COGI entries

Hi,
I have an entries in COGI transaction and i tried to delete it.After that i tried to check table AFFWPRO and there is no entries even i don't input anything in SE16N . Do i need to set up/activate anything so i can track those that i deleted in COGI transaction?
thanks.
Ellen

Hi Ellen,
COGI records will be available in the below Tables :
AFFW* --Goods Movements with Errors from Confirmations
AFWI --Subsequently posted goods movements for confirma
AFFWPRO -- Log of deleted AFFW entries
So you can check the deleted records of COGI in the table : AFFWPRO -- Log of deleted AFFW entries
Hope it will help you.
Regards,
radhak mk

Similar Messages

  • Deleted COGI entries

    Hi all,
    User has deleted some entries in COGI. How to track what  material has been deleted ?
    I have tried in Tables AFFW, AFFWPRO but not able to get the information.
    Kindly help
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    The other way is to have Table logging of the deleted records for which you need to implement OSS note #309050
    Standard SAP does not log the Manually deleted entries of COGI.
    If this log is required have a look at the SAP Note:309050, after implementation of the note. You can find the entries in AFFWPRO table with a update indicator as 'D'.
    Even if it cleared through background processing the entries will exist in this table with update indicator as U.
    Please refer this also,
    [Deleted COGI Entries|https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=16481188&messageID=4859630]
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    Edited by: R Brahmankar on Sep 19, 2008 9:55 AM

  • How to change the message value in COGI entry

    Hi All,
    I have two COGI records on a material for a plant and while creating those entries those were locked by another user.  So it is getting message number as 897 and so it is not displaying in the report COGI.
    Could anybody tell me, how to remove that message.
    Thanks,
    sreenivas.

    Sreenivas,
    You need to Implement the corrections mentioned in SAP Notes #325105.
    Solution as given in note
    Both incorrect goods movements and future change records for background processing of goods movements are stored in table AFFW. Error records differ from future change records by the fact that fields AFFW-MSGID and AFFW-MSGNO are filled (error ID and error number). Process requests can only be updated via reports CORUAFW0, CORUAFWP, CORUPROC or Transaction CO1P. Error records can be updated in Transaction COGI. They are also transferred to the update, provided you executed reports CORUAFWP or CORUPROC with the "Incl. incorrect goods movement" indicator set.
    In table TAFWD, you can enter specific error messages which should not be treated as an error record but as process requests.Useful candidates for such error messages are, for example, locking errors such as M3897:"The plant data of the material <XXX> is locked by the user <YYY>." You can maintain TAFWD entries by using Transaction SM31.
    AFFW records with errors which are entered in table TAFWD are no longer displayed in Transaction COGI (because they have been defined as a future change record) and can only be edited for the background processing by the programs and transactions.
    You can limit the error records to specific error messages in Transaction COGI by adding certain error messages to table TAFWD.
    Technically, the conversion of error records into process requests decreases the time and effort spent on lock management because only the respective process (background updating of goods issues and/or goods receipts) is locked during the update of process requests.However, error records are locked separately in order to prevent other users from affecting a record which is just being updated/processed.
    The following applies to postprocessing records from the repetitive manufacturing:
    As of Release 4.5B, these records can also be posted via transaction COGI (in addition to the repetitive manufacturing programs for postprocessing backlogs: Transaction MF47, report RMSERI13). However, basically they should NOT be posted using reports CORUAFWP and CORUPROC, including not with the "with incorrect goods movements" indicator set.
    Therefore, the definition of phantom errors in table TAFWDfor postprocessing records from the repetitive manufacturing has no effect. These records can not be redefined for future change records and must still be able to be postprocessed explicitly via transaction COGI.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • COGS entries

    Hi ALL
    I want to distribute the COGS amount like below
    Standard Oracle Entries generated at sales
    COGS Dr 110.00
    To Inventory A/c Cr 110.00
    Based on some %age we need to break the entries as below.
    Customization required:
    Materials Dr 50.00
    Labour Dr 40.00
    Over Head Dr 20.00
    to Inventory A/c Cr. 110.00

