Cncltion of partial line items in the MBST is notopening the linkeddel line

Hi,
We are posting the GR with 503 mvt type with ref to delivery.  In this process when some of the line items have to be returned, we are posting MBST against those line items. To cancel / reverse the same in delivery using VL09, system (does not re-open those line items) is not allowing us to cancel partial line items. Instead the entire delivery is being cancelled.
The problem to cancel / reverse the entire delivery & material document is some of the line items are are already consumed.
When we cancel/reverse some of the line items using MBST and there by cancel the material documents, system does not allow us to cancel the particular deliveriesdoes not re-open those line items). When we cancel the entire delivery, the link between the original delivery and already consumed materials is lost.
I guess this is Standard SAP behaviour and some one would have encountered with a similar problem.
Request you to check and let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks / Sandeep

The MBST is cancellation of material documents or in other word you are cancelling the action whic were carried out earlier.
You might have noticed that when you are using MBST and entering input parameter as material documents system by default will carry all the infoermation which were there in that material documents.
I fyou weants to cancel part of material  you can do this in MIGO sereen and select the option of return delivery and saelect the line item which youw wish to send it back or return to vendor.
For partial returns you should always use MIGO, RETURN DELIVERY against MATERIAL DOCUMENT, put in the material document No. and then whichever line you want partially return, you enter the partial quantity and save the document.
Hope this clear.

Similar Messages

  • Line item Ship-to Info is not the same in Header Ship-to Party During Sales Order Creation via IDOC

    We have observed that during creation of sales order using idoc, the line item ship-to party is not the same with header ship-to. The ship-to party info in line item is equivalent to the header's sold to party. To give you a quick background, Sold to party info is given in idoc and ship to party is being determined using table EDPAR. In this specific scenario, sold to customer is not the same with ship to customer.
    Initial checking on the code leads us in function module VIEW_KUAGV. This FM populates partner details of sales order header and line item in program LVEDAF1Z
    Below is the code for Sales order Header. Notice that WE_INPUT parameter which contains Ship to party is passed as exporting parameter in FM VIEW_KUAGV. This is the reason why Ship to Party is populated correctly in sales order header but not in sales order item.
    Initially, it first set to Sold-To Party. However, if WE_INPUT is given or provided, partner details is set to Ship-To Party.
    Please advise on how we can make the ship to party info in header and line item be consistent. This is SAP Standard program which why we are hesitant to make change on the program. If there is a configuration to make this happen, kindly advise.
    Regards,
    Rommel

    Hi Jayesh,
    If I understand you correctly, you want that when creating SO from Quoatation
    the Ship to Party also follow/copy Ship to Party from Quotation, right?
    Just to confirm with you, when you creating SO reference from Quotation, you
    use copy/follow-up function, am I right?
    You can do this by setting in configuration of Copy Control (like mentioned by Hui).
    Step as follow :
    1. Go to IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
        Business Transactions
    2. Create your BAdi (Business Add-In for Copying Control), such as get Ship to
        Party value from source document and use it in current document
    3. Use this Rule you have created in BAdi (no. 2), in copy control transaction type
        IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
        Business Transactions-> Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
    4. Here you set Copying Routine for your transaction types (put name of your Badi
        created in step no. 2)
    Or alternatively, you can set it on access sequence in Partner Function
    Ship to Party in configuration. You can define access sequence the Ship
    to Party is taken from Preceeding Document -> Ship To Party
    1. Go to Partner Function access sequence :
        IMG->CRM->Basic Functions->Partner Processing->Define Access Sequence
    2. Create new access sequence with following entry :
        - Source COM_PARTNER_A (PrecedingPartner)
        - Check Mapping for Partner Being search
        - Partner Function in Source  = Ship To Party
    3. Assign this Access Sequence in you Partner Function used in Sales Order Transaction
       Type.
    Tell me if this is what you looking for
    Gun.

  • How do I grey a bubble on a line item that I don't want the user to be able to input, but leave the others active in a form?

    How do I grey a bubble on a line item that I don't want the user to be able to input, but leave the others active in a form?

    I may be missing something here, but can't you just set the item to "Read Only" in the general preferences for that item?

