Cmoninit high utilization issue

Guys,
I am experiencing an issue on the CUCM 5.1.3. Cmoninit is reaching 90% of utilization alone.
We tried to kill the process and reload the box, but, in few minutes the cmoninit processes get on the top again.
Do you know how to solve this issue?
Luiz Bianchini

Hey Luiz,
This is Sriram - we talked on the phone today to resolve this issue.
Just to close this thread out, we found that this is a known defect :
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsv47100
the root cause is that CAR Scheduler goes into a loop trying to create a fragment with servers running the DST in South American time zone
Snippet of CAR Scheduler loop :
2010-10-20 16:18:55,527 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): -->
2010-10-20 16:18:55,528 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): Creating BillingTable Partition
2010-10-20 16:18:55,537 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): The Partition part_20101009 is already present
2010-10-20 16:18:55,538 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): Run [UPDATE STATISTICS FOR PROCEDURE]
2010-10-20 16:18:55,977 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): Creating ErrorTablePartition
2010-10-20 16:18:55,982 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): The Partition part_20101009 is already present
2010-10-20 16:18:55,983 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): Run [UPDATE STATISTICS FOR PROCEDURE]
2010-10-20 16:18:56,768 DEBUG [DailyCdrLoad] services.FragmentManager - createTblPartition(): <--
These constant fragment creation attempts on the database results in the database service (cmoninit) spike.
Stopping CAR Scheduler network service on the Pub will reduce the CPU spike.
upgrading to an 5.1.3 ES will fix the issue.
- Sriram
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
cmoninit_spike_on_pub: Modified 10/21/2010 08:25:55 by srsivara
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
cmoninit_spike_on_pub: Modified 10/21/2010 08:25:55 by srsivara
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Eng-notes: Modified 05/22/2009 11:32:59 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Eng-notes: Modified 05/22/2009 11:32:59 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Eng-notes: Modified 05/22/2009 11:32:59 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
iRelease-CurrentStatus: Added 05/06/2009 11:24:35 by joncurra
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
iRelease-CurrentStatus: Added 05/06/2009 11:24:35 by joncurra
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
iRelease-CurrentStatus: Added 05/06/2009 11:24:35 by joncurra
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
V-comments.p2: Added 03/03/2009 23:55:07 by shrbasu
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
V-comments.p2: Added 03/03/2009 23:55:07 by shrbasu
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
V-comments.p2: Added 03/03/2009 23:55:07 by shrbasu
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
V-comments: Added 01/12/2009 02:35:06 by sakesing
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
V-comments: Added 01/12/2009 02:35:06 by sakesing
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
V-comments: Added 01/12/2009 02:35:06 by sakesing
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
R-comments: Modified 12/17/2008 13:07:14 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
R-comments: Modified 12/17/2008 13:07:14 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
R-comments: Modified 12/17/2008 13:07:14 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
cm_6_1_3_CommitApproval: Added 12/17/2008 13:06:55 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
cm_6_1_3_CommitApproval: Added 12/17/2008 13:06:55 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
cm_6_1_3_CommitApproval: Added 12/17/2008 13:06:55 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
M-comments: Modified 11/14/2008 09:05:39 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
M-comments: Modified 11/14/2008 09:05:39 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
M-comments: Modified 11/14/2008 09:05:39 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Release-note: Modified 11/14/2008 09:04:23 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Release-note: Modified 11/14/2008 09:04:23 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Release-note: Modified 11/14/2008 09:04:23 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
unit-test: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:26 by cms
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
unit-test: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:26 by cms
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
unit-test: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:26 by cms
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
code-review: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:21 by cms
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
code-review: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:21 by cms
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
code-review: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:21 by cms
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
static-analysis: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:16 by cms
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
static-analysis: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:16 by cms
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
static-analysis: Added 11/07/2008 18:09:16 by cms
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
