Classification system, new object

Hello,
I would like to create a new object by using the classification system; for this I created the relevant entries in the customizing (SPRO -> Cross application components -> classification system). I created a new Z-table as well new class type Z01.
Now I would like to assign an object to the new class type; for this I created a new Z-class with the class type Z01 and used transaction CL24N to assign an object to this class. But I got a runtime error which says DYNPRO_NOT_FOUND. The defined screens in the customizing do not exist. The ST22 says that the screen I defined in customizing is missing in the program SAPLCBCM_ABA.
How to proceed using the CL24N? Do I have to create the missing screens or will they be generated automatically?
Thank you for your hints.
Regards,
Kurt.

Hello Parem,
I would like to create a new class type (e.g. Z00) to handle a complete new object. I will store properties for a definite object (like properties for MARA) assigned in a own Z-table.
Thanks & best regards,
Kurt.

Similar Messages

Schema of a new Object Type: message pass the BIU without validation

Hi,
i've defined a new Object Type for send messages to Web Service. I've created the schema files and i've uploaded there in repository with the "Import" function of GUI. After, i've defined the XML file for the "Execute" function of the B1i GUI.
After the load of files, in the repository the files are in correct position.
In my BIU the definition of sender and receiver system type is correct, and also the definition of SenderMainObjectTypeID and ReceiverObjectTypeID. The message from B1 pass through the IPO chain without problems and the message is received by teh Web Service.
If modify the file XSL into the BIU, a message with less elements than a schema pass without problem.
If delete the schema from repository, the message pass without validation.
I would know because the schema is bypassed...
Thans

Ok,
solved with introduction of validation point in a customized IPO using a branch / unbranch atoms.
Bye.

To add new object link in DMS

Hi Sir/Madam,
Currently we are implementing DMS(Document Management System) and
our main requirement is to add document to the delivery and billing
document.In t-code dc10 in "define object link" lips and vbrp object is
not present in the default list so how we can add these new object in
order to attach new document to delivery as well as billing document.
Is it possible to attach document at header level because we have to
attach lorry number at delivery header which will be common for all the
items.
The function module object_check_lips already exist in se37 but we
have to create new function module for object vbrp.How to create this
function module? How we have to create screens for these objects? If we
have to create it by copying some function module like
object_check_equithan what will be the funtion group.
IN delivery document (vl03n) in menu bar in "extras" document
option is not there than how we will see the attached document, do we
have to create this option with help of abaper or this option will
automatically reflect after all the cofiguration?
Thanks and Regards
Abhilash Nayak

Hi Abhilash,
You need to gofor z-development for this. The Abap'r will add the new required object in object link field. Also the DMS screen will appear in the required t-code.
Meantime you need to add this object in SPRO , "maintain key fields".
I hope this will resolve the query.
Regards,
Ravindra

New-object itextsharp causes an error

Hi, i am trying to use powershell to read a pdf document with the following code
[System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadFrom(".\itextsharp.dll")
$reader = New-Object iTextSharp.text.pdf.PdfReader -ArgumentList ".\201408_issue.pdf"
for ($page = 1; $page -le $reader.NumberOfPages; $page++) {
$lines = [char[]]$reader.GetPageContent($page) -join "" -split "`n"
foreach ($line in $lines) {
if ($line -match 'test')
$matches[1]
I get an error though, has anyone encoutnered this? Thanks
New-Object : Exception calling ".ctor" with "1" argument(s): "Object reference not set to an instance
of an object."
At C:\PsScripts\test\PDFReader\PDFReader.ps1:2 char:11
+ $reader = New-Object iTextSharp.text.pdf.PdfReader -ArgumentList ".\201408_RIN_i ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (:) [New-Object], MethodInvocationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ConstructorInvokedThrowException,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.NewObject
Command