  • How to Close a Purchase Order line Item for GRN W/O Deleting the Line Item

    Hi,
    I want to Close a line item for Goods Receipt in a Purchase Order. How Do I do this?
    My Requirement is that the system should not allow for Goods Receipt for the Line Item.
    I know of 2 options which are difficult to Implement.
    1) I delete the Line item
    2) Put the delivery Completed Indicator - For this the system still allows for GR
    any Other way of Closing the line Item
    NS

    Hi, you can close the Line item by, doing partial GRPO, i.e if u use the Copy From option in GRPO, there comes a Draw docuemnt wizard, there you can choose one line item, and then put GRPO for that line item,
    The Wizard comes only in the Copy From option,
    Close the Line item, by right clicking on that Line item and then 'close Row'
    Edited by: Gayathri Panneerselvam on Dec 19, 2008 10:25 AM

  • How to copy line items from one expense report to the next

    I travel to the same project/destination every week so in PR05, I was able to just copy the previous expense report for the new week and edit the expense values. Now, when I book travel, the air line booking starts a new expense report entry.
    Is there a way to copy the employee-paid expenses to the GetThere-generated trip entry expense report, i.e. just copy the line items from one expense report to another that already exists. I guess that would be a merge function.

    Hi Tom,
    Here are two alternative solutions:
    Alternative 1:
    If you copy the expense report before you book the services (flight, hotel …)
    in GetThere, then the airline or hotel bookings will not start a new expense
    report but will be assigned to the copied expense report.
    Alternative 2:
    This alternative is a bit laborious.
    Shift the start date and end date of the expense
    report  that was automatically created by
    your flight booking for next week (e.g. Calendar Week (CW)  47) to the week after next week (e.g. CW 48).
    Copy the expense report of the previous week (e.g.
    46)
    Afterwards open the expense report that you
    moved to CW 48 and click on the tab strip itinerary
    Now assign the bookings (flight, hotel …) to the
    expense report of CW 47 by clicking on the button assign to existing trip
    Later delete the expense report in CW 48
    Get back to me if you have any questions concerning the alternatives outlined
    above.
    Note:
    These solution alternatives are only available for customes using HTML5 UIs.

  • Transfer vendors line items from old reconcilation account to the new one .

    Dear All
    I have changed the reconciliation account for a group of vendor i want to know if its applicable to post my previous line items that located in the old reconciliation account to the new one automatically or meaningfully  if there is a transaction that will help me to do that.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    yes you are right. The customzing TC is OBBW. For your corresponding Recon. Account you have to asign the offset Account.
    At month end you can then start the business transaction to re-classify Rec. A/P or A/R to the correct G/L Account with the mention parameter. So for your Balance Sheet reporting and for the reconcilation Sub/Ledger Main Ledeger it ok then.
    If you need further informaion just let me know.
    Regards,
    Sebastian

  • Doubts on clearing line items in profit centre and deleting the profit cent

    hello All
    We are using ecc 5.0 and new g/l, document splitting is activated. We are not using classic profit centre accounting.
    We have two accounts which has values for profit centre 1010219.
    1. 228100 which is assigned in cross company code clearing account
    2. 228200 which is assigned in cross business unit ( as a part of zero balance account) in documen splitting.
    now i want to clear all he entries for this profit centre and transfer them to another profit centre 1010403.
    I am unable to do so as everytime I try to pass cross profit centre entry, Account 228200 gets a balacing line item( as a part of zero balance). this way my profit centre trail balance will never become zero.
    can some body help me with this,,,,
    1. in classic profi centre we could use t-code ke90 just to pass a document entry in PCA, this is not possible in new g/l... is there alternative.....
    please  help....
    thanks
    sanjeev

    Hi,
    You can try Profit Center Distribution(both sender and receiver gets original account numbers) or Assessment(Assessment cost element shall be a bring in between) to transfer values from multi profit centers to one single profit center or multi profit centers. The cycle can be run on a periodical basis.
    Trust this answers to your query!

  • Each PO Line Item price should be as per the scale in contract?

    Hi
    I have a PO with 2 line items, both line items are for the same material.As I order 2 different quantities, I get 2 different prices, i.e. per line item. (As per the Scales Maintained in the contract)
    However once I save the PO, and then display the PO, the price is taken for the total quantity. Is there any way that I can have 2 different prices for both materials in the same PO?
    This behaviour has changed in the last 1 month only.
    Earlier in our SAP system each line item had different price as the scale for the ordered quantity in that line item.
    We though it could be due to Group Condition checked in the Condition Type, but that check has been in our system since long time, hence it cannot be the reason.
    Thanks in Advance!

