Collaboration madness

Hello all,
I am desparately seeking a solution to my collaboration madness (help save my hair!).
I am producing documents that need to be reviewed by SMEs. As is standard for reviewing documentation, they will need to mark up and add comments within the documentation. Also typical, these SMEs do not have any of the CC tools (and are mainly using Linux based OSs).
I need a way of providing a OS agnostic method of sharing documents for review. What is available to me in CC?
I know the Adobe Acrobat subscription will allow what I require with PDF documentation; however, from what I recall, this tool comes with a fairly expensive subscription.
What have I tried?
My company has a Google Apps subscription and I have tried converting a PDF to Google Docs *BUT* unfortunately PDF to Google Docs conversion has a 2MB limit (huh?) and only a small portion of my document gets converted. Grrr...
Your help is greatly appreciated,
Shawn

Hi
enable WAS server for SSl .It will work .There are configuration to be done at WAS level using visual admin tool and then server has to be restarted.hope This will help you .please do not forget to give points
with regards
subrato kundu

Similar Messages

  • File Transfers in Chat Rooms?

    We're running OS X Server 10.8.3. Is there any known way to have the ability to transfer files inside of a Chat Room? I find it mind-numbing that this isn't possible. We cannot use the chat room feature at all without this. Does anyone know of a way to get it to work or are we stuck now having to look for a third party chat room product?
    thanks,
    Ben

    I'm not sure either of you understood my question. I'll try to make it more clear, in case anyone else has any ideas or feedback that could help:
    We are using Mac OS X Server, 10.8.3. We are using the "Messages Server" service. When using a "persistent chat room" -- one of the supposed features of OS X Server. From http://www.apple.com/osx/server/features/#communication ...
    "Messages Server brings the collaborative power of instant messaging to your organization. Now workgroups can transfer files securely, share group messages, conduct audio conferences, even broadcast a presentation, movie, or photo slideshow to other Messages users running OS X."
    And from the OS X Server product overview PDF, pg. 18...
    Group Collaboration Made Easy
    Messages Server works with OS X to automatically populate users’ buddy lists with
    members of the groups to which they belong, so it’s easy for them to start communicating. And thanks to store-and-forward functionality, Messages Server allows users
    to send messages to buddies who are online, combining the advantages of instant
    messaging and email.
    Messages users can request Messages Server to create and host a persistent chat
    room. Perfect for virtual-team scenarios, project-specific discussions, and real-time,
    blow-by-blow updates, the chat room allows individuals to join at any time, leave
    when they need to—even log out and shut down—and still come back to review
    all communications from the time the chat room opened.
    Here's the problem I'm perplexed by:
    File transfers work just fine when doing 1-to-1 chats. However, in a "Chat Room", they do not work at all.
    I realize that this may be "just how it is" but I was wondering if anyone had any knowledge of a way to make it possible. Seems like a ridiculous limitation, and one that makes the entire (otherwise useful) feature of "persistent chat rooms" all but moot for us.
    thanks,
    Ben

