Clarification on a FDA form.

Hi All,
we have a FDA forms that needs to fill out. In particular FDA 2253 PDF template. we are trying to Map Form Fields in a BI Publisher report. The FDA forms are Adobe 7.0 compatible while BI Publisher is only compatible with up to Version 5. Now normally we could save an Adobe PDF in an earlier version, but these templates are password protected by the FDA so we are not able to use this in BI Publisher.
Any assistance on the way to automates the process or how to fill out and submit the forms would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ram

Hi Ram
I can not even open it with v7 it complains about some encryption library. Can you mail the form you have?
thanks
Tim

Similar Messages

Need clarification on contact center form

Hi All,
I was using one particular contract number for my search criteria,then i went to install base tab to see all the item instances,however i could not see them so i changed the account number from the LOV and now i can view the results in install based tab,now my question is how for one customer is having 2 or more accounts and how one account is defaulted when i searched for contract.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
You can and should backup your data from the applications. If you have a backup you can always recover the lost information.
Address Book> File> Export> Address Book Archive
iCal> File> Backup iCal.
The Merge option will appear after hitting Apply in iTunes, when you do the first sync.
This article provides more information on what can and cannot be synced and merged.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1296
Jason

Adobe form-Able to post data using Adobe Reader 9 but not with Adobe Proff

Hello Guru's
I am facing one problem with adobe forms.
We have develoed a adobe form using adobe reader 9.
Now when user are posting the purchase requistion using the form,they are able to post the data using
Adobe Reader 9 but not with Adobe Reader professional.
Can anyone please advice me what can be the problem here.

Adobe Reader 9 can't save the old FDA forms. FDA must update their forms.

Form save works in Adobe Reader 8 but not in Adobe Reader 9

We have an FDA form that customers fill out and save in Adobe Reader. The form worked perfectly with Reader 8, but we are seeing the following Adobe Reader error with Reader 9:
"This document enables Reader capabilities that are no longer in this Reader version."
Also, in Reader 8, the purple bar at the top reads:
"Please fill out the following form. You can save data typed into this form."
However, in Reader 9, the purple bar reads:
"Please fill out the following form. You cannot save data typed into this form.
Please print the completed form if you would like a copy for your records."
The same PDF form was used for both readers.
Does anyone have any ideas? Did Adobe really disable this capability in Reader 9? Their website states you can save forms with Reader 9.

Adobe Reader 9 can't save the old FDA forms. FDA must update their forms.

Xfdf and pdf works in Adobe Reader 6, but not with new versions 7, 8, X

I have a xfdf file which is created by querying a SQL data base and contains data for a pdf form; it works with Adobe Reader 6, but does not work with new versions of Adobe Readers (7, 8, 9 and X).
It is an intranet site running IIS 6.0 in Windows Server 2003 Web Edition SP2 with Adobe 6 installed and client systems include XPSP2, XPSP3, Vista, Windows 7 with different versions of IE, Firefox.
With new versions of Adobe Reader, click on the hyperlink launched the pdf form in a browser window without data; below is the link:
        // create shipping slip hyperlink
        string strLtrSlipUrl = "~/Archive/LtrShipSlip.pdf#FDF=" + lblWO.Text + "LtrShipSlip" + ".xfdf";
        HyperLink hlLtrShipPdf = new HyperLink();
        hlLtrShipPdf.Text = "Ltr Shipping Slip";
        hlLtrShipPdf.NavigateUrl = strLtrSlipUrl;
        hlLtrShipPdf.Target = "_blank";
        pnlLtrShipSlip.Controls.Add(hlLtrShipPdf);
I have installed new versions of Adobe Reader in the Web server (to match what the clients are using), but results are the same – blank pdf.
I uninstalled the new versions and installed version 6 and the pdf and xfdf worked happily together, but we need new versions of Adobe Reader in the client computers.
Thanks for helps and suggestions – I have read articles about using iTextSharp to create pdf documents from .NET apps, but that would be my last choice.

Adobe Reader 9 can't save the old FDA forms. FDA must update their forms.

PDF pagination works find in Reader 8, but failed in lower version 7.

