Colour management and ordering Aperture prints

I have recently ordered some prints in Aperture. When they arrived the colours were not exactly true to the original picture on the screen.
The monitor was calibrated before ordering prints, but I wonder if there is anything else I need to do to improve the quality.
Should I be using gamma 1.8 or 2.2? Any tips on soft proofing the photos before I order them would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Adrian

My experience with the build-in ordering system of Aperture has not been very positive. I have stopped using it. My last set came out with too high a contrast and was over-sharpened. A previous order had noticeably different color for the same photo printed in two different sizes (and different again from my calibrated screen).
Depending on the country your living in, different labs will be used, so experiences will differ. I have got my prints from the Netherlands, although I do not live in the Netherlands directly.
I have since switched to a much more expensive local lab, color is much closer to what my screen shows. Matching general impression of brightness and contrast is still not perfect though.
It usually is best to use a gamma of 2.2, if only because once you leave a color managed world (eg, your photos are displayed on any other web browser than Safari, or vice versa, you view images with Firefox) the default assumption is almost always a gamma of 2.2.
One 'problem' with most cheapish labs is that they often apply some sort of automatic correction which can easily negatively affect your photos.
One indicator for a good lab is that they are offering ICC profiles.

Similar Messages

My problem is that after printing the first photo or picture, when I come to print a second, both the Colour Management and Epson Colour Controls are greyed out and showing No Colour Management

I have recently purchased a Mac computer (updated to Maverick) to go with my Epson Stylus Photo RX500 printer which has given excellent service with my old Windows computer. However, when trying to print pictures or photos via Photoshop Elements 11, the best results I can get are using the Colour Management and Epson Colour controls in the printing options box.
My problem is that after printing the first photo or picture, when I come to print a second, both the Colour Management and Epson Colour Controls are greyed out and showing No Colour Management, The only way I can reset the controls is to shut down the printer and computer and restart.
Could there may be a setting somewhere that I need to adjust please? I have been in touch with Epson and they say that the Epson Colour controls are part of the Photoshop Elements software but a post on the Adobe forum brought no results and I am unable to contact Adobe.
<Edited by Host>

Hello Garry. Thanks for the reply. I guess I should have used a different title from "How do I post a question?" That should come after trying to resolved the colour settings first. However, to answer your question, after experimenting with all the different settings in Photoshop Elements and Epson software, I now start with PSE11 Colour settings then click "no colour management" then after clicking Print, I choose "More Options/Colour Management/Colour Handling/Printer Manages Colour" then I choose "Page Setup/Layout/Colour Matching" which then shows Epson Colour Controls but I also choose "Layout/Colour Management" which then shows "Colour Controls/Mode" I then of course choose an Epson printer profile depending on the paper I am using. I get good results but as I said, the Colour Matching and Colour Controls are then greyed out. Hope that makes sense.

Color Management and Canon i960 printer

When I go to print from Aperture it says to turn off the Canon color management driver. How do I do this?

It depends on the printer driver. My Epson driver has a special, color section. However my simple Canon pixma doesn't have this. It either automatically turns color management off (in PS and Aperture) Or you have to use a workaround (when printing form e.g. Illustrator) By selecting the sRGB profile in the colorsync tab.
So you're best option at this point is to contact Canon support: Luckily for you, they describe how to print using ICC-profiles on their website:
How to use custom profiles in printing
For printing using a custom, user-made or third-party profiles, follow the procedures below. ColorSync color processing based on the custom profile can be performed by the application, or by the printer driver.
1. Specifying an ICC Profile within an Application
2. Open the image you want to print in an application. Edit/retouch the image as needed.
3. Check that the correct ICC profile has been assigned, select the item that allows the application to manage colors, then specify the profile for printing. For example, from the Print or Print with Preview screen of Adobe Photoshop, select 'Photoshop Manages Colors', then select a profile as the printer profile. At this time, please clear the 'Black Point Compensation' checkbox.
The ICC profiles installed for Canon photo paper appear as follows.
Note: The profile names for other manufacturers' papers will appear differently.
(For example: Canon Pro9000 PR1)
(1) Printer model name
(2) Media type
Each letter pair represents its respective Media type.
PR = Canon Photo Paper Pro and Pro II
SP: = Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy
MP: = Canon Matte Photo Paper
SG: = Canon Photo Paper Plus Semi-gloss
GL: = Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy II
PT: = Canon Photo Paper Pro Platinum
Note: If your printer does not support one of the above paper types, the corresponding profile will not be installed. Please see the on-screen manual of your printer for supported paper types.
(3) Print quality
The numbers correspond to the numbers on the print quality slide bar in the [Quality & Media] dialog box opened from the Print screen of the driver. The lower the number, the finer the quality.
4. Select the command to print from your application to bring up the Print screen.
In Mac OS X 10.5 and 10.6, select Color Matching from the drop-down menu, and then select 'ColorSync'.
Note: If you are using Adobe Photoshop CS2 or newer and have selected 'Let Photoshop Determine Colors', the 'Color Matching' from the Print Options pop-up menu is automatically set to 'ColorSync.'
Using earlier versions of Mac OS X, from the Print dialogue, select Color Options from the drop-down menu, set 'Color Correction': 'None'.
5. Select Quality & Media from the drop-down menu. Set the Media Type and print quality settings to the same parameters as those in the custom profile.
6. Click 'Print' to print your image.
Message was edited by: Ir. Bob

