PSE 8 colour management settings not remembered

In PSE 8, the colour management dialogue in File->Print->More Options->Color Management does not remember a Printer Profile that has been set.
I'm trying to help get a non-technical friend up and running with digital printing. He's bought PSE 8 and an Epson R2880, and wants to try printing with Ilford and Harman papers using the manufactuers ICC profiles. We've installed the profiles OK, but ...
On the friend's PC (running Vista Home Basic) if I set "PSE manages colors" and set a profile, then close the dialogue, then reopen the dialogue the handling has reverted to "Printer manages colors" and the profile drop-down is greyed-out (and remains so even after re-choosing "PSE manages colors").
I the installed the trial version of PSE 8 on my PC to try to replicate the problem. It's similar but not exactly the same ...
On my PC (running Win7 Ultimate) the Color Handling setting is retained, but no matter what ICC profile I choose, it always reverts to my original choice after closing and reopening the dialogue.

Finally got to the bottom of this,
Bizarrely, it appears that PSE needs to be run under an Administrator account to work properly.

Similar Messages

  • Printing Colour Issues - colour management settings

    Hi there
    I've been having some serious printing problems recently when I print from InDesign CS5 and also from Acrobat when printing PDFs exported from InDesign.
    All of the print out colours a wrong (such as Blacks printing as pink)
    I have tried changing several settings, but nothing seems to be fixing it.
    I've replaced all my inks and I can print fine when printing in other programs such as word, so its not an ink issue.
    My printer is a Canon MP540
    I'm using a Mac, on OS X Lion.
    I think i'm using the default colour management settings, however could this possibly be the issue?- which settings might work?
    I would REALLY APPRECIATE any help with this issue!
    Many Thanks

    if I look at the same image in the default 'Preview' on Mac, the
    colours look different to what I see in PS
    First, that would clearly indicate your image does not have an embedded profile, or Ps is being told to ignore the embedded profile — Ps is applying a different profile (or it may have been dinked around with in its Edit> Color Settings> More Options> Advanced Controls).
    It is best for most people not to dink around with Color Settings> More Options...to get back a Default starting point, just select a preset like North American Prepress 2.
    I know there are a million posts and articles on this complex subject
    You only need one good article to grasp the basic issues.
    The short answer is you are either missing something in scenario One, or you are hitting a bug.
    When Photoshop setups a correct SourceSpace-to-PrintSpace Conversion the Epson will print your file faithfully if your Source Color is within print gamut and your Print Space reflects an accurate ICC profile to the specific printer-paper-ink you are printing to.
    I would recommend testing with a known good file like the download Photodisc PDI test image (so bad files don't confuse the process)...

  • X-Fi Audio Settings Not Remembered After Reboot - Solution

    I have an X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty PCI-E on WIN7 64bit and I decided to try some different drivers, just out of curiosity. My drivers were working fine for the most part (except OpenAL BSOD) prior to this.
    After changing drivers, Windows would no longer remember my audio settings, such as volume level and all the changes I made in the Creative Console Launcher (EQ, disable CMSS-3D, THX settings). After rebooting, the settings would revert to the default setting.
    Solution:
    I went into the Creative Audio Control Panel, to the "Restore Defaults" tab and, with all boxes checked, hit the "Restore Defaults" button. Whatever was causing it to not remember settings was cleared out and it now remembers all of my audio settings after restarting Windows.

    Hy,
    have you already tried to start the soundcard ?at other PCs?
    Do you have this problem with other usb-devices at your PC, too?
    What happens after standby or hibernate?
    Does for example a li've linux or windows in secure mode detect the x-fi after startup?
    Maybe this details can be helpful to find the reason. I could imagine, the died internal sound card is inhibiting windows in detecting any other audio device...
    I've had a died touch pad (the left mouse button didn't work after ~5 minutes) and until disable it, the same problem happened with the other trackpoint mouse, too.

