Compare two year column

Hi to all,
I'm new at Crystal and I have a question.
I have a source table that have the following layout:
NAME       DATE      SALES_VALUE
aaaaa      Jan09           1000
bbbbb      Feb09           1111
ccccc      Mar09           1010
aaaaa      Jan10            1200
I want to create a report that compares the same month on diferent years like the following:
NAME       JAN09      JAN10
Of course, the month is not fixed, but it will be a parameter defined by the user...
Can anyone help me?
Thanks,
Luis

You could create a formula, and group off of it.
day()&" "& month()
If you go to details section and check Format with Multiple Columns
you will see a layout tab pop up.
click on it, select the proper width
and across then down
then you will get your two columns.
Something like this
NAME     DATE     SALES_VALUE                 NAME     DATE     SALES_VALUE
aaaaa     01/01/2010      1,000.00                           aaaaa           01/01/2011      1,507.50
aaaaa     02/01/2010      1,952.50                          aaaaa     02/01/2011      2,397.50
bbbbb     01/10/2010      1,240.50                           ccccc     01/10/2011      1,908.00
bbbbb     02/10/2010      2,353.00            ccccc     02/10/2011      2,798.00

Similar Messages

Compare two table columns

hi all,
i am using db10g.
my task is to compare two table's data for example
table1 is having
col1 col2 col3
a b c
e f g
table2 is
col4 col5 col6
a e c
e f g
so i have to compare col1 first record and col4 first record.
in otherwords first table first column first item with second table first table first value and so on.
for ex: a= a
b= e
c= c etc
how can i acheive this?
both are database tables.
i cannot use minus function because data types are different for the corresponding column
how can i compare it?
Thanks..
Edited by: user13329002 on Jan 13, 2011 1:09 AM

Hi,
Try this
select
    case
        when a.col1 = b.col1 then 'EQUAL' else 'NOT EQUAL' end column1,
    case
        when a.col2 = b.col2 then 'EQUAL' else 'NOT EQUAL' end column2,
    case
        when a.col3 = b.col3 then 'EQUAL' else 'NOT EQUAL' end column3
from (select col1,col2,col3,rownum rn from table1) a,
                            (select col1,col2,col3,rownum rn from table2) b where a.rn = b.rn Try to see how you order the rows of the two tables.
cheers
VT

Is there an easy way to compare two null columns?

I need to compare a significant number of columns between records in two tables for a data conversion. I really need a comparison that will return true if: 1) both columns are null; or 2) both columns are not null and equal. I want it to return false if: 3) one column is null and the other is not; or 4) both columns are not null and are not equal. I am trying to find records which are not exact matches.
I found documentation at oracle-base.com about the SYS_OP_MAP_NONNULL function that would do what I want, but I don't want to use this since it's an undocumented feature and my code will be in production for a period of time.
I would rather not have to use a construct like this for each and every column I'm comparing:
          a.col is null
          and b.col is null
     or (
          a.col = b.col
)Also, I know about the NVL function, but I'm comparing columns which are entered by users, and I'm not comfortable substituting any values for null because those values might actually exist in the data.

Performance wasn't the issue but they will be about the same anyway. The issue was avoiding the messy syntax needed to do the job.
Which of these looks easier to you if you had to understand and maintain the code or add new columns
>
I would rather not have to use a construct like this for each and every column I'm comparing:
          a.col is null
          and b.col is null
     or (
          a.col = b.col
>
or
1 = DECODE (a.col, b.col, 1)So if, like the OP, you had to 'compare a significant number of columns' which syntax would you use?

Compare two records column by column in same table

Hi All,
I have an address table with ID as the PK but there can be more than one ID. I need to take the latest address record and first see if that same ID has a previous address record and if so, compare each column to see if the data has changed. I only need to compare the latest record with the next latest record.
I cannot figure this out at all. I can of course use the MAX function to get the latest address records but do not know how I can pull the next latest address record that matches the ID and compare each column.
Sample table:
ID street city state zip effective_date
1 123 main chicago IL 60111 3-7-2012
2 34 N 13th new york NY 18374 3-7-2012
3 15 N main Dallas TX 47389 3-7-2012
1 89 N main chicago IL 60111 1-5-2012
1 16 East St columbus OH 47382 12-10-2011
2 34 N 13th new york NY 18374 10-7-2011
2 15 S Elm new york NY 18374 09-1-2011
3 15 N main Dallas TX 47389 10-4-2011
SO...in the table above using today as the latest record date, based of my criteria I would only want to pull record ID 1 and 2 since the next most recent record for those IDs have had at least one of their address data change. ID 3 has exactly the same address data so I would not consider that in my criteria.
Can i do this with SQL only or will i need to create a procedure or function?
Any help is appreciated
Ben