  • Setup of collaboration on external drive

    Hi, I've been using os x since 10.0, but a newbie on server.
    As an apple fan I've been drawn to the flame of thinking I could do more because apple makes it easy. So my interest in getting web side collaboration to support small groups with wikis, blogs, mail and calendar. I'm also interested in web apps.
    My first install of 10.5 server was Standard and seemed to work, but...
    When I got the mini I also purchased a FireWire external 500GB drive to house accumulated data and web development; the mini HD is small. I want the web stuff and new work housed on the external.
    For this to work, Apple support said I need to go to Advanced configuration. I've read most of the entries in this forum on 10.5 server and can't thank you all enough for teaching me what to look for and how to read the docs. I have DNS working now fwd/back, Open Directory Master with Kerberos and LDAP directory running.
    Set up the Web service with data to point to the external volume named ext/Library/Collaboration. Set up users and groups. Set up the website on the external under /Library/Webserver/domain. The static stuff works.
    I set up the site domain to homepage on the external. I set up web service on the site to provide group (not user) wikis, blogs, maillist and calendar. I'm supporting small groups and don't need the individual user blogs. Groups with members was set up with Workgroup Manager and the groups enabled to use the domain for wikis, blogs, maillist and calendar. The groups are sticky in Server Admin and the correct domain is selected in Workgroup Manager. But no folders are created on the external in the /Library/Collaboration folder. When the group is enabled I should see something like Groups, Archived Groups and User folders created on the external drive. This is not happening. They aren't going to the startup drive either. Interestingly, since I haven't set up iCal service yet, there is a Documents folder created under /Library/Calendar/ folder on the startup drive. Which says something is happening. The logs indicate the system couldn't write to the external.
    So I set up a share point to the external drive and even added the Everyone group to read&write just to see where the hang up was. No change. I thought this was a permissions issue. After trying different permission arrangements using Teamserver and Directory Admin I restarted and managed to lockout all logins including root.
    As for trying server software, I don't think this stuff can be called user friendly yet.
    I'm hoping someone has accomplished this small feat and can point me in the right direction.
    Thanks,

    Whoopie -
    Yesterday I was so frustrated. I got my dose of castor oil when for the second time I heard from apple support techs "If you haven't been to school and don't have prior experience 'Advanced Mode' is way over your head". OK, but they weren't willing to give my money back either -- so push on.
    With tech support I set up a test group with full mail, calendar and web services. DNS is still confusing because it resolves inside and outside my NAT but doesn't locate the domain only the server. There is no domain A record. A server A record only.
    Anyway, I used ditto to move the /Library/Collaboration folders and /Library/CalendarServer folder to the external drive. As I found out, the ditto command preserves resource forks and permissions.
    i.e. sudo ditto -rsrcFork /Library/Collaboration /Volumes/ext_HD
    just dumped the wiki folders and similarly the calendar documents folder onto the ext_HD (name of external drive) and they show up with the red circled minus sign.
    I stopped the web, ical and mail services. Changed the data store locations for web service to /Volumes/ext_HD using the browse tool, and saved, then set the ical data store to the /Volumes/ext_HD/Documents folder and saved.
    Started up mail, ical and web services one at a time. Had to use View and Refresh on the web service.
    Reset the WGM web service and mail to the testgroup and voila!.
    My wikis and group calendar came up and mail was passed successfully. I went to the file sharing panel browsing the ext_HD and there was a new item in the calendar and separately in the weblog folders after I made these through the web site.
    I then set up a second group and nothing happened. I added the new group to the webservice for the site panel. I added a previous user to the new group and logged into the wiki with that, made a blog entry and logged out. The new group folder then showed up on the ext_HD and in the calendar/Documents folder on the external drive.
    Mail and maillist also found the group wiki. Calendar events were stored as well.
    Boy am I happy.
    I hope this hasn't bored anyone.
    Harry

  • Help required in exploring collaboration feature

    Hi All,
    I am a newbie in oracle BPM, wanted to explore collaboration feature in oracle soa suite 11.1.1.7 version.
    followed the document as on http://www.oracle.com/us/products/oracle-bpm-11g-report11117-1908473.pdf
    I need help in exploring the feature as per the screenshot on page no 12 on the above document.
    feature: the left dashlet where written: *"Members, James Cooper Participant ..."*.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Siva,
    Firstly get the complete details of the collabration ,what it does ,why it is used and how the configurations are made ,i am provding you the maximum information hope it would help you any more queries get back with reply.
    Collaboration Launch Pad (CLP) allows portal users to manage their contacts and launch services for collaboration. Users use a link in the tool area of the masthead to launch the CLP,then activate clp and Activate the technical component Real-Time Collaboration (RTC).
    RTC provide the standard services instant messaging and application sharing.
    With these technical components, you also activate the Real-Time Messaging Framework (RTMF). In the portal, the RTMF is the technical infrastructure for transferring real-time event between servers and clients.
    so, After installing the Collaboration component in SAP NetWeaver, you need to complete a number of configuration steps in order to fully implement Real-Time Collaboration (RTC) in the portal. RTC provides both application sharing and instant messaging in the portal.
    for the steps You can look into these steps which would help you :
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/07/3d9b40e8192a54e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/07/3d9b40e8192a54e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    Thanks&Regards,
    Aswinchandra Girmaji

  • Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment with BE7K and VMWare license

    Hello, I am looking for some help trying to figure out if Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment can be used to upgrade our existing 7.1.5 cluster.  From what I have read there is a API problem with the VMWare license that comes with the BE7K.  But after reviewing the BOM/quote from my VAR it lists the foundation license which based of the release notes is supported.
    UCSS-U-VMW-FND-5-1
    UCSS Cisco UC Virt. Foundation  Five Year - 1 server
    Has anybody out there had expericne with PCD and BE7K'?
    This is from release notes of PCD
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/10_5_1/CUCM_BK_P139675A_00_pcd-rns-1051/CUCM_BK_P139675A_00_pcd-rns-1051_chapter_010.html
    Search for “Business Edition 7000” and it will state it is not supported with PCD.  It is because the licenses that the BE 6k and 7K are shipped with don’t enable certain VMware APIs that PCD needs.
    “Virtualization Software License Compatibility
    Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment is not compatible with all license types of VMware vSphere ESXi, as some licenses do not enable required VMware APIs.
    The following are compatible with Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment:
    Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation (appears as "Foundation Edition" in vSphere Client)
    VMware vSphere Standard Edition, Enterprise Edition, or Enterprise Plus Edition
    Evaluation mode license
    The following are not compatible with Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment:
    Cisco UC Virtualization Hypervisor (appears as "Hypervisor Edition" in vSphere Client)-preloaded on Cisco Business Edition 6000 and Business Edition 7000
    VMware vSphere Hypervisor Edition
    Any help would be appreacted.
    JP

    Thanks Jamie for repsonding, we haven't made any purchase's yet but I wanted to ensure we are purchasing a solution that won't lead to a lot of frustration.  We only have 1000 phones so we are pretty small and the BE7K seems to be a good fit and value.
    Cheers,

  • Sort order of documents in a collaboration  room

    hi everybody
    i have a collaboration room where documents are stored in it. the sort order of my folders in the collaboration room is determined by the names of the folders.
    now there are many folders in folders and at the bottom-level-folder there are the documents stored. these documents are sorted by the names of the documents too.
    now my problem:
    the sorting of the folders by name is OK, but at the bottom-level in the bottom-level-folder i need the documents sorted by "modified"-date (for all users). How can i easy made this change? (hope not to make a new layout set...:-() can you please post a guidance?
    thank you for your help!
    flo

    thank you for your feedbacks...
    the suggested solutions are not bad but i have this problem:
    in the collaboration room we use two layout sets, one for the users with write-permission (layout set FileExplorer) and one for the users with read-permissions (layout set AnonymExplorer).
    in the collaboration room the folder-structure for documents should be sorted by folder-name but in the bottom-level-folders, the documents should be sortet by modified-date.
    now the problem is, that i can assign only one layout set to a folder, that would mean, that the users with the read- and write-permissions both would have the same view...
    do you see another solution?
    please help!
    thank you
    flo
    Message was edited by: Florian Wittwer
    Message was edited by: Florian Wittwer

  • Allow collaboration on un-published / checked-in project on Project Server 2013 and Project Online

    Hi All,
    Before a project is officially published specific resources in the project team need to be able to "collaborate" i.e. create tasks, change dates, etc. before the project is published. The complication is that we need this collaboration to happen
    on un-published / checked-in versions of the schedule. For example, the primary Project Manager adds tasks and makes changes to a published version of the schedule, saves and checks-in the project (doesn't publish), tells a secondary PM to go in and review
    the changes, the secondary PM should be able to see the changes the primary PM made, even though the schedule changes weren't published, be able to check-out the schedule, review what the primary PM did, make some more changes, save and check-in the schedule
    (again, without publishing it), and tell the primary PM to review. Then the primary PM could go, check-out the schedule, review it, save it, publish it, and check it in.
    Can Project Server 2013 or Project Online allow to do this? I looked into permissions and Server settings but I couldn't find anything that would indicate it is possible.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    George

