Commitment calculation partial reception of Services PO

Due to the Public Sector Management implementation, we changed our customizing setting it like this in SPRO and CUNI transaction:
CUNI:
Application parameters:
x Commercial meas. unit
SPRO:
Material Management - External Services Management - Source Determination and Default values - For Client:
x Service line level commitments.
This solved our issues for documents generated after the change of configuration, before this, commitments were incorrectly consumed entirely when posting a partial reception of services purchase orders.
The problem we are having right now is that we are identifying different behaviors in the commitment calculation between:
1) Purchase orders generated before changing customizing.
2) Purchase orders generated after the change in customizing.
In the first one, the partial reception reduced entirely the purchase order commitment (table COOI) and in the second one commitment was calculated correctly after a partial reception.
Additionally, we tried to fix the commitment calculation by using the RKANBU01 program, but it does not work as long as we maintain the unit of measurement u2018EAu2019 as u2018Commercial measurement unitu2019 in CUNI transaction.
Can somebody help me understand why this happens, meaning why does the system behave differently in these two cases having the same setting in customizing right now.
Thanks in advance.
Kind Regards!

Hi,
If all 5 services line item are include in single service entry sheet document, then you can't delete single service line item.
But your service entry sheet documents are different for all service line item then you can delete any one service entry sheet with ML81N.
Note: - Invoice documents is not generated against your service entry sheet documents.
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Similar Messages

Standard Program for Retirement Calculation or Year of Service

Hi,
I like to know whether there is any standard report program for Retirement Calculation or Year of Service. If it is available please share it ..

Year of service s_ph9_46000216
or u can run flexible employee data S_AHR_61016363, select seniority, date of entry etc
S_L9C_94000095 choose employment status 'retiree'

Derivation of Commitment Item from Material and Services codes

Hi experts,
I need to derivate a Commitment Item from Material and Services codes, because the many material and services are related with the same financial account.
I have seen that material codes appears in Source Fields, but service codes not.
Can you indicate me if exist some option to derivate commitment item from Services Codes?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards,
José Luis

Hi,
You can add fields to the source:
https://scn.sap.com/thread/1969599
Regards,
Ming

Partial credit for Service Entry

Hi
I have captured a service entry with a value of 5000. I have yet to capture the invoice. I now get a credit for the same service for 2000. How do I do a partial credit against that service entry. I hope this is not to consfusing as it is whilst Im typing it out.
Vishnu

Hi,
First do Invoice for 5000...
as you have credit for the Same Service..
Now do Credit memo Against the invoice for 2000...
Thx
Raju

Partial billing on service order

Hi guru,
I have a quick question: I have a service order ( no delivery involved.) Can I still do partial billing against sales order?
In this case, sales order 's confirmed quantity is grayed out. invoice quantity is copied from sales order confirmed quantity is also grayed out.
I would like to be able to enter the quantity on the invoice anytime by the business? Is this possible?
Thanks

Hello,
Go to VF01, select your billing type, enter the order number, click on the selection list, check whther you are able to change the quantity to be billed or not?
Prase

Date&time Calculation with respect to Service&Response Profile

Hi all,
The scenario is - we are creating service request which is having service profile and response profile , according to these the First response time and to do by time are getting calculated. In this calculation system is considering the week ends,working hours per day and holidays ( which are defined in customizing).
Now i want to do the same kind of calculation for some other purpose. like i have two timestamps i want to find exact time difference between those two by considering service profile and response profile.
Example:
Let's consider my service profile is 5X8 ( Mon - Friday and 8 hours per Day 09:00:00 to 17:00:00)
and the response profile is 10X15 ( response should be in 10 hours and to be completed by 15 Hours )
Suppose I'm creating the Service request by 23.03.2010 09:00:00 then system will give the response time like
24.03.2010 11:00:00 ( on or before )
( it took 8 hours from 23.03.2010 and 2 hours from 24.03.2010 )
Please give idea to get this logic how system calculates by considering service profile and response profile.
Regards
Chand

Hi chand,
Whateever logic you have told is 80 % correct. But you also need to consider the following thing.
1. You need to define the factoy calender cosidering the holiday in the t code SCAL. and that need to be attched to your service profile
2. Suppose your first respose time is 10 hours and 1st resolution time is 15 hours, it also needs to consider the holidays.
Eg. if the Service call come on friday at 3.00PM , then the resopnse should go by Monday 5.00PM. Response will be by 2.00 PM on Tuesday (Provided these days are not the hoildays).
Hope this clears your doubts.
Regards,
Uday Borse

Iphone 5 reception- no service with case on

Okay, so lately I have had a problem with getting LTE and having NO service in places where I used to. I didn't put two and two together until my friend (whom when I bought 2 cases off ebay I gave her one) said that she wasn't getting service either until she took her case off! These cases we bought are just plain plastic cases (with a sparkly back) so i'm wondering if there is a reason why this is happening? Or if anyone else has had this issue? Or if there is any complaints out there about the reception on the 5's? I love the case, it ***** that I will have to take it off to take care of the problem !