Hi, All
Here's my situation
One dynamic PDF form:
Contents in subforms are flowed layout. And for every section (e.g. Chapter 1, Chapter 2 etc) in pdf, create "New Page" to make sure that they start their contents in seperate new pages, not following the previous flowed content.
The pagination for Flowed content in subforms works ok.
But the pagination for "New Page" only works in Reader 8 and failed in lower version 7.
Any clues?
Thanks
Alan Ji

Adobe Reader 9 can't save the old FDA forms. FDA must update their forms.

OAUG Responds to Oracle Proposal

An Open Letter to Mark Jarvis and Ron Wohl
Mark, Ron
Thank you for setting out your proposal to the OAUG on AppsNet. It was useful to see it in writing, although, as you mentioned, it is largely similar to what was proposed and presented to our membership a year ago. As we had a teleconference a few hours before publication it would have been useful to have been given some advance notice of your plan to publish.
However as this has occurred I would like to clear up some errors and omissions in the document.
1. You state that the OAUG would select 100% of the user papers. You omit to mention that would represent 25% of the total conference content, and that 75% would therefore not be user papers (as explained to us in the conference call at 9am PST yesterday, Wednesday 23 May).
2. You state that no proposals were ever put forward by the OAUG board. In the 23 May conference call, just hours before your AppsNet posting, we had proposed that if you were able to support a Fall North American OAUG conference, we would be willing to collaborate with you in line with your proposals for the Spring in North America as well as in Europe and Asia Pacific.
3. You state that you would be required to take 200 developers out of development for a week of OAUG, and before you know it we would have 400 Oracle employees engaged in each conference. Perhaps you had forgotten that a few hours earlier we had indicated that the level of support that we were requesting for the Fall conference was development staff to cover 55 sessions. Given that the next two Fall OAUG events are on the West Coast, even with travel and preparation time this represents about 120 people days, rather than the 2800 employee weeks that you refer to.
4. Twice you state that there are going to be seven conferences in the next twelve months, and refer to four OAUG conferences. When you asked on the conference call if we would participate with you in Europe, we said yes, we would. When you asked where our venue was for Europe next year, we told you that in light of the current situation we had released it. When we discussed Asia Pacific we told you that we intended to hold our conference in Sydney, but that we did not believe that it would affect your conference in Singapore which is several months and several thousand miles away. We agreed that we would be willing to discuss the model in Asia Pacific with you, as you had indicated the possibility of an alternative style event. We were not clear how that would work. In addition, given our willingness to discuss the North American model, you were well aware that seven conferences in the next twelve months was most unlikely.
5. You stated that for the past five years a majority of Oracle employees attending and staffing OAUG conferences were required to pay full attendance. I dont propose to count, but for the record, approximately sixty were free, any Oracle presenters above the sixty were free, and the conference workers paid a reduced rate to cover the costs involved, such as food. Any others who decided to attend did indeed have to pay.
It is hard for us to understand why it has been so difficult to bring this issue to closure. The OAUG Board understands that once Oracle had committed to its AppsWorld events for Spring 2001 that you were too busy to meet with us to discuss a longer term resolution, for example when we proposed a meeting with you in January. It was unfortunate that you were unable to meet the target date of meeting in March after your conference. We were pleased that we finally met on 30 April, and that we appeared to be making some progress in identifying issues and seeking to resolve them. It was disappointing that you had to postpone the agreed follow up meeting from the first week in May to 23 May, and that only then were you able to inform us that you had a deadline for just a week later.
We had sought to avoid going into details on the discussions in public, as we felt that might jeopardise progress. I am not clear what your purpose was in doing so. We continue to be disappointed by Oracles inability to compromise, and that after all of this time, this proposal so closely resembles the original proposal made last year. I would like to make quite clear what the OAUG has offered, and the flexibility that we have shown in being willing to move from the existing, successful model, to try to accommodate your valid needs to reach a wider audience.
The OAUG has proposed that :
7 The OAUG would be willing to collaborate with Oracle on their AppsWorld events in North America, if in return Oracle would participate in the OAUGs independent Fall North American conference to the extent of approximately sixty development staff.
7 The OAUG, in line with the majority of feedback received from European users, would be willing to collaborate with Oracle on their AppsWorld event in Europe.
7 The OAUG, after the Sydney Asia Pacific event which we have committed to in 2001, would be willing to collaborate with Oracle in their AppsWorld event in Asia Pacific, subject to clarification as to the form of that event.
I believe that is a more than reasonable proposal.
Given that Oracle decided to move these discussions into the public arena, that they did so in such an extensive way just a few hours after a discussion with the OAUG, and without giving any advance warning, I am forced to wonder whether Oracle are really negotiating in good faith in this matter
The OAUG has always stood for the independent voice of the user community. We have received consistent and clear feedback from our members that they wish have a forum for education and feedback which is, and can clearly be seen to be, independent from the Oracle message. We recognise Oracles marketing needs, and believe that our proposed compromise meets those needs, and the stated needs of existing users. If Oracle really had the interests of the users at heart it would not behave in this way. However such behaviour by Oracle only goes to reinforce the importance and value of a truly independent users group.
Jeremy Young
OAUG President
null

