Color picker - "color field" and "current color" differences

Can someone explain why this is happening.
The current color box is displaying a different color to what is selected in the color field... if i click ok it goes with the color in the color field. I just noticed this today and it doesn't do it in Photoshop even though they both have the same color profiles.
http://expansiondesign.com/images/illustrator%20color%20picker.png
Cheers
Barton

I'm not sure if I understand the text format issue you are
having. It sounds like you want to have text that is already
formatted change to another format.
If this is the case you just need to set the new text format
whenever the time comes to do so.
If you have...
var format1:TextFormat = new TextFormat();
format1.font = "arial";
format1.size = 14;
var format2:TextFormat = new TextFormat();
format2.font = "papyrus";
format2.size = 28;
then you can switch between the two formats as needed...
tField.setTextFormat(format1);
tField.setTextFormat(format2);
so long as those formats are within scope of their being
called.

Similar Messages

Find datetime difference between two fields and add the difference to the current datetime.

Hi all,
First I need to find the difference between the two date times fields (D1 and D2) and than add the diffence between them to the curent datetime to generate new datetime field (D3).
D1
D2
2013-05-09 12:12:57.000              2013-05-09 12:12:57.000
2013-05-10 12:12:57.000              2013-05-09 5:10:01.000
2013-05-09 9:13:27.000                2013-05-11 11:00:21.000
Thanks!

Hey,
You can try this
SELECT DATEDIFF(Day, D1, D2) as Date_Diff from Table_3
Replace day with
other units you want to get the difference in, like second, minute etc.

Dynamic Selection of fields and those 0uputs using ABAP Programming

Dear All
I have a requirement I searched but couldn't able to find the closest one,
kindly help me in this...
I have 100 fields in one text file which is placed in AL11 server....
Requirement is
User should be able to run a report , by selecting any of the listed field and see any difference between the data in 2 text fields of diff dates...
Ex: in 100 fields Employee Group and Dept no..2 fields he selects in selection-screen output and selects 2 text files from AL11 Server...
if he executes report should produce only those employees who has difference in Employee Subgroup and dept no changes...
writing the logic is not a big deal...
but 2 challenges
1) Empno , empname are fixed but remaining field columns should be what ever user selects. on the selection-screen
2) How to populate fields on selection-screen??
Regards
Sas

Hi Srinivas,
Drop down is to select one field at a time,
I need to select as many as user want to see the difference.......
Regards
Satish.v

JPEG color difference between Adobe Raw and Microsoft Image Viewer

When I calibrate my monitor or use the monitors ICC file which came with the Monitor, there is a color difference between Camera Raw image and the JPEG I save from Camera Raw, displayed in Microsoft Image Viewer.
However, if I make my ICC file for the system to be SRGB Color Space Profile, and go through the same conversion, the JPEG image created and viewed in Microsoft Image viewer is identical to the one seen in Camera Raw.
It appears therefore, that the operating system only uses SRGB Color Space profile for Microsoft Imaging Viewer?
Most people I give photos to, do in fact look at them in microsoft viewer.
How can I use the ICC profile for my calibrated monitor and end up with the same results in terms of color with Camera Raw and Microsoft image and Fax Viewer.

All profiles are not created equal. There's a basic version issue (ICC v4 vs. earlier), and profiles are complex things containing many fields. Lots of things can go wrong in the creation of a proper color transform from the combination of the document and device profiles, and it kind of depends on what color management code the software uses whether it can be done properly. Adobe has their own - the Adobe Color Engine - and there are others such as LittleCMS or even Microsoft's system-provided ICM that application designers may be using in their code.
It may be that the profile your calibrator/profiler has produced for your monitor (or other device) isn't compatible with every application. It happens.
This isn't intended to provide a solution or workaround, just to help explain things a bit.
-Noel