Buy a different case. The case being used is obviously interferring with the antenna.

EE is committed to providing excellent "Customer Service"

I act on behalf of the account holder, my sister Ms Katharine ***** who is unable to deal with the account due to being registered with mental illness. She has difficulty processing too much information and at times back ground noise and general conversation can confuse her. Therefore things like dealing with bills and accounts, filing in forms and understanding what is happening around her, can be difficult. With this in mind I act on her behalf for all her accounts, mobile, broadband, Tv, Gas Electric etc.
She has been an EE customer for 20 months now and only has a rolling one month Mobile Broadband account with EE. She is not a phone customer.
I raised a complaint against a member of staff Ms ****** ***** because she contacted me to appologise for another member of staff who implied they didn't need to deal with me as I wasn't the account holder even though I am named on the account and have only ever been the person who deals with the account. After appologising for that member of staff Ms ***** then proceeded to fabricate details concerning the account and make things up on the telephone as the call proceeded. Bearing in mind she is calling me from the "customer relations" department and has all the time in the world to check the account, confirm accurate details and then call me in her own time, I saw no reason for her to "wing it" and make it up as she went along. I asked her twice if she had checked the account details before calling me and I was twice given the response "thats irrelivant". She clearly wantd to avoid answering that reasonable question. I could clearly tell she had not checked the account and this made the situation more complicated and worse. This was dissapointing considering she was supposed to be calling to resolve an issue and was a representative from the Customer Relations department. Several things she stated during the call did not ring true and it was clear she had called unprepared and was fabricating certain things or making them up as she went along. On this basis I called EE back after she hung up with the intent to raise a complaint against her as I felt Customer Relations should be resolving issues, not making them worse.
Initially when calling EE on Wednesday the 1st July 2015 and speaking to customer services in Darlington, I was told I would be put through to Customer Relations and speak to Ms ****** *****s manager Ms ****** *********.
After explaining that I wished to raise a complaint, I was put on hold while awaiting transfer to the Customer Relations department. On that day alone I was on the phone for 2hours and 34minutes mostly on hold and being transfered between the departments of Darlington, South Wales, New Delhi and North Tyne. I never got through to customer relations. Eventually I was told by a Manager in North Tyne that they would get through to Customer Relations for me and then call me back that day, to save me being on hold any longer. The call back from EE never happened that day. Something I expected as I had been told this four times in the past over the last 20 months and those call backs never happend either. I chased the matter up the following day on Thursday the 2nd of July and that day I spent 2 hours and 17 minutes on the phone. Again mostly on hold or being transfered between departments. Again I was promised a callback later that day and again that never happened that day. An email was sent to the Customer relations department requesting that they contact me directly. I did get through to the "Complaints Escalation" department but they refused to transfer me to the Customer Resolutions department even though thats where three previous staff members said they were transfering me and even confirmed the name of the Manager of that department so there is no confsuion. Needless to say I refused the offer off the call back that hadn't happened on the two previous days or on the four other occassions in the past 20 months. And to be clear I was told that someone would call me back "today".
On Friday the 3rd of July I called again as I had received no reply and spent just over 1hour and 10minutes on the phone. This time I spoke to a lovely Lady called R*** M*** in South Wales and she was extremely polite and genuine which was refreshing and completely unEE like. Although she was unable to help due to the way in which EE set up its complaints system, she was very considerate and understanding of my frustration after 6 hours on the phone over 3 days and still getting nowhere.
On Wednesday the 8th July I received a call back from the original department I was supposed to be put through to (Customer Relations) and spoke to the Manager ******* ******** who was quick to point out that she had "just received the email" sent on Thursday the 2nd of July and was pressing in getting accross her point that she had replied quickly to the email knowing the call was recorded.
The call lasted 30 minutes and I felt from the moment she called, her aim was about resolving the issue with the intent of "closing the complaint" by offering money or requesting "what I would like" as a resolution. I clearly stated the experiences I had over the past three days to raise a complaint and the just over 6 hours on the phone to EE. Again the focus seemed to be to get to the end of the call and close the complaint via an obvious cash offer. On numerous occasions she seemed to want to lead the conversation in that direction yet showed little interest in the actual complaint. It wasn't until I asked her to accomplish what she had initially called me about, namely to listen to my complaint, that she stopped talking and actually listened. Prior to her call three managers, 2 in North Tyne and 1 in Greenoch near Glasgow all stated that the original call I received "would be listened to" and checked for the things I stated in the complaint. Unsurprisingly, when I asked at the end of Ms *******s call, what she made of the conversation when she listned to it, she told me she hadn't listened to it and was unable to, contradicting the three other managers.