PS C:\PsScripts\test\PDFReader> $error[0].Exception | Format-List * -Force
ErrorRecord : Exception calling ".ctor" with "1" argument(s): "Object reference not
set to an instance of an object."
StackTrace : at System.Management.Automation.DotNetAdapter.AuxiliaryConstructorInvo
ke(MethodInformation methodInformation, Object[] arguments, Object[]
originalArguments)
at
System.Management.Automation.DotNetAdapter.ConstructorInvokeDotNet(Type
type, ConstructorInfo[] constructors, Object[] arguments)
at
Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.NewObjectCommand.CallConstructor(Type
type, ConstructorInfo[] constructors, Object[] args)
WasThrownFromThrowStatement : False
Message : Exception calling ".ctor" with "1" argument(s): "Object reference not
set to an instance of an object."
Data : {}
InnerException : System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance
of an object.
at iTextSharp.text.pdf.PdfReader.ReadObjStm(PRStream stream,
IntHashtable map)
at iTextSharp.text.pdf.PdfReader.ReadDocObj()
at iTextSharp.text.pdf.PdfReader.ReadPdf()
TargetSite : System.Object AuxiliaryConstructorInvoke(System.Management.Automation.Met
hodInformation, System.Object[], System.Object[])
HelpLink :
Source : System.Management.Automation
HResult : -2146233087
Any meaning to you?

Problem in creating new objects in ABAP workbench

Hi ,
I am getting error in a newly installed SAP system when try to create new objects in ABAP workbench. The error is like'No changes for the user allowed'.
Can you tell me what the error is here? What can be done for this so that I can create new object.
Thanks,
Manas

Hi,
Run tcode SU01. (Provided if u hav authorization to run this Tcode)
Enter SAP* as user and click on the Copy button.
Enter the name for your new user in the dialog box and click Continue
Enter a password for your new user.
Goto Profile sheet and adjust the profiles to be SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW.
Save the user and logon with it.
Now you'll be able to do your changes.
Reward Points if useful.
Regards
Rose
Edited by: Rose Preethi on Mar 31, 2008 5:20 PM

Dynamic Variables and New-Object - in a GUI

so, i have not found anything that i can parlay into a solution for what i am attempting to do.
Basically i am using powershell to build a GUI to manage websites on various servers.
in a nutshell:
- i have an array with the servers i want to query
- a foreach loop gets me the site names for each server (number of sites can vary on a server).
- need put checkboxes on a GUI for every site to do something (25-30 sites across 8 servers).
currently i am passing the $dir.name variable to a function that will create the new variable using this command:
$pName = $dir.name New-variable -name $pName -value (New-Object System.Windows.Forms.CheckBox)
$pName.Location -value (New-Object System.Drawing.Size(10,$i))
$pName.Size -value (New-Object System.Drawing.Size(100,20))
$Pname.Text -value $dir.name
$groupBox.Controls.Add($pName)
Problem is i am not able to do anything with my newly created variable. I am trying to use the following code to position the new checkbox but i get nothing (same for text, size, etc.) I am not seeing any errors, so i don't know what i have going
wrong.
is this even possible?
I am able to create static checkboxes, and i can create dynamic variables. But i can't mix the two...