Color differences between high and low res images in Illustrator pdfs

OK, I'm creating a tradeshow graphic for a client. I designed the whole thing in Illlustrator CS6. But for the proof, I used a low res image of the sky (before we purchased it). Everyone was happy. It was a low-res RGB image imported into Illustrator, then the whole thing was exported as a pdf.
Once they approved it, I purchased the high res image. RGB. Same image... just high res. I popped it into the Illustrator file and exported it in exactly the same way. But now, the image looks much more purple. The low res pdf showed it as much brighter, lighter blue.
My client prefers the lighter blue. When I look at the two images in Photoshop, they look the same (in terms of color).
So... should I be worred? Why is there such a color difference? Thanks!
I'm attaching jpgs of the pdfs just to show you the color differences.
Julie

Print Graphics: File >> Document Color Mode CMYK.
Digital Graphics: File >> Document Color Mode RGB.
The PDF presets in Illusttrator will generate CMYK PDFs or PDFs in the colorpsace Illustrator is set to, (except for smallest file size which makes RGB PDFs).
Firsst make sure you are in the correct colorspace in Illustrator before proceeding, adn make your imaeg CMYK if you are for example doing a banner for tradeshow. Backlit graphics are the only print graphics exception and should be RGB because Lambda printers actaully are native RGB.
Open your lo and hi res in Phoothsop and compare the color values by watching the info aplette in Photoshop.
When generating PDFs keep in minds that and RGB PDFs have different color than a CMYK PDF.

Is there a way to color one thing in a black and white photo. Example: I have a picture of a tulip field and I want to make it black and white - which I have already done - but I want to make one single tulip red. Help?

Is there a way to color one thing in a black and white photo. Example: I have a picture of a tulip field and I want to make it black and white - which I have already done - but I want to make one single tulip red. Help?

No, you'll need an external editor for the job:
In order of price here are some suggestions:
Seashore (free)
The Gimp (free)
Graphic Coverter ($45 approx)
Acorn ($50 approx)
Pixelmator ($50 approx)
Photoshop Elements ($75 approx)
There are many, many other options. Search on MacUpdate. You can set Photoshop (or any image editor) as an external editor in iPhoto. (Preferences -> General -> Edit Photo: Choose from the Drop Down Menu.) This way, when you double click a pic to edit in iPhoto it will open automatically in Photoshop or your Image Editor, and when you save it it's sent back to iPhoto automatically. This is the only way that edits made in another application will be displayed in iPhoto.

CS5 - Color difference between Photoshop and other programs

I'm running CS5.5 student edition on a brand new Asus Q500A laptop running Windows 8. i7 processor and a UMA graphics card.
I do not have calibration software; I'm using Calibrize for the moment and colors appear fairly true when browsing after calibration.
My problem is that overall colors in Photoshop appear more saturated than those in regular browser windows, particularly reds. I set up my computer to run the Win8 photos app and my desktop with Photoshop simultaneously and the color difference was immediately noticeable. I did a quick screen grab to show the difference; the inset photo is the one viewed in Win8's photos app, and the background is the exact same photo open in Photoshop.
This is the second install of this program. I originally installed it on a Dell Inspiron with a DuoCore processor (way out of spec, I know - that's why I upgraded!) and I seem to remember having this issue then, too. I found a way to correct it, but I don't remember how I fixed it and Photoshop is no longer on that machine so I can't look over my settings.
I have not changed the color profile in Photoshop. When installed it chose North America General Purpose 2 as default and I've left it there. I experimented with the other color profiles and while the color tone in Photoshop changes, there is still a difference when the image is viewed in another program.
Any help is much appreciated - I can't trust the program to handle color properly right now and until I can, I'm dead in the water.

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. When I view the image on another computer or my iPhone, the image views properly. It's my photography, from a tree in my back yard. I know how the image is supposed to look, and right now it doesn't look right in Photoshop.
On my previous machine, I am almost positive that it was saving as sRGB by default as well. I don't remember what color profile I was working in, but I know that I did not have a color profile/space error pop up on opening new images, nor do I have that problem on other images saved on that machine that I'm opening on the laptop.

