Colors pantone book do not match with screen?

Hello,
I am having a problem with matching the colors in my Pantone book with the colors on my screen. My screen is calibrated with the colormunki display. The adobe suite is synchronized and I use fogra39 as my working space.
I have looked up a color in my Pantone+ uncoated guide: a deep dark red (1797c). However, when selecting the swatch in illustrator it shows up as a pinkish red. It does not match the color book at all!
Also, the cmyk values of this swatch are entirely different than what is is in the guide.
Can anyone tell me what the problem is?
Ps. I have overprint view on and use lab colors to show spot colors. My monitor is normal gamut, but I can reproduce the color with my own cmyk mix. So my monitor can reproduce the color.
On my iPad (Pantone app) and in de Pantone manager I also see this pinkish red color, which does not match the color in the book...
Thanks!

There is one point which nobody have made mention of, which also is something anyone who works in print should know about.
The first thing to know is that there are some Green and Red Pantones that are IMPOSSIBLE to reproduce on screen because of the limitation of the RGB gamut. (The RGB of screens can only reproduce a bit more than 60% of the real-life colors and around 50% of the Pantone are situated inside the remaining missing 40%. Almost EVERY Pantone, on your charts, that are situation on the 2 top and 2 bottom positions are not reproducible on screen.)
So, it's always normal that some Pantone never look the same between a screen and the Pantone chart even if the screen is calibrated in the best ways and that is why you uses a Pantone chart. The Pantone chart isn't just a "decision" tool, but also a "preview" tool so that you can see the exact final color regardless of what's on screen.
If that is not working with your workflow, then it simply means that your workflow is flawed as it's how it has been made to be. It's not a choice, but a limitation of physics with computer hardware which you have to live with as a professional.

Similar Messages

India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance

We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
Please help.
Regards
Suresh

user702249 wrote:
We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
Please help.
Regards
SureshPlease do not post duplicates -- India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.

Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

Hello everyone,
I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Himanshu Gupta

Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
Himanshu Gupta

AW01N- Total of write up not matching with total of indivudual transaction

Hi,
While viewing any Asset via AW01N, the total of Write up transaction is not matching with the total of individual transactions displayed in same screen.(It displays only last transaction value in total of write up transcation)
We applied OSS note No. 762128 still the problem exists.
Please inform me if anybody has resolved this before.
Thanks
Prasad

Hi,
Please note that the determination of the costs behaves differently in
the itemization and in the cost component split.
In the itemization, each item is rounded separately, while in the cost
component split first the individual items will be added up and then the
value will be rounded. The differences can be avoided by increasing the
lot sizes.
Please review sap note 168238, which explains the systems behaviour
and check the solution.
To avoid the occurrance of this problem you should
- always cost the header material again if an ingoing component with
changed values is being costed.
- also cost all materials again following a price calculation for a
particular period.
Please do not forget:
The itemization view only displayed the itemization on that level,
while the cost component view will display the cost component split
from all levels.
Please review sap note 889474. Sap note 66900 also explain why
small differences arise between the itemization and the cost component
split.
I hope helps,
Regards,
MLM

GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger

Hi,
Please suggest me regarding this...
The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
How can i achieve the below:
1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
Thanks
Sap Guru

Hi,
It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
regards
Thomas

Accounting doc entries not matching with the the entries from j_1ipart2 entries

Hi,
After creating PO, I have done MIGO and J1IEX. Now, posted MIRO. The end screen shows a number stating accounting document created.
I checked the accounting doc in fb03 and the document is displayed over there. I also checked the table for values captured in PART2 of excise. The value displayed in table is not matching with the value displayed in accounting document. Can anyone help?

Hello Tejas,
Here is the updated version of the situation.
After the transaction J1IEX, I got a message saying an 'Accounting Document' has been created. But the accounting document number does not match with the original values. I checked all the tables and found out that the accounting document is not created.
In this case, I thought of creating an accounting document manually and adding them directly to the table.
Here are my questions,
-Can I manually create an accounting document for multiple line items?
-Few tax values should be split and should go to 2 different GL accounts. so how to do this if I am creating it manually
-Or can I delete the values captured during 'J1IEX' in the table and reopen the GR so that the t-code j1iex can be processed again?

Account Currency is not matching with document currency

Hi,
In Sales A/R Invoice Screen when Iam trying to add a document its giving an error by saying Account Currency is not matching with document currency.
(Item is an Excisable Item and Currency is BP Currency)
Pls let me know the reason.
Thanks&Regards,
Chakrapani Bandaru
9849290882

Hello chakrapani bandaru,
Please set all the G/L accounts involved in the transactions to Multicurrency accounts (e.g. BP, revenue tax accounts etc.)
It means BP account, revenue and tax account
as well, even if there is 0% tax.
Please check Administration/System Initialisation/Company Details/ Basic Initialisation/Default Account Currency and make sure it is set toMulti Currency.
The exchange rate difference account should also be set to multi currency.
hope it helps.
Wilm Wang
SAP Business One Forums Team

Flash Chart Error "A Start-tag was not matched with an end-tag."

All of the Flash charts on a page started displaying the error "A Start-tag was not matched with an end-tag." The charts were all working prefectly and no changes were made to the page. Any thoughts?
Thanks.