    Hi George,
    If you perform some tests, you'll see that even from PWA, the schedule can only be edited from the draft table. When you access the schedule in read only (as a team member for example), you see the published version, but as soon as you edit it (after clicking
    on the edit button assuming you have the appropriate permission), you'll open and update the draft version of the project.
    As far as I can remember (I don't have it in front of me now), you have a "line" in the schedule PDP (don't know how to call it in english) that will tell you if you are accessing either the draft or the publish version.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

  • Collaborative planning - Need insight

    Planning Guru,
    Need some insight on collaborative planning?
    Let us take an example of supplier collaboration. Using CP, I can create replenishment order. Supplier can view it also. But how these PO will be translated into some sort of sales orders? I can replenish materials using min-max also. The end result of both process are Req/PO. After that, both systems are unable to translate supplier demand into supply.
    Whether CP is meant to just publish supply and demand data to supplier and supplier can create ASN? I can create ASN in CP, but isupplier can also create ASN.
    May be this is a wrong question but don't you think now a days companies operate in more automated and integrated mode. Nobody has manpower to go and review the planned orders. Usually business rules are set and things are driving in automated fashion....
    Just wanted to know following:
    1) How are you using CP and in which business environment?
    2) If you are using CP, how are you downloading data from CP to supplier system? Whether you use some customization?
    3) Forecast, PO etc can be sent via different mechanism, take an example excel also, what extra benefits we have using CP?
    I am exploring supplier collaboration for an aviation company. One specific supplier replenishes parts from our locations. We can use min-max for replenishment very easily. We can also use ASCP to recommend and release ‘planned orders’ specific to this supplier. I need to know what benefit we will get using CP in this case? Don’t you think after using CP also, we will end up writing custom code to integrate supplier system and Oracle to manage our purchase orders and supplier’s Sales orders.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Vikrant

    Hi Rajkumar,
    A) The following are the settings required for collaborative planning
    1) User settings with authorisation object C_APO_CLPU
    2) Use transaction /SAPAPO/CLPSDP_USER for settings related to
    collaborative planning
    3) The prerequisites are planning area, planning book for
    collaborative to be maintained
    4) Web browser access settings needs to be maintained
    5) collaborative planning workflow are to be made
    6) /SAPAPO/CLP_SETTINGS - Collaboration Partners to be done
    7) Regarding no of customers, it depends upon the internet
    transaction server.  I suggest you can check with SAP on this
    by raising a OSS message
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • Cisco Prime Collaboration Usage

    Hi,
    Many Asia costumers complain it is very difficult to maintain the Cisco Collaboration system.
    So we are considering the Cisco Prime Collaboration system, see which can help or not.
    I have few questions about the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning (CPCP) for SME customer / Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance (CPCA) for Big customer.
    1. CPCP Standard version is free? one cluster? no adv. features? What is the adv. features on adv. versions?
    2. I see the CPCP will deploy the new configurations into the CM clusters, that is fine on the new CM, but the existing CM will access the CPCP push into new configurations? Any impacts will happen on delopying the new CPCP into the existing CM?
    3. CPCA lic. counted by every end devices, that is really expensive. Any cost effective methods to deploy the CPCA?
    4. If we want to monitor the TP endpoints or DX video phones, I have to plug the lan to the 37XX or above switches? 29XX cannot? 
    Medianet-Capable Devices
    Feature
    Routers
    Switches
    Cisco IOS®Software Release Supported
    Mediatrace 1.0
    Cisco 1800, 2800, 2900, 3800, 3900 Integrated Services Routers
    Cisco Catalyst® 3560E, Catalyst 3560X, 
    Catalyst 3750, 
    Catalyst 3750-Metro (only 12.2SE),
    Catalyst 3750E, and
    Catalyst 3750X
    12.2SE
    15.0SE
    15.1T
    15.1M
    IP service-level agreement (SLA) video operation
    Routers will be supported soon. Please check the feature navigator as mentioned below
    Cisco Catalyst 3560E, Catalyst 3560X, Catalyst 3750, Catalyst 3750E, and Catalyst 3750X
    12.2SE
    15.0SE

