Clearing Customer down payment for down payment amount not equal to Customer Invoice amount

Dear All,
               Below process are posting Customer transaction directly via FI without SD cycle.
            Customer down payment = 102 INR
            Customer Invoice = 103 INR
While doing Customer clearing w.r.t Invoice system has cleared the down payment document but posted an open item in Customer account with clearing document number  of value Rs 102  .
Concern:-
               1) How 1 INR difference will be countered , via receipt payment from customer from bank account ?
               2) In case we have defined tolerance limit of 5% for Customer and this come to be > 1 INR ,does SAP provide clearing Customer items
                   automatically via any Standard Customer clearing process based on rule defined  ?
Pls suggest
Regards
MJ

Hi,
the information of the exchange rates used for down payments, is
stored in table TCURR ( exchange rates)
For the request down payment the actual exchange rate of table TCURR
or the rate of document header is taken.
When this down payment request is payed, also the exchange rate of
the actual day (TCURR) is taken.
That´s why the amount in the bank posting in local currency result
from translating the foreign currency amount at the current rate,
instead of resulting from the total of the local currency amounts
from the settled items.
Regards,
Attila

Similar Messages

  • Need to apply payment for delivered items only, not full down payment

    Version: (8.8 PL18)
    Description of requirements: (Be able to handle the right amount of down payment when we copy a sales order to an invoice and there is a back order for some items. It actually works fine when we go on an invoice and we copy from a sales order, the system handles correctly the down payment amount when there is a back order. )
    Valid as of: (29/07/2011)
    Business needs: (They need to apply only the part of the payment for the delivered quantities, not ALL the payment.  In addition, the risk of errors to choose the wrong order is higher when you use the u2018copy fromu2019 function)
    Examples: (When you create a sales order with a down payment and you copy this document to an invoice and there is a back order, the amount of down payments should be adjusted according to the back order as it works now for the u2018copy fromu2019 function)
    Current Workaround:
    (We use the u2018Copy fromu2019 function.)
    Proposed solution:
    (The u2018Copy tou2019 function should work exactly as the u2018Copy fromu2019 function)

    It's not just a licensing requirement. Without the RIKLA you cannot make Reader plug-ins at all. Adobe will vet your proposal and decide if they will permit it, and what license fee you will pay.

  • [Incoming Payments for WTax] Primary Key not exist in DB

    While performing the TDS upgrade, I am getting an error message as "[Incoming Payments for WTax] Primary Key not exist in DB".
    I have checked that the sheet conforms to the instructions provided in the Upgrade guide but am not able to resolve this.
    Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Gyanesh

    Hi,
    It seems to be some field in the TDS upload Excel sheet which has primary key field not having the correct value.
    Double check the same where Primary Key if linked with some value in other sheet, enter the same.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Duplicate Invoice Check Not Checking the Gross Invoice Amount-

    Gurus,
    When checking for duplicate invoices in MIRO/FB60, I have made all the config and setup but still the system is not checking the gross Invoice amount field. Lets say I enter
    Invoice 1 :
                     Vendor                 X
                      Reference            123
                      Date                    10/27/2010
                      Company Code : 1111
                      Currency           : USD
                      AMOUNT           :100         and post this invoice
    I try to enter the second invoice
    Invoice 2: 
                       Vendor                 X
                      Reference            123
                      Date                    10/27/2010
                      Company Code : 1111
                      Currency           : USD
                      AMOUNT           : 90    
    I get the error message even though the AMOUNT in the second invoice is 90 which is not the same as first invoice .
    I chcked the vendor master duplicate check, made the config in spro-liv for duplicate invoice for company code, reference number and invoice date.
    The help says that after 4.6 version if all of them match, then the system wiill throw error, but in my case the amount is not matching and its still giving me an error.
    Kindly help..<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
    << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 27, 2010 4:07 PM

