Communication channel issue

Dear All,
I am working on a file to rfc scenario, the scenario is working in development, but when the same code is moved to production it is not working.
I have provide the necessary details of the ftp server its credentials and the necessary SAP r/3 server connection details in the CC in prod after moving from dev.
Now the problem is that the communication channel which ever was moved along with the directory objects are not getting displayed in the cc monitoring, all other interfaces cc which was moved earlier is getting displayed.
And also we are not sure whether this CC is polling the ftp directory because of this.
PLease let me know how to view those CC in the RWB.
Regards,
Nithiyanandam
Regards,
Nithiyanandam

Hi All,
This scenario(File-RFC-File without BPM) is working fine with all the communication channels showing success message and also getting the response message from R/3 system to the FTP server.
But the problem is that the processing of message are not shown in SXMB_MONI.
Is there any specific parameter i need to maintain in SXMB_ADM other than
category: Monitor
Parameter:CCMS_MONITORING
Current value:1
default value:1
category: Runtime
parameter:IS_URL
currentvalue:http://xxxx:8003/sap/xi/engine?type=entry
category: Runtime
Parameter:LOGGING
Current value:1
default value:0
category: Runtime
Parameter:LOGGING_SYNC
Current value:1
default value:0
category: Runtime
Parameter:TRACE_LEVEL
Current value:3
default value:1
Is there any other parameter i need to specify, because for file to file scenarios it is working fine and displaying messages in SXMB_MONI.
Regards,
Nithiyanandam

Similar Messages

  • File communication channel issue : object name too long

    Hi Experts,
    My requirement is to place the successful files in folder and un-successful files in one folder after processing.
    we used parameterized mapping to achieve this requirement.
    I'm facing below issues, please help me to resolve.
    " An error occurred while connecting to the FTP server. The FTP server returned the following error message: 'com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx: 501 Unexpected reply codeSpecified object name too long, limit is 10 characters: $Filepath_Su.'. For details, contact your FTP server vendor.
    As per my understanding it is not taking the path specified,because of length issue.
    Please send me your valuable inputs and help me.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards
    Bhargava Krishna

    Hello,
    By loking ur error description, it's quite evident that it's a FTP sever issue?
    Sometime on FTP server, there is a check which is enabled to limit the length of file names, and i think the same has been recently implemented on ur FTP server. So instead of changing ur config, check with ur FTP admin.
    Tested the same after tweaking existing FTP server settings.
    Thanks
    Amit Srivastava

  • Issue with updation of communication  channel

    Hi Experts,
    I have configured a   JMS  to Proxy scenario in XI system. i  have changed  the  "Queue name" parameter   in  sender communication channel for the JMS adapter. the new Queue name is not  being used by the interface.
    when i monitor the messages  for the  this interface, i found that system is still using the Old  Queue name.
    can you please suggest  a way to resolve this issue.
    -Kaushik

    Hi,
    I am not sure if this resolves the issue.
    Stop the channel using RWB>Adapter Engine>Communication Channel Monitoring
    Identify your JMS sender Communication channel and stop it.
    Go to ID and reedit this channel and activate.
    Comeback to previous Communication Channel Monitoring check the status of activated Communication Channel (start it if it is still in stopped mode)
    - Gujjeti.

  • Issue on file sender adapter communication channel

    Hi All,
    I have an issue on some of the file sender adapter communication channels .The channels are failing with the error :
    (u201CAttempt to process file failed with com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.xi.swift.ParserException: com.sap.xi.swift.ParserException: Message does not start with character '0x1f'u201D).
    Please let me know the procedure to get this message processed.
    Thanks & Rgards
    Vishnu

    Hi Vishu,
    Find out in what encoding the file is in. for that download Notepad++ and open the file with in.
    In Encoding tab you will see the encoding format.
    1. If its not UTF-8 or ANSI then you should set the correct encoding in Sender File channel.
    2. Check for BOM characters which will not be visible directoly.
    3. Use Notepad++ to convert the content to HEX and check for hidden values. i bet there will be some Encoding BOM in the file which is creating problem while picking the file.
    Since you are using SWIFT module: try to validate the XML file using Altova XML and check weather is correct.
    also ref to this thread:http://scn.sap.com/thread/2134946
    Regards,
    Senthilprakash