Here is how we normally use listboxes to handle form situations like this one. The listboxes can automatically select subgroups.
The hash of arrays can be loaded very easily with a script or the results of the first list can be used to lookup and set the contents of the second.
Notice how little code is actually used. This is all of the setup code needed aside from the from definition:
$FormEvent_Load={
$global:serversToSites=@{
Server1=@('S1_SITE1','S1_SITE2','S1_SITE3')
Server2=@('S2_SITE1','S2_SITE2','S2_SITE3')
Server3=@('S3_SITE1','S3_SITE2','S3_SITE3')
$listbox1.Items.AddRange($serversToSites.Keys)
$listbox1_SelectedIndexChanged={
$listbox2.Items.Clear()
$listbox2.Items.AddRange($global:serversToSites[$listbox1.SelectedItem])
$listbox2_SelectedIndexChanged={
[void][System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox]::Show($listbox2.SelectedItem,'You Selected Site')
Here is the complete demo form:
[void][reflection.assembly]::Load("System.Windows.Forms, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089")
[void][reflection.assembly]::Load("System.Drawing, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a")
[System.Windows.Forms.Application]::EnableVisualStyles()
$form1 = New-Object 'System.Windows.Forms.Form'
$listbox2 = New-Object 'System.Windows.Forms.ListBox'
$listbox1 = New-Object 'System.Windows.Forms.ListBox'
$buttonOK = New-Object 'System.Windows.Forms.Button'
$InitialFormWindowState = New-Object 'System.Windows.Forms.FormWindowState'
$FormEvent_Load={
$global:serversToSites=@{
Server1=@('S1_SITE1','S1_SITE2','S1_SITE3')
Server2=@('S2_SITE1','S2_SITE2','S2_SITE3')
Server3=@('S3_SITE1','S3_SITE2','S3_SITE3')
$listbox1.Items.AddRange($serversToSites.Keys)
$listbox1_SelectedIndexChanged={
$listbox2.Items.Clear()
$listbox2.Items.AddRange($global:serversToSites[$listbox1.SelectedItem])
$listbox2_SelectedIndexChanged={
[void][System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox]::Show($listbox2.SelectedItem,'You Selected Site')
$Form_StateCorrection_Load=
#Correct the initial state of the form to prevent the .Net maximized form issue
$form1.WindowState = $InitialFormWindowState
$form1.Controls.Add($listbox2)
$form1.Controls.Add($listbox1)
$form1.Controls.Add($buttonOK)
$form1.AcceptButton = $buttonOK
$form1.ClientSize = '439, 262'
$form1.FormBorderStyle = 'FixedDialog'
$form1.MaximizeBox = $False
$form1.MinimizeBox = $False
$form1.Name = "form1"
$form1.StartPosition = 'CenterScreen'
$form1.Text = "Form"
$form1.add_Load($FormEvent_Load)
# listbox2
$listbox2.FormattingEnabled = $True
$listbox2.Location = '237, 26'
$listbox2.Name = "listbox2"
$listbox2.Size = '120, 134'
$listbox2.TabIndex = 2
$listbox2.add_SelectedIndexChanged($listbox2_SelectedIndexChanged)
# listbox1
$listbox1.FormattingEnabled = $True
$listbox1.Location = '13, 26'
$listbox1.Name = "listbox1"
$listbox1.Size = '120, 134'
$listbox1.TabIndex = 1
$listbox1.Sorted = $true
$listbox1.add_SelectedIndexChanged($listbox1_SelectedIndexChanged)
# buttonOK
$buttonOK.Anchor = 'Bottom, Right'
$buttonOK.DialogResult = 'OK'
$buttonOK.Location = '352, 227'
$buttonOK.Name = "buttonOK"
$buttonOK.Size = '75, 23'
$buttonOK.TabIndex = 0
$buttonOK.Text = "OK"
$buttonOK.UseVisualStyleBackColor = $True
#Save the initial state of the form
$InitialFormWindowState = $form1.WindowState
#Init the OnLoad event to correct the initial state of the form
$form1.add_Load($Form_StateCorrection_Load)
#Clean up the control events
$form1.add_FormClosed($Form_Cleanup_FormClosed)
#Show the Form
$form1.ShowDialog()
You can easily substitute CheckedListbox if you like checkboxes.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

IView and system admin objects appear changed or not registered when transported

Hi,
Recently we moved a few objects - iViews, pages and roles as epa and system admin objects as config archive and imported them manually to Test system. But when checked in the next landscape, the iView properties appear different. Eg. In Development system, the iView was unchecked for visibility option i.e. iView should not be visible. But when transported to test system, the property was checked and gave error. On reimporting, the same thing happened and we had to manually correct the property. This is not an expected behaviour and manual changes are not to happen after development changes.
Similarly, though config archive import showed the 2 new system objects in the respective location of Test system, the expected functionality was not working. I checked this by deleting one of them and manually creating the same entry and it worked fine. So I also had to delete the 2nd one and create a manual entry. The system admin objects we used pertained to System Configuration --> Content Mgmt--> Form Based Publishing --> Forms Availablity --> Folder Settings
We also moved kmcs and they are reflecting properly with correct folder permissions.
We don't understand why this is so occurring (iView and system admin entry appearing different or not getting registered )and never experienced such a case in previous projects. We don't want to face the issue going forward when transporting changes to staging and Prod systems.
Please assist as to what went wrong or any probable cause and solution for same.
Thanks,
Janani

Hi,
Has anyone faced such a situation before and know the reason for same ?
Regards,
Janani

New Object Types for Object Links

Need to create new Object type to object link Product hierarchy from ECC to RPM Item. Field is PRDHA.
Do we need to create new structure to have the Key linking PRDHA.
Any suggestions?