Ben C wrote:
Hi All,
I have an address table with ID as the PK but there can be more than one ID. You mean there can be more than one row with tha same ID, right? (There can be more than one ID, also.)
I need to take the latest address record and first see if that same ID has a previous address record and if so, compare each column to see if the data has changed. I only need to compare the latest record with the next latest record.
... Sample table:Whenever you have a problem, please post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data, and the exact results you want from that data.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using.
Can i do this with SQL only or will i need to create a procedure or function?You don't need PL/SQL, if I understand your requirements. You can do something like this:
WITH     got_analytics     AS
     SELECT     id, street, city, state, zip, effective_date
     ,     COUNT (*)     OVER ( PARTITION BY id )          AS cnt
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY id
                               ORDER BY         effective_date     DESC
                       )                           AS r_num
     FROM    table_x
--     WHERE     ...     -- If you need any filtering, put it here
SELECT    id, street, city, state, zip, effective_date
FROM       got_analytics
WHERE       cnt     > 1
AND       r_num     <= 2
ORDER BY id
,            effective_date
;This will show the most recent 2 rows for each id that has 2 (or more) rows.
You can modify it to only include ids where there was some change in street, city, state or zip between those 2 rows.
WITH     got_analytics     AS
     SELECT     id, street, city, state, zip, effective_date
     ,     COUNT (*)     OVER ( PARTITION BY id )          AS cnt
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY id
                               ORDER BY         effective_date     DESC
                       )                           AS r_num
     FROM    table_x
--     WHERE     ...     -- If you need any filtering, put it here
,     got_unique_cnts     AS
     SELECT     id, street, city, state, zip, effective_date
     ,     COUNT (DISTINCT '~' || street) OVER (PARTITION BY id)     AS street_cnt
     ,     COUNT (DISTINCT '~' || city)   OVER (PARTITION BY id)     AS city_cnt
     ,     COUNT (DISTINCT '~' || state) OVER (PARTITION BY id)     AS state_cnt
     ,     COUNT (DISTINCT '~' || zip)    OVER (PARTITION BY id)     AS zip_cnt
     FROM       got_analytics
     WHERE       cnt     > 1
     AND       r_num     <= 2
SELECT    id, street, city, state, zip, effective_date
FROM       got_unique_cnts
WHERE       street_cnt     > 1
OR       city_cnt     > 1
OR       state_cnt     > 1
OR       zip_cnt     > 1
ORDER BY id
,            effective_date
;This assumes that street, city, state and zip are all VARCHAR2s. If any of those columns is NULL on one row, and not NULL on the other row for that ID, that counts as a difference.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Mar 7, 2012 3:37 PM
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Mar 7, 2012 3:41 PM

Comparing two report columns in webi

Hi ,
I have as cenario where we need to get unmatched records of 2 reports .
Ex:
Rept1
Name    no               rev
A        12323           100
B         23431           150
C         45631            200
Rept2
date        No     sales
1/3/15 123-23       300
3/2/15   234-31      400
4/3/15    356-31     300
final o/p : i need to compare rep1 no with rept 2 no and finally i need to dissplay unmatched records of Rept1 with Rept2.
here in above rept 1 & rept2 unmatched record is 45631 .
Thanks.

then on report level you have to fetch both the report data in different queries
let say query1 contains data for report1
like wise for query2
now,
on report level create an object
New_No =toNumber(Replace(query2.No;"-";""))
Now merge No from query1 & New_No .
Create a formula =[No] Where (isNull(query2.sales) = 1 ), here [No] should be merged dimension.
this will get you result

Sql table function that compares two tables column structure and returns each difference as a record in the returned table

hi,
Does anyone have or can show me the principle of a such kind of function ?