When raising the complaint with ****** in North Tyne, he informed me he was taking the matter seriously and was going to raise an internal complaint as per protocal and the Ombudsmans guidelines. I spent just under 15 minutes talking with him. At the end of that call, after he asked "is there anything else I can help you with today", I asked him what the complaint was about. He couldn't tell me and started to list things he was trying to remember from the conversation but none were the actual thing I brought to his attention in the first place. Therefore, how do you take the matter seriously and raise an internal complaint if you can't remember what it is? I seriously doubt that these "internally raised complaints" actually happen and it is convenient just to say they do so that the customer can then be told "but we can't discuss the results with you due to privacy and work environment practices".
I spoke to New Delhi twice while being passed from pilar to post and the line was very bad when being transfered from North Tyne and New Delhi offered to call me back. I explained to the first chap that he couldn't call a mobile broadband device as it is not a phone but the guy persisted and needless to say I received no call back. Ten minutes later, exactly the same situation and this time the chap asked for my mobile number. I gave it to him and he replied "thats not an EE number, sorry I can't help you". He then asked me why I was calling if that wasn't an EE number. I explained the account concerned a mobile broadband device and he said again, "Sorry I can't help you" and terminated the call.
Also while trying to raise the complaint I was told twice that I wasn't the customer. Obviously some people may need the assistance of a carer, social worker, community nurse or family member to help them. This is lost on EE. When they don't know how to handle a complaint, or their hands are tied by interanl system structure or they get caught lying, they resort to the tactic of asking to speak to the account holder or telling me I am not the account holder.
I have also been told on three occasions that I was being transfered to a department that I could not be transfered to. Two managers later told me I should not have been told this and that it is impossible to transfer me to that department. There were numerous other things that happened during the 6 hours on the phone to EE. If I put them in this statement, you wouldn't believe me and think I was making it up. Then again, this EE and I have read some of the other statements on here.... and they don't suprise me either.
I was offered £10 on the account for my time on the phone by a manager. By that point I really didn't care at all or bother to wuestion if it had actually been put on the account. I declined any credit or cash offer from Ms ******* ***** in her call back as I felt the service was so appauling and the structure of making a complaint to lengthy and unreasonable. I didn't wish to be just another complaint "satisfactorily deal with" by being "paid off". I have also experienced such customer service in the past and was offered a £10 goodwill gesture. It is clear to me that EE resolve complaints and internal issues by paying off customers (they call it resolving issues), rather than properly handling complaints and taking them seriously. EEs complaints system is "designed" to be difficult to raise a complaint or raise it to another level. Something the Ombudsman brought to their attention in the recent fine they gave to EE. Clearly EE wouldn't have so many complaints if it provided a customer service that was fair and easy to use and had little to complain about in the first place. Even during the call back I was told that Vodaphone was most complained about company, yet the statistics from the Ombudsman for 2015 clearly show that EE has received the most complains concerning Broadband. The thing I was calling about. Even during a callback to resolve an issue, EE still were trying say someone else was worse and deflect attention.
I was very, very happy to see the £1 million pound fine they received from the Ombudsman on Friday. Before I am insulted by any more EE staff memebers, who tell me I have the right to leave at any time, as happened twice while raising the complaint, I'd like to point out that I am happy with the product and the price I pay for it. The Product isn't the problem. It's the Customer Service.
Just because I am happy with the product, it doesn't mean I forfeit my right to complain about reasonable issues. In short I feel, TalkTalk are just inept and a bit clueless whereas Everything Everywhere and deceitful and intentionally pervasive when handling complaints. I also feel that the actual amount of complaints may be far higher than the statistics show and that customers give up complaining when being left on hold for so long or realising the complaints procedure is worthless and too difficult to use. This then keeps the amount of complaints lower than they actually are.
The service I received trying to raise a reasonable complaint was atrocious and in My personal view, clearly reflects why so many EE customers complain about the company and the Ombudsman fined it so heavily. Clearly they have not learnt their lesson, despite their statement on Friday that that fine was for past issues. I would happily see EEs licence to opperate removed or atleast brought in to question based on this and other customers experiences. If you have a complaint, don't let EE tell you, "its only you" or "its just your opinion". It isn't.... And the Ombudsman says so.
This was easily the worse Customer Service experience I have ever had in my life.
8th July 2015