Color difference between LR3 and CS5

Hi!
When I edit an image in Lightroom and then continue editing it in photoshop I see a major color difference.That also happens when I export an image from lightroom as a .jpg and then upload it to the web,colors look the same as in photoshop.Color space is set to sRGB in both PS and my monitor.
http://imgur.com/a/rxt1l

wooliudo wrote:
i'm asking it because it looks like your system's taking the wrong monitor profile, and it'll make a difference between color managed software like LR/PS, and unmanaged software like some browsers(IE before 9). And your PS color management setting seems wrong as well.
My suggestion is to try changing the working space to standard sRGB first and see if the difference disappears.
I changed it to standard sRGB and it's the same.
And as I said,the problem is not with photoshop,colors in PS are correct and they appear the same on the web but they are not displayed in lightroom correctly.
Also,B&W photos look more like sepia in LR.
http://imgur.com/a/r2Uyz
I should note that I had the same problem a few months ago and I solved it by changing color temperature in my monitor OSD from "warm" to sRGB but it's also sRGB now.
wooliudo wrote:
oh one more thing, make sure you haven't turn on "proof color" by mistake in PS. press ctrl+Y would toggle it.
It's off.

Color difference between placed PDF and original PDF

I'm kind of out of my league on color issues.
A client asked for a book to be supplied as a PDF eBook. He wants me to
add back and front covers to the B&W book interior and give him the
whole thing as a PDF. He supplied 6x9 PDFs of the book's front and back
covers. I Placed them at the top and bottom of my 6x9 Indesign file, and
then Exported PDF. Under Output, I set Color Conversion: No Color
Conversion and under Profile Inclusion Policy, I set Don't Include Profiles.
He's telling me that if he prints the original front or back cover PDF
and then prints the front or back cover from the eBook PDF he sees
different colors, he used the words "lighter" and "hazy".
When I open his front cover and the front cover from my PDF in
Photoshop, I can find color differences. For instance, under high
magnification type is consistently RGB 243/203/70 in his cover, but in
mine, type shows as a range of different yellows with a few flecks of
light green thrown in. His PDF is saved directly from Photoshop CS3.
Mine has, obviously, been through Indesign, but I can open it at the
same resolution and color mode in Photoshop.
What should I be doing to preserve his colors exactly?
Kenneth Benson
Pegasus Type, Inc.
www.pegtype.com

Kenneth,
this is hardly an observable difference:
"RGB 243/203/70 in his original,RGB 243/203/71 in mine"
Downsampling should be switched off (instead of placing
by size 100% and using the old ppi value, that's just an
unnecessary complication).
The text by PhS was probably part of the raster image.
In such a case avoid any JPEG compression (e-book),
because this will change almost all colors just a little
even in large areas. Raster text will be garbled (your
observation).
"No Color Conversion and under Profile Inclusion Policy
I set Don't Include Profiles"
This is IMO correct for a reproduction, whatever
ingredients might be in the original page or in the PDF.
The only remaining sources for a color shift - visible
by comparing the two versions under the same test con-
ditions - are downsampling and JPEG compression, IMO.
Note: the question is not whether the two versions are
correct, but whether they are identical.
Best regards --Gernot Hoffmann

Changes from Visio 2010 to 2013 - highlighting entire line drawing document with text fields and changing line colors

I work with very large visio drawings that are basically line drawings (network drawings) with text boxes indicating equipment location. We work in future and current drawings, future has colored lines indicating connection type and objects have text in
them that indicate if they are new by having red text. Current drawings have all black lines and black text.
Here's my dilemma, previously I would Ctrl+A and then change all text and all lines to black in Visio 2010, everything would change no problem. In Visio 2013 every text box now get's a black border around it, I've tried selecting all text boxes at once
and trying to remove the line but no luck.
These drawings are HUGE and it takes me a good hour just to change between future and current where previously it took me seconds. I have many coworkers and we're all experiencing he same issue with the move to 2013.
Is there a macro or some vb script I can utilize to select all text boxes and remove the black outline?
Hope you can help!

try this macro
Sub Simple()
Dim sh As Shape, counter As Integer
ActiveWindow.SelectAll
For counter = 1 To ActiveWindow.Selection.Count
Set sh = ActiveWindow.Selection(counter)
If Len(sh.Text) > 0 Then sh.Cells("Geometry1.Noline").FormulaU = "IF(LEN(SHAPETEXT(TheText))>0,1,0)"
Next
MsgBox "All text borders set invisible"
End Sub
if in your drawings you have only lines and text label (NOT rectangles, circles and other shapesconteined text for example) this macro can help !