  • Umlaut Conversion issue in Sender communication channel SAP PI

    Hi Gurus,
    We are facing issue while conversion.
    umlaut Conversion issue in Sender communication channel that is reason channel not able to pic the file from the path.
    Sender CC error:
    Value of incoming field is too large. Segment:'IMD', Field:'7008', MaxLength:'35', value:'Plssvvkbecher Lübzer 0,4 (1280Stk p' DESCRIPTION: The length of the field value is too big !
    Actually field contains 35 Chars only the value is  : 'Plssvvkbecher Lübzer 0,4 (1280Stk p'
    We tried with “ISO-8859-1” if the field value is less than 35 characters it is able to converting.
    Please help me out from this issue.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Jittu.

    Hi Jittu,
    Have you tried using the codepageconversion bean in the modules under the sender?  It would be like:
    AF_Modules/TextCodepageConversionBean with a parameter of Conversion.charset and a value of utf-8.
    Regards,
    Ryan Crosby

  • Issue creating Communication Channel

    Friends,
    I'm new to SAP XI and learning it but ran into below issue.
    When I try to create any communication channel in ID and click on "help" on Adapter Type field so it should display all the adapters in the system but it always shows "No objects founds!"
    Anyone please help me here?
    Note: I don't have SAP Service access so please don't point me to any SAP NOTE. (I appreciate).
    Thanks,
    Hetal

    Please refer to the installation document. Not sure which version you are installing but this is from XI3.0 installation document.
    Also check whether anything missing in config.
    Importing the XI Content for Software Component Version SAP Basis
    6.40 SR1
    1. Copy XI3_0_SAP_BASIS_6.40_09_00.tpz from <Components DVD>/XI
    /XI_CONTENT to directory
    /usr/sap/<SAPSID>/SYS/global/xi/repository_server/import/
    2. On your SAP XI host, call transaction SXMB_IFR.
    3. Choose Repository (Design).
    4. Choose . Tools . Import Design Objects
    Choose the file /usr/sap/<SAPSID>/SYS/global/xi/repository_server/import
    XI3_0_SAP_BASIS_6.40_09_00.tpz
    5. Import the file.
    -Pinkle

  • Communication channel availablity time issue

    Hi All,
    We want to schdule communication channel every  mid night ,but when i tried to give the time there is a diffrence of about 6 hours .so evry time if in need to schdule need to calculate and schdule the time ,checked out the server timing it is similar to system time ,even messages in MONI also showing the correct time ,do we need to check anything in the adpter engine to correct this time diffrence.
    Appreciate reply on this.
    Thanks,
    Madhu

    Madhu
    Iu2019m not sure if this is exactly your issue, but please see the following links concerning time issue in XI.
    Time setting is differnt in sxmb_moni and RWB
    Different time stamp in sxmb_moni and RWB
    Hope this helps.
    PJ

  • Issue in the XI Integration Directory when generating communication channel

    Hello,
    In the SAP XI Integration Directory, when I am attempting to create a Business System. I would like to have the communication channels automatically generated.   The Business System gets created as intended. However the communication channels are not automatically generated.  I get the message captured "<b>Unable to find an associated SLD element (source element: SAP_XIIntegrationDirectory, [CreationClassName, SAP_XIIntegrationDirectory, string, Name, directory.cxg.cpgia64, string], target element type: SAP_XIIntegrationServer)"</b>
      All configurations seems to be OK. Have you experienced this problem before, If so how did you remedy to it?
    Thanks in Advance,
    JLC

    Dear Cancel,
    we have this error too. What i can say is, that it have to
    do with the inconsistence of the SLD. You have to check if
    you don't have some inconsistence in the SLD.
    Sometime the connection to SLD is instable. Then just try
    again some minutes later. But it the error persist than
    something is not correct configured in SLD. We don't know
    exactly what we have done so that the error gone after
    correcting in SLD.
    best regard,
    Ly-Na Phu