EDP-resolver-comments: Added 11/06/2008 10:57:26 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
EDP-resolver-comments: Added 11/06/2008 10:57:26 by awyim
[Unwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
EDP-resolver-comments: Added 11/06/2008 10:57:26 by awyim
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_6_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:49:27 by cva
Diffs--cc_6_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:49:27 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cc_6_x_mainline&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cc_6_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:49:27 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_6_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:49:27 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_6_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:49:27 by cva
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_7_0_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:51:44 by cva
Diffs--cc_7_0_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:51:44 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cc_7_0_x_mainline&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cc_7_0_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:51:44 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_7_0_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:51:44 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_7_0_x_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 17:51:44 by cva
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 18:27:02 by cva
Diffs--cc_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 18:27:02 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cc_mainline&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cc_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 18:27:02 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 18:27:02 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cc_mainline: Added 11/18/2008 18:27:02 by cva
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_5_1_3: Added 11/07/2008 17:32:56 by cva
Diffs--cm_5_1_3: Added 11/07/2008 17:32:56 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cm_5_1_3&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cm_5_1_3: Added 11/07/2008 17:32:56 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_5_1_3: Added 11/07/2008 17:32:56 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_5_1_3: Added 11/07/2008 17:32:56 by cva
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_0_1: Added 03/10/2009 14:24:21 by cva
Diffs--cm_6_0_1: Added 03/10/2009 14:24:21 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cm_6_0_1&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cm_6_0_1: Added 03/10/2009 14:24:21 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_0_1: Added 03/10/2009 14:24:21 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_0_1: Added 03/10/2009 14:24:21 by cva
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_1_2: Added 11/18/2008 17:56:29 by cva
Diffs--cm_6_1_2: Added 11/18/2008 17:56:29 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cm_6_1_2&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cm_6_1_2: Added 11/18/2008 17:56:29 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_1_2: Added 11/18/2008 17:56:29 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_1_2: Added 11/18/2008 17:56:29 by cva
[Wrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_1_3: Added 12/17/2008 13:04:45 by cva
Diffs--cm_6_1_3: Added 12/17/2008 13:04:45 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Diffs--cm_6_1_3&ext=&type=FILE
Diffs--cm_6_1_3: Added 12/17/2008 13:04:45 by cvaCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_1_3: Added 12/17/2008 13:04:45 by cva
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Diffs--cm_6_1_3: Added 12/17/2008 13:04:45 by cva
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2: Added 11/07/2008 18:12:29 by awyim
PartCal2: Added 11/07/2008 18:12:29 by awyimCan not view this .java file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=PartCal2&ext=java&type=FILE
PartCal2: Added 11/07/2008 18:12:29 by awyimCan not view this .java file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2: Added 11/07/2008 18:12:29 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2: Added 11/07/2008 18:12:29 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609748743: Added 11/07/2008 18:14:32 by awyim
PartCal2_SR-609748743: Added 11/07/2008 18:14:32 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=PartCal2_SR-609748743&ext=out&type=FILE
PartCal2_SR-609748743: Added 11/07/2008 18:14:32 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609748743: Added 11/07/2008 18:14:32 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609748743: Added 11/07/2008 18:14:32 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609748743(afterpatch): Added 11/07/2008 18:17:37 by awyim
PartCal2_SR-609748743(afterpatch): Added 11/07/2008 18:17:37 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=PartCal2_SR-609748743(afterpatch)&ext=out&type=FILE
PartCal2_SR-609748743(afterpatch): Added 11/07/2008 18:17:37 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609748743(afterpatch): Added 11/07/2008 18:17:37 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609748743(afterpatch): Added 11/07/2008 18:17:37 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609787027: Added 11/07/2008 18:13:32 by awyim
PartCal2_SR-609787027: Added 11/07/2008 18:13:32 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=PartCal2_SR-609787027&ext=out&type=FILE