Relationship between the Koren Colour Management Model and PSE11

I would like to relate the settings I apply to colour printing in PSE11 to the general model of Colour Management, in particular that described by Norman Koren(see his Papers on the internet). Then I will better understand what I am doing.
I have an Epson printer and the driver contains the paper profiles for Epson papers.
In principle, the Koren Model shows each device(camera image, monitor and printer) is linked through its Colour Engine(with the device profile infeed) to the central Image Working Colour Space.
The PSE11 controls are:
1. Printer Settings(through the Windows printer menus)
2. Colour Management (through Edit->Colour Management, and
3. Printer settings(through the File->print screens).
1 and 3 are clearly associated with the printer. What happens when I select the options in 3? Am I modifying the paper profiles?
Is there any control over the central Image Working Space? Is the Koren Model more complicated than the PSE11 Model?
I know Colour Management can get very complicated - but I hope to find an explanation that will help an amateur photographer!
Grateful for any help.

The menu edit / color management defines which color space will be used internally by Elements to record the edits which change the RGB values of pixels. A correct choice will insure a correct rendition on a calibrated display.
Several cases :
- the photo file is tagged for a specific color space. Then, if Elements can work internally with that color space, it uses it for the calculations. Contrary to common belief, Elements can work internally with other spaces than sRGB or aRGB. Lightroom users can easily check that a Prophoto tagged image can be processed in Elements. The picture is correctly displayed and when you 'save as' the checkbox for color space, it is in Prophoto RGB.
- The photos are not tagged : that's where the options to 'optimize' for sRGB come into play. The internal working space will be assigned to the photo : sRGB to optimize for screen, aRGB to optimize for print.
- Another situation : raw files. Raw data don't have a color space. They simply record the 'brightness' of the light gathered under the RGB filters. The correct 'white balance' and color space are defined in the conversion process. In the ACR module of Elements, there is no dialog for you to choose between sRGB or aRGB. The settings in your camera are ignored. Instead, ACR reads your choice for optimization in that edit / color menu. The conversion menu adopts the color space in that menu.
So, that menu is mainly to define which color space will be chosen as 'working space' and what to do if that color space is not yet defined in the file metadata header.
The printer and paper color settings are not taken into account here, only in the print module.
Edit:
I forgot to mention that the same edit / color menu is there to provide ways to convert to another color space (converting the RBG values, not only assigning a color space tag).

Colour management printing from LR 2.5

When printing to my HP z3200 from LR.2.5 on a macbook pro OS 10.6 how do I get the application to handle colour management rather than the printer? Ordinarily I would print from Photoshop (CS3) and let photoshop manage colours but Photoshop seems unable to handle big print files on my system. I can print them from Lightroom but seem to only be able to use "Let printer handle Color management" which I suspect is not as good as using color management in Lightroom or photoshop. Any body out there have any solutions? Thank you very much if you do.