  • 'creative colour suite settings' not enabled. Cant match Bridge / ACR colour profile to PS Colour se

    Hi, i need some help if possible from anyone using CS4 on a Mac. I just switched to an IMac and downloaded the trial version of CS4. I am going to buy it i think but i am having trouble with colour space.
    In PS i have changed the colour settings to reflect what my lab requires and that is working fine. But in Bridge i cannot access the 'creative suite colour settings' so that my pics coming out out of ACR into PS don't have the same colour space. I get a message saying the
    'document has an embedded colour profile that does not match the current RGB working space.
    embedded rgb 1998
    working srgb IEC blah blah blah
    In CS3 on my PC i think i remember changing both and i don't have any issue. I am getting really confused. Any advice would be appreciated :)

    Did you download the whole suite or just Photoshop?
    However, that's not the problem here. The issue is your settings in the ACR Output Options. Whatever you set there will be the color space used by ACR to open the image. To access the ACR Output Options, click on the blue underlined link right under the preview dialog box on ACR.

  • Gnome font settings not remembered

    I'm trying to change the font dpi from the right click menu on desktop, but after i log out and log back in the dpi setting is falling back to 92dpi( I'm trying to set it to 96), but other settings like hinting, subpixel rendering is not affected. I cant figure this out, are there any conf files that I can edit manually?

    What window manager - Gnome, KDE. XFCE, Openbox, etc.?
    DPI can be set in xorg.conf, and AFAIK it's the only place where it can be set as *two* values (horizontal and vertical), which is desirable for widescreen displays.
    $ xdpyinfo | grep -B1 dot
    dimensions: 1920x1080 pixels (372x231 millimeters)
    resolution: 131x119 dots per inch

  • Acrobat Color Management settings not holding

    I am having issues with acrobat 8 & 9 holding the color management  preferences on the intel macs we have. I have placed the .csf file in  user/library/application support/adobe/color/settings. The .icc profile  is in user/library/color sync/profiles. We are using OS 10.5.8 &  10.6.4 both versions are behaving the same. I have used bridge to sync  the Adobe suite (AI,Photoshop and Indesign) and that works fine. Acrobat was not installed as part of the suite.

    Figured out the issue. The .csf file was corrupt, remade the file and the settings held in prefernces.

  • Eye dropper settings not remembered in CS5

    My eyedropper tool used to work perfectly.   Everytime I'd take a sample of an element on the page, it would be applied to my selected object.  A few weeks ago, I started experimenting with the tool's eye dropper settings, turning things off and on, and now, the eye dropper setting appears to get reset each new work day I come it.  I can't get Illustrator to remember my eye dropper settings.  Strange...and annoying.
    Any help?
    Christian
    I'm using AI CS5 on the Mac 10.6.6. 

    Since I can't reproduce the problem here, at least so far in limited testing, I don't know where to point you or what might be affecting the frames in question. Can you copy a few of these frames onto a new page, verify that the problem still exists, then zip the page (you can delete the images, just leave the frames), and post it on a server someplace like YouSendIt.com, then post a link here?
    It might not be something that you can fix except by replacing the frames. If that's the case, it might be possible to script the replacement.
    Oh, I just thought of one other test. Have you tried cutting the image itself, using the direct select tool, and pasting into a new frame? that also will help isolate the problem as the frame.

  • Os x 10.10 display settings not remembered

    New Mac Pro 12-core running 10.10.2, main monitor is LG UM95 connected via thunderbolt, also a Panasonic TV connected via HDMI to the HDMI port. At every restart, the display settings revert to "mirrored" mode. How do I fix this?

    Try resetting the SMC and NVRAM
    Intel-based Macs: Resetting the System Management Controller (SMC)
    About NVRAM and PRAM

  • Proxy settings not remembered

    Im on firefox 3.6 and my problems is that i click on no proxy but everytime the computer restarts it resets to som these proxy settings.
    http 127.0.0.1 port 50370
    Now i've also tried the delete user.js file but this folder always reapears when i start up the computer again, possibly causing the proxy settings to change.
    this all started after a virus/adware. Now ive run malwarebytes and adaware plus Mcafee and they removed the virus as it no longer is causing any problems apart from this. Im also on windows 7.