    Hi,
    Been out of the office but see that no one has yet responded to this. I can answer some of the questions.
    1. CPCP Standard version is free?
    CUCM 10+ users are entitled to use the Standard version.
     one cluster?
    Yes
     no adv. features?
    Not missing a lot, especially for smaller one cluster networks.
    What is the adv. features on adv. versions?
    The Standard and Advanced versions are pretty much the same except for the following:
    Advanced can handle multi-cluster networks
    Advanced allows administrator delegation. This means that different administrators can be assigned to different groups of end-users.
    Standard does not have advanced workflows (Approver, MAC assigner, Shipper and Receiver).
    Advanced provides a northbound API for integration to another network management application, HR system or custom UI.
    2. I see the CPCP will deploy the new configurations into the CM clusters, that is fine on the new CM, but the existing CM will access the CPCP push into new configurations?
    CPCP can push configurations to new or existing clusters. Changes made directly on a cluster will be pulled back to PCP so they stay in sync.
    Any impacts will happen on deploying the new CPCP into the existing CM?
    CPCP was designed to add to a UC network at any time. When added to an existing network, CPCP can use it's reverse sync process to import users and CM configurations.
    3. CPCA lic. counted by every end devices, that is really expensive.
    List price may appear really expensive but you need to work with a sales person to determine the actual price. There is also the option to have an enterprise license agreement which might be more cost effective if this is for a Big Customer.
    Any cost effective methods to deploy the CPCA?
    ELA as mentioned above, or use the free standard version.  It the standard version provides enough functionality, it might be an option.  Cost effective may be hard to define.  If the product significantly lowers the cost to operate the network (faster fault resolution, less administrators, usage reports, resource utilization savings, etc.) it would be cost effective.  I don't know how big the Big Customer is or what/how many endpoints/devices/apps are in the network so I cannot provide any better advice.
    I am not sure how to answer the last question so will leave it for a TME or other expert on CPCA.  It looks like a medianet question. CPCA is not completely dependent on medianet to monitor TP environments and can provide some call trace and performance without it.  This is best answered by someone on the Assurance PM/TME team.
    Regards

  • Error in Real Time Collaboration

    Hi
    We got an issue in our project.
    When ever any user log's into Portal it is giving a message called
    With title Real-Time Collaboration(You are logged to the same portal already. Real-time collaboration capabilities will not be available in the current portal session until you terminate the other session and then restart this one by refreshing the browser or logging on again.)
    We are using EP6 SP13
    And we are having 2000 Portal users every one is getting this error in portal.
    And After restarting the Server we are not getting that error. And again after a month it again starts.
    Thanking you in advance for help
    From
    Srikanth

    Hi Srikanth,
    We also faced the same error and it was because the same users have already logged into the portal once or more than once.
    The capabilities of real time collaboration feature might not work if an user has made multiple login to the portal using same id.
    Hope the issue should be same with you.
    With regards
    Deepa
    Plz reward points for helpful answers.

  • Collaborative tools (wiki + forum)  : will we be able to use our own

    Hi,
    When collaborative tools will be included in Webcenter, will I be able to use my own instead ? My company uses Confluence as a wiki. any possibility to plug confluence to webcenter and any other choices we would have made (forum ...).
    Thanks.