Hi ,
I am very sorry for all the problems you have stated in the post.
Can you advise me what the query was? I will try help as best I can.
Thanks.

Partial cancellation of service entry sheet

Dear Friends,
I have created a open Service Purchase Order with Service limits. I have done service entry sheet for quantity (lets say 49) with some value. I have done invoice for 45 quantity only with respect to service entry sheet. Now I came to know that the correct quantity is only 45 and not 49 in numbers. Now I would like to reverse the 4 nos. quantity at service entry sheet level.
Could you please let me know the correct procedure to solve the above issue.
Regards,
Dwarak

Hi buddy,
If it is not at the organisation...I mean at the client side ..
go to T/c MIR4 give the invoice no..and delete the Invoice first or
go tto t/c MR8m and Cancel the invoice doc..
then come back to ML 81n..
give the SES No..say Revoke acceptance ( there is Invverse Arrow above )...Like a Ancor..
Once you Revoke acceptance Of Services ...GRN for whole 49 pieces will get cancel..
know create once again SES by ML81N...include quantity 45 and Proceed for invoicing
Thanks and Regards
Adarsh Srivastava

Error While Commiting .PAK files from ODDC Services

Hi
I am trying to scan and commit documents using ODDC client. I am able to successfully send the Document from Remote Location and corresponding .PAK files are also created but when ODDC services try to process and Commit the document, i get following errors:
***Error*** Failed to process batch 36137617_36138113. Error Number: 40008, Error: Failed to commit batch (with delete). Commit Profile - ecm: The following error was reported by ReleaseDocument. Error Number: 20004 Error Description: HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
I also get following error in another file:
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Document file name is C:\Oracle\ODC\Batches\008\0000000J\0000000J_1.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Begin Check In Process.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Idc service = CHECKIN_UNIVERSAL.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Parsing xml to obtain fields data.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO dDocTitle: W2 Company.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO dDocType: HRW2COMP.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Field DocAuthor: weblogic.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO dSecurityGroup: Public.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Field xCompanyName: sys.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Field xCompanyNo: 345.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO Field xYear: 1980.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO dDocAuthor: weblogic.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO dDocAccount: .
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 INFO primaryFile: C:\Oracle\ODC\Batches\008\0000000J\0000000J.1.
Tue Dec 27 01:04:46 HST 2011 SEVERE Failed to check in document. Exception: {0}. Error is: oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.http.HttpProtocolException: HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
     at oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.http.IdcHttpProtocol.writeRequest(IdcHttpProtocol.java:171)
     at oracle.stellent.ridc.IdcClient.sendRequest(IdcClient.java:140)
     at com.oracle.capture.UCM11g.Driver.checkIn(Driver.java:192)
     at com.oracle.capture.UCM11g.ComDriver.checkIn(ComDriver.java:42)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at com.jniwrapper.win32.com.server.IDispatchServer.invoke(SourceFile:209)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at com.jniwrapper.win32.com.server.CoInterfaceVTBL$VirtualMethodCallback.b(SourceFile:232)
     at com.jniwrapper.win32.com.server.CoInterfaceVTBL$VirtualMethodCallback.callback(SourceFile:135)
     at com.jniwrapper.Callback.enterPoint(SourceFile:222)
     at com.jniwrapper.Function.invokeCFunc(Native Method)
     at com.jniwrapper.FunctionCall.a(SourceFile:126)
     at com.jniwrapper.FunctionCall.call(SourceFile:34)
     at com.jniwrapper.Function.invoke(SourceFile:188)
     at com.jniwrapper.Function.invoke(SourceFile:212)
     at com.jniwrapper.win32.MessageLoopThread$LoopThread.run(MessageLoopThread.java:489)
I would appreciate if someone can help me in the same as it's too urgent and i have tried almost everything but no luck.
Regards
ACM

There is just another post with similar issues: UCM 11g + RIDC (no resolution)
However, my guesses are that the problem lies is RIDC rather than ODDC. If you are experienced enough, you could try to create a simple RIDC program checking in a document and chances are it will end up with the same error. I also guess that problem could actually be related to RIDC configuration in Enterprise Manager - unlike in 10g, in 11g you have to explicitly enable RIDC communcations - check e.g. here how to do it: http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2011/02/bpm-portal-11g-ps3-how-to-configure.html
I'm afraid I have no other clue.