  • Issue with content conversion in receuver communication channel

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure receiver communication channel with file adapter and content conversion.
    File structure is simple, as shown below:
    MT_EmployeeDetails
         Employee_rec
              Employee_rec_struct
                   EmpNo
                   EmpName
                   Address
    It should have generated file in the following format:
    1101     xxxx     xxxxx
    1102     xxxx     xxxxx
    1103     xxxx     xxxxx
    But it is generating flat file as shown below:
    1101     1102     1103     1104
    Basically it is populating only first field in the target field. But I could see that the xml file is properly getting
    generated in sxmb_moni.Also, when i tried to generate xml file without FCC, it is creating file properly.
    following are the parameters I am using:
    Employee_rec_struct.fielSeparator     '0x09'
    Employee_rec_struct.endSeparator     'nl'
    pls let me know whetehr i need to add any other parameters in FCC.

    Hi,
    Can u please provide with the exact structure of target... i know u have mentioned it already...
    But the hierarchy and occurence is nt clear..
    Like
    Mt
    ---Employee(1)
    Records(0..unbounded)
    Name(1)
    Age(1)
    So that others here,can easily get vt exactly u want and give the solution....
    If ur structure is like..
    MT_EmployeeDetails
    ---Employee_rec
    Employee_rec_struct(0..unbounded)
    EmpNo
    EmpName
    Address
    Then,
    Use,
    Employee_rec_struct.fieldSeparator '\t'
    end separator is optional... by default its new line characcter.. no need of giving....
    U should be giving the recordStructure as  Employee_rec_struct,*
    If still nt solved do post
    Babu

  • Issue with RWB Communication Channel Monitoring

    Hi All,
              I am getting a error in RWB >> Communication Channel Monitoring.
    I deactivated the receiver JDBC adapter, and now when I activate it, in the RWB it shows <i><b>'Channel started but Inactive'</b></i> I tried to start and stop the channel and also activating and deactivating the channel. But no success, it keeps showing <i><b>'Channel started but Inactive'</b></i>. Pls advice....
    XIer

    Hi XIer,
    Ideally adapter status should be in green when it is up and running..
    if it not then..
    1. check the status in ID. It should  be in active state.
    2. check the status in RWB .It should be in green. I not check that your adapter got activated without any  cache error.
    3. Do a CPA Cache Refresh.

  • Convrtd to Invterval Part- ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel

    Hi all,
    I had a table as Interval Partitioned. In order to create XML- Xpath indexes on it, I converted it to Range Partitioned table.
    I am able to create the XPATH indexes but I get the error: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    - When I revert the code to Interval Partitioned without the XMLIndex, it works fine(although takes time as no XML Index)
    - When I convert table to non partitioned table, create the XML Index, it works fine.
    But I need the partitons, so when I create the partitioned table I get the error.
    CREATE TABLE INT_PART_TABLE
    DB_ID VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
    xML_mESSAGE SYS.XMLTYPE,
    LOAD_TIMESTAMP TIMESTAMP(6)
    XMLTYPE xML_mESSAGE STORE AS BINARY XML
    PARTITION BY RANGE (LOAD_TIMESTAMP)
    PARTITION MAX VALUES LESS THAN (TIMESTAMP' 2013-06-01 00:00:00')
    TABLESPACE CSTR_STG_DATA
    NOCOMPRESS
    NOCACHE
    ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
    BEGIN
    DBMS_XMLINDEX.dropparameter('Indx_Par');
    END;
    BEGIN
    DBMS_XMLINDEX.REGISTERPARAMETER(
    'Indx_Par',
    'PATH TABLE Table1
    PATHS (INCLUDE ( /abc:field1/xyz:field2
    /abc:field1/def:field2
    NAMESPACE MAPPING ( xmlns:abc="ABCD"
    xmlns:def="DEFG"
    xmlns:xyz="XYZA"
    end;
    create index INDX_XPATHS on "INT_PART_TABLE" (XML_MESSAGE) indextype is xdb.xmlindex
    parameters ('PARAM Indx_Par') local;
    Now if I execute the following statement in
    SELECT T.xML_mESSAGE
    FROM INT_PART_TABLE1 T
    WHERE XMLEXISTS (
    declare namespace abc="ABCD";
    declare namespacedef="DEFG";
    declare namespace xyz="XYZA";
    let $tt as xs:boolean := fn:exists($p/main/id = ("144283","9085802")])
    return if ($tt) then true()
    else ()'
    PASSING T.xML_mESSAGE AS "p");
    - Is there any other way of writing this Select statement, which may work?
    - Any other thing I need to take care of when defining the table and partitions script so that I don't get this error?