PartCal2_SR-609787027: Added 11/07/2008 18:13:32 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609787027: Added 11/07/2008 18:13:32 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2_SR-609787027: Added 11/07/2008 18:13:32 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2noset: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:52 by awyim
PartCal2noset: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:52 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=PartCal2noset&ext=out&type=FILE
PartCal2noset: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:52 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2noset: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:52 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2noset: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:52 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2set: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:33 by awyim
PartCal2set: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:33 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=PartCal2set&ext=out&type=FILE
PartCal2set: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:33 by awyimCan not view this .out file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2set: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:33 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
PartCal2set: Added 11/07/2008 18:19:33 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
RE SR 609748743   CAR 5.1.3.3000-5 error 10012 Database Error. Contact System Administrator: Added 11/03/2008 15:39:30 by awyim
RE SR 609748743   CAR 5.1.3.3000-5 error 10012 Database Error. Contact System Administrator: Added 11/03/2008 15:39:30 by awyimCan not view this .txt file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=RE SR 609748743   CAR 5.1.3.3000-5 error 10012 Database Error. Contact System Administrator&ext=txt&type=FILE
RE SR 609748743   CAR 5.1.3.3000-5 error 10012 Database Error. Contact System Administrator: Added 11/03/2008 15:39:30 by awyimCan not view this .txt file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
RE SR 609748743   CAR 5.1.3.3000-5 error 10012 Database Error. Contact System Administrator: Added 11/03/2008 15:39:30 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
RE SR 609748743   CAR 5.1.3.3000-5 error 10012 Database Error. Contact System Administrator: Added 11/03/2008 15:39:30 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Re Java 1.4.2_15 (1.4.2_15-b02) issue on Calendar class: Added 11/03/2008 15:33:48 by awyim
Re Java 1.4.2_15 (1.4.2_15-b02) issue on Calendar class: Added 11/03/2008 15:33:48 by awyimCan not view this .txt file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Re Java 1.4.2_15 (1.4.2_15-b02) issue on Calendar class&ext=txt&type=FILE
Re Java 1.4.2_15 (1.4.2_15-b02) issue on Calendar class: Added 11/03/2008 15:33:48 by awyimCan not view this .txt file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Re Java 1.4.2_15 (1.4.2_15-b02) issue on Calendar class: Added 11/03/2008 15:33:48 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Re Java 1.4.2_15 (1.4.2_15-b02) issue on Calendar class: Added 11/03/2008 15:33:48 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Re S1 609787027 - Bank Matone - CDR Failure - Can get CDRs records up to October 1 records after that get error 10021 There are no matching records: Added 11/03/2008 15:40:21 by awyim
Re S1 609787027 - Bank Matone - CDR Failure - Can get CDRs records up to October 1 records after that get error 10021 There are no matching records: Added 11/03/2008 15:40:21 by awyimCan not view this .txt file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=Re S1 609787027 - Bank Matone - CDR Failure - Can get CDRs records up to October 1 records after that get error 10021 There are no matching records&ext=txt&type=FILE
Re S1 609787027 - Bank Matone - CDR Failure - Can get CDRs records up to October 1 records after that get error 10021 There are no matching records: Added 11/03/2008 15:40:21 by awyimCan not view this .txt file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
Re S1 609787027 - Bank Matone - CDR Failure - Can get CDRs records up to October 1 records after that get error 10021 There are no matching records: Added 11/03/2008 15:40:21 by awyim
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
Re S1 609787027 - Bank Matone - CDR Failure - Can get CDRs records up to October 1 records after that get error 10021 There are no matching records: Added 11/03/2008 15:40:21 by awyim
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
car-code-review: Added 11/06/2008 16:31:53 by cms
car-code-review: Added 11/06/2008 16:31:53 by cmsCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=car-code-review&ext=&type=FILE
car-code-review: Added 11/06/2008 16:31:53 by cmsCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
car-code-review: Added 11/06/2008 16:31:53 by cms
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
car-code-review: Added 11/06/2008 16:31:53 by cms
[Uwrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
unit-test-cm_5_1_3: Added 11/06/2008 16:32:02 by cms
unit-test-cm_5_1_3: Added 11/06/2008 16:32:02 by cmsCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr_att?identifier=CSCsv47100&title=unit-test-cm_5_1_3&ext=&type=FILE
unit-test-cm_5_1_3: Added 11/06/2008 16:32:02 by cmsCan not view this . file attachment inline, please click on the following link to view the attachment.
http://
[UnWrap text] [Edit this enclosure]
unit-test-cm_5_1_3: Added 11/06/2008 16:32:02 by cms
[Wrap Text] [Edit this enclosure]
unit-test-cm_5_1_3: Added 11/06/2008 16:32:02 by cms