Hi,
For this, you need to create Key, Proxy class and search field.
Logically if you use same Proxy class and key as that of PO then the system will search for PO number rather than PR.
I hope you are clear now.
Take help of an ABAPer
Niranjan
Let me know if it helps !!!

Maintain Screen for Object Link - New Object

Hi
We want to create new object link ( not standard SAP) in our company.
I try to add new screen for link other SAP object : SE80 ---> Package : CV --->
Function Group : CV130 , add new screen . It seems as REPAIR , Ask me for access key .
Is it OK?
Help Activities:
f the screen entry contains errors or you want to add a new entry you
an check the existing screen sas follows:
   Start a second mode and execute the following steps:
   -   Start the Object Navigator.
   -   Display the objects for development class CV
   -   Expand the function group 130
       The structure notes screens lists all screens that can be used
       for an object link
   -   Find the screen for the object link (such as 1201 for material
       link).
   Process the activity Maintain screen for object link in the first
   mode.
   -   Correct the entry or add an entry for the the object you want to
       add to the document link.
Thanks, Meira.

Hi Dave,
First of all you didn't mention which version you are using and Which Real Estate you are on. there are 2 RE
1. Classic Real Estate (Real Estate)
2. Flexible Real Estate Management
Now coming to Question
for Flexible Real Estate Mangement the path is
SPRO---->Flexible Real Estate Mangement (RE-FLX) -
>General Setting for Master and contract -
>
Document Mangement -
>Document Mangement System -
>Maintain Screen for Object Link
The above path is for ECC 6.0
Thanks
Veman.

There is no iView available for system "SAP_SRM": object "sc". For more inf

Hello,
I'm using SRM 7.0 and i'm facing the following problem:
When we try to open an existing shopping cart:
"There is no iView available for system "SAP_SRM": object "sc". For more information, contact your administrator. "
This issue happens when a Purchaser click on any shopping cart number in the Purchasing overview screen.
It's working fine in the standard role, but i created a new role with some delta links to objects but it's not working.
I checked the permission on the system SAP_SRM and on the objects they are all:
Name: Everyone (grouoe)
Adminstrator: none
User: checked
The system alias SAP_SRM is well defined and the connection to this system works fine.
Any hint for me?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Thomas

It had to do with OBN.
I copied the role but deleted a folder called "Navigation". But all the iViews to wich the shopping cart needed to navigate were linked under that folder.
So just copied again the role but this time without deleting the Navigation folder...and away was the problem

Use String Variable in New Object Creation

Thanks to those who review and respond. I am new to Java, so please be patient with my terminoloy mistakes and fumblings. I am reading in a file and I want to create a new object based on specific field (car for example). As you will notice I grab field 8 here label sIID.
String sIID = dts.group(8);
BTW this regex grouping works fine. The problem is seen when I try to use the sIID variable in my new object creation process.
DateParse sIID = new DateParse();
My IDE is reporting "Variable sIID is already defined in the scope"
Is this possible? The assumption is that the sIID will have different value during the processing of the file. For example, car could mean truck, sedan, etc with operators like color, number of doors, mileage, top speed, etc.

Thanks for the reply. I have include similar and much shorter code for the sake of brevity.
My problems are centered around the x variable/object below. Ideally this would translate to three objects PersonA, PersonB, etc that I could reference later in the code as PersonA.newname if I wanted to. Hopefully this makes sense.
public class TestingObjects {
public static void main(String[] argv) {
 String [] names;
 names = new String[3];
 names[0] = "PersonA";
 names[1] = "PersonB";
 names[2] = "PersonC";
 for (String x:names) {
 PN x = new PN(); // <- Problem
 x.name = x;
 x.SayName();
 System.out.println(x.newname);
public class PN {
 String name;
 String newname;
public String SayName() {
 newname = "Name = " + name;
 System.out.println(name);
 return newname;
}