    What do you mean with plugging Confluence to WebCenter? The question is quite abstract.
    The OWCS Wiki and Forum are not mandadory. You can use whatever you want. The ability to integrate any web application shall be evaluated in conjunction with the desired usability and technical capabilities of the application. How do you want to let the user handle your Wiki in your WebCenter app and how will your Wiki be capable to support this? For instance, if you want to embed your Wiki in you web page through portlets you should check whether your Wiki will support portlets. If not you should check whether you can develop your own portlets. This implies that you are able to retrieve the desired data for the portlet from the Wiki through an API or so. Plugging in can be anything from a simple hyperlink through portlets up to Data Controls
    To shorten the answer: you should check that with your Wiki, not with WebCenter. Oracle Webcenter is capable of consuming WSRP/JSR168 portlets or Oracle JPDK portlets. Also you can plug you data controls in to fetch data from you repository to the model layer of your WebCenter application.

  • Can't add to collaborative playlist

    I am trying to use the collaborative playlist feature for the first time. I made my playlist collaborative and sent the link to a freind. When she clicks on the link she goes to a URL on play.spotify.com and she can see the playlist but can't add to it. 
    She then made a playlist, made it collaborative and sent me her link. The same thing happens. I click the link, go to a play.spotify.com URL but can't figure out how to add to her playlist. 
    When I open my spotify app, I can not figure out how to see the collaborative playlist she sent me. 
    I am a premium user, signed in with facebook
    she is a free user, signed in withou facebook
    Plese hlep! We need to finish this playlist inthe next few days!
    Thank you. 

    Hey  -- welcome to the Community!
    If it's the first time you're using collaborative playlists, you might not know that you have to be Following it to be able to add it. As soon as you're Following it, you should be able to add tracks to it as you do any other playlist.
    If it's still not working though, try it in the desktop app, either by changing the URl to "open.spotify.com" rather than "play.spotify.com" in the address bar, or head into the web player settings and change links to open automatically in the desktop app.
    Hope that helps!

  • Lccs.swc error: Not displaying any rtc collaboration GUI components

    I'm using flex builder 4.6 for the first time and my intention is to try out a sample video conferencing application. I've succesfully made a connection to the lccs room console but I have not been able to display any components on the default state (There are two states, the login state and the default state). While the login state shows the login field (created using spark components) the default state shows nothing but a blank window (these are supposed to initiate video chat through a webcam and are created using rtc components). No matter what I do nothing is displayed on this window and I have tried running this app on the web, mobile and desktop to no avail. The only error that appears is this (wrt the design view):
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder 4.6\eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.lccs\libs\player10.3\lccs.swc- not respondingSWC file failed to load. Any component dependent on this SWC file will not be displayed in the Design Mode.The SWC may have failed to load because of:
    *  Incompatible definitions caused by usage of a different SDK version
    *  Missing referred class definitions
    I'm running adobe flash player 11.1 and the latest version of air. I tried installing flash player 10.3 but that didn't help any. I don't understand why all the tutorials online seem to list this as a sample easy flex application meanwhile no one in any forums have encountered this situation. Is lccs.swc currently deprecated or something? Does this have anything to do with a departure from flash or flex development for adobe? None of the online tutorials have been updated to reflect flex builder 4.6 development (the videos on the lccs page are for flex builder 3 or at the most 4). Is there a lccs.swc plugin currently available for 11.1?
    Unless I'm doing something wrong, but following the tutorials verbatim does not seem to indicate otherwise..please help!!!
    here's my code:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <s:WindowedApplication xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                           xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                           xmlns:rtc="http://ns.adobe.com/rtc" currentState="logon" fontSize="18" xmlns:authentication="com.adobe.rtc.authentication.*">
        <fx:Script>
            [Bindable] private var roomURL:String = "https://collaboration.adobelivecycle.com/eguaoje/myfirstroom";
            protected function connect():void {
                auth.userName = userName.text;
                currentState = "default";
                session.login();
        </fx:Script>
        <s:states>
            <s:State name="logon"/>
            <s:State name="default"/>
        </s:states>
        <fx:Declarations>
            <authentication:AdobeHSAuthenticator id="auth"/>   
        </fx:Declarations>
        <s:TextInput id="userName" includeIn="logon" top="200" horizontalCenter="0"/>
        <s:Button label="Connect" click="connect()" includeIn="logon" top="250" horizontalCenter="0" height="50" width="150"/>
        <rtc:ConnectSessionContainer id="session" roomURL="{roomURL}" authenticator="{auth}" autoLogin="false" width="100%" height="100%" includeIn="default">
            <rtc:WebCamera top="10" left="10" bottom="10" right="10"/>
        </rtc:ConnectSessionContainer>
    </s:WindowedApplication>