An Open Letter to Mark Jarvis and Ron Wohl
Mark, Ron
Thank you for setting out your proposal to the OAUG on AppsNet. It was useful to see it in writing, although, as you mentioned, it is largely similar to what was proposed and presented to our membership a year ago. As we had a teleconference a few hours before publication it would have been useful to have been given some advance notice of your plan to publish.
However as this has occurred I would like to clear up some errors and omissions in the document.
1. You state that the OAUG would select 100% of the user papers. You omit to mention that would represent 25% of the total conference content, and that 75% would therefore not be user papers (as explained to us in the conference call at 9am PST yesterday, Wednesday 23 May).
2. You state that no proposals were ever put forward by the OAUG board. In the 23 May conference call, just hours before your AppsNet posting, we had proposed that if you were able to support a Fall North American OAUG conference, we would be willing to collaborate with you in line with your proposals for the Spring in North America as well as in Europe and Asia Pacific.
3. You state that you would be required to take 200 developers out of development for a week of OAUG, and before you know it we would have 400 Oracle employees engaged in each conference. Perhaps you had forgotten that a few hours earlier we had indicated that the level of support that we were requesting for the Fall conference was development staff to cover 55 sessions. Given that the next two Fall OAUG events are on the West Coast, even with travel and preparation time this represents about 120 people days, rather than the 2800 employee weeks that you refer to.
4. Twice you state that there are going to be seven conferences in the next twelve months, and refer to four OAUG conferences. When you asked on the conference call if we would participate with you in Europe, we said yes, we would. When you asked where our venue was for Europe next year, we told you that in light of the current situation we had released it. When we discussed Asia Pacific we told you that we intended to hold our conference in Sydney, but that we did not believe that it would affect your conference in Singapore which is several months and several thousand miles away. We agreed that we would be willing to discuss the model in Asia Pacific with you, as you had indicated the possibility of an alternative style event. We were not clear how that would work. In addition, given our willingness to discuss the North American model, you were well aware that seven conferences in the next twelve months was most unlikely.
5. You stated that for the past five years a majority of Oracle employees attending and staffing OAUG conferences were required to pay full attendance. I dont propose to count, but for the record, approximately sixty were free, any Oracle presenters above the sixty were free, and the conference workers paid a reduced rate to cover the costs involved, such as food. Any others who decided to attend did indeed have to pay.
It is hard for us to understand why it has been so difficult to bring this issue to closure. The OAUG Board understands that once Oracle had committed to its AppsWorld events for Spring 2001 that you were too busy to meet with us to discuss a longer term resolution, for example when we proposed a meeting with you in January. It was unfortunate that you were unable to meet the target date of meeting in March after your conference. We were pleased that we finally met on 30 April, and that we appeared to be making some progress in identifying issues and seeking to resolve them. It was disappointing that you had to postpone the agreed follow up meeting from the first week in May to 23 May, and that only then were you able to inform us that you had a deadline for just a week later.
We had sought to avoid going into details on the discussions in public, as we felt that might jeopardise progress. I am not clear what your purpose was in doing so. We continue to be disappointed by Oracles inability to compromise, and that after all of this time, this proposal so closely resembles the original proposal made last year. I would like to make quite clear what the OAUG has offered, and the flexibility that we have shown in being willing to move from the existing, successful model, to try to accommodate your valid needs to reach a wider audience.
The OAUG has proposed that :
7 The OAUG would be willing to collaborate with Oracle on their AppsWorld events in North America, if in return Oracle would participate in the OAUGs independent Fall North American conference to the extent of approximately sixty development staff.
7 The OAUG, in line with the majority of feedback received from European users, would be willing to collaborate with Oracle on their AppsWorld event in Europe.
7 The OAUG, after the Sydney Asia Pacific event which we have committed to in 2001, would be willing to collaborate with Oracle in their AppsWorld event in Asia Pacific, subject to clarification as to the form of that event.
I believe that is a more than reasonable proposal.
Given that Oracle decided to move these discussions into the public arena, that they did so in such an extensive way just a few hours after a discussion with the OAUG, and without giving any advance warning, I am forced to wonder whether Oracle are really negotiating in good faith in this matter
The OAUG has always stood for the independent voice of the user community. We have received consistent and clear feedback from our members that they wish have a forum for education and feedback which is, and can clearly be seen to be, independent from the Oracle message. We recognise Oracles marketing needs, and believe that our proposed compromise meets those needs, and the stated needs of existing users. If Oracle really had the interests of the users at heart it would not behave in this way. However such behaviour by Oracle only goes to reinforce the importance and value of a truly independent users group.
Jeremy Young
OAUG President
null