Color Difference with Indesign versions

Has anyone experienced any color difference breakdowns between CS3 and CS4? We just noticed it with a file that we created within CS4 and saved out to CS3.inx that the colors shift. We checked the color settings and both programs are set with the same working space profiles. Any other suggestions what would cause this? The colors were not built with Pantone colors therefore should eliminate the Pantone library

The Color Settings’ Working Spaces don't necessarily color manage the document—if there's a profile assigned to the CS3 document, that profile takes precedent over the Working CMYK Space. So, you have to check the document's assigned CMYK space (Edit>Assign Profiles...), if that is something other than GRACol2006_Coated1v2 you would expect to get a conversion when you open the file in CS4 with the Color Settings you are using.
If you don't want CMYK color conversions when you open the file, either remove the assigned profile (Edit>Assign Profiles...Discard (Use Current Working Space)) before opening in CS4, or stop using Convert to Working Space as your CMYK Policy. Convert to Working Space is rarely an appropriate policy—unless you routinely need to repurpose jobs for new printing conditions—even then it's not a great idea because it's easier to make the conversion when you export to PDF or print.

Color difference b/t JPG images seen on DPP vs. Preview

I take photos w/ Canon 30D using RAW file and touch up/convert to JPG on DPP. There is a significant color difference on the same JPG image when seen on DPP vs. when seen on Preview. Does anybody have the same problem? It only looks different on Preview b/c when I upload it on a web gallery, the color looks fine, so it's not the converting process that's messing up the color but something about Preview that's causing the problem. Any solution to this?

I've got the same problem on my new macbook. And what's more disturbing is I still could not find one display color profile could give the right color...the color LCD one is ok for daily use, but the color is still duller than it should be, when editing photos.

Color differences between these two files?

Could someone please tell me the color differences between these two files? What are the differences in general of these two files and how do I make a file identical to the blue cancel button?
I am working with signature pads and the BLUE CANCEL image works, but the other GREEN image does not. Both are 8-bit .bmp files... HELP!

#1, obviously, would be to connect a mic that doesn't require phantom power.
And #2 comes with a 6 ft. USB cable, so you may not need a bunch more cables. Maybe just one standard XLR to connect a mic to it.
Message was edited by: p o'flynn

ACR color difference with PS CS4

I tried a search and can't find a thread about what I'm seeing, so I'm posting in the hopes that others may be seeing the same thing.
I have PS CS4 and ACR 5.3 (latest patches) on a Windows XP Pro computer. I use Adobe RGB as my working space and profile my dual monitors with an Eye One Display2. I recently started experimenting with using ACR to edit tif files, but I noticed that while the image is loaded in the ACR window it looks quite different color wise than the Bridge thumbnail or within CS4 (after opening it as a smart object). The look in ACR is similar to what the same image looks like in CS4 with the ColorMatch profile assigned to the image (i.e. quite a bit brighter and lacking saturation).
Here's the weird things:
When I first open the tif image, it looks correct as long as the exclaimation mark is present on the preview window. Once the file is fully processed and that icon disappears the image color makes the dramatic change. If I then make no changes and simply open the image in CS4, then it's back to the original "correct" colors.
If I zoom in the ACR preview to 50% or higher, then the color difference is negligible if not entirely gone, but I can't edit an 8000x5000 without seeing the entire image.
Here's what I have tried:
Turned off all OpenGL features
Verified my monitor profile was being recognized by CS4
Ensured my color settings didn't get changed (preserve profiles is on, as well as ask on mismatch)
Tested them with an image that was a known mismatch and it asked what I should do as expected
I tried PS CS3 and ACR 4.x with the same result
Stripped out XMP metadata with Exiftool to see if that may have been an issue - it wasn't
I'm hoping someone else has an idea what is causing this or if it's a known issue. Any ideas or confirmation on what I'm seeing would be appreciated.
Craig