You possibly need to add the profiles for your printer first.
In LR select 'other' in the profile dropdown for the color managment. In the list check all the profiles you need for your printer.
When you select a printer profile in LR and let LR manage the colors make sure to turn off the color management in your printer driver settings.
HTH
Franz

Photoshop CS6 Colour Management Printing issue

Hi,
We use Photoshop and 2 x Epson 9800 printers to print our images, we used to use CS4 and have recently upgraded to CS6.
We are having a problem with the “Colour Management” settings in the Printer Settings window. We choose for Photoshop to Manage Colours and select our ICC profile and Rendering Intent and Black Point. Our problem is that these settings reset each time we switch between our 2 printers back to “Photoshop Manages Colours” so we have keep selecting the same settings over and over again. This never happened on CS4.
How do we save these settings so that they do not reset each time we switch between printers.
I don’t think it has any relevance but we have our printer’s settings set to “No Colour Management” as the warning states.
Kind Regards
Steven

You possibly need to add the profiles for your printer first.
In LR select 'other' in the profile dropdown for the color managment. In the list check all the profiles you need for your printer.
When you select a printer profile in LR and let LR manage the colors make sure to turn off the color management in your printer driver settings.
HTH
Franz

Managing colors for perfecct printing not working

Hi all,
I think I have tried everything and all my prints look exactly the same (different from what is on the screen) so if anyone could help, it would be great! (This is a thank you pic for all the people who came to my wedding!). In all the of pictures, it seems like there is too much yellow and they miss some of the saturation.
For this specific shot, the camera was a Digital Rebel XT. My printer is a Canon IP4300. My screen was calibrated with a Spider Express2 using a gamma of 2.2. Oh, my screen is a 23'' cinema display.
First try:
I used the Spider2Express color profile for my screen, in aperture I setted the color profile to system managed and in the printer setting, I disabled the color correction in the color option tab.
Second try:
screen color profile: Cinema HD
Aperture profile: system managed
disabled color correction
Third try:
screen color profile: Spider2Express
Aperture: Canon IJ Color printer profile 2005
disabled color correction
I also played with the black point compensation and it didnt change anything in the output.
Also, when I play with the onscreen proofing I cant see any changes between these profiles: spider2express, Cinema HD and the oen from the printer. If there is one, it is too small for me to notice.
Finaly, the print preview all look exactly as what was on the screen.
I really dont understant where the problem can be so any help would be great!

Hi Alan,
I'll give it a bash to help,
firstly you'll have calibrated your monitor with the spider express and it'll have created a profile. Your display should be set outside of aperture to use this profile. Go to system pref's, displays, select the colour tab and select the profile spider created. This gives your display the profile to use in all applications.
Next If your using photo paper there may be a profile for the printer / paper combination from the paper manufacturer, check their web site. I use Ilford and have downloaded the profile for my Canon i9950 & classic pearl and installed it. This profile then appears in the view, proofing profile within aperture. You should not really use on screen proofing untill after you've made all your image adjustments and then finally use on screen proofing to check for posterisation and colour saturation.
So now on to printing, Perhaps the profile you've downloaded suggests a default paper type to use such as (seeing as it's a canon printer) photo paper plus glossy or photo paper pro and if to use black point compensation or not. We need to keep these settings in mind when we enter the print menu. Best thing to do is copy the sample single image preset and rename it to the paper type and size your using. Then in the print settings for that newly created profile you'll see a button for printer settings, select it and you'll be presented with another menu for printer settings. In the 3rd drop down menu form the top select colorsync, color conversion = standard and quartz filter = none.
then select quality and media from the 3rd drop down and select the recommended paper type in the profile you downloaded (it's normally photo paper plus glossy) and change print mode to top quality photo.
Next again in the 3rd dropdown select colour options and set colour correction = none.
Next go to special effects and make sure no options are selected and click done.
You're back in the print menu, select the paper size you are using and the orentation. In the colorsync profile select the profile name for your paper and you may click black point compensation if required. Note the gamma setting usualy set at 1, and your print resolution, I normally have use best DPI selected. Now save this as the renamed paper type you copied at the start.
Next is to run off a test print making sure you select this new paper settings in the print window and see how it looks. If you notice it's a little dark go back and adjust the gamma to say 1.15 to 1.20 and try again. Don't forget to save your adjustments.
As you use different papers and sizes you create these settings and just simply select the required ones for the print size / paper type your using at print time.
This is how I work and it gives good results. Also if your getting dark results all the time consider reducing the lumanance of your display from a recomended 120 / 140 Cdm to something less like 90 / 100 cdm. The apple displays can run a little "bright" for printing giving the impression of dark prints when compared to the screen.
Best of luck
Eoin