Add New Object in a DMS Object Link

Hi everybody,
i am trying to create an object link to Service Entry Sheet. (tcode: ML81N, ESSR-LBLNI)
by sap instructions i did this step:
"You must create two new screens with the same number for the module pools SAPLCV130 and SAPLCV140 .
The processing logic must follow that of screen 1204 in program SAPLVC130."
and this step:
Create function module OBJECT_CHECK_XXXX (XXXX = ESSR ) which i have copied from OBJECT_CHECK_EQUI .
I have done above step .
I created Screen For SAPLCV130 and SAPLCV140 with screen No 1272. give same flow logic of screen 1204.
I created Function Module OBJECT_CHECK_ESSR.
After this What I have to do for displaying ESSR object in DMS as Object Link.
Please Guide me as soon as possible.
Thanks
Pranesh

Hi,
Since I think you already followed the below steps :
1. In the standard system, there are already two special screens for the module pools SAPLCV130 and SAPLCV140 for the linked SAP object.
You must create two new screens with the same number for the module pools SAPLCV130 and SAPLCV140. The processing logic must follow that of screen 1204 in program SAPLVC130.
2. Create function module OBJECT_CHECK_XXXX (XXXX = object name) If the object can be classified, this function module already exists .
Otherwise copy the function module for linking equipment DOCUMENT_CHECK_EQUI and change it as required for the new object.
Kindly go through the below once :
Link :[http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/2c/3fe93bad3ce333e10000000a114084/frameset.htm].
you define the object link in DMS customizing
e.g.For EBAN maintain screen number 247 in "Maintain view for screens to DMS object links" Then link EBAN to your document type
Hope it helps you.
Thanks
Arbind
Edited by: Arbind Prasad on Feb 24, 2011 5:46 PM

Adding new object TAB to DMS

Hi, all
I want add new new tab as my new object type. which is not available in standard set ie screens class CV130 TC 'SE80'
the new object requirment as per customer
1] Routing
2] Inspection Lot
3] Plan Maintanence
4] Clibration
Give procedure how to customize these new objects, which r not available as std screens for dms object links.
rgds
Ben

Hi Benaka,
In standard SAP system you can link DIR to various other SAP Objects for that, in customization setting choose :
Cross-application component->Document management->Control Data->Maintain Key fields.
Following steps to be followed as per IMG activity documentation(click & follow the step).
Regards,
Seema Pilankar
If it useful reward me the points.

Why do we allocate space for a new object???

When we create a new object, we instantiate it. Why do we do this. I read that we are allocating space for it. What is allocating space and why is it necessary??

Okay, say you have an object called Stick, which descibes a physical stick's characteristics:
class Stick
     private int length;
     Stick()
          //unparameterized constructor
          length = 1;
     Stick(int l)
          //parameterized constructor
          length = l;
     public int getLength()
          return length;
Pretty basic, right? Okay, looking at this code, you might say "well this is a class, not an object because it describes something, it's not an actual instance of the class". Right. So what people do is they instantiate things like Stick() into a static class (such as main) like so:
class Thingy
     public static void main(String args[])
          Stick s1 = new Stick();          //calls the unparameterized constructor
          Stick s2 = new Stick(4);     //calls the parameterized constructor
          System.out.println("Stick 1's length is "+s1.getLength());
          System.out.println("Stick 2's length is "+s2.getLength());
The unparameterized constructor line creates an instance (which is the same thing as an object) of class Stick using no parameters. The parameterized does the same, only it uses a length of 4 instead of the default 1 that the other constructor uses. The two instances s1 and s2 use the same class template, and can call the same methods, such as getLength(), but they contain different information in their data fields, for example "length" in class Stick. And that's how constructors work, and why they're useful. They're all about deriving a useful instance from either limited or abundant information.

How to add new object class to a material ?

Hi experts,
I have to add new object class to a material ( classification class ) and then add new characteristics values for the material ....But i do not know which FM to do this , If you please to give me the solution for this problem
PS: rewards immediately
Thanks,

Hi,
Check this CALL FUNCTION 'CLVM_CLASS_BOOK' Run it for IN UPDATE TASK
Reward if useful,

Classification system, new object

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for