Similar Messages

Hi, We are running domino application in windows server 2008r2 machine, we are facing High RAM utilization issue, but there is no such process are running.

Hi, We are running domino application in windows server 2008r2 standard virtual machine, we are facing High RAM utilization issue, but there is no such process are running. Machine is running in ESXI host, most of the time it shows high RAM utilization.
We upgraded the ram from 6 to 8 GB, but still facing the issue,
Where as other VMs working fine.
Need a help to find out the issue.

Hi Sathish sampath,
You can use Resource monitor and Task Manager->Performance to monitor the RAM memory utilization, I also recommend you to download the
RAMMap to get more detailed memory information.
For more detailed information to troubleshoot this issue, please also refer to this thread:
memory performance problem. Please help.
You can also choose to post your monitor picture to help us to troubleshoot.
I holp this helps.

High Watermark issue with monitoring Service Manager 2012 R2

Hi,
Our customer has a Service Manager / Operations Manager 2012 R2 environment where SCOM will regularly generate an alarm related to High Watermark monitoring on the Service Manager data warehouse - not every day though. The alarm looks like this:
Value of 3559 is not higher than 3559
This value hasn't changed for weeks.
Having done a lot of searching we have found nothing but reference to the same recurring flow of information where people keep mentioning different values but there is no conclusion of what this might be caused by and how to solve it. The solutions
have become outdated anyway. Here is one example:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/systemcenter/en-US/889af8f3-cdf8-4d88-ae99-5dbe18d529ef/service-manager-2012-data-warehouse-high-watermark-monitor
The Service Manager Database Account in SCOM is our service account that has sysadmin in SQL. Basically, with regards to the security configuration, our customer should be covered.
To my knowledge agent-based and agentless monitoring have both been supported since SCSM 2012 SP1. Also, we have the latest management pack for Service Manager monitoring in SCOM, at the moment this should be
7.5.3079.0.
As mentioned above the value has not been changing for quite some time and nor has it in the database.
My questions are the following:
- Is there anyone that has found a solution in the meantime, especially with regards to R2?
- What is the purpose of High Watermark monitoring for the data warehouse? Why does this need to be monitored?
- We would like to understand the nature of this value better. Should it be higher each day compared to the day before?
- Could it just be overriden in SCOM?
Many thanks in advance!

Rather unexpectedly, the SCOM alarm disappeared overnight and when checking the workflow in the incident that was generated from the alarm, the incident got a Resolved status right before midnight at 23:59:58. We have a ConfigMgr connector that is scheduled
to run at 23:00 which we had disabled a day ago to check something else. But I don't think it had anything to do with this. As the alarm has disappeared from the SCOM console, we have also checked the registry values. Now, instead of "3559 3559 3559"
it says "3559 3559 3585". We have had the 3559 value since 18th July, and out of a sudden something must have been triggered, causing the value to increase. What was triggered and how, no idea... Not sure either what it means that only one of the
Three numbers have been updated with a new value. When talking about the DW jobs, using the SMlets we can see every day that, MPSync, DWMaintenance and the ETL jobs are working well. What we have had though for a longer time is that the cube processing
tends to have issues once a week, where processing won't finish and the cubes get hanging in a running state. We can fix that manually every time and often we don't even have to touch DWMaintenance or the ETL jobs, we don't need to go beyond manually
working with the cube processing jobs themselves. So it might not have an impact on the ETL jobs themselves. Occasionally we do find ourselves in a situation where we we need to play around in the SQL database and manually set the required value (can't
recall if it's 3, 6 or 7) cause we get an error in the DWMaintenance batch, but even though that's an occasional issue it's not constant and also something we can solve, and furthermore it's another known issue outside of the high watermark issue. So
we are a bit uncertain but can at least see that something works sometimes that sometimes increases the high watermark value :). In our case.

WLC 7.0.98.0 CPU high utilization

I could not find anything wrong with the show tech on WLC. Client complaints CPU high utilization. Please help!

Hi Andrew,
There are a couple of interesting things in the debug output you included, firstly there are some unsupported rates by the clients, in other words do you have some 802.11b clients trying to connect? Because I think you may have unsupported the 'b' rates on the controller. So either - ensure you have no 'b' clients or start supporting 'b' rates again (1, 2, 5.5, 11)
Secondly there some rogue AP containment going on, this can cause either your AP to have a high CPU, f there are multiple rogue APs being contained, or it may be that your own clients are being de-authenticated by another wireless network in the area - in other words, your network is under attack.
HTH
Best wishes
Mike

NAC Manager high memory issue

Hi guys, I have a CAM´s failover installed. I had seen high utilization of the ram memory in the 2 appliances. The utilization is higher than 80%. Anyone knows what is the cause for this memory use?
Also, I have a NAC Profiler integrated with these CAM's.
Regards
Gerard

Gerard,
Your system looks fine. Linux utilizes the free/unused memory to cache data, and hence the free memory reported might seem very low, but it's being used by the kernel to actively use it for caching. As/When it's needed, the kernel releases memory for the processes to use, so this is normal. If you want to look at what processes are using the most memory try this command:
ps auwwwx | awk '{print$4"\t"$11'} | sort | uniq -c | awk '{print $2" "$1" "$3}' | sort -nr
The output will show you the process with the most memory being used. For example on a test CAM here was the output of the command listed above:
14.3 1 /usr/java/jdk1.6.0_12/bin/java
0.8 1 /usr/sbin/httpd.worker
0.7 1 /usr/sbin/httpd.worker
0.6 1 /usr/sbin/httpd.worker
0.6 1 postgres:
0.5 1 postgres:
0.5 1 heartbeat:
Meaning Java was taking the most memory.
HTH,
Faisal