PSE 8 colour management settings not remembered

In PSE 8, the colour management dialogue in File->Print->More Options->Color Management does not remember a Printer Profile that has been set.
I'm trying to help get a non-technical friend up and running with digital printing. He's bought PSE 8 and an Epson R2880, and wants to try printing with Ilford and Harman papers using the manufactuers ICC profiles. We've installed the profiles OK, but ...
On the friend's PC (running Vista Home Basic) if I set "PSE manages colors" and set a profile, then close the dialogue, then reopen the dialogue the handling has reverted to "Printer manages colors" and the profile drop-down is greyed-out (and remains so even after re-choosing "PSE manages colors").
I the installed the trial version of PSE 8 on my PC to try to replicate the problem. It's similar but not exactly the same ...
On my PC (running Win7 Ultimate) the Color Handling setting is retained, but no matter what ICC profile I choose, it always reverts to my original choice after closing and reopening the dialogue.

Finally got to the bottom of this,
Bizarrely, it appears that PSE needs to be run under an Administrator account to work properly.

CS5 and Lightroom 3 printing differently

I have recently upgraded Lightroom to v3.0 and took advantage,at the same time, to upgrade my CS3 to CS5.
I printed something from CS5 and was very dissapointed in the result. The printed result was much too dark. I recalibrated my printer, using Spyder3 print, for the printer/ink/paper combination I was using. I reprinted with the same results (much too dark). I have set CS5 to manage colour and selected the newly created profile and switched colour management off in the printer driver (Epson R2400).
I then tried printing the same image from within Lightroom 3. I set the profile to the same as used in CS5 and set colour management off in the printer driver. In both cases the rendering intent was set to Relative. This printed almost perfectly. Perhaps a little darker than on-screen but the colour rendering was fine.
To give you an idea as to how different the results are I took a picture of the screen with LR3 and CS5 showing the same image and with their respective prints propped below.
Any ideas what the problem might be?
Regards,
Norman

I have the same problem with CS5, but I don't have LR to compare it to. CS5 prints are much darker than displayed on monitor. Photoshop manages colors. Epson R1400. Monitor calibrated with Pantone Huey. Colors are accurate - just darker than screen. My everyday Canon MP640 shows same results, so I suspect the problem is tied to the display. Any hints?
Regards,
DJ

How do I fix colour picker to work across different colour-managed monitors?

Hey everyone!
I'm assuming this problem I'm having stems from having colour-calibrated monitors, but let me know if I'm wrong!
To preface, this is the setup I have:
Windows 7
3 monitors as follows, all have individual colour profiles calibrated using the Spyder 3
Cintiq 12WX
Dell U2410
Dell 2409WFP
Photoshop CS6 - Proofed with Monitor RGB, and tested with colour-managed and non-colour-managed documents
I usually do most of my work on the Cintiq 12WX, but pull the photoshop window to my main monitor to do large previews and some corrections. I noticed that the colour picker wouldn't pick colours consistently depending on the monitor the Photoshop window is on.
Here are some video examples:
This is how the colour picker works on my Dell U2410: http://screencast.com/t/lVevxk5Ihk
This is how it works on my Cintiq 12WX: http://screencast.com/t/tdREx4Xyhw9
Main Question
I know the Cintiq's video capture makes the picture look more saturated than the Dell's, but it actually looks fine physically, which is okay. But notice how the Cintiq's colour picker doesn't pick a matching colour. It was actually happening the opposite way for a while (Dell was off, Cintiq was fine), but it magically swapped while I was trying to figure out what was going on. Anyone know what's going on, and how I might fix it?
Thanks for *any* help!
Semi-related Question regarding Colour Management
Colour management has always been the elephant-in-the-room for me when I first tried to calibrate my monitors with a Spyder colourimeter years ago. My monitors looked great, but Photoshop's colours became unpredictable and I decided to abandon the idea of calibrating my monitors for years until recently. I decided to give it another chance and follow some tutorials and articles in an attempt to keep my colours consistent across Photoshop and web browsers, at least. I've been proofing against monitor colour and exporting for web without an attached profile to keep pictures looking good on web browsers. However, pictures exported as such will look horrible when uploaded to Facebook. Uploading pictures with an attached colour profile makes it look good on Facebook. This has forced me to export 2 versions of a picture, one with an attached colour profile and one without, each time I want to share it across different platform. Is there no way to fix this issue?
Pictures viewed in Windows Photo Viewer are also off-colour, but I think that's because it's not colour managed... but that's a lesser concern.

