
I need to understand if this is the correct method to use “following run” because I don’t found material or documentation on this aspect, but I found only your post.
So have you found material/Documentation of this aspect? Or if you use “following run” in this mode have you found problems?
Thanks in advance
Claudia

Revaluation of cosnumptiojn option in ML - missing

Hi All,
We have activated ML option, but when we sekect CJMKCP,
sysetm is not displaying the option "Revaluation of consumption" option & also in closinh stock entry system is not displaying the "revaluate consumption".
Can any one help us on the same?
Rgds
SMK Ganesh

Hi,
Please ensure the following extension activated in SPRO (to activate pl. take take the assistance thru' BASIS team):
1. Available as a first node "Activate Business Functions". Run the process,
2. Enable the "EA-FIN" function under "Enterprise Extensions".
Pl. check for the re-valuation option.
Rgds
SMK Ganesh

Plan v/s actual materail consumption report for production order - urgent

Dear all Hi,
Is there any report or T code from which i can get the plan v/s actual material consumption for a production order or wbs element after completion of order, please suggest / help, the requirement is very urgent.
thanks in advance

Hi shaiz,
You can get that in COOIS tcode
Select components again List
then give the plant,Order details
execute
You can find 2 fields reqmn qty(nothing but planned) & qty Withdrawn(Actual consumption) in the report
Hope this hepls
Rgds,
SVP

Material consumption report for sales made artcle wise - help urgent

Hi Folks,
My client need a report which consist of
The raw material consumption report
1. Article wise (material group)
2. QTY
3. Value
4. or all sales made for foreign customers
5. Business area
Please help me
Thanks
Narasim

Hi,
Check COOIS report.
It will show the consumption order wise just filter Movement type 261.
Regards,
Shayam

CKMLCP-Revaluate consumption-----urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for