see
http://geekswithblogs.net/leonardm/archive/2010/01/14/table-schema-comparison-in-sql-server.aspx
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My Wiki User Page
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

How to compare two different characteristics at the same time in polestar

Hi Gurus,
I would like to analyse the e fashion universe in polestar with comparison of previous year product line with current year product line at the same time.
is there any way to do that we can compare two years of the product line sales revenue at the same time with comparison chart like 2003 T shirts vs 2002 T shirts
in polestar we can compare the two measures at the same time but i want to compare the sales revenue of product lines of two years in a comparison chart at the same time.
Regards and thanks
Abid Paul

Hi Stratos,
I am actually able to compare the Measures but i want the comparison between the two different characteristics like this year productline vs last year productline at the same time with say one measure like sales revenue or any other.
Is it possible to compare the both and it should represent in the chart as well at the same time.
In the polestar i can compare three measures at the same time but i want to compare characteristics like year 2009 productline VS 2008 productline with one measure say sales revenue.
I would really appreciate if you could help me out.
Regards and thanks
Abid

Compare two columns and match ALL recurring values, not just the first instance

Hi everybody...
I was looking for a way to compare values in two columns, identifying every duplicate value instance on a third column.
Searching around the forums, I found a solution, albeit a partial one; I am using this formula: =IFERROR("Duplicate in row "&MATCH($A,$B,0),"") along column C, to compare values between columns A and B. When applied, the formula will render the first instance where there is a duplicate; unfortunately MATCH will only register the first instance of the duplicated values.
For example:
The first value on column A is 'Apple'. On column B there are three instances for the value 'Apple', the formula identifies the first of these values, but not the remaining two.
I am not an advanced Numbers or Excel user, and the answer to this problem eludes me. I am attempting to compare columns that have no less than 1000 rows each, so you can imagine how, finding a solution to my problem would be really great.
Thanks in advance,
Pablo

Unfortunately I can't see your screenshot, but supposing you have a table like this:
Col1
Col2
1
3
Dupe
2
4
Dupe
3
5
Dupe
4
6
5
7
Then here is one way to flag the duplicates.
The formula in C2, copied down, is:
=IF(COUNTIF($A,$B2)≥1,"Dupe","")
Then filter on column C for 'Dupe', and copy the values in column B to wherever you need them.
SG

