Common reference based on Item Combination

Hi,
I had a scenario where i need to create a unique reference based on Item and org combination.
Eg:
Item Org Common
Item1 A1 001
Item2 A2 002
Basesd on Item and Org Combination i need to generate a common reference value. Can some one help me out how to get this.
Thanks.

Hi,
user11186474 wrote:
Hi Frank,
The data i will be having is for ever item and org combination i need to create a common reference value.
For Eg:
I have ItemA in Ai org for this item and org combination in need to create item a item and org combination..similarly for itemB and A2 org i need to create one more common reference.. this goes on for every item and org combination.
The output of my table will look like this
Item Org Reference
ItemA A1 0001
ItemB B1 002
For Every Item and org combination i need to generate a unique reference value.In the above i need to generate a common reference value.So what's wriong with the query I posted earleir?
If you want leading 0's so that the derived column always has 3 digits, then use TO_CHAR.
if you want the output to sometimes have 4 digits (like '0001') and sometimes 3 digits (like '002') then use CASE.

Similar Messages

How to Create a Cross Reference of an item in an E-Business Suite

Hi ,
I need Help ,how to Create a cross reference of an item in an E-Business Suite
Regards
Srini

Hello Srini,
Prerequisite to create a cross reference for an item in eBusiness suite is that the item should be created in the master organization and assigned to your organization.
Navigate to screen Inventory > Items > Cross references. Enter a name for your cross reference.
Then, click on Assign : a screen is opened. In this screen, you can enter Item and Cross reference value. Note that a cross reference can be defined for an organization or common to all organizations.
Another kind of cross reference you can create is Customer item (it defines how a customer designates your item). It can be defined through screen
Inventory > Customer item > Customer Item and Customer item cross references.
Please refer to Inventory user guide for more detail about this functionalities.

Calculating reference based sum in variety of tables

Hello there.
Can anybody tell me if there is a way to calculate reference based sum in variety of tables?
For example - I've got a sheet with some tables in it. There are header row and header column in each table. Each header column contains various items and the column next to it contains numeric value for theese items. Some items are repeating throughout the different tables.
So, I'd like to make a master table that would contain the total value of each repetitive item without using table identifier in the formulas, because the number of tables will vary. Maybe there are some wildcards for this type of cases?

_Go to "Provide Numbers Feedback" in the "Numbers" menu_, describe what you wish.
Then, cross your fingers, and wait _at least_ for iWork'09
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE mardi 12 août 2008 12:39:25)

12-Point Common Reference Postulate

I posted this in the pt v px v em topic, but I think it got
lost in the stream, but I’m interested in what others think
of this. If you saw it in the other topic and chose to ignore it,
you may, of course, ignore it again. If you have some real-world
insight, I’d love to hear it.
I don't quite get why points is considered evil. I understand
it's originally for print, but that shouldn't rule it out. Being an
absolute size: I don't get why that's summarily bad either.
Something like 12-point type is a nearly common reference. So
I propose for comment the:
12-POINT COMMON REFERENCE POSTULATE
Many people have their resolution set so they can read 12
point type--in word processors, etc. If you design a site with a
12-point base size with headlines larger from there, most can
already read it.
Those who can't read 12-point type with standard computer
settings
1) Have already set their OS options to display larger, so
12-point is already displaying big enough.
2) Have the option to set their browser to resize the type
larger.
Maybe the common reference is 12.5 or 13 points, but there's
still an approximate size that's perfectly sized for....let me pull
a figure out of the air....93.238% of the cases; and close enough
for...another intricate calculation...4.713% of the cases.
THE QUESTIONS
Is point size a theoretical evil or an actual evil?
Does it actually fail for a significant sampling of users?

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:09:23 +0000 (UTC), "DLoe"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Is point size a theoretical evil or an actual evil?
> Does it actually fail for a significant sampling of
users?
It's not evil, nor does it fail. It just renders
inconsistently between
browsers. Points are based on a conversion from inches.
Neither O/S, or
the browser know how to render something in inches, so the
size becomes
somewhat arbitrary.
Gary

Authorization check based on item category on sales order (VA01 or VA02)

I want to be able to restrict authorization of users based on item category. We only want certain users to be able to select a certain item category. I know I'm going to have to check one of the userexits in MV45AFZZ. The issue I'm having is the authorization object .
The item category is field VBAP-PSTYV.
What we are going is having a item category for emergency orders. But this requires more manual steps to associate with the original order. We already have the emergency item categories defined and working (no credit check etc) so there's no reason not to have them added to the original order. The issue is its use has to be restricted so when the user selects an alternative item category it checks whether they have the authority.
Any help would be appreciated