OAUG Responds to Oracle's Proposal

An Open Letter to Mark Jarvis and Ron Wohl
Mark, Ron
Thank you for setting out your proposal to the OAUG on AppsNet. It was useful to see it in writing, although, as you mentioned, it is largely similar to what was proposed and presented to our membership a year ago. As we had a teleconference a few hours before publication it would have been useful to have been given some advance notice of your plan to publish.
However as this has occurred I would like to clear up some errors and omissions in the document.
1. You state that the OAUG would select 100% of the user papers. You omit to mention that would represent 25% of the total conference content, and that 75% would therefore not be user papers (as explained to us in the conference call at 9am PST yesterday, Wednesday 23 May).
2. You state that no proposals were ever put forward by the OAUG board. In the 23 May conference call, just hours before your AppsNet posting, we had proposed that if you were able to support a Fall North American OAUG conference, we would be willing to collaborate with you in line with your proposals for the Spring in North America as well as in Europe and Asia Pacific.
3. You state that you would be required to take 200 developers out of development for a week of OAUG, and before you know it we would have 400 Oracle employees engaged in each conference. Perhaps you had forgotten that a few hours earlier we had indicated that the level of support that we were requesting for the Fall conference was development staff to cover 55 sessions. Given that the next two Fall OAUG events are on the West Coast, even with travel and preparation time this represents about 120 people days, rather than the 2800 employee weeks that you refer to.
4. Twice you state that there are going to be seven conferences in the next twelve months, and refer to four OAUG conferences. When you asked on the conference call if we would participate with you in Europe, we said yes, we would. When you asked where our venue was for Europe next year, we told you that in light of the current situation we had released it. When we discussed Asia Pacific we told you that we intended to hold our conference in Sydney, but that we did not believe that it would affect your conference in Singapore which is several months and several thousand miles away. We agreed that we would be willing to discuss the model in Asia Pacific with you, as you had indicated the possibility of an alternative style event. We were not clear how that would work. In addition, given our willingness to discuss the North American model, you were well aware that seven conferences in the next twelve months was most unlikely.
5. You stated that for the past five years a majority of Oracle employees attending and staffing OAUG conferences were required to pay full attendance. I dont propose to count, but for the record, approximately sixty were free, any Oracle presenters above the sixty were free, and the conference workers paid a reduced rate to cover the costs involved, such as food. Any others who decided to attend did indeed have to pay.
It is hard for us to understand why it has been so difficult to bring this issue to closure. The OAUG Board understands that once Oracle had committed to its AppsWorld events for Spring 2001 that you were too busy to meet with us to discuss a longer term resolution, for example when we proposed a meeting with you in January. It was unfortunate that you were unable to meet the target date of meeting in March after your conference. We were pleased that we finally met on 30 April, and that we appeared to be making some progress in identifying issues and seeking to resolve them. It was disappointing that you had to postpone the agreed follow up meeting from the first week in May to 23 May, and that only then were you able to inform us that you had a deadline for just a week later.
We had sought to avoid going into details on the discussions in public, as we felt that might jeopardise progress. I am not clear what your purpose was in doing so. We continue to be disappointed by Oracles inability to compromise, and that after all of this time, this proposal so closely resembles the original proposal made last year. I would like to make quite clear what the OAUG has offered, and the flexibility that we have shown in being willing to move from the existing, successful model, to try to accommodate your valid needs to reach a wider audience.
The OAUG has proposed that :
7 The OAUG would be willing to collaborate with Oracle on their AppsWorld events in North America, if in return Oracle would participate in the OAUGs independent Fall North American conference to the extent of approximately sixty development staff.
7 The OAUG, in line with the majority of feedback received from European users, would be willing to collaborate with Oracle on their AppsWorld event in Europe.
7 The OAUG, after the Sydney Asia Pacific event which we have committed to in 2001, would be willing to collaborate with Oracle in their AppsWorld event in Asia Pacific, subject to clarification as to the form of that event.
I believe that is a more than reasonable proposal.
Given that Oracle decided to move these discussions into the public arena, that they did so in such an extensive way just a few hours after a discussion with the OAUG, and without giving any advance warning, I am forced to wonder whether Oracle are really negotiating in good faith in this matter
The OAUG has always stood for the independent voice of the user community. We have received consistent and clear feedback from our members that they wish have a forum for education and feedback which is, and can clearly be seen to be, independent from the Oracle message. We recognise Oracles marketing needs, and believe that our proposed compromise meets those needs, and the stated needs of existing users. If Oracle really had the interests of the users at heart it would not behave in this way. However such behaviour by Oracle only goes to reinforce the importance and value of a truly independent users group.
Jeremy Young
OAUG President
null