Intermittent high ping issues

I've been having occasional high ping issues for quite a while now. They come and go at irregular times, and I'm not sure how to resolve this. Other computers on the network are showing similar latency.
A traceroute to google's public DNS:
Traceroute to (8.8.8.8)
1 L100.LSANCA-DSL-23.verizon-gni.net (71.104.144.1) 1644 ms 1088 ms 1346 ms
2 G10-2-2823.LSANCA-LCR-08.verizon-gni.net (130.81.45.208) 886 ms 1118 ms 716 ms
3 so-7-0-1-0.LAX01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net (130.81.29.142) 1352 ms 1096 ms 1366 ms
4 0.so-2-2-0.XL4.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.121) 1026 ms 1432 ms 1246 ms
5 0.so-1-0-0.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.64.126) 550 ms 792 ms 590 ms
6 TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.22.45) 846 ms 884 ms 312 ms
7 Internet-gw.customer.alter.net (152.179.72.66) 134 ms 180 ms 444 ms
8 * (72.14.238.232) 274 ms 94 ms 712 ms
9 * (209.85.252.2) 530 ms 1114 ms 1276 ms
10 * (72.14.239.93) 1294 ms 1406 ms 1418 ms
11 * (72.14.236.200) 1586 ms 690 ms 106 ms
12 * (216.239.49.145) 106 ms 108 ms 354 ms
13 google-public-dns-a.google.com (8.8.8.8) 296 ms 104 ms 148 ms
Transceiver statistics:
Transceiver Revision:
7.2.3.0
Vendor ID Code:
4
Line Mode:
G.DMT Mode
Data Path:
Interleaved
Transceiver Information
Downstream Path
Upstream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec)
3360
736
Margin (dB)
13.5
10.0
Line Attenuation (dB)
55.0
31.0
Transmit Power (dBm)
17.8
11.8

#1 Visit http://www.giganews.com/line_info.html and post up the Traceroute the page shows, if you wish. Be aware that the final hop (bottom-most line of the trace) will contain a hop with your IP address in it. Remove that line. What I'm looking for is a line that mentions "ERX" in it's name towards the end. If for some reason the trace does not complete (two lines full of Stars), keep the trace route intact.
#2 Have you tried connecting your modem to the NID ?
I point to http://www.dslreports.com/faq/1317
#3 What is the brand and model of this DSL modem?
#4 If you have a RJ-45 WAN port router: What is the brand and model of it?
If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

Effects of High Utilization

I had a lot of bills this tax month and I am going to carry a balance for the first time ever. It's on a 0% APR card which is the only reason I'm carring a balance. Keeping the cash I could pay it off in a 3.25% APY account. My utilization was always 4-8% each month. For this month my statements cut and I had 35% utilization. The following happened to my scores FICO TU reported by Barclay 696 dropped to a 674FAKO TU by Credit Karma 684 droped to a 635 I'm going to pay all my cards off at the end of this billing cycle except for my 0 APR card. I will pay that off the following month. I'll repost my scores as they change.

degs138 wrote:
So here is where I am at. I was at 35% utilization in May with one card at 85% utilization. My score dropped to 651 at the worst. FICO score reported by Barclays. I paid off my cards in June so I was reporting a 16% utilization. My score went up to 699. Next month I will end up paying off my balances and get my utilization down to under 10%. hoping to be back in the 700s. I'll update the thread when I get my next score update. I couldn't believe I went form 709 to 651 with high utilization on one card. That is a drop of 58 points for using close to the limit on one card.I see that you have two Cap 1 cards. Take a look at their balance transfer offers. I also have a Venture and QS. Each one provides me with no fee balance transfers. Depending on when your statements close, it might be beneficial for you to transfer the balance onto one of them if there is no fee. That could movet the balance early and increase your scores when the other card reports zero. Then pay the Cap 1 down before it reports the higher balance. I have my statement closing dates spread out. This has helped me when I wanted to float something for a month. Didn't have to pay intrerest or see a score decrease.

High latency issue of an evening whilst gaming.

Hiya`s Peeps, Having recently switched to BT from Virgin (this being only my third day as a customer) as the VM service for gaming in my area (Sth Manchester) on thier 50mb package was simply not viable due to over utilisation issues, I now find myself experiencing high latency issues with my BT service.
All three evenings have been lost to me as my in game latency (World of Warcraft) has rose upto 3500ms with occasional disconnections.
Also strange was that was after the BB was first switched on I had a consistent in-game latency of 24ms home and 24ms world, this lasted around 8 hours until I experienced my first lag spike, I was disconnected and when I eventually was able to get back in game, some 20 minutes or so later, my home and world latency had changed to 42/45 (still playable ) but every 10 to 15 minutes the world latency would again rise to around 3k and above and I would again be disconnected from the server.
I do apologise for the lack of any technical detail within this post as I simply do not understand such and struggle terribly with it, I am very happy with both my speed and ping tests, both being excellent in comparison to that that I would see when using the VM service.
What I am after I guess is advice from the community on how to get the best from BT bb for playing my online game, this connection is only used for World of Warcraft and very light reading on the www, I do not have a phone connected to this line and use no wireless connections with it at all, this PC (hard wired) is the only contraption connected.
Any help and advice will be greatly appreciated, Thankyou
Les

welcome to the forum
there is a 10 day training period after your connection is activated during which time you need to leave the router connected with no manual resets. The router may reset (often) during training but that is normal as the equipment in the exchnage tries to find the best stable connection for your line.
after the training period is complete and you have a stable connection then you can get the latency changed to 'fast' if yours latency is 'interleaved' changing to fast can make your line less stable than interleaved but it is the choice of gamers
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