Hi,
You can achieve this through authorization objects.
Transaction
SU20 - Authorization Fields
SU21 - Authorization Objects
Create the field PSTYV in the Authorization Fields.
Then Create the authorization object and include this field along with the standard field ACTVT (which determines what activities can be performed by a certain user i.e. Create, Change or Display) & user-name
In your your-exit, you can either use the ABAP command AUTHORITY-CHECK or the function-module AUTHORITY_CHECK and pass the values for these fields. The system can perform the test based on this values & based on the sy-subrc value you can restrict the users that are not having the authorization to select item-categories for emergency orders.
Following link should help you:
[SAP Authorization Concept|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_wp/helpdata/en/52/671285439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm]
Hope that helps you.
Regards,
Saurabh

Approval procedure based on item category

Dear All,
I have a scenario where all my sales items will be categorized under two broad heads: Bulk & Non Bulk. So there will be a UDF where every item will be mapped to one of these values. I want to apply an approval procedure where I am able to raise an approval to different set of people for Bulk Items and different set of people in case of Non Bulk items. Kindly help me how I can do the same.
Regards
Kapil Kapoor

Hi,
It's not possible to create approval procedure based on item level. So if in a single document you have different types of (bulk/non-bulk) items you can't trigger different approval procedures.
In case you select the item type in a UDF in header level of a document, then it will be possible to send approval to different users based on the UDF value selected bulk/non-bulk.
Regards
Sibasish S.

Shipping point determination based on item category

Dear
we have a requirment which needs to determine shipping point based on item category. anyone could share how to achieve that? I am familiar with sap standard shipping determination rule: shipping condition in sold-to-party MMD or shipping condition within sale document type + loading group + delivery plant. However those condtions wouldnt fullfill our needs. the items within a sales order are exactly same except item category, such as item 10 is TAN , item 20 is TAB item.I want the system get different shipping point for those two different item category.
any though would be appreciated and thank you,
best regards
peng. tang

As already suggested, you can consider going with differentiating the Loading Group in material master, so that via standard configuration itself, you can achieve the desired result. On the other hand, if this is not possible, then, you can try with USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_LIPS in include MV50AFZ1
G. Lakshmipathi

Commision based on item group & customer group

Dear all,
Does anyone have an idea about how to get commission based on item group & customer group sales?
My customer wanted commission report based on item group or customer group & based on payment collection dated.
Example
Term given for customer A is 30 days.
12/3/09 Inv 1000   RM 10,000   30 days payment
20/4/09 Inv 2000 RM    5,000   60 days payment
The term given is 30 days of the invoice month.
Salesman will get commission if get the collection at May'09 for Inv 1000, & July'09 for iinv 2000 based on the invoice date month.
The salesman get commission at any date of the month May'09. More longer collection, less commission they will get.
Example:
Salesman A
Customer Group             1st of the month, 2nd of the month, 3rd of the month, 4th of the month
Normal Dealer                         1.5%         , 0.75%,              0.00%                   ,    -0.25%
Sub Distributor                       0.5%         , 0.25%,               0.00%                  ,    - 0.25%
Any idea?
Thanks in advance?
Regards,
Eric Tan

Hi Eric
SAP does not calculate commissions, but merely provide a mechanism to report on it. The multi level calculation you require can be achived with a custom query linked to a report layout. Standard SAP will not provide this type of calculation. You will need to look at the open transactions such as invoices and link to the relevant payment transaction to get the payment date. Then compare this date to the invoice due date to determine if the terms were adhered to or not. If not payment date - due date in number of days will be needed to calculate the effective commission percentage.
Kind regards
Peter Juby

FRM-40209 Field must be of form . - for a non-based text item

Hello,
When I try querying using a VARCHAR2 non-based text item in a table-based block, setting dynamically in PRE-QUERY trigger the DEFAULT_WHERE property for its block, in case I use characters > or < (for bringing values greater or smaller than the one in the field, as in a standard Oracle query) error message is raised: 'FRM-40209 Field must be of form .' The issue has nothing to do with the error itself (usually related to erronated format mask of the field), and it is known as an Oracle Forms bug: I found it as bug 851153 - which appears on execute query if you enter in a non-base-table-item and the block has a pre-query trigger. The bug has been solved later in Oracle Developer Forms Builder 6i, or so I've been reading, problem is the application I'm working to requires Forms Builder 6.0.5.
I am trying to find an workaround for this situation and these are the info I managed to discover myself on the topic:
- if I fill the field with '>value instead of >value, query works fine, bringing only values greater than the specified value. (So far, this and inactivating the FRM-40209 error in ON-ERROR trigger seems like the best I can do)
- if I only use > (without '), I cannot use an auxiliar variable/global in which to store the actual value written in the field, I also cannot print the value in a message, because trying to use the exact string, it is shown as null (even though when the error is raised, value is still shown on the screen in the text item).
Maybe someone could help with an idea for an workaround in order to copy the content of the text field before it actually becomes null…
Thank you in advance.