Have you tried putting something like Apache infront of the ORDS and have /ords setup in there to need http basic?

HCM Process and Forms - Clarification required reg BADI QISR1.

Hi all,
I want to have some extra validations done on some of the fields of my HCM Process Adobe form. For this, I created a new implementation for the BADI QISR1 with filter value as my Custom Scenario and implemented the method INT_SERVICE_REQUEST_CHECK. Validation is working now, but, it's not updating any data to the back end after I submit. When I checked, I found that SAP has written the whole logic to update the data to the Infotypes in another Implementation of the same BADI,which was like the Default implementation. But, that implementation is not getting triggerred now, as I have a new one now.
Do I have to copy the whole update logic to this Implementation now? Or is there any other setting for this?
Kindly help me.
Regards!
Mahesh

Not sure I follow you here, but here's some basics.
For any backend updates to infotypes, you should use the standard services SAP_PA, SAP_PT and SAP_PD (if on EhP4).
In some case, this won't work. So you have two choices:
(1) write and advanced generic service to handle this (difficult and no examples from SAP)
(2) write custom code triggered in workflow to do this (such as a custom function module) to handle your updates (past EhP2, you have to use the same classes as the decoupled framework uses....not the good ol' "infotype operations" standard FM).
Now, as for validations, you can handle those separately. In fact, talk about timely! (haha) I just posted a blog on this just now. =)
/people/christopher.solomon/blog/2009/06/22/hcm-processes-forms-required-fields-arent-what-they-use-to-be

Oracle Forms 11g Installation in 64 bit Platform - Clarification Required

Hi
I need to install Forms 11.1.1.2.0 in Windows 2007 server.
Please let me know if the steps defined are correct.
Install 11g R2 Oracle DB
•     Install JDK 1.6 x64
•     Install Weblogic server 10.3.2 (generic)
•     Install Forms/Reports 11.1.1.2 x64
Few more questions ...
Can I install Forms 11.1.1.2 (32 bit download) in 64 bit machine (Windows 2007 server)?
Can I install Forms 11.1.1.3 (32 bit download) in 64 bit machine (Windows 2007 server)?
Thanks,
Ram

Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2

Across row validation in tabular form and across items in row validations.