    Hi,
    I think it's time you give a clear (and working) test case so that we can safely try to reproduce the issue.
    What you've given so far has syntax error and name mismatch.
    So please :
    - database version (SELECT * FROM v$version)
    - complete sequence of DLLs
    - some sample XML documents (it doesn't have to be the real ones, but at least something realistic)
    Thanks in advance.
    declare namespace abc="ABCD";
    declare namespacedef="DEFG";
    declare namespace xyz="XYZA";
    let $tt as xs:boolean := fn:exists($p/main/id = ("144283","9085802")])
    return if ($tt) then true()
    else ()'Why all that stuff? You don't have to return a boolean.
    The following works for me on 11.2.0.3 :
    SQL> CREATE TABLE int_part_table (
      2    db_id          VARCHAR2(10)
      3  , xml_message    XMLTYPE
      4  , load_timestamp TIMESTAMP
      5  )
      6  XMLTYPE xml_message STORE AS BINARY XML
      7  PARTITION BY RANGE (load_timestamp) (
      8    PARTITION MAX VALUES LESS THAN (timestamp '2013-06-01 00:00:00')
      9  )
    10  NOCOMPRESS
    11  NOCACHE
    12  ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
    Table created
    SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>144283</id></main>'), sysdate);
    1 row inserted
    SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>9085802</id></main>'), sysdate);
    1 row inserted
    SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>1</id></main>'), sysdate);
    1 row inserted
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete
    SQL> create index int_part_table_uix on int_part_table (xml_message)
      2  indextype is xdb.xmlindex
      3  parameters (
      4  'PATH TABLE INT_PART_TABLE_PT
      5  PATHS ( INCLUDE ( /main/id ) )')
      6  local;
    Index created
    SQL> SELECT xml_message
      2  FROM int_part_table
      3  WHERE XMLExists(
      4         '/main[id=("144283","9085802")]'
      5         PASSING xml_message
      6       )
      7  ;
    XML_MESSAGE
    <main>
      <id>144283</id>
    </main>
    <main>
      <id>9085802</id>
    </main>
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3517234298
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                              |     1 |   155 |    34   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   1 |  NESTED LOOPS                          |                              |     1 |   155 |    34   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   2 |   VIEW                                 | VW_SQ_1                      |     1 |    25 |    32   (4)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   3 |    HASH UNIQUE                         |                              |     1 |    47 |         |             |       |       |
    |*  4 |     HASH JOIN SEMI                     |                              |     1 |    47 |    32   (4)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   5 |      PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     2 |    90 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |*  6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     2 |    90 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |*  7 |        INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |   8 |      COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH | XQSEQUENCEFROMXMLTYPE        |  8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |*  9 |   TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID           | INT_PART_TABLE               |     1 |   130 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       4 - access("SYS_P3"."VALUE"=SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(VALUE(KOKBF$),2,1,0) AND
                  SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)=SUBSTRB(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(VALUE(KOKBF$),2,1,0),1,1599))
       6 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
       7 - access("SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
           filter("SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       9 - filter("ITEM_6"=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"INT_PART_TABLE".ROWID))
    Note
       - Unoptimized XML construct detected (enable XMLOptimizationCheck for more information)
    SQL> SELECT xml_message
      2  FROM int_part_table
      3  WHERE XMLExists(
      4         '/main[id="144283" or id="9085802"]'
      5         PASSING xml_message
      6       )
      7  ;
    XML_MESSAGE
    <main>
      <id>144283</id>
    </main>
    <main>
      <id>9085802</id>
    </main>
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3748936130
    | Id  | Operation                                | Name                         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                         |                              |     1 |   155 |    11  (10)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   1 |  NESTED LOOPS                            |                              |     1 |   155 |    11  (10)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   2 |   VIEW                                   | VW_SQ_1                      |     2 |    50 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   3 |    HASH UNIQUE                           |                              |     2 |   180 |         |             |       |       |