I have already tried that... but for some reasons the field already appears as null, when I try to use it.

We want to give promotional items based on item category irrelevant of UOM.

we want to give promotional items based on item category irrelevant of UOM.

998875 wrote:
we want to give promotional items based on item category irrelevant of UOM.And the relevance of this to this forum is...?

Price list based on item group

It would be great to have possibility to set up price lists with different factors based on item groups. Now it can be achieved by setting Period and Volume Discounts. But it doesn't allow to display correct price in Item Master Data or setup rounding.

Hi,
If I understand you correctly, here is the answer:
1. An option of create new price list based on Item Cost. YES
2. Have the ITEM COST as price list. (for AVG and STANDARD items valuation). Not sure what you exact mean. Probably not.
3. For items with valuation FIFO, can consider other price list only for this items, that include the information over FIFO layer. Probably not.
Thanks,
Gordon

Service Type A/R Credit Memo Based on Item Type A/R Invoice???

Hi Experts,
How can we Raise Service Type A/R Credit Memo for An A/R Invoice Which is Based on Item Type A/R Invoice???
We Need this Solution for A/R Invoice Which has been Claimed for Shortage but Actually No Return of Stock to us.
Regards,
M.Senthilnathan

Hi Senthil.....
On the basis of item type AR invoice its not possible to raise the service type AR credit memo.
But one thing you can do is yoou can raise the separate AR invoice and service credit memo. But later you need to
reconcile both the transactions manual. This way you can solve your purpose....
Regards,
Rahul

Volume Based Price Item CCM 2.0

Hi,
We are trying to upload items with the Volume Based Price Item. So we have/CCM/PRICE[2]#/CCM/AMOUNT, /CCM/PRICE[2]#/CCM/CURRENCY_CODE /CCM/PRICE
[2]#/CCM/LOWER_BOUND and so on. But when we buy a Volume Based Price Item the Price doesnt change according to the quantity.
We were wondering whether the problem is that we need an Aditional Optional Parameter in the Integrated Call Structure as we had done with the Minimum Order Quantity characteristic. Or we have to customize any
other parameter in order to get a different price depending on the quantity that we buy.
THANKS!!!!

Chris,
This morning I also posted another message asking help for Interval for Quantity issue.
When we upload items with the Interval for Quantity characteristic (/CCM/QUANTITY_INTERVAL).Then, when we use the Shopping Tool to buy them we can buy quantities that are not included in the interval. For example if we set 10 as the Quantity Interval and we try
to buy 15 units, we dont get any error.
Any idea? Could you tell us which OCI Field we have to assign to this characteristic. We were also wondering whether the problem is that we need an Aditional OCI (as we had done with the Minimum Order Quantity characteristic). Or whether we need to activate a BAdi.
THANKS in ADVANCED!!!! and THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR HELP WITH THE VOLUME BASED PRICE ITEMS!!!!

AP Tax based on Items

Can anyone provide a quick explanation of how I would be able to get taxation based on item for tax exempt, tax recoverable or taxable?
Is this best practice on determining a purchased item taxability?
Thank you in advance!

Better try to update in a positive manner as to whether the suggestions resolved your issue and if so, which one has helped you. This will help others who have similar requirement.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Need - Search page with LOV based flexfield item as search criteria

Our requirement is to make a flexfield item as search criteria.
Flexfield is having 2 segments Applicaiton and Responsibility, where 2nd segment *(Responsibility) is dependent on 1st (Application).*
Accordingly, an LOV must get displayed for each flex segment in the search panel.
We tried to create a page having this flex (DFF) item as a search criteria, but cannot proceed to get results in results region - we tried to use both properties in the query region - resultsbasedSearch and autocustomizationCriteria:
Any ideas how to make a search functionality having LOV based flexfield items in the search criteria?
Any other suggestions regarding the solution are welcome.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
May B.

Hi,
try a SQL query that uses bind variables as follows
... where column1 like '%:col1param%' and '%:column2%' like :col2param
Then in the implementation (session facade) check for null values and add '%' in case a value is null.
The query in EJB is defined in the entity
Frank

Common reference based on Item Combination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for