Compare two columns and formate based on condition

I know this dead horse has been beaten and I've read my fair share of threads and manuals to no avail.. I have two list that consist of movie titles, holiday movies to be exact. I'm creating a holiday movie schedule which consist of three(3) columns...A,B and C. Column A is the Date, Sat, November 17 2012 thru Monday, Dec 24, 2012. Column C consist of a movie list divided into 2 sections with three subsections each. Section 1 is animated movies and Section 2 is live action, each subsection, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 are lists based on popularity with the kids...low, medium and high respectively. And finally column B is the movie list relative the column A...the schedule.
As I write a movie title in column B, I'd like the cell fill to be light red and the corresponding title in column C change to strike through font type. This way I know I've added the movie title to the schedule...this comes in handy when I ask the kids to help so we have no duplicates in the schedule. I'm assuming this would take a combination of; Conditional Formatting, cell formulas and perhaps an additional blank column for trigger results.
I'm including the table, which include an experimental column I was working on. As an FYI, this has been completed in Excel already, just hoping to get it done in Numbers.
Thanks for any help anyone can give.
Date
Movie Name
Class
Sat, Nov 17, 2012
Animated Christmas Movies
TRUE
Lowest Priority Animation
TRUE
Frosty Returns
TRUE
Sun, Nov 18, 2012
The Nightmare Before Christmas
Rudolph and Frosty's Christmas in July
TRUE
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer & the Island of Misfit Toys
TRUE
Rudolph's Shiny New Year
TRUE
Mon, Nov 19, 2012
Nothing Like the Holidays
TRUE
Medium Priority Animation
TRUE
Jack Frost Animation
TRUE
Tue, Nov 20, 2012
Home for the Holidays
It's Christmas Time Again, Charlie Brown
TRUE
Christmas in South Park
TRUE
Cartoon Network Christmas Rocks
TRUE
Wed, Nov 21, 2012
Planes, Trains and Automobiles
Cartoon Network Christmas Yuletide Follies
TRUE
Cartoon Network Christmas Vol3
TRUE
Twas the Night Before Christmas
TRUE
Thu, Nov 22, 2012
Planes, Trains and Automobiles
The Little Drummer Boy
TRUE
TRUE
Highest Priority Animation
TRUE
Fri, Nov 23, 2012
Trapped in Paradise
The Simpson's Christmas
TRUE
A Very Special Family Guy Freakin' Christmas
TRUE
Family Guy: Road To The North Pole
TRUE
Sat, Nov 24, 2012
American Dad! The Most Adequate Christmas Ever
TRUE
A Charlie Brown Christmas
TRUE
The Nightmare Before Christmas
FALSE
Sun, Nov 25, 2012
Die Hard
Frosty the Snowman
Die Hard 2
Hooves of Fire
How the Grinch Stole Christmas
Mon, Nov 26, 2012
Gremlins
Santa Claus is Comin' to Town
The Year Without a Santa Claus
Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer
Tue, Nov 27, 2012
The Ice Harvest
Live Action Christmas Movies
Lowest Priority
Wed, Nov 28, 2012
Reindeer Games
National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation 2: Cousin Eddie's Island Adventure
Chasing Christmas
The Nativity Story
Thu, Nov 29, 2012
Bad Santa
Unaccompanied Minors
Jingle All the Way
Jack Frost Live
Fri, Nov 30, 2012
The Shop Around the Corner
The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause
The Santa Clause 2: The Mrs. Clause
Sat, Dec 1, 2012
The Bishop's Wife
Medium Priority
0
Bad Santa
Bad Santa
Mixed Nuts
Mixed Nuts
Sun, Dec 2, 2012
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Reindeer Games
Reindeer Games
The Ice Harvest
The Ice Harvest
The Shop Around the Corner
The Shop Around the Corner
Mon, Dec 3, 2012
Miracle on 34th Street B&W
The Bishop's Wife
The Bishop's Wife
Christmas in Connecticut
Christmas in Connecticut
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Tue, Dec 4, 2012
Mixed Nuts
Nothing Like the Holidays
Nothing Like the Holidays
Home for the Holidays
Home for the Holidays
The Family Man
The Family Man
Wed, Dec 5, 2012
Scrooged
Miracle on 34th Street 1994
Miracle on 34th Street 1994
Miracle on 34th Street B&W
Miracle on 34th Street B&W
Just Friends
Just Friends
Thu, Dec 6, 2012
Just Friends
Trapped in Paradise
Trapped in Paradise
0
Highest Priority
0
Fri, Dec 7, 2012
Miracle on 34th Street 1994
Die Hard
Die Hard
Die Hard 2
Die Hard 2
Gremlins
Gremlins
Sat, Dec 8, 2012

Hi Stephen,
Both of these are solvable, and the Date solution cold be similar to that used for the 'stock list' in column C. The Movie Title solution is a different case, though.
The stock list is edited only occasionally, so requiring the user to unhide column C, add a title, then rehide the column is workable.
The same is true of the date list, so this too would work with the dates entered into a column that will be hidden, then copied into a visible column with a formula that introduced a detectable difference into the copied version, dependent on the weekday of each date. That difference would be used to trigger the conditional formatting of the cell containing the calculated date as text value. See the example below.
But the (scheduled) Movie Title column doesn't fit nicely into that mode of operation, as it is edited quite often. As editing, usng the model described, requires making the data column visible, editing the entry (or entries) in that column, then rehiding the column, the hassle factor soon becomes insufferable, if nothing else.
The first solution I considered (see earlier reply) is workable only if the the formatted table starts and remains the same size in all details (ie. individual row height) as the main table.Any change in row height in the main table not reflected in the auxiliary table immediately destroys the impression of formatting applying to the correct cells. With cells set to wrap text and varying lengths of movie titles, wrapped lines changing the height of individual rows is pretty much unavoidable.
Best practice here would seem to be to use a separate column to flag the titles already in the "Class" list with a "√" (or flag those not in the list with an "X"), and use conditional formatting to change the background colour of the flagging cell.
Here's a sample, using "W" to flag the weekend dates in the new column B, and "√" to flag the titles that are on the list already in the new column D.
I've added two titles to the weekend date, November 18. One is non-existent (as far as I know), so it doesn't appear in the list and doesn't get flagged; the other is chosen from a visible part of the list to show the highlighting of the title in that list. Column "C" (now column "F" due to the insertion of two new columns) is hidden. G, labelled .Class, is the calculated column (D) from the previous message.
Regards,
Barry