I think I've figured out the colour management stuff in the secondary question, but the weird eyedropper issue is still happening. Could just be a quirk from working on things across multiple monitors, but I'm hoping someone might know if this is a bug/artifact.
Going to lay out what I inferred from my experiments regarding colour management in case other noobs like me run into the same frustrations as I did. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - the following are all based on observation.
General Explanation
A major source of my problems stem from my erroneous assumption that all browsers will use sRGB when rendering images. Apparently, most popular browsers today are colour-managed, and will use an image's embedded colour profile if it exists, and the monitor's colour profile if it doesn't. This was all well and good before I calibrated my monitors, because the profile attached to them by default were either sRGB or a monitor default that's close to it. While you can never guarantee consistency on other people's monitors, you can catch most cases by embedding a colour profile - even if it is sRGB. This forces colour-managed browsers to use sRGB to render your image, while non-colour-managed browsers will simply default to sRGB. sRGB seems to be the profile used by Windows Photo Viewer too, so images saved in other wider gamut colour spaces will look relatively drab when viewed in WPV versus a colour-managed browser.
Another key to figuring all this out was understanding how Profile Assignment and Conversion work, and the somewhat-related soft-proofing feature. Under Edit, you are given the option to either assign a colour profile to the image, or convert the image to another colour profile. Converting an image to a colour profile will replace the colour profile and perform colour compensations so that the image will look as physically close to the original as possible. Assigning a profile only replaces the colour profile but performs no compensations. The latter is simulated when soft-proofing (View > Proof Colors or ctrl/cmd-Y). I had followed bad advice and made the mistake of setting up my proofing to Monitor Color because this made images edited in Photoshop look identical when the same image is viewed in the browser, which was rendering my images with the Monitor's colour profile, which in turn stemmed from yet another bad advice I got against embedding profiles . This should formally answer Lundberg's bewilderment over my mention of soft-proofing against Monitor Colour.
Conclusion and Typical Workflow (aka TL;DR)
To begin, these are the settings I use:
Color Settings: I leave it default at North American General Purpose 2, but probably switch from sRGB to AdobeRGB or ProPhoto RGB so I can play in a wider gamut.
Proof Setup: I don't really care about this anymore because I do not soft-proof (ctrl/cmd-Y) in this new workflow.
Let's assume that I have a bunch of photographs I want to post online. RAWs usually come down in the AdobeRGB colour space - a nice, wide gamut that I'll keep while editing. Once I've made my edits, I save the source PSD to prep for export for web.
To export to web, I first Convert to the sRGB profile by going to Edit > Convert to Profile. I select sRGB as the destination space, and change the Intent to either Perceptual or Relative Colorimetric, depending on what looks best to me. This will convert the image to the sRGB colour space while trying to keep the colours as close to the original as possible, although some shift may occur to compensate for the narrower gamut. Next, go to Save for Web. The settings you'll use:
Embed Color Profile CHECKED
Convert to sRGB UNCHECKED (really doesn't matter since you're already in the sRGB colour space)
and Preview set to Internet Standard RGB (this is of no consequence - but it will give a preview of what the image will look like in the sRGB space)
That's it! While there might be a slight shift in colour when you converted from AdobeRGB to sRGB, everything from then on should stay consistent from Photoshop to the browser
Edit: Of course, if you'd like people to view your photos in glorious wide gamut in their colour-managed browsers, you can skip the conversion to sRGB and keep them in AdobeRGB. When Saving for Web, simply remember to Embed the Color Profile, DO NOT convert to sRGB, and set Preview to "Use Document Profile" to see what the image would look like when drawn with the embedded color profile

Is it possible to put together and order an iPhoto book using my iPad?

Is it possible to put together and order a printed iPhoto book using my iPad

No. The iPhoto for iOS can edit photos and share them to social media sites like Facebook. But the app does not have the capability of creating photo books.