    I've opened the user.js file with wordpad and here is its contenets if it helps solve this
    user_pref("network.cookie.cookieBehavior", 0);
    user_pref("privacy.clearOnShutdown.cookies", false);
    user_pref("security.warn_viewing_mixed", false);
    user_pref("security.warn_viewing_mixed.show_once", false);
    user_pref("security.warn_submit_insecure", false);
    user_pref("security.warn_submit_insecure.show_once", false);

  • Colour Management - who does what - Some thoughts now the smoke is clearing

    First up, thanks very much to everyone who contributed their ideas and expertise to my recent query here, when I was seeking help for a problem with colour management issues when printing a magazine I edit. I have a ton of suggestions  to work through and study but the smoke is slowly clearing and it raises some interesting points which I think are worth recounting.
    First of all, I have been editing short run magazines now for 25 years, at first part time and later on a professional contract basis.  I am not a trained graphic designer nor a trained printer. I did start out training as a graphic designer, many years ago but gave it up for a career in IT (as a networking specialist). That was full time until 10 years ago, although I did some freelance writing and editing in my spare time.
    And yes, I did start originally with scissors and cut and paste, and moved on through black and white with spot colour and Pagemaker software  to full colour and InDesign today. One thing which may be different about my experience to most of yours is that I am a PC user and always have been. All my editing and graphics work has always been done on a PC - Pagemaker was our DTP package of choice for a long time and we supplemented this with Corel-Draw (which has a range of graphics handling options). All my software is legal and I always register it and keep it up to date. I have used the same graphic designer for quite a few years now and whenever we upgrade our software he goes and gets trained on the latest release.
    Around 10 years ago I was offered the chance to edit a specialist short run magazine (not the current one). This was a chance I took and gave up the day job and became a full time freelance. Editing is not my main or only source of income. I am also  a freelance writer and photographer and heritage consultant and I have a specialist image library.   I sell my own sell my work - articles and pictures - to the national and local press. I also write books (non fiction) on commission. The magazine editing is really an extension of my interest in historic landscapes. I have never had any complaints, or problems, with the freelance work, photos and archived images I sell.  Clients include national newspapers here in the UK, national magazine groups and my books are available in national bookstore chains. I supply my work digitally, naturally, and it includes photos I have taken myself and items which I have scanned into my library of historical images and store on line. No reported colour management issues there.
    I have always enjoyed a good relationship with my publishers and printers because I seek to be as professional as possible, which means delivering my stuff on time, to the required standard so that minimum intervention is required from them. This does assume that I have a clear brief from them on what they need from me.
    Recently this approach has not been enough to avoid colour management issues with the short run magazine I currently edit. I have been wondering when  and where things went astray and date it back to the upgrade to InDesign two years ago. However it may have its roots in my earlier decision to use PCs not Macs for my work.
    Until 4 years ago I had used the same printers for magazine editing for many years. They were a well respected firm specialising in short run magazines. They were not far from where I live and work and if there was a problem I would go over and discuss it with them. They were happy, and competent, to handle Pagemaker files generated on a PC and convert my rgb images to cmyk if there was any concern about the colour balance. On a few occasions I paid them to scan a photo for me. However 4 years ago the owner decided to retire and shut up shop. I needed to find a new printers and it had to be someone who specialised in short run magazines and could meet the budget of the charity I edit for. Also someone who could handle copy generated using Pagemaker running on a PC. I chose a printers I had used briefly in the past  where I knew some of the staff and was promised PC based Pagemaker would not be a problem. I even got this in writing. I started to send them proofs generated using Pagemaker v7 on my PC.
    I soon found that although they had agreed they could handle Pagemaker on a PC in fact they had only a few PC based clients and were using a single ageing PC running Pagemaker to proof their work. In fact nearly all their jobs were Quark based. I was also told we had to supply CMYK images although not given any further requirement so I now did the conversions from rgb to CMYK using my PhotoPaint software. (There are quite a few settings in Corel for the conversion but there was no guidance  by the printer on which to use so to be honest it did not occur to me that it might be a problem).
    Now of course I understand that the drive to get customers to supply CMYK images was a Quark driven requirement back in the late 1990s. I did not and do not use Quark so knew nothing for this.  I did have some early colour problems and font incompatibilities with the new printers and was pressured by their senior Graphic Designer (who designed for their own contract clients) to upgrade to InDesign and provide them with a .pdf, which I was assured would solve all my problems. The .pdf would be the same as the final printed magazine because "it would not require any further intervention by the printers".
    I expect you are collectively throwing up your hands in horror at this point, but I think he was speaking genuinely. The creation of a .pdf  using InDesign, is widely promoted as the ultimate answer to all printing issues.   I have encountered it recently with a lot of printers' salesmen and my friend, who edits a learned journal, has just been told the same thing by her printers, to get her to upgrade to ID. Incidentally she also uses a PC.
    So we upgraded our design process in house to InDesign and our graphic designer went on a course, two courses in fact. When we came to produce our first .pdf using ID, the printers'  Senior Graphic designer came on the phone and talked our designer through the ID Export function. I think he may at that time have told him to create a preset profile with MPC and the defaults, but to be honest I don't recall. We were never sent anything in writing about what settings we needed to match theirs. I continued to have intermittant colour management problems but put this down to my photos. Things came to head with the most recent issue where the colours were badly out on the cover, supplied by a press agency and taken by a professional photographer. The printers seemed to have little or no idea about possible causes.
    Initially I thought that part of the underlying cause must lie in some mismatch between what I was sending the printers and what they expected to receive so I asked them to specify what I should send. All they said was use Profile preset as MPC setting and accept  the defaults which accompany it.
    So I came on here looking for a solution. A lot of people were keen to offer their own experience which I really appreciate. However the messages could be conflicting. Some of you suggested it was the underlying cover photo which was at fault, some that it was my monitor which needed better calibration.
    Many of you here said that part of the problem, if not the whole problem, was the way I was generating my CMYKs for the printer and I should use Photoshop to do this. You also mentioned a number of possible colour management settings which I should try.
    At times the advice seemed to change tack. There were suggestions that the colour management issues I had  were nothing to do with the printers, that it was up to me not them. Quite a lot of you said I needed to be better informed about Colour Management issues. I agree, but I had never had any previously (maybe good luck, maybe good support from my previous printer) so I was not even aware that I needed to be better informed.  Some of you mildly chastised me for not finding out more and doing more to manage my own colour management with the switch to ID. To which I can only say if I had needed to train up, I would have done. I did not realise I needed to.  Nor was my designer aware of the issues as colour management was not really covered on his ID courses which were about typesetting and design.
    Some of you even seemed to hint that unless I was prepared to use an expensive high end printer or effectively retrain as a print specialist or get my graphic designer to do so, then I probably shouldn't be in the magazine editing game at all. OK maybe that is a bit harsh but you get the drift.
    The fact is that printing is much more accessible these days to all sorts of people and in particular to people with PCs. My brother lives in a large village in an isolated area and produces a village magazine which has been a great success. It is in black and white with spot colour but he would like to move to an all colour issue. He is a bit nervous of the colour management issues as he has no experience of graphic design and is his own designer using a low end entry level design package. He too uses a PC. The printers reps all tell him the same thing they tell me, that all he needs to supply is a .pdf using InDesign.
    Somewhere I feel a black hole has developed, maybe back in the 1990s with Quark 4.11. A lot of printers standardised on that, and set up a work flow and prepress dependent on CMYK images as provided by the clients. They assumed the the clients would doing their own colour management. This approach also assumes everyone is using Quark on a Mac with the full range of Adobe software. When it became possible to generate .pdfs using InDesign, this was held out to users as the Holy Grail of magazine printing, even though their workflows and prepress were still based on Quark 4.11 principles. Any underlying colour management issues the clients now have to tackle themselves.
    So now we have the situation in which I find myself, having to learn from scratch a good deal about colour management issues so that I can tell the printers what is needed for my magazine. Meanwhile all the printing salesmen, the ones I encounter anyway, are still busy pushing the InDesign to .pdf as the "be all and end all" solution. Some re-education is needed for all parties I think.