    Hi,
    After making the duplcate invoices chek at spro will checks the reference number of the invoice entered previouslu with that one entered later for that company code.as the first check itself failed system throws the error thinking, you are trying to enter a duplicate invoice for a  already posted invoice though how much is the amount in the second invoice .
    It will allow to enter the item details , if the dupplicate invoice check is properly configured for that company code and ref number .Did you get the error mesage after entering the details?If you get a error a message which stops furthur entry them your conf is correct, if not you may need to check back .
    Check the invoice toletrances at spro too amount.
    the below link explains you the process of dupliation in LIV.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/ce/4f3e39ea3aee02e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Regards,

  • Partial payment for down payment request

    Dear All
    I have posted a 1000 INR down payment request by F-37. However, the customer only pays me for 700 INR.
    If i use F-29 to record the downpayment and try to link this 700 INR to the original down payment request then the system does not allow me to post and gives the message"Posting is only possible with a zero balance; correct document". Also if i click on additional line items the system does not let me create a new downpayment request (Spl GL F) with posting key 09.
    Request you to tell me if i can let 300 INR as down payment request and $700 as down payment received agsint the first downpayment request.
    Regards,
    Siddharth.

    Hi Shankar,
    I am working on EC 6.0 in case that is relevant.
    Agreed that a downpayment request is a noted item and wont affect balances. But when you recieve downpayment against that downpayment request, the system does not let you proceed if there is a difference between the downpayment request and the downpayment.
    my query is whether i can post that downpayment w.r.t to the downpayment request and create the residual amount as a new downpayment request.
    Thanks for your reply but the problem remains unresolved. Will award you points though

  • Dimension 1 Cost centre field is not able to edit in Incoming payment for Down payment Request

    Hi Exports,
    I am facing an issue on selecting Cost centres in Incoming payment screen.
    Issue: While I am booking the payment entry for Down payment request, I am not able to select first Dimension cost centre in Incoming payment rows for down payment request document, the Second dimension is able to select and update. the field is in non-editable mode (only on specific document row)
    Setup:
    1. Two Dimension are enabled
    2. In Separate Columns - Both Cost Centres are in separate column
    The above issue is only for Down payment request, for other documents (Invoice) I am able to select and update cost centre
    Please find below snap shot for reference
    Kindly check and let me know the solution
    Regards,
    Kiran

    Hi Gordon,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Yes agree, The Down Payment request is not a financial document but the Cost centres are able to select in Down payment request rows, no issue at all in this case.
    In Incoming payment screen it is necessary to select Cost centres because it has financial implication using down payment request with related to currency difference or Bank charges (both are Expense accounts) and DR assignment is mandatory in this case.
    And you have to notice one thing in above issue, I am able to select second dimension cost centre and it is allowing to edit and update the cost centre on respective row. Only issue is specific cell (dimension 1 cost centre) is not able to edit.
    Even I am not able to process payment entry without selection of Cost Centre on first dimension, the system is blocking and displaying the error message "DR Assignment is mandatory on Dimension 1 for specific account"
    Looks like bug, please clarify
    SBO version: 9.0 PL 11
    Regards,
    Kiran

  • Custom dynamic names for outbound payment files in R12

    I have asked this on a couple of forums, but somehow missed this one.
    We are upgrading from 11i to R12 and require custom dynamic file names for the Payments output files (cheques, advices, efts). I see that you can create a custom prefix and extension through payment profiles, but the functionality is very limited (i.e. no date stamp). I am thinking that others must have come across this before, and am wondering how you have handled such a requirement. Is it possible to add custom steps to the seeded payment process? Can the payment process be run as part of a request set and then a custom step added which grabs the output file and renames it based on information obtained from the batch and the process profile. Our goal is a fully automated payment process where batches are scheduled, processed and files renamed and sent out to banks and a 3rd party printer with no user interventation.
    Any advice/tips would be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Tam.