    Hi,
    You need to create different items for Material, Labour and Overheads and all these should be different lines in your SO. Then this seems to be possible.
    You may seek help from Cost Managment team who may help you from BOM-WIP point of view, where I feel there is some workaround for this.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • COGI entries cant able to clear for process order

    Hi All,
    I cant able to clear the entries for a process order in COGI.
    The error message for the entries are " Posting only possible in the following periods".
    Message number is M7 053.
    How to proceed?
    Kindly help me in this regard.
    Regards
    KK

    Dear,
    Go to COGI transacstino, select the error and follow this path.
    Edit-Replace-Date and then enter the current date for the document and posting date thats it your document is posted in current period.
    Please change the posting date to the current date and post it will solve your problem
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • How can I reverse the posting generated by MF47 or COGI?

    Hi,
    Using transaction MF47 I have generated a posting document. But when I ran MF47 I did it with the wrong posting date, so the accounting document generated by transaction MF47 has the wrong posting date. I would like to reverse the document generated by MF47 in order to run MF47 afterwards with the correct posting date. Is it possible? I  have try to reverse it using MF41 but I do not see the document generated by MF47 in order to reverse it.
    Thank you very much,
    Ariana

    Hi,
    It is not possible to reverse the MF47 entry or COGI entry. Once it is cleared means that's all. May be you can try with cancelling the material document and once again you can try with the backflush. But this will not create any COGI entries reversal or MF47 entries reversal.
    Regards,
    V. Suresh

  • PGI Date and COGS accounting date should be different

    Hi All,
    I have a scenario where the client wants to post the COGS account when the material reach to the Customer and on the same date wants to Invoice the Customer, this is required for the Matching Concept of Accounting so that Recognition of Cost and Revenue should be on the same Date.
    For example : Order (01-01-2012) --> Delivery (02-01-2012) - material send to Customer and it reach to the Customer on 10-01-2012 --> PGI (10-01-2012) --> Invoice (10-01-2012)
    However in India we need to update the RG1 register at the time when we remove the material from our Factory, and to update it we need to do the PGI, and as soon as we do the PGI the COGS accounts will be Debited. Whereas the material will reach to the customer, say for example, after 10 days and then the invoice will be created, so the Posting of COGS account and Revenue account will be different.
    For Example (In India) : Order (01-01-2012) --> Delivery (02-01-2012) --> PGI (02-01-2012)(NO Accounting to COGS) - material send to Customer and it reach to the Customer on 10-01-2012 --> COGS entry (10-01-2012) --> Invoice (10-01-2012)
    My Querry is:-
    1) Is it possible to achieve the above requirement that we do the PGI but do not make any accounting entry?
    2) If yes, then how can we recognise the COGS accounting on a later date, when the material reach to Customer?
    3) Is it possible through Standard SAP?
    4) If standard SAP procedure is not possible, kindly suggest the work-around and basic logic for the same.
    For any further query feel free to ask.
    Thanks and regards,
    Amitesh Anand

    Hi Ram / Karthik,
    I think VL01N screen Actual GI date can serve your purpose.
    Ram
    If I change the Actual PGI Date to a future date and do the PGI, then the material document will be posted on the given future date, and so on Current Date (actual date when the material physically move out from the factory) we can not Update the RG1 Register. RG1 Register will be updated on the Posting Date of Material Document, so this will be an Excise Audit Issue.
    Further, a report has to developed,
    > It should show the list of documents posted to the 'Deferred COGS GL and not reversed yet.
    > Based on the customer receipt, the reports should post an entry reversing 'Deferred COGS' GL to the regular 'COGS' GL
    I am looking for the same work-around without defeating any Excise Legal norms. How do we reverse the "Deferred COGS G/L" and make the posting in actual COGS G/L, and what will be its implication on Inventory Ledger and Excise Audit?
    Thanks and regards,
    Amitesh Anand