Hi,
We are upgrading to APEX 4.0.
I need to create a tabular form that will have a start date and an end date. FOr each new row or updated row I need ensure its start date is after the end date of all rows already entered and its end date is after the start date of row being entered. Also that if no end date is entered then no other rows can be found with a null end date.
SO I need across field validations with in a row and across row validattions. That is I need rowset validations as well.
Is it possible to do this with APEX? WHat kind of tabular solution would allow these type of validations. How might these validations be done?

Okay, Here's a quick rundown on how to build a manual form using APEX_ITEM and collections. The process goes in 4 steps: gather the data, display the data, update based on user input, then write the changes. Each step requires it's own piece of code, but you can extend this out as far as you want. I have a complex form that has no less than a master table and 4 children I write to based on user input, so this can get as complex as you need. Let me know if anything doesn't make sense.
First, create the basic dataset you are going to work with. This usually includes existing data + empty rows for input. Create a Procedure that fires BEFORE HEADER or AFTER HEADER but definitely BEFORE the first region.
DECLARE
v_id     NUMBER;
var1     NUMBER;
var2     NUMBER;
var3     VARCHAR2(10);
var4     VARCHAR2(8);
cursor c_prepop is
select KEY, col1, col2, col3, to_char(col4,'MMDDYYYY')
    from table1
    where ...;
i         NUMBER;
cntr      NUMBER := 5; --sets the number of blank rows
BEGIN
OPEN c_prepop;
    LOOP
      FETCH c_prepop into v_id, var1, var2, var3, var4;
      EXIT WHEN c_prepop%NOTFOUND;
        APEX_COLLECTION.ADD_MEMBER(
        p_collection_name => 'MY_COLLECTION',
        p_c001 => v_id, --Primary Key
        p_c002 => var1, --Number placeholder
        p_c003 => var2, --Number placeholder
        p_c004 => var3, --text placeholder
        p_c005 => var4 --Date placeholder
    END LOOP;
CLOSE c_prepop;
for i in 1..cntr loop
    APEX_COLLECTION.ADD_MEMBER(
        p_collection_name => 'MY_COLLECTION',
        p_c001 => 0, --designates this as a new record
        p_c002 => 0, --Number placeholder
        p_c003 => 0, --Number placeholder
        p_c004 => NULL, --text placeholder
        p_c005 => to_char(SYSDATE,'MMDDYYYY') --Date placeholder
end loop;
END;Now I have a collection populated with rows I can use. In this example I have 2 NUMBERS, a TEXT value, and a DATE value stored as text. Collections can't store DATE datatypes, so you have to cast it to text and play with it that way. The reason is because the user is going to see and manipulate text - not a DATE datatype.
Now build the form/report region so your users can see/manipulate the data. Here is a sample query:
SELECT rownum, apex_item.hidden(1, c001), --Key ID
     apex_item.text(2, c002, 8, 8) VALUE1,
     apex_item.text(3, c003, 3, 3) VALUE2,
     apex_item.text(4, c004, 8, 8) VALUE3,
     apex_item.date_popup(5, null,c005,'MMDDYYYY',10,10) MY_DATE
FROM APEX_COLLECTIONS
WHERE COLLECTION_NAME = 'MY_COLLECTION'This will be a report just like an SQL report - you're just pulling the data from the collection. You can still apply the nice formatting, naming, sorting, etc. of a standard report. In the report the user will have 3 "text" values and one Date with Date Picker. You can change the format, just make sure to change it in all four procedures.
What is critical to note here are the numbers that come right before the column names. These numbers become identifiers in the array used to capture the data. What APEX does is creates an array of up to 50 items it designates as F01-F50. The F is static, but the number following it corresponds to the number in your report declaration above, ie, F01 will contain the primary key value, F02 will contain the first numeric value, etc. While not strictly necessary, it is good practice to assign these values so you don't have to guess.