    I am glad to see that the sun is peeping through the clouds.
    I apologise for my Aussie-style straight talk earlier, but as I said before it was not directed personally at you but in the direction of others whom you epitomize, repeating a conversation I have had many times over the last 10 years or so where respectable, well-meaning photographers, designers and other contributors refuse to accept that colour management is being thrust upon them.
    It is a simple fact of life, there is this 'new' thing that has butted into the very root of our trades and changed the most basic principles of printing and photography.  We expect that this kind of thing does not happen but the industry we now work in is not the same one we trained in twenty years ago.
    Many printers are still struggling with the same conflict, so many tradespeople cannot accept this change.
    This is exacerbated by the fact that colour management is so complicated to learn and implement and confounded by the fact that the default settings and a clumsy workflow often yield acceptable results with incorrect, generic settings, hence the old 'use InDesign and make a PDF and it will be ok' route.
    When the chain of colour management includes the photographer, the photographer's client, the designer, the other designer maybe, the prepress person, and the platemaker, and a single incorrect click by any one of those can kill the CM it is not surprising that in the end when someone is looking back to see where it fell over they usually never find out.....   They will meet someone who says ' I never touched it, I simply opened the file and scaled it and closed it'.  And that person will be a reputable photographer or designer (and CLIENT) who has no idea they just broke it.  So what do we do?  We go with the generic setting that seems to yield adequate results therefore avoiding the confrontation. 
    You need to understand the situation of the printer who took his business through the 'early' days of colour management, we had all kinds of very reputable sources supplying incorrect files, we did not have the expertise yet to be able to address the entire workflow, it would have meant training photographers and designers all through the best design houses and national institutions, because they blamed the printer.  Only in the last few years have I seen these people coming around to the fact that they bear responsibility for implementing their own cm and maintaining it through their own work.
    Sadly, many high end sources are still not there, and I mean HIGH end!  Probably the ones that don't even visit this forum because they want to keep blaming the printer... They tend to live with the poor quality reproductions and just pull up the worst ones and fiddle with those and try to avoid the 'elephant in the room'.
    I am sorry to say that it was not practical for a printer to reject mismanaged files for fear of losing clients who would happily accept less than perfect results in order to avoid the painful truth that was being told to them.  The best thing we could do was to gently make those clients aware that their workflow was imperfect and hope to show them how we could help...  Many print shops do not have someone knowledgeable enough or patient enough to do this, or the boss does not understand the issue either and tries to work around it to keep his jobs flowing in the expectation that all those experts in the chain will eventually tame the thing.
    The many experts on this holy forum are waaaaayyyy ahead of the printing industry in general and photographers and designers in general in their understanding of colour management workflow.  I have seen first hand how reputable local industry people and trainers alike are spreading misinformation and bad techniques, when I discovered these forums back in about 2002 I found that they opened up a whole new galaxy of knowledge and facts that actually worked and made sense, unlike what I had been told locally....  This forum taught me what the Adobe text books did not, the Tech' teachers did not, local 'experts' did not! 
    I tell all interested people to join these forums and learn to discriminate between the good and bad information.