    Hi Tam,
    Could you please let me know if you got the solution as we have a similar requirement of renaming the output file as perthe business needs fro which we need custom program.
    Thanks,
    Manas

  • Incoming payment for incoming payment, credit memo, journal entry &invoice

    The message subject is expression of my f**king confusing.
    Suppose, we received payment on account 120 Ringgit, invoice amount 210 Ringgit, JE transaction amount 10 Ringgit and credit memo amount (without copied from a certain invoice) 5 Ringgit.
    In one new incoming payment, I pay all the 4 transactions, is it correct procedure ? it means the balance of the customer will be zero, that's what we want to do. Thanks in advance
    Balaj

    First and foremost, I would like to stay that this is a Public Forum and you must refrain from using improper language.  There are people here to help you.
    If you want to adjust the JE, Payment on Account and Credit Memo aginst the Invoice and receive the balance amount, it is possible through incoming Payment.
    You will highlight the Invoice, CM, JE and check the Payment on Account box to include the On account amount, go to Payment means and in the amount column press CTRL+B to copy the balance amount and ADD the payment
    Suda

  • Customer balance confirmation does not equal to customer line item display

    Hi All
    When I run F.17 transaction (program SAPF130D) the totals don't equal to "customer line item display" program (FBL5N) totals.
    When I run it for a specific customer and company code, I can see that some items from the customer line item display are missing. These are regular items (invoices) like other documents that appear in the balance confirmation.
    The selection parameters are the same and the date is equal - I run the report as of today.
    Can anyone advice please?
    Thanks
    Ofer

    Hi
    The problem was because of a customer hierarchy issue. Some of the invoices were issued to different sold to but with the same payer.
    It can be displayed also in the balance confirmation. I just need to mark the two check boxes:
    "Head offices and branches" and "check alternative head offices". Excellent.
    Now I have another problem, that in this case, this issue is mentioned in the output: "Dear customer, in this balance confirmation we added the next branches...etc."
    Can this remark be eliminated from the output?
    Thanks
    Ofer

  • Total Baseline Hours For A Resource Does Not Equal the Sum of the Weekly Baseline Hours for that Resource

    Hi,
    I am using Project Server 2010. I have a project schedule that has been baselined and no actual work has been charged to it. The project has 3 resources. I am in the Resource Usage View. With 2 of the three resources, the hours in the Baseline Work Column
    on the left side of the view do not equal the sum total of weekly hours in the Timephased Grid. For instance, for resource JB the Baseline Work hours column says 1,392. When I total his weekly hours in the timephased grid I get 1368 hours; a variance
    of 24. Resource RS has 794.5 hours in the Baseline Work column but the sum total of his weekly timephased grid hours is 710.5, a variance of 84 hours. In both cases, the sum of the hours in the timephased grid is less than the hours in the Baseline Work column.
    What would be causing this? (I am cutting and pasting the weekly hours in the timephased grid into Excel and using the Excel sum function total).  Is there a better timephased view I should be looking at to try to find the "missing
    hours"? I have seen this before in project and it really has me stumped. Thanks.
    Judy Washington

    Hi Judy,
    I could not reproduce your issue. Is your Project Server patched with the latest SP and CU?
    Also can you reproduce this unexpected behavior with another project?
    Can you split your screen from the resource usage view, display the resource form and click right on the grey part selecting "schedule"? Then you'll have the scheduled start and finish dates for the resource's assignments. This is to be sure that
    you are not missing any parts of the assignments due to a wrong zoom in the timephased grid.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

  • HT204088 how to stop payment for purchases which is not of quality

    i have paid susbcription for fring 6 times by mistake because it is not working in iphone 4s ios 6.pls advice. i want to stop payment made through itunes

    Hi,
    First and foremost let me advice you to be very careful while doing this.
    For Rescheduling
    RSPC> chain > Goto > Planning view and
    click on Execution tab > select > Remove from Schedule and then in Maintain variant of start process reschedule for the day you require it to run.
    For terminating active chain
    You can start from SM37, find the process WID/PID then go to SM50 or SM51 and kill it. Once its done come back to RSMO and check the request, it should be red but again manually force to red and save by clicking on the total status button in the status tab. This shuld ensure that the process is killed properly.
    The next step will be to go to targets that you were loading and remove the red requests from those targets.
    Note: For source system loads you may have to check if the request is running in the source system and kill if needed and pull it again.
    But for BW datamart delta loads u may have reset the datamarts in case u are going to pull the delta again.
    Re: Kill a Job
    Re: Killing a process chain.
    Regards,
    JituK