Partial cancellation of service entry line items (ML81N)

Hi Sap Gurus,
Suppose 5 service lines in a PO, Passed service enrty sheet for all 5 services, done LIV for only 4 services. i wan cancel 1 service line which is passed already.
Thanks in advance,
Vinod

Hi,
If all 5 services line item are include in single service entry sheet document, then you can't delete single service line item.
But your service entry sheet documents are different for all service line item then you can delete any one service entry sheet with ML81N.
Note: - Invoice documents is not generated against your service entry sheet documents.
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Partial Solution:Web Service Data Controls don't refresh properly.

I am runing JDeveloper Studio Edition 10.1.3.2.0.4066
I have developed several Web Service Data Controls and pages to use them to display output. The pages seem to have a problem refreshing output when the value of the input parameter is changed, but only once data has been successfully fetched once.
I have tried several settings for the refresh attribute:
IfNeeded: retrieves data only once. Even if other valid values are put in, displays same data. Values that would retrieve no data show a blank screen UNTIL a data set is retrieved, then goes to same data displayed instead of blank form.Scrolls through multiple records. This is true for every option which has IfNeeded in the name
Always: retrieves different data every time the parameter value changes. If the parameter value would result in no data being retrieved, the screen displays the last data retrieved with another value instead of blank. Scrolling is broken because every time I hit the navigation buttons, the screen refreshes and puts the current row back at the first record.
PrepareModel: retrieves different data every time the parameter value changes. If the parameter value would result in no data being retrieved, the screen displays the last data retrieved with another value instead of blank. It will scroll thru records, but every couple of records I get this error:
JBO-35007: Row currency has changed since the user interface was rendered. The expected row key was oracle.jbo.Key[1 ]
RenderModel: Same as IfNeeded.
This is the wsdl I used to build the data control:
http://ceres.dscr.dla.mil:8888/orabpel/default/Rqn/1.0/Rqn?wsdl
Here are the results from the wsdl:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <definitions name="Rqn" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Rqn" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Rqn" xmlns:ns1="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/Rqn" xmlns:plnk="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/05/partner-link/" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:client="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Rqn">
<import namespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/Rqn" location="RqnService.wsdl" />
- <types>
- <schema attributeFormDefault="qualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Rqn" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
- <element name="RqnProcessRequest">
- <complexType>
- <sequence>
<element name="input" type="string" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
- <element name="RqnProcessResponse">
- <complexType>
- <sequence>
<element name="result" type="string" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</schema>
</types>
- <message name="RqnRequestMessage">
<part name="payload" element="ns1:RqnServiceSelect_p_nsnInputParameters" />
</message>
- <message name="RqnResponseMessage">
<part name="payload" element="ns1:RqnAllTabCollection" />
</message>
- <portType name="Rqn">
- <operation name="process">
<input message="tns:RqnRequestMessage" />
<output message="tns:RqnResponseMessage" />
</operation>
</portType>
- <binding name="RqnBinding" type="tns:Rqn">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
- <operation name="process">
<soap:operation style="document" soapAction="process" />
- <input>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
- <service name="Rqn">
- <port name="RqnPort" binding="tns:RqnBinding">
<soap:address location="http://ceres.dscr.dla.mil:8888/orabpel/default/Rqn/1.0" />
</port>
</service>
- <plnk:partnerLinkType name="Rqn">
- <plnk:role name="RqnProvider">
<plnk:portType name="tns:Rqn" />
</plnk:role>
</plnk:partnerLinkType>
This is the pageDef file for the output page:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<pageDefinition xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adfm/uimodel"
version="10.1.3.40.66" id="showRqnPageDef"
Package="app1.pageDefs">
<parameters/>
<executables>
<variableIterator id="variables" Refresh="always"/>
<methodIterator id="processIter" Binds="process.result"
DataControl="ceresRqn" RangeSize="10"
BeanClass="ceresRqn.process" Refresh="ifNeeded"/>
<accessorIterator id="RqnAllTabIterator" RangeSize="10" Binds="RqnAllTab"
DataControl="ceresRqn"
BeanClass="ceresRqn.process.RqnAllTab"
MasterBinding="processIter" Refresh="ifNeeded"/>
<invokeAction id="qryRqn" Binds="process" Refresh="renderModel"/>
</executables>
<bindings>
<methodAction id="process" InstanceName="ceresRqn" DataControl="ceresRqn"
MethodName="process" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="999"
IsViewObjectMethod="false"
ReturnName="ceresRqn.methodResults.ceresRqn_process_result">
<NamedData NDName="p_nsn" NDValue="${processScope.holdNsn}"
NDType="java.lang.String" NDOption="2"/>
</methodAction>
<attributeValues id="boStatus" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="boStatus"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="dob" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="dob"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="docDate" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="docDate"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="dorraRecTyp" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="dorraRecTyp"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="extractDate" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="extractDate"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="matlRcptAcknDt" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="matlRcptAcknDt"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="modeShp" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="modeShp"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="nsn" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="nsn"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="quantity" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="quantity"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="rdd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="rdd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="sapSalesDoc" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="sapSalesDoc"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="sapSalesDocItm" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="sapSalesDocItm"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="sapSchdlLin" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="sapSchdlLin"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="sapSchdlLinDt" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="sapSchdlLinDt"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="shpdDt" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="shpdDt"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="shpdQty" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="shpdQty"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="statusCd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="statusCd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="suffix" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="suffix"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzdmdCd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzdmdCd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzfundCd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzfundCd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zznonStdRdd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zznonStdRdd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzorigDocNbr" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzorigDocNbr"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzpriCd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzpriCd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzprojCd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzprojCd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzsigCd" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzsigCd"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<attributeValues id="zzsuppAdrs" IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="zzsuppAdrs"/>
</AttrNames>
</attributeValues>
<action id="First" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="12"
IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator"/>
<action id="Previous" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="11"
IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator"/>
<action id="Next" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="10"
IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator"/>
<action id="Last" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="13"
IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator"/>
<action IterBinding="RqnAllTabIterator" id="Execute"
InstanceName="ceresRqn.process.return.RqnAllTab"
DataControl="ceresRqn" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="2"/>
</bindings>
</pageDefinition>
Any help would be welcome.
Message Header was edited by:
sdnelson