    Yes... this is a standard behavior..
    You can do one option...
    When PO fetch the price from contract, then copy the price and enter it manually again, then PO can remember the price after save..
    Check the similar discussion PO Price update issue

  • Making the Net Price on a PO line item 0 if Free Indicator set on PO line

    Hello All,
    I have a requirement to make the Net Price on a PO line item 0 if Free Indicator (UMSON) is set on PO line.
    Please help me with an exit/badi using which this can be achieved.
    Thanks
    Indrajit

    Hi,
    Check this user exit
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_012.
    This user exit is triggered before saving the PO.
    Regards,
    Sachin M M

  • Maximum Line Items Reached In FI-  OBCY - Can the config be reversed

    Hello,
    When processing a sales order with abt 315 items, we received an error message "Maximum number of items in FI reached". As per the SAP Note 36353, we are planning to implement FI Summarization in transaction OBCY.But we are not sure if this will work or not. Could somebody please tell me If the summarization is activated, and the solution doesnt work, can it be undone? Will there be any impact in production if we undo the changes.wWll there be any negative impact, (eg invoice creation), when reverted.
    Request imputs on this.
    Regards,
    Lavanya

    Dear Lavanya,
    I don't see any particular problem in doing the summarization. There is, obviously, the side effect that You will lose the information for the fields that You will insert into the TTYPV table.
    Please read the point 2 that is very clear:
    2.  If there are items which are the same in all same account
        assignments:
        Make the following entry in the TTYPV table (transaction OBCY):
        Table   Field name
        As a consequence, items which are the same in all fields except
        value fields are totaled, that is, they are combined into a single
        item.
    I hope this helps.
    mauri

  • To split the payment document value as per the line items of the P O

    To split the payment document value as per the line items of the purchase order in the period of payment, so that the payment  amounts are measured against the Capex order assigned as account assignment in the purchase order.(Account assignment tab for the individual line item in the PO.
    Example:
    Inputs:
    Purchase Order 3100012345, line item 10 value 6000 line item 20 value 4000
    VAT @10% , account assignment for PO line item 10(Internal Order no 10001) & line item 20  Internal  Order 10002) G/ R no 5105105101 for Rs10,000.
    The I/R doc 501501501 appears as follows: (MIRO)
    Line 10: Value       Rs   6,000
            20: Value      Rs   4,000
    VAT                         Rs      600
                           Rs      400
    Total                       Rs11, 000
    Withholding Tax Rs 1,100
    The accounting entry for MIRO happens as follows: doc 2102102101
    GR/IR Dr      Rs 10,000
    VAT      Dr     Rs   1.000
    Vendor    Cr           Rs9, 900
    TDS due   Cr          Rs1, 100
    The business expects the payment report as follows:payment  doc 2001200101
    PO     Line item       Internal Order MIRO         Invoice                       Payment       Payment period  Amount
                                                                                    A/c doc number        doc number          
    3400012345     10     10001           5605605601  2102102101           2001200101       001/2009           5940
    3400012345     20     10002     5605605601     2102102101           2001200101        001/2009          3960
    Currently we are able to show the amounts as Rs 6000 for line item 10 & Rs 4000 for line item 20.
    The problems faced.
    1.     The VAT line items are auto created, hence the reference of purchase order number and line item are not available. So the VAT portion which is part of payment liability does not get reflected against the PO.(not able to show the VAT portion , when we try to show the payment amount per PO line item.)
    2.     The withholding tax is also a problem; WHT is not calculated and assigned per line item. It is calculated on the total amount of basic and VAT. Because of these reasons, the payment could not be shown properly according to the line item of the purchase order.
    3.     When part payment is made, against invoices, there is no provision to assign a payment amount against a particular line item. Further, when final payment is made in different period, the clearing document will get generated. That adds to the complexity of differentiating full payments and part payments final clearing.
    4.     When residual payment is made, a new line item is created. Here assignment of Purchase order line item against payment for residual items become a problem.
    5.     Many a times advance payments are made. Later the invoice is created and balance payment is made. In those situations, the clearing document creates one more line item and makes payment for the balance item. This adds complexity in bringing balance payment alone and to split as per the purchase order line item. The clearing document number system is multi dimensional. It creates two line items for the same item (one at the time of advance and another the time of clearing.)
    6.     When full payment is made, the payment document number and clearing document numbers are same. In cases of subsequent or partial or residual payment, the document numbers are different. Because of this, the part payment amounts are shown in the period, where the final payment and clearing are made.
    Please suggest a way to split the payment amount in the exact posting period with all the considerations given above.
    Regards
    Sundararajan
    Edited by: Sundarajan Venkatachari on Sep 30, 2009 11:04 AM

    Hi,
    See Note 301077 - User exits for the interface to accounting, although I think that there isn't this kind of option. Note 429117 - Collective note advice note SD-FI interface will be useful too.
    I think that SAP Note 1085921 - Document split perhaps will help you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Partial delivery of sales order with some line items

    Hi all,
    Please help me in the issue i want to create delivery against sales order partially for some line items of the sales order . Can any one suggest me the procedure how to do it through programing .
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi,
    You have several methods of doing same.
    Method 1
    Go to VL01N, and given your sales order number.
    Without giving the line item, just press Enter
    Now inside the delivery, you can delete unwanted line items, and you can adjust quantities under Item overview tab.
    After that do picking and PGI.
    Method 2
    Go to VL10E,
    Give your sales order number and execute.
    Mark relevant schedule lines only and press execute,
    then those line items with marked schedule lines will copied to the delivery document.
    Best regards,
    Anupa

  • How to get all the line items for each Purchasing Document ?