Create ViewCriteria comparing two columns from same table

Does anyone know how I can create a ViewCriteria where clause that compares two columns from the same table?
For example if I had two integer columns (MINSAL and MAXSAL) and wanted to see if they are equal. I would normally do the following SQL below.
SELECT * FROM EMPL
WHERE MINSAL = MAXSAL

It works, but it is not ideal.
Setup a Transient column that performs a groovy evaluation of MINSAL=MAXSAL and then my ViewCriteria evaluates the column to true and I set Query Execution Mode to Both.

How to compare two dates that should not exceed morethan 3 years

hi all,
can you please tell me how to compare two dates( basically dates are string type)
that should not exceed more than 3 years? in JAVASCRIPT
Thanks in Advance.

This is not a JavaScript forum.
[*Google* JavaScript Forum|http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=JavaScript+Forum&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a]
Good luck.

How can i compare two XML files storeds in a LONG column

Hi,
I need to compare two xml files. My xmls are stored in two table like this:
Table 1
ID_COL number(5);
XML1 LONG()
Table 2
ID_COL number(5);
XML2 LONG()
I need compare the values of the tags of this xmls files e to list de differences.
Tks,
Fernando.

yes odie you are right...i think that my xml is wrong...
I would like to compare every element/attribute...
Bellow is another xml...this is ok....tks
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <nfeProc xmlns="http://www.portalfiscal.inf.br/nfe" versao="2.00">
- <NFe xmlns="http://www.portalfiscal.inf.br/nfe">
- <infNFe Id="NFe31121059106377000172550010003957681605366269" versao="2.00">
+ <ide>
<cUF>31</cUF>
<cNF>60536626</cNF>
<natOp>VDAS PROD ESTABELECIMENT</natOp>
<indPag>1</indPag>
<mod>55</mod>
<serie>1</serie>
<nNF>395768</nNF>
<dEmi>2012-10-03</dEmi>
<dSaiEnt>2012-10-03</dSaiEnt>
<hSaiEnt>18:30:00</hSaiEnt>
<tpNF>1</tpNF>
<cMunFG>3159605</cMunFG>
<tpImp>1</tpImp>
<tpEmis>1</tpEmis>
<cDV>9</cDV>
<tpAmb>1</tpAmb>
<finNFe>1</finNFe>
<procEmi>0</procEmi>
<verProc>1.0</verProc>
</ide>
+ <emit>
<CNPJ>59106377000172</CNPJ>
<xNome>METAGAL IND E COM LTDA</xNome>
<xFant>METAGAL INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA</xFant>
- <enderEmit>
<xLgr>ROD BR 459</xLgr>
<nro>333</nro>
<xCpl>KM 121</xCpl>
<xBairro>DISTRITO INDUSTRIAL</xBairro>
<cMun>3159605</cMun>
<xMun>SANTA RITA DO SAPUCAI</xMun>
<UF>MG</UF>
<CEP>37540000</CEP>
<cPais>1058</cPais>
<xPais>BRASIL</xPais>
<fone>3534719100</fone>
</enderEmit>
<IE>5969141300009</IE>
<IM>01183</IM>
<CNAE>2949299</CNAE>
<CRT>3</CRT>
</emit>
+ <dest>
<CNPJ>59275792000150</CNPJ>
<xNome>GENERAL MOTORS DO BRASIL LTDA</xNome>
- <enderDest>
<xLgr>AV GOIAS</xLgr>
<nro>1805</nro>
<xBairro>BARCELONA</xBairro>
<cMun>3548807</cMun>
<xMun>SAO CAETANO DO SUL</xMun>
<UF>SP</UF>
<CEP>09501970</CEP>
<cPais>1058</cPais>
<xPais>BRASIL</xPais>
</enderDest>
<IE>636003724112</IE>
<email>[email protected]</email>
</dest>
- <det nItem="1">
+ <prod>
<cProd>XM20C9500PPR</cProd>
<cEAN />
<xProd>ESPELHO RETROVISOR EXTERNO</xProd>
<NCM>70091000</NCM>
<CFOP>6501</CFOP>
<uCom>PC</uCom>
<qCom>80.0000</qCom>
<vUnCom>35.8700000000</vUnCom>
<vProd>2869.60</vProd>
<cEANTrib />
<uTrib>PC</uTrib>
<qTrib>80.0000</qTrib>
<vUnTrib>35.8700000000</vUnTrib>
<indTot>1</indTot>
<xPed>XRW001RV</xPed>
<nItemPed>000001</nItemPed>