  • Excise amount not updating while posting invoice

    Dear SCN's,
    I have done GRN and captured excise amount and later in invoice posting these captured excise values are not updating. Please help me out where the root cause might be, please share your views were might be the error. And also help me with information of excise tables updating while capturing excise invoice and posting excise invoice.
    Regards,
    Kumar

    For Domestic & Imports Excisable Material Procurement at Excisable Manufacturing Plant
    J_1IEXCHDR: Table for Excise header information.
    J_1IEXCDTL: Table for Excise item information.
    J_1IGRXREF: Table for Excise & Material document reference.
    J_1IPART1: Table for Part I entry
    J_1IPART2: Table for Part II entry.
    For Domestic & Imports Excisable Material Procurement at Excisable Depot
    J_1IEXCHDR: Table for Excise header information.
    J_1IEXCDTL: Table for Excise item information.
    J_1IRG23D : Table for Depot Register.

  • Blocking a Down payment for a particular vendor

    Hi Gurus,
    Can i block payments in form of Down payments to a particular vendor. All other bills that are due are eligible to be paid.
    I need this control to ensure that Payments for a particular vendor is always against an invoice and not downpayment.
    I cannot put the payment block in the vendor master because it will block payments for all other invoices
    Please help
    Thanks so much

    Hi.
    I am Basically MM guy. To resolve this issue I would like to suggest a work around.
    You can use the two payment terms.
    1) One payment term in the company code (In vendor master record in the Payment transaction accounting). In this payment term you have set a payment block indicator
    By doing this system will block all the invoices or Down payment which are posted in FI. Against this vendor. Hence system will not allow you to pay to this vendor against down payment.
    2) Another payment terms in the purchasing view of the Vendor master. In this payment terms do not set any block.
    When you post an invoice against a PO your accounting document will not be blocked.
    Hence you can pay to a vendor with reference to PO invoice.
    I am not sure. I hope it will work. If it helps award me.
    Cheers
    Umakanth

  • Consolidating In/Out Payments for BPs who are vendors and customers

    Hi
    We do business with a number of companies who are both vendors and customers and I am wondering if there is a better way of dealing with contra payments..
    At the moment I would do the following:
    I want to pay a supplier's November AP Invoices but they also owe us (a lesser amount) for November AR Invoices....
    1. I create an incoming payment for the amount of the AR Invoices but deposit the payment to a 'contra' account instead of our current account. (No actual funds have been received from the supplier/customer)
    2. I create an outgoing payment in the amount of the balance of the 'contra' account which pays off some AP Invoices in full and one AP Invoice in part. I choose the 'contra' account as the payment account.
    3. I create a second payment for the balance of the part-paid AP Invoice and the rest of the due AP Invoices. I choose the current account as the payment account.
    4. I send the supplier/customer 2 separate remittance advice notes along with a single cheque in the amount of the 2nd payment..
    Is there a better way of doing this which doesn't rely on me remembering to check whether a vendor is also a coustomer and whether they owe money for the relevant period before I do a payment run?
    Thanks for any advice (SAP 2007A)

    Check this WIKI, How to offset a business partner who is simultaneously a supplier and a customer?
    [https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=69861411]

  • What are the Transactions for outgoing payment ?

    Hi,
    i look for the transactions to use for outgoing payment for each payment method
    Please advise
    Regards.

    You need to add payment method (ZLSCH) as an additional selection item using T Code O7F1.  It will then appear as an addition selection in F-53 (post outgoing payment), when you select radio button 'Others' under Additional Selections.  You must be already aware that you can restrict automatic payment program (F110) to certain payment method(s).

Maybe you are looking for