    Hi,
    There are multiple purchase orders (EBELN) in PSA with different line items (EBELP). But, when loaded into ODS from PSA, I am getting purcahse orders with only one Line item.
    Eg.,If the EBELN has a Record# 4000005 and has 3 line items in it (10,20, 30), I am receiving 10 or 20 or 30 Line item.
    As there are more than one line item per PO, how can I retreive all of them?
    Also, there are no conditions / routines in transfer structure and update rules.
    Please let me know

    problem solved.
    I moved the EBELP field from Data fields to Key Fields in ODS.

  • Few line items are not coming at the time of creation of delivery

    Dear Experts,
    When the user creating the delivery few line items are not picking in the delivery document
    the following checks i verified,
    Stock is available
    shpping condition is differ from sold to party and sales document
    Plants are same for all the line items
    why the few line items are not coming in the delivery document creation,
    please help me to sort out this issue
    Thanks and Best Regards,
    Muralidharan S

    Hi,
    Check below points.
    Point 1:
    When you create a delivery document, you create it for a Shipping Point.
    So whatever the line that came in to one delivery has determined same shipping point that you entered in VL01N screen.
    Others got a different shipping point and that's why it didn't come to the same delivery document.
    Shipping point determined based on below criteria
    - Shipping Condition - From customer master
    - Loading Group - Material
    - Plant  - Delivery Plant of the sales order line item
    You assign a proffered shipping point for above combination in configuration.
    If that combination is not find, those line items are not going in to the delivery.
    You can check the log of the delivery document for more information as well.
    Point 2:
    Check the line item Requested delivery date and the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
    Al  Requested delivery dates has to be on or before the  "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
    Those line items which has a date more than that will dropped in the delivery.
    Best regards,
    Anupa

  • PO Line item attachments going along with the PO o/p to Vendor!

    Hi all,
    We are on SRM 5.0 ECS SP 13.
    I had one question regarding the attachments in the PO line items.If I attach documents at the PO Line item and sent the PO o/p to vendior through e-mail,then all the attachments at the PO line item also go along with the o/p..Is this is  a  std behaviour in SRM 5.0?
    Also if i need to avoid sending of the PO line item attachments along with the PO o/p to the vendor,then I guess the "Internal" indicator for the documents need to be set rt?Is there any way the documents at the PO line item can be set as "INTERNAL"?
    I know this is achived in SRM 6.0 and above and there is an OSS note which mentions that.
    Has anybody worked on something similar?Please share your eperiences/suggestions.
    Thanks!

    HI,Rads:
         I think you should do the inhancements in this situation. I met this question in my last case .Follow is my suggestions ,maybe helpful .
        The   BADI NAME:BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF(Document Output)
      YOU should chage the code .If you do 't  send the attachment to the vendor ,you should set "Space ",jut like this :
      WHEN 'BUS2200'.
          CV_SMARTFORM = 'ZBBP_BID_INVITATION'.
          CV_SMARTFORM_MAIL = 'ZBBP_OUTPUT_COVER'.
          "exclude attachment
          CS_PARAMETERS-ATTACH_IND = SPACE.
       Then  the attachment will not been sent out ,you can try .
    Alex !
    Bestregards

Maybe you are looking for

  • Section Code for Scrap Sales -

    Dear Friends, We are handling the TCS calculation on scrap sales through withholding tax codes.  Entries are flowing perfectly to finance. But section code is not captured in the billing document. How we will get the section code in sale order or bil

  • Why can't I add some songs to a playlist?

    Hi, I'm wondering why certain songs won't drag and drop or Add To a Playlist?  There are certain songs in my music library that, when attempting to move, appear with the red circle/slash through icon instead. All of my songs have either been purchase

  • Release of Security Deposit during Invoicing

    Hi Experts, My requirement is to release Security Deposit during periodic invoicing.Can I use Event R401 for this.Also need to know how security deposit can be released through this event.Whether X_Gumb_R401 can be used for this purpose. Thanks in ad

  • How to install transport from Note?

    Hi, a Note ask to install transport RS5K908607_part01.rar to part10.rar attached with the Note. How and where to import those files? After uncompress these files,  have RS5K908607.RS5 type. Thanks for your help Marty

  • Amount Field in fitv_vc_advanced...

    Hi experts, Pls help me. I have one issue in fitv_vc_advances.Previously,once you enter the advance amount in travel request after saving the table row is  disabled. now i enhanced the wddomodifyview of fitv_vc_advances to make table fields as editab