My Profile - Fico 8 - High Utilization

I have decided to post my profile and will update as changes are made. I have what I would call a very stable profile. My oldest card, depending on which bureau, ranges from 28.8 to 35.2 years. My average age ranges from 15.8 to 17.9 years. My two newest cards just turned 8 years on July 1st. The only inquiry I have will be 2 years old on July 26th for a phone service. On 2/25/15, I started to be more aware of account balances and did not let a single one increase since then. In the past, I have had balances go up or down but never increased my total utilization. I have one $30 paid medical collection from Oct 2012 and one 30 day late payment which will be 5 yrs on Aug 1st. EX and EQ have both of these shown and TU has neither. My accounts are as follows: 2/25/15 6/9 cards w/balances 44% utilizationBoA 95% utilChase Freedom 62%Chase Slate 37%USAA 93%Universal 24%Kohls $50.00 Scores: EQ 724 TU 734 EX 728 2/26/15Paid USAA down to 93% Scores: EQ 731 TU 734 EX 731 From 2/26/15 to 5/26/15 there were no score changes. During that time I paid the $50 balance on Kohls so had 5/9 cards reporting and brought USAA down to 89%. The Chase Freedom also went below 60% 5/26/15 5/9 cards reporting 41% utilizationBrought BoA down to 89% utilization. Scores: EQ 735 TU 744 EX 734 Sometime between 5/26/15 and 6/14/15, my EX went up to 738 with no alert triggered. From 6/23/15 to 6/26/15, my EX score went up and down each down from 738 to 742 then back down and back up. It finally settled at 742 on 6/28. I pulled the 3B on CCT on 7/3/15 and scores were as follows: Scores: EQ 735 TU 744 EX 745 My EX increased 3 points on 7/1/15 which is when my average age went to 18 yrs. EX increased 1 point on 7/12/15 which is when my two newest cards turned 8 yrs. Current Scores: EQ 735 TU 744 EX 746 Of interest is the fact that EX is 2 points higher than TU and TU doesn't have the late payment or collection. To me, this shows that the high utilization is a bigger factor than the late payment and collection. I have paid USAA down to 78% and will be running a 3B on CCT as soon as it reports, which should be in the next few days. I have also paid BoA down to 79% and will run a 3B when that reports, which should be around the 26th. I also have a heloc at 32% and a mortage at 78%. No installment loans. I will have to check my total and individual utilization to see where it's at on all of the cards. Hope this all makes sense. Will update as changes occur. I am not looking for any advice as I have a solid plan on paying off my cards and many of these are at 0%or low rates. Only one is a higher rate and I will get back to paying that at an accelerated rate now that the two high utilization cards are below 80%.

cj1132 wrote:
I have decided to post my profile and will update as changes are made. I have what I would call a very stable profile. My oldest card, depending on which bureau, ranges from 28.8 to 35.2 years. My average age ranges from 15.8 to 17.9 years. My two newest cards just turned 8 years on July 1st. The only inquiry I have will be 2 years old on July 26th for a phone service. On 2/25/15, I started to be more aware of account balances and did not let a single one increase since then. In the past, I have had balances go up or down but never increased my total utilization. I have one $30 paid medical collection from Oct 2012 and one 30 day late payment which will be 5 yrs on Aug 1st. EX and EQ have both of these shown and TU has neither. My accounts are as follows: 2/25/15 6/9 cards w/balances 44% utilization Scores: EQ 724 TU 734 EX 728 2/26/15Paid USAA down to 93% Scores: EQ 731 TU 734 EX 731 From 2/26/15 to 5/26/15 there were no score changes. During that time I paid the $50 balance on Kohls so had 5/9 cards reporting and brought USAA down to 89%. The Chase Freedom also went below 60% 5/26/15 5/9 cards reporting 41% utilizationBrought BoA down to 89% utilization. Scores: EQ 735 TU 744 EX 734 I pulled the 3B on CCT on 7/3/15 and scores were as follows: Scores: EQ 735 TU 744 EX 745 Current Scores: EQ 735 TU 744 EX 746 I have also paid BoA down to 79% and will run a 3B when that reports, which should be around the 26th. I also have a heloc at 32% and a mortage at 78%. No installment loans. I will have to check my total and individual utilization to see where it's at on all of the cards. Hope this all makes sense. Will update as changes occur. I am not looking for any advice as I have a solid plan on paying off my cards and many of these are at 0%or low rates. Only one is a higher rate and I will get back to paying that at an accelerated rate now that the two high utilization cards are below 80%. Thanks for sharing your data. Your AAoA is impressive. You may want to pay off low balance cards to get the # of cards reporting a blance down to three from five. The % of cards reporting can be a significant factor on scoring. The primary factor keeping your score down appears to be aggregate utilization percentage. A couple thresholds I have wondered about are 35% and 20%. You are approaching the 35% mark. Utilization on individual cards - at least up to 80% - has not been shown to impact Fico 8 score. It would be interesting to try and isolate impact on score associated with each of the following if your pay down schedule allows:1) Any step change in score as aggregate utilization drops2) Any step change in score associated with reducing % or # of cards reporting a balance