    I just tried using flex builder sdk 4.5.1 but the problem remains. It seems i'll have to somehow revert to sdk 4.0  or 4.1 (the most consistent one in the examples) to resolve the issue. However using it with flex builder 4.6 seems to bring a lot of errors at runtime. Do you know how I can get 4.0 sdk working with flexbuilder 4.6 or with eclipse? Is design mode broken with 4.0?

  • Link for Launching Collaboration Launch Pad

    Hello,
    At the moment I configure the Minimal Basic Configuration for Collaboration. I want to activate the link for launching the Collaboration Launch Pad. I did all steps but I don't find the link. I know that a link have to be in masthead.
    Does this mean that there should be "Collaboration" near "Content Administration", "Content Management" and so on? I don't see a link "Collaboration". What I could do?
    Kind regards and thanks in advance
    Susanne Baumann

    Hi Susanne,
    If you have changed your framework page, then you should make that
    change there also.Because as per the master rules, you will be using
    a specific framework page for your id. That can be verified in ur master rules.
    So if that is the framework which  you have customised , then this change will have to be made there also.
    Hope its fine now.
    Regards
    Vineeth

  • File Sharing/Collaborating Question

    I need to understand better how to collaborate as a team on documents.  Situation #1:  I shared a document with a colleague--marked the document "limited access."  The recipient said a password was requred to opent it.  I don't recall an option to provide a password.  Is the password my universal acrobat password, where all documents in my file can be viewed?
    Situation #2:  I shared a different document, different colleague.  When she made edits and went to re-load, she said a password was required.  Same question, do I need to be providing my acrobat password to people I am sharing/collaborating with on documents?
    Situation #3:  During a conference call where participants were screen sharing, a colleague successfully uploaded a revised document to the one we started with.  His document does not appear in my files, in my account.  We definitely viewed it, shared it, online.
    Any coaching and help would be appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Thanks for writing. We’re happy to hear that you’re trying out Buzzword.
    Here’s a little information that may help. There are 3 roles in Buzzword:  author/co-author, reviewer and reader. Authors and co-authors can write, edit and share the document with others. Reviewers can add comments to the document, but cannot share the document further. And readers can view the document, but cannot leave comments or share the document further. (Please see the online Help for more details about each role.)
    The roles are intended to help you manage how different people interact with the document. And, you can change the roles of each person over the lifetime of the document. For example, you may want to give a small group co-author rights to get the document started, and allow writing and editing. As you move through the cycle of the document, you may want to add people as reviewers, and perhaps even change a few co-authors to reviewers as you begin to lock down the content. And finally, when the document is complete, you can then change everyone to a reader. This gives them access to the final document but does not allow them to change the document. This is one way of working that’s been successful with a number of our users.
    In regards to situations #1 and #2 - we do require that individuals have an Acrobat.com account in order to work on a document – even adding comments. There is an option for reading only. You can “Share with a wider audience” - which allows people to read the document without signing in to Buzzword. However, if they want to comment, they will need an account and sign in. In this situation, you would set sharing to the “wider audience” and then copy the URL and send it to those you want to read the document.
    My best guess as to what happened with question #3 is that the individual downloaded the file and made the changes offline, not in Buzzword. This would cause you not to be able to view the changes that had been made in your file.
    Hope this helps! Again, thank you for giving Buzzword a try.
    Michelle

Maybe you are looking for