After adding a refresh condition, RefreshCondition="${adfFacesContext.postback == false}", to the invokeAction for the Execute operation, I was able to query new data when the parameter changed, and maintain correct scrolling behavior. Thanks to Oracle's Chintan Shah for helping me confirm this solution.
However, I still have a problem. If I get a set of data and then pass a parameter which would cause the web service to return no data (a null result set), the screen displays the old set of data rather than a blank screen. Does anyone have a solution to this problem?

Calculation of years of service

Hi All,
I need to add one field in the report, Tenure/Years of service.
How can i get that. Do i need to build some logic in report to calculate service years from date of hire from It0041 or is it standardly available?
Regards
Aryan

Hi Aryan,
Please use this below function module to fetch the number of years of service details..
HR_ECM_GET_SERVICE_TIME.
importing parameter : Pernr
I hope this will slove your problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh R K

Partial Dollar Credit - Service Contracts

Does anyone know how to issue a credit out of service contracts that is for a dollar amount only? We have a situation where the customer was already billed for the contract now they want a price adjustment credit. They do not want us to credit and rebill because they have entered the invoices in their system already. We need to be able to issue a dollar amount credit without terminating the lines on the contract. Does anyone have any suggestions on how this can be done?
Thanks.

Obviously the best way to do this to create a manual credit memo in AR and apply against the invoice which was wrongly billed to the customer so that the customer does not have to pay for this. If the customer has already paid, they this will go on account credit.
Thanks
Nagamohan

Due date calculation from GR Date / Service entry sheet date

Dear Friends,
GRN Date--01.05.2009
Payment terms--- Within 45 days due net
Transaction code---FBL1N
System should not output these records before 14.06.2009 in FBL1N.
It should ouput on or after 14.06.2009.
Regards
R Panda
Edited by: Rutabhadra Panda on Jun 2, 2009 9:18 AM

Hi
Try with payment terms option
SPRO- SAP IMG- Material Management - Purchasing - Vendor Master - Define terms of payment
regards,
Raman

Commitment calculation partial reception of Services PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for