Clubing transport requests together

Hi Experts,
We are in a peculiar situation.
I have one workbench transport request (already released & moved to R/3 test environment)
I have one customizing transport request (which I will create) in R/3 DEV environment.
Is there any way I can club these two requests together to form a single transport request which I can push in Prod.
Any thoughts will be most welcomed & rewarded with points.
Thanx in advance.
ASJ

Hi ASJ:
I am sorry, I tried the reverse (I merged Customizing Request with Workbench request). When I tried to merge WOrkbench with Cust, I got the error that you said. Maybe you can see if its possible to use the other way.
Release your Customizing Request.
Create a new Workbench Request.
Merge the old released Workbench Request into new one.
THen, again, merge the Customizing Request to new one.
THen, you will be good to go.
Ram Chamarthy

Similar Messages

  • One Transport request objects copy into new transport request

    Dear Experts,
    I created a transport request under which i saved my objects. <b>Now i need to  copy  old request objects into new request  or  split that transport request into number of new transport requests.</b>  First of all It is possible or not , if it is possible please tell  me the solution how to do.
    Regards,
    Krishna

    Hello Krishna
    You can
    (1) add object lists of already released requests ("old" requests) to you current request (still changeable)
    (2) merge changeable transport requests together
    (3) split a changeable request into several requests
    Whereas (1) and (2) are supported by standard functions of the SAP system (3) is a manual task involving the following steps:
    a.) Create a new request
    b.) Copy required transport entries (e.g.  R3TR TABL ZMYTABLE) from one request to the new request
    c.) Delete all copied transport entries from the object list of the "first" request
    However, if you are not fully aware of the dependencies between different transport object entries the splitting of object lists may cause hassle when you import the splitted requests into the next SAP system.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • Transport Request and Process Chain - Together?

    Hi,
    Is it safe to transport a request while a process chain is being run?
    Need your expert advice. Thanks!

    Hi Winnie,
    It should not affect the transport. Still a question, Does the transport request contain anything from the process chain?. If you could wait for sometime then do it after the process chain run is completed. Though I think unless you change anything in the Process chain like infopackage selection, etc. the transport should go through.
    Bye
    Dinesh

  • Merging Java Transport request with Abap Transport Request in Charm

    Hello All,
    We have activated the Change request Management in Solution Manager. Therefore transport request of type workbench and customising can be created when you choose action 'Create Transport Request'.
    However we have some SAP systems that have CTS+ integrated which allows to generate transport request number and attach objects in PI Integration Directory  - java transports.
    Question is - Is there a way we can integrate the java transports generated in these SAP systems  with Solution Manager  CHarm and transport creation.
    Or can we assign the java transports to charm in any way. 
    We are basically looking for how  when users create Charm, the abap and java transports relating to the charm are generated and created only from  Solution Manager manager or how these two transports can be linked together in Solution Manager.
    Thanking you in advance for your help.
    Tolly

    Hello Friends
    I have read the links and followed the instructions and tried to create object
    TABLENAME   R3TR  TABU and tried to save it.
    I keep getting a warning message 
    Note: ZTABLE1 is an application table
    Object TABU ZTABLE1 has object function "k", but no key.
    (I don't know what key to enter. I tried the Key field name, but it said 'Enter Numeric values only').
    If I ignore and save and try to create transport request and then import it on a different server, again only table structure is getting transported and not the contents/data of the table.
    I would appreciate if some one can please let me konw what I am doing wrong.
    Thanks
    Ram
    Edited by: Ram Prasad on Jun 2, 2009 3:38 PM
    Edited by: Ram Prasad on Jun 2, 2009 3:40 PM

  • BADI UserExit Required for Before transport Request is created

    Hi Friends,
    I have a problem in implementing  :
    We have two development client one for support and other for development.
    Same object can be worked together in both client simultaneously that is causing lot of synchronization problem in both client.
    Can any one suggest any BADI which i can use when creating Transport Request to check if the same object is locked in other client or not using the RFC.
    Please provide if there is any solution to implement the same.

    Hi
    Check the following BADI's
    <b>
    CTS_REQUEST_CHECK               Request checks</b>
    CTS_EXPORT_FEEDBACK           Feedback after export of a transport request
    CTS_IMPORT_FEEDBACK           Feedback after import of transport requests
    CTS_INT_REQUEST_CHCK          Internal: Request Checks
    CTS_TASKDOC_TEMPLATE        Determine template for the task documentation
    <b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
    Regards
    Anji

  • Error during the creation of transport request

    Hi
    After collection of the objects in transport connection and clicking on the truck icon. the follwing msg is being displayed and cannot more furthur with all objects.
    Edit objects separately since they belong to different original systems
    after clicking on the display icon...The followin msg is being displayed
    The objects R3TR IOBJ 0SOURSYSTEM und R3TR IOBJ 0LOGSYS cannot be edited together because the 1st object's original is in this system, whereas the 2nd object's original resides in another system.
    Did anyone come across this issue. Plz help me with the solution.
    Regards
    Annie