</prod>
- <imposto>
- <ICMS>
- <ICMS00>
<orig>0</orig>
<CST>00</CST>
<modBC>3</modBC>
<vBC>2869.60</vBC>
<pICMS>12.00</pICMS>
<vICMS>344.35</vICMS>
</ICMS00>
</ICMS>
- <IPI>
<CNPJProd>00000000000000</CNPJProd>
<cEnq>0</cEnq>
- <IPINT>
<CST>54</CST>
</IPINT>
</IPI>
- <II>
<vBC>0.00</vBC>
<vDespAdu>0.00</vDespAdu>
<vII>0.00</vII>
<vIOF>0.00</vIOF>
</II>
- <PIS>
- <PISNT>
<CST>08</CST>
</PISNT>
</PIS>
- <COFINS>
- <COFINSNT>
<CST>08</CST>
</COFINSNT>
</COFINS>
</imposto>
<infAdProd>PC.93378954-COMPL.PED.XRW001RV</infAdProd>
</det>
+ <total>
- <ICMSTot>
<vBC>2869.60</vBC>
<vICMS>344.35</vICMS>
<vBCST>0.00</vBCST>
<vST>0.00</vST>
<vProd>2869.60</vProd>
<vFrete>0.00</vFrete>
<vSeg>0.00</vSeg>
<vDesc>0.00</vDesc>
<vII>0.00</vII>
<vIPI>0.00</vIPI>
<vPIS>0.00</vPIS>
<vCOFINS>0.00</vCOFINS>
<vOutro>0.00</vOutro>
<vNF>2869.60</vNF>
</ICMSTot>
<retTrib />
</total>
+ <transp>
<modFrete>0</modFrete>
- <transporta>
<CNPJ>00980331000488</CNPJ>
<xNome>THALE TRANSPORTES E LOG. LTDA</xNome>
<IE>5963866160070</IE>
<xEnder>ROD BR 459-KM 121 - DIST INDL, S/N</xEnder>
<xMun>SANTA RITA DO SAPUCAI</xMun>
<UF>MG</UF>
</transporta>
- <veicTransp>
<placa>DPF8048</placa>
<UF>SP</UF>
</veicTransp>
- <vol>
<qVol>20</qVol>
<esp>OUTROS</esp>
<pesoL>64.000</pesoL>
<pesoB>104.000</pesoB>
</vol>
</transp>
+ <cobr>
- <fat>
<nFat>000000395768</nFat>
<vOrig>2869.60</vOrig>
</fat>
- <dup>
<nDup>1</nDup>
<dVenc>2012-11-20</dVenc>
<vDup>2869.60</vDup>
</dup>
</cobr>
- <infAdic>
<infCpl>VIA DE TRANSPORTE RODOVIARIA CODIGO : 108061 PEDIDO NRO : ACIMA FABRICA :72480 REDESPACHO ATRAVES DE VELOCE LOGISTICA S/A ESTRADA DOS ALVARENGAS SAO BERNARDO CAMPO ASSUNCAO SP CNPJ : 10.299.567/0003-26 IE : 635.600.028.11 IPI - IMUNE CFE.ART.18, INCISO II, DO RIPI - DECRETO No.7.212/2010. REMESSA COM FIM ESPECIFICO DE EXPORTACAOMERC.A SER EXPORT.P/GENERAL MOTORS DO BRASIL LTDA.DECEX=3-0322/10-0007 ESTOCA-GEM TEMPORARIA NA VELOCE LOGISTICA S.A. ESTR.ALVARENGAS,4018 B.ASSUNCAO S.B.C. CNPJ10.299.567/0003-26IE.635.600.028.110 FT NR.431.183 ROMANEIO :131.588</infCpl>
</infAdic>
</infNFe>
+ <Signature xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
- <SignedInfo>
<CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315" />
<SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1" />
- <Reference URI="#NFe31121059106377000172550010003957681605366269">
- <Transforms>
<Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature" />
<Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315" />
</Transforms>
<DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1" />
<DigestValue>jN2ozPH3/GvAS8Q5lh/t9bzuXCw=</DigestValue>
</Reference>
</SignedInfo>
<SignatureValue>GAXPLvMCtIYdwMxXDcyL0kr5hCDPCFw8/uNYHFcdTMqBhLgIcEtzHRf8qioWlUVSHNf5jnCLKGjhDV4bEJqkcBhWsKouMzojQ+Z6hkFQAWNuJfPIzutmtRy3AePc5tHK0lI3tF3ws9memboJ8sW21IOWHB6eB0jK2gmhcOlDejc=</SignatureValue>
- <KeyInfo>
- <X509Data>
<X509Certificate>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</X509Certificate>
</X509Data>
</KeyInfo>
</Signature>
</NFe>
- <protNFe versao="2.00">
- <infProt>
<tpAmb>1</tpAmb>
<verAplic>13_0_32</verAplic>
<chNFe>31121059106377000172550010003957681605366269</chNFe>
<dhRecbto>2012-10-03T17:35:55</dhRecbto>
<nProt>131120853536488</nProt>
<digVal>jN2ozPH3/GvAS8Q5lh/t9bzuXCw=</digVal>
<cStat>100</cStat>
<xMotivo>Autorizado o uso da NF-e</xMotivo>
</infProt>
</protNFe>
</nfeProc>