One more note: I try to align the c00x values from the columns in the collection with the F0X values in the array to keep myself straight, but they are separate values that do NOT have to match. If you have an application you think might get expanded on, you can leave gaps wherever you want. Keep in mind, however, that you only have 50 array columns to use for data input. That's the limit of the F0X array even though a collection may have up to 1000 values.
Now you need a way to capture user input. I like to create this as a BEFORE COMPUTATIONS/VALIDATIONS procedure that way the user can see what they changed (even if it is wrong). Use the Validations to catch mistakes.
declare
j pls_integer := 0;
begin
for j1 in (
select seq_id from apex_collections
where collection_name = 'MY_COLLECTION'
order by seq_id) loop
j := j+1;
--VAL1 (number)
apex_collection.update_member_attribute (p_collection_name=> 'MY_COLLECTION',
      p_seq=> j1.seq_id,p_attr_number =>2,p_attr_value=>wwv_flow.g_f02(j));
--VAL2 (number)
apex_collection.update_member_attribute (p_collection_name=> 'MY_COLLECTION',
      p_seq=> j1.seq_id,p_attr_number =>3,p_attr_value=>wwv_flow.g_f03(j));
--VAL3 (text)
apex_collection.update_member_attribute (p_collection_name=> 'MY_COLLECTION',
      p_seq=> j1.seq_id,p_attr_number =>4,p_attr_value=>wwv_flow.g_f04(j));
--VAL4 (Date)
apex_collection.update_member_attribute (p_collection_name=> 'MY_COLLECTION',
      p_seq=> j1.seq_id,p_attr_number =>5,p_attr_value=>wwv_flow.g_f05(j));
end loop;
end;Clear as mud? Walk through it slowly. The syntax tells APEX which Collection (p_collection_name), then which row (p_seq), then which column/attribute (p_attr_number) to update with which value (wwv_flow.g_f0X(j)). The attribute number is the column number from the collection without the "c" in front (ie c004 in the collection = attribute 4).
The last one is your procedure to write the changes to the Database. This one should be a procedure that fires AFTER COMPUTATIONS AND VALIDATIONS. It uses that hidden KEY value to determine whether the row exists and needs to be updated, or new and needs to be inserted.
declare
begin
--Get records from Collection
for y in (select TO_NUMBER(c001) x_key, TO_NUMBER(c002) x_1,
             TO_NUMBER(c003) x_2,
             c004 x_3,
             TO_DATE(c005,'MMDDYYYY') x_dt
           FROM APEX_COLLECTIONS
           WHERE COLLECTION_NAME = 'MY_COLLECTION') loop
    if y.x_key = 0 then --New record
        insert into MY_TABLE (KEY_ID, COL1,
            COL2, COL3, COL4, COL5)
          values (SEQ_MY_TABLE.nextval, y.x_1,
              y.x_2, y.x_3, y.x_4, y.x_dt);
    elsif y.x_key > 0 then --Existing record
        update MY_TABLE set COL1=y.x_1, COL2=y.x_2,
             COL3=y.x_3, COL4=y.x_4, COL5=y.x_dt
         where KEY_ID = y.x_key;
    else
      --THROW ERROR CONDITION
    end if;
end loop;
end;Now I usually include something to distinguish the empty new rows from the full new rows, but for simplicity I'm not including it here.
Anyway, this works very well and allows me complete control over what I display on the screen and where all the data goes. I suggest using the APEX forms where you can, but for complex situations, this works nicely. Let me know if you need further clarifications.

RetrorespectiveActivation of Multiple Form 16 in mid- of the financial year

Hi All,
We have mainatined TAN as per the company Code in feature 40ECC. Now we want to have multiple Form 16 if there is change in company Code of an employee for the financial year 2009.
We have not activated Multiple Form 16 Switch so far. Now in the last month of financial Year 2009 that in March'2010 (period 12/2009) we want to activate Multiple Form 16 switch from 01.04.2009. After activation Multiple form 16 Switch, we are planning to trigger retro for all employees from 01.04.2009.
But we are not very much sure what will be the impact of activating Multiple Form 16 switch now in the last period of the financial year.
Required your valuable inputs on this.
Thanks,
Ravinder