    Hi
    Sorry for late reply. I did maintain the conversion of logical system name in my production. In my production system, the error is 12 and in method exeuction is:
    Post-import methods for change/transport request: RBDK900062
    Post-import method RSOD_SBEL_AFTER_IMPORT started for SBEL L, date and time: 20070502202742
    Start of the after-import method   for object type(s) SBEL (Metadata Documents)
    Post-import method RS_AFTER_IMPORT started for APCO L, date and time: 20070502202743.
    These are the msgs in method execution after importing.
    Regards
    Annie
    Program terminated (job: RDDEXECL, no.: 20274200)
       See job log
    Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
    End date and time : 20070502203033
    Ended with return code:  ===> 12 <===

  • Customer routine during importing transport request

    Dear SAP-Specialists,
    the SAP-standard defines some objects as master data, but in our point of view it is not! So we want to transport these data (tableentries) via transportrequests to "qa" and productive system. But in case of some dependecies in the tables and the usage of GUIDS makes it important to get the possability to influence the data of the tables in the transportreaquest during the import-process in the system to prevent duplicate keys and so on.
    Is there any chance to realize this ?
    Thanks,
    André

    Hello Gabriel,
    you are right - some of the tables come from SAP standard with type 'A'. We found some functions to create a transport-request (TR) via ABAP-Code and collect all Masterdate-Tableentry's together in that TR. But the Key's of the table are GUID's. If they are now "normaly" imported in the target system, then the GUID's can be double, cause they can exist already in the target system. The second part of the data is an external-ID for wich we have to generate a system specific GUID during the import of the tabledata. Therefore we are looking for an user exit ore somthing like this - or if there is realy now wayto do this in that way, than we have to write some RFC-Functionmodules to transfer the data - but this is not the prefered way....

  • Delete an already released transport request

    Hello together,
    I have a problem in SE09/SE10 with a transport request.
    The request is as follows:
    Modifiable
        D01K939667 100   Username     /Description
            D01K939668   Username          Customizing Task
    The requests itself has the status "Modifiable". The task D01K939668 within the request is already released. I have to delete the whole request now, but when trying to delete it, it says "Request D01K939668  already released". How can I delete a task within a request, that is already released?
    Thank you for any help!
    Best regards
    Klaus Hirschegger

    Of course, you can
    But you have to chnage status of the request:
    Use transaction SE38 or SA38 and run program: RDDIT076
    Set your request number and run the program
    After request is shown double click on it
    You should be able to change status from R to D
    And now, you can delete the transport for example in transaction: SE10...
    Help on ABAP: Few Tips for Transport Request Manipulation

  • Error in transporting request through charms

    Dear Experts ,
    recently refreshed my quality systems data with production data ..and finished successfully, but we did not take any screenshots before doing refresh in quality
    my problem is we already configured charms in solution manager to transport requests to production system ...
    now we are  not able to transport request through charms .. because rfc connections are changed in quality ...
    please let me how can i recollect quality rfc connections for charms ...
    i dont have idea about charms configuration to reconfigure in quality.... please help in this
    Regards

    Hi,
    You need to transport the ODS 1st and then the transformation.
    The main reason for most of the transports to fail is:
    1)Transporting each and every object in the same transport request.
    Ideally,
              u2022The Infobjects should be transported first in a separate request.
              u2022Then the Data source and the Info providers (Cube, ODS, Data source and Multiproviders) together in a separate request.
               u2022At the end the transformations and the DTPu2019s in an another separate request.
    If the above mention sequence is followed while transporting the transport failures can be avoided.
    2)Also when a change is made to an ODS (I object added or deleted) it should again be transported along with the transformation but in separate request.
    I.e. the ODS 1st and the transformation.
    hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Mahesh

  • Transport Request in SE63 for FI Balance Sheet

    Hello All,
    I am in 4.6c and did some translations in
    TRANSLATIONS>LONG TEXTS> FURTHER TEXT -->FI BALANCE SHEET/ P&L STATEMENT
    I have a object creted but how do I include it in the transport request and send it to the QA system.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    When you perform translations via SE63 a transport is created automatically.
    Search for transports that contain following in the description :TRANSLATION individual 
    You can release these transports and import your translations in QA and later in PRD.
    PS : The transports can be under the user ID of someone else because translation transports are grouped together.
    Wim

  • Transport Request Creation.

    Hi,
    This is not an Issue, but I want advice from you people.
    In Materials Management, I am doing the following IMG Activities:
    a.     Copy plant
    b.     Maintain Purchasing Organization
    c.     Assign purchasing organization to company code
    d.     Assign purchasing organization to plant
    e.     Create Purchasing Groups
    While doing the above activities, I have created the following Requests:
    a.     IEDK900064: MM: Copy Plant, Assignment Plant-Company Code
    b.     IEDK900072: MM: Maintain Purchasing Organization
    c.     IEDK900076: MM: Create Purchasing Groups
    Please note that I have created the Transport Request based on the nature of the Activity, for example, I have saved activities b, c and d in the same Request.
    Here in our Team, the other Consultants are not agreeing with my way of working. They say that I should create only one Transport Request and save all my Activities in the same Transport Request.
    What is the better way to do the same?
    Please advice.
    Regards,