Compare two members from the same dimension in HFR

Hi,
Is it possibe to compare two members from the same dimension in HFR? The requirement is to compare Year and Week members from the same dimension. The Week date will be selected from POV. The corresponding Year date should be displayed in the report. Week dates are in the format W2008-03-07 and Year dates are in YTD2008-03-07.
The dates are same except the preceding character.I am unable to compare these two. In my understanding there's no substring or replace functions in HFR.
Kindly help. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Uma

Hi,
How is your database structured? it may be possible to use the 'RelativeMember' function if it will always be the same number of steps between the 'W' member and the 'YTD' member, e.g. if your hierarchy is something like:
Time
.Weeks
..W2008-03-07
..W2008-03-10 etc.. for 52 weeks
.YTD
..YTD2008-03-07
..YTD2008-03-10 etc.. for 52 weeks
In your report select 'Current Point of View for Time' in one row/column and in the other use:
RelativeMember set up as follows:
Member: Current Point of View for Time
Offset: 52
Hierarchy: Time
RelativeMemberList: Lev0, Time
UseFirstDescendant: leave unselected
Hope this helps
StuartGame
www.analitica.co.uk

Help needed to compare two Key Figures and show out put

hello experts,
                   I am comparing the Sales data for two year/month. I need to compare these two KF and show the result only if one is greater than the other by 40%. Sample
Jan/2008                             Jan /2007
400                                      600
500                                      300
300                                      700
600                                      400
The columns should be outputted only if Jan 2008 is greater than Jan 2007 by 40% for all customers in a business area. Thank you all in advance.
Regards,
-Akash

Hi Akash,
Your requirement could be met by
Creating a Calculated Key Figure say variance = ( ( Jan2008 - Jan2007 ) / Jan 2008 ) *100
Then create a new Condition on Variance so as to display rows only when Variance > 40
Hope this solves ur issue.Do revert
Vasavi