  • Error: Suite Color Management is not enabled | Bridge CS6

    When i go to Edit > Creative Suite Colour Settings in Adobe Bridge, I am receiving the following error:  "Suite Colour Management is not enabled. Suite Colour Management requires that a qualifying product has been launched at least once to enable this feature. Then I searched this issue in Google and I got a solution from the link http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/error-suite-color-management-enabled.html . I did all instructions one by one but my issue still not resolved. i purchased this license very recently From Al suwaidi computers
    Photoshop version is : Photoshop CS6 .kindly help me to resolve this issue

    Hi Curt ,
    I have already purchased adobe Photoshop cs6 13.0 MLP AOO License and illustrator CS6 13.0 MLP AOO License (i have selected to install all packages along with this ). i did all set up as per the instructions that post by adobe  http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/error-suite-color-management- enabled.html but still i cannot access creative suite color settings it says the same message ..
    "   Suite Color Management is not enabled. Suite Color Management requires that a qualifying product has been launched at least once to enable this feature "
    Info:-
    I am using a Z820 workstation with NVidia graphics but it not showing any hardware related errors
    Regards,
    Sangeeth Sagar,

  • Colour management - embedded profiles

    Could anyone assist as I haven't had this problem in CS5 photoshop but when I upgraded to CS6 photoshop I followed the recommended settings like using ProPhoto RBG.
    I edit in the working space colour management but not always have the same results on screen...have calibrated my monitor.
    Then when it does look correct on screen and I re-import into Photoshop, my picture turns out bright red and I need to use Adobe RBG (1998).  I am saving the pictures with the profile embedded, works better with Adobe RBG.
    What should I be using as the settings as well as management policies - currently Preserve Embedded Profiles?
    I don't want to have nice looking pictures in Photoshop and then have them print incorrectly or look terrible on another monitor.
    Thanks