Voice Wireless Deployment help - High Utilization w/ no users

âWeâ have a highly dense AP deployment going on right now in our new HQ building to support wireless voice services.
Unfortunately, the AP's were hung only about 35 ft. from each other. There are about 20 AP's per floor in a three floor building. All three floors have one side without a wall. What I am seeing is that all of the AP's power down to level 8 (the lowest), and each of the AP's has around 30 Rx neighbors. If I leave all of the AP's turned on, the utilization per AP is above about 60% - and up to 100% without any clients associated to it. On the middle floor, I've tried turning off every other AP to see what effect that would have, and noticed the utilization dropped significantly (each AP below 50% utilized), but the power levels never increased on the AP's (I'm assuming because of the gazillion neighbors they see). So, I tried to manually increase the power on every other AP to power level 6. Now, of course, the utilization is really high again.
Is this typical for a voice deployment?
Should the AP's be more like 50-60 feet apart?
Any suggestions? (don't put AP's on the 2nd floor - just 1st and 3rd)?
Please see the attachment.
Thanks!!

Greetings-
First, let me say I read all of your stuff and realize that you are way more evolved than me based on your posts. I have some of your answers on file for "future reference" along with a few other folks.
Anyway - Airmagnet as a survey tool (laptop)is still kind of buggy. If I want to lock a data rate and use this as a baseline to measure with, I need it to stay there. Cognio is a wonderful utensil and the rest of Airmagnet is good for other stuff (sniffer traces, utilization, etc.)
Airmagnet surveyor...where do I start? It makes pretty pictures for customers and then when it doesn't work properly, contractors have something to point to that shows coverage.
Ekahau- if you took a survey and then went back and modified your results based on actual signal etc...you would have a very good mathematical representation of your environment. Spectralink does that. I don't like the 'survey one cell' people and then clone the green spot all over the map.
The free Cisco tool tells me the name and mac of the AP I'm associated to, when I trouble shoot. Perfect for trouble shooting. That and a ping test will perform a survey that will stand on its own once installed. Unless, I can actually have the device (phone, vocera toy)I'll use that and measure every cell back and forth and make adjustments as I go. It takes a while, but I have never had to give a paycheck back because the finished product did not perform as advertised.
As far as RRM -geeebus- even if the 'throwing the client off the network feature' were modified (ha)then you still have the '80% overlap in order to throttle down to less than 20dBm' issue. Can you think of a situation where you took one AP and placed three or four more (depending on the date of the documentation you read)at the edge of a -65dBm cell? If I have to do this to allow auto RF power 'figure outer' to work, then I don't really need RRM do I? Pico cells are further away than that.
Our facility is moving away from Cisco and we have been incorporating Meru as we go along.
It's kind of like wireless for dummies, but you can not argue with results. It's very difficult to screw up - but on the flip side - none of your troubleshooting tools work. Fortunately, I haven't needed them.
You didn't used to work for HCA in NOLA did you? Take care-

High latency issue When connected through Wifi

Hi
I have configured wlc 2504 with cisco 3600 ap .when i connected my laptop wlan on n range,i tried to ping with my network devices am getting high latency 130ms,150ms
Can anybody provide solution for this
by
Veeramani.G