cssadobe wrote:
It doesn't matter which space is set, the display of the image is always the same in ACR.
Holy cow! If that's the case in your setup, you have a HUGE problem, Craig.
You should definitely see a big difference in the ACR preview when you set your ACR worflow options to ProPhoto RGB compared to either Adobe RGB or sRGB. If you don't, either your monitor is not accurately calibrated and profiled, or it's a lousy narrow-gamut monitor, or your color management is broken.
EDIT: It could be that the scan was not really made in ProPhoto RGB but was converted by the lab to that profile, in which case then, yes, you would see no difference because the true, original color space was and remains narrower and smaller than the lowest common denominator, which could well be anything, including Color Match or sRGB (and we all know what the s stands for in sRGB!).
cssadobe wrote:
Since PS CS4 created the tiff, the preview and the actual image data should be identical in my opinion. Would you agree with that? I don't know why PS would create a preview that was not identical in display characteristics to the actual image.
No, I would not agree with that. No reasonable person can expect a low-resolution, JPEG-like preview embedded in the TIFF to look identical to the TIFF. Information has to be discarded to generate the preview. But that's beyond the scope of ACR.
What I would expect is that ACR would render a better display from the original data in the TIFF than what the mediocre embedded preview can generate.
cssadobe wrote:
If I zoom in on the image in ACR to at least 50%, then the difference seems to disappear.
Well, duh! You only see the real image when you view it at 100%. The farther you get from 100%, the more information is either being discarded (at anything less than 100%) or made up, invented at greater than 100%. 50% is still not as good as 100%, but it's definitely better than the miserably low 8.7% view you were using when you made that last screen shot.
Seeing that you have severe problems with your display, as suggested by the first paragraph in this post, there seems to be no point in discussing in detail any of the discrepancies you mention, most especially at any other view that is not actual pixels (100%).
I'll have to read the thread again when I have the time to see if you have said when you calibrated your monitor last and how, what your color settings are, what monitors you're running, etc.
I validate the calibration on my monitors practically on a daily basis with a hardware calibrator puck.
But, ultimately, viewing a large scan at a dismal 8.7% you can't make any of the judgments you are trying to make.

Color Difference - Camera Raw & Nikon Raw NEF

Hello everybody
When i open a Nikon Raw file in Camera Raw (Photosop CC) I notice a distinct color-difference between the integrated preview image in the Raw file and the camera Raw standard.
I want to start with the exact same color how it came from the camera.
Refers to Nikon D300 or D800 in Raw / Nef format.
left, from Camera Raw 8.4.1 "Camera Raw Standard"
right, integrated preview from the original raw-file
Mostly i have the difference in Blue, it's too much cyan in there an looks not "natural"!
thanks for help

The third icon in from the right (looks like a camera) called camera calibrations is where the presets live that supposedly match that of your camera.
Even though you use those presets, you are not done. To match what you see in your camera, you must manually adjust the sliders under the basic tab until it does match.
What you see in your camera is a processed image, which is applied to a jpg only. The raw file is just that raw, no processing is done to it. Think of it as a negative. It is your permanent record of the image. Camera raw is then used to manually set up the image to your personal liking. Which does a better job the camera or yourself, is dependent on your skills. You can get details out of that raw file that the camera can not.
When you find you are placing the sliders in certain location more than once, then it is time to create a preset in camera raw that stores those settings. The more you use camera raw, more you can see when your own preset can be used (even as a starting point) and when it is time to do everything manually.
So in other words it is going to take time to 1)get a keen eye 2)understand the subtle differences in what each setting does and 3) collect a library of presets that you can use time and again.

Color picker - "color field" and "current color" differences

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for