Here is what I get when I click Show XML in debug mode. Thanks.
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
- <root>
- <styles>
<style type="background" id="background" background_type="solid" color="0xffffff" alpha="0" />
<style type="deal_background" id="dealBackground" enabled="yes" color="0xdddddd" alpha="100" />
<style type="deal_border" id="dealBorder" enabled="yes" thickness="1" color="0x666666" alpha="100" />
<style type="deal_position" id="dealPosition" left="146" top="169.1707317" />
<style type="deal_size" id="dealSize" startAngle="0" endAngle="180" innerRadius="0" outerRadius="109.5" />
<style type="indicator_background" id="indicatorBackground" enabled="yes" color="0x000000" alpha="100" />
<style type="indicator_border" id="indicatorBorder" enabled="yes" color="0xFFFFFF" thickness="1" alpha="0" />
<style type="scale_size" id="scaleSize" length="7.3" />
<style type="scale_position" id="scalePosition" radius="102.2" />
<style type="scale_lines" id="scaleLines" enabled="yes" thickness="1" color="0x000000" alpha="100" />
<style type="scale_labels_position" id="scaleLabelsPosition" radius="109.5" />
<style type="scale_labels_background" id="scaleLabelsBackground" enabled="no" />
<style type="scale_labels_border" id="scaleLabelsBorder" enabled="no" color="0x000000" />
<style type="scale_labels_text" id="scaleLabelsText" font="Verdana" size="10" color="0x000000" bold="no" italic="no" underline="no" align="right" />
<style type="scale_labels_size" id="scaleLabelsSize" />
<style id="areaBackground0" type="area_background" enabled="yes" color="0x669999" alpha="100" />
<style id="areaBackground1" type="area_background" enabled="yes" color="0xCCCCCC" alpha="100" />
<style id="areaBorder" type="area_border" enabled="yes" thickness="1" color="0xFFFFFF" alpha="100" />
<style id="areaBorder0" type="area_border" enabled="yes" thickness="1" color="0x666666" alpha="100" />
<style id="areaSize" type="area_size" outerRadius="105.85" innerRadius="36.5" />
<style type="circle_object_border" id="dotBorder" enabled="no" />
<style type="circle_object_position" id="dotPosition" left="146" top="169.1707317" />
<style type="circle_object_size" id="dotSize" radius="7.3" />
<style type="circle_object_background" id="dotBackground" enabled="yes" color="0x000000" alpha="100" />
<style id="emptyBorder" enabled="no" />
</styles>
- <shapes>
- <shape id="indicatorShape" type="polygon">
<point x="0" y="-4" />
<point x="-97.82" y="0" />
<point x="0" y="4" />
<point x="0" y="-4" />
</shape>
</shapes>
- <objects>
<circle sizeStyleId="dotSize" positionStyleId="dotPosition" backgroundStyleId="dotBackground" borderStyleId="dotBorder" />
</objects>
- <data>
<deal minimum="0" maximum="100" sizeStyleId="dealSize" positionStyleId="dealPosition" backgroundStyleId="dealBackground" borderStyleId="dealBorder" />
- <areas>
<area startValue="1" endValue="99" backgroundStyleId="areaBackground1" borderStyleId="areaBorder" sizeStyleId="areaSize" />
</areas>
- <scales>
<scale startAngle="0" endAngle="180" angleStep="18" labelsPrefix="" labelsPostfix="%" decimalPlaces="0" sizeStyleId="scaleSize" positionStyleId="scalePosition" linesStyleId="scaleLines" labelPositionStyleId="scaleLabelsPosition" labelBackgroundStyleId="scaleLabelsBackground" labelBorderStyleId="scaleLabelsBorder" labelTextStyleId="scaleLabelsText" labelSizeStyleId="scaleLabelsSize" />
</scales>
<indicator value="51.7412935" backgroundStyleId="indicatorBackground" borderStyleId="indicatorBorder" shapeId="indicatorShape" />
</data>
</root>

Some employees designations are not matching with their actual designation

Hi All,
While downloading to excel sheet some employees designations are not matching with their actual designations maintained in infotye 0001.
Designations should match with infotype 0001.
How to rectifty this issue.
Let me know...
Regards,
Sita

Hi
Looks like you are dowloading the value from a field which does not contain the value you see in the infotype screen
In infotypr 0001 place your cursor in the designation field.
Press F1
See the name of the field & the table.
Have a look at the table using se16 and confirm what you see in the field is what you see in the infotype screen.
If it is same see in your code if you are using correct field.
If it is not the same trace in which table and field the value is stored and code your program to download from there.
Check in Tables HRP1000 and PA0001 and you should get your values
regards
Pravin

Clean-up all data that did not match with the selection.

Hi Everyone,
In my requirement I need to Clean-up all data that did not match with the selection from my internal table lt_cdpos.....in this case wat can i use like.'Refresh' or ' Clear' or 'DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM lt_cdpos'.
Pls suggest me...

Hi Meenakshi
Try delete lt_cdpos where kunnr NE KUNNR (from selection screen) .
Before Checking <condition> make sure both comparing field type match with each other.
You can use FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT' for append leading zeros in compare condition before comparing kunnr from selection screen
Regards
Parveen

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

Inventory data not matching with R/3

Hi,
In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
1.What could be the reason?
2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
Pls help us with your suggestions.

We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
Pls help with your inputs.
Thanks
Soujanya

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

Colors pantone book do not match with screen?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for