Hi - new to the forum. I am unable to get the true colour printing I am used to from my Canon Pixma 9500 mk2 since moving to a mac and using Aperture. The colours are simply not representative of the on-screen image. Any ideas?

Whatever I do with installing or de-installing printer drivers, selecting or deselecting colour synch or colour management options, the colour is simply awful compared to what I have been used to fir years, using the same printer with a pc and a 10 yeart old version of paintshop Pro. What is going on!??

First guess is that you are subjecting the data to two passes of printing conversions. If you use Aperture's color management for printing, you _must_ disable the color controls in your printer dialog.
How this is done varies for each printer. (The Aperture User Manual says, in full:
To turn off color management for your printer
Refer to the owner’s manual that came with your printer.
Additionally, make sure you have the most recent printer driver for your printer and OS. Printer makers have gotten good at making these files easy to get. Most now come with installation instructions.
Lastly, the only way to ensure that you get a good screen-to-print match is to use a hardware device to calibrate your monitor. That doesn't seem to be your problem, though.

Aperture colour management vs Printer colour management

I am quite new to both Aperture & Mac, having moved over from PC and generally Adobe software. I shoot RAW mainly, on a Nikon 200 and use a Epson R1800 printer.
I have used a Spyder 3 to calibrate my screen and I am happy with the on screen images. However I have used both Aperture 3 and the Epson colour management to print a few versions and am struggling to get the same satisfaction on paper. Previously on a PC (sorry for that) I had few problems with matching screen to paper.
Any thoughts or similar experiences would be most welcome
Thanks

I think you will find in the dialogues for printing the suggestion to turn off printer control of the color, and simply allow Aperture alone to control. This is recommended.
Ernie

Can Aperture 3 alone-and a pro printer, deliver museum quality prints?

I have been looking around for master classes in museum quality printing, but all the classes I know of use either Photoshop or Light Room (and Epson printers - while I own a Canon.) So I am off to a bad start here.
I don't mind buying another, better pro printer, but leaving Aperture 3 behind and starting another (steepr) learning curve with new software to follow advanced printing classes is a daunting idea.
Any ideas from anyone with museum quality printing?
Thanks,
Raphael

Raphael -- your question is unanswerable without a definition of "museum quality".
If you have "museum quality" images, you can make "museum quality" prints from within Aperture. Aperture's print engine is very good. It may be that in order to make the prints you want, you will use other print engines. There is nothing in Aperture that degrades the print quality of the images you import.
As Frank points out, the difficult aspects are color management and dynamic range. These have more to do with the color space in which you work, and the equipment used to work on it, than on Aperture itself.
Whether Aperture can meet your needs -- "enough of the type of adjustments required to produce an adjusted image capable of producing a superb quality print" -- is only determinable by you. There is very very little you can't do using the brushed adjustments.
Fwiw, I've printed 24 MP images on Epson 9900 printers at 24 x 36 inches and been entirely pleased.

Filename and sequencing of print orders?

I ordered a set of prints through Aperture. Before printing, I changed the names (for version & masters) to a date/time format. They came in and look great, but on the back they just have some nonsensical codes.
Also, the prints are TOTALLY out of order. Just random, and I ordered 110 of them. Even though the album I created before ordering they are sorted by filename (and hence date).
So now I have to reorder them and
Of course, there's no way to contat apple about this. 1800myapple gets you to an automated system that will give you a tracking #, but if you request an operator, it just says "sorry, we can't help you" and hangs up.
I want to use this service again. It was comparably priced, especially with the flat shipping fee. The colors are way better than what I usually do which is just print them for pickup at walgreens. But if I have to sort and label each one myself, I may have to look for alternate services.
Thanks.

Even though the album I created before ordering they are sorted by filename (and hence date)
Yes, It is a pity that you cannot specify the sorting order when printing:
As a workaround: Duplicate your original image files (you can delete the duplicate masters afterwards)
and rename the original files with a number prefix by batch changing the version name and applying the change to the original files
or print a caption onto the image or the border of the image using the BorderFX plug-in http://www.iborderfx.com/BorderFX
To duplicate the original files/masters create a new, empty project named "DuplicatesToBePrinted" or similar; then drag the images from the album you want to print to this project with the options-key held down. This will duplicate the original masters image files. Any edits you do to these images will leafe the other images untouched.

Colour management and ordering Aperture prints

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for