    |   4 |     CONCATENATION                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     1 |    90 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   7 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |*  8 |         TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |*  9 |          INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |  10 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 11 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 12 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID  | INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |  13 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
    |  14 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     1 |    90 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |  15 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 16 |         TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 17 |          INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |  18 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 19 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 20 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID  | INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |* 21 |   TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID             | INT_PART_TABLE               |     1 |   130 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       8 - filter("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='9085802' AND SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1 AND SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='9085802')
       9 - access("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
           filter("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
      11 - access("SYS_P5"."RID"="SYS_P3"."RID" AND "SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('0BBD')  AND
                  "SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"<"SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY")
           filter(SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY")+1=SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY") AND
                  TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"SYS_P3"."RID")=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE_PT",0,7,65535,ROWI
                  D) AND "SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY"<SYS_ORDERKEY_MAXCHILD("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"))
      12 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
      16 - filter("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='144283' AND SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1 AND SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='144283' AND
                  (LNNVL("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='9085802') OR LNNVL("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') ) OR
                  LNNVL(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1) OR LNNVL(SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='9085802')))
      17 - access("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
           filter("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
      19 - access("SYS_P5"."RID"="SYS_P3"."RID" AND "SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('0BBD')  AND
                  "SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"<"SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY")
           filter(SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY")+1=SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY") AND
                  TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"SYS_P3"."RID")=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE_PT",0,7,65535,ROWI
                  D) AND "SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY"<SYS_ORDERKEY_MAXCHILD("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"))
      20 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
      21 - filter("ITEM_2"=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"INT_PART_TABLE".ROWID))I asked in one of your other threads if /main/id was unique per XML document.
    If so, you can use a simple function-based index instead of the XMLIndex :
    SQL> drop index int_part_table_uix;
    Index dropped.
    SQL> create index int_part_table_ix1 on int_part_table (
      2    xmlcast(
      3      xmlquery('/main/id' passing XML_MESSAGE returning content)
      4      as varchar2(10)
      5    )
      6  );
    Index created.
    SQL> SELECT xml_message
      2  FROM int_part_table
      3  WHERE XMLCast(
      4          XMLQuery('/main/id' PASSING xml_message RETURNING CONTENT)
      5          AS VARCHAR2(10)
      6        )
      7  IN ('144283', '9085802');
    XML_MESSAGE
    <main>
      <id>144283</id>
    </main>
    <main>
      <id>9085802</id>
    </main>
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 2864653096
    | Id  | Operation                           | Name               | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time  | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                    |                    |     2 |   236 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   1 |  INLIST ITERATOR                    |                    |       |       |            |       |  |       |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE     |     2 |   236 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
    |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | INT_PART_TABLE_IX1 |     2 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - access(CAST(EXTRACTVALUE(SYS_MAKEXML(0,"SYS_NC00003$"),'/main/id',null,0,0,524293,1073874944) AS
                  varchar2(10)   )='144283' OR CAST(EXTRACTVALUE(SYS_MAKEXML(0,"SYS_NC00003$"),'/main/id',null,0,0,524293,1073874944
                  ) AS varchar2(10)   )='9085802')