  • Alternative to COGI

    Hi PP Guys,
                     As a supporting team i dont have authorization to COGI .
    I need to check the backflush error during confirmation with COGI.
    Is there any other alternate transaction or back ground job for checking this back flush error.
    And iam unaware or back ground job if any..please provide some steps which could be help full for me
    Thanks in Advance
    suresh kanna

    Hi Suresh,
    If you just want to check what error is occurring during an order confirmation and you don't have authorization to COGI you can simply check the AFFW table. It contains the COGI entries (see the "Area", "Message Number" "Message Type" fields).
    Or you can also schedule the program CORUAFFW as a background job.
    Regards,
    Marcelo

  • COGI error, material locked on user name.

    Hello,
    I have a problem regarding COGI error.
    User was working on the COGI and system gets hanged. He restarted the system and again start working on COGI transaction.
    But there was error for one line item is "The plant data of the material XXXX is locked by the user ABC".
    I have deleted locked entries (with user name) by the transaction code SM12. But still COGI report shwos ths message.
    Thanks to give me solution for this.

    Do not delete the COGI entry, this is the very last option you should use.
    The error messages is COGI indicate the error that occurred when the automatic goods movement failed.  The error message is historical, it does not change when you reopen COGI.  Select the COGI line and then select "save", this will try to reprocess the goods movement, if the material is not locked anymore the goods movement will process, else another error will occur.

  • Items deleted froM COGI

    Dear ALL,
    CAN ANYBODY TELL ME HOW TO GET THE LIST OF DELETED ITEMS FROM COGI.I AM UNABLE TO FIND IN AFFWPRO.
    R SEHGAL

    Rakesh,
    When a COGI entry is deleted, corresponding "Goods Movement" entry is deleted.
    Standard SAP does not log the Manually deleted entries of COGI.
    <b>If this log is required have a look at the SAP Note:309050, after implementation of the note</b>. You can find the entries in AFFWPRO table with a update indicator as 'D'.
    I will not recommend this as every entry in the COGI will get logged to this table requiring enormus database space. Even if it cleared through background processing the entries will exist in this table with update indicator as U.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • COGI problem-Unusual

    HI dudes,
    Here i am getting COGI entries though our client is doing manual goods movements for the process order.The scenario is the  batches
    assigned  to the components in the process order by production people and are changed by stores people who are doing goods issue through migo later on depends on various reasons and they are keeping the batches first assigned with zero quantity in the COR2 t-code.
    Some times they are adding new materials in place of the materials copied from BOM.
    After all goods mvts if the user want to do TECO due to various reasons warning message is thrown "  post processing records exitst do you want to keep TECO "
    what might be the reason.
    Robert

    Dear,
    If any error occurs while goods movement, system records that error. This error we can resolve by certain transactions like COGI, MF46.
    Say you are doing GI/GR, but stock is not available. However system post this GI/GR quantity with error message.
    Either you can clear the COGI errors or delete the errors and then run COHV with function TECO,
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Automatic Batch determination during COGI

    Hi,
    We have implemented the batch determination function at the time of goods issue/ Backflush (at the time of Process order confirmation). Automatically batch is determining at the time of backflush in our scenario. But Automatic batch determination is not happening during COGI when we refresh even though batch/stock is available. But manual batch determination is happening when we select the batch determination tab in COGI. Why Automatic batch determination is not happening in COGI when i select the refresh button.
    Thanks & Regards,
    N. Laxman

    Hi Andreas,
    Thanks for your immediate valuable response.
    In our scenario automatic batch determination will be done during confirmation. If in case for components, stock/batch are not available leads to COGI entries. Then later course will ensure stock should be posted to clear COGI entries. Then in COGI we have to simply refresh for automatic batch determination or we have to manually do the batch determination and post to clear the entries.
    One more thing we would like to now can we run Batch determination in background as a batch job.
    Thanks & Regards,
    N. Laxman