Comparing data in columns using SUBSTR

I have a column with a case number(VARCHAR2) and a column with a year(NUMBER) consisting of data similiar to:
CASENUMBER-----------------------------YEAR
199713029----------------------------------97
199713678----------------------------------97
199713691----------------------------------97
199713709----------------------------------97
199713844----------------------------------97
199714141----------------------------------97
2001002718--------------------------------01
2001002725--------------------------------01
2001002894--------------------------------01
95 U 9998-----------------------------------95
95 U 9999-----------------------------------95
96 A 0019-----------------------------------96
96 A 0058-----------------------------------96
96 A 0067-----------------------------------96
When i run this query:
SELECT SUBSTR(LOCCASENUM,1,4) as FIRST_FOUR,SUBSTR(YEAR,1,2)as "test"
FROM DATA_TABLE
where SUBSTR(LOCCASENUM,1,4) != SUBSTR(YEAR,1,2)I get this result:
FIRSTFOUR------ test_
1997----------------- 97
1997----------------- 97
1997----------------- 97
1997----------------- 97
1997----------------- 94
1997----------------- 97
2001------------------ 1
2001------------------ 1
2001------------------ 4
95 U----------------- 95
95 U----------------- 95
96 A----------------- 96
96 A----------------- 96
96 A----------------- 93
What i am wanting to do is compare these two columns and display the only ones that do not match. I am not sure if i need to do an LPAD on the year column or what. Can someone help? Thanks
Deanna

I see Walter has beaten me to it, but i'll post this anyway in the off chance you're not running on Oracle 10 or better (since that's when regular expression support was introduced).
ME_XE?with data as
2 (
3     select '199713029'   as casenumber, 97 as year from dual union all
4     select '199713678'   as casenumber, 97 as year from dual union all
5     select '199713691'   as casenumber, 97 as year from dual union all
6     select '199713709'   as casenumber, 97 as year from dual union all
7     select '199713844'   as casenumber, 97 as year from dual union all
8     select '199714141'   as casenumber, 97 as year from dual union all
9     select '2001002718' as casenumber, 01 as year from dual union all
10     select '2001002725' as casenumber, 01 as year from dual union all
11     select '2001002894' as casenumber, 01 as year from dual union all
12     select '95 U 9998'   as casenumber, 95 as year from dual union all
13     select '95 U 9999'   as casenumber, 95 as year from dual union all
14     select '96 A 0019'   as casenumber, 96 as year from dual union all
15     select '96 A 0058'   as casenumber, 96 as year from dual union all
16     select '96 A 0067'   as casenumber, 96 as year from dual
17 )
18 select *
19 from
20 (
21     select
22        casenumber,
23        year,
24        to_date(lpad(to_char(year), 2, '0') || '0101', 'RRMMDD') as year_year,
25        case
26           when instr(casenumber, ' ') = 0
27           then
28              to_date(substr(casenumber, 1,4) || '0101', 'RRRRMMDD')
29           else
30              to_date(substr(casenumber, 1,2) || '0101', 'RRMMDD')
31        end as case_year
32     from data
33 )
34 where year_year = case_year;
CASENUMBER                                   YEAR YEAR_YEAR                  CASE_YEAR
199713029                                      97 01-JAN-1997 12 00:00       01-JAN-1997 12 00:00
199713678                                      97 01-JAN-1997 12 00:00       01-JAN-1997 12 00:00
199713691                                      97 01-JAN-1997 12 00:00       01-JAN-1997 12 00:00
199713709                                      97 01-JAN-1997 12 00:00       01-JAN-1997 12 00:00
199713844                                      97 01-JAN-1997 12 00:00       01-JAN-1997 12 00:00
199714141                                      97 01-JAN-1997 12 00:00       01-JAN-1997 12 00:00
2001002718                                      1 01-JAN-2001 12 00:00       01-JAN-2001 12 00:00
2001002725                                      1 01-JAN-2001 12 00:00       01-JAN-2001 12 00:00
2001002894                                      1 01-JAN-2001 12 00:00       01-JAN-2001 12 00:00
95 U 9998                                      95 01-JAN-1995 12 00:00       01-JAN-1995 12 00:00
95 U 9999                                      95 01-JAN-1995 12 00:00       01-JAN-1995 12 00:00
96 A 0019                                      96 01-JAN-1996 12 00:00       01-JAN-1996 12 00:00
96 A 0058                                      96 01-JAN-1996 12 00:00       01-JAN-1996 12 00:00
96 A 0067                                      96 01-JAN-1996 12 00:00       01-JAN-1996 12 00:00
14 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.07

Compare two year column

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for