  • One communication channel with 2 cluster node functioning at the same time

    Hi Gurus,
    We have PI 7.1 installed in a HA environment, which includes  two servers.
    server A: ASCSSCSDBERSAAS
    server B: ERS + PAS
    and we can see a jdbc channel in the communication channel monitoring, and along with the CC there are two cluster ID available,both of which are showing green -- functioning.
    now the issue is the process is actually not started because there is no processing details, and  when we stop the CC and then start, nothing happens, but there are still 2 green nights, seems very strange.
    does any one have such experience and how can make these two nodes work well?
    Thanks.

    Probably they use an older version of alsa that doesn't have dmix enabled by default.
    Have a read through: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ALSA_Compl … ix%29#dmix
    Perhaps it will help.

  • One Communication Channel for two XML-Structure

    Hi to all!
    i'm Newbee in XI.
    i register one Communication Channel to recieve two different XML-Structure and when i sent second structure there was a Mapping error, because XI waiting for first XML-Structure.
    I'd like to ask if there are any additional condition that i must tune up to make it possible or just it's impossible?

    Hi,
    Please refer below links
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/121b053d-0401-0010-539f-f9295efb7bad
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3a913f71-0601-0010-7a83-dfd3208a9a0b
    how to find the URL of deployed Web services?
    Creating .NET Web service
    http://www.15seconds.com/issue/010430.htm
    Also refer SOAP Framework to generate the common wsdl for both the messages with single SOAP CC
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/bb/ddb33d2ae46b3be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Thanks
    swarup

  • Different message structures on one communication channel

    Hello,
    we've got the situation where on on single communication channel, we will have multiple message structures. We need to discriminate between them and then handle them according to their structure.
    All messages have a header section in which the message type is stored. So I've created a dummy structure:
    <ns0:dummy>
      <header>
        <message_type></message_type>
      </header>
    </ns0:dummy>
    the actual messges will have a different root element, but you can ignore this by using xpath. So, I've created a sender agremeent with this dummy message as the interface. I have a interface determination with conditions:
    /*/header/message_type = MT_A
    and receiving interface MT_A. Same for MT_B and so forth. There's no interface mapping in between.
    The receiving system now has a receiver agreement with MT_A as the interface. This all works. But in the receiver agreement you set up a communication channel where the message is sent to.
    But at this point, MT_A was what the original system sended. All we did was figuring out what message type we're dealing with. Now we need to handle this message as MT_A and using a interface mapping, map it to MT_A_New. We cannot do this in the original receiver determination / interface determination combi, sinse this would mean a message mapping from dummy to something, and we need from MT_A -> MT_A_NEW.
    Does anyone have thoughts on how to do this?
    Thanx in advance!
    Greetings, Walter.

    Hello All,
    thanks for all your input, it gave me quite a few possible directions to look.
    we eventually solved our issue by creating a "generic" structure. It contains the header part (which is the same in structure A and B) and both the A body and B body as optional parts.
    now we can make a mapping which only operates on the A part and ignores the B part and also one which does the B part.
    <root>
      <header>
        <MT></MT>
      </header>
      <MT_A>
      </MT_A>
      <MT_B>
       </MT_B>
    </root>
    we can still define which mapping to use based on the header information. It all seems to work.
    Thanks again for all your input!
    Greetings, Walter.

  • Communication channel - Variable Substitution error,.

    Hi,
    I am having the following mesage type used in messag emapping as a target structure
    mt_data
       -> Variable1
    I am having a validation on mt_data node in message mapping for generating it, if condition is satisfied mt_data will be generetaed. Under mt_data i am having a variable. This variable is getting populated with some data using normal source to target mapping.
    I am using this variable in my communication channel as a variable substitution, and is used to replace file name.
    The issue I am facing is, when the mt_data fails to get generated (valid reason, since validation to generate it failed), communciation channel in RWB fails saying variable for substitution not found.
    Kindly advice.
    Thanks,
    Mudita

    The issue I am facing is, when the mt_data fails to get generated (valid reason, since validation to generate it failed), communciation channel in RWB fails saying variable for substitution not found.
    1) make a check on the variable in receiver determination itself...so that if fails then the message stops in Receiver determination itself....why to take it forward till channel and then fail.
    2) Make use of some constant term to fill the variable in the mapping if the validation fails.....this will help to put value in the variable even when the validation fails and the message does not fail in channel...filename created.
    You need to check with the functional people on how they want the message prcessing to occur when the variable cannot be created by the mapping logic.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

Maybe you are looking for