  • COGS Vs Local Sale

    Hi All,
    While checkin a few delivery documents and their corresponding invoices, i am having a few doubts in the JE passed by the system.
    Delivery:
    Cogs---> 668043  Dr
      To FG----> 668043
    A/R
    customer--> 753120 Dr
          To   Vat Payable---> 14767
           To Local Sale----> 738353
    Just wanted to know, why there is this difference between COGS and Local sale. I know COGS entry is based on the item cost, wanted to know how the system takes the calculation of local sale because when i compare the value of COGS from 01-04-09 to 31-03-10 with that of local sale, there a huge difference. Please assist to clarify the doubt.
    Thanks,
    Joseph

    Hi,
    Lets assume an Item 'I001' with an Item Cost of Rs. 100/- and you do the delivery for the Item at Rs. 120/-.
    Following will be the Jourmal Posting after Delivery:
    Cogs---> 100 Dr
    Inventory Account----> 100 Cr
    Now you do the Invoice the customer based on the Delivery,
    Following will be the Jourmal Posting after Invoice:
    Customer---> 120 Dr
    Revenue Account----> 120 Cr
    Now when you compare the COGS account with the revenue account, there is a differnce of Rs. 20/- which is the Profit in the Sales.
    Hope this clarifies you.

  • Delivery & Invoice: Material Document Posting

    Hi MM Gurus
    Our customer doesn't like Sales Order DO posting Cost of goods sold associated with Post goods issue material document.
    Reason , It could be couple of month before invoice is due & hence COGS entry will sit in P/L without accompaning entry of Customer revenue.
    They want invoice posting should carryout all posting right from inventory/COGS/Customer Revenue/Customer payment.
    Is is possible with configuration only( No development)
    Best Regards,
    Jatin

    Dear Jatin
    You need to ask your client --if delivery happened in this month & billing can happen ONLY IN NEXT MONTH.
    During PGI-if Your Books of Account need to be handled in  a manner,
    to plan your Costings,followed by other calculations.
    Business cannot postpone their COGS planning based on the Customer invoice date.
    i will ask one Question: During PGI--stock accounts need to credited to have a clear-cut idea on Exact inventory--other wise Business cannot plan costings,Affects all other customers.
    I think you need to educate the client or Inform us what was the exact problem..
    Phanikumar

  • Block Production Order Confirmation

    Hi Team,
    I am having below scenario.
    Today i have created the production order & performed the availability check. The availability check is passed & all the required materials are available in the storage location Z001. Now the Order status is : REL & MACM.
    Note: I have two BOM items namely A1 & A2. In storage location Z001, i have stock of A1 & A2 as 10 & 20 respectively.
    But due to some emergency reasons, the stock of A1 (10 qty) is transferred from Z001 to Z002.
    Now i am again performing the availability check, now i am getting MSPT status since the stock of A1 is ZERO in Z001.
    Now i would like to control the confirmation in CO15 that, if the order status is MSPT, the confirmation should not be posted.
    The system status for MSPT is "I0004". I am searching for relevant business transaction for "Confirmation"in BS22 against the status "I0004". I have found many business transactions like "AM21 - Confirm", CU02-Partially Confirm CU", "CU03 - Confirm CU". etc. But i could not able to understand the correct business transaction for "Confirmation" & "Partial Confirmation".
    Q1: Can anyone help me to identify the correct business transaction for "Confirmation" & "Partial Confirmation" in BS22?
    Q2: While executing the BAPI "BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR", the confirmation to be terminated if the order status is MSPT. Is this possible?
    Note: I have activated the check box "Termination of Incorrect Goods Movements" in OPK4?
    Q3: In OPK4, i have noticed the check box "Termination of Incorrect actual costs". In what situation, i need to activate this check box?
    Thanks

    Hi
    The system status for CNF is I0009 and for PCNF is I0010.
    The confirmation through  standard BAPI will result in COGI entries and it wont check the OPK4N settings, these settings are valid for single screen confirmation only CO11N,  but  with Good programmer you can write down you code and the confirmation will take as per your requirement through the BAPI
    Regards,
    Anupam Sharma
    Message was edited by: Anupam Sharma

Maybe you are looking for