    it would be more accurate to say that the Working RGB is "Assumed" not Assigned...assigning is an action of tagging the image.
    Hi, Jeff, I concede your point.
    If I recall correctly, Bruce and color.org also favor that terminology?
    Though as a non-technical writer targeting beginners, I prefer to use "in essence," "for practical purposes" Photoshop is "Assigning" its default/working space under c.pfaffenbichler's scenario because it has the same end effect -- the proof is -- manually Edit> Assign Profile (working space) and the source RGB Converts to Monitor RGB and Print Space exactly the same as c.pfaffenbichler's approach (or is that not correct?).
    But I do believe everyone here agrees that THE CORRECT SOURCE PROFILE MUST ALWAYS BE ASSUMED OR ASSIGNED BEFORE PHOTOSHOP CAN FAITHFULLY CONVERT/TRANSFORM SOURCE COLORS TO MONITOR RGB, DESTINATION PROFILES OR SPECIFIC PRINT SPACES.
    For me, I think my loose "Assign" terminology is easier to visualize and demonstrate in a learning environment (at least it was for me to grasp or describe the concept in an active, visual sense).
    On the other hand, I think "Assume" better suits OSX and Windows engineering assumptions the monitor is an sRGB-compliant device in an unmanaged viewing environment -- but that's just how I choose to present my theories.
    As always, I prefer a shredding if I am wrong or unclear because my goal is to get it right and to the point...
    G BALLARD

  • Colour Management & Dot Gain

    Im looking for clarification on how i should approach colour management settings when my rip compensates for dot gain for the different paper types.
    I am sending litho plates out via a pdf based workflow utilising a harlequin rip.
    My questions..
    If my workflow (harlequin rip) is calibrated to adjust for dot gain depending on different paper types ( FOGRA Coated/Uncoated) should i then just be sending files to it that are not tagged with profiles/colourmanaged to prevent multiple conversions?
    Should i colour manage pre-rip and allow for dot gain (2 conversions) or is only 1 or the other necessary?
    For example...
    1. I am assigning a FOGRA coated profile to my images in photshop
    2. Then placing my image in my indesign layout and exporting it to pdf using FOGRA coated settings
    3. pdf is then dropped into the workflow
    4. pdf is ripped and dot gain allowance is applied
    5. Plate is then outputted
    Any thoughts please
    Andy barrington
    www.barringtonprint.com

    I'd want to see your InDesign Color Settings.  The RIP should have a choice in its calibration methods whether to honor .icc profiles and application settings.  So, hypothetically if you feed it a PDF job that includes profiles and honors existing application color setups ( PS, Ai, ID, etc., etc. ) and the RIP is set to honor app color settings and profiles, then no duplication of dot gain adjustment will take place.  If the RIP is set to not honoring app color settings and/or profiles, then it will adjust for dot gain.  Look into your RIP's calibration and whether or not it honors application color settings and .icc profiles.  Should it somehow apply a second round of dot gain adjustments, then deselect dot gain adjustments in your desktop applications.  You only need dot gain adjustment done once.

  • Photoshop 7 Colour Management Problem (WinXP)

    Hi,
    I just a problem studio while swapping over 2 Windows XP machines, having swapped over the 1st PC Photoshop 7 lost it's colour management settings.
    All images viewed now appeared hazey to the user. So we swapped the PCs back to the original monitor however the colour settings we are prompted for
    when opening Photoshop 7 have now been lost..
    We tried alll the colour management templates listed but these are not right.
    Is there away we can restore the original settings? Could these settings be saved in a file somewhere on the PCs hard disk?
    Thanks in advanced.

    The color settings should be in C:\Documents and Settings\Anita\Application Data\Adobe\Photoshop 7\ somewhere or they are in Photoshop's program directory under a Presets\Color folder
    Mylenium

  • Photoshop CS6 Colour Management Printing issue

    Hi,
    We use Photoshop and 2 x Epson 9800 printers to print our images, we used to use CS4 and have recently upgraded to CS6.
    We are having a problem with the “Colour Management” settings in the Printer Settings window. We choose for Photoshop to Manage Colours and select our ICC profile and Rendering Intent and Black Point. Our problem is that these settings reset each time we switch between our 2 printers back to “Photoshop Manages Colours” so we have keep selecting the same settings over and over again. This never happened on CS4.
    How do we save these settings so that they do not reset each time we switch between printers.
    I don’t think it has any relevance but we have our printer’s settings set to “No Colour Management” as the warning states.
    Kind Regards
    Steven

    You possibly need to add the profiles for your printer first.
    In LR select 'other' in the profile dropdown for the color managment. In the list check all the profiles you need for your printer.
    When you select a printer profile in LR and let LR manage the colors make sure to turn off the color management in your printer driver settings.
    HTH
    Franz

Maybe you are looking for