    Hi PK (and others),
    Best practice change control experts would argue either way really.
    Assuming all your changes are related to one another, ie required to resolve the business request for change (RFC), then it makes perfect sence to do what you can to tie them all together. That is minimize the number of transport requests in order to make sure they are all treated as a single unit of work to ensure all are transported from DEV - QAS - PRD in a unified manner..
    However, as mentioned by others, this may not be the most sensible way to manage the work. For example if any of your config requires adjusting it might have been best to have each within its own transport request.
    Best practice change control would have some way of tying each transport request back to its source RFC so that when the RFC status is approved then each would be moved with the set treated as a single unit of work.
    There are SAP specific software tools available for this, SolMan CharM being one but there are also a number of third party options.
    Perhaps this is helpful.
    Regards, Rick
    http://www.xrsc.com

  • Attaching Holiday Calendar to a Transport Request

    Hi experts,
    We are rolling out individual countries to our existing system in ECC 6.0. Therefore a lot of new holiday calendars are getting created. The existing option that is there in the system makes us transport all the calendars together to Production system.
    Since we already have old calendars in place and do not want to risk them, we wish to attach only new calendars to a transport request and move them to production individually. Is it possible? How can this be achieved?
    Thanks in advance.
    Peeyoosh

    Hi Peeyosh,
    Can you tell me how did you achieved.I do have a same Scenario.
    I thought in following way to achieve the btransport of individual calendars.
    I have included the Transport thru SCAL in a Workbench Request.
    I went on to SE10 and double clicked on the Workbench Request in chnage Mode.
    Then i double clicked over the tables.
    THOC ,THOCD , THOCI ,THOCS ,THOL ,THOLU,THOCT ,THOLT .
    Then in each i limited with the Required Calendars,public Holidays to be transported.
    Like i have entered the Calendar id's.
    Do you think this is right approach.I havent tested this option yet.
    Can you anyone suggest me on this.
    Regards,
    Nachy

  • Sub Transport Request for a Transport Request

    Hi,
    Just wanted to know why a sub Transport Request gets created once a Transport Request  is created for any changes are done on the RICEF objects.
    What is the purpose of the sub Transport Request.
    Ex, say a Transport Request XXXX123456 is created then a Transport Request XXXX123457 gets created as its sub Transport Request.
    The RICEF objects modified are attached with the sub Transport Request.
    Why can't the modified objects be attached with the primary Transport Request ?
    Please let me know this as this is the question I am really worried with.
    Regards,
    Binay.

    Hello Binay,
    To make things clear there is nothing called "Sub Transport Request" its called "Tasks".
    A TR can have many Tasks which may or may not be related. Tasks can be assigned to Multiple Users but TR can be assigned to one user ONLY.
    The Idea is to collate all the related objects & transport them together to subsequent SAP systems.
    E.g., You a developing a Z-Program which fetches data from Z-Table which your teammate is developing ) Mutliple tasks allows both of you to save your entries under the same TR.
    You can very well understand what will happen if this was not the case. There would have been too many dependency issues.
    Hope i made it clear to you.
    BR,
    Suhas

  • Object already locked under transport request by another user

    Hi Experts,
    While trying to generate transport request for my developments, the request is getting generated as a sub task under previously created request.The program has been earlier modified by another user and that request was not released.Can I create my own request number without creating it as a sub request? I cannot release or delete earlier requests.
    Regards,
    Sam

    This restriction is there for a reason. Somebody has already applied changes to the object you are changing now, so there would be a logical conflict if you would be able to lock it again under a different request. Before you release or delete anything, make sure you understand all changes done and if they can be moved together to subsequent systems. Speak to the "other user" if unsure.
    Thomas

  • Unable to capture the Data Source into a Transport Request

    Hi All,
    We have a product hierarchy and we are using the data source :4R_PRODH_D_LGEN_HIER for the hierarchy.
    Now we need to transport this structure to the quality environment but we were not able to capture the datasource:4R_PRODH_D_LGEN_HIER into a transport request.
    When ever we activate the data source:4R_PRODH_D_LGEN_HIER it is asking for the Package and the Transport Request Number.If we give these details and save it, data source is not getting captured in the request, only the "bject Directory Entry" is getting captured.
    Can someone please guide me on how to capture the datasource under "Data Sources in BW" in a transport request.
    Regards,
    Sachin Dehey.

    Hi Sachin,
    Hierarachy datasource is not captured as Attributes and Text Datasource. So what ever you have done is correct.
    What ever is captured in Object Directory Entry is correct. So go ahead with your transports, once transport is done check the Hierarchy Infopackage with Available OLTP hierarchies and load the data.
    Most important thing first see that the all Master & Transactional Datasources are transported in R/3 Dev to QA to PRD
    In BW, datasources are not transported, only their replica is transported.
    Transportation of Datasource is done in R/3. Only their replica is transported in BW.
    So wht ever you have done till now is correct. So go ahead.
    While attaching Hierarchy Datasource it is captured only in "Object Directory Entry"
    Regards,
    Vishnu.

Maybe you are looking for