Hi,
Check whether multiple Form 16 switch is active or not.
In case this is active, then the Form 16 will be generated as under:
Company A - showing earnings from 01.04.08 to 31.12.08 only
Company B - showing earnings from 01.01.09 to 31.03.09 as current earnings and from 01.04.08 to 31.12.08 as income from previous employment.
In case multiple Form 16 is not active, then the Form 16 that you are getting is correct. However, in this case you need not print the Form 16 of company A. Only the Form 16 from the company code where the employee belongs to as on 31.03.2009 (i.e. last day of the FY) will be printed. And in this case the Form 16 will include complete earnings from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 as current earnings.
Hope this clarifies your query.
VK

Mutipart/form data in request

Hi to All,
I need to get the form bean object values in filter class from the request for doing some validation.
For get request there is no problem to get the data from the request. But for the 'multipart/form-data'
after reading the data in filter class , it is not able to retrieve in the action class. But I am using 'RequestWrapper'
then the normal request datas get losed. I need to get the data from both POST and GET.
Thanks in adavance ..

Sunil,
Resstructuring Infocube.
With this function, you can fill an InfoCube with requests that have already been loaded into a BW, or into another InfoCube. You can, therefore, create a new InfoCube in BW, and use data that has already been loaded successfully into the PSA or into the IDOCs to fill the new InfoCube.
In the InfoCube tree, choose the InfoCube that you want to fill > right click > Administrate.
Choose Reconstruct > Selection, and, using the selection options, determine the requests that you want to use to reconstruct the InfoCube.
Select the corresponding requests from the list, and choose Reconstruct.
NOTE:
This function is particularly useful, if you are loading deltas, that is, data that you cannot request again from the source system.
Let me know if you need any further clarifications.
Thanks
Ramu

How to call a swing form from another swing form by clicking a button

i created a swing frame , this frame have a form and an internal form. in this form have 3 buttons OK , CANCEL , NEW. i created some other forms i.e OKFORM, CForm,NForm. i want to invoke the OkForm when i click OK Button, Similar implimentation for other buttons too. i want the button logic to invoke other form. please send reply ASAP.

A great resource that has helped me and will probably help you is an article entitled [How To Ask Questions The Smart Way|http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] . It will tell you how to formulate your questions so that the folks here will be better able to answer them.
For instance, just what is a form?
I notice that you've posted twice before and that both posts stimulated responses like mine, responses that asked for clarification, and that you never replied in either of the previous threads. Again, I urge you to read the link above ASAP, else you will find fewer and fewer people interested in helping you.
Good luck.

How to pass a value from the report to a form ( BIT OF URGENT ).

Hi,
I had created a "Form on a Table with Report" on the report I had remove the edit link and set one of the column feilds that functionality. Now I want to know how to pass that value that is clicked ( having hyper link ) on to the form where it runs a SQL query and then displays the reuslts on the form.
Illustrating with an example.
I am having these following columns on the report ( these are the results for the join statement )
JOBNUM JOBNAME DEPTNUMBER SAL EMPNO LNAME FNAME
In the above JOBNUM is having Hyper link as I removed the edit image.
Now this is area I am having problem. When the user clicked on the JOBNUM then on form it should display 20 other columns( pulled from 5 other tables ) which are related to that particualr JOBNUM.
Anybody give me a solution in which area I have to include my SQL statement and how to pass that selected value to that SQL statement.
Cheers,
Krishna

Hi Ron,
I am doing exaclty what you have suggested me but no luck. I started changing the DEMO_CUSTOMERS application to my requirements.The report is working fine and on the report I have created a page attribute to the Hyper linked column and linked that to the page 2 and assign that attribute with #JOBNUM#.
I am able to pass that value on to form when I click on the JOBNUM. But the problem is I am not able to pass that value into the SQL query so that my query pulls 20+ columns on to the Form ( which is second page ).
Small clarification... On the form region it is said FORM NAME and type is HTML is that is the way the APEX was designed or does it need to say region type as FORM.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Cheers,
Krishna.

Clarification on a FDA form.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for