Hi Veeramani,
There are actually a lot of different factors that can go into high latency type problems on your wireless deployment such as co-channel interference, interference from other wireless devices, and overall utilization on the AP/Channel. With that said, there are a number of questions that need to be answered:
1. Is this issue isolated to either the 802.11b/g 2.4Ghz, the 802.11a 5Ghz, or both bands?
2. While associated to the Access Point, in the Controller Web interface, navigate to Monitor > Access Points > 802.11a/n or 802.11b/g/n(pick the band your client is associated on) > Find the Access Point and scroll to the far right. Hover over the small blue box and select 'Detail'. Find the section labeled 'Load Statistics' and let me know what you see as the Channel Utilization percentage as well as the 'Attached Client Count'
3. Since you have a 3600, I am assuming you have CleanAir enabled on them. Navigate to Monitor > Cisco CleanAir, and see if you can pinpoint any noticeable interfering devices with high % Duty Cycle

SAP DB high utilization prob / bcoz of customized Z reports

Dear All,
We are facing sap system slow problem.
our observation as below
AL08 - pick time no of user login 226
SM12 - shows EKKO , MARC , MBEW getting lock unlock.
al08 - shows customized zreports 16 to 17 running at a time. and bcoz of that high utlization on DB.
SM66 - shows 2/3 work processes running which is taking 500 to 800 seconds at a time.
DB utilization shows below sar report.
13:01:24    %usr    %sys    %wio   %idle
13:02:24      57      12      31       0
13:03:24      58       9      33       0
13:04:24      57      10      32       1
13:05:24      59      13      27       1
13:06:24      61      10      28       1
13:07:24      58      10      30       2
13:08:24      62      10      25       2
DB utilization shows above idle % which is average withing 0,1,2
Plz help us in this regards or lets us know wayout
Most urgent.
Vijay Vadgaonkar
9371002546

Vijay - if the Z reports are being run in the background, reduce the number of background processes. This will force them to queue up and reduce resource usage.
Rob

Sun Solaris 10,Upgrade 8 or higher,having issues with VxFS,for Oracle 11gr2

A while ago, we tried doing a prototype upgrade of our main Oracle 10g db to Oracle 11gr2.
The OS on which our Oracle 10g is running is Sun Solaris 10, upgrade 4.
According to Oracle 11gr2 documentation, we need Sun Solaris 10, upgrade 6 or higher for Oracle 11g2.
The filesystem we are using is VxFS, Veritas File System.
According to our system administrator, we had issues , making Sun Solar 10, upgrade 8 , work with the VxFS filesystem.
I was wondering if anybody is running Oracle 11g2 on Sun Solaris 10 upgrade 6 or higher with VxFS file system.
At present, our Oracle db upgrade project is on a hold, because of the above issue. So your help on this , can really help us in figuring out if there is an issue between VxFS filesystem and Sun Solaris 10 OS.
Thanks
Ashish

Hi Ashish,
We are not running Veritas Cluster file system.
We tried moving our Oracle 10g r2 db on ZFS ,before doing the upgrade and performance on ZFS was worst.
ZFS has certain memory parameter setting. If you did not configure that then ZFS will eat your complete system memory.
My system administrator, has gotten a copy of Solaris 10 upgrade 9 and will try that with VxFS.
I was curious to find out if folks are running Oracle 11g on Sun Solaris 10 with VxFS file system and if they had experienced any issue.If you can Install Vxfs on Oracle Soalris 10 U9, then according to me there sholudn't be any limitations for an oracle database.
Recently i installed Oracle database 11.2.0.2 on one of my test server. I have created two databases - one on ZFS and another on ASM.
Refer:
http://appsdbaworkshop.blogspot.com/2010/10/installation-of-11202-on-oracle-solaris.html
We dont have any performance issues. We are testing it for the performance benchmarks on both of the filesystem.
If you can Install Vxfs on Oracle Soalris 10 U9, then according to me there sholudn't be any limitations for an oracle database.
Regards,
X A H E E R

Investigating disk utilization issue with performance monitor

Hello
im using windows 2008r2 server, lately the server became very slow.
i ran performance monitor with the "avg disk queue length" counter and it seems that is very high, how can i tell exactly wich process is consuming all the disk utilization?
Thanks!
Guy

Hi,
Thanks for your post.
Please refer to this article about hunting down hard disk resource hogs
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-hunt-down-hard-disk-resource-hogs/
Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

W540 True Color / High Color issue

Once in a while display setting will change from True Color (32 bit) to High Color (16 bit)
OS – Windows 7
Any idea how to overcome this one?
Thanks
Kob55
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Kob,
Welcome to Lenovo Community!
I’m sorry to hear that you are facing the issue with Display on your ThinkPad W540.
I suggest you to check updating the graphic driver, as it is related to drivers issue.
Below is the link to enter the downloads page and install Wifi driver and check accordingly, please click on "Select Product" then in "QUICK PATH" enter the MTM no. select the exact model.
http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/default.page#
Hope this helps. Do post back if issue persists!
Best regards,
Hemanth Kumar